TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Auldreekie Archive

View 0 posts and 237 comments by Auldreekie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Well, I follow him on twitter and I vote Tory. He is a conservative, he gets tweeted death threats from the left on a daily basis for "being a monster".
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:50 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bhpXhxP-WU
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:03 PM
2

I hate to do this but when someone is being so smug and avoiding every single point raised I have to point out the fact that you cannot use "to" and "too" correctly, nor can you use "new" and "Knew" for that matter. Maybe that's why you despise the educated, enjoy your own box.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:11 PM
2

Umm I don't think you understand what this is exactly. This is a DEBATE over whether or not our sentencing is sexist, nobody is deciding anything about laws or how people should be punished or for what crimes. examining the tendencies of people on both sides of the coin. Why do you keep saying "tendencies"? I don't think you know what it means. What do you think they will say on the matter anyway? The MOJ collects stats of all of the prisoners and they use them to judge the effectiveness of the …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:59 PM
2

Well, if you can find a public space that will fit 60 million people and can find a way for everyone to get a chance to speak without interrupting each other and allowing everyone to "display human tendencies" then I will elect you PM.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:40 PM
6

Or at least don't display these average human tendencies when they should.. Huh?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:38 PM
5

in a park This is England, it's raining right now. I feel they should have more say Well, it's a representative democracy. If everyone voted on every issue nothing would ever get done and there would never be any consensus on the overall direction to take. by the people truly affected and living through these parts So you want prisoners to decide how we deal with prisoners? Noble but perhaps misguided. I don't know, your concerns seem trivial, there are plenty of African parliaments that are muc…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:29 PM
7

Yeah, and then you have these lovely creatures in the LibDems and Labour; Lynne Featherstone; Speaking at the Liberal Democrat conference Featherstone blamed men for the mess the world was in Harriet Harman, excerpt from her policy; "It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony and cohesion." Harriet also introduced sexist pension policies that were later overturned by the European huma…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:09 PM
7

Fascinating. There are plenty of candidates up for election with no education at all, they aren't the preferred representatives. Ironically, Philip Davies is from a working class family and worked at a supermarket for a number of years before entering politics, so he's really not the best candidate for your gripe. You would be able to tell that by his accent, if you lived here. What exactly is up their "ass"? I suppose your only problem with them is that don't speak like you.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:29 PM
2

Yeah, it has been that way for as long as I can remember. Not many people notice but it makes me chuckle.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:10 AM
17

This is the debate in video form but it may not be available outside of the UK. Brace yourself for a Yorkshire accent.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:15 PM
48

Well, this has already been raised in the house of commons by a few female MPs. This guy completely destroyed their arguments, the debate is here (It's quite a long read but very interesting).
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:54 PM
1

Well that is something to consider.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:58 AM
1

I said "might". I really don't know either way and I have never participated in a campaign to get women to stop dressing provocatively. I never said anything about not doing anything to stop rapists along the lines of your analogy, just that those campaigns don't imply anything about men in general, only rapists. I think there is no contest that being drunk out of your mind and acting like this is going to put you at risk of something, most probably an STD.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:55 AM
9

That site has you listed a few times, this profile was last updated in 1995. I doubt that directory site existed in 1995, but it lists the same address and description. According to Alexa that directory site is 9 years old and builds it's own profiles based on gathered information or has user created profiles. It's possible this is just a case of their algorithm being completely useless for anything other than increasing their global ranking but it is quite the coincidence.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:14 PM
31

That line of thinking presumes YOU are incapable of control No, it presumes that RAPISTS might be incapable of control. I'm not a fucking rapist so it doesn't really bother me how you choose to dress. Dressing like a $2 hooker is more likely to make me get as far away from you as possible.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:24 PM
35

Every single time. Gender stereotypes are bad, except the ones that say women are better.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:12 PM
14

We get the same thing in STEM fields, half of the women are perfectly likeable people, the other half spend all day complaining about how men don't like smart girls and that's why they are single. Never mind the fact that they walk around their male peers (with equal qualifications) boasting about their intelligence all day. I hate to break it to them but women don't like men who are constantly talking about themselves and how great they are either.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:08 PM
1

Yes, that's true, it's easy to label things. Historically, the extreme left have ended up using the suppression of free speech and censorship which even went as far as editing history and taking people out of photographs to fit their agenda. We see that happen from time to time even with moderate leftists in the developed world who would like people with differing opinions to be silenced either through direct censorship or bullying in the form of slander. Of course if you go too far to the right…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:53 PM
1

Same here. That or I get my girlfriend to give me a layered crew cut, for free (OMG exploitation of women).
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:28 PM
5

I agree. Although there probably is some sort of double standard with regards to comments about people's physical appearance. You can say a bald man has a head like a cue ball or comment about how fat he is but if you "diss" a woman it's bullying or even worse "promoting violence against women". There was in this case a political side to it. If you watch the video, the boyfriend of the "bleached hams" called them all racists for being libertarian.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:24 PM
1

I was going to say the same thing. Did you ever watch the US pilot for Red Dwarf?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:46 PM
14

I have boyfriends who have caught me in very compromised situations, and none has ever called me “a disgusting little whore,” which is the kind of thing this woman would scream in a variety of less appetizing ways, on and on. So you mean your boyfriends caught you cheating and they didn't call you out on your behaviour? Fascinating. I couldn't read the entire thing, after reading the description of her apartment and realising the entire article was about her and how hard it is to be her, I just …
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:26 PM
5

Not everyone that goes to college is some kind of expert You should read Anita's dissertation. An interesting video
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:53 PM
5

“So how is a man supposed to know what the boundaries are if the women don’t know?” That question explains everything that is wrong with this rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:09 AM
3

Ah ok, I thought she also produced it. I haven't seen any other movies from that director and to be honest, I don't want to. After reading the descriptions they all sound the same.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:39 PM
2

Oh wow, you are right, that was the Mist. Yeah the fog is something else then. It's been years since I saw that movie.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:52 PM
5

It's from Bindass Dadagiri in India. Basically the contestants have to be insulted and made to loose their cool. This guy was too good for the "bully" and actually made her loose her cool.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:50 PM
6

The Fog The fog? It's a film about a fog that brings creatures out that start killing people. The main theme is politics and how people use religion to control other people. There is no abused man killing people out of revenge. The Descent The descent was about a supernatural creature that lived inside a cave. From Dusk Til Dawn Admittedly there are some anti-heroes in it but they are killing vampire strippers. Edit: Oh ok I didn't understand your post. I thought those were supposed to be films …
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:36 PM
14

Yeah but those guys are the "bad guys" in those movies, the ones you don't sympathise with. This looks like they are the anti-heroes of the film. I don't have a problem with it either way, if I did I would have a problem with films like Rampage which features a violent anti-hero.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:29 PM
2

Well most film critics praised "Baise moi" as an amazing feminist achievement, even though most of the public hated it. It's a French film that basically mirrors this film. It was made by a French porn star (who killed herself after making the film) and featured a "rape scene" with full penetration. Then two girls went around shoving guns up guy's asses and shooting them. It's a terrible movie and I don't recommend it, but most critics loved it for being so "bold". I suspect a similar thing will…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:23 PM
2

wasting the family's finances on alcohol. So if my wife maxed out our credit cards on shoes it's also justified? It wasn't so much to stop him wasting all of the money, more to stop him falling off the wagon. I can understand why in some cases it's unacceptable but how do you reconcile it with this; using her assets without her knowledge or permission Requiring permission to access her assets means that she should also require permission to access mine. Which in turn leads to an allowance, the a…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:24 AM
6

One has to wonder. I know why she keeps getting married. Her second divorce was to another millionaire, it's funny how she just happens to keep falling in love with millionaires.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:12 AM
25

I know some gay MRAs in my area. Most of them came into the movement because of their opposition to feminism and their tactics, some because they were belittled and harassed in the workplace by women but had no recourse to protection from that behaviour. Last time I checked gay men were men so there definitely is a space for them. On top of that their partners are men so they have a double stake in the importance of the rights of men.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:41 AM
5

It just doesn't fit with their other examples of economic oppression; using her assets without her knowledge or permission So as a man I am forced to give any partner of mine free reign over every cent to my name without imposing any limitations but I am not allowed to touch any of her money without having her direct permission? WOW. My dad had some problems with alcoholism and my mother took control over the finances for a few years, she gave him an allowance even though he was the breadwinner.…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 10:35 PM
2

They were heavily criticised for a lego advert by feminist groups and then just before the catalogues release they were sent several letters by 6 year olds (allegedly). The kids apparently wanted a gender neutral catalogue, so they gave them this to stop getting bad press. The funniest part, this isn't gender neutral at all, they just have girls acting like boys and boys acting like girls. It's not gender-typical but it's still massively gender specific advertising.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:24 AM
13

Don't tell any radical feminists. ; ) If you engage with those types online as much as I do you should be able to spot them fairly quickly. I guess you could just ignore them. If it ever does get too much, appeal to the local area for support raising awareness for male DV victims. I'm pretty sure most women and men who aren't ideologues would be on your side if given the facts. I know there is a small men's shelter in London, they don't give the address out unless it's for someone who needs to g…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:39 PM
0

So to get rid of gender stereotypes we just switch the gender stereotypes? How is this any different than what it was before? It's the same shoe, it's just on the other foot. I don't have a problem with more gender neutral toys but Sweden goes way too far. They were talking about forcing hospital staff in maternity wards to never use gendered terms when talking about new born children. Congratulations! It's a bo...errrr thing.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:22 PM
5

Wow, you really must get off on sexualizing young children.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:12 PM
16

has a strong correlation with a decrease in rape/assault. Sex-negative feminists insist otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:29 PM
24

A video named Achmed the terrorist was removed Umm, What? Is that the thing they found racially insensitive? It's a video of a fucking puppet that everyone has seen by now. I hope someone confiscates the dildos of female recruits, after all it's quite offensive knowing they use them in private. You wouldn't want the innocence of those adult women to be at risk. It's like a convent.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:03 PM
4

I didn't know this shit was actually being taught in schools guys, I don't know what to do any more.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:11 AM
12

I just took BCs online social justice course, the same one these kids took. Can you guess what it says in the Gender violence part? Why the focus on Women? Any act of violence is about power and control. (see the “Power and Control” and “Equality” wheels in the URL section following). The focus on Violence against Women in Relationships is due to the epidemic proportions of women experiencing violence in relationships. Any program that reduces and prevents violence against women will make commun…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:08 AM
17

Oh shit, I am having an argument with them on their facebook event page. Their response to everything is; No man, that's what I thought before taking the social justice course You should take the course it will open your eyes Here are stats proving that 80% of strippers are being forced even if they say they like it. Stripping is violence against women Their SJ course is a brainwashing camp, they all have the same rhetoric. It's insane, it's just as bad as tumblr feminists but these guys all got…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:50 AM
5

"It takes more courage to take on something local like this, something people are passionate about" -Social Justice Teacher I don't know why those bimbos are passionate about having a job. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:05 AM
19

So the kids are too young to have even been there before? Let’s get over this stigma. It’s 2013 — it’s time to move on. He actually thinks these people are Victorian era prudes trying to stifle sexuality. No, no, no sir. These students are SJ warriors, it's all the rage in 2013. This is now what is considered sexual liberation: "Do what I say or else" So parents send their kids to state schools so they can be taught what politics to have? I wonder if they also adopt the "privilege checking" part…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:59 AM
0

Cheers guys I will check it out. Google translate isn't too bad for Swedish to English.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:36 PM
9

Well they call it a theatre group so I'm guessing they are art students of some kind. Wasn't the SCUM video also helped along by some nice tax money? Ah ok so after some digging I found the fb of their producer. He is some kind of anti-natalist anarcho-communist feminist guy from Portugal who is living in Sweden (sounds like a student to me). He isn't very smart, after putting his name on that video, his facebook has a map linking to his address. Edit: OK he isn't the only retard, everyone invol…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:05 PM
1

Do you know many Swedish bloggers who are MRAs? Do any of the people threatened have blogs in English?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:54 PM
8

I looked at their website where they claim to be oppressed, the photo they used makes them look like spoiled middle class students who do nothing but drink and smoke all day. What terrible oppression, living off the taxpayer. I don't have a problem with any of that of course, it's just a little tough to swallow that you are somehow victimized when you present yourself in such a manner.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:31 PM
5

Oh the DV part doesn't shock me any more. What is troubling is that someone who is willing to fabricate such ludicrous claims about the men in her life even at the expense of her own child has actually been teaching students things about men and boys for 20 years. I'm willing to bet she had no qualms inventing a narrative that fit her ideology. Like the psychiatrist found; extreme narcissism. Narcissism is something found in unhealthy doses within feminism.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:06 PM
2

No, we don't find it funny. Self defence is a very serious issue. I find it ironic that you are talking about "women getting beaten up" when this is clearly a young man with learning disabilities being attacked and no one else was harmed. Now go show me a video of a girl getting beaten up by a guy for no reason and I will promote self defence on it. It's strange that there aren't many videos of women getting beaten up by guys, considering you think we live in a misogynistic culture and everyone …
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:36 AM
1

np As for the nanny state, well it's actually getting better under the current gov (not too much). We had quite a few years of a left wing government that went a little crazy and are slowly getting rid of their nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:17 AM
3

more and more pro-feminism Just as much as anywhere else. It always has been pro-feminism in the mainstream media. FYI, the news site may be British but Jim Hines (the guy who is complaining about this shit) is American. It's just a news article about him, nothing to do with England.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:10 AM
13

"Erotic fantasy novels are predominately written by women and feature scantily clad men in an attempt to draw the heterosexual female gaze." This really is getting ridiculous. Sci-fi books with those sorts of covers are usually garbage literature on the same level as most erotic novels. Except they don't have nearly as much sex or objectification (of men or women). Let people buy it if they want.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:41 AM
14

Lori Handrahan holds over twenty years of practitioner work, in Central Asia, Asia, Africa and the Balkans, focused on gender-based violence, international human rights, humanitarian response, conflict and post-conflict environments, masculinities and men/boys in development and violence So someone who claims to be an expert on gender-based violence, men/boys and masculinity just happens to be another pathological liar? It seems to me that DV experts (like the ones encountered by Daddy Justice) …
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:40 AM
9

That's assault, in some cases maybe rape. The consent for sexual intercourse was given for protected sex and not unprotected sex. If only it worked both ways...
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:46 AM
5

is prison sentencing something that people really believe there to be a bias in? In the UK it is, at least it is for female MPs. If you look at the debates going on in the house of commons they are pretty sure that women get an unfair deal in the courts. I like it with the genders swapped, people who care about inequalities will be hooked (because women being unfairly treated is great concern to people, otherwise they will just dismiss it as whining). I think it's needed because of the length.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:41 AM
3

Simone Webb describes herself on twitter as; "Member of the misandry Taliban."
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:33 AM
1

Done. Continue.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:25 AM
1

Against their will? The only negative effects of not signing would have been no access to the inheritance during the marriage (for the husband as well). So threatening to not give someone a large sum of money is forcing them against their will?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:37 AM
0

both parents want the other parent to be a parent I never said that. neither parent is prevented from being a parent I never said that either. I know it's pretty banal, you are the one who objected to it. I said in my first post "if possible" and you went on a rant about "If possible they should be middle class". Still, stats point to having a father as being a real benefit to a child. I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:26 PM
2

I just quoted you. You will have to give another reason why something is bad other than "it's not natural" because I have clearly presented several instances where something can be "unnatural" and also objectively good.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:17 PM
1

Your father was unwilling, so she didn't have to deny him anything (I added that qualifier in every single post) the only way to raise the child as a single parent would be to deny access to one of the parents I also added unless the parent was unwilling. If you give up your zygote then you are unwilling to raise that child should it ever be conceived. I said it in every post from the start; "if possible". If one of the parents is unwilling then it's not possible to involve them.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:14 PM
2

That's not a very good quote of yours. then that personality type isn't natural Is still the only reason you give for it being bad, which also applies to every other thing I have said.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:10 PM
3

Again you assume I said everything taught is bad, despite me just having made doubly clear to you that wasn't the case. Actually you made it doubly clear it was the case: That's indoctrination. That's bad.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:05 PM
3

that would mean it wasn't a natural state That's a bad thing. Those are your words, not mine. You didn't state any other reason why it was a bad thing, so it's safe to assume that its your only reason for classifying it as bad. Not stealing is a cultural norm. Stop pulling childish accusations out of your arse I'm not, I'm trying to point out your flawed reasoning here. All you have to do is tell me why something we are not born with is bad. I don't think it's necessarily good either, I just don…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:50 PM
2

if the other parent has no interest in parenting. Then it isn't a life choice. Like I said from the start, "If possible". If the other parent wants no part in raising the child you didn't choose to raise it as a single parent, did you? Of course sperm banks and surrogate mothers exist Last time I checked, sperm banks and surrogate mothers still use both zygotes to conceive. "Unless they were dead or unwilling", that covers the sperm bank and surrogates.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:46 PM
3

What is bad about teaching people not to steal? Or teaching them not rape? Or teaching them not to harm others? I can tell you humans didn't evolve with these notions. that would mean it wasn't a natural state, but rather a cultural gender role we subconsciously teach our boys. That's a bad thing. Civilisation is not a natural state. Ergo teaching civility is bad. I never, ever said anything even remotely near that No, you said if it isn't innate, then it must be bad for them. You didn't explain…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:40 PM
2

http://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/ Of course I think my opinion is the right one I know, I was just pointing out that it was quite a post-modern position to hold. Stop slanting the premises. What are you arguing for? It seems to me like you think being a single parent is a perfectly valid life choice Neglecting of course that conception of a child requires male and female zygote and the only way to raise the child as a single parent would be to deny access to one of the par…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:29 PM
3

That's a bad thing. [citation needed] No, I don't fail to realise that. Well you only mentioned masculinity. I do, however, still fail to realise why they need it. Me too. I just know that it means on average they will be better off, less inclined to substance abuse, criminality, abusive behaviour and more adept at social interaction. As to the reasons? Well I can only guess, I'm not the type to make bold statements like "everything that needs to be taught is bad".
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:19 PM
2

Ok, your opinion is the right one. Nobody is perfect, so nothing matters. It's pretty post-modern. Nobody is perfect but fatherless children are at the bottom of all social indicators of success. It's pretty hard to argue that it doesn't have any effect. Your other billions of possibilities don't have such a strong trend. It's not just an "if possible" Yes it is, if it's not possible (the father is dead, or abusive) then it's not possible. If he is alive and willing to be a father to the child, …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:12 PM
2

Masculinity doesn't need to be taught Probably doesn't, and even if it did, that wouldn't make it a bad thing. You failed to realise that I wasn't only talking about sons but also daughters. I was referring to the conflict between the sexes, or should I say the relationship being an archetype for the child and how they relate to others. Is it necessary? No, you are probably right. Does it help? Well, I guess you don't think it does.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:57 PM
2

I just honestly don't see the problem with missing a father So you don't see a problem with missing a mother and a father then? After all there is nothing a father or a mother can give them that a state appointed carer couldn't? Well, besides oxytocin. if we're going to see a problem with any little thing that may have a tiny adverse effect on the upbringing of the children, no one is fit to be a parent. Nobody is saying single parents shouldn't be allowed to be parents. We are saying that it sh…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:43 PM
4

Ah, the old "Single parent is better than a dysfunctional couple" argument. Problem is, you should probably compare dysfunctional single parents to dysfunctional couples. Nobody is saying it is going to harm the child but most stats point to a fatherless child being less advantaged in our society (on average). You could go further, an orphan is capable of growing up to be a well rounded individual, of course they are but do you know how they would have developed had their circumstances been bett…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:21 PM
3

Exactly. In this case the brother would have taken over the company and received the inheritance money if the husband and wife refused to sign the agreement. He didn't owe any of that money to anyone, especially not his son's wife (or ex-wife).
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:06 PM
2

Except a trust would have made him more of a control freak and would have limited the way his bloodline controlled the company. He didn't really fuck himself at all, the judge fucked his son. So how could the old man have written the contract so as to avoid the duress in your opinion? A contract that says you get everything if you sign and everything if you don't? You still haven't supported your claim that it was her children threatened, which was my problem with your post. My dad didn't give m…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:29 AM
8

Doxxing is revealing the real life identity of an anonymous internet personality (usually with their address). These people were not on the internet. Seems most journalists are guilty of doxxing then, we usually just call it reporting.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:37 AM
4

Threatened her children? No, he threatened HIS children.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:15 AM
3

threat to disown the child You are aware the "child" is the woman's husband? So 16 years into the marriage (before he inherited the company) she had the choice to get no money (as well as her husband) or $7M if she decided to end the marriage. Last time I checked, inheritance issues are the decision of the person dishing it out and they can do so at their own discretion. None of that money was hers or his at this point and they were not being denied their own money, they were simply being offere…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:10 AM
31

Did you see the part where the bank threatened to repossess the house if they didn't sign up for a refinancing plan? So what? As far as I can tell, she wasn't his child. If the agreement was so unfair she could have left then and there or the couple could have sailed off into the sunset to live a simpler life.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:40 PM
40

"They offered me $1M for my company and said if I didn't sell to them now they weren't interested in purchasing it. Now that company is worth $40M and I couldn't have foreseen it increasing in value. We should tear up the agreement and return it to me because I signed under financial pressure."
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:36 PM
24

Yeah, how is she going to afford all of those clothes, pilates, yoga and private clubs with only $7 million, a house and two cottages. FYI the youngest child is 19, the judge even agreed that there was no need for child support. Now, instead of sharing that half a billion with his kids or reinvesting in the family business he is going have to pay for her $13,000 a month wardrobe. Edit: I should add, the money he has and the assets were not accumulated solely over the period of their marriage. In…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:33 PM
0

Ok, maybe there is a misunderstanding here. I never meant take the claims of feminism on good faith, good lord. I just meant that if they want a discussion, let's have at it. Even if they don't want an honest dialogue, it's just more ammunition for us.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:40 AM
0

That may be the case for a large number of them (I do know a few personally that have done a full 180 and are now sympathetic to the MRM). Even if they don't listen what harm could come of it? If anything those curious people on the fence will come here looking for evidence (maybe the feminist propaganda told them it was a hate group) and all they will see is a group of feminists repeating themselves and getting angry (resorting to ad homs and other fallacies) while we present a wall of refutati…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:29 AM
-5

It's nothing to do with tone. I say - let them come here and discuss it with us. I say we let everyone see how hypocritical they are. It seems to me like the OP is suggesting ignoring feminists because they don't practice what they preach. If we take them on good faith and systematically destroy everything they present to us we won't have to keep up this childish bickering. Yeah, I'm going to say healthy criticism shows we don't just swallow whatever is put on our plate. Of course, criticise wha…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:01 AM
10

Lets take a trip back in time 100 years, what other reason would there be for women not being allowed to vote? I don't know, In my country most men couldn't vote 100 years ago. They only gave it to all men after WW1.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:51 AM
1

Don't worry, I didn't eat it. But like I said, keeping up appearances is important. I know they are very unlikely to "woman-up" and stand by their convictions but if we act like the adults here then we are far more likely to win public support. We do have a public image problem in the mainstream media and our biggest strength is that everything said about us is untrue, as evidenced by the discussions here. If we let feminists come here and make fools of themselves then we have won a moral victor…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:44 AM
4

Just because something was stated by a feminist doesn't mean it is wrong. It's a fairly good indicator. It's not an ad hom. It's not because they are feminists but because it comes from /r/feminism, a place which doesn't support anything the picture claims to.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:50 AM
-9

You're that easily offended? You know it reflects well on us to respond positively to such claims and give them the benefit of the doubt. Even if they don't want to talk about it or won't accept anything we say, creating a tolerant environment means we have already won a moral victory. You don't have to like them or what they say, but it helps to maintain an air of civility if we wish to break through to a wider audience. We don't need to convince a bunch of angry feminists on the internet, just…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:46 AM
5

this is the place where they consider just straight-up letting all women out of prison, just for kicks. One feminist politician suggested it and everyone laughed, really not a big deal. An American politician suggested a policy of not chasing criminals to avoid lawsuits and injuries, almost the same thing really. Lad's mags are just soft core porn, playboy is a lads mag. They are for working class "lads", I haven't heard any pro-rape jokes coming from them, but then again I don't read them. I'm …
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:14 PM
10

ignores that there are f to m transsexuals. She doesn't care about them because they aren't trying to steal her victim status. Suzanne Moore and Burchill write anti-male articles at least once a week, nobody ever gives a shit. Unfortunately for her, if you start attacking women who used to be men, people get a little touchy. If it wasn't actually so hateful I would find this drama funny.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:00 PM
2

Chocolate? That's some funny shit right there. Why are women never depressed? What do you expect from such simple creatures? You get to change your name if you want. You will probably never go bald You will never have erectile dysfunction You always get to see your kids You have a pretty good chance of getting alimony for life (just be smart, don't re-marry and your dunce of an ex-husband will be forced to pay you for nothing!) There is no possible scenario in which you will be forced to pay you…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 11:00 AM
4

Don't forget all of the mirrors in those dance studios. Making floor to ceiling glass panels takes a lot of energy (usually from fossil fuels).
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:29 PM
3

I'm not so sure. It might be a good idea but I just come here for links to recent ongoings and discussion, I think a splinter group would just be more of the same but with less info and people. I know a group of MRAs in the UK that I speak to and have met up with a few times. I would recommend finding people in your country or area and try to meet up with them and find your own ways of doing local activism/debates. I would just post European MRM news here, everybody loves to see what's happening…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:35 PM
3

I suppose das Speigel English website doesn't have the same content as the German edition. There is google translate, but that never turns out very well. I would suggest simply posting a summary of the article and how it pertains to the MRM along with a link to the article in google translate. I wouldn't recommend translating the whole article yourself, I don't think it's worth the effort.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:27 PM
2

would not have as many offspring Well there is that but the most important fact is that during the early development of our species it has been estimated that fewer than 25% of the men alive were able to pass on their genetic information (the best of the best) and all of the weaker males simply died without any offspring at all. When compared to the genetic studies that point to the fact that 70% of all women alive during the same period were able to pass their genes on it gets interesting. So, …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:19 PM
1

Well that may be the case for the most successful. I was talking about the ability to control their urges. A guy who assaults someone in a bar with a weapon probably doesn't have very good self control.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:17 AM
9

That little line of thinking presumes that you are incapable of control No it doesn't, because I'm not a bloody rapist. I'm no expert but I'm pretty sure most violent criminals have a problem with self-control.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:15 AM
1

And darker skinned people are more prone to bone cancer if they live in Northern Europe with very little sunshine.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:44 PM
5

Wow. The talk page is a mess Telling someone to shut up and check their privilege isn't derailing an argument because privilege is real. How rational. There seems to have been a lot of interest in the page after your edits and every edit of the page seems to be dismissed as misogyny.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:26 AM
10

They invited her in for a drink and played drinking games before she performed oral sex on three of the men pregnant woman drinks and gives oral sex to strangers Well, sounds like a catch to me.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:44 PM
14

The pot gender gap Wow, they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for their oppression. Maybe the MRM should be more concerned with the knitting gender gap. women tend to be closet smokers I'm pretty sure most people are closeted smokers in places where you can be arrested or fined. I was just under the impression most people stopped smoking after they grew up.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:48 PM
2

Doxxing is when you take the alias of someone you know only online and release personal information about their real life to the online community. As far as I can tell the feminists who protested the WF lecture were not online or operating under any alias, so it's hardly doxxing. It's called reporting on a story. If I went to the NOW conference and stripped naked and fought with the police you would bet that my name would be in the news.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:24 PM
1

Pravda (truth) is pretty bad at reporting in general, they like to whip their readers into a frenzy rather than be factual. I would take what they publish with a gain of salt.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:57 PM
10

They can't name them for legal reasons. Two women - one aged 20 from Doncaster and the other 24 from Bedford - were brought to the Welsh capital where they were also arrested. The two women, who cannot be named for legal reasons, also appeared in court. The younger faces four charges and the older, six. Also the main offence they are being charged with is conspiracy to commit child abuse. Frontman Ian Watkins, 35, was remanded in custody charged with child sex offences - including conspiring wit…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:58 PM
4

Of course they do sweetheart.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:10 AM
1

:D
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:03 AM
5

lol As someone mentioned in the comment section, they have only ever managed to last a year or so after building wooden shacks and crapping in the woods. Alas they had to return to the oppressive male world to get "money" (eurgh it's almost as bad as rape) and make sure they file their tax returns so they get their full pension to be paid for by the male pigs and women who worked their whole lives. Of course the failure of the experiments is put down to "patriarchy", and the fact that mainstream…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:21 PM
8

Sounds lovely. You know, I really don't mind if a bunch of lesbians want to build communities comprised of only people who agree with them politically and share the same sexuality while sustaining themselves. Problem is that I know a few people who think the same and would like to live in a community full of centre-right, heterosexuals but those guys are propped up as bigots and pathologically ill. Progress sure is strange.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:28 PM
2

Jokes on her, it was a gathering of Lesbian separatist feminists, Dr Julia Long just has bad eyesight and can't tell the butch Lesbians in overcoats from men. Eh, what do you expect from a self proclaimed lesbian separatist who organises radical fem conferences? They are lucky she didn't put them in a room and try out her supply of sarin gas on them. Their whole premise is that the world would be great if it were just a bunch of lesbians swanning around.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:51 PM
2

Not to mention the video released on liveleak of a 10 year old boy being forced to decapitate unarmed ligated men by the FSA. Not only is the article biased towards women but also towards the FSA it seems, they are both rotten to the core and equally guilty of war crimes (not that any western media will cover anything other than Assad's crimes). I can almost see her point though, on the face of it it is easier to distinguish "civilian massacres" by looking at the number of women killed but to sa…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:52 AM
33

As someone who has worked in a cocktail bar for a few years and had my genitals and/or arse grabbed full force on several occasions by drunk women, I can honestly say that cat calling really has nothing to do with sexual assault any more than blowing a kiss has to do with sexual assault. You are having this discussion because you are under the impression that whistling is akin to rape. I really don't care if you want to call it rape, I will just take the issue of rape less seriously if that is t…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:57 AM
25

Don't teach me where to find the nearest fire exit, teach fires not to BURN!
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:56 PM
6

Well a Russian reporter tried to infiltrate their group and discovered that members of Femen must strip for the audition and have nice enough bodies, they also receive a hefty salary that would make most Ukrainian women jealous.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:56 PM
9

No, that's just because we are all ugly.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:24 AM
7

Not on Newsnight. It's a late night in-depth domestic news analysis panel. It will never air on the BBC more than once and I doubt any other news channel would want it. They sell dramas, comedy, documentaries and entertainment like top gear.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:21 AM
5

I watched the programme when it aired and thought she was a little pointless to have on the show. They said she was a young business woman, they failed to mention it was just a fashion blog. It's not fair because I can't avoid tax like the big corporations We can't boycott anything because I like to have my lunch break in starbucks and use their wi-fi. That was all she really said.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:17 AM
59

Well you wouldn't make the class photo look like it was diverse enough. Diversity, it's our strength and you can tell some people have it by looking at the colour of their skin.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:09 PM
49

Yes, that is the belief held by lesbian radfems.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:54 AM
14

He said "I hope you get laid".
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:35 PM
6

She is Welsh. Yes, Welsh accents have odd intonations but so does the Welsh language.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:02 AM
11

Is she aware that birthrates in most western countries are actually below the 2.1 per couple rate of resupply? Most governments aren't looking to lower birthrates at all. Sure, reducing unwanted pregnancies is important but that's a tad extreme.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:35 AM
2

Damn, I didn't think anyone would sift this low into the muck and see how ridiculous this whole argument got. Yeah I am, I live down south now.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:13 PM
174

Dispatch: "Be advised, he's got privilege."
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:10 PM
17

Maybe you should edit the image to remove his name and DOB.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:08 PM
3

It was twice Looking over your posts in this thread it was more like 10 times. is inferior to you. *Is inferior to yours.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:05 PM
3

Well it wasn't just one instance. If you want to feel better, how about we just say it was typo? It was an accidental keystroke that just happened to form a word that sounds almost identical to the one intended.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:54 PM
15

How about tits/vulva and dicks? NSFW
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:46 PM
2

Of course, but you can spell them both. You just have the inability to tell in which context they are used.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:37 PM
4

Nope.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:29 PM
3

Your You're* Just highlighting the fact that some trying to tell me I don't understand language cannot differentiate between "wear" and "were", "their" and "there" or "your" and "you're". It's not really spelling, they are two entirely different words.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:02 PM
5

right to were what they want were It's wear. I think I am done trying to explain how language can influence your argument. I was talking about this; Exposing himself at the anti rape rally was a horrendous thing to do infront of women and children supporting an anti rape walk. how bad it is that he insulted there anti rape cause Explain how then? This should help The whole purpose of it is that it doesn't apply to anything outside of the quantum world. It's used to highlight the absurdity of the…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:24 PM
5

...I don't think you understood the experiment and/or what I was saying... What you were saying is that it is valid, it isn't. Misrepresentation would suggest I was calling it something it was Ok so if I call a rape, "sexual intercourse" among other things that isn't a misrepresentation? It is. You are calling it something that makes your argument stronger. You specifically called it an "anti-rape parade" in every single post. People think slut walks is a puerile movement, including all of my fe…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:05 PM
10

Slut walk among other things is anti rape. No doubt it is, I'm anti-rape, most people are in fact. Calling it an anti-rape parade instead of slut walk is a misrepresentation. But you see the thing is it is valid As a physics student, I can say it isn't. Anyone who thinks it is has failed to grasp the purpose of the initial thought experiment.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:53 PM
7

glorifying him Can you read? He isn't a rapist and he didn't rape anyone. Jesus, you feminists go rape crazy at the mention of the word. you think slut walk isn't about rape Again, reading comp? I said it wasn't an anti-rape parade. It was about exposing as much skin as you want and not being blamed for any unwanted attention you got. Fair enough cause really, but this guy exposed some skin and got lynched. So really it goes against the ideals of the slut walk. Oh grow up. No seriously, I don't …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:36 PM
7

Listen, go back to posting on feminist subreddits. Are you kidding me? The point of slut walk is because some senator said women dressing slutty deserved to get raped. It is an anti rape parade. No it wasn't. It was after a Policeman in Canada said that there was a rapist on the loose and they should avoid dressing like sluts. Are you kidding me? It's not an anti rape parade, it's a slut walk, stop misrepresenting it by changing the language. They would have called it an anti rape parade if that…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:20 PM
7

anti rape cause It's a slut walk, it's not about being anti-rape (what the fuck, who is pro rape?), it's about being able to wear what you want without being told that your actions may contribute to the outcomes. "Don't dress like a slut when you are alone at 4 am, something might happen" "Don't take your dick out when you are alone in a crowd of lunatics, something might happen" I just find it hilarious that half of the people at slut walk are exposing themselves (the one in London had plenty o…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:10 PM
4

Jessica Valenti on rape Pass.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:45 PM
21

Wow. I just typed "Sociology Masculinity" into google and the first blog result was this; When in a men’s sports locker room you must tread lightly on the topic of sexuality. Due to the nudity and closeness in the locker room space, “doing gender” and showing masculinity correctly is highly important to make sure the athletes are putting off the proper vibe. This macho environment promotes sexist, racist, and homophobic attitudes that are leading to the promotion of a rape culture.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:45 PM
3

Certainly, though it does fit the narrative most politically inclined MRAs have. What's really shocking is that this isn't just a case of single mothers vs gun toting SHTF scaremongers, the women and the men involved have PhDs in economics.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:28 PM
8

Slutwalk said that's bad, mmkay.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:37 PM
21

There was recently outrage here in the UK when a Police website had "know your limits, being heavily intoxicated can impair your judgement and increase your chances of sexual assault" so they had to remove it. It's in the same vein really. I have woken up next to girl a few times after a night out with little recollection of how we ended up in bed. Did I unknowingly commit date rape? or did they? Besides, isn't "date rape" when you intentionally drug or intoxicate someone with express purpose of…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:34 PM
5

I've read about 3 recent articles from different sources that basically espouse the same viewpoint, I mean identical reasoning. It's like progressive journalists are a hive-mind, that or they lack creativity.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:11 PM
2

Yes. The snark is the Best part.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 02:11 PM
1

Europe - Low (France, Spain, Italy..) Is even funnier. The three countries with the highest number of annual tourists are the least privileged Europeans. Having lived in France and the UK, they are on the same privilege level (higher privilege for the UK because English speaking privilege lol) and the Netherlands is not top tier. It's such a troll.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:15 PM
19

Ding, ding ,ding.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:25 PM
36

Exactly. Reminds me of the phrase "jack of all trades, master of none". I don't even know what constitutes being good at multitasking, I don't have anything to compare it to. Checking your horoscope while eating pro-biotic yoghurt?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:54 PM
77

Who came up with this multitasking boast? Every woman I have ever met tells me she is better at multitasking than me but I have yet to see them multitask at all. Where do they come up with this? My mum can hardly talk and drive at the same time and she boasts about her feminine multitasking abilities to me all the time.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:37 PM
15

I hate Jezebel.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:44 AM
4

Well just like DSK his millions will have to be put to good use defending himself now. Maybe this woman won't make the mistake of gloating to her friends about how she "bagged a rich one".
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:27 PM
2

I like them that length. Short videos are great but the kind of back and forth gets hard to follow if you just stumble upon one of the videos in a series of debates (like justicars). If I don't have time to finish one in a sitting, I just watch the rest later ( I turned one into Mp3 and listened to it on my way to Uni). The videos that are a "wall of text" are the most watched videos in the MRM so there is an attraction to them. They are well thought out and are pretty frank, it's better than mo…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:51 AM
6

I am pretty sure sex in public areas isn't legal That's what makes it so good.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:59 PM
1

They stick out like dog's bollocks.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:56 PM
4

Don't forget those highly successful and morally justified "Pray the Gay away" projects.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:47 AM
3

Well the FEPS is working on fixing that. FEPS supports research that is informed by a female perspective Maryanne Fisher is responsible for it. I have no problem with a feminine perspective on evo psych but using the word feminist in relation to a scientific discipline is not on.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:01 AM
3

Well they aren't housewives if they are out working. I'm not saying it's not an issue but I don't see how this relates to husbands paying their wives.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:44 PM
2

Well it does bother me that when I want to buy something casual in a store there are usually 3 floors for women and a corner of the basement for men, so it's hard to get what you want. For casual wear I go for a plain white t-shirt, fitted denim and chelsea boots. It's like a uniform for me now. Otherwise I like my clothes to be functional, neat and conservative. Chambray shirts, tailored charcoal tweed suits and barbour waxed cotton jackets. I guess I like to look semi professional. As for wome…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 11:27 AM
7

Some men had it good, notably those in the aristocracy. It's also handy to point out that women who were members of the aristocracy had even better lives than the men. Most men and women have had pretty shitty lives (compared to the ones we live today) throughout human history.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:06 AM
4

Onewhohenpecksgiants henpecks Yeah, it's a troll.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:48 PM
1

Aren't we talking about guys who are nice in order to "impress" a girl? What exactly, is a player, except someone who masks imperfections the he isn't confident enough to wear proudly? The make-up jibe is a joke, my point is that nobody acts "how they truly are". Most girls I have dated were considerably nicer when we first met than they were just before breaking up. How do you even define "how you truly are"? Make-up isn't about hiding blemishes, if it was a skin colour foundation I could accep…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:33 PM
4

I guess she could have killed herself...that would make a small difference. /s
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:00 PM
2

people should be nice to each other regardless That sounds wonderful. However men and women are not sentient altruists who live to serve others. Most women who are nice do so in order to obtain something (fix their computer for example). If you look at most charity workers, who are probably the most altruistic among us they usually expect recognition for their "noble" deeds and adopt a holier than thou attitude. Yes of course people should be nice to each other but I think you are overstating th…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:42 PM
11

People modify their behaviour to increase the pool of potential partners to choose from. Most human interaction is based off of self interest, if you dig deep enough. What was it Machiavelli said? "In the actions of all men, and especially those of Princes... one looks at the result." - Niccoló Machiavelli, The Prince. 1537. I don't see how their ulterior motive of attracting a mate should detract from them being nice. Coming up next we attempt to explain why women who wear make-up are jerks bec…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:28 PM
4

Well the difference is that these people joined the Atheist/Sceptic community. They then started to influence the conventions, to a point where at least 40% of all debates revolved around sexism and misogyny. Richard Dawkins brushed them off and they labelled him a misogynist and a white supremacist. After a year of fighting between everyone it's finally hitting the fan and they are being debunked by most atheists as psychopaths and religious zealots. They formed this splinter group to promote f…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:30 AM
9

I got my popcorn when they first started this shit. The end times are upon us. They have inadvertently pushed quite a few atheists into the MRM. Just a quick look at their main forum is like peering into an insane asylum.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:19 AM
30

enmeshed in the community It's also worth noting that it was his parents' farm and he probably grew up there. I don't know how you can be more enmeshed in the community than that.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:32 AM
3

Well look at the author's twitter right here. Fangirl, Social Justice League member, queer, crazy. Destroying America since 1991. Zie pronouns, please. Zie is very young (and naive) and has already tweeted about the deleted comment. but feminist propaganda isn't a bad thing
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:20 PM
1

She contradicts herself throughout the article. Nice try, you fucking idiot. Don't you have some misogyny to go cry about?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:19 PM
1

I have a discount on the ferry since I did some translation work for the Steam Packet company. How far away do you live? It is quite isolated here.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:35 PM
2

I am in the UK, well not officially. Living on the Isle of Man for the time being but could get to Leicester or anywhere else fairly easily. I feel ok about it :)
/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:58 AM
1

WE NEED MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT AND TO MAKE THOSE DEADBEAT DADS PAY!
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:48 AM
53

The worst part is she openly states that she will only date white guys for no reason other than their physical appearance, then goes on to criticise white guys who are attracted to Asian women for the same reason.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:01 PM
1

Those comments, holy fuck. White men DONT GET IT either. Most white men are the most patriarchal and misogynistic I guess I don't get it either. Where do they find these people who throw the word "white supremacist" around like it's some pervasive all encompassing thing? I have come to live with the word patriarchy being thrown around but this is a whole new level of stupid. I can't wait for her next article; "My room is untidy because of patriarchal white supremacists"
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:55 PM
9

Then you would need a government rep present during the intercourse to ensure the contract was upheld without any deviation from the terms. They could call them "Sex positive arbiters". Can't get an erection? Get sued for breaking the contract.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:45 PM
12

To get a conviction you would have to declare that you didn't want to buy something for the woman...that's a hate crime. Mandatory sensitivity training would be required to teach you all of women's ways of knowing and how refusing something can damage her emotionally. Get on your knees already and beg forgiveness from the goddess. You should be grateful she even blessed you with her words, let alone the opportunity to buy her something.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:39 PM
3

I can't wait until they take it to it's logical conclusion; mandatory contract of consent prior to all sexual encounters. I think that once they get that in Sweden the rape stats will drop down to almost nothing. The reason there are so many "rapes" in Sweden is that rape means anything they want it to. One commenter pointed out that most rapes in Sweden are not committed by strangers but by people you trust, because sometimes when asked for sex you are so paralysed by fear that you can't say no…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:33 PM
-1

Ok, well here is the conference where she makes all of these claims (well not just her). The video is about 1h30 but I linked to the relevant part, the circumcision part is here and here. There is more peppered around the video but it was the most mind numbingly tedious and anti-intellectual gathering I have ever witnessed and I don't recommend watching it.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:19 AM
1

Well she thinks that anyone who argues that circumcision is mutilation or a "big deal" is a white supremacist. Oh and Richard Dawkins is white supremacist too. Based on...the fact that most atheist conventions have too many white men. Not very bright at all.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:17 AM
1

I'm pretty sure he has almost 100% of the AA vote from latest polls and he has the women's vote because he will give them birth control served at McDonalds with every purchase and abortion coupons for every 10 meals purchased at Wendy's. HOPE lol
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:41 AM
30

Sweet. So I'm a heterosexual cisgendered cisethnic cisspecies transdexterous (s) homochromatic bilingual bipedal homme male. I need to get those business cards printed out.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:24 AM
4

As always, the comments section is where the most insightful opinions appear; This is the thing. Women are told from birth, in their families, in education, the media and all other major social institutions that their duty is to treat men like dirt. If they are rude, mean and greedy they are 'strong', 'fiesty', 'independent' etc. rather than, well, rude, mean, greedy. If I wanted to be bullied, demeaned and treated like a turd I would get myself a girlfriend. But I don't. So I won't. Face like a…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:41 AM
7

I don't know. There really isn't much you can do or say that wouldn't cause a lot of trouble. I know that my mother got extremely defensive and angry (practically shouting) when I brought up an MR issue with her. It was just a casual conversation and she isn't some kind of uber feminist either but she took it as a personal attack on her and women. She wouldn't let me explain and finally said something long the lines of "you will end up old and lonely". From that point I just don't bring up these…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:13 PM
3

Barely mentioned outside of a footnote on some local paper. To be fair I think her friends convinced her she was raped (I only knew the guy). You get a call from one of your girlfriends at 4am and she is balling her eyes out and quite drunk, what other reason could it be?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:10 PM
3

It's a reference to the film Anchorman, Ron Meyer = Ron Burgandy. "It's anchor-MAN, not anchor-LADY, and that's a scientific fact."
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:33 PM
4

Having been through college, I can honestly say that within our department (Science and Eng) nobody ever had sex without alcohol being involved. Both the guys and the girls were so timid that they wouldn't dare proposition anyone without a heavy dose of dutch courage. I can understand if she was passed out or so drunk she couldn't stand but that's not how drunken sex usually works. In my experience the girls were the ones doing the propositioning once they got a little drunk and if you interrupt…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:39 PM
3

The content of this site is parody. No composition should be regarded as truthful, and no reference of an individual, company, or military unit seeks to inflict malice or emotional harm. All characters, groups, and military units appearing in these works are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, or actual military units and companies is purely coincidental.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:24 PM
9

That site.... is satire. All of the articles are jokes. "camouflage ceiling" lol The only real thing about it are the comments made from women outside of the military bigging themselves up.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:21 PM
3

If we didn't eat the fruit that women shoved in our faces, we might still be in the fucking Garden of Eden. So yeah, we're a little bitter when it comes to eating that stuff. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Besides which, I thought that women liked the dark greens like Broccoli and Spinach because we're perpetually suffering from iron deficiencies on account of we bleed once a month and never die. The comments are killing me.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:17 PM
2

Ah yes, she is wonderful. I remember when Featherstone of the Lib Dems made a speech condemning men for the financial crisis and that more women like her should be elected to fix the problem (no mention how she was going to do so). I made a comment on the news article that rustled some feathers; "Look at the problems in society today, surely women are not fit to raise children. It is undeniably their fault that these evil people pulling the puppet strings are even raised. Of course these problem…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:04 PM
8

I didn't say it was the same. I really don't care to argue over who is allowed to say what. I said that in reference to; I've heard way, way, waaaay more negativity about beef curtains than I have about small penises in my life, both joking and serious Which is bullshit. I didn't even know it was possible to have "beef curtains" until I met a girl with them. Maybe they are just more prevalent in your part of the world.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:26 PM
11

I was circumcised but live in a country where circumcision is not the norm. I have never heard complaints about any sort of hygiene epidemic resulting from the prevalence of foreskinned individuals here. My brother has his and has never had a problem. I have stretched scrotal tissue covering the base of my penis which makes it painful to have intercourse at times, the doctors have no way of knowing how the penis will grow and cannot ensure sufficient skin will be left should they develop an abno…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:16 PM
11

"Women who drive around in large, expensive cars are compensating for their oversized labia" I hear that joke all the time.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:00 PM
19

That's the response I usually get when talking to women about it. Talk about inappropriate sexual objectification of an infant. Why should the genitalia of a baby come into their minds when they think about what is attractive or not? Because one day they will grow up and have to please a woman? Are male infants simply sexual objects? I wonder what my gf would say if I suggested that we have the labia of our future daughter partially removed because some guy is really going to love eating her out…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:20 PM
10

Check your privilege
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:51 AM
2

It already has been entirely co-opted, from what I hear. I first heard about it a year ago on a feminist blog and they already had them in their sights. They were worried that the men might lose focus of women's issues.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:31 AM
17

She is still a respected "academic" who publishes a paper like that once a year. Her training includes a few gender studies classes and a misunderstood reading of a physics textbook. No academic seems to scrutinize this stuff, she has been teaching this nonsense for 15 years at 2 separate universities. When you think about it, a set of laws that were created to explain the inexplicable cater perfectly to feminism.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:09 PM
20

Oh wow. You and I think alike. I love it when people use quantum mechanics to explain macroscopic events. Here, read this paper if you have time on your hands; http://web.archive.org/web/20100709025004/http://www.mcluhan.utoronto.ca/academy/carolynguertin/diss.html
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:43 PM
5

More like all events in time have already occurred and are only distorted into a linear sequence of events by our perception of them. It takes determinism to a whole new level. Schrödinger's victim Oh, well that would imply that they are both a victim and not a victim at the same time. Scrap that.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:39 PM
66

This. Never mind that those people who shout "victim blame" obviously have a non-linear interpretation of time. They aren't victims yet.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:06 PM
3

Will you please stop talking about getting ejaculate all over your face? It's really disturbing. Some people and their fantasies, jesus. Keep your sordid imagination to yourself!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:50 PM
3

There is nothing ad hom in my comments. If you don't have a nice personality it's pretty obvious that people aren't going to value it. Maybe you don't feel like they value anything else because you don't have anything else to value. It seems to me like that's something that never occurred to you. I never said you were imagining any of it, well maybe you are adding little embellishment for dramatic effect. You are imagining what they are thinking. They are doing it because they don't care that th…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:35 PM
17

The best part of the article are the responses to it. "Mainsplaining d00d should have just left the laundromat, he isn't oppressed. He chose to terrorize her." Blahblahblahblah Then the guy calls himself a monster and apologises and they all cheer and say that he has shown his true face. Yay!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:49 PM
11

From source Seven years ago, I was headed out to do my laundry. It was early, before dawn, and the laundromat was across the street. Entering the building, I saw a young woman gasp, before crouching behind a washer with a look of pure terror on her face. My immediate response was to be dumbfounded, and it took the woman only a few seconds to realize that I was there to wash my clothes. She apologized, and went back to watching her laundry. I said nothing to her. Feeling frazzled, I loaded a wash…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:46 PM
2

Actually I never claimed anything like that. I said that an emphasis on one aspect does not detract from another. Then I claimed that it wasn't "objectification" at all. Pretty different to: objectification is merely "emphasis on one's appreciation of your body." But you seem to be using feelings to interpret these things so I can't really blame you.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:37 PM
5

They are probably just ridiculing you for their own amusement. If saying such simple things "takes away your worth" then you probably didn't have much to begin with. Judging from your comments, you don't have a very nice personality, why should they like it? Maybe you should work on your personality instead of flying off the hinges and imagining all the of different things people may or may not think about you. Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:18 PM
3

You have issues, serious issues. For the record typhonblue is pretty well equipped to comment on the matter.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:12 PM
2

Not only is it legal but women also get to promote circumcision using bogus science (Hilary Clinton for AIDS recently) or by "hypersexualising" an infant male; "Oh your parents did you a favour getting it done, I prefer it cut". It's like saying that it doesn't matter that the child didn't agree to have it chopped off because one day he will need to please a woman, which is pretty sick when you think about it. Hilary Clinton is the most hilarious proponent of male circumcision because every othe…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:09 PM
5

Well if you fall for that then I really can't sympathise with you. Someone in Nigeria told we they were a princess and I had to give them my bank account details. They still gave you the opportunity to respond to their lies and decide for yourself as a human being whether or not they were worth your time (I hope you decided they weren't). For the record, maybe I don't get out enough but I don't like casual hook ups at all and some women who approach me in bars scare the shit out of me with their…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:12 PM
9

Yes, well people lying to gain someone's confidence isn't really something new. Read any number of dating books written for women and being honest isn't always advised for women either. I just think this whole "objectification" mantra is a slippery slope if you define it like that. After all, would you have to lie to an object? Do objects need to deceptively coerced into doing things? That's pretty unique to humans actually, well the animal kingdom. I think the "means" in your case would be the …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:03 PM
7

That's impossible on the internet, you will just have to live with the stigma of being a douche.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:39 PM
20

They are doing it because they don't care that they're hurting your feelings, they don't care that they're taking away your worth I think you just made that up. You didn't address the last part, how does an emphasis on one characteristic detract from all others? So when I get a compliment for being "good with computers" that means I'm ugly and can't do anything else? That means I'm "objectified" as a tool to fix computers? Seems pretty ridiculous. EDIT: I should add even if that was their intent…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:16 PM
5

I don't want to come off as a douche but can you explain this; I had been sexually objectified by complete strangers since I went through puberty. Surely if you were "objectified", treated like an object, then people would just pick you up and do what they wanted to you without regard for you as a human being. I'm assuming you mean you have received unwanted attention from some men who may have also been assholes. How does an emphasis on one's appreciation of a certain aspect of a person detract…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:03 PM
3

"Hey look there are posters trying to promote this website we don't like!" "Let's bring more attention to it than a poster ever could." Some of the things these academic feminists do is really rather mind boggling. That is until you read a published thesis on; Quantum Feminist Mnemotechnics and you finally realise that they are all idiots.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:31 PM
1

Most places in Africa have plumbing and separate bathrooms. The instances where they don't are because of poverty (the beach in Liberia is one example, which is also a WHO concern) or because they live in tribal setting (which usually comes with sexual rituals and rights of passage, but I'm pretty sure they hide themselves as best they can when defecating). I'm just saying, it seems to me that this "overhyped" sexuality is a pretty human thing, not exclusive to the west. Besides, I hardly see ho…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:58 PM
6

The west? As opposed to? Where exactly is this utopia where the sexuality of the body isn't overhyped? Where people just excrete their bodily fluids in front of all sexes, all genders, indiscriminately and for all to see? I mean India springs to mind, but most of the people crapping in the Ganges don't actually do it out of choice.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:33 PM
5

He likes his "manhood" status, he clings to meaningless things to convince himself he still has it. In reality he acts like a wimp and bitches and moans all of the time and usually uses his emotions to decide what is right and wrong. Case in point, he feels that it's not a big deal. Pretty standard over compensation, he has to keep up that veneer of "toughness".
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:19 PM
10

They completely brush over what the actual accusations are. Like they said, they watch too much porn. They seem to think that sexual harassment towards men will look like like the ending of "Office sluts gone wild Vol. 35". They should have checked out Janet Napolitano's picture. Besides, being flirted with and/or being distracted by inappropriate attires (cleavage for example) is a big deal considering the shitstorm that would come down on the guys if they ever responded or made comments about …
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:18 PM
39

Oh yeah, actual feminism.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:18 AM
2

Cath Elliot is insane. Her insane feminist mantra is only rivalled by her insane left wing class warfare mantra.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:15 AM
5

It's the same for rape/abuse support hotline here in the UK. They are all run by the same exclusively feminist clergy. There was a recent ad campaign on tv which was for a government organisation trying to help young victims of abuse but all of their adverts implied only women could be victims of rape/abuse. So I went to their site to see what they were all about, the second comment I read on their site message service was from a young guy asking If this was the right place for him to ask questi…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:28 PM
10

I have a read a few comments regarding "rape culture" that implied that young boys raped each other in locker rooms all over the western world to train for raping women when they got strong enough. That this was their initiation into the rape culture and how it permeated. The problem with this theory is that I have never heard of this, people in locker rooms would joke around and sometimes harass people but nobody was ever raped. The stories from my sister and her experiences in the girl's locke…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:21 PM
7

I think the most recent documented case of feeling raped came from a man asking a woman for coffee at 4am in an elevator. Apparently in order for them not to "feel" raped you have to ask for permission to ask for permission for asking for permission. Saying "don't take this the wrong way" will not get you off the hook.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:01 PM
3

Have you read SCUM? I know people like to pretend it is just some nihilistic piece of art but it never was. It's ok to study it, because the insanity is worth noting. At least place it into context, a classroom would be best. You should also mention that after she released this manifesto she shot Andy Warhol, some other guy and tried to execute another. I mean if you want to understand what her motives were that is.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:54 AM
10

Have you watched this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn3cHsHnUPM It was banned from broadcast in Sweden because it made the feminists look bad.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:47 AM
2

Yes, things that are actually intellectual usually bother feminists. In fact anti-intellectualism has always been a tenant of "gender studies". "Rationality, reason and logic are the tools of our oppressors." "To fight the patriarchy we must foster our own thought processes, based around our bodily functions. Namely our cyclical wombs and the call of gaia." Most of their academic books manage to disprove the scientific process and you can't really contest it because well....it's a thought proces…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:41 AM
3

Hey shorty
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:09 PM
0

Every public restroom I have been to has baby changers in the men's or in the disabled lobby. Besides, who the hell needs baby changers at university? MR: Supporting men's right to share a bathroom with more strangers just to change a baby at university. Seems pretty diluted as far as "rights" go.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:37 PM
1

Well either way, they will accuse them of supporting the patriarchy when it suits them and include them when they want more support. They call for the death of both in most cases so it's hard to tell who they hate most. I actually read a comment on a mainstream newspaper by a trans that said that Radfems are turning into the patriarchy because they are supporting the Vatican by hating trans, the vatican being the ultimate bastion of the "patriarchy". You can't make this shit up, Radfems hate tra…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:22 AM
1

TERFs hate MRAs more than trans, that RF part takes care of that.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:46 AM
2

Again, what right of men is being supported here? I didn't say I was angry, tbh you seem more reactionary than me. I'm fine with it. I would rather just use a male washroom and not do my "business" in front of people I am sexually attracted to (neither would most women either). I already have a hard time taking a dump in public when men are in the stall next to me, I can't imagine having women listen in would help that issue.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 06:33 AM
2

Isn't this more of a trans/non-gender conforming/non-gender binary issue? I will take a guess that these washrooms don't have urinals. Feminists are the ones clamouring for gender neutral restrooms so they can abolish the urinal. I don't have a problem with it but I don't see it doing anything other than forcing men to behave a certain a way in the presence of females/trans. I like having one of the few male spaces "legally" allowed to exist. At least they aren't proposing the banning of urinals…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:56 AM
-1

College girl in 2012 with just over 300 "friends" and 3 interests/likes, seems unlikely to be legit. Most girls like that have close to 1000 these days.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:03 AM
14

Not really. But the court system functions on the fallacy that men are to blame and are defacto instigators of adultery; alimony.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:05 PM
-1

So did he post it for the husband? Not that I like vindictive behaviour but she isn't exactly a good wife.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 07:47 PM
2

Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 02:43 AM
3

"All of their hate only proves exactly why we need these videos to be made."
/r/MensRights16/06/12 01:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter