TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Atreigas Archive

View 0 posts and 463 comments by Atreigas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is made even more stupid by the fact they can do most normal fingertip things using their knuckles.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/08/26 05:10 PM
2

Anyone got one with more pixels?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/26 03:51 PM
6

If you ignore all the actual issues men face and exaggerate all the issues women face.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/08/26 10:03 PM
3

The upvote rates are tragic. At least yours are rated positive still.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 11:06 PM
1

At least she considers it one of the worst things she did. Its not much. But its something.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 04:35 PM
2

Theyre right about one thing. Flipping the genders drastically changed the reaction.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 04:34 PM
1

r/commentmitosis
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 04:33 PM
3

Long story short. "They are the oppressors and thus evil."
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 04:30 PM
10

Ffs. Did they really have to try and make it look like an invasion? Stupid question, I know.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/07/26 08:51 AM
13

"But dont you know only men do that? Hurrr durrr"
/r/EverydayMisandry31/07/26 08:11 AM
7

Congratulations to the engaged couple. May the commenters find themselves stalked by slenderman.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/26 04:17 PM
2

The most ironic thing about this is that saying [demographic] cant be [status] is classical bigotry. The very act of saying men cant be victims like that is misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/26 03:03 PM
3

Bigots find shitty excuses to justify their bigotry. What else is new.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/07/26 10:01 AM
6

Red flags, the musical.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/07/26 03:51 PM
0

What does the gender neutral version say?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 11:15 AM
6

Something something my ex vs my new boyfriend.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/26 06:58 PM
5

If the context was different this could be a funny cannibalism joke.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/26 04:26 PM
5

Tbf, a condom found inside of them is fairly telling. Unless they used the condom while fingering? Seems a bit unlikely tho. Not that I think they even considered that fact before accusing, mind you. But still.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 06:17 PM
1

2's logic is sound. The morality is still scuffed, but she acknowledges that. But the logic is valid. If youre gonna be awful to the kid, its probably better not to have em. Credit where its due. Even if the context is tragic.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 04:27 AM
1

Ah right. Thats why you care so much to have the last word. Edit: thanks for the laugh, buddy. Your mental gymnastics are impressively idiotic.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:36 PM
1

How very mature and not petty at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:34 PM
1

Learn the difference between cant and wont. Youre simply not worth the effort.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:26 PM
3

Holy fallacy. I dont even know where to begin. Literally everything you just said is nonsensical propaganda. Not that there is a point in trying to convince you. So whatever. <image>
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 02:14 PM
7

At least part of that is culture and nurture. But the result is the same. What does change, is how to deal with it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 01:29 PM
1

Its against the sub rules, im afraid.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/26 12:22 PM
2

You didnt censor the name when mentioned in a comment.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/26 08:41 AM
2

... no. You are stopping it.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 03:40 PM
1

Yes. But what is that, specifically, referring to? Guy (f) pretending to be female? Guy pretending to be female (f)? (Those genders have been stated already!
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 08:23 PM
2

Lmao. Dont they realise that the abolishment of gender segregated spaces is a pretty fundamental aspect of gender equality. So even ignoring the transphobia, this is sabotaging feminist ideal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 02:51 PM
1

Why does the poll have the same options repeatedly for (m), (f) and (other)? What is it even referring to here?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 11:38 AM
0

Im not. I simply think its scummy to focus on that over the core of it. Yes, its scummy when they highlight it for women and girls too. But those arent the topic rn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 08:24 PM
-4

Ehhh. Disagree. Putting arbitrary designations on it, even if its based on who they send, takes away from the horror of it all. They are children. The end. Specifying boys like this is just using it to push your agenda. Which is a bit of a scummy move. The fact they are only willing to send male soldiers is its own independent issue from.the child soldier issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 05:43 PM
16

I think thats more a matter of character and social connections than gender. And honestly, its not emotional labor. Its being a good friend. If they think thats labor, they arent good friends. So really. Telling on themselves here.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/26 05:13 PM
2

How dare people have fun and turn their brain off for something stupid! Dont they know there are problems in this world!?!?!??!¿
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/26 03:45 PM
2

Fair enough. There is a little bit of such implication of that thing tho. Enough to easily take that as message. Or at least, not enough to eliminate it as option. Anyways, yea, wholly agree. But thats exactly why I focus my rhetoric more on balance. Yes, misandry is the "under represented" one, but focusing on that too much makes it sound like youre excluding misogyny. So yeah, treat em as equal. That gets the message across.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 08:07 PM
2

Because sexism is sexism. Misandry gets ignored, yes. But through the pain it causes, it encourages misogyny and vice versa. A negative feedback loop as one is used to justify the other. I mean, arent you arguing that misogyny is a lesser problem because its more acknowledged? No matter how you put it, the root is shared. The only real question is which side you spit on. Two very different symptoms, pointing to the same sickness. You cant lose one without the other, for sexism is inherently a fa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 06:06 PM
19

Impossible. They would need to keep up a perfect act for decades, or their entire life. Kids are more perceptive than people think. No, these poor children are gonna grow up with awful parenting.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/07/26 12:11 PM
1

This is why I encourage subtracting all unnecessary info. Just ask "is it okay to ghost someone." For example.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:35 PM
1

Never said it was. Hence why I didnt put any weight into my judments.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 08:01 PM
23

I mean, it is an indicator of a lack of trust. But blind trust is how you walk into the abyss. Trust but verify is wisdom for a reason.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 09:23 AM
0

Fair enough. As I said, I havent seen. I judged from what I could piece together here in comments.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 09:18 AM
3

Ehh. Its a story. Having an interpretation of what happened is kind of a given. Perhaps he was intended to be a rapist. But that doesnt mean "he wasnt really aware of it all" is a wrong interpretation. Not the intended one, sure. But still. I dont see anyone claiming he was a good guy here. Though yes, some are maybe overeager to defend him. But... OP isnt wrong that you cant expect any normal human being to just... assume wish magic is real. You can argue about other parts, but not that. I have…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/26 02:37 PM
2

Yeah, deffo malicious interpretation if thats your only takeaway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 06:15 AM
3

... ye, you just ignored everything I actually said in order to paint me as a villain. Im not gonna argue against a blatant malicious actor. Who ignores the fact I acknowledged the other side's wrongs. (I just also acknowledged that yours has its own share of troubles.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 09:19 PM
0

A failed relationship is always the result of bad communication and compromising. One side can have more fault or less of it. But it always takes two to build a relationship.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 06:23 PM
5

I... think thats satire? Like trying to reflect the sentiment as a joke? It doesnt really work, but... an attempt, ya know?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 05:53 PM
1

Ya see, the core of their argument is exactly the same. Just mirrored. Truthfully, I dont know how right either side is. But you can both have a valid point. Misogyny and misandry can both be real. It is after all, two sides of the same coin. Two faces for the same demon. Every judgement on one carries out a reflection on the other. By reducing it to "they are the bad guys" both sides rot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 05:45 PM
2

Eh. There are genuinely good feminists. Its not a mask. The issue is that there is no good way to seperate em from the bad. And they get infected by the bad as a result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 02:15 PM
3

The post is otherwise good. Like, if it wasnt for the blatant misandry I would be happy but... no. Of course not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 12:23 PM
8

I lost half my braincells reading this nonsense.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/26 12:18 PM
8

Its not hypocrisy if I do it! Dont be silly! But yeah, this is just awful.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/06/26 09:05 AM
1

No, it means child born out of wedlock. In practice, yes. That generally comes down to single mom. But that isnt what it means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 08:46 AM
2

While I agree that using the term for someone born out of wedlock as an insult is problematic. The rest is really meh. Youre basically saying its the male equivalent to Bitch and frankly that one doesnt convince me either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 08:45 AM
2

Proof comes to deliver itself.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 05:18 PM
11

The meme itself is fine. Not very funny, but no inherent issues. Its really just OOP being a jackass with the title.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 04:34 PM
3

Gorseshoe theory.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 08:29 AM
9

You definitely lost grammar skills with your lack of I's.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/26 02:18 AM
79

This is just the genderbent version of "its not rape if she got wet."
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/26 06:58 PM
1

Yeah this. Throwing an angry punch at someone and then realising "oh shit, they dead now" is quite a bit different than... most of any other kind of murder. Not even like, pushing them off the stairs because that takes a level of planning. One punch is literally just that. A singular punch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 10:19 AM
0

Some of them genuinely are better. Unfortunately, they dont see issues like these.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 09:16 AM
17

Of course they dont care. Dont you know suffering is a competition? Women have it worse! Which means anyone else's feelings are invalid.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/26 10:22 PM
1

Im not arguing against misandry, or that it being dismissed is an issue. Im just saying that dismissing misogyny doesnt make anything better. Both misandry and misogyny are easy to spot if you care to see them. But youve made clear you only care to see the one. Nothing I can say will change that.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:30 PM
1

facepalm okay, now youre just looking for excuses to dismiss me here. But, really. Do you expect to feel discrimination that isnt pointed at you? It by definition isnt something you experience. It might be possible if you put in a bunch of effort, but its inherently isnt something that just happens to you. Thats how they dismiss misandry. Dont be the same sort.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 02:40 PM
1

They complain about it all the time. Just because ya dont see it doesnt mean it aint there. They exaggerate and point blame too wide. But that doesnt mean there isnt a root of truth.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 08:16 AM
7

How kind.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 09:16 PM
8

Is the first inage a garbage bin lid?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 07:37 PM
11

They face plenty of misogyny, sure. But just because youre a victim doesnt mean youre not an abuser. No amount of being hurt makes it okay to hurt others. They sadly dont really get that.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 07:09 PM
6

I cant really blame him for that particular issue. Anyone would lose track pretty quickly.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 09:14 AM
1

Its not. Thats the tragedy of it all.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/26 10:33 AM
5

Two sides of the same coin. It is a rarity that they are wholly seperate.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 05:37 PM
2

How many men face the same stuff? But either dont realise or dont say it? Relationships are messy business. Coming to conflict at some point is guaranteed. (Unless you die first) some people just react badly to that. Yet, talking about men's issues is way too taboo. (Incels are a problem, yes. But that doesnt make your reaction not a problematic as well.)
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 02:53 PM
8

True for any kind of bigotry. Those people deserve no respect.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:32 PM
4

Most people look good when they try a bit. Average is average for a reason and the reason is being successful enough to spread so far and wide it becomes the norm.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/26 10:14 AM
1

Neither tesponse is bad, really. Its just that the contrast is alarming.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 11:46 PM
6

Yep. That was in the implications of my last line, methinks. But its not bad to have it explicitly out there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 09:54 PM
6

Eh. It happens to the best of us. As I can attest. ;p
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 06:34 PM
8

Ah, thats the word, yes. I wholly agree, not gendered at all. Just sharing the context I often see it used in. Its stupid, but thats how I often see it used. Not sure why you thought that was a counterargument, rather than adding some extra context. You just repeated what I said in more detail. Feminism is horridly inconsistent about. Still, fair's fair. I did the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 05:32 PM
-7

Ive mostly heard it used about women who are just walking around like normal and then get stared at by strangers. At that point its... well, justifiable to be grumpy about it. But yea, they are horridly inconsistent about women willingly displaying themselves. Sometimes its empowering, sometimes its misogyny. Whatever is more convenient to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 01:36 PM
23

I dont blame them for giving words to it. Even if its sexist words. Sometimes a shitty descriptor is the best you can come up with. I blame them for pretending its anything other than a sexist word for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 01:32 PM
5

r/aboringdystopia
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 07:29 AM
2

Bigots are never looking for a reason. Always an excuse.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/26 08:10 PM
8

Victim complex.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/26 11:31 AM
1

Yes. She also says he deserves it (commendation) and helping him look good because he himself doesnt have the time. Just because she's also enjoying it doesnt mean its not a green flag. Heck, maybe she enjoys his enjoyment of it. Or at least in part. Love is about doing stuff for the other just because they like it. (Amongs other things) so yea, this is a green flag. Even if you disagree with that, not being insistent on the provider role is a green flag still. Sure, is it as much of a green fla…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/26 11:36 AM
8

True. But it does make it less bad.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/26 08:04 AM
3

Does it matter? From the sound of it, she likes buying him stuff he likes. Or they both do. Its part of a good relationship. Only part, but its the only part they speak of here.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/26 08:00 AM
28

This strikes me as a skit. Or meant to be one? Either way, the comments are pretty darn yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/26 09:15 PM
4

At least its only one comment. Even if its suspiciously high up there.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/26 01:04 AM
0

I have no idea how OPs commentary says that. Or how what I did would say that. Far as Im concerned, youre conjuring meaning from nothing. No idea what kind of kool aid youve been sipping to get high enough to imagine that kind of malice in my words. I have been asking for explanations, but youve just given me more of this nonsensical nonsequitr bullshit. Insisting youre right without explaining jack and shit. Just repeating your baseless accusations and nonsequitrs. If youre the one defending au…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 12:12 AM
0

I have argued literally nothing in favor of femcels. The closest Ive come is saying that there are good examples of incel hatecult bullshit on r/inceltears. Which explicitly doesnt say anything about femcel nonsense. So thats malicious misinterpretation. As is your second part. Just because there's bigger threats doesnt mean you should ignore the small ones. Thats how you let the grow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 08:11 PM
1

And you wont find me arguing that femcels dont need to be taken down a peg either. Buddy, they dont even do it in the shadows anymore, they openly tell people theyre doing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 07:08 PM
0

Hmhm. I guess I took it too literally. Yaytism. Ironic, considering the subject matter. Just because epstein is a bigger issue, doesnt mean the hatecult is something to be ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 06:51 PM
-1

The word is neurodivergent, not neuroatypical. Yes, clubbing them in with incels is wrong. But my point is that I dont think its wrong to poke at incels (the hate cult) which is what that word means to most people as far as Im aware. That is not an explanation. Youre just repeating your... not even argument, just an expressed opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 04:22 PM
-3

I am literally not doing that? Incel is famously the name of a misogynistic hate cult. The fact fhe name comes from sexual ability has kinda grown besides the point. They use that as excuse often. If you misinterpret like that, yes that is shitty logic. But that wasnt my point so its not a good argument against my point. I fail to see how that makes a difference, the screenshots are real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 04:03 PM
2

Ehh. The rape academy myth came from misinterpreting views as participants from what I know. The hatecult is very real and quite persistent and rather particular about what being an incel is. Besides that, fair points. I wholly aggree with the last one. In my defence, internet is big and I cant reasonably verify everything I encounter, just keep an open mind to counterarguments. Which I deff do. The other guy just did a shit job at it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 03:19 PM
1

Just call yourself single and talk about struggles dating like that. Incel is very famously the name of that hate cult. Yes, some people conflate the two, they are jackasses. Yes, I will call those out when I see em. But theyre also not the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 02:26 PM
0

I have no idea what youre on about. Except the middle sentence. That I get.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 02:24 PM
1

Your reply mightve disappeared but Im still gonna address what I can. Of course Im gonna assume the worst of you, youve done nothing but vaguepost and maliciously misinterpret. Hence why I suggested its an autism-allistic (nonautism) misunderstanding. You are either genuinely not getting what Im putting down, which autism could be an explanation for, or a real bag of dicks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 02:09 PM
1

I did that way early on. "Emotional baggage and past relationships are largely unrelated." Emotional baggage isnt scummy though morally a bit sketch. Caring about it only when its about past relationships is. As is asserting that past relationships always cause it in the present.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 01:57 PM
0

I never said they did, I was arguing that they didnt. Your comprehension is garbage.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 01:32 PM
1

Your reply got shadowbanned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:30 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:29 PM
0

Your wording is shit.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 01:28 PM
0

If you were trying to say that emotional past is important, youre doing a shit job of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 01:24 PM
1

No, I had edited it in, and then shortly after you posted, as in, within seconds. Not my fault the timing was bad. Though I didnt make a point of any of it for that very reason. Heck, the one time I did it was a throwback to that clarification. Your argument was incoherent to me, I have been attempting to address, clarify and comprehend simultaneously. You were not clear, you cast doubt on my definitions. I clarified according to my understanding of the subject while you yourself provided no cla…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:23 PM
-3

There is a reason I mentioned auti-alli misunderstanding. Because otherwise youre the incoherent one. Getting mad because I addressed a brought up topic, even if its an aside. Its still not very coherent to me. I have never encountered incel shit that wasnt misogynistic hate cult stuff. But then again, Ive never particularly gone looking. I will admit that much. Regardless, its famous for the hate cult and thats what it means to me. Perhaps I am wrong, but... well, you werent exactly clear about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:05 PM
0

You mentioned cucking, which is pretty much cheating but with an observer. Youre dodging the facts. Mhm. Right. Because knowing what you do and dont like is... cucking now? Now THAT is shitty cope. You have not, at any point engaged in my argument with honesty, everything youve said has been a stupid assumption about my argument. Its incoherent rambling and shitty self justification.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 12:56 PM
0

Lmao, no. The majority of "every single person ever" doesnt really care so long as its not cheating. You are the outlier here. Having had past relationships isnt cheating, nor cucking. Because it is, by definition, over. Past tense. You need to literally redefine the words to have even a shitty appeal to emotion fallacy. So no, I will not speak of cuckoldry and cheating because thats a strawman youre putting in my mouth. Or at most benevolent, you being delusional.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 12:21 PM
-7

I use the word for those who self describe it. The hate cult. Nobody else wants to bear the title from my understanding. Which sub? Inceltears, which I explicitly referred to as a rebuttal to OP's aside? Or the one I was actually (and obviously) talking about there, the one OP mentioned they got the fucking image from? "The male loneliness epidemic isnt severe enough"? Seriously, how do you not get that context? Because none of that logic is weird, youre just being obtuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 11:50 AM
-11

My first paragraph is a seperate point. The rest is a rebuttal to one of OP's offhand comments in the last paragraph. "Which is why virgin and incel shouldnt be used as insult." Ive put in a divider to make it clearer. Does that help? The point is just... literally exactly what I said. Going to subs like that you are kinda looking for misandrist takes. No more, no less. Same with the incel stuff. Sounds like an auti-alli miscommunication to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 11:41 AM
0

Because its largely unrelated. Emotional baggage van come from a thousand sources and only some of them are past relationships. More likely, theyre over any past relationships already. It sounds like shitty cope to me
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 11:38 AM
0

I doubt people can care about someone else's past sex life and not be scummy about it at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 10:40 AM
-26

Not surprised given where you got the repost from. Really should be expecting that. Hella vile? Yes. Expected? Also yes. I disagree that incel shouldnt be used as insult. While yes, "involuntary celibate" as a basic general status isnt hateful, inceldom however has morphed into a mysogynistic hate cult thats about blaming women for everything. If you spend any amount of time on r/inceltears you will quickly find some genuinely fucked up shit on the same level if not beyond what you show here. (Y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 09:59 AM
36

Because, bitchcake. They never just say "I hate this specific man," instead they say "I hate all men for this one specific guy's faults."
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 07:25 AM
0

I meant historical origins of that norm. Not the reasons we may or may not want it or that said culture tells us there is. So youre missing the point entirely. That aside, I sincerely doubt the truth of... pretty much everything you just said.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 06:13 AM
2

Technically actor is male only because women who do so are actresses. Which is a different word and thus an entirely different concept entirely. Obviously.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/26 03:22 PM
2

But I think we can agree with them that thats an issue.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/26 03:36 PM
0

Yea. No. Youre making a mountain out of a molehill and stuffing people into corners so hard youre breaking the walls.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 03:35 AM
4

... it really fucking doesnt. I know of zero men who fight on a weekly basis. Outside of combat sports. Even those are fairly rare.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 11:07 PM
3

I once had my arm in tma cast for four months. It had atrophied enough that I could barely move it. Unless you get into fights on a weekly basis your logic simply doesnt hold up.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 10:27 PM
39

I started losing faith when he said "especially girls."
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 10:08 PM
2

How often do you really get in a fight? Muscle atrophy is fast enough that you need to exercise to keep that. The sentiment is one thing, but Im pretty sure the facts are just nonsense.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 10:07 PM
2

From what I know, the whole virginity thing comes from a desperate, shitty attempt to guarantee the child is actually the father's. And OP, while youre correct. The interpretation that its misogyny is also correct. It can be both. The fact the standard is there is a fact. The origin however? Long lost to time. There's no point digging up empty graves, all you'll get is dirt to throw at eachother.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 12:58 PM
3

Bitch is pretty much just gender neutral. Same way asshole is.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 04:25 PM
5

I know right? Yesterday. A jewish person stepped on my toe so now Im a nazi.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/26 11:58 PM
15

Most people wont make good parents, period. Thats more a limitation of the human condition than anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/26 12:25 AM
1

Well, they certainly dont look like women. So that much makes sense. Doesnt mean there's substance to it. Also... I genuinely cannot imagine a female minion that doesnt look like a shitty parody of some sort.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 11:14 PM
28

I didnt think the minions even had gender or sex.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/26 09:55 PM
1

Nothing but insults again. As expected.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 05:07 PM
0

Right. Of course. You know me so well from pure assumption. Only if you actively try to interpret it as such. Which, given that its your hobby... Bruh. You really havent seen how recent that was? No buddy. Your egotism is showing. I made that comment because I believe it. I showed it to you because you had literally asked. I dont go out of my way for assholes, but linking a recent comment is simple enough. Unlike you, I dont argue just to feel smug about it. I argue to make a point and convince …
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 10:57 AM
1

So too, does it come naturally to some to make other people the villain at every opportunity. Which is why I specifically set apart the part that was amusing. Though yes, I would laugh at a misogynist joke too. I enjoy dark and provocative humor. The latter in particular. Its incandescent rage because thats the only emotion Im allowed to display by your standard. Bullying because you keep coming after me minding my own business like a mad dog. Particularly with how youre now digging up the past.…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 02:09 AM
1

Rolls eyes says the one who never considered the possibility I meant it in any way that wasnt malicious. You dont have the right to complain about me being a dick when youve been nothing but. Just because its a serious matter, doesnt mean I cant have a laugh about it. I can think part of it is funny, while still seeing the issue. Taking a stance that isnt pure incandescent rage at any opportunity isnt how I live my life and no amount of bullying will change that. Why are you even here? This is f…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/26 11:02 PM
2

Now I wonder what the gender neutral ver says.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 01:04 PM
6

This would all be acceptable if it wasnt for that last comment. Because until that point it can be construed as "Ill never love anyone the same. So it wouldnt be worth it."
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/26 11:51 AM
11

Feminazi? Femifascist(ic)?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/26 11:47 AM
4

"hire a male babysitter then" Okay.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/26 01:17 PM
19

Seriously? Lambasting men because biology decided its your sex that can get pregnant? Nature is a bitch. Get over it and deal with it. Like everyone else thats sane. Seriously lady, you sure youre not mad because of gender envy?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 10:21 PM
2

Hang on, I need to eject my stomach from my body in its entirety. Growing a new one will be a pain.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 02:55 PM
2

No no, he said "she had four kids with him. She already had five." That is a stupid amount of children, one way or another. Someone who will dump another four on her when she already has five is not a standup guy. Even without leaving her. It doesnt speak well of her judgement either. Having so many. Unless its a very different country than mine.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/26 07:23 PM
21

"My mom's a shit judge of character. Why are men guilty?" Corrected it for you.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/26 01:32 PM
-1

True. But thats still secondary to the narcissism imo.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/26 07:42 PM
6

Welp. Cant beat that argument.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 06:39 AM
32

So theyre also counting the women who checked it out as a wtf. Quite possibly including themselves. Uhuh. How fun.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 06:03 PM
3

True gender equality!
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 11:39 AM
1

No, women HAVE always been a priority. That does not equate to treated well. But important? Very much yes. Women and how they are treated, due to the importance of birth, has always been central in every human society. The simple ability to give birth means women's bodies have inherent value to a society. Men dont. Thing is, there is generally two ways to treat someone with an important ability. 1. VIP, 2. Enslaved. Either way, a good method to get access to it. So... yes. Always a priority. But…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 04:59 PM
2

But I thought feminism was about fighting against gender roles and putting women as nurturers by default.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 04:49 PM
3

Given the exact context. This seems almost satirical of misandry? Like, they basically say that testing their drinks is cruelty. Even when done willingly. As well that men love their drinks. I suppose it depends on if you take this at face value or see it as indicative of deeper issues. Either way, I think both are valid interpretations.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 07:34 PM
6

Fuckig yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 10:11 AM
10

Source: extra potent hallucinogens
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 08:12 PM
5

May they receive all they wish upon others.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 06:54 AM
3

Oh really? So youre saying kill everyone with an active imagination huh? Well fuck you too!
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 11:29 PM
2

Fair enough. It sounds like a name with a story?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 09:17 PM
5

🤔👏 Well put! Perfect summary.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 09:06 PM
2

I think they genuinely believe it too much to be purely performative. But yea, its far more performative than Id like... Completely unrelated, but love the username, dutchie.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 09:04 PM
11

Isnt feminism supposed to fight for men's rights to be feminine too? Yet youre mocking it now? Really cant stay consistent. Doesnt really seem misandrist to me tho. Hmm. I guess its putting blame on men? Then again, misogyny does stay strong in certain places and bubbbles, so kind context sensitive. The rest is pure yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/26 05:54 PM
2

Well. Thats fucking vile.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/26 07:48 PM
1

Some level of ribbing is to be expected, but I do agree. Girls only really starts the sexism in the final bit where as Boys starts it more or less from the top and is worse about it anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 02:53 PM
4

There's some good eggs remaining. Theyve often drunk a bit too much koolaid. But still.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 11:26 AM
3

What a fun place. I see nothing wrong with that. /s I assume youre not linking or namedropping for a reason?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 10:41 AM
2

What sub is it even?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 10:26 AM
2

The internet just calls it "pick me" attitude.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 10:24 AM
-14

2-3rd down is gud. 7-3rd is neutral. 8-2nd is at least trying. 11-1st is sketch, but not outright. 11-3rd is... not truly sexist but still a complaint. While that is taking them at their word, their word is all we have in this context. Regardless, the rest is all vile.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 09:00 AM
6

This sounds like the kind of song concept a genuine misogynist would come up with to parody misandry and feminism into hateful caracitures.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 08:41 AM
0

Oooh. No direct quote? Just words you put in my mouth? Why do you flinch now when its me demanding proof? Maybe because youve imagined it? Lmao. You were bragging sooo much about it before. I never claimed otherwise. I just said I dont care to put in effort beyond what I do for myself and my own confort. I literally told you I present male. You fucking idiot. Ah of course. Thats why youre so offended about it when I say its important. Communication, key in a relationship? How dare I say that whe…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 09:05 PM
0

I literally did not say that. I literally only ever claimed the first hurdle is simple. Please, actually read it. I beg of you. Or provide a direct quote of what and where exactly I say thats all there is to it. No, I dont really bother with presenting myself at all. I stick to comf. But hey, you wouldnt be Glad Way if you didnt imagine a slight in my words. So. I take it from your words that you disagree that communication is important in a relationship? And you wonder why I call you an incel.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:52 PM
0

You mean the comment that literally starts out with "its hard for everyone"? Like, literally outright saying its not easy? That one somehow meaning that I said its easy? Sure. Why not invert meaning. In that comment the only claim I make is about the first hurdle. I say nothing about what comes after or any dating experience. The fact that no commentary, to you, means im saying nothing else matters, rather than the only one I had something to say about, says more about you than me. I present mal…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:42 PM
0

I literally just said that the first hurdle is simple. That is, getting past the stranger danger phase. That doesnt mean easy, just simple. After that it becomes all about managing and maintaining your relationship. Which is definitely not easy or simple. I never specified "for men" thats you being a presumptuous shitstain. I made zero claims about my sexual experience either. Thats you being a presumptuous shitstain. I never claimed to be a woman, thats you being a presumptuous shitstain. I jus…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 07:57 PM
0

Not at all. Lol. Your ability to accurately interpret words is vastly warped by your bias. I claimed none of those things if you dont drown them in delusion and bias. But when have you ever cared about my words rather than what you can pretend they mean?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 07:41 PM
0

Lolno. Just because you refuse to possibly read any other interpretation to my words doesnt mean I claimed that. But hey, "genuine benevolence" is as alien to you as cthulu. Its not like you even tried. Lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:40 AM
0

And that was, again, complete fabrication of my words. I have never claimed any of that lmao. All youve exposed is your own terrible judgment. I learn from the best!
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 09:44 PM
0

Malicious misinterpretation. Coming at people accusing of being terrible, cherrypicking their answers to support that narrative and furthermore doing the same elsewhere is not good for convincing them. Who'da thunk? As for the incel thing... well, its just your attitude and presumptuousness. I have pointed that out before but the fact you deny even the possibility doesnt make it less true. No matter what you say or argue against it, youve been acting like one.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 09:39 PM
0

The only sexism I express is what you assign me.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 07:24 PM
3

Ew. Not even pretending are we? This seems like its meant to support women but isnt it saying men doing it is better? Whats the point of this one? Emotional labor is mutual or it doesnt work. In any relationship, communication is key. So wrong. Except maid is a job, wife is something you choose. Even then, you can divide the labor differently. So still jist a choice. We generally just call that toxic, but okay then. Pussy is abundant and low value too. Comics jumping on the feminism craze, what …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 10:22 AM
0

Disagree with all of that. The only times youve pointed at me being "incorrect" is when you assigned me opinions I didnt express. But hey, putting words in people's mouths is your passion. Of course you'd object to the idea that your overly active imagination is wrong. Youre the only one claiming thats there. Lol. Besides, autism is known for its communication issues so gauche or not, its an inherently valid option, heck this is exactly the kind of auti-nt miscommunication scenario Ive seen so o…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 10:12 AM
1

I do, you just never made a good point. All youve brought to me.is hostility and assumption. The gnome post is saying "it can be that easy" yes. The OP is being overzealous, yes. The guy Im responding to is right, its poor proof that there's no good excuse. But so too, is my post not saying it isnt. Just that it being staged or not is hardly a factor. When you assign people opinions they dont express its easy to have them take any stance. Its called strawmanning, try not doing so for once. I am …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:41 AM
1

*assume based on nothing but vague memories and half assed searches. You have never even considered the possibility I was a good person or genuine in any of my claims. Thats why you dont get to judge me, but I have all the reason to judge you. Lmao. Assumptive again. No, lmao. Youre hatemongering them but youre real shit at it. It is the attittude youre bringing regardless and, taking cues from your stellar character assination methods, that means now youre just backtracking and pretending.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:31 AM
1

You know what? Correcting you on this is not worth the effort. Thats why I dropped them btw. Your points are shit and exhausting. Literally no. Theyre talking about the red flags and what incels masquerade as.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:27 AM
1

Ah. Finally admitting a mistake. Lmao, no theyre not. You are being a presumptuous twat again. Theyre talking about how incels use "cant find a date" as excuse and the various red flags that show them to be incels. Try looking through the posts as if theyre not misandrist, just for a minute. Because you really are grasping at straws here.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:26 AM
1

Then why isnt the same true for feminazi's? I have never claimed there is no misandry there. But when its something I can solidly claim, I make a stand. When its too iffy to say something solid, you wont get anywhere with it. If you say so. Says the guy who has only malicious misinterpretation on me. You are the only one here claiming I say misandry isnt a real issue. If you have proof, Id love to see it. Just the same, I have seen enough about you to confidently say you are not as insightful as…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:18 AM
1

Ignoring the fact that incel hatred is the most popular and frequent posts then? Tragic. Me. (Everything I say is somehow proof of my hatefulness.) The inceltears sub (literal hatemongering isnt enough to justify a "fuck those guys" response) Feminism (you make them all out to be feminazi's. Plenty good eggs in that basket though.)
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:07 AM
1

Ah, ignoring past context now huh? Don't move the goalposts any more, they'll break if you do. I was obviously talking about your claims about me. Lmao, strawmanning again. Now do a flip. I tire of that trick. A link where they were talking specifically about the hate cultists in the post. Lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:04 AM
1

Ooh, but what about you explicitly specifying the linked posts? Don't move the goalposts now, they'll break if you do it any more. No, they're the sub's words. Check the comments on those posts I linked, y'know, the ones that are both in the top 3 the most popular posts from the last year. No, they call the incel hate cult incels. The fact incels make themselves out to be "just men with trouble dating." Who then get caught in the crossfire. Pot, meet kettle.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:59 AM
1

Right. Of course incels dont actually exist. Just like the misandrists in feminism are just bots as well. No, you dont get to deny me because those are obvious bots because I say so! Like you say the same about incels. You see how pointless this argument is? But on a serious note. Yes, misandry is an issue. Yes, feminazi's suck and theyre way too accepted. I have been saying that since the start, preaching to the choir. But incels are the same in their little corner. Shit talking them is just as…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:55 AM
0

Have you actually read the post theyre talking about? You know, the blatant hateculting against women? Literally declaring all women should be sex slaves? Theyre not allowed to call incels out for that? Wow dude. You are not just displaying your bias but blatantly advertising it and proudly presenting it to the entire world.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:44 AM
1

Oop. There we go again with the malicious misinterpretation. You got proof of that? Or are you baselessly asserting again? Sure, but the foundations that make it work remain the same. If you cant be friends, you cant make a workable romance. Thats how healthy relations work. People may look for different things in friendly or romantic relations, but fundamentally what makes a good relation doesnt change. No no. I clicked the links. But when I searched "subhuman" I got nothing. Ah. I see. So your…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:40 AM
1

Whats posted frequently includes that, but also literal incel hatemongering. You incel hatemonger.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:35 AM
1

How telling that your links are hard proof but mine mean nothing. Couldnt show your bias harder. Like youre doing with incels? Who you know, loud and proud declare that women should be sex slaves? Misandry manifests largely in male issues being dismissed and ignored. Incels provide a perfect excuse for doing so. But looking past the grass right in front of your feet for meaning is too much to ask of you. I take issue with sexist posts. Regardless of location and place. Ive just learned to keep m…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:34 AM
0

I just did. Neither shows anything lmao. Besides, even if it did you would be wrong to put it in as my words because Ive never claimed to be so. Lmao. You know... "subhuman scum" is a distinctly incel hate cult word choice... hmmm. I wonder why.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:23 AM
1

rolls eyes neither is it wrong for me to look at whats posted frequently. Shits complicated and you cant really take it either way.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:21 AM
1

Then open your eyes, because clearly you arent looking at the front page. I pardon those posts because thats what incels pretend to be. Just normal, sympathetic men with minor social issues. In truth, well they spout some of the worst misogynist rhetoric you can imagine. They are the primary reason nobody takes male issues seriously. Because incels infiltrate and blow it up with hatred as if its just another mask. Their vitriol masks the real issues and genuine men hurting. Oooh. More strawmanni…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:19 AM
0

Ah, finally something other than assumptions and assertions. Im ace, but I dont have any trouble getting people to like me with just a bit of humour. As for the subhuman scum bit... those are your words. Not mine.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:10 AM
1

Lmao, no. I, like the majority of that sub refer with it to any man in the incel hate cult who blames women and lack of sex for all the world's wrongs. As for what it looks like... literally just scroll the sub without cherry picking for a bit and plenty examples. Like this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/I8UG5CpmLL
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:06 AM
1

Thats not really what the sub is to begin with. Its about making fun of the incel hate cult. They say these things because thats what the incels spout. Yes, it gets overzealous at times but at those times I call them out. Which is what you demand me to do. Or wait... now Im not allowed to comment there at all? Lmao. At least try to be consistent. Im not saying men cant have valid reasons for dating trouble. But the most vocal about it are the incel hate cultists.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:03 AM
1

You think that was a flex? Lolno. That was a refutation of your claim. Youre the only one claiming I dont have any experience here buddy, the mere fact you think your baseless assertion on this is a gotcha is quite telling. As for experience? Lol buddy, Im sure your incel ass has just as little if not less experience than you claim I do.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:57 PM
1

You got ghosted again. And yep. Youre definitely an incel if you think inceldom is remotely acceptable. They literally regularly advocate mandatory rape of little girls, children. Inceldom is a hate cult and nothing women do will ever make them acceptable.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:55 PM
1

Ooh, funnily enough your comment about mine getting ghosted got ghosted.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:48 PM
1

Sorry for not being the panopticon buddy. Lmao. I aint spending my life chasing down the slightest bit of sexism for your sake. Yes, they do have a habit of oversimplifying men's issues. But its not nearly as bad as youre making it out to be. Certainly not if you word it respectfully with a proper argument. Something you have shown yourself pathologically incapable of. But quite frankly, the bar to entry really genuinely is low for men and women both. The effort it takes to make and keep it is m…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:48 PM
1

Inceltears isnt really misandrist except when OP is overzealous. Happens sometimes. In that particular thread and that particular comment I would absolutely love to hear what stupid nonsense youll claim to make it out as me being misandrist because literally nothing hateful about that comment.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:37 PM
1

Please, explain to me exactly what is stupid about that comment. No, really. Please elaborate. I wanna hear your shitty excuses. Your desperation to blame amuses me.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:34 PM
1

The fact your imagination stops there says more about you than me.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:31 PM
0

Oh well. Whatever.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 02:09 PM
0

It is malicious when you actively twist them in the worst way while at it. The search bar only helps if you have direct quotes.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 02:09 PM
0

Im not awful. You are. You have nothing but half remembered assumptions and assertions. You know nothing about me yet act like you have me all figured out. Honestly? Its kinda sad.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 02:07 PM
2

The dog is being such a sweetie. Tbf, he does sound a little bit butthurt. But that could just be annoyance because he was prepping and then the doggo gets it. But yea, these people are really getting mad that a guy wanted to help but got aborted. Like seriously? Thats just yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/04/26 11:50 PM
0

I say things that could be due to a thousand reasons and you only accept the worst one. Not even a suspicion or clarification, just... "ah, so you are awful" I could say I like trees and you'd turn it into "ah, so you want nature to consume us all." You cant win when nothing you say matters.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 10:24 AM
0

Have you ever looked through reddit comment history? Its like finding a needle in a haystack. So yes, thousands because that's what it feels like when its so easy to overshoot. Again, with the malicious misinterpretation.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 10:21 AM
1

I do that plenty. This guy just refuses to see it.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 10:20 AM
1

What is this even trying to say?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 10:19 AM
-1

Yeah.. the misandry isnt very strong here. Not sure I agree that some of these count. But it is there as a subtle undercurrent. It doesnt much matter where the idea comes from. Just whether its a good one. Why bitch that its a man? Thats deff misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 09:57 AM
1

No. But the opposite does exist and is a problem too. Just not the sub for it here.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 09:24 AM
1

Sorry I dont care to dig through a thousand comments to prove myself to an internet asshole who never cared for truth or goodwill.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:05 AM
24

How joyfully loving.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:04 AM
1

Right of course. Because grammar is such a fucking impactful thing. The hiding is for privacy, yes, stalkers are unlikely, yes. And ways around it are plentiful, yes. But better to take those steps because any path left open is better closed. Basic cybersecurity you dumbass. Ooh, backtracking is it? Because sparking an argument so you can mock me isnt intentional jackassery. No, couldnt be. Seriously, I at least treat you with basic goodwill and entertain your words as possibly well intentioned.…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:01 AM
42

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:49 AM
1

Oh boy. You really havent seen a thing, you poor naive thing. I admit I have made misjudged various times in the past. It happens. But at times, it has been OP who misjudged and there's nothing wrong with calling that out. But you have never cared to see more than the initial gaffe. And you, literally dont even entertain the possibility of anything else. Thats not most likely outcome, thats projection. I have tried to reason with you in the past, never once have you considered the possibility my…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:46 AM
1

You have never done anything but maliciously misinterpret my comments. Of course there's enough evidence to find when you dont even consider any alternatives and dont entertain anything but malice in my words. I have disagreed on some of these posts at times, as is my right. You have disagreed with me before, as is your right. I have been wrong and I have been right. It happens, it doesnt mean malice. But you just want someone to blame. But at least Im not trying to be an asshole about it. While…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:42 AM
1

I do it when I see it. I dont make a fucking schedule out of hunting it down and I comment in a lot of other places, burying it in a flood. See what I mean with malicious misinterpretation? I make a very clear statement, that can have plenty reasons and you assume the worst in an instant.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:32 AM
1

You got ghosted again.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:28 AM
1

Why do you think I stopped?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:24 AM
1

Judge me for what I say when I say it and what I mean to say with it. Thats normal human behaviour to me, talk about what they are actually saying instead of something they said thats unrelated. Also, privacy reasons. Dont want stalkers. Unlikely, but possible and frankly better cut off pre-emptive. And you dont have to be a judgemental, projecting jackass who is trying to find excuses to villainise me and assign me traits I dont have based on what they want to see, but here we are.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:23 AM
1

Oh, you mean the kind of shit like calling out misandry on the regular? Yes. Definitely proof im misandrist. This is exactly what I said you were doing. Assume based on nothing but scraps and projections. Im the villain to you because youre unwilling to see literally anything else.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:18 AM
1

Your comment got ghosted.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:15 AM
1

And you are presumptuous and judgmental on things you dont know shit about. You are literally assigning me cookie cutter asshole traits just because I dont always go with the flow. You know, like an asshole? Projecting much are you?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:04 AM
1

I thought that "lack of" would be easily inferred there buddy. Not a biggie tho. No, I actually hid my activity in all but a handful of subs because people keep using it to maliciously misrepresent me. Judge me for my actual words and actions. Not whatever you find an excuse for. And no, I am not gatekeeping shit. I sometimes disagree with a post and comment why, but that isnt gatekeeping unless I get militant about it. Now why the fuck are you bringing that up here when there's literally zero r…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:02 AM
1

Nope. Not at all. I can see why I might develop a reputation as such, but that is pretty much entirely made up of wrong assumptions and malicious misinterpretation of my words. So no. That doesnt resemble me at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:56 PM
1

Im saying it shouldnt. Though I didnt word it right.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:53 PM
0

Human connection.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:40 PM
2

Then society should be striving for a world that discourages it, rather than enforces it.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:09 PM
8

May they soon enjoy hell's brimstone.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 02:56 PM
3

I see nothing wrong with their logic. A single potentially made up example certainly speaks for the entire group. As it always does. Exceptions dont exist.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 02:42 PM
8

"Misandry doesnt exist" is a manifestation of misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/26 01:13 PM
4

Well, in order to legally classify rape you have to legally classify sex. There needs to be a definitive threshold between "this is just molestation" (bad but not rape) and "straight up rape." Or just "normal touching." And that needs to be clear to the law or you get shitty edgecase weirdness that screws people over. Belgian assault (nonsexual) for example only require unwanted touch, so tapping a stranger on the shoulder could get you arrested. The line needs to be drawn somewhere and then thi…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/26 01:43 AM
14

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/26 01:41 AM
7

No. You dont get to no true scotsman this. The misandrists run in your circles, speak with your voice and act with your authority. For every practical purpose, they are feminists. I really wish the movement stuck true to your ideals, but it doesnt. Start calling out misandry in feminist spaces and see how quickly they turn against you. Even if its mild. One way or another, feminism is a breeding ground for misandry and rhetoric like yours suppresses and invalidates actual effective motion agains…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/26 01:33 AM
13

In practice, they often are the same. The issue with feminism is that its inherently biased. The founding principles were women's rights and gender equality. But no mention of men's rights. Thus, it has evolved into something frotesque that glorifies women's rights and condemned men's rights. I wish it wasnt true, but feminists are most frequently the ones spouting misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 09:15 AM
13

This bitch: men say feminists hate men. This is a lie. Also this bitch: this is why you should hate men.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 09:13 AM
57

There is no hate like a feminazi's love for men.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/26 04:58 PM
1

Systemic is different from systematic. Systematic means that the system is designed for it, something that thoroughly ensures it wherever it can. Systemic is something that exists as a side effect of the system. For example, the system of capitalism isnt designed to suppress the poor, but its nature of encouraging wealth-seeking means that starving others of theirs is a natural response. A systemic action encouraged, but not enforced by the system. Systematic is very easy to prove. Just a yes/no…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/26 03:21 PM
2

Everyone risks their safety when getting involved with another person.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/26 12:58 PM
1

Now THAT is a good argument. There is no point about it where I disagree. But it still doesnt argue against my point about what it is at its foundation.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/26 08:54 AM
0

Says you.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 09:27 PM
1

... which is not something I argued against to begin with. Hence, not at all, an argument against anything I said.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 07:43 PM
1

I fail to see how that relates to my argument or is, in any way, a rebuke to any of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 06:28 PM
-6

That is what its corrupted into, yes. But by fundamental nature it doesnt need to be. Thats the point I was making.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 05:02 PM
1

Ditto.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 02:53 PM
1

Ditto.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 02:40 PM
1

Try reading the rest of my argument first. I dont give a shit what you intended to say. What you actually said isnt that. Now stop acting like a chatgpt with memory issues.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 02:31 PM
2

There are a thousand comparisons you could have made that wouldnt carry inherent bias and revulsion. Yet you chose nazis. Maybe you are autistic and dont think that way, but the implications are present and meaningful to most people nonetheless. As for the rest of it, yes. Its very hard to talk to someone who willingly ignores what youre telling them.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 02:13 PM
2

... facepalm wow, way to ignore every important point I made and get stuck on trivialities. I talked about about all religion, because all religions have this issue. But I actually did make specific points about christianity. But you didnt actually read my argument, you just skimmed it for things to bitch about. No comparison to nazi's is without vitriol. Especially not the way you worded it. You were talking about chosen identity, but you talked as if they were the same thing. A blatant agenda.…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 01:56 PM
-6

My dude, you made a direct comparison with no distinction or direction in how. Im not psychic enough to read your mind, so Im gonna take it in a cautious manner. If you didnt mean "they are similar" when making it, you should have specified that. Rather than saying its the same and letting me go from there. And you are, again, ignoring something critical. I was speaking about "fundamentally" feminism is, at the core of it, not an inherently bad ideology. Inherently biased? Yes. Overshooting in p…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 01:39 PM
-13

You are ignoring a major difference. The nazi ideology is fundamentally built on aryan supremacy and discrimination. That makes it inherently hostile to everyone else. Feminism is founded on the biased rule of gender equality and women's rights. Neither of which are inherently bad. Unlike Nazi's. The issue is that its biased and thus could lead to nazi-like behaviour if taken too far. But fundamentally, it isnt corrupt or wrong. You can get at them for being biased, for fighting for equality and…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 01:15 PM
-17

Feminism like this, yes. Its important not to paint them all with the same brush like they do here.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 11:01 AM
46

Wow. Some people are really braindead enough that mutual hate isnt a thing that can exist?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/26 05:51 PM
8

🤢🤮
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/26 02:43 PM
0

Misogyny takes on a different flavor but its just as bad. "No decent women exist" is not actually that far from incel rhetoric and they spout stuff like "women should be sex slaves" and that sort of yikes. I try to be sympathetic to everyone. Understand all point of view and argue the unargued points. So blindspots may be covered. I consider it a form of public service. I dont want this place to become an incel echochamber. So I try to voice the missing sentiment. Optimism can also do some good.…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 11:16 PM
-2

The opposite is also true. Its not a gender thing
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 08:23 AM
0

Obviously appearance matters. Everyone likes good looks, its basically in the definition. But it really doesnt extend that far. Not even close. So yes, it does matter. Because while there are bitches who will take everything as an offense, most people just... arent. Whether you are accidentally leaking your antipathy or theyre too paranoid is secondary. Its generalising hostility, the same we get at them for here. Not really relevant, bit in a fit of irony, "women only care about good looks" is …
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 08:22 AM
6

Well said. I honestly think women are simply raised too paranoid and then further encouraged by feminist victim complex. And like, sure there's still misogyny floating around even in the most progressive countries. But it really isnt nearly as bad as they say. Any amount is bad, yes. But for the most part theyre doing fine. The issue is not speaking out against misogyny. Its the encouragement of misandry and oppression of voices against misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 12:12 AM
1

More girls than boys being born is at best a neutral thing. Unless it hits extreme levels I dont know if or how it falls much below that, either. What IS awful though is the misandry they spout in those comment fields.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 11:57 PM
0

Fair. But all things considered, "women go for toxic chad, not 'nice guys'" is THE stereotypical incel argument and pretty close to what you said.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 02:03 PM
-1

Maybe thats true in your case. But thats still such a massive incel argument.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 11:51 AM
6

Bruh the whole point of Carrie is that its a crashout where she goes way too far. Also, arent carrie's bullies girls? I know next to nothing about it lel.q
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 01:06 AM
1

Its a genre? News to me. That does explain how it fits here though.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 07:18 PM
-4

Thats just about angry women. It needs context to aim and shape it into something misandrist. Though its fairly hard to shape into something that isnt.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 06:23 PM
-1

These are all awful. Except the last one ig? That one's more sketch than straight up misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 06:10 PM
1

I hope he gets to see just how bad misandry gets.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/26 02:35 PM
2

Ah. Reddit hid it. Ive edited it in anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 08:26 AM
15

What a bunch of twisted fucks.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 08:25 AM
0

See other response.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/03/26 08:09 AM
-37

Most of these are awful. 3 depends on context though. 1 is more about empowering women than hating men and the feminism one only looks at the founding principle rather than the facts. Edit: okay, I somehow missed the fact 1 had a man as heel. My bad.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/03/26 02:34 PM
2

Oh wow. The us is even worse than I thought.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 10:14 PM
1

Well, the simplest way to prove sex is pregnancy. For simplicity's sake, lets ignore all others. If we count only pregnancies from rape, we would expect a much higher tally of female victims. For the simple reason that female perps wouldnt be reporting it. For obvious reasons.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 09:48 PM
2

Crying is definitely a bit oddly extreme, but still. To hate on him for it is just... yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 07:11 PM
10

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 03:17 PM
8

Rape babies naturally skew the statistic even beyond that, lets be real here.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 09:41 AM
11

Showing your appreciation once in a while is great for morale. Keeps it going when it matters.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 07:37 AM
1

Hm. Try reflecting it next time? Often times such things become blatantly obvious when you see someone else do it.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 07:24 AM
16

Yep. They use it interchangibly. If it was just "the patriarchy" I wouldnt have nearly the same issue because that word is at least generally aimed at the top.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 07:35 AM
37

If that were true, you'd be calling it the patriarchy instead of the demographic. But no, its men as a whole. Really, even at the best case scenario its malicious language and word choice from them.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 01:42 AM
1

I never argued it wasnt. And yes, that is a valid argument. So is mine. Theyre not incompatible.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 05:33 PM
1

If any statistic shows a hundred percent anything, its almost certainly fake. There's always someone, after all.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 04:49 PM
2

A better source, sure. But that doesnt address the fact biological facts would kinda skew this to mothers anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 04:44 PM
1

Right. So, unless there's a mistake in the definition that excludes the father, the statistics are outright ignoring men who do so. Which is almost certainly less than the women who do so, (babies get dumped on the mother by default, thats just biology) but definitely higher than zero. Regardless, its just... not a very good statistic to argue with due to inherent bias. Rape pregnancies arent either, for a flipside example. Either way, just kinda... stupid to argue about due to biological limits…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 04:23 PM
1

Got a source?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 04:04 PM
1

Are you talking abt abortion?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 03:25 PM
12

People really do be advertising their blatant hypocrisy huh? Did you typo lgbt in the title or did you intentionally randomise?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/26 08:29 AM
14

Have you told her off?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/26 08:25 AM
1

Actually... why am I arguing with someone who thinks its okay to knowingly and intentionally hurt people? Someone who actively and knowingly spouts nazi style rhetoric? If someone's knowingly and willingly evil, you cant talk em out of it. I gave you so many chances to at least consider what I said but nah. Go live a horrible life.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/26 01:13 AM
1

My real example is this sub. But hey, trauma and emotional damage is just hurt feelings.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/26 12:42 AM
1

Oh, so berating and killing are the only way to do oppression huh? Guess rape is fine then. Guess dismissing your trauma is fine then. I can go on for a while.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 10:09 PM
1

Becauze feminists are oppressed. 😂. Sure, keep telling yourself that. You dont get lynched for spouting literal hate. Mra gets lynched for existing.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 10:08 PM
1

Literally no. Everything you just said is wrong. We are literally in the sub that shows you how. If you called it "misanthropy" I could agree. But its not misogyny when its aimed at men.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 10:07 PM
1

Just because you dont see it doesnt mean it isnt there. Isnt that the whole point of activism? To fight back against the oppressors, make yourself known? Besides, who said anything about cis, white or straight?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 08:54 PM
1

And you have none to tell me about the misandry men face. Yet you dismiss that anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 08:53 PM
1

Guess MRA have a right to get violent with feminists then.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 08:52 PM
1

Men arent your oppressors. They are a supergroup including your oppressors. You unironically spout this hate and then are surprised MRA exists. I also edited my last post to be better.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 08:00 PM
1

The nazi's too, would say they are "ACTUALLY oppressed." Nazi's are amongst the least sketch group to hate, but even in that group innocents get caught up and forced into it. But they are explicitly a hate group, whilst male is something you are always born as. Some people are born to nazi's too, hating them is sketchier, but they get the choice to quit. Men dont. Again, it doesnt matter how true it is. Just that you have the same core belief that you are oppressed and spout the same core rhetor…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 07:55 PM
1

You are supporting such sentiment with your words and actions. Hate is a powerful word and men is a very broad one. This is how nazi's started. Telling you off for building the foundations they built upon is justified always. You choose to go for maximum collateral with your rhetoric and sentiment. You choose to hurt your allies. Then you backtrack and say you didnt hurt your allies because your allies are the exception, even as you keep stabbing them with collareral. Hating a group, any group, …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 07:07 PM
1

Learn to have a memory, I have literally explained this several times already. You can hate your oppresssors but the splash damage is wrong. Regardless of how you go about it, your actions and sentiment support genocidal rhetoric. Thus, is wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 07:02 PM
1

Im saying that the core belief is the same. That they are oppressing you and thus hating them is justified. Whether or not you actually are is irrelevant.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:59 PM
1

You really should give this sub a proper look around. We are literally on the page of a source for men being oppressed.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:57 PM
1

Im not asking you to bend the knee to men. Im not asking you to not hate the tateists who support your oppression. Im asking you not to hate men. For that is a group far, far larger than your oppressors. The nazi's too, believed themselves oppressed by jews hoarding all the money and making them poor. Thats literally why they hate jews. It literally is comparable.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:56 PM
1

Disagree on that. But yes, dont accept oppression when you see it. Hence, Im arguing against you.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:53 PM
1

I will compare all hate groups. Because they are all equivalent. Feel free to replace nazi and jew with literally any other group. But its the same sentiment. Sure, nazi's are an extreme example, but same core. Not hating someone specific of a given group doesnt make it any better. Hate is hate. The end. Youre still not hating your oppressors but the ones designated as hatesink by your oppressors. As well as many innocents. There is no such thing as selective hate. Unless you believe in Terry's …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:51 PM
1

You are though. You demand men fight for women's rights. Not support, not vote for, fight. Fighting is a word used for soldiers risking their lives. Spending it for the cause. Fighting is maximum commitment.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:48 PM
1

Thats literally not how hate works. Hate is indiscriminate to the entire group. You said that. Making exceptions doesnt make that not so. Exceptions you make are not exceptions others make. Say you have a brother who supports women's rights. You wont hate on him, sure. But some random feminist lady will hate on him for being a man because A) she doesnt know B) she doesnt think he does enough. C) she just hates men, the end. Hate targets everyone by default. You can dodge some of it, reduce it he…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:46 PM
1

Aha, but by your own logic if youre not actively fighting against it, youre to blame. Hence fuck you for supporting the shitty japanese justice system. You are voting for them but not actively fighting for them! You are to blame for their suffering! Do you not see the point? Most people will do what they think is right and justice and shit. But they wont spend their life on it. You cant demand that of people.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:42 PM
1

Maybe you dont. But others do. You are supporting such sentiments by calling yourself proud misandrist. I have literally seen feminazi's exclaim that all men should be enslaved or caged or whatever just for being men. Thats just hatred and making people suffer for the sake of it. Maybe you dont support such evil means, but that doesnt mean your words dont carry weight and pave the road for such.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:35 PM
1

Hate is wrong because its hate. The why doesnt matter, just that its hate. That has innocent victims and thus is wrong. How are you so stupid as to not understand that innocent victims = bad? You... clearly dont see how misandry actually works. It works the same as misogyny, a thousand little things that stack up to an unbearable weight. If you actually paid attention to this sub instead of being a judgemental shitstain you would know. Thats how prejudice manifests. Period.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:32 PM
1

Lets see... jews, palestinians, eco conservation everything, including veganism, atheists (in religious majority nations), all the immigrant groups, oh and to up the unrelated factor! Chinese in china, the broken japanese work and justice system, all the poor everywhere, literally everything really. People do not owe you their lives you absolute shitstain of a human being.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:29 PM
1

Its ranting because its ranting. Just because it was about misogyny doesnt change that. Oh right. Thats why ignoring men being raped by women and berating them for talking about it is a-okay!
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:26 PM
1

*drives you to suicide and has its consequences ignored. Corrected that for you. If you think hate is okay because your victims dont suffer as much as you do, (debatable tbh), then I dont know what to tell you buddy. Hurting people is never okay.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:24 PM
1

The part where you rant about injustices and blame people uninvolved in it for them? Nah. Its irrelevant to the point. I have never denied misogyny and women's issues. The fact you think so says more about you than anything. I just also deny misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:21 PM
1

Black was just the first thing to pop to mind. Just one quick example out of all the good causes. If you dont spend your everything on fighting for all of em, you are evil.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 06:19 PM
1

Thats not how responsibility works lol. So tell you what, if thats how it works then you are to blame for all the hate crimes against black people because youre too busy hating men to fight for them.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 05:52 PM
1

Except youre not hating the tateists. Youre hating all men. When most men arent tateists. Those men you are hating on for no reason. Heck, its all the rich playing fuck fuck games anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 05:36 PM
1

Bro doesnt know how scaling works. Little things add up especially when whales get involved. But buddy, you know that misandry is a significant driver for that kind of atittude? They cant be happy so they look for a solution, tateism and shit offers an easy out. The left often responds with "how dare a man have issues." Heck, you call yourself a proud misandrist. You wonder why any man would want to stand with you?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 05:27 PM
1

Because the silent majority does say fuck him, but they quickly move on after that. Its not their life to hate on this one random asshole. Thats too much effort, too distant and too meaningless when there's so many other dickweeds. Compared to the vocal minorities who make hatred their entire lifestyle. If you want something done about tate, find a way to do so and ask the silent majority for support. You will find it.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 02:31 PM
1

Oooh, is that a strawman in your first few sentences? Because I sure as shit argued nothing the like. If you actually looked around here, you would see the sub is more about men being raped by women often being considered a good thing. That sort of shit. Misogyny is awful, yes. But that doesnt mean misandry isnt. They are not incompatible, which is why shitheads like you who are proud misandrists are an issue. Media that disrespects men is everywhere, you are making an enemy of someone who shoul…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 02:28 PM
1

Ofc Tate the whiny bitch has an effect. So does every influencer. But the silent majority thinks he's a stupid ass. You just dont see it because its much easier to notice the vocal minority. Also, music that says the word bitch and/or hoe is really not a biggie compared to actual issues.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 02:21 PM
1

Im not from the us either, it really isnt the gotcha you act like it is.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 02:19 PM
1

r/usdefaultism
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 01:55 PM
3

"One country out of over 200" "not minority." Lol ok. Buddy, if you actually used your eyes to look for something other than vitriol, you will find it. Because quite frankly, if you look for something, you will find it. No matter if its true or not.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 01:20 PM
3

Riiiight. You mean the incel corner, that loud minority nobody actually likes and media about the rough edges of society where looking tough is a necessity. Because we all know, the 1% is representative of the 100%! Thats why its the 1(00)% after all!
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 12:03 PM
3

"You literally said blacks" proceeds not to give an argument. I can see behaviour excused, but music and media preference? Lmao. Youre a riot. It seems youve caught stupidity and Im afraid its terminal.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 11:05 AM
4

That people hate on men for being men? Aka, prejudice, discrimination, sexism, misandry, whatever the fuck you wanna call it. The stereotycal bad person thing to do? From the rest of your comments, you really do support that shit. Tells me everything I need to know.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/26 08:06 AM
18

God forbid men act silly.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 11:12 PM
0

I think that is a lot more gender equal than it seems. Probably. Although yes, typically a woman thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 12:48 PM
0

Fair. That comes at the cost of direct control and authority though. Gotta lean on others for that. Distance brings safety. That does have its downsides. So more an even thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 12:36 PM
5

Its a pseudo-minority. Not like, numbers wise. But when it comes to power up top? Yeah women are relatively rare. Used to be much worse, enough that the thing that makes "minority" a thing that matters applied. Not anymore tho, not really. Still, as above so below does not apply here. The patriarchy is shattered in every way that matters. Now its just the rich who are traditionalist pricks. A small, but powerful holdout. That they conflate that with all men.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 12:28 PM
5

Their justification is because its the "majority" the talk already happens in the majority. Thats ignoring the fact that thats exactly what theyre shutting down like that. The majority talking to itself about this topic. Literally just "silence wretch! You dont get to speak."
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 12:00 PM
9

I mean, a voice of the contrarian is good. Keeps you from getting a big head and points out issues. But those are not your fucking issues, you dont know or experience them. (Unless youre trans ig, but those are a weird case anyways.) You dont know them, you havent experienced them.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 10:01 AM
2

Strictly speaking, its not really wrong. It doesnt quite victim blame, but it definitely isnt sympathetic to men either. It kinda ignores that men are struggling after an offhand comment. When it shoulda shown some sympathy.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/02/26 01:25 PM
2

Again, stripping context to the point of meaninglessness is the point. The point is that its currently oppressed.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 10:28 AM
10

Thats rather the point. If you ignore history and context in one place, also the other.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 05:32 PM
3

Everyone deserves equality. Or itll just perpetuate misery. Hurt people hurt people and all that.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 10:06 AM
11

Richard is actually right here, a broken clock and all that. Chivalry is some complex code if honour about how to simp right and generally putting women first. This lady is either ignorant or knowingly advocating female supremacy. Or both.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 10:04 AM
117

"Men commit more crime so its okay to hate them, statistics dont lie." Replace "men" with "blacks" and see how that works out buddy.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 07:34 PM
2

Did you report em to reddit?
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 03:22 PM
9

Oh no. That is right around the corner. What do we even do. (Monotone sarcasm)
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 02:01 PM
33

From my understansing, the Y chromosome is shrinking because its getting rid of unnecessary bits. But yeah, these fucks really just want humanity extinct huh?
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 11:55 AM
7

I vote option D. All of the above.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 11:18 AM
9

Honestyl. The diagram would be better if it was all "group consisting of men and women both."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/26 01:15 PM
1

Yes. I mentioned that in the second paragraph. I just didnt go back to edit it to be primary focus.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/26 11:12 PM
1

... that must be why I didnt say first one at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:42 AM
1

I was talking about the fucking images. Smartass.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:39 AM
-1

Well, you cant argue with those whove judged you evil before they ever even considered your words. Bye. Im not dealing with your bullshit and flat out malice.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:38 AM
-1

Unless there is negative text or more that is cut off, thats not what it says. Implies? A little. But only if you come at it with malice in mind. Would it suprise me if she did? No. But looking at the actual words, there is no such thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:34 AM
-1

It would from me. Regardless, we shouldnt stoop to their level.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:32 AM
1

Bit of a stretch imo.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/26 02:48 AM
-1

Fair enough.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/02/26 05:51 PM
-4

Maybe in the cut off context? She specifies wealthy men. Which can either go eat the rich or kill all men depending on interpretation, but it does buy some leeway from what I see. It also, isnt factually all that wrong since there were a fuck ton of wealthy men in there.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/02/26 05:39 PM
8

The first two comments arent that bad. But the rest, especially the last one, definitely needs to learn about the only female chinese empress in history.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/02/26 04:57 PM
7

"Listens to rap music." Truly, an unforgiveble sin. (I dont like rap music, but really lady?)
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/26 04:34 PM
2

Officially, it fights for gender equality. Less officially, it fights for women's rights. An admirable goal still. In the creaking corners of fucked upness, it fights for matriarchy. Its important to recognise the nuance.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 10:29 AM
0

Because men's rights groups have a rep for being turned into incel groups. They believe "mens rights" and incel are synonyms. Or thin veils for the latter.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 07:31 PM
-1

Thats the excuse, yes. But society isnt handling its current population well, why the fuck do you want to add more meat to the grinder so bad? The rich just want their cheap laborers. An unloved child is worse off than one not born. Allow abortion, improve quality of life for everyone. Its that simple.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 03:51 PM
-1

Lol. No. Banning abortion is just another shitty fuss kicked up by the 1% to distract people from the real issues they cause.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 09:28 PM
0

Bold of you to assume I expected anything else.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:27 PM
1

I dont care about your opinion either. But this was aimed at me in spirit, at the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:26 PM
0

Despite being a reply to that guy, I have no doubt its also aimed at me. I literally do this.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:07 PM
0

You post on a public forum. You know what to expect.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:05 PM
15

Not that there might not be missing context that justifies this response, but this comes off as just raging out because they basically said a slightly flirty hi.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 10:29 AM
-1

Why does everyone assume Im a girl? Lol. Now youre doing the same thing that the feminazis do. Dismiss the other side's problems as nonexistent. Ironic.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:18 AM
2

Wow, way to do a malicious interpretation.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:26 AM
2

This has already been discussed, you are literally just here to bitch for the sake of bitching. Fuck you too.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:24 AM
2

Hmhm. Strike me more as a cheap excuse than anything. But youve held great integrity so far, so Ill give you benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:20 PM
1

Nah, I just let it drop straight down. The avatar's is just the closest I could find. I flat out dont give a shit about gender norms. I treat everyone the same, regardless of what they are. Period. Myself included. Im me. Male, female. No category more arbitrary and meaningless. Though some match it.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:13 PM
2

I just like having long hair lol. Now who's stereotyping men?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:09 PM
7

"Not all women are so bad, my mom's pretty alright."
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:08 PM
2

Not even a woman. I just think youre wrong.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:06 PM
1

Assumptive as always. Hate is wrong, always. Thats the end of that. Hate the ones who hurt you, specifically. Not the whole female sex.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:02 PM
12

You make good points that I will take into consideration for the future. That said, what you did isnt exactly so different.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:00 PM
4

Then why did your assumptive ass delete your comments?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:57 PM
1

Oh? An alt? Isnt this the original commenter that spawned this? Explains the hate and vitriol. The fuck is that analogy even trying to say?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:54 PM
5

Neither do feminists go preach on incel forums. Same reason, it would just get you banned. That said, speaking up against it when you come across it in the wild is another thing entirely. Which I do for both misandry and misogyny. As well as other forms of prejudice. Meanwhile, youre the one acting like theyre the fucking authority. I just slapped down a very strong "no, this is wrong." Heck, what you did really isnt that different you fucking hypocrite.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:51 PM
-3

Your reply vanished.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:45 PM
-12

Perhaps that is so. But regardless, I reserve the right to say no to that shit. I came in strong, perhaps too strong. If that had been your angle, I would be agreeing with you. But no, the point youre making is that I shouldnt speak against misogyny at all. Which is just fucked up. Hypocritical too, given your reply line.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:40 PM
-35

Buddy, if we dont at least discourage misogyny this will soon enough become just another incel corner that proves their hatred right. Equality comes from both sides. We cant applaud misogyny or we become just like these twitter shitstains. This is not the place to talk about misogyny in depth, no. But that doesnt mean we should tolerate it.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:16 PM
-43

Okay, no. Fuck that rhetoric. Plenty cool women. Dont be misogynystic.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:07 PM
1

Pure unadulturated stupidity.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/26 10:12 AM
3

Pleass post the vid eithout linking insta. It demands I make an account for that dumpsterfire and thats just yikes.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/26 01:27 PM
1

Shit's fucked.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 06:41 PM
1

Not from the pit of eternal despair where Alrakthur the formlezs horror is imprisoned, I hope?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 04:51 PM
1

Wait. Where did we get the genetic information from again?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 04:49 PM
1

[We keep training a lot of octopi]
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 03:52 PM
1

Alright, lets getto it!
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 02:59 PM
35

Seriously? These people are yikes. Animals arent helpless. Unless you really fucking push them.into the metaphorical corner.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 02:10 PM
1

Most of it is hate, misandry and fuck men rhetoric, but the actual tips on img 4 are pretty good. Mostly.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 11:43 AM
1

Entire generations? For eternity?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 10:50 AM
1

Sounds great. How does that help?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:40 AM
1

They are an important foundation of the ecosystem Im afraid. What are we gonna replace them with?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:36 AM
1

So long as we skip mosquitos too.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:26 AM
1

Yep. No girls here. Ah well, they had cooties anyways.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:24 AM
1

Lets get forging. I guess in this new world, girls arent real.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:22 AM
1

We need a world first, we were protected by being a cosmological constant. The kids wont be. Whats your sex anyways? Its kinda important here. Im male.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:17 AM
1

... wanna make a new world? This time with an automatic repeating chain!
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:15 AM
1

Oh wait shit! We broke the chain! Man, seriously? After so many eternities!
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:14 AM
1

Anyways, want a cookie?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 01:09 AM
1

An endless amount of eternities pass, the chain remains unbroken. Though gods may fall and worlds may die, the chain remains unbroken. Such is the blessing of stupidity.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 12:32 AM
1

[Steve suddebly breaks in and breaks the endless chain]
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 12:29 AM
1

[One infinity of repeats]
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 12:08 AM
3

It happens sometimes.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 12:07 AM
1

[Argument repeats]
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 11:45 PM
1

[Repeats the conversation again]
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 11:17 PM
1

The fact its confusing without.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 10:15 PM
1

Really? I never would have guessed.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 09:58 PM
4

Read the pic before the title and was confused for a bit. That title is deff necessary context.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 09:57 PM
3

I think its a "women's matter" or smth.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 07:51 PM
4

Arent men generally kicked out of the delivery room?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 06:35 PM
11

Based.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/26 07:50 PM
6

Fair enough. That one's better. But yea, if you get hit with OOP's opening you definitely have the right to something snarky.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/26 06:49 PM
7

"Clearly, mine would need to be far too low to be with you."
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/26 04:27 PM
1

Understandable. That doesnt make it better, but I understand.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 03:15 PM
2

Dude, this is back to being misogyny. Youre generalising women, which is an issue. Just as generalising men is. Reflecting the issue back to them just makes it worse.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 03:08 PM
1

Fucking hell. Why are men's issues a fucking taboo.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 02:13 PM
3

They do, in fact, want to do that. Because nuance is for the enemy.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 12:05 PM
1

Only the job bit is actually bad. The height is slightly sketch, but yeah. The job bit is a massive red flag. Also, the fact she's askin her fans to find someone who fits the criteria. That too. But overall? Surprisingly reasonable on most fields.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 08:24 PM
7

Not the same but they often come packaged together.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/26 09:11 AM
5

If you are only taught one thing, of course it will be pervasive in all you know.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/26 09:09 AM
1

Pretty sure thays sarcasm.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 08:20 AM
25

That says more about society than boys, dear misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/26 06:04 PM
10

Well, OOOP was really fishing for that kinda shit with that question and that defiant ginger woman edit of the meme. Really, couldnt bias the sample size further if I tried.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 09:49 AM
-1

Thats the "look at this clown, doesnt see the obvious flaws in their point" response.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/26 02:31 PM
1

Using shorthands is fine. Just make sure your shorthands arent this. Because it is, in fact, this you can go fuck yourself with a chainsaw OOP.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/26 12:00 PM
1

Best case, its just sexual sadism or smth. The self awareness is certainly a good sign.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/26 09:03 AM
-11

I think the "male loneliness epidemic" is a term coined by incels? Who, of course. Blame lack of sex and thus loneliness as the cause of every problem in the world. So yea, dont expect it to be a good term.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 10:45 PM
3

Ofc not. That would go against their narrative.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/26 05:35 PM
8

Nit anymore she aint. If we get stuck in the past we'll never move into the future.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 07:08 PM
3

Not rlly. Most people default to apathy to people they dont know. Radicals however, default to hatred and vitriol to everyone who doesnt support them. Apathy is earned. Love is only given at submission.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 06:44 PM
1

mfw implying that men care about anything except sex and power. Thinking otherwise is MEHSOHCKGENIE!!!! /s
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 06:39 PM
4

Dont sweat it. I understand your assumptions, there's a fair chance I would have as well. Huh. This is the first time someone has actually been understanding when I pointed out autism is bad at social cues.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:39 PM
4

Actually, Ill blame autism. Not picking up social cues is part of the package. If you actually look at my comment history youll find plenty of my comments are telling people off for misandry. Easily verified.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:20 PM
-7

I always considered "the patriarchy" to be the name of the social/cultural norm of men being head of the household. Which is in fact, a real thing.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 08:03 AM
2

I mean, the only reasonable compromise would have been to slap a romantic getaway on the tail end of it, after he finishes work. But thats something either of them coulda proposed. Nah, the girl is in the wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/26 10:16 AM
-5

Eh. Its more about using females to refer to women more as a general. I dont think its a stretch to estimate from the sub that they would say men. Its a little inaccurate, sure. But I dont want another nontoxic men's rights sub to become an incel containment zone so imma be a bit vigilant about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 11:09 PM
-10

r/menandfemales
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 10:44 PM
15

Hot damn. How arent they dizzy from.all thos emental gymnastics? Oh. Wait.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/25 10:16 PM
2

Probably the part where everyone agreed to keep hush about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 08:49 AM
6

No love is truly unconditional. Love comes from trust and understanding. Which relies on you being familiar with that person. If you cant be trusted, people wont love you no matter how familiar you are. If you arent known and understood, no matter how trustworthy you are, nobody will care. "Unconditional love" is just love based on solid amounts of both of those. The kind based on your personality and generally just being who you are. Withholding love for the first two reasons is valid. Withhold…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 08:31 AM
1

Yes. That was the joke.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/25 11:13 AM
4

Ladies, its okay to be gay. You can just say that instead.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/25 11:26 AM
1

Yes. Maybe they shoulda.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 04:49 PM
3

There's a 50/50 of quotation marks being sarcasm indicators.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 10:31 AM
2

Yes. The context makes it unfun. But the comment itself is funny. Or would be, in a different context.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 10:30 AM
4

Okay, but the bit about spilling rage is genuinely kinda funny. Stupid af, but thats why its funny.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/25 09:16 AM
3

And this is misandry related how? The quotation marks in the title are sus.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 11:44 AM
15

Lady, just admit to yourself that youre lesbian.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 07:35 PM
1

Classism is an issue, yes. But it is an issue seperate from sexism. Do they feed into eachother? Sure. But that doesnt mean you can declare them equivalent like this.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/12/25 02:28 PM
16

We arent saying those men arent in the wrong... But if you push away the middle ground dont be surprised when everyone stands on the other side.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 12:20 AM
1

I was not. You explicitly asked for clarification. I provided the clarification and explanation of my viewpoint. I did not even adress your argument because it was founded on a lack of understanding and adressed by my clarification. Though, I probably should have worded it to adress it more directly. Regardless, the core stands strong. So long as you oppress the out group, you are stifling your own. Women's issues are something that people talk about openly, men's arent. Thats why they seem in c…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/25 01:43 PM
6

Women who aren't trash understand the statement women are trash doesn't apply to them. If your argument can be turned around and be just as solid are shitty arguments.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 06:28 PM
4

Do be careful though, the undesirables are tricky and like to hide from their rightful extinction. So we gotta watch our population carefully and make sure none of those darn undesirables sneak in. It doesnt matter what the people think, its for their own good. Anyways, enjoy true freedom! Surely no one would abuse such a benevolent system?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 09:42 AM
1

When you make a statement about the out group, you make an implicit statement about the in-group. Taking a classic example, "women are too emotional" well, the misogyny in it is very obvious, stating that women just arent logical and their thoughts can be dismissed for it. But it also implicitly states that men are not emotional, that they shouldnt feel or express things. Which is the core root of everyday misandry, the unwillingness to acknowledge men's problems that you just so aptly demonstra…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 09:25 AM
1

I agree. But I didnt make the definitions.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 11:28 AM
6

Men suffer under that too. A statement about the other reflects back upon the self. The misogyny of the likes of "women are too emotional" is obvious, but it also carries the implications that men arent allowed to be emotional or feel. While the prev poster did it wrong and made it into a suffering race, he isnt wrong that in most western nations dont really have a female equivalent to circumcision. Prev was wrong to making it men have it worse rhetoric, but you are wrong for arguing its reflect…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 01:28 PM
-5

If done properly it is. This however, is female supremacy talk.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 01:23 PM
4

Yep. The treatment is different, but shitty either way. Shitty in different ways.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 12:53 PM
1

I dont think misogyny is entirely a fringe outcast group, but all the vocal ones definitely are. Rather, I think the main feeder for misogyny is ironically misandry. If women are emotional, men are rational. Simple comparison. Now, we are saying women are rational too. But if women are emotional AND rational but men are still just rational, then women are still emotional in comparison. Its an equal and opposite reaction. All are equal, or no-one is.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 12:50 PM
4

I think its more about treatment than rights. Because yea, the culture of patriarchy is hella toxic and though no longer having a legal standard, that doesnt mean the culture vanished. Its fading, slowly. But not gone. But then again, misogyny and misandry are two sides of the same coin. Any comment on one sex makes and implicit comment about the other. Either everyone is equal, or no one is. No inbetween or exceptions are possible.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 12:33 PM
8

Misogyny and misandry are two sides of the same coin. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. One cannot be greater than the other because they are the same thing. Example: "women are way too emotional." Misogyny: women are unbalanced and irrational. Misandry: men shouldnt feel emotions. So long as there are differences between treatment, both must exist.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/25 12:22 PM
3

Tools are accepted at least. Which isnt a good standard by any means, but its something.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 10:19 PM
1

Given societal attitude, I wouldnt be surprised if men being raped or generally women doing rape was so significantly underreported that they were only about 20% or so. Now, Im not sure if your comment is because you didnt read mine properly, or a rebuke as in, "youre wrong." But restating it doesnt hurt either way.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 02:49 AM
1

18% of recorded cases. Always remember survivor's bias in statistics. OOP really refused to so much as consider what the remaining 82% would contain. Like holy shit.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 02:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter