TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AustNerevar Archive

View 7 posts and 887 comments by AustNerevar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-20

This seems like a dangerous mindset to take. We shouldn't be racing to the bottom. We should be acting to end the stigma around accusations.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 03:49 PM
8

After my ex and I broke up I was pretty upset and she was seeing another guy about a week later. She came back to me to fool around and I of course agreed readily. As soon as she grabbed my dick she said something to the effect of "Oh, I forgot how big it is." Rode that high for a long time.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:24 PM
1

Yeah like a decade ago two different women complimented me on my clothes within the same week.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:21 PM
2

The same rules that apply to feminism apply to MRM. Protect your movement. If bad actors claim they are a feminist and a large number of feminists recognize them as such, then they are a feminist and represent the feminist movement. The same shit happens in the MRM. Any attempt at pretending it doesn't is just willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:32 PM
-1

Nah fuck that shit. Don't judge other people or presume to preach about their lives to them. You're not entitled to other peoples lifestyles. Fuck right off with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:51 PM
-1

Mimicking them does not make them stop getting away with it. You could try actually stopping them from doing this shit instead of doing it yourself.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 10:12 PM
-4

An eye for an eye makes everyone blind.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:14 PM
5

I mean, you're not wrong about the subreddit as a whole, but you're sure as hell wrong about this thread.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:16 AM
1

More than a decsnt number, the vast majority of cases will end with neither side being confirmed guilty. Barring video evidence or a direct confession, its really hars to prove that an accusation of sexual assault was justified. Which is why the argument that it will discourage victims from reporting is bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:15 AM
29

Well a draft doesn't exist, but selecrive service does. Still a miscarriage of justice, though an important distinction.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:03 PM
0

Pay attention to context. We are specifically discussing the sex registry. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:25 PM
1

Pensioner, 68, is ordered to sign the sex offender register after grabbing the crotch of a paramedic treating her for a fall and asking: "How big is it?"
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:47 PM
1

in this situation
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:27 PM
7

He wasn't presenting this as any kind of argument against your point. There are room for both discussions. Its good that men and women are being punished equally in this situation, but wouldn't you rather that the registry in its current form didn't exist at all?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:45 PM
2

I was just giving you an example. You claimed there was no way that a false accusation could made without intending harm. I wasn't arguing that it was a valid defense.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:53 PM
3

and... how do you make a false rape accusation without the intent to harm? Through error. "It was dark." "There were a lot of people around. I got confused about who did it." "I was drugged and couldn't see their face."
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:37 PM
1

Guys this is fucking fetish porn. Chill the fuck out.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:45 PM
10

Unless there's a rate of zero wrongful convictions in a justice system, then capital punishment has no place in it.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:17 AM
5

Well I do, but I wasn't exactly given a choice.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:46 AM
1

No...its more like he allowed an unlicensed person to pilot his boat that allegedly wasn't even safe to take out. He's absolutely at fault here. She's at fault too, but the courts tend to be lenient toward dead people.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:14 AM
-10

Dude this place has already been lost. Back in 2014 it was still alright, but it didn't take long after that for it to descend into a cesspool of circlejerking, propaganda, and hatred. It did become the very thing it sought to fight. And it got worse, because the rational of us left the sub. I honestly am only still subscribed for the occasional decent post, but there's no real equality left here anymore.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 04:06 PM
10

Hi, you've just meet another.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 10:19 PM
3

Thanks for the correction.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:16 PM
4

Nobody read the article. No prisons are being closed, they're just scrapping the plans for a few women's prisons. The community service thing is for everyone commiting lesser crimes, not just women. Title is editorialized as fuck.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:45 AM
2

Guess what? If he turns 18 and decides he doesn't want a foreskin then he can have it removed. You don't have the right to make that decision for him on the off-chance that he'll be okay with it.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:33 PM
6

If your religion asks you to harm innocent babies then you are already being "suppressed" from doing so. Circumcision is just something that general public is uneducated on.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:31 PM
2

Thats likely but lets keep in mind that this is a great step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:38 PM
5

His movies are engaging and enthralling. He edits together good docs, he just puts misleading and false information in them. He's also kind of a douche when it comes to obtaining the material for them. When I first saw Farenheit 911 I thought "Michale Moore asks great questions but provides shitty answers". This was before I'd seen some of his other work like Capitalism, A Love Story, though. It's been a while since I've seen it but I don't think anything in that film was salvageable.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:00 PM
19

Thank you for being awesome.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:44 AM
1

Yeah first wave was so empowering what with it's demands to disempower people's choices to drink.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:09 PM
2

This sub, more than any, should be vehemently opposed to the death penalty. Until there is a non-zero number of false allegations and wrongful convictions, then murdering people as a punishment should not be a thing.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 12:43 AM
2

How about "nothing"?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:34 PM
0

Not usually. It's this petty childish shit that has caused much of the divide we have today.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:42 AM
5

But we should be trying to make all of their arguments invalid.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:46 AM
3

I really don't understand why your criticizing this post of all things. This subreddit has it's problems, I totally get that, but this post is a prime example of what this sub should be bringing attention to. Like seriously, what the fuck?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:58 AM
6

Hi, you must be new to America's rehabilitative faculties.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:22 PM
3

I wouldn't worry too much. I feel like right winged individuals have their ideologies challenged by the real world, which is a good thing. Left winged individuals rarely have their beliefs challenged like right winged ones do. There is so much my eyes were opened to in college and adulthood that led me to becoming a classic "liberal". However, for kids raised in left wing households, they just don't encounter many legitimate authority figures who can rationally challenge their beliefs.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:35 AM
1

The problem with using this argument is that a lot of Apollo 11 deniers do believe we landed on the moon, just much later than 1969. Since we're on the topic, does anyone have a list of articles or information that successfully debunks moon landing deniers arguments?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:29 PM
3

I know this doesnt work well for books, but can you gives us a Tl;dr?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:58 AM
-2

The only voice of reason I this thread and its sitting in the negatives.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:41 PM
3

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:46 PM
4

Guess what? A vagina would be a whole hell of a lot cleaner without labia. Do you think we should start removing the labia from baby girls?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:42 PM
5

Yes. Putting aside the fact that erections can happen for no reason at all sometimes (see: puberty), a big part of why rape is so traumatizing is that the body still responds to stimuli. Many women report being wet during their rape and a lot of the shame can come from the misbelief that they actually wanted it. And putting side both of those arguments, its possible to drug a man to induce an erection. Also, rape doesn't even have to involve the victim's penis.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:09 PM
1

But why would someone have to specify a "female feminist"? I thought you people believed gender is a social construct. Um what? You realize what subreddit you're in, correct? "Gender is a social construct" is a mostly SJW notion.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:24 PM
1

If this were actually a model car subreddit then I would agree with youm. However this is a gender issues subreddit. And fortunately the nature of gender issues today require a lot of clarification and semantics.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:02 PM
8

No, you replied to somebody who was talking about women. Then you behaved as though they said feminist. You conflated feminist and women even if it was just subconsciously.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:35 PM
34

Surprised about what? Feminists =!= women
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:12 PM
8

That's not a fair conclusion to jump to.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:36 PM
11

Ad hominems generally don't have a point.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 04:46 PM
2

Nobody reads articles anymore.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 04:45 PM
21

Thank you for doing what you do. I don't always agree with this sub but its nice to know the mods are interested in honesty and factual accuracy.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 04:43 PM
52

Yeah and his comment sounds disturbingly identical to one complaining about "manspreading".
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:14 PM
1

Yeah, I replaced men with "dirty Jews" in FoxReplace. It makes this kind of content more telling.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:40 PM
17

Ugh, redalertpolitics is such a shithole.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:41 PM
1

Dear God, please don't link to Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:24 AM
1

Where are all these police that get away with it? All over the news? Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, TV, etc. Seriously, if you aren't aware of US police brutality then it's not my job to educate you on it. There's a wealth of information at your fingertips.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:20 PM
0

It was anti-police state. Saying that the police kill people and get away with it isn't hatred. It's just fact. I doesn't mean that every single police officer is a terrible human being. It just means there's a systematic problem. By the way, being anti anything doesn't equal hatred. I'm anti-SJW but that doesn't I hate them.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:46 PM
-2

There wasn't any "hatred" in that comment.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 02:35 PM
24

"You're either with us or you're with the terrorists". Edit: In case of anyone's confusion, I was calling out the above comment on its absolutism.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:38 PM
3

Why is this? Is it just too hard to prove emotional abuse?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:08 PM
1

This isn't the debate we're having.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:17 PM
3

Circumcision is non consensual genital mutilation. It's pretty damned worthy of hatred. Being circumcised is another thing entirely. You should be proud of your body. But never should you defend the practice of circumcision save for instances of medical need,
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:06 AM
14

I think it's the conservative influence. Traditionalists are still pretty attached to archaic gender roles and customs. "Well, I was cut so I suppose I should have my son cut too". Or, my fucking favorite "Uncut penises are unattractive".
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:26 PM
10

Jesus Christ, it's disgusting how normalized this is.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:49 PM
20

Yes, it fucking is. What the hell subreddit am I even on?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:46 PM
1

Radicalization scares me more than anything in this world. And the worst part is that everyone is more radicalized more than ever now.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:14 AM
1

Thank you for coming here and being open. Not enough people do this. On either side.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 08:25 PM
0

When did I say there was anything wrong with anti-feminist? Re-read my comment, I said that there is a negative perception of anti-feminist culture and the comment I replied to contributes to this negative perception. how is recognizing female privilege sexist? And how is recognizing male privilege sexist? You do realize that you're essentially just mimicking the regressive left but changing the pronouns. If it's not okay when they do it, then it's not okay when we do it. You have stooped to the…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:41 PM
1

So since it's done to men it's okay for us to do it women? Have some goddamned consistency Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:08 AM
–

Look, I definitely agree that our culture is sexist in what it'll let women get away with, but your comment is exactly what we criticize radical SJWs for. "Toxic masculinity + male privilege is a dangerous combo for women." Seriously, that is shit straight from Sarkeesian's twitter. Its not okay for you to make a sexist statement like that and contribute to the negative perception of anti-feminist culture on the net. Goddamn, this sub has gone off the rails.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:06 AM
11

No. Scam stuff.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:01 PM
1

That isn't even the point.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:07 PM
1

Sorry. But Poe's Law and all that.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:16 PM
1

I can't tell if you're actually being sarcastic. Reddit has broken me.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:56 PM
1

But she was thirteen. And she was raped, just presumably not by the accused. A traumatic event like that can seriously Fuck a kid up, especially their memory. The blame should be placed on the justice system from letting a damaged 13 year old girls memory ruin a man's life. Oh wait, this argument is pointless because this article is from The Daily Mail. I wouldn't trust them to write a shopping list, much less practice proper journalism. For all we know, the victim was actually a parakeet.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:55 PM
2

What woman? It was a 13 year old girl.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:40 PM
1

Woman? What woman? It was a 13 year old girl who never recanted her testimony. This is another lie of a title from the daily mail. Read the damn article before you comment. You make this subreddit look like it's full of fools and gullible morons.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:40 PM
2

This is why this sub needs to cease posting links to TDM. It harms the whole movement when you legitimize tabloids.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:38 PM
3

Sigh, when will we stop linking to the Daily Mail? Of course the comments and content is shit, it's a fucking tabloid.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:37 PM
-7

Might as well give up. This sub isn't the same as it used to be three or so years ago :/
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:46 PM
27

I doubt it. Trump doesn't really strike me as an egalitarian. You have to realize that there are groups within the radical right who believe women are a special protected class, just from a different perspective than the radical left does. While Trump may not care either way, he's going to pander to his demographic. Just like Hillary would have.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:45 PM
5

Uh, how about fuck no? Speech isn't a hate crime, despite how much it may hurt your feelings. Jesus Christ, this mentality has seeped into every corner of the internet, even the ones that were traditionally created to oppose it.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:36 PM
-2

Do you have any links or data that backs up that assetion? I'd always thought the majority of serial killers were in fact white men. But I'd love to know it if I were wrong. Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 11:26 AM
1

No that's just called being realistic. The tampon tax is stupid, but no where near as stupid as things like the war on drugs.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 03:07 PM
30

It should still be allowed though. Sure we can shit on it, but not pressure artists to censor their creations, even if we disagree with it. People are allowed to be bigoted assholes.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:41 PM
17

Or if we start counting prison rape.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:54 PM
6

I know you're joking but this is the kind of shit that people think is the policy of the MRM.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:53 PM
0

Eh, nobody takes Jezebel seriously, except for SJWs anyway. Whenever somebody points to it as a valid example of the opposition it's hard for me to buy it. It's like pointing to Donald Trump as a valid example of racism. He's playing a role in a theater show. I don't think he buys any of the shit he spews. Similarly, Jezebel exists to farm those clicks from lonely, hate-filled, insecure SJWs. You can certainly attribute that to shoddy and pathetic journalism though.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:52 PM
5

The internet became more widely available. The infinite access to pornography has made rape a thing relegated only to those who get off on the power trip and those with mental illnesses.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:48 PM
0

No. It isn't.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:31 PM
1

Refusal to accept the right does not equal an automatic acceptance of the left. It's possible to refute both.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:31 PM
1

I mean, any women who is actually being paid less for equal work is any lawyers wet dream. A woman in /r/libertarian said she was in that situation. Most of us advised her to find a lawyer. Most attorneys would take that kind of case at no upfront cost. Cases like that are open and shut.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:40 PM
1

No it doesn't. Sociology is a study, not an organization or a group of people. You're thinking of modern sociology students.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:25 AM
1

What the hell is this subreddit's problem with Sociology. You guys are just being contrarian to conform. This isn't the men's rights that was around when I joined the movement.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 12:45 AM
1

I doubt that all of them believe it. You realize that politicians play the cards that will get them the most points, right? Even the least of the evils will do this, like Sanders. Hell, I've seen Gary Johnson pander to a degree, and that man is a saint as far as politicians go, in my book. It's the only way to play this shitty game, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:36 AM
1

Human rights is a part of Sociology. I'm not really sure what you're on about.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:34 AM
3

Well, technically a gap DOES exist. It just doesn't exist for the reason that the myth claims it does. Women earn less than men, not get paid less than men. They earn less than men because they work different types of jobs, work fewer hours less than men, and are much less likely to seek promotions or negotiate for higher salaries than men are. A man and a woman working the same job for the same employer, by law, must be paid the same. But statistically speaking, women do earn less than men do, …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:31 AM
-6

I rather believe that was the point.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:47 AM
32

So did Obama. This isn't really a surprise. It's pandering. I'm sure there are plenty of right-winged politicans who have supported the myth as well.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:47 AM
10

Why is this being downvoted?? It's true. Might I remind most of you that Men's Rights is indeed a subsection of sociology, as well? Don't let socjus come and take over a long-respected field.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:46 AM
3

Maybe modern sociology is bunk...but I wouldn't disparage the entire field. Don't let these fuckers take over well-respected and established academai.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:44 AM
2

I think lodging a complain would be more productive and mature.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:58 AM
0

Really? Because it seems like both are done without the consent of the owner of the dick. This is a pretty simple concept, keep sharp things away from other peoples' genitals, unless they ask you to.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:59 PM
3

Most other Christians I've spoken to (In northern virginia, for the most part) agree when pressed. It has nothing to do with being a Christian. Heck, I'm a Christian. It's purely an American thing. Christians in other parts of the world would be horrified to consider needless circumcision (please note, the cases where circumcision is necessary are incredibly rare).
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:11 PM
1

I care. I didn't get a choice in my circumcision. I would love to be uncircumcised and experience sex with my genitals intact, but that's something that will never happen for me and there's nothing I can do about it. And neither do the thousands of male babies who are circumcised every day. Look at this objectively...you are literally removing part of a person's genitals. If you'd grown up without balls I'm sure you wouldn't miss them too much, because you'd be normalized to life without them an…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:08 PM
2

Well, I do. I would kill to get that part of my body back, but it doesn't really work that way. If your parents had castrated you at birth, I'm fairly certain you would feel okay about that now, too, as you wouldn't know anything different. This old excuse for circumcision doesn't stand anymore. Just because you don't care about your body doesn't make it okay to maim infant boys across the country.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:04 PM
8

Of course it does. But this was done to one man. Male circumcision is done, everyday, to thousands of babies who cannot consent, get away, or plead for mercy. They're literally helpess and their parents go chopping off some of the most sensitive skin on their bodies as soon as they pop out. I think a lot of people could recognize the OP's link as a criminal violation of the man's body. But virtually nobody recognizes male circumcision as genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:30 PM
24

Well, male genital mutilation goes on every day in clinics and hospitals in what are supposed to be civilized, first world countries, yet nobody bats an eye to it.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:10 PM
16

Even then it doesn't have the same far-reaching consequences. A woman can still urinate naturally without her clit. She can still technically have sex and is still capable of having children. It's hard to come up with a female equivalent to penectomy. Or maybe I just don't want to think about it long enough.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:09 PM
3

Are you kidding? Men do not have the right to voat or work until they sign up for selective service. Women are born with those rights.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:57 AM
48

I think it's telling that we're looking at the draft from the perspective of "Is a male-only draft misogynist?" rather than "Is a male-only draft misandrist?".
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:55 AM
2

It's nothing like askwomen.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:19 AM
1

Not surprising in the slightest. Feminism long ago lost its way.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:43 PM
1

Who does?? Do you realize that a lot of the most obstinate feminists are men? Seriously, this comment totally misses the point.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:41 PM
66

No, it's not harassment. It's brigading, but not harassment. Just because the rest of Reddit likes to pretend everything that they do not like is harassment doesn't mean we should do it.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:40 PM
7

Do we know it's SJWs, though? I mean, no doubt this sub gets brigaded a lot and no doubt that a lot of times it's from places like SRS or SRD. However, on a case by case basis we can't say without any confirmatory evidence who is behind it. Maybe I'm just jaded with everything. I would like to stop blaming everything blanketly on SJWs and just focus on the poor tactics/arguments. Obviously somebody is brigading us, but it could be third party trolls for all we know.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:40 PM
7

I remember predicting around five or six years ago that these kind of gender stereotypes would be flipped in around half a century.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:34 AM
3

But, the guy describes his boxer shorts far more clearly than his anger or anything else in the story for that matter Yes, because that's one of the most mortifying things about the story. I would have described that as well, so that the reader would know just how embarrassing the event was. Would people flip out and claim the story teller is being unfairly sexualized? Probably. They would be wrong then too. You can't just decide that.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 01:16 AM
3

This post needs a Misleading Title flair.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:33 PM
2

Well I'm seeing a lot of "man up" sentiment near the bottom, which is fairly common in Red-Pillism.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:53 PM
1

Ah, wasn't sure what you were referring to. Yeah, those comments seem more in fitting with TRP.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 06:22 AM
3

It's assault. Apparently unwanted.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:49 AM
1

Example?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:48 AM
5

Now that is something you don't see every day! It's certainly not. Although we had a post from a feminist a month or so ago who came seeking common ground for male victims of domestic violence. That post was really fucking inspirational. Everyone was civil with each other, for the most part.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:46 AM
7

Does anyone else have a sneaking suspicion that he chose that story to give females that exact mental picture? It's the same idea of answering your biggest weakness as "perfectionist". Flip the sexes and see how that sounds? No, I do not think he intended for that to happen.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:08 AM
1

Black Out What's the difference? I don't drink or party, so I'm not sure what I'm missing. I wasn't trying to exaggerate anything.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 08:53 PM
97

Wait a minute... So this woman sucked the dick of a guy who was passed out, without his consent, regretted it, and then accused him of rape? Am I misunderstanding something? Why is nobody else here raging?? She raped him! How the fuck can anyone take her accusation seriously? What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights20/06/15 06:53 PM
2

Yeah we know, grandpa.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 10:10 PM
1

They're called STIs for Sexually Transmitted Infections...
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:56 PM
3

They've been retermed as STIs, because not all sexually transmitted infections are diseases. It's not some cool street slang...it's medical terminology.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:20 AM
2

Of course they do, don't be silly. After Watergate, however, the suffix of -gate was added to the American lexicon.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 11:05 AM
43

I think David's gender identity was not "male" but "complicated". It doesn't really work that way. Even transgender people identify strongly as one gender or the other. David reasserted himself as male, because he was male.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:05 PM
6

To be fair, I've seen plenty of screenshots like this featuring female commenter saying very similar things. It's just that I think the men are more likely to make it out not to be a big deal.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:12 PM
6

Depends on how you define terrible. One or both of them might have not been 'terrible' people. People make bad decisions because of unfortunately life situations. The reason robberies are so high in low poverty areas is because the robbers are desperate. Robbery is certainly immoral, but isn't rape more so? And (of course the ends do not justify the means) you have to look at the reasoning behind each crime.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:10 PM
13

"All it takes for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing."
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:36 PM
2

Well, I wouldn't go quite that far, but it may depend where at in the South you moved to. Down here the more mainstream "normal" everyday folk are as you say "Your life isn't any of my business, I'm going to be polite to you no matter what". But then we have the fundamentalist groups who, although they don't represent the majority, have such a louder voice than the saner, more apathetic people, that make us look bad. For example, in my state, we have one judge who has been fighting agaisnt marri…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:21 AM
2

There are times I'm thankful for living in the south (US). There is still a fair bit of ignorance and bigotry down here, but generally speaking even the more liberal people here are at least disinterested in feminism. My gay best friend is actually more conservative on politics than I am and has all but cut ties with the LGBT because of the recent SJW takeover there.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:28 PM
4

why Because there are already things on the list that shouldn't be there. if i am outside and take a piss in the park because i have to go and there is nowhere else to go and someone calls the police on me that could put me on a sexual predator list. Yeah, that shouldn't get you on to the list either. We should be removing bullshit reasons that get you on the sex offender's list not adding them. falsely accusing someone of rape is a willingly deceptive use of a sexual premise to destroy an innoc…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:00 AM
1

It won't. All of human history tells us that.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:47 AM
4

Right, but you didn't provide that context in your comment. It looks really bad and now someone with agenda against us will ignore your explanation, but take your first comment as proof that MRAs are misogynistic assholes. Each one of us represents the subreddit. We value free speech of course, but be careful how you say things. We're already a marginalized group...don't give people ammo to slander us with.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:43 AM
1

women aren't necessarily treated fairly when it comes to promotions. It isn't that they are treated unfairly, it's that women are statistically less likely to request raises or seek promotions because of varying societal and psychological differences. Which sadly just gives corporations like reddit the excuse to prohibit salary negotiations altogether because it isn't "fair" or "equal".
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:41 PM
1

So two wrongs make a right??
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:12 PM
2

Uh, of course he is. Everyone deserves due process you know.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:12 PM
28

No, there should be an entirely separate list of false accusers.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:11 PM
0

Except he doesn't. The wage gap is a myth that's been debunked time and time again.''
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:10 PM
6

One of Bernie Sanders main points is the fact that women get paid less than men and this needs to be changed. Except that is factually incorrect and has been proven false many many times. It's beyond time for this myth to be abandoned.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:08 PM
1

Because it's the military where you're supposed to just suck it and deal with unfairness. Which kind of explains why feminist though patterns are finding it appealing.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:27 AM
3

No, it's because you're spewing vitriol.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:23 AM
1

I could easily see an opposite story being posed in this sub as "Judge awards custody to mother, despite her blindness." Honestly, this article is so biased and poorly written that I can't take it seriously. I think that the family courts are shit. But I'm not so sure that this is an actual example of that.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:19 PM
3

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the guy isn't even playing the race card, it's the media that's doing so. However, I do believe that there is just too much information we don't have at the moment to make a judgement.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:22 PM
1

Isn't that......racist?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:19 PM
1

Yeah, after watching the video I'm wondering there isn't something we're missing out on. It very well could just be that she's a raging bigot, but I'm just trying to figure out why any sane human would act this way. I feel like we don't have all the information.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:17 PM
8

and clearly this sub stands behind that thought Uh, how is this clear?? Have you ever even visited this subreddit before?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:09 PM
-2

Yeah I guess the statistically higher chance of being murdered by a cop is a wonderful opportunity that's been given to the black man. Look, I won't argue that white women are an incredibly privileged demographic right now, but you're fucking kidding yourself if you think that that black men have been keyed in on most of that privilege.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:07 PM
2

I consider myself Reddit and I had no part in that shitfest in the slightest. If I'd been that far down in the thread where that went on I would have decried it, for what good it would have done.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:54 PM
8

I agree with everything you said, I just don't like the term 'reverse sexist'. But I get what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:52 PM
4

Thank God. I'm so sick of people treating the Daily Mail like it isn't a tabloid.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:52 AM
1

Replace women with people and I'll agree. There are few decent people in the world.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:18 PM
1

How exactly is gun education going to prevent or at least reduce gang activity, robberies, murder, and all the other issues with guns? Those aren't issues with the legality of guns. Those are issues with allowing guns to be stolen or placed in a black market, a black market which would explode with success if gun ownership was criminalized.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:12 PM
1

So maybe that's a harassment case against the girl. Laws regarding "harassment" have gotten incredibly overreaching in recent years. The accusation has begun to lose all meaning. I definitely agree that sharing nude pics of someone who hasn't authorized you to share this is immoral, but the law shouldn't become involved. It's too open to abuse and ultimately comes down to he-said/she-said drama.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:47 PM
5

The sex ed, gun rights, and drug war debates are all essentially the same argument, just with different players, objects, and labels. It's crazy, though, how both sides of the US political spectrum will not be consistent amongst those three issues. People on the extreme right believe that guns are something that you can't keep away from people, so it might as well be accepted so that it's done safely, yet they believe that all drugs should be illegal and kids should be taught abstinence only edu…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:49 AM
1

Don't know why you down voted. I didn't. Didn't say we should criminalize. I know you didn't, but a lot of people are based on the example you gave. You presented their reasoning as a devil's advocate so I countered that. I was merely pointing out that on this particular issue society will not be happy either way legal or not. There's a point though, where modern psychology should be making aware the fact that kids are humans too, and it's totally normal for them to be sexual. To me, teaching so…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:44 AM
3

So that warrants criminalizing it? A lot of people are worried about rape as well, but they don't want to criminalize sex to solve tha-oh wait, nevermind, they do.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:29 AM
1

Unfortunately, the law sees it differently :/
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:26 AM
2

When you're done being sex negative, maybe you should seek out a feminist sub? They run in flocks there.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:20 AM
2

Yeah man, the world has gone to crap, people breeding and practicing perfectly normal human behavior is disgusting! Seriously, this is shit a feminist would say.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:13 AM
3

because none of us want teens sexting each other I still just don't understand this. Isn't this better than teens going out and having unsafe sex?? Sexting is an even safer alternative than oral. You can't stop kids from doing the most natural thing in the world, you might as well permit them to do the safest form of sex you can imagine.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:11 AM
7

No, we need to stop going after kids entirely. They're just kids. It's kinda human for them to be interested in sex.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:05 AM
6

Systems are not sacred. Systems quite often are the enemies of true progress and fairness. If you don't fight it, things will never change.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:07 PM
1

No. Petty insults do nothing to reach people, it only pushes them farther away. Some of their tactics and ideas may be rather moronic, but attacking them will only give them a persecution complex and cause your integrity to be chipped down into a similar shape to their integrity.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:51 PM
3

I agree, but let's not resort to the "pissbabies" bullshit. That's sinking to their level.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:09 PM
8

Not sure why this was down voted. It's a perfectly reasonable and fair look at the analogy. Feminism did accomplish its goals. That's why it began searching for new goals.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:08 PM
6

Hey buddy, let me introduce you to my friend satire.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:05 PM
5

I disagree with the unattractive bit. I never understood the whole conventional thing to begin with.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:04 PM
1

I don't mean safe space in that free speech should be restricted by moderators, but that it should be a safe space from warrantless attacks for simply having a passion for men's issues. Not a safe space created by the moderators, but created by the users. Seeing such a sexist comment get 49 upvotes here was disappointing and a little heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:02 AM
4

Well, I'm American.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:49 PM
1

It didn't used to be this way. It was actually quite nice.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:41 PM
5

When he invites anyone who is upset about being circumcised to fuck off, then yes, it's really necessary.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:38 PM
22

The pro-male genital mutilation sentiment in this thread is outright revolting. If you want to be circumcised then that's fine, but don't forcibly cut off parts of your baby's genitals because you want him to look like his father. It sucks ass to know you never had a choice. This subreddit was supposed to be a safe space from attacks like these: "To all of the little boys crying about having their dicks cut, I would like to cordially invite you to go fuck yourselves. Idiots.". At fucking 49 upvo…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:54 PM
2

I can't believe this has so many upvotes. Well, as somebody who has complications (not that should even fucking matter) from his unconsensual circumcision, I would like to invite you to go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:50 PM
9

This absolutely happens in America.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:48 PM
7

Uhh no...this isn't a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:47 PM
3

Excellent rebuttal.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:49 PM
4

This is not at all relevant.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:38 PM
11

So do men. Take this shit elsewhere. This is why people have a poor opinion of us. They see nonsense like this. If you want to shittalk about an entire gender based on the actions of one comedian, then don't do it here. You're misrepresenting what we're about.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:37 PM
1

I personally don't, but shock humor is successful, albeit sometimes niche. I've seen attractive comediennes who never got anywhere because they weren't funny. Silverman would be what she is if she wasn't funny. I used to find her attractive after finding out what kind of person she is and what she stands for. It's one those things where, in another dimension, I could probably find Anita Sarkeesian attractive. As it is, that very idea is unfathomable to me.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:35 PM
3

That's shock humor, though. The Superbowl thing wasn't shock humor. Although, I don't think we should be censoring comedy at all.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:15 PM
1

It doesn't matter what you think she should be called. She's a feminist. Men's Rights by name dictates that our movement is solely for men. How is that any different. Don't decide to dislike anyone with the label of feminist. Dislike them because their opinions are faulty or they're genuinely bad people.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:51 PM
2

I didn't think she was conservative.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:35 AM
1

Don't you think that MRAs will do the same thing when the day eventually comes that the MRM is no longer on track with its goals? Labeled aren't east to abandon, especially when you've grown attached to your movement,
/r/MensRights30/03/15 01:01 AM
2

Chock full*
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:59 AM
2

Don't ever see it for left-wing posts Ehhr, yes you do. I mean c'mon, the right wing isn't exactly super respectable either. Whenever somebody attaches the word 'wing' to either side, it's pretty safe to say that they're referring to polarized sides of the parties. However, if George W. Bush came out told everyone that 5+5=10, he would still be correct.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:57 AM
9

You realize that CH Sommers is a feminist, right?? Believe it or not, there are a handful of feminists who are rational, even if the movement at large is corrupt. Regardless of that, though, you shouldn't hate anybody. Especially a generalized label that applies to an enormous group of people.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:54 AM
2

Is she conservative?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:51 AM
3

What, why? That sub is generally more accepting of anti feminist material
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:50 AM
5

Those are called arguments.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:50 AM
9

Yeah, this is one of the main reasons I have such a problem with SJWs. They would rather attack the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. Admittedly, I'm noticing this happening in some men's rights circles as well. It actually started by noticing it in myself and realizing that such a thing is not okay. It's easy to attack the argumenter with somebody like Anita Sarkeesian, but it's important to remember that doing so only feeds her victim complex. After I started trying t…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:38 AM
1

You know, men aren't the only ones who browse this sub.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:58 PM
2

Er...except the people who up voted this thread. I mean, come on really? You say that one side can't take a joke, yet there are people here who want the anti-male ones discontinued as well. I don't think either product should be removed. And honestly, I feel like this entire thread is kind of petty. Men's Rights should be focusing on real problems.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:23 AM
6

Uh, women are not paid less. That's a myth that has been debunked over and over.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:21 AM
2

about bird flu and Ebola Uhh, those were big deals...I mean, the rape statistics were totally bogus because Mary Koss fudged the research with rigged questions and definitions. But she didn't have anything to do with Ebola coverage. The idea that Ebola isn't a big deal is kind of asinine. I just think they'll say anything to get attention and funding for their buddies projects. Well, I'll give you that. This is pretty much the primary goal of almost any organization whether it be government like…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:55 PM
2

Well, they're the ones behind the 1 in 5 women rape statistic as well. They've always handled IPV and sex crimes.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 02:54 AM
5

What do you mean? The Avengers movies were done by Joss Whedon, an SJW. Hell, the SJW vibe reeks in those movies.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:28 PM
2

No, he was not. He was arguing the point that he needed his foreskin. You are putting words into his mouth.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:11 PM
2

Forcibly removing a portion of somebody's body without medical reason is mutilation. In the middle east, they call it atrocity. In the US, they call it healthcare. It's disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:58 PM
2

You don't fucking get to decide that for someone. Jesus fucking Christ.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:40 PM
5

This was a reassuring story. While I'm sure there are a fair number of domestic violence cases where the abuser eventually "sees the light" and turns over a new leaf, it's important to let others know this isn't always the case. If it does happen then that's a truly wonderful thing and I do believe that everyone deserves a second chance. But you're right about breaking the cycle. When you're in that situation, you need to do what you need to do in order to exit that environment, with the full in…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:34 AM
4

How in the fuck did she think that putting your little girl in foster care was a good idea??? She still has a parent who wants her. What kind of fucked up people would prefer that a child be put in foster care rather than live with her father? I'm sorry, but just reading that pissed me off. That isn't a solution to what your problem was.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:28 AM
5

How can you attribute the maternalism thing to patriarchy when that idea didn't even really exist until feminism?? Before feminism, men usually got custody of the children because they were seen as a better provider. Now feminism has ingrained in us that children should be with their mother because the mother somehow provides better care for the kids and that the mother is somehow more special. So, are you saying that feminism is "the Patriarchy"?? Because feminism is the one that propagated the…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:05 PM
1

I'm just saying that the quality of his writing isn't a mark against the possibility of its authenticity. Actually, the way one of these personal accounts is written is usually the first thing that fails to hold up to scrutiny when a story is false. If it reads like fiction, then it often is discovered to be fiction. You're right that if his story is true, then he has a good reason for the quality of his writing. But that still does not verify it.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:38 AM
2

That's a possibility, but it isn't evidence. It's just another unverified aspect. Personally, I don't think it matters at the moment if it's fake or not. The worst that could happen is that we give support to somebody who doesn't need it. I imagine that by the time a lawyer would be involved, we will know the validity of the story. But you shouldn't accept everything at face value. We Trust and Verify here, we don't Listen and Believe.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:36 AM
1

In a place like suicide watch, I feel like that would be a given.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:34 AM
2

Yeah, I mean...all we're doubting is the story's existence. It's not like I'm saying "prove you didn't rape her eyes!" If he's being untruthful, then he's being untruthful about the whole kit and kaboodle. But maybe recording some audio of his parents talking to him about it or some kind of record of his situation would do a lot to solidify his story. I don't see anything wrong with giving him kind words, telling him that he can talk to any of us, but in the meantime ask him to rustle up some ki…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:33 AM
14

Who the fuck would even say that? A high school SJW.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 11:07 AM
5

So you'd prefer Listen and Believe? Let's go with Trust but Verify instead. The story is incredibly well-written which does suggest it being a fake, however I don't want to take the chance on ignoring this kid if his story is in fact real. Saying that you don't believe his story does not mean that you accept the alternative of his side (which is that he actually said those things). If it is fake, then the girl likely doesn't exist either. This is definitely something that this subreddit should t…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 11:04 AM
3

Fair point, but that argument is usually made invalid by the existence of throwaway accounts. I would say that the way it's written would be the only thing to detract from the story's legitimacy.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:59 AM
1

That was a joke...
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:04 AM
2

should of should have, motherfucker. Edit: and to address your point... You should of acknowledged the situation you where in and moved physically as far away from it as possible. Not everyone is in the headspace where they can do that. Abusive partners can do all sorts of things to manipulate their victim into staying.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:27 AM
3

Yeah, I found that a bit offensive as well. Remember guys, there's a clear difference between us and the red pill.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:30 AM
-1

Don't you see that that is exactly why you can't give consent as a minor?? You're young and your hormones are raging...there's no way that you can make a logical choice to consent nor are you mature enough to. Don't you think that some cases of statutory rape of female minors are committed with the young girl thinking that she consents to the act?? Minors are not old enough to consent to sex with the adults for multiple reasons. That's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:21 PM
3

It's depressing that my immediate suspicion when seeing this is that it's another hoax just fishing for responses that can be twisted into meaning something sexist to make us look bad again. :(
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:02 PM
20

the only ones for men were anger management This is disgusting and why the MRM is needed.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:21 AM
1

She's a woman. She's not a man.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:07 PM
1

All I'm saying is that this situation is very, very rare. First of all, it's not rare, it happens so much more than people think. Second of all, even if it was incredibly rare that wouldn't matter, it shouldn't happen at all and saying that it's rare would not be a defense against it. Even if only one man was affected, it would be a travesty. American justice was built on the idea that we would rather that 10 guilty men go free than have 1 innocent man wrongly convicted. That doesn't change when…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:25 PM
2

Mine could have been much worse. It never went beyond having my reputation eroded and losing a few friends. I wouldn't say it changed my life as I already knew this sort of thing happens, but it certainly contributed to the progressive embittering of me.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:19 PM
11

Unfortunately, when people preach the whole listen and believe dogma, good people fall victim to that logic. Most of the people who believed her weren't real friends, but there were friends of mine with whom my friendship was effected. Before the accusation, a lot of people there thought I was a genuinely good person. It actually bolstered my confidence quite a bit when people would trust me with things or when I'd hear from a close friend that a lot of the people there liked me. I don't know ho…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:21 AM
3

At least you acknowledged your oversight. A lot don't do that. Thank you, for that. But I do see it as a societal lack of ability to acknowledge male victim hood. I mean, the phrase made to penetrate itself is poorly worded as they consider it to be a separate term from rape. The legal definition of the word rape is being forcibly penetrated. Which means that it's legally not possible for a male to be raped by female. And it seems like every time one of these young male students are victims of s…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:15 AM
6

Benefit of the doubt is not refusal to investigate. The police in this story actually refused to investigate and arrested the man anyway. They should have checked the CCTV tapes before ever arresting him. If they had, this whole thing never would have happened. They didn't investigate shit until his life was already ruined. This is what a guilty until proven innocent justice system is like. I don't fucking understand what it is with you people who think that rape should be a special crime that d…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:00 AM
2

I'll give you two guesses.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:55 PM
3

It's ridiculous that this even needs to be pointed out. Society lacks a fundamental ability to believe that men can be raped. I'm sorry, but I'm so sick of seeing this over and over and over. There's a point where emotion just takes over and I become angry that these things even need to be said.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:54 PM
2

It's not women. It's out shitty justice system and media networks.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:51 PM
8

What are you talking about? It's not like you lose if you can't prove you were raped. It has to be proven that you lied about being raped which is entirely different from it being proven that you weren't raped. It wouldn't prevent any real victims from coming forward at all. It's actually incredibly difficult to prove a false allegation. Barring a confession, there aren't many ways to do it. The ones who are proven should definitely receive an equal sentence to what the accused would have receiv…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:45 PM
3

You should never give "benefit of the doubt" to any accuser. That is a total miscarriage of due process.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:40 PM
26

My ex-girlfriend was pissed that I broke up with her after putting up with six months of her abuse, so she told all of our coworkers that I raped her. Nobody told me until nearly a year later. Everyone had lost their respect for me by then though and I couldn't regain it. Nothing legal ever came of it, but I lost some friends and eventually quit working there because everything just felt so dark when I was around those people. I still get really angry when I think about it. She will never have t…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:36 PM
15

Maybe she didn't believe him :/ A lot of people seem to have problems believing men when they say they're innocent of a rape/sexual assault claim. I sure as hell know that everyone took her at her word when an ex accuse me of it. Unfortunately, I didn't even get to proclaim innocence as nobody told me I'd been accused.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:31 PM
2

Try to have some JOIN 2015 WITH THE REST OF US, FUCKTARD.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:45 PM
12

It's also not legal to call without a real emergency.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:15 PM
2

I want everyone to remember that this young lady would be considered a sock puppet (not a real human being) by people who claim to stand for equality.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 04:16 AM
1

Does it really cause of lack of sensitivity? Absolutely. Anybody who told you that it is untrue is highly misinformed. Haven't you ever heard uncircumcised guys talk about their foreskin in regards to sex? Hell, if you even search for your circumcision scar you'll find it's a lot more sensitive than the rest of the penis. I thought it was done for health concerns such as for hygienic purposes? Again, bullshit. Circumcision began in America due to an old wives tale that suggested it would prevent…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:16 PM
0

I guess we should put female genital mutilation in the middle East at the bottom of the list of greatest threats to women too, hmm?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:58 PM
18

The draft hasn't been enacted since Vietnam. This is not a proper defense. I'm so sick of people parroting this. It CAN be enacted and the simple fact that women are born with more rights than men is fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:52 AM
16

Well, that's the pretty much what the majority of all circumcisions are.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:50 AM
9

Because an infant doesn't have the ability to consent to an unnecessary operation. There is absolutely no health benefits to being circumcised and being circumcised actually causes a decrease in sensitivity of the penis.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:49 AM
4

Guess what? There's more to reddit than just /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:35 PM
47

I would say the greatest threat to men in our modern society would be selective service and circumcision, but reproductive rights are a close third. Men literally don't even have the same rights as women. Men have to sign up for selective service to earn their rights. Women are born with them.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:32 PM
24

Of course it does. The mother is usually given the sole right to decide if she wants to give the baby up for adoption. Fathers really don't get a say.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:28 PM
4

I have actually been told this before. "Fear boners are not a thing" is what they said, if I recall correctly. I'm not wrong though. You know, you can't just decide that because you think you aren't wrong. You are wrong. Stop being so fucking absolutist.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:26 PM
12

Uh, why does it matter if it's a Republican? Can we not bring the parties into this, please?? It makes it look to outsiders like the MRM is a conservative movement. It isn't.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:07 PM
13

Dear God. They're not children.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:36 AM
38

The problem is feminism.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:35 AM
2

If you don't have to sign up for selective services to have the right to vote and work then you have female privilege.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:00 AM
1

Dear Christ, I can actually see this happening. That's how frightening this pandering to feminists has become.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:46 AM
1

Probably because nobody said it.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 07:16 PM
0

You aren't doing an awful lot to help your cause. If you want to convince people that TRP isn't what the standard opinion is, you need to lose the snark.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:47 AM
2

This is inevitable with any organization or party. I'm sure one day that the MRM willl lose it's way, as well. When that day comes, there'll hopefully be something that steps up to take it's place. It's a tale as old as time.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:30 PM
2

Where the fuck did he say that? You're reading things that aren't there.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:28 PM
2

Yes I do. I have even visited the subreddit before, y'know, making statements or accusations about it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 12:51 AM
1

that she insists on calling herself a feminist? Uh maybe because she still has a ton of follower who identify as feminist? I don't deny that third-wavers have co-opted the feminist movement for themselves, but that does not mean that every person who identifies as a feminist is a third-waver. CH Sommers actually considers herself an Equity Feminist Don't just assume that any female that sounds like she cares about men is automatically an MRA. So we just distrust anyone? Her being a female doesn'…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:39 AM
1

It's this attitude that gives us a bad name on Reddit. I realize that comments like this are usually always downvoted, but for the love of Christ, can we cut this bullshit viewpoint? Who cares if she identifies as a feminist? She's a great woman and has done a lot for the MRM. It's this kind of zealous hatred at a mere label that drives SJWs to their radical actions and statements.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:21 AM
2

Because she is one? Believe it or not, there are a few sane, good-hearted feminists remaining. It's third-wave feminism that we're fighting against and while third-wavers have largely co-opted that movement, it's still okay for second-wave feminists to carry that title. Check out /r/feMRAdebates if you're interested. It helped me realize that it's possible identify as a feminist and an MRA, though I personally only consider myself to be an MRA and an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:18 AM
3

Yep! Gotta keep those men from conspiring! God knows all they think about is destroying femininity. Jesus, this sentiment is fucking crazy. Do you really think that when men have their own spaces all they think about is hurting women or feminists? Seriously, get over yourself. "It's not all about you, Brianna."
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:21 AM
9

It really drives me crazy how everyone can shut down any argument I present by checking my comment/post history and saying "Oh, he's an MRA, of course he would say that." Why are people, even non-feminists, so vitriolic to the mere idea of a men's rights movement? We get so much hate on Reddit. They won't even entertain the idea that we might have some valid reasons to exist or do what we do. They group us all into a basket of crazy extremism and conflate us with RedPill-ism, when I'm sure many …
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:18 AM
1

You might want to go back, edit, and re-clarify. I think the way your original comment was phrased threw a lot of people off.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:46 AM
6

I don't think you understand what is going on here. We are arguing against it.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:46 AM
8

"/s" Here, you dropped this.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:03 AM
5

With the way that trans rights and the community is treated in the US, I would say that probably do, at least in most states.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:01 AM
2

Maybe it was in the paperwork when I registered to vote and I've just never realized. Pretty sure this was this case. I think even if it's not "in the paperwork" they do it for you when you register to vote. Let me put it this way...there's no way you could legally have a job or vote if you aren't signed up...unless you're female, that is.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:01 AM
10

I'm pretty sure when you register to vote, they automatically sign you up. Since men don't have the right to vote (or work) unless they sign up. I've heard of people be signed up for it by their school when they graduate.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:00 AM
8

Because "there will never be a draft" is a bullshit lie that shouldn't be believed?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:55 AM
13

Meaning that men don't actually have rights unless they sign up for selective service. Women, on the other hand will always have their rights.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:54 AM
-1

Well, no, but a lot of people recorded things with their flip phones. And most digital cameras of the time had featured video recording for years.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:41 AM
-5

What do you mean? Probably what?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:40 AM
1

It's not that we don't want to believe it...it's just that average member on this sub has been made bitter and cynical. And as wonderfully heartwarming this story is, it feels too good to be true :(
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:44 AM
6

and the first iPhone had just come out, Jesus fucking Christ, I almost called this out as bullshit until I did the math. Excuse me while I go soak my dentures. so the impulse to film everything wasn't even part of our culture yet Also, this isn't really true.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:36 AM
15

I know this is sarcasm and a joke, but just thought it needed to be said to any newcomers that this isn't a serious suggestion. "Teaching" anyone, male or female, not to rape others is not something that needs to be done. I mean, I guess that parents do need to have that initial discussion when their child first learns what rape is...but the idea that boys need to taught that they all have a sexual deviant inside of them that they must control because it will make them rape somebody is crazy.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:52 AM
0

Do you realize that this is literally the same things that SJWs say about men? This is why movements like Men's Rights exist, because of this extremist absolutist hatred.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:15 PM
1

I am 6' tall. It would be hard to tell who is taller if I stood next to a 5'11" 1/2 tall fellow, but these women would consider him undesirable
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:38 PM
1

A true comparison would be breast size. While there is surgery for that, it isn't normally possible to just get bigger boobs, just like it's impossible to become taller.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:37 PM
3

It isn't legally possible in some parts of America, is it?? Rape is described as forced penetration by a penis. It's a disgusting standard that has no business existing in the year 2015.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:26 PM
3

Fail all else, this is an important factor. I know it's really hard and it requires you to sacrifice even more after having already been through so much, but your actions could potentially save someone else from being raped and violated like you were. So sorry that you've had to go through all of this. It seems like you have a lot of courage.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:24 PM
1

Just want to say that I'm really sorry for what you've been through and I desperately hope that you find some assistance. Your post has really tugged on my heartstrings this morning. You guys catch a lot of flack on Reddit I've thought about this and have been trying to figure out why. I think most of them have never even visited this subreddit. It's popular to hate on MRAs, but only because I think that the ones who are really vocal about hating us are the extremist SJWs. Then, Reddit being as …
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:20 PM
1

How is rape not the point you were trying to make? My point that, whether you're talking about the woman being raped or beaten, it shouldn't be condones. First you assumed rape then assumed the other things. What did I assume now. That was literally a quote from your comments. just trying to cover your tracks to keep your illusion of being morally superior intact. Clarifying what I meant is not "covering my tracks". I'm sorry that you believe I'm operating under the illusion of moral superiority…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:14 PM
0

That may very well be and that should certainly be addressed within itself. But outside of that discussion, beatings shouldn't be condoned either.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:27 PM
1

I give examples of horrible things in prison that aren't rape, to show how stupid it is to jump straight to "omg he must mean rape!". I'm not arguing for that anymore. I accept that that isn't what you meant. I corrected a mistake you made and you're tell me to stop arguing over tiny details? Go to hell, you piece of shit. That isn't what I meant. I'm not telling you not to correct me. I'm telling you that it being rape wasn't really my point. My point was that wishing her "life is a living hell…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:23 PM
2

Yeah, man. Fuck human rights anyway. /s
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:57 PM
0

And how is a fair prison sentence the same as torture and beatings???? 15 years isn't cruel and unusual punishment. Beating a prisoner is.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:55 PM
4

Stop being a smartass, nobody is suggesting that a woman has a penis. You're supposed to imagine an equivalent act performed upon a three-year old girl, not the exact literal act. Jesus fucking Christ, Reddit today.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:48 PM
-4

The rape detail wasn't even the most important part. Considering that the commenter claims he wasn't referring to rape, then I'll put that aside. That wasn't even my point...my point was that it's petty to wish cruel and unusual punishment upon a human being. I think the book should be thrown at her, of course, five years is a joke. But being beaten and tortured? Really?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:42 PM
0

Putting aside all of that is it really any better that you wish she would become beaten, become "property to be owned"?? Stop arguing over the tiny details, when the entire premise is cruel. An eye for an eye makes everyone blind. We're better than this.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:38 PM
-3

I would argue against that, but that still doesn't make wishing it upon her any fucking better.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:36 PM
-5

I hope female prisoners are like male prisoners in the sense that male prisoners would make someones life a truly living hell, possibly even murder them, for hurting a child like that. You referred to the practice of male prisoners treating male perpetrators of rape badly. Whenever somebody says "you know what they do to rapists in prison?" they are talking about rape.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:23 PM
-2

I'd say they're both equally terrible... But five years is a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:08 PM
6

Google "Female Genital Mutilation".
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:07 PM
-9

No. Two wrongs do not make a right. This is a disappointing comment to read. I said in an earlier comment that I have no sympathy for her and think she deserves at least fifteen years, but rape is cruel and unusual punishment. We do not condone prison rape when it's done to men. So we shouldn't when it's done to women either. For the love of Christ, we are fucking better than this petty SJW-esque bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:06 PM
3

This article highlights what we want to see: women being equally punished for crimes. Are you kidding? Five years is nothing. "Imagine if a man did this to a girl" title doesn't evoke a particularly contrasting image in this case, unless you mean a man cutting a girl would be killed or something. Yes it does...have you never heard of female genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:03 PM
4

This is one of those things that make me feel disgusted. I don't believe in the death penalty or anything, but I have no sypathy for her. She deserves at least fifteen years...more like twenty.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:00 PM
2

I would cause such a PR shitstorm for that goddamn bar and it's piece of shit bartender. I would raise charges against that woman and man for fucking assault. Lowlife scum. I need to just not comment here tonight. This one really set me off, guys.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 10:22 PM
8

Dude, try flipping the sexes around in your story...this is literally what angry feminists and SJWs say most of the time. They let their anger and their emotions color their beliefs and they believe that all men should punished for the actions of a disturbed few. This woman has done nothing wrong, so far as we know. I'm really sorry that you've been through this shit. I know nothing I can say will make it better or even change your mind, but just know that people do care about you. It's not an e…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:06 PM
6

This is exactly the point of logic that SJWs operate from. They believe that patriarchy gives men a systematic advantage so that whenever the game happens to be rigged in the woman's forever it's okay because it's balancing the scales a bit. This attitude IS NOT okay and it's not what we do. We are better than this. Also, you have no idea what benefits she has accepted. For all we fucking know, she could be an MRA. Do not conflate all women with feminism. They aren't the same thing. Hell, whenev…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:01 PM
4

Yep, people assume that if you're in prison you must have done something terrible and have no chance of being wrongly convicted, so even if you're raped and murdered in prison, you had to have deserved it. It seems like nobody gives a shit about prisoners. Even the guilty ones deserved to be treated like human beings. And vindictively punishing someone instead of trying to rehabilitate helps absolutely no one. It reflects on our attitudes toward mental health as well.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:25 PM
5

Jesus, do people really not realize that when you take a substance anally, it is immensely more potent? Fuck, people have died from taking coffee rectally. It's not something to mess around with. This is why it's such a problem that the sex toy industry isn't FDA regulated. Many manufacturers can and do get away with using unsafe materials in their sex toys. It's gotten to the point where people in sex and kink communities create and maintain lists of confirmed safe manufacturers.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:52 PM
2

You also have to consider the innocents wrongly convicted. How many men go to prison because their one night stand regretted the sex they had, the next morning and decided she was raped. It's common practice for allege rapists to be raped in prison. Even if they're guilty, two wrongs don't make a right. It's more likely to nurture the abusive behaviors that the rapist already had. Violence and hate breeds violence and hate. Some of these abusers are so abusive because they themselves were abused…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:48 PM
15

Just out of curiosity, why are you letting it slide?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:17 AM
15

Can we get some context for this? It's really confusing.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:25 PM
2

Is anyone claiming that it says anything about feminism??
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:08 PM
3

Wait, Target was exploiting him?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:08 PM
2

ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:02 AM
6

Or, rather, shelters for men.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:06 PM
3

For the love of Christ, Women =!= Feminists Men =!= MRAs It is fucking batshit insane that this needs to be said.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:41 AM
3

I mean, these people are adults right? Why do other people need to be responsible for where grown adults choose to get wasted? I wouldn't drink something incapacitating if I was in an unfamiliar or unsafe location.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:47 AM
15

I just discovered her the other day, during GamerGate. So far, she is the only feminist that I truly respect. People like her need to step up and reclaim their movement. Her support of GamerGate only makes her more admirable. If you tweet to her about her loss, please don't include the #GamerGate or #NotYourShield hastag. No need to co-opt her loss as a PR stunt. GG is doing fine right now. Thanks to wonderful people like her.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:47 PM
9

Man =!= MRA Woman =!= Feminist
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:18 AM
1

If he had called the cops on me I don't know what the penalty would have been In most cases of female on male domestic abuse, when the cops are called, they take the man away, even though he was the victim. It's literally policy to arrest the man no matter what, in some states. But your post has reaffirmed my faith in humanity today. Most women would have realized they had been abusive, but would have pushed it to the back of their mind and pretend like they did nothing wrong. You're a good pers…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:11 AM
1

I totally get the wanting to be alone thing. Most of the time, when I'm depressed I just want my gf to hold me. But every once in a while, I have one of those days when I just don't want to see anybody.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:03 AM
8

The cops who arrested you should lose their jobs and never get them back.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:02 AM
1

It's not as bad as SRS, but it's still a well-known feminist space.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:00 AM
2

The worst part about it is that it was recently just added to the default subs list.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 05:59 AM
8

It's not her speech that people have a problem with. It's the organization she's promoting, HeForShe. Why do people keep thinking this is about the speech??
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:20 AM
1

Probably the most depressing thing about GamerGate was that I loved Depression Quest. The game is incredibly important to breaking the stigma of depression and it really touched me when I played it. After seeing it's creator be outed as a such a nepotistic greedy, abusive, controlling, charity thief really upset me. I actually felt kind of exploited for my depression. I mean, I voted for this game on Steam Greenlight and downloaded it as soon as it appeared on Steam. And now I can't even recomme…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:18 AM
1

Yeah, but this was over two years ago. I don't even recall the title of the thread.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:57 PM
1

Thanks. Sometimes it's just nice to be validated.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:52 AM
1

No, it's perfectly fine to ask questions here. I'm sorry if my question seemed rude. Some of us are a little gun shy. We've often tried to be civil with feminists and ask or answer questions, but for whatever reason a rational behavior did not prevail. As for Brian, it's a bit late for that. Unless he posts again, there's nothing to be done.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:50 AM
1

I looked up to him as a kid :( This is almost kind of heart breaking. To learn that somebody you looked up to or who has touched you really doesn't give a shit about your demographic or fighting for your rights.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:06 PM
5

Yep. As soon as I learned that a lot of medical organizations don't push the whol circumcision being genital mutilation thing is because so many hospitals sell the foreskin to lotion manufacturers I just gave up all faith in humanity. We mutilate the genitals of baby boys wholesale and then put them in cosmetics and beauty accessories. And people complain that men are always trying to possess women's bodies.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:09 PM
5

Well, I was circumcised and it never bothered me until I realized that it is indeed genital mutilation. After learning that the foreskin has a lot of nerve endings and the removing it decreases sensitivity, I feel really cheated. I didn't get a choice in the matter and something was removed from my body before I could even speak. In my mind, there is no difference between male and female genital mutilation except the male genital mutilation is horribly ignored. People complain all of the time th…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:07 PM
0

Probably because it's more of a circle jerk type sub than a subreddit aimed at helping men's issues or giving support to people who have suffered under feminism or an unbalanced society. I have never been to /r/pussypass, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it's exactly a center for men's rights more than it is a place for rants.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:33 AM
2

Sounds like you're an egalitarian. But you can be both a feminist and an MRA. There are crazies on both sides but there are good people out there on both sides (even when the internet makes you feel like there aren't). By the way, you mentioned the wage gap, thing. Men and women do get paid the same for the same job.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:18 AM
1

This is a valid argument, sadly :( I was all for it till I read this.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:14 AM
1

To what are you referring? What happened with Wil?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:13 AM
1

That was a fun test. Shows how much I've changed over the years, though for some reason the economic line was too far to the right for my comfort zone. However I did score as a social Libertarian which was what I was going for. I honestly thought all of my corporate hate would land me an economically left position.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:12 AM
1

I'd hate to see how you'd react to an actual criminal. Drop a nuke on him?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:43 AM
1

Probably before his time being a subscriber of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:42 AM
1

If you're "the opposite of an MRA", then why are you interested in this? Do you have some kind of vested interest in this Brian person? And, I don't mean to discourage you from trying to see our viewpoint, but if you're the opposite of an MRA (which I presume to mean that you're against the MRM) then why are you here in the first place? To answer you question, there's really no way to know. Sometimes posts just don't take off. I think we've all submitted something really interesting to Reddit, w…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:41 AM
15

This is a very valid point. Though it is still disheartening that anyone like that. The stats would likely have been more comforting if done on a sight with a negative feedback button.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:34 AM
1

Because if you're mentally ill, you can't be totally blamed for your actions. Killing this person wouldn't bring back the people he killed. Why kill somebody when you can treat their illness? Also, not in regards to this case, but the chance of innocent conviction is too high for the death penalty to be something we do.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:09 PM
4

This is the most ignorant thing I've read all day. The boy was sick. He needed psychiatric attention, not the fucking death penalty. Not like it fucking matters, now. He wasn't given the medical help he needed and instead imprisoned, which had no chance of rehabilitating him. So he killed himself. He did the job for you, you mindless prick.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:11 AM
1

This isn't some quick crime of passion. This is psychotic horrific behavior. Which just goes to show he needed medical attention, not jail time. He should have been interred into a mental facility. Crimes of passion usually have actual motivation behind them. You're pretty damned backwards to think that somebody exhibiting psychotic behavior should be executed when somebody who actually commits premeditated murder for a legitimate motivation should get the lesser sentence. Neither should face th…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:09 AM
8

These people take everything humans have ever discovered about philosophy, ethics, and justice and shit all over it.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:26 PM
2

Wait. So LBGT marriages aren't real now?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:23 AM
4

But, just because she claims something that isn't true, doesn't mean it is. Don't get me wrong, her speech is great! It's a wonderfully refreshing monologue that was no doubt very well intentioned. But the organization is not on the same page she is.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:13 AM
17

Why do so many people think the definition of equality is "advantage for women". This is literally the opposite of equality.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:38 PM
2

That alone isn't a red flag. But /r/creepyPMs is a notorious feminist subreddit. Edit: And I don't want to walk the line of accusing somebody of being a criminal because they wear a trench coat, but all of the things add up to a potential concern trolling (a term I really dislike because it is thrown around quite often here), but it seems that the simple that these child grooms aren't even known about is enough to make this is as much of a problem as child brides. They're both equally terrible p…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:31 AM
4

I missed "From the comments:" in your comment and was about to have a stroke. In another thread there was some pretty obvious comment brigading and yours about had me fuming. Glad I didn't fly off the handle without rereading your comment. I get so depressed when I come to this subreddit, sometimes.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:31 AM
2

Something is fishy in this thread. Your comment should not be downvoted. And the poster of the parent comment doesn't have much of a comment history except for a couple of comments at /r/creepyPMs...
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:26 AM
2

Yeah, but it's not exclusively a religious-driven practice anymore. People allow their babies to be circumcised "just-because" and because hospitals spread misinformation about the alleged "benefits" and the drawbacks. They make money off selling them to lotion manufacturers. It's more corporate and tradition driven (at least in the US) than it is driven by religion.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:18 AM
5

Chopping something off an innocent child that won't grow back simply for cosmetic purposes is incredibly sick when you think about. This is literally no different that female genital mutilation done in third world countries, except that here it is done by doctors in clinical settings. There is no medical purpose for circumcision despite how many people claim that it prevents infection (it doesn't). It has, however, been shown to cause a bit of desensitization in the penis. And all of this isn't …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:15 AM
2

What? I don't even know how to reply to this statement. I have a friend who had his arm amputated and he ended up being the owner of a couple of businesses. Maybe amputation of a person's arm should be a standardized practice for newborns since the amputation and this person's success are obviously directly related.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:04 AM
4

Yes because circumcision is a hugely invasive surgical procedure that exists solely to remove sexual pleasure. Actually, that is exactly the reasoning behind it. It may not be anymore, but that's absolutely what started it.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:02 AM
2

Where did he refer to legality?? He's speaking of morality, though it should be in violation of both.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:00 AM
3

Well, it's more than just religion being the problem. Almost all boys born in America are circumcised and I'd hazard a guess that not even half of them are circumcised for religious reasons. It's just done because it's the in-thing to chop skin off of baby penises.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:59 AM
7

The law needs to go further than that. Nobody should be allowed to perform a circumcision on babies unless there is a medical emergency requiring it. I still burn with rage some days thinking how a part of my body was just lopped off when I was born without my consent. They don't fucking grow back, for Christ's sake. It's so fucking sick and twisted.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:57 AM
-1

Well there is the difference between forceful rape and maybe something like emotional rape or rape committed because the victim is too afraid of angering the rapist by saying no. Then there are things like statutory rape.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:52 PM
9

And the sad fact is, that apparently a large number rape victims do feel aroused during their rape. That's what makes rape so traumatizing. It's a mixture of fear and the shame of the thought that a small part of you wanted it. I imagine the thought of that makes you feel like it may have been your fault or that you're disgusting for feeling that way. Add all of that to the fact that being raped is indeed a horrible feeling in and of itself, and it leaves you with some scars that will last a lif…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:50 PM
2

That's the joke
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:25 PM
2

So I guess we shouldn't give condoms to teenagers then? The drug war is about as effective as abstinence only education. Also, that isn't a fallacy.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:08 PM
1

I would explain to you why you're wrong, but it's easier to call you an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:07 PM
2

I don't think it's a good road to start on to automatically assume that she's too close-minded to change her mind.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:12 PM
2

It really is a problem...right now there are two posts on the front of this sub that link TDM. If we want people to take us seriously then we need to stop circulating shitty tabloids that aren't the friend of the MRM (no matter how many people here seem to think that they are).
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:08 PM
4

Because The Daily Mail is a cheap tabloid.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:07 PM
0

STOP linking to The goddamned Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:06 PM
1

STOP linking to The goddamned Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:05 PM
20

There were some comments there trying to slightly defend the abuser, but it looked like most of them were positive regarding the decision to call the police.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:05 PM
2

I think most of us can testify to how often the wage gap myth is propagated. I eventually bookmarked the Slate study that invalidates that argument because so many feminists on Reddit always bring it up no matter how many times it's mentioned that it's false.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:27 PM
1

Are the statute of limitations up?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:47 PM
2

But they won't.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:46 PM
4

That statistic is bullshit. It's been shown to decrease sensitivity as well as having negligible benefits. It's something that is done on baby boys who cannot consent. It absolutely is an issue and the fact that the entire western world doesn't seem to care is appalling.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:49 AM
2

One day, mysteriously, the whole of SRS is shadowbanned That'll likely never happen so long as one of them is an admin. It's why they're allowed to brigade.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:17 PM
33

I know you're joking, but I understand. I care about the MRM a lot and so many of the posts here are important to share and make public, but damn if this sub doesn't have some of the most incredibly depressing content out of any other sub I visit. I often don't come here because I am depressed enough. It's just horribly heartbreaking to see so many people, even people I have looked up to in my life (Wil Wheaton) who legitimately don't care about Men's Rights and really aren't interested in equal…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:52 PM
-11

No, they aren't.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:49 PM
23

Feminists are getting into power. Women aren't the problem. When you speak about women this way it makes us sound really fucking ignorant and genuinely misogynistic. Do not conflate being a woman with being a feminist. They are absolutely not the same things, as I am sure the many female subscribers of this subreddit can testify to.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:59 PM
4

I was really disappointed. I voted for Depression Quest on Steam and loved the game. I followed her on Twitter before I knew she was an SJW. When this first came out a few days ago, I initially defended her slightly, but only because it's so damn difficult to see where something like this started when you walk into it during the middle of it. Within a day, I had been convinced that she was guilty as accused. It's so sad. Her game is a wonderful tool to make the non-depressed to understand what d…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:57 PM
1

Here you are
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:45 PM
1

This is true. And I'm sorry for that. I didn't know where else to post this. It seems like all other subs are to heavily moderated for anti-SRS or anti-SJW content to be discussed. I just wanted to see if we could discover the facts. Feel free to delete this if you need to. But I implore you to let it stand a while. If something gets out of hand, don't hesistate to do what you need to. But there aren't many open forums on Reddit when it comes to discussing SRS.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:43 PM
1

As, the OP, I back up /u/nicemod/. Let's discuss what's going on, figure out why this happened, and see how SRS is (if it's really them) is treated. If you go to this subreddit and make any posts, comments, or votes, you might be shadowbanned and the only ones who would suffer would be your accounts and possibly this subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:40 PM
9

I remember that post. It was disgusting how many people just read past the "accused of" part and said he deserved it.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:41 AM
1

I know who Phoebe is. I was just being facetious.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:22 PM
1

I get really depressed when I think about so many baby boys being mutilated in hospitals every day and nobody thinks twice about it. I didn't get a choice in circumcision and it was a permanent decision. I'll make damn sure that never happens to any children I have. And it makes me livid to think about how men are forced to sign up for selective service while women are not. Edit: And now I'm even more depressed because somebody thought this comment was downvote worthy. It's disgusting that peopl…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:20 AM
1

Who the hell is Fibi?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:13 AM
17

You're wrong. Masturbation is an affront against women.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:38 PM
2

It's ridiculous how an abused spouse can be regarded as the abuser just because he is the man. He was not only a victim of his abusive wife, but the justice system. As well as you are. You were abused by your mother and prevented from seeing your father which included a way out of your abusive living situation. Congratulations, family court system, your biased sexism has ruined a man and his child's life. However, I am glad to hear that at least you and your father found a happy ending to this t…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:17 PM
2

Did she really go his crotch? I watched the video, but I'm on satellite internet so it's sort of grainy. It looked like she just grabbed his leg but maybe I couldn't see clearly.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:28 PM
1

What did the stranger say?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:43 PM
1

I definitely see where you're coming from. But I'm just afraid it might be too much of a slippery slope. But, then, I don't know very much about military environments.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:56 AM
6

You're absolutely right. I'm just afraid that will never happen.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:36 AM
6

I totally agree. The problem is proving that it was done intentionally to get sent home and not by accident. And it's not like they can take steps to prevent pregnancies other than handing out free birth control.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:52 AM
28

and getting pregnant to get out of deployments. Now, that is some bullshit. I don't know how you could properly enforce it so this wouldn't happen, though. I mean, it almost seems like birth control would need to be required for women in the army (unless there is a legitimate medical condition that prevents them from it). But maybe that's too far and is unethical. This is a difficult one. It is too damn easy to get pregnant and then claim it was an accident. It sounds easier than shooting yourse…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:32 AM
79

Women volunteer anyway. Sorry, but you can't use rape as an excuse for anything. Women absolutely should have to sign up for the SS. It's frankly disgusting that in this day and age in a first world country that only men are forced to sign up for Selective Service. It's so incredibly sexist.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:12 AM
12

The MRM is compatible with egalitarianism, but feminism is not. At least, not without an overhaul of its central theory... but then would that still be "feminism"? Just to clarify that modern-day feminism is not compatible with egalitarianism. Second wave feminism definitely was. And all the young kids who claim they're feminists without being aware of the direction the movement is headed, in general, are usually more similar to second wave feminists than the third wave we see today. As someone …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:09 AM
28

They absolutely should. I wish they could. But every attempt that this subreddit has made to reach out to any of the feminist subs has been met with less than friendly or rational responses. Hell, most of the feminist subreddits (at least the big ones) are so hostile toward the MRM in general that it's impossible to have any kind of civil discussion. And subreddits like SRS aren't even worth the effort, anymore. I mean, most of us here acknowledge that women are still discriminated against (thou…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:53 AM
96

The feminist subs are really ban-happy. Apparently they expect everyone to strictly only speak of approved opinions, topics, or facts and lies. I was banned from /r/creepyPMs for making a joke.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:50 AM
5

Ohh, I get it. I'm not persecuted I'm just an asshole. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:17 AM
7

Looking that comment history of the OP of that post shows that he/she is a severely biased feminist extremist. When the people in the comments started to doubt the study, OP reacted with petty personal attacks and claiming he/she was being persecuted.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:46 AM
1

Daily Mail runs feminist articles all the time. Just last year, they had an article of how the teacher who raped her 14 year old student was the real victim. TDM is not at all interested in furthering Men's Rights. They are indeed a tabloid and long have been. Ask any Redditor in the UK, they specialize in celebrity gossip and low-brow content. I care a lot of the MRM and this subreddit. It looks badly upon all of us when TDM and other unreputable sources make it to the front page of this sub.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:06 AM
1

Regardless of the content in this link, please, please stop linking to the Daily Mail. All other subs have mostly gotten past this, but for some reason some of the people here have failed to realize that The Daily Mail is a tabloid. You make this entire subreddit look bad when you link to them.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:06 AM
8

Cut the sexist bullshit. This sentence is no different than when feminists say that you can't tell the difference between a good man and a rapist.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:54 AM
6

Please say feminists, NOT women. We are not a woman-bashing sub.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:52 AM
1

Because then people would harass him/her. I do not care how much of an ass someone is nor matter how much they do the same to others, they don't deserve to be harassed. It's not difficult to track down someone's digital footprint to their Facebook page. It's a common courtesy everyone on the internet should afford to even their worst enemies.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:59 AM
2

I don't get what you're saying. I didn't say they weren't. The screenshot in question is from a post about a woman creep.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:50 PM
2

I didn't expect to be banned for a joke, especially considering that I tried to play nice and edited my comment.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:35 AM
2

No, I was banned for making a joke. I edited my post when I found out the swear word was against the rules. I left an Edit note with a tongue-in-cheek statement about totalitarian vulgarity rules. One mod thought it was funny then pointed me to the rules. Another mod decided that jokes aren't allowed and banned me for making the joke. When I was banned I had already edited my swear word. I wasn't mocking them. It's like nobody has a sense of humor. Jesus.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:19 AM
4

The insult wasn't directed a man, though. It was directed at a woman who tracked down a Redditor to his Facebook, posted on his wall telling him to becareful, and tagged his mother in the post, saying she wouldn't like it if she knew he smoked pot. I referred to her as a bitch because she didn't seem to give a shit about who she hurt. She was a bitch because she was a terrible person, not because she had a vagina. If it had been a guy, I probably would have called him a dick or a cunt. But anywa…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:20 AM
26

Yeah, I had no idea until now. It's ridiculous how all these subs are turning into feminist propaganda stations. It'll probably only get worse now that /r/twoxchromosomes has been defaulted. That isn't to say that all feminists are like these crazies, but it seems like most of the ones on Reddit are fairly extreme. At least the ones that I've encountered.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:15 AM
7

Ah, thanks. I don't really care about Karma in the terms of points. But it's kind of a big deal when people downvote you for inappropriate reasons or because they don't like hearing the truth. Downvoting someone's comment essentially censors them by hiding their content. In regards to this post...I just find it hilarious that I made a joke about the sub being totalitarian (really, I meant it, but it was made tongue-in-cheek) and was subsequently banned for making a joke. NOT for breaking the rul…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:28 AM
18

I called the person in question a bitch. Because she tracked down a Redditor's Facebook page, then posted to his timeline saying that he should be careful on the internet and that his mom would probably not approve him smoking pot. She's a bitch, not because she's a woman, but because she's a really shitty person. I could have called her a dick, but women aren't usually called dicks. The mod made it a gendered insult. If a person is a bitch, a dick, a prick, an asshole, a cunt, a twat, anything.…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:16 AM
1

Women can't rape, shitlord. They just teach young boys the things they want to know. /s because I know somebody will be deaf to my sarcasm.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:11 AM
3

How would this be different than our conceptualized financial abortion theory? This feels like a really confusing conundrum.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:10 AM
2

It's also inaccurate. In my state, the age of consent is 17.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:08 AM
4

For what? This isn't even a petition against government overreach. This is the White House.gov's petition system. Nobody's going to kill you for condemning rape.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:08 AM
2

I mean, some people who haven't had a lot of experience might be too frightened to say no or confused as to what they are expected to do. Of course this is a gray area and this does not alone prove guilt, but it isn't unthinkable that someone could have not wanted to consent, but did so anyway. In cases like this, I just feel bad for everyone involved. You can't arrest someone when they didn't technically rape a person, because they didn't necessarily do anything wrong even if you can extrapolat…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:05 PM
7

No, they literally did not. They figuratively shot themselves in the foot. This is happening too often.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:01 PM
2

That is so disgusting. FtM are men born with a disorder. Their body doesn't have the right parts. It's sad that those surgeries aren't covered by a lot of insurance plans in the US. This is one of the most significant disorders that a person can be born with. Anyway, fwiw, I thought the title was referring to a mtf transsexual because it seemed likely the feminists would kick an mtf out because they believe her to be a male who had just had surgery, since a lot of feminists believe that gender i…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:43 AM
3

they see trans men as women who attack all women everywhere by rejecting womanhood That is horribly sexist. Trans men don't have any womanhood to reject. It's a little telling to see a group who claims to be progressive and liberal to tell certain people that they aren't really who they are.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:18 AM
3

Take your bigotry elsewhere. It isn't wanted here.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:58 AM
1

Wait was he actually a man? Or was she a transwoman? The title is extremely confusing. If she was a woman and was kicked out because the feminists thought she was a man, I could make sense of this. But the title seems to imply that the person was a female to male transsexual and was kicked out for being a man. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:58 AM
3

You know that it's not as simple as that. Stop being facetious.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:56 AM
1

Wait, how was he kicked out for being a man if he was F2M? If the person was actually a she, then the title has made a pretty egregious error.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:55 AM
9

I've been subbed to this subreddit for almost two years and I have even submitted links here. I'm also a victim of a false accusation from a crazy ex girlfriend. But yeah, I'm a brigader. You got me. My comment was so outrageously anti-men to suggest that both boys and girls should be taught to respect the boundaries and sexual comfort of others at a young age. (I'll just cover my ass and leave an /s here. Reddit sucks at sarcasm.) This is a serious problem with this subreddit. I know that we le…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:42 AM
28

Which is crazy, because a long, long time ago, society used to shame women for showing any signs of sexuality. Women were supposed to be passionless and if they ever wanted sex, it meant they had Female Hysteria. They were just supposed to grind through their wifely duty. Now, men are shamed for just being men. It's a bit like how society encourages the whole White Guilt thing. I have never been racist to anyone and I defend every ethnicity and their rights as humans. Just like how I have never …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:23 AM
19

Because if boys get beaten up or raped they can just grow a pair.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:12 AM
12

/u/ms_kittyfantastico isn't making it something casual. Believe it or not, kids are stupid and oblivious. It doesn't hurt anyone to tell all students that rape is bad as long as they aren't villifying one sex over the other. And I think that men, especially, need to learn self-defense. Bot sexes absolutely can benefit from that.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:06 AM
8

Boys shouldn't worry about getting raped because they can always just grow a pair and man up afterwards. It's an automatic get-out-of-hardship-free card. Edit: Jesus you guys suck at reading sarcasm. Fuck.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:04 AM
8

This infuriates me so much. Feminists and right winged conservatives just love to demonize sex. It is an integral part of our species. It's probably something we should try to be okay with one day or we could...y'know, die off.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:41 PM
1

Don't you get it? Only men can cyber-rape. /s (hope that wasn't needed, but Reddit has disappointed me lately)
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:39 PM
0

Keep up. You accused me of being called out as a "concern troll" in another thread. That thread in question is where a commenter replied to a comment that said "people are evil" (paraphrase), with "people women are evil". He kind of clarified his point farther down in the thread, but didn't edit his main comment. The argument ensued and thus I was termed a "concern troll", because I don't want the MRM conflated with what originally sounded like misogyny. you're saying ignore it because it's the …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:42 PM
1

Telling someone not to bash women because that is not what the MRM is about does not make someone a feminist troll. Just because people on reddit like to have an excuse to disregard anyone else's argument with novel terms like "concern troll" does not make my point moot. This is really upsetting to me. I'm not even angry anymore. I am absolutely not a feminist and being called one frustrates and confuses me. Is Reddit so disconnected from their understanding of debate and fallacy to arbitrarily …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:20 PM
1

Yeah, let's not resort to that.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:07 PM
1

Have you read any of these comments? The source is the study. TDM isn't the source. We are asking that people stop linking to TDM because they practice shoddy journalism and just regurgitate unoriginal news items under their own biased rhetoric. Linking to them just gives them ad revenue for each click. They DON'T DESERVE IT.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:07 PM
1

This was exactly my point, as well.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:04 PM
6

And yet, I've even encountered redditors on this sub who didn't think that circumcision is a big deal. It's mindboggling that this goes on in hospitals every day by doctors. It is socially acceptable genital mutilation. It really makes sick thinking about how many people just don't care that this goes on every day in what is supposed to be a first world country.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:03 PM
2

Not at all surprising.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:00 PM
2

Kills me that you were downvoted. They absolutely should not be posted here, even if this study isn't theirs and is accurate. It makes us look bad and it gives them money.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:55 PM
2

I am floored by some of the responses to your comment. They're probably from the US. I didn't know about TDM until after a few articles and I noticed that something was fishy. Did some research and then a few UK redditor's educated me on them. I know it's a UK tabloid, but Reddit really needs to get past the daily mail thing. They aren't worth our clicks and they really shouldn't even be getting this much attention on Reddit of all places, but people like this ignore all evidence and just endles…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:53 PM
-2

These are just suggestions so you can avoid embarrassing yourself again. Your superiority complex is making you look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:01 PM
3

Are you kidding? The study may be accurate, but the Daily Mail is the opposite of being in the interests of men's rights. I thought we'd gotten over this. They are a tabloid.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:58 AM
2

It's not against the rules to link to TDM. It's just a shitty thing to do. This isn't censorship. Most of their articles relating to sexism are feminist in nature. Their have poor ethics and don't give a shit about actually reporting facts. The idea that you defend them makes me question whether you're posting here out of legitimate concern or if you're a troll from SRS. However, it really actually just bums me out that anyone on this sub would defend them. They sure as Hell won't defend you.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:57 AM
0

I did read your post. Your "clarifications" weren't in it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:52 AM
2

It kills me how people repeatedly defend TDM. They are not interested in mens rights in the slightest. Far too many times have I seen some shitty, unreputable feminist propaganda and other inane bullshit grace their pages. They are a tabloid and they are not worth our clicks. We're just rewarding shitty, pandering journalism when we post TDM links. I'm so tired of seeing them on Reddit.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:51 AM
2

If you're criticising something for the source Seriously, dude?? The reason you need to criticize the Daily Mail is because of the absolute garbage they've published before. That's sort of how it gets to the point where you criticize it for the source. Because the source is NOT reliable. I suppose you'd trust Fox News and CNN, as well. When links from TDM are posted, it just gives them more money and teaches them that unethical and shitty journalism is wanted.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:48 AM
1

No, he's not. The Daily Mail is a well known tabloid that is notoriously unreliable. When you link to TDM you are just giving them money for their unethical and shittily written journalism. I can't believe you are actually defending TDM. This is the same news source that treated female on teen male rape as if it were just silly puppy love. Do not trust TDM and for God's sake don't commend them for whatever balls you imagine they have.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:45 AM
2

PLEASE PLEASE stop linking the Daily Mail. We've been over this a hundred times. They are a tabloid. You are just giving them money.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:42 AM
-5

Maybe you should edit your post. It's impossible to see what you've said below before you get there. I do not appreciate being called a troll, especially when I am just trying to help protect our image. I'm tired of having to defend the MRM from people who don't understand it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:09 AM
-5

Take this bullshit elsewhere. That statement DID not need to be altered and you are being just as much of a sexist pig as the feminists are by saying this. I'm sorry, but I've been accused of being a misogynist for being an MRA to put up with this garbage. THIS IS NOT WHAT THIS MOVEMENT IS ABOUT. We do not bash or hate on women. We fight for their equality as much as we do for ours. Sincerely, Fuck off
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:31 AM
3

I'm sorry, but if you can't believe that some people would lie about something so easy to lie about as rape, then you must also believe that nobody really wants to murder other people and that Santa Claus is real. It's just so mindblowingly naive. Believe it or not, there are worse things you can lie about than rape and people do. It's just so childish to not see this. The world is not a happy place. I'm sorry, but people can be total shit sometimes.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:28 AM
1

This comment caused me to unfollow him from Twitter. It's really depressing. I looked up to him as a kid, while watching TNG. Star Trek was a show where equality was actually real and everyone stood up for the rights of each other. To learn that he is so closed minded to not see that men are discriminated against was a blow to me. So fucking disappointed. :(
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:13 AM
2

And nobody disagrees with that.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 11:37 PM
1

Never mind, you've gone completely off the rails now. I agreed with your original premise that a student making sexual suggestions to a teacher is inappropriate behavior and should be punished. But if you think the student is the aggressor here, then you're totally off your rocker.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:16 PM
4

Eh, I was with you up till this. This is victim blaming.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:14 PM
2

He's not blaming the student for her raping him. He's just saying that a student who makes sexual advances on a teacher should be punished domestically whether the student is male or female.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:13 PM
7

I agree. She shouldn't have been arrested at all. Maybe fired because it is unprofessional to have sex with a student, but she didn't do anything wrong and it wasn't rape. I do agree with others here, however, who say that if this had been a male coach, he would be receiving death threats.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:41 PM
2

Then why is she serving any jail time? It wasn't rape. She shouldn't have been arrested at all. Dismissed from her position maybe, but not jail time.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:39 PM
2

Thank you for voicing your opinion and standing up for mens rights. It's so refreshing to me to see women caring about this movement. Not to say that all women are feminists or anything, but it's just something I've never seen in any women I know in real life.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:29 PM
3

You know what? My parents were divorced. I spent equal time with each of them, on alternating weeks. And both of them had to do ALL of the important things when I was with them. Nickelodeon can GO FUCK THEMSELVES. It really disappoints me to see them do this kind of shit when they meant so much to me, as a kid.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:15 AM
1

I am by no means a woman, so I won't claim to have any authority to speak on this. But it's been my experience with partners that every girl is different. With my first gf, there was no way to know if she was having her period. It bothered her that little. Another girl I dated turned into Satan himself (though she was a psycho-bitch anyway, who liked to spread false rape claims) on her period. My current girlfriend (who is a saint) doesn't fall to pieces, but she will ocassionally have a day whe…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:12 AM
2

Single dads never get the attention that they deserve. I smile when I see people use the term Single Parent, but more often than not, it's just Single Mom. :(
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:05 AM
3

Yeah, you're not supposed to see your children, anyway. Just make sure you become a slave to your job so you can keep up those child support payments!
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:05 AM
3

Oh people would throw a fit if it was flipped around. And they should. But this is just as goddamn offensive as that.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:04 AM
1

I'm having difficulty understanding your comment... Your father is going to become your brother? /serious
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:01 AM
11

Things are bad enough with parents being divorced these days. We don't need outside influences telling people that it should be a competition for the child's love. My parents have been divorced since I was 2 and, though I didn't know it, they hid their jealousies and their problems from me and made sure that I got to spend equal time with each of them. Bullshit like this just PISSES me off, because it promotes a toxic environment in families, which can be argued is a negligent or even abusive th…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:00 AM
0

After thinking about it I've come to the conclusion that this has to be a joke. No organization like Nick would do this. It's a PR disaster. It's still a PR disaster. The satire is not evident enough. It's hard to tell that it is a joke and adding that it's Father's Day makes it even worse. This joke is in very poor taste, in my opinion, and a monstrously stupid decision to make for a company that is supposed to be promoting families.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:57 AM
4

You seem like one angry dad.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:18 AM
15

God tell me about this. I am never allowed to not be in the mood. It doesn't really work the other way around. There is a lesson that society teaches men and women and it's that men are always in the mood. Always. They will always be up for sex. If they say no, then that means there is something wrong with them or your not sexy enough. Ya know, sometimes guys just aren't in the mood.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:56 PM
1

It seems like everytime you comment in a thread here it's something along the lines of "Not a mens rights issue!!"
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:24 AM
4

Thank you so so much. You are awesome. I realize the oddity of being thanked for standing up for equality, but unfortunately not many do.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:52 AM
1

Thank you. That's so nice. Not enough people offer to help people who suffer from depression. I appreciate your kind words. And I'm sorry about your ex. I guess everybody has had relations with "crazy" from time to time. I blame myself for my situation, a bit, as I knew better than to date her. I was just lonely and desperate at the time, I guess, and I did develop genuine feelings. Fortunately, I've never been cheated on. I'm sorry that you went through that. I'm sure he felt the need to lie to…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:40 AM
1

Ah, well forgive me for assuming you were a dirty console peasant. :) I admit I haven't played much Garry's Mod, though I have messed around with Traitor in Terrorist Town a bit. The only shooters I usually play are Counter-Strike GO and Left 4 Dead 2. I'm mainly an RPG, strategy (I'm addicted to Civilization) gamer. I'm sorry that you've had negative experiences with the gaming community. I have noticed a difference between the chats of shooters compared to, say Civ V and the couple of MMOs tha…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:37 AM
51

If this had been a man attacking a sixteen year old girl, he would have been beat to death by bystanders or by the police.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:10 AM
7

I really struggle with depression, and the treatment of men in the culture's eye is not the least of which a contributer. It's always so damn refreshing when a woman supports mens rights. Even if you never even defend mens rights around other women (which would be appreciated. Women are more likely to listen to other women about mens rights, sad to say), thank you for coming here and taking our problems seriously. It means a lot. I cannot convey to you how much it means. Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:09 AM
2

As someone who deals with a lot of depression for many reasons, not the least of which, is some of the discrimination men face, just thank you. It's always so refreshing to see a woman holding these opinions who is actually interested in this cause. I lost a lot of friends three years ago because my crazy ex told our coworkers that I forced her "to get on her knees". Nobody even asked me for my side of the story, despite that face that most everyone that knows her knew that she was a horrible pe…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:00 AM
1

In my experience, like YouTube comments, the console gaming scene is a cesspool of just general hatred. Racism, sexism, etc. abounds in those places. PC gaming communities are usually much more civil. The users are generally more mature.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:47 AM
2

I did. A quick Google search will confirm it from multiple sources, but since you're lazy: Here it is again.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:10 AM
7

You won't believe it, but they sell it to facecream manufacturers. That's right. Baby boys have portions of their genitals forcibly removed and then sold to companies to sell cosmetic cream to insecure soccer moms. In a so-called civilized society. Oh and the parents have no right to make that decision unless the circumcision is medically necessary. It's not their foreskin that is being removed. A lot of parents claim that doctors have been over eager in getting them to schedule circumcisions. O…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:41 AM
5

Definitely blame the doctors. They often recommend that parents do it. Hospitals make money from selling foreskins, apparently.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:59 AM
1

Well, this has flung me into a deep pit of depression.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:48 PM
26

This bothers me a lot. There is nothing I can do to get that back. Part of me was just removed permanently for absolutely no reason without my consent. I didn't have a choice :( It makes me feel extremely violated.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:48 PM
6

Yes. You have to. It's against the law not to. Unless you have a vagina. You can't get a job or vote until you sign up. Unless you have a vagina.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:41 PM
2

Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:39 PM
2

Well, guess what, we haven't had a draft in forty years and we seem to have been doing just fine. Plenty of people signed up after 9/11 so they could fight an enemy who had absolutely nothing to do with the reason they signed up. Maybe part of that reason is because more women are signing up now than ever before.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:39 PM
7

I wish that people wouldn't react so negatively to male sex toys. "It's pathetic for a guy to use a flesh light". It literally is demonizing male sexuality. Women are free to buy any sex toy they want without being judged, but it's hard enough to even find as much of a variety of toys for men.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:31 PM
1

When I was banned from /r/republican, I was notified of it. It's likely the same for every sub.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:57 PM
3

This is so incredibly refreshing and spirit-lifting. Thank you.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:02 PM
39

Maybe this isn't as much of a wild conspiracy theory as it seems on the surface. It still really gets me that people think this. When people on the internet react to me mentioning men's rights, I am left with no other idea but to think they are just hateful and bigoted, but perhaps they're just ignorant of these problems. I still don't understand how that can be, though. All you have to do is look around and see that people think about men in a totally different way, from conscripted military se…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:34 AM
7

Well, this has fueled my depression. Shit like this just causes me to plummet and not even feel like anything is worth it anymore.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:15 AM
20

How does this not qualify as encouraging rape?? This case absolutely motivates other potential rapists in the education system to take advantage of the lax law enforcement regarding female-on-male rape. Sure as fuck sounds like a rape culture to me.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:49 PM
-3

This is refreshing. You should definitely wife that.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:58 AM
21

I think we're being brigaded again. Seeing some very offensive, non-/r/mensrights-y comments and such tonight.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:05 AM
10

Get a life and stop trolling.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:03 AM
4

I'm from the South and living in America. I'm not afraid to leave my state because I might be raped or killed for making ordinary small talk with a stranger.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:34 PM
0

I'm from the South and living in America. I'm not afraid to leave my state because I might be raped or killed for making ordinary small talk with a stranger.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:34 PM
1

I live in Alabama. If I ever went to LA, I'd be dead within a day because I was making small talk with who I thought was a friendly ordinary stranger.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:32 PM
15

If she were a man, there'd be an army of officials ready to force her into slave labor to make her financially responsible for others.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:03 PM
5

That's why I said Though this is a rumor and probably isn't true.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:13 PM
1

I think you're missing the point.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:00 PM
2

I do remember being fully aware of gender double standards as a kid. But I also have the memory (albeit from a much younger me) of telling my dad that there aren't any female criminals. He quickly corrected me on that, however. I was probably around four or five. Just a product of our culture, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:25 AM
8

When I was a kid, I remember hearing the term reverse sexism and not understanding why it just wasn't called sexism. It made zero sense to me.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:25 AM
1

In about seven months, it won't matter, but unless they automatically sign you up upon voting, I guess I'm not registered. I thought it was impossible to get a job unless you were signed up, too.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:38 PM
2

I wasn't told this when I registered.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:18 PM
1

Just like how some young men aren't forced to go if there is a family situation that need them to stay home, I don't think pregnant women would be required to go either. If it is ever reinstated, then women should certainly be required to sign up, as well, but with a pregnancy, you wouldn't only be putting an incapacitated woman in danger, but an unborn infant who has no business being in a war situation.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:37 AM
1

If draft is ever reinstated, hopefully people will make big enough of a deal to petition that women be required to sign up, as well. However, I'd rather it just never be reinstated. As much as I want to fight for equality, it would break my heart to see the love of my life forced into a situation like this. So, I'd just rather that nobody required to sign up.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:35 AM
3

It was really bad with Vietnam in the 70's. Young men who were morally opposed to the war often ran away to Canada to dodge draft. There was a widespread cultural disgust for these "goldbricking draft-dodgers". We haven't had an active draft since the 80's and nobody's been prosecuted for not signing up since then, but the laws are still on the books. If draft is ever reinstated, I think that, in these modern times there may be a greater resistance to it. Or maybe I'm just being naive. It's pret…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:33 AM
2

I was under the impression that you were automatically signed up when you registered to vote. I'm 25 (one year away from being ineligible for draft anyway) and I've never received this pamphlet.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:28 AM
12

How are you on the internet? Does your cave have electricity?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:27 AM
14

Yeah, that's the way! Instead of actually discussing something, insult your audience and change the topic! Feminism.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:44 PM
2

You're missing my point. Arresting someone after a crime has been committed isn't preventing a crime. And raiding a house, without a warrant, on a tip, isn't preventing a crime either. I'm not sure which example you were referring to, so I clarified both.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:15 PM
0

Not where I live. They just raid meth labs and bust pot dealers, where the "crimes" have already been committed. I'm not saying that there are no cops who try to prevent crimes, but there have been so very notable cases where they haven't. It's not just a "technicality". It's something people should be aware of, so they can try to be responsible for their own safetly. In all honesty, it's better than them raiding someone's house and killing their dog because they got a tip that they might be gro…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:56 PM
4

I heard a rumor that one of the mods of SRS is related or married to a Reddit admin. Though this is a rumor and probably isn't true.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:33 PM
1

I don't get it. Why was he shadowbanned?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:20 PM
-2

Actually, no. It's not the job of the police to stop a crime from happening.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:14 PM
2

I know, I know. But...it's a touchy subject around here. Remember, there are probably plenty of redditors browsing this sub who have been accused of pedophilia just for being close to their children/brothers/sisters/nibblings/etc. No harm was meant, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone who's been through Hell saw it and just took it the wrong way. Not your fault, but...ya know.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:12 PM
2

I mean, he has a legitimate claim, though. I agree with chocoboat, that he probably shouldn't bring it up to her, now. They both sound like they were pretty young when it happened and even though rape is inexcusable, I don't think she meant it maliciously. Probably blind ignorance. This is what happens when you have a culture that teaches men and women that all men are always in the mood all of the time. And if they aren't, then they must be suffering from ED or something.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:07 PM
7

I'm just so depressed by this. I'm so tired guys. I can't debate this stuff anymore. I just get this overwhelming feeling that the majority of people out there don't care about men's rights or what's going with it and the myriad of other social and political injustices. Maybe it's just because I'm depressed anyway, but I feel alone. Virtually no woman I know understands this movement or feels much sympathy with me.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:03 PM
0

I respectfully disagree. I can't read French, so I'm going off what I've learned from this thread. She's going to a Catholic school right? Or at least a school with strict rules on sex. I don't think anyone this young should be shamed for their sexuality, in this kind of circumstance. Frankly, I find a lot of the reactions in this thread to be prude-ish.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:09 AM
2

How the fuck has she abused anyone?? This entire act was consensual. I stand up for rape victims. I visit this sub almost every fucking day. Where the Hell you get off with these baseless accusations is beyond me. The fact that you conflated this situation with rape, shows you have no real regard for actual rape victim. Go the fuck back SRS.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:45 PM
-1

Nymphomania is a psychological condition...
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:07 AM
-5

No, I am not. I never said she was inexperienced. Experienced does not equal nympho.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:39 PM
13

I agree. But the view of women still suffers because of it. When women are taught that they don't have to be responsible about sex, it essentially forces them into a childlike role in social circumstances. It is incredibly sexist to both men and women. Benevolent sexism against men (implying that all men are tough, muscular he-beasts) is just as bad, because it implies that's all men are good for and it shames any men who aren't that way and tries to tell them that they aren't real men.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:12 PM
12

Look, I won't argue that people choose to ignore sexism against men because it's "really sexism against women", but you cannot deny that this is incredibly sexist to both men and women. If you fight to eradicate both, then it will happen a lot faster than if you just focus on one.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:09 PM
5

There's nothing wrong with having sex with multiple people.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:02 PM
-6

I wasn't directly blaming you. Because having sex with multiple people doesn't seem to indicate nymphomania to me. Nymphomania is an actual psychological problem where a person is obsessed with sex 24/7. Just being sexually open-minded and free does not make one a nymphomaniac. It just doesn't seem accurate and seems to imply that wanting to have sex with multiple people is "bad" and she must be mentally disturbed to want that. I can't read French, so I don't really know what the article says.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:02 PM
-7

Does anyone else consider the term nymphomaniac out of order and offensive?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:41 PM
16

Boy genitals are evil. Girl genitals are pure and holy.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:37 PM
64

It is offensive to women. I don't think people realize that sexism against women, usually is, in turn, sexism against men and vice versa. In a lot of cases, they are intrinsically linked.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:35 PM
7

This makes me disgusted with male circumcision. Why in the world would anybody think this kind of thing is an acceptable risk for no reason? I can understand if there's something wrong and the child needs a circumsicion, but Jesus Christ, your parents ruined your sex life for nothing I'm so so sorry. :(
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:30 PM
10

Isn't throwaway simply another word for alt account? I'm glad this is posted here, but I think posters should get the OP's consent first and at least indicate that they aren't OP. If they are lying about this being a throwaway, then they are doing even worse than failing to indicate that.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:53 AM
1

It was a joke....
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:50 AM
2

Evidence can be faked. Look, sexual assault can ruin your life and put you in prison. That's fine as long as you deserve it. The system was set up to be overkill when it comes to determining guilt. I don't care if fifty men saw her kill the President and cook him over an open fire. She gets a trial. If this were a man we were speaking about, you'd be quicker to agree. Let's not let feminism make us forget actual equality and the way the law is supposed to work.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:34 PM
2

Yes, we do need that and it is not just a ritual, despite the evidence. Due process exists for a reason.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:16 PM
1

I totally agree. If she didn't, I'd be pretty pissed off.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:29 PM
1

I agree with the person who replied to you, that is presumption of guilt. In this country, we presume they are innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:23 PM
5

Look, obviously she's guilty, but she deserves due process. Everyone deserves due process. Let's not forget that. Too damn many people do.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:02 PM
4

Right. She deserves not to have anything put in jeopardy until she goes through a fair trial. However, given that the evidence is pretty clear cut, after that, she should have to face a shit storm.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:01 PM
16

That's a bit extreme as far as punishments go...and why force the student to have the surgery?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:00 PM
5

I think it's pretty obvious what she was thinking. She was horny.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:59 PM
2

But this not the attitude for the article to have. We want change to happen in the public's perception, as well.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:58 PM
1

That was him? I remember seeing that years ago when a female friend posted it on Facebook, urging people not to freak out and just to laugh about it. It was kinda funny, actually.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:41 PM
8

Not sure why this was downvoted. It's perfectly valid and correct. Men are just as bad as setting a strict narrow definition of what being a man is, just as much as women. The image of men is a horribly confining role that allows for little individuality or freedom. Seriously, I know this going to sound ridiculous, but people do not bat an eye when a woman wants to wear pants. But it's considered absolutely absurd if a heterosexual male wants to wear a skirt. And many say that they wouldn't judg…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:13 PM
25

This woman belongs behind fucking bars.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:22 AM
13

I agree with everything you said, but why in the world is your atheism relevant?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:36 PM
2

Wil Wheaton is against the MRM? I...I'm kind of crushed by this.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:44 AM
7

It comes from both the left and the right. You're crazy if you think it doesn't.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:37 AM
10

Don't you know? Cameras steal souls. The patriarchy collects the souls of women and concentrates them into voodoo virility juice.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:39 AM
2

I have never understood why feminists are against porn. Women watch porn, as well. This isn't a male-only media. Demonizing sexuality is NEVER a good idea.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:13 PM
1

Thank fucking God. I saw your title and started to get sick at my stomach. I swear, I see so much depressing stuff in this sub (not that it shouldn't be posted here...I'm just disgusted at the sexism that abounds) that it's gotten to the point where I'll avoid coming here some days. It's really fucking beaten me down. :(
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:20 AM
3

What's exactly in it? My connection is too slow.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:32 PM
46

Hate crime? This is attempted rape.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:30 PM
5

Pretty sure you wouldn't want to date a feminist, regardless of how desperate you might be.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:44 AM
2

Well, generally when you look for mates based solely on appearances and don't set standards for personality, you end up with a shitty person. That's not really anything you can cite. There aren't studies on that. It's sort of just a common sense factor in dating and relationships. Seriously, have you never watched any romantic comedy ever?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:43 AM
18

Is there really a social stigma these days for men being the main caretaker of the household? Yes. I know guys who are and their in-laws like to refer to them as deadbeats and lazy assholes. It's pretty much the norm.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:19 AM
3

Except you get banned for disagreeing with any of their members.....
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:17 AM
7

Feminism doesn't seem to believe in homosexuals.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:22 PM
5

Yeah, but with jokes like this, sometimes less.....intelligent people take it as genuine and start parroting it like it's a legitimate stance on social issues. That's how sexist idiots are born.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:20 PM
14

I wish this were true. They are the minority, but they speak up from time to time. They almost always get downvoted horribly, though. However, I have noticed that when SRS brigades, they will upvote those posts to make this sub look like it's sexist to the outside.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:18 PM
26

Yeah, fuck that. Gyms are expensive. I had a very strict schedule when I went to the gym and it's not easy to just change your workout routine because the women can't face their issues. I felt like an idiot, working out in my tank tops with my pale skin, but I just got over it by not looking at other people and actually working the fuck out.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:52 AM
44

Unfortunately, feminism has granted a lot of people an out for their problems. I wish I had that privilege for similar problems I face, but I never expected it.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:50 AM
22

First time I've ever been to that sub. They really are children aren't they? I just don't understand how so many humans can actually behave like this.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 04:34 PM
2

That only applies to words that are repurposed. Like the word 'gay'. This does not apply to words that people use incorrectly through ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:05 PM
0

That is what the word currently means. Its hard to believe that people are actually bitching me out for using proper grammar.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:41 PM
0

at least on Reddit
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:02 PM
0

How in the world could I have been a troll??
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:07 PM
2

It wasn't though. I had no idea what his job was. He said that he investigates these things all the time, but never elaborated on that. There's nothing wrong with that, but is it really necessary to downvote someone for asking a fucking question?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:28 AM
0

You're a sick heartless fuck. You don't care anything about real rape victims, if the way you trivialize rape is any indication.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:53 AM
8

Sigh, I really wish there was a way to expel all of the SRS trolls from this sub. This thread is rife with people bashing men's rights and hating on this post. This shit has grown exceedingly worse lately.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:52 AM
3

Take your fucking trolling bullshit and go elsewhere with it. I'm so sick of this sub being overrun by childish trolls who don't have anything better to do.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:49 AM
4

She can revoke her consent at any time before the act is finished. Not afterwards. Common sense would indicated that "anytime" means anytime before the act is actually finished, but then...the people who take that to mean ANYtime aren't usually practicioners of common sense.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:47 AM
5

It's both. However, a lot of feminists, at least on Reddit, do not agree with you.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:43 AM
3

Why is this downvoted? This was a legitimate question.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:41 AM
0

No need to be a dick about it. I wasn't proclaiming how righteous I was for having an all-encompassing knowledge of image compression. However, I did mean that it was much more blocky than that. The artifacts weren't as rounded as in your image and seemed to follow a straight line. For example, alongside the "L"s in one of the words, the artifacts followed. But that's just my observation. Just because I'm wrong or might be wrong about one thing regarding image compression doesn't mean I "know no…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:44 PM
-1

Yes, but they don't appear around text like that. In this case the artifacts only surround the text, at times strictly around the form of the letters, as though the letters were patched in one by one.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:40 PM
2

Yeah, this seems incredibly fake to me. I feel like this sort of post makes people have reason to make fun of this sub :/
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:37 PM
5

I did read through the entire thread, in fact. You completely changed your argument when you started losing.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:25 AM
24

Don't you know? You have a dick. That means you are supposed to worship the very ground that women walk on and NEVER step out of line. Not being attracted to vagina makes you Misogynistic Prick, by default.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:20 AM
3

Please do not change what you were arguing about when you being to lose an argument? That's a shoddy tactic that SRS'ers always resort to when the Misogynistic Logic Voodoo starts to rape them.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:19 AM
2

Taller women are actually seen as attractive, believe it or not. Why is this hard to believe? Tall women make me go weak in the knees.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:16 AM
4

I think this has changed a lot. A lot of people are more open minded and aren't as judgemental about appearances. In addition, I think more women are respecting the fact that men, just like women, have physical appearance preferences regarding the people they date. That said, there will always be shitty people out there, male and female, who will reject you because your hair isn't the right shade of red they like. Although, I'm suddenly having a lot of memories of being passed over because I'm n…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:15 AM
4

But just because the defendant isn't found guilty doesn't mean the accuse is lying right? I mean, we've always said this wouldn't be a gamble type of thing. Where if you accuse someone of rape and it can't be proved then you face jail time. If the accuser is found guilty of a false accusation, however, then absolutely they should be charged for lying court.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:03 PM
8

No, it actually fucking isn't.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:45 AM
3

Yeah, I agree. I find a lot of the jokes in Family Guy funny, for example, even though a lot of them are pretty offensive. But this is straight up contrived just to mock and humiliate men. I'm so sick of having this extremely narrow definition of gender that I am forced to adhere to because I'm male. It may sound weird to you guys, but the day when men wearing skirts isn't looked on as any stranger than women wearing pants is the day I look forward to. Because then men will have finally broken o…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:32 AM
4

God dammit, why are there so many fucking trolls in this thread?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:45 AM
5

You are disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:35 AM
4

What kind of feminist is she?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:33 AM
1

This makes me really sad to read this. Especially on this subreddit. There is nothing wrong with being proud of who you are, whether you are male, female, black, white, Asian, European, or Russian.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:59 PM
2

Why?? I'm just as proud about being white as I am proud about being male. Saying that being proud of being white makes just as much sense as saying being proud of being male makes you a misogynist. When it comes down to it, they are things that are out of my control so it feels a little strange feeling "proud" about it, but if my gay friend can feel proud for being gay, then why can't I be proud for who I am?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 02:35 AM
2

There really isn't enough facts given to us to decide this. Others have stated that he was only the mother's boyfriend and had no relation to the kids. Some have guessed that he might have had past criminal behavior, though that shouldn't matter because they now have current criminal behavior. This is still sorta an MR issue, but less of one than the title of this post indicated (not blaming you op. We just need more info). Regardless, the kids should be taken away from their mother. This is sti…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:17 PM
0

If you're going to visit /r/MensRights please don't troll. We don't go to SRS just to start shit.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:17 PM
12

I've been here for a year and this comment blew my mind.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:53 AM
2

These are the tactics that feminists resort to: censorship. This is no victory.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:21 PM
-1

You get *nauseated. If you were nauseous then that means you make other people sick. Edit: This wasn't just me being a grammar Nazi. When people make this error, they are insulting themselves. I thought I was doing this person a favor by helping them avoid a potentially embarrassing situation in the future. But, no, go ahead and downvote me, because Reddit believes anyone who ever corrects another redditor should be burned at the stake for being a grammar witch.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:45 PM
2

I'm sorry, but Will Ferrell is about as funny as a potato. Edit: Seriously, guys, I usually get that everyone has a different sense of humor and I'm generally open minded about it, but this is Will Ferrell. I can't fathom how anyone doesn't want to peel their skin off when watching him, just so they'll have something to do.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:42 PM
26

FACTS ARE MISOGYNIST!
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:04 PM
17

Are you sure? Sounds like she'd thrive at Zynga.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:48 PM
22

These people are murderers. There is no bullshit about that. There is literally no difference between officers like this than sick serial killers who kill people for fun. These pieces of shit deserve life in prison for this. And the state had better start paying this family through the fucking nose. It boggles my mind how our police forces just keep criminals in their ranks. These people are murderers. Yet, they get paid vacations for killing innocent civilians. Fuck this goddamn country! FUCK I…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:03 PM
14

What...is happening in this comments thread? Are we being brigaded?
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:16 AM
9

But it has changed. Feminism used to be this wonderful thing. Social movements change over time. I feel like I don't know what sub I'm on.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:12 AM
1

Huh? So now I can't be a submissive guy in bed? Seriously, fuck that. BDSM and rape are not the same.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:02 PM
1

So now I can't be an MRA unless I buy sensationalized click bait aimed to make money? No, seriously, fuck you. You don't represent me or ALL of /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:00 PM
-2

Oh okay! I didn't realize it meant every woman. Guess I better just believe that blindly!
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:59 PM
2

It's not similar, though.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:57 PM
2

Most of what he wrote was bullshit. You can enjoy rough sex or BDSM without it interfering with "gender politics". I'm a guy who loves to be treated the way you do, more or less, by my girlfriend. Just because I'm into kinky sex, does not mean I have some type of rap fantasy.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:57 PM
4

I really wish people would stop thinking that enjoying rough sex means you're mentally disturbed.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:55 PM
0

Well...first of all. BDSM is not rape. She does not want to be raped. It's the same way I like to be abused in bed, yet I'm all for Men's Rights. IT'S NOT RAPE. Second of all, I would get out of this relationship. If she is anti men's rights, it means she doesn't respect you. Seriously, she doesn't respect your gender. Please consider rethinking this relationship...for your own good. What happens if she decides she doesn't want to be with you anymore and shows these bruises that you give her fro…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:52 PM
0

50 Shades is to BDSM what army men are to a battle scenario. And 50 Shades is actually a rewritten Twilight fanfic, by the way.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:45 PM
3

Free speech
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:04 PM
4

...guns don't kill people.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:37 PM
5

By whom?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:36 AM
6

I was ashamed when I followed the link and it took me to a green text story. I can't believe this many people actually think this is real.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:49 PM
98

Sigh, guys, none of this is real. Green text 4chan stories are always fictional. They're supposed to be made up. I kind of can't believe this ended up on this subreddit and so many people took it seriously. None of this ever happened.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:47 PM
2

How did I know that someone would take me seriously?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:23 PM
1

Look, I know the law favors women in harassment and rape allegations, but assuming that every woman is going to scream rape when you speak to her is just as bad the feminists who scream Schrodinger's Rapist when they refuse to speak to me. There is nothing that would indicate harassment in the Original Commenter's post.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:22 PM
12

It was originally a quote from Hitler.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:44 AM
7

I'm so confused. What was supposed to be harassment?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:37 AM
4

What the fuck for? Speaking to her??
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:36 AM
16

Yep, if we're going with this logic, then we ,might as well restrict all of the rich/famous/politicians from a jury trial. Whenever rich people do something criminal (think the Libor Scandal) they get away with it. I don't doubt that this happens to alleged rapists, as well. But it's classist problem, not a sexist one. Refusing anyone a trial by jury, though, is unconstitutional regardless of their sex, age, class, or offense.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:09 PM
17

Accurate.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:16 PM
38

I hope the developers of this app burn in Hell. Just the idea that I could be on there is objectifying. I've already reported it to Google for abuse on the app store and left a negative one star review. Fortunately, there were many other such reviews and the majority of the reviews were one star, with five stars being the second most given score.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:33 PM
19

You mean, you can't even check it out unless you're a woman??
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:16 PM
4

I think it means women having a career, kids, family, etc. etc. I believe that's women mean when they say they want to have it all. Yet usually (and this is not every case), a lot of women say this but don't realize that they have to make sacrifices in one area is they try to have a career and take care of children. Fathers are generally expected to work 9-5 five days a week and have little relationship with their kids beyond a financial one. However, people are tying to make things easier for w…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:49 PM
1

Doesn't really make sense. Of course JFK would not be in line with the modern day Democratic party. Abraham Lincoln wouldn't be in line with the modern day Republican party. Politics change and evolve over time. The parties don't stand for the things they used to.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:32 PM
1

If I held the job that my girlfriend current has and we got married, then nobody would think twice if my gf suddenly decided not to work and that we made enough. However, if we got married and we decided that she makes enough to support us both, and I decided to keep the house, then everyone would call me a lazy deadbeat. Men are supposed to be workhorses.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:28 PM
1

So it's entirely subjective on who you think isn't bonkers? Yeah. I can see this is going to end well.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:23 PM
1

He wasn't the only other choice.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:22 PM
0

Wasn't possible. I'm a slim guy with a fast metabolism. When I was working out all the time, I was like a human vacuum. I ate all the freaking time. After the gym I'd eat a huge meal, then I'd go to work. I'd probably eat a snack like a Chicolate covered cheese cake during my shift. Then on break I'd eat another full meal. Perhaps another snack if I needed it after break. Then a moderate sized meal when I got off. Thern I'd go home and I guarantee you I'd eat something else before going to sleep…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:07 AM
1

In this case, I wasn't necessarily saying that all feminists are TERFs. When I was speaking out against TERFs I was mainly speaking out against...TERFs. I'm not the kind of person to say that ALL feminists seek to enslave men or anything like that. There are many self proclaimed feminists who truly care about equal rights for both sexes, trans, gay, bisexual, what have you. There are undoubtedly MRAs who are hateful to trans folk and the like. However, and I don't mean this to be confrontational…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:22 AM
2

Fuck yeah it is. Back when I was going to the gym nearly every day, the only part of me that really buffed up were my biceps. I found it attainable to achieve some respectable biceps, but forget about abs. Even going to the ab room at the gym, every visit, I still had that "spare tire". And that was after running on the treadmill 30 minutes a day for at least four days a week. My specs never really buffed up either. They flattened out, but the only part of me that bulked up were my shoulder musc…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:07 AM
5

I don't think so. A negative comment score, when large enough, essentially censors your post. It becomes hidden by default. I'm also a little personally bitter about this topic, as this is the first time I've ever posted this question and it have a positive karma score. And every time I've phrased it the same way, not taking the position of one side or the other.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:49 PM
0

When I edited, I was in the negatives. This has since changed.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:41 PM
2

I wasn't trying to sound argumentative or imply that you disagreed, in my last comment. It's not surprising to me either, anymore. There was a time when I thought feminists were people who tried to end discrimination and oppression, but from what I've seen the movement as a whole only seeks to further the goals of oppressors and to keep women in a child-like role.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:18 AM
3

True enough. But the flack that trans women are getting from feminists is unique. Be aware that I'm not saying they are receiving worse treatment than men. Feminists are trying to fuck all old us over. However, it truly sucks that people who are really women aren't accepted by the group that claims to support women.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:51 AM
1

According to this theory, the writers of The Lone Gunmen were involved in 9/11.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:27 AM
3

This case in entirely specific to transgendered people....
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:23 AM
7

But then can we use that argument for murder? A fetus may be useless, but if it scientifically considered a human life, then why is it any less entitled to the right to live than anyone else? As it is, nobody can tell me if a fetus is or is not a living human being. Humans may kill each other all of the time, but murder isn't sanctioned by law. Arguing that murdering a fetus is less morally wrong than a birthed human is not logical. To declare that a fetus isn't a human life, would satisfy the c…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:36 AM
2

How the fuck can you be jailed for insulting somebody?!? God fucking dammit, that alone pisses me off, not just at feminists like her, but at this whole fucking PC "justice" system.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:20 AM
2

The media is too interested in Justin Bieber being arrested go focus on real problems like this or the NSA. I'm still pissed that every goddamn citizen in this country hasn't protested about the Snowden leaks.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:16 AM
1

I agree that begging for karma is stupid, but if it pulls a good point out of the negatives, then upvote if you agree. Reddit allows it's user base to censor anyone stating an unpopular opinion, whether it's true or false.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:14 AM
1

The JFK papers are still classified and won't be made public until 2029. And there's talk that the President then will probably just indefinitely delay it once the date arrives. I'm not saying there's any kind of conspiracy in there, necessarily, just that they should declassify it. It will either put an end to all the theories or validate one of them. It's been long enough anyway, that fifty one years ago.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:13 AM
5

Men also have the right to disallow an embryo becoming a child. Uhh...when the fuck did this happen?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:08 AM
14

I'm sorry, but your last paragraph doesn't make any sense to me. It's almost the exact opposite. Men legally have no choice to abandon a pregnancy, yet women do. You said yourself that men are equally responsible for the pregnancy, yet the get very unequal choices about how to handle it. If a couple has a child and the mother wants to give it away or abort it he has no choice in the matter, even if he wants to keep it. If she wants to keep it, he also has no choice in the matter. Nobody is sayin…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:01 AM
15

I have a very legitimate question I want to ask. Maybe if I ask here, you guys will actually answer me. Every time I post this anywhere, I get downvoted and called names. The abortion debate is often simplified into opposing positions that aren't traced back to the root of the issue. Pro-Life'rs claim that when a child is conceived, it is already a human life. And that to abort the pregnancy is to murder a helpless person. Pro-Choice'rs claim that a fetus is not a human life until it is born and…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:52 AM
20

The idea is that the woman became pregnant accidentally. After she becomes pregnant, she still has a say whether or not she wants to be responsible for the child. The man does not. Edit: And if you're argument "Where the Hell did the sperm come from?" is applicable to men not getting a say in keeping a pregnancy, then so should "Where the Hell did the eggs come from?" be applicable to women getting a choice in the pregnancy.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:40 AM
2

Of course. The government is infallible. If these people were arrested then it must mean they are the scum of the earth.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:01 AM
1

I'm sorry I let you down.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:44 PM
54

Facts are rape.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:06 AM
1

Silly head? You're a lot nice than I would have been.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:55 AM
0

We need to send very politely worded emails to them about how offensive and sexist this is, how we will refuse to use their service, and inform everyone we know not to use it, as well. It would be a start.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:54 AM
2

If nothing further happens, I would sue her for defamation.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:20 AM
12

Is this a self shot or just a nice find?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:18 AM
2

I wouldn't mind attending a Fucking Women's College...
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:46 AM
1

Can you imagine have PTSD every time you got an erection or became wet? Those peoples lives are ruined. Rape is disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:36 AM
5

Let's get this thread to the top. Fuck this site.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:55 AM
-3

Wow, you're quite a little but, aren't you?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:32 AM
-1

Tell me about it. It's depressing.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:15 PM
3

This is /r/Mensrights, but... It is always appropriate and on-topic to discuss Game of Thrones. [Not sarcasm]
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:37 AM
8

You act as though he doesn't want to pay it, almost to the point of challenging his love for the child. If he doesn't have it then it doesn't matter if he believes his child is worth 1.5 billion dollars. He doesn't have it.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:30 AM
12

It is when you're broke as fuck.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:10 AM
2

I don't judge the activist's motives or talent, but, unfortunately, writing for The Daily Mail will probably bring him/her down. The Daily Mail is a tabloid that reports some less than factual stories, sometimes. I'm not speaking out against whoever this activist is, but it will be better for them and the MRM if they were to move up the ladder, if possible, and put TDM behind them.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:40 AM
2

Oh dear God, The Daily Mail is cheap tabloid.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:03 AM
12

I understand why you're upset. It bothers me too. But in actuality, the people running this place are actually being progressive and are supporting men and men's rights. It's society that is fucked up that the sign has to be worded like that. Probably, in the past, the dad's part was not there and they got complaints from women saying there were men in the"family" room. They put up the sign to show these women that men are part of the family and are welcome and allowed, as well.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:00 AM
4

It really depends on his custody rights.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:47 PM
3

I said that isn't the case here. I was referring to custody hearings at large. Of course she is paying for the child. The point is, she's not even using the child support money. She doesn't need it or she wouldn't be using it to tithe.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:42 PM
4

Too bad that it's The Daily Mail, and no one will take it seriously. :/
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:36 PM
1

No... A not-biased system would award both parents with equal timed shared custody. We do no stand for hypocritical ideals in the MRM. That's feminism's gig.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:26 PM
3

Why is it solely the father's job? Why not the mothers? We have this classic system where the father pays for the children to be raised and only the woman sees them. What part of that sounds right? I mean, I know that's not every case, but that is the direction that most situations lean to. If women are truly equal then men should not be made solely financially responsible for children that belong tonboth of them.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:25 PM
3

But why does he even need to pay it?? His ex wife and her husband are able to provide for the kids. OP's boyfriend is barely scraping by. I'm against placing child support squarely on men from the get go, anyway. Any amount is unreasonable, especially in this circumstance.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:18 PM
1

What was the original comment?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:56 PM
6

Jesus Christ, you guys.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:15 PM
10

You must be a car.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:12 PM
0

Jesus, do you work for the NSA or something?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:10 PM
2

This is the exact arguments that feminists use. They state that if one innocent man is charged to keep all women safe, then it's worth it. You're pretty much taking this same stand except with men. It is not worth it. A thousand safe citizens is not worth one innocent person behind bars. The moment that it is, then nobody is truly safe.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:09 PM
1

I'm not belittling the OP here for anything, but... My post had 218 points. This one has 315. I wonder if this at all reflects the attitude of our sub? Preoccupation with the negative when the positive is right there? Don't get me wrong, there are tons of negative things that we need to focus on to make the world a better place, but maybe we don't always praise the ones who actually have the right attitude toward men's rights?
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:33 PM
2

It's not as bleak as it looks. Link to my /r/MensRights post from a few days ago.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:26 PM
8

I guess you're right. I wasn't thinking clearly. But it feels strange if a person of academic reputation does something (probably worse than this) that deserves a discommendation or discredit remains in a status of academic authority because of how long they've been a professor. I guess this is why it's a double-edged sword.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:07 AM
5

Which is fucking ridiculous. Who the Hell ever thought that would be a good idea. Edit: I was wrong. It's not fucking ridiculous. I wasn't really thinking about it that way. Though, it is still worrisome that people of academic authority can completely go off their rocker, abuse their tenure and nothing can be done about it.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:40 AM
1

If you thought Yellow was bad here...she got worse.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:24 PM
2

We've been dating for two and a half years. I don't see her up and changing personality like that. Edit: She's generally supportive of Men's Rights. At least the portions concerning it that I've discussed with her.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:20 PM
3

Oh. Well I see how he could use that to indicate a spelling error, but it was very poor wording on his part. And editing your without noting it is kind of douchey...
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:30 AM
4

Unfortunately, that was just me. I wish it were someone else, but oh well.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:28 AM
1

It wouldn't surprise me since you aren't allowed to have an erection in public.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:22 AM
2

I think some people here just don't read the posts. If a reply like this is anything other than a solidly positive praise of the above point, then it must mean he is a feminist troll. That is two people who thinks that since /u/namefaceguy criticized the poster's spelling he must be a misandristic monster.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:17 AM
9

That might be counter productive. A proper approach may be to steer the topic to 'feminism can definitely help fix these things, if they join with MRA's' Something I'd personally love to see one day is a group of MRAs and Feminists jointly start campaign to end sexism. That would be beautiful to behold.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:14 AM
4

The OP.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:05 AM
2

A woman once told me that men only hold the door open for women so that they can look at their asses. I hope that bitch loses both arms and has to have everyone hold doors open for her. Edit: Okay, I don't because that's really cruel.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:07 AM
0

I'm proud to say that I hold the door open for everyone, whether male, female, dwarf, chicken, or purple-people eater. Hell, even if I have tot stand there for a minute because you're that far away, I'm likely to do it.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:05 AM
1

It's frustrating because I cannot give irrefutable proof that it was posted. If this were a joke that a random person posted tot Twitter or Facebook it wouldn't be as offensive. It was a sexist joke made by page that directly deals with sexism. That's why it's so inappropriate and offensive to me, an MRA. I generally have a thick hide regarding offensive jokes. Honestly, the joke alone doesn't really bother me. It's just that there are people who will see that joke and be offended by it. They wo…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:30 PM
2

I don't even know what Manboobz is. I never said that slandering the name of a small group isn't a bad thing. I merely meant that it would suck if a large number of people thought this is the general attitude of MRAs. I guess I don't have any proof then. Yes, I could have easily faked my screens, but I didn't. If this were a lawsuit or something handled in an official debate then my argument wouldn't stand. But this is Reddit and I'm not trying to win a debate or anything. I just thought I'd try…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:51 PM
1

The best evidence I have is the second link I provided. I'm sorry, but when they delete the post there just isn't any way to show it. But why would OP lie about this? If it is a fake, then all he would be accomplishing would be tarnishing the name of an MRA page. I really don't want to be offensive, but the two links I provided, while not blatant evidence, are fairly convincing. Or maybe I'm wrong and I just feel this way because I saw and replied to the post in question, myself. Why would I lie…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:06 PM
4

It's not fake. The page owner must have deleted it. I commented on it when this was posted here. The owner replied back and compared us to feminists for whining. Here is the notification I got for his reply. When you follow the notification it takes you to the post that was deleted, but says it has a connection error. It doesn't show any of the comments but it does show the original post. Edit: Sorry, I posted the same link twice. It has been fixed. Edit 2: Just for clarification, when I actuall…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:46 PM
2

Seriously? Why are you bragging about the amount of women you've allegedly hooked up with? Insecure, maybe?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:15 AM
1

O_o I think you're the one who needs psychiatric help...
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:13 AM
1

Ha. This made me laugh out loud. You're like a child.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:11 AM
1

How do you walk around everyday without dying from the sheer stupidity that is engorged in your brain?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:10 AM
1

It's not. I went to the page and commented on it myself.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:05 AM
1

It wasn't my statement. I was referring to what people in this thread were saying.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:03 AM
21

This has nothing to do with the point of this post.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:29 AM
217

I'm actually surprised at how many here are pointing out it doesn't make sense because most women initiate divorce. This isn't anything to even be discussed. This is outrageously offensive. Anyone who says this is obviously not interested in furthering men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:27 AM
0

This really hurts me and makes me depressed.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:17 AM
14

Women are allowed to post here. We welcome them with open arms.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:45 PM
2

It's a tabloid. I really can't believe I'm having to defend this point.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:00 PM
0

No. I'm definitely not 'left-leaning' as you imply. But good job making a snap judgement about somebody you've only read one comment from.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 06:25 PM
0

Yes. I was just speaking where most would agree. I would say Fox is the worst, but you pretty much can't trust any broadcast news source.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:30 PM
-2

It's like someone trying to convince me to trust something from Fox news. I won't. If it shows up on another news site, as well, then it gets my attention. But I don't waste time with the Daily Mail. You don't go looking for news from a tabloid. Sorry.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 03:07 PM
2

Daily mail is a renowned tabloid new source. Just Google it. This is well known.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 02:27 PM
3

Oh I have. I was downvoted to oblivion and pretty much shut down. I remember...someone mentioned that the posted topic wasn't a men's rights issue. Someone replied to him essentially saying "There's always one of you shouting 'this is not a men's rights issue'. And you're always wrong. Go away." And the poster claiming it wasn't a men's rights issue was in the negative numbers. Everyone was bitching him out. I replied to one of them saying "To be fair, one or two of these are legitimately not a …
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:07 AM
7

And yet, if anyone ever even acknowledges that there might be a hypothetical post that isn't a men's rights issue, you'll be burned alive, in this sub.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:11 AM
4

Why are there so many trolls in this thread?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:04 PM
3

It's a troll.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:02 PM
1

O_o
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:31 AM
2

And in that case, your marriage to a man would probably only serve to further point blame at you. :(
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:20 AM
1

I read it as demonic.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:18 AM
3

You're right. It's the parents fault for not teaching the girl, earlier, that lying about something like this is wrong. It's also their fault for standing behind their daughter when she did this shit. They aren't much more mature than their shitty little offspring. This isn't to say, that she shouldn't be punished. She should be forced to understand that this was wrong and there are consequences for malicious lies and accusations.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:15 AM
8

To be fair, I don't think he should be arrested for that. He may be a prick, but he's a prick in the right.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:25 AM
20

I think in this sort of case, they should be outed and their shame shown to all. That man's reputation is ruined. So should that girls and her parents. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:23 AM
11

Unfortunately doesn't work that way. There are tons of extremist trolls here.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:22 AM
1

I would say that I'm glad that everyone is being censored equally. But I'm really not glad. This sucks. And it sucks that misogynist, racist, bigoted pages are censored as well. I am guaranteed my right to free speech through the right of the most Vila, disgusting person. In short, if someone can say he "hates sandniggers", then I can be assured that my right to speech will be allowed, as well. We may have gained equality for men though this, but we've all lost just a little bit more, as human b…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:38 AM
16

The message is good, but the underlying opinion of men as fathers is bad. It assumes that fathers are innately bad parents and must be reminded to be good fathers. It's possible the creators of the commercial completely missed this. While this is blatantly sexist, underneath the message, I see that a lot of things like this are unintentional and only exist because of the way society treats men. It's not seen as abnormal. Not making excuses, though.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:17 AM
3

I wish I had a cat with electric powers.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:13 PM
9

If the voluminous lies about PRISM and the NSA were not political suicide, then nothing is.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:41 PM
5

Both parties are wildly in favor of giving corporations the same or more rights as individuals.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:39 PM
6

This maybe true, but do you remember the TV reports and polls showing how many, many African Americans, who had never followed politics, registered to vote when Obama ran the first time? It was overwhelmingly disgusting. And it wasn't just the African American vote, as many Americans, in general, claimed they would vote for him just because they wanted to get a black president in office. I'm glad we are at a place where we can have a black president elected, but when the time comes that a black …
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:37 PM
1

But if you had dainty fingers it'd be fine, I, sure. I'm just joking with you, man. Your post made me snort my ramen.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:15 PM
11

This is a fair point. Body cavity searches rain on the just and the unjust.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:24 PM
2

Yeah, I generally had a good childhood. I mean, obviously, it wasn't the best because my parents were split, but I think everyone made the best they could of the situation. The only problems I think it might have cause would be minor psychological effects. I feel like I'm more incline to have a dual personality, as if the differences in child rearing that I experience every other week gave me different ideas about who I was supposed to be. These things aren't anyone's fault and rather just an un…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:53 PM
24

Both of my parents lived in the same city, most of the time. When my mom moved around, my paternal grandfather would meet her early in the morning and get me, to take me to school. It almost always worked out, okay. I guess my parents just made it happen? When you're a kid you don't think much of it, I suppose.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:48 AM
94

You know. I'm really glad I had rational parents. I think the judges were prepared to award primary custody to my mother, but that wasn't what she wanted. The both of them worked out a system where I would spend a week with her and then a week with him. Mother's Day I would always go to her, regardless of whose week it was and the same for Father's Day, to my dad's. Also, on my dad's birthday I would be with him and the same for my mother. I think on my birthday, they would get together and the …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:24 AM
0

Seriously, how are these trolls not banned?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:09 AM
2

I guess the same goes for any group solidarity. This is why you see ex-feminists who have been exiled because they held a number of ideas contrary to what feminism is about. There's no listening to reason, because the opposition is always wrong. To state otherwise is to blaspheme the all holy feminism. And to be totally fair, I've seen this behavior here, before, regarding Men's Rights. It's nowhere near as bad as the organization of feminism, as a whole, but there are still people here who won'…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:54 AM
3

I was thinking how ironic it was, when I mentioned that about self-reinforced ignorance. Not that what we are discussing is ignorant. But that anyone, when talking about a controversial topic in a group of people, the majority of whom all have a general consensus about their target subject, are extremely likely to validate each others opinion and confirm each other's theories. In layman's terms, and I say this with the best of intentions, Circlejerk. As for the future of MRM...well, yes, any mov…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:21 AM
8

You're right on all of those points. Debating a feminist on Facebook is akin to trying to capture and domesticate a waterfall. And when two people debate against one person, unless they are extremely rational and unbiased, it will be an unfair debate that will devolve into two people shouting "You're wrong" at the opposing party. There's something about shared ignorance that reinforces itself. "Hey that guy doesn't believe in gravity, either! That must make me a genius! We both must be geniuses!…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:32 AM
8

Well, maybe you shouldn't have tried to rape her with your math-penis.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:45 AM
25

This is pretty much the long and short of it. It pissed me off how she changed her argument whenever she was losing. Only she didn't really change it more than once...just kept alternating between two failing arguments.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:44 AM
1

I know nobody realizes this unless they've heard it before, but you shouldn't have spoken to the cops before you got a lawyer. It doesn't matter that you're innocent. There are so many things that you could have said, that you don't even realize could have been an admission of guilt. Don't talk to anymore cops or Vanessa until you have a lawyer. This is so important. The justice system in this country is unfair and will be used to make you look guilty even though you are innocent. You don't want…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:13 PM
4

I'd say you're lucky, but make sure you have a back up plan. She could further pursue this five or ten years down the road.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:10 PM
1

You're right. And I'm glad you're here. But can we just say she's a shame to decent people? I hate when we have these ideas of what a real man or what a real woman should be like. People who falsely accuse rape are major douches, regardless of their sex. Even though, one sex has an unfair advantage in the justice system.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:09 PM
1

He said "we'll call her Vanessa". I don't think that's really her name.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:07 PM
8

I'm glad we point out our misinformation and correct it, unlike what feminists seem to do. We will win no battles by being irrational.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:24 AM
5

I, personally, don't add the /s when using sarcasm on Reddit. Except for in this subreddit. I've learned from my mistakes.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:17 AM
7

Disciplined? He should be permanently dismissed.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:40 AM
0

Fair enough, but I don't think we should be blind to an instance of truth just because trolls use it as ammo. I mean, the proof I linked to above is damning, in my favor. I'm not a troll advocate and that was never my intention by saying threat 2-5 percent of the "Not a men's rights issue" can be legitimate. Surely it's not accepted that is no exception to this rule? Fuck it, I don't care anymore. It's not a big deal. I'm not a feminist or a troll and I'm satisfied in my own mind that I was maki…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:44 AM
1

It's hard for people to see what they believe isn't there.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:41 PM
1

Jesus Christ. Makes me thankful that my mother and father wanted me to have equal time with both of my parents, after they divorced. I cannot imaging having had it any other way. One week at my dads and one week at my moms, every year from 1992 to 2006 or 2007.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:33 PM
1

Did you point out that the wage gap is a myth or, rather, a lie? How did they react?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:29 PM
2

It should be perfectly fine to have disagreements online without being called a troll. I don't agree with your stance, but this is correct. We've been throwing around the name troll terribly. It sends a false idea of what a troll is to those who aren't sure or who don't realize what a troll and, more specifically, what a troll on /r/mensrights acts like.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:27 PM
0

he's a fucktard that should be put down. It looks like that's what you said, to me.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:59 AM
1

So you want anyone, who elects not to help someone in need, to be executed??
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:11 AM
2

But...all men love sex. Thus, rape, for men, is just a really awesome fuck session. Right? /s
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:33 PM
1

I'm glad there are influential(?), or at the very least, somewhat politically active women taking a stand on this. Makes me smile.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:30 PM
0

Bet it'd be no problem if the sexes were reversed.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:28 PM
0

Sigh, I'm about ready to give up on Reddit No, I'm not advocating trolls. Quite the opposite. In the thread I linked above, you'll see exactly what I was referring to. /u/nigglereddit was in fact trolling the poster who claimed it wasn't a men's rights issue, if you'll scroll down and see some of the comments he was posting in reply to someone else. It's not trolling to suggest that one or two of these "not a men's rights issue" comments out the twenty or thirty you see in a day are legitimate. …
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:15 PM
0

I don't think it's solely a male problem. It's probably not. I don't doubt for one second that this happens to women, too. Especially introverts. But we've all had a class with that girl who obviously spent all morning making herself stunning. Girls have that option. I'm not saying that some men don't get that kind of attention, but there certainly aren't as many. There is really nothing I can do to make myself more...attractive or noticeable than when I'm already trying. Sure, I can dress nice,…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:48 PM
1

I don't remember the details, but everyone was very clearly convinced it was not a men's rights issue. And the guy who said it wasn't a men's rights issue (because, a lot of threads have one of those) was up voted quite a bit. The troll who replied to him wouldn't give up and pretty much called everyone there a heartless monster and feminist troll. It was pretty clear that it wasn't an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:29 PM
0

I don't remember the details, but everyone was very clearly convinced it was not a men's rights issue. And the guy who said it wasn't a men's rights issue (because, a lot of threads have one of those) was up voted quite a bit. The troll who replied to him wouldn't give up and ended up calling most everyone in the thread heartless monsters.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:28 PM
1

The one the other day about a kid being beaten by his mother was not a men's rights issue. If he was black, would that have made it a civil rights issue? No.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:07 PM
-2

To be fair, I've seen at least a couple that were legitimate.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:34 PM
1

Not sure why this was downvoted. It may be your best/only option.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:06 AM
1

How on earth anyone can think that requiring women to register with the draft and abolishing the presumption a man should support his wife is taking rights away from women? How fucking stupid do you have to be to see any logic in that?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:43 AM
1

So, is Kickstarter Feminist a phrase yet?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:39 AM
1

I think he's just pointing out feminism's (and censorship, in general) crusade on human sexuality, male and female.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:30 AM
1

I mean, as progressive as I am, I still live in Alabama. As level headed as my girlfriend is, she won't accept just "shacking up". And I don't mean this in a man-trap way that she shouldn't. I mean I love her and want to marry her. And while I hate the legal nuances of marriage and how the system uses it, I want to be married. Maybe if there weren't such a huge social stigma, here in Alabama, about "living in sin" and having illegitimate children it would be different. But the way my family woul…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:25 AM
6

This needs far more upvotes.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:19 AM
1

I was expecting someone to ask why it was uncomfortable. Perhaps you should have, instead of jumping to a conclusion. I was asking questions like "Are yours like that?" when studying the anatomy section and the fact that one testicle may hang lower than the other. But, please, do not use that phrase. Others may not find it so, but it's offensive.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:05 AM
4

I feel that way when the classroom is full of women... Biology class was....uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:40 AM
10

I have to ask, though, how reliable is DailyCaller? "Top 50 Sluttiest Halloween Costumes"?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:23 AM
8

How the Hell is this supposed to work for female sex offenders? Forced sterility? Isn't that a little Nazi-ish? I'm pretty sure that's against the Geneva Convention, but, oh, that's right...the Geneva Convention doesn't apply to American domestic law. There is no equal punishment for all sex offenders. Thus you're only punishing the male sex offenders in this manner. Are men punished more severely than women in murder cases?? Oh wait...
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:19 AM
10

I'm so sorry. Don't think for one second that your erection meant you wanted it. It's been proven that your body will react to stimuli regardless of your emotional state. And it's been proven, and many can testify, that you can get erection when not excited. It just happens, especially at your age. It can happen to anybody, if their blood pressure goes up. I know you're very frightened to tell someone for fear that she will make it worse, but you do need to speak to therapist or, maybe, a school…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:11 AM
3

I know. I felt like the guy at the movies saying "Don't open that door!" He just let her base her entire argument on bullshit statistics.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:02 AM
2

Honestly, I just wish someone would do these for men. I'm not saying that dumb kids would actually take it seriously, but when I think of how many girls I stuck around with thinking that they would be faithful again or wanted something serious from me, I feel ashamed. Hell, I've was told that I was only good for sex, by one girl, yet I still stuck around. Part of me can't help but wonder if there were such a strong level of concern about boys and men's emotional wellbeing regarding relationhips …
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:42 AM
1

Please, no run-on sentences. I can't read this without feeling like I'm escalating in speed down a steep hill.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:37 AM
3

Democrats and Republicans aren't men. They're sheep. braces self
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:35 AM
1

This is great, guys. This will really help with debates... But I can't help but get depressed when looking at a wall of links regarding discriminatory, sexist, and unfair cases and abuses against my gender.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:33 AM
2

Wait, is that a real quote?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:19 AM
9

In other words... RAPE: You might not even know it's happening to you.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:47 AM
13

Because she wanted her pussy eaten.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:52 PM
-1

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:50 PM
3

It's a little confusing, I guess. There are regions where these alimony and child support laws are actually considered progressive. Yesterday's progressive is today's backwards.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:36 PM
2

Huh?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:17 PM
1

Sounds like someone really likes the Beatles.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:02 PM
0

Allow what type of abuse is being enacted on a person judge what kind of issue it is, not the color of the victim's skin or the sex of the victim. If a woman is raped, she has been raped. If a man is raped, he has been raped. If a black female child has been beaten, it's an issue of child abuse, not a women's rights issue nor a civil rights issue. If she was beaten because someone didn't like the color of her skin, then it is a civil rights issue.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:26 PM
3

Just don't give him any ammo. He's a troll trying to elicit a flame war from the MRA's and make the sub look bad.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:58 AM
3

That is not even close to what I said.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:55 AM
7

No offense, but it's kind of like saying that a scenario in which a black child is beaten by his father is a civil rights issue. It's an issue, none can argue, but it's child abuse, not a specific group issue.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:58 AM
1

That pretty much what I said. Facebook has the right to enforce it's rules. What I said was, that if I had my way, Facebooks rules would be that neither side should be censored.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:12 AM
38

What gets me is why Hell anyone needs to even ask this question. Can a woman kill someone? Can a black person be a racist? People are so monstrously stupid.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:07 AM
6

I admit, it's good that Facebook is starting to be fair on both sides, but I hate censorship. I don't think these "hate pages" on BOTH sides should be removed. Granted, Facebook can do whatever it wants, but this is really a petty achievement. Feminists act like children, bitching about the "Women Are Evil" Facebook pages. It's childish and sad. I really don't want us to stoop to that level. We need to be focusing on other matters. Anyone who visits this sub for the first time will see this and …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:36 PM
11

You're kidding right? Genital mutilation? Bah, we're men. Grow a pair and get over it. Arranged marriages? Pussy is pussy. Don't you like girls? Be grateful that you're gettin' some. Women are delicate and dainty. We need to treat them special. Sorry excuses for men. /s
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:07 PM
21

See, that's a place that actually needs an organization working for more rights for women. Instead, we have feminists, here, raising hell of a pay disadvantage that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:34 PM
3

Let's hope she's never allowed to practice law, anywhere. She blew her chance with this. I believe in second chances at forgiveness, but she doesn't deserve a second chance to take on so much responsibility when she obviously isn't trustworthy enough to handle it.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:13 AM
3

Just because the UK makes it a fuck over for men to get married doesn't mean love doesn't exist. It just indicates that, for some reason, the UK doesn't want young men to get married. Go fuck yourself, UK divorce laws.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:18 AM
1

Yep, it certainly is. Why don't you leave, so we have one less to deal with?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:09 AM
0

No. He's right on topic. You're making vast over generalizations and then condemning him for turning it back on you. Everything you've said here is hypocritical.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:07 AM
2

Yeah but some of the redditors who see this on /r/funny will think it's appropriate to joke about male rape.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:36 AM
1

You've got it exactly right, my friend. We set up unfair social constructs ages ago. Then one group of us decided to level out these unfair social constructs by making more balanced constructs for themselves. They didn't stop. Now the playing field is unlevel again. We keep pushing back and forth redefining what is the right or wrong way to treat people of different sexes and ethnicities when none of it is real in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:30 AM
1

One of my mods was meant to make her armor remove able so that I could replace it with much better armor. I'm not really sure how it happened, but I stopped in at Breeze home one day to see her wandering around the house stark naked. In my house. That nudity mod may have made matters worse. But, darn it, underwear can't be that easy for the men and women of Skyrim to come by. Realism!
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:54 AM
7

Seriously? That's where this argument started. Yet you continued to approach it as if the entire act was the male's responsibility. Sex isn't something a man does to a woman.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:03 PM
-2

This girl is my hero.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:22 AM
3

But the post isn't acting in an aggressive manner. What would lead you to believe it is a troll account? He explains it calmly and seriously.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:33 PM
0

That point is hardly the crux of my argument. And I'm sorry if you find things like fact checks or citations boring....but they are kinda integral to journalism.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:35 AM
2

To be completely honest, even though I strongly believe there is a greater feminization of boys and men, in general, in these times. This article is terribly written. There are so many adjective conveying either militant themes or an overabundance of pink fluffy femmyfluff, that it's hard to actually follow what the writer is saying. Not to mention that the subject changes completely, mid-essay, from Wiseman's book to the cracking down on gun-related affects in school. As if, somehow, firearms a…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:50 AM
11

You've summed it all up, here, perfectly.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:16 AM
1

I've posted about this before, but I really wish there a campaign for male body image. I'm a six foot, slender guy with curves at his hips and waist. They are pretty feminine and it's humiliating whenever a girl sees me without a shirt on, much less naked.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:57 PM
4

wow, the downvotes are being quickly delivered, I wonder why is that /r/SRS sends downvote brigades here often.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:43 AM
0

Well, the paper doesn't any valid arguments about a direct causal link between increased porn usage and decreased rape statistics, correct?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:37 AM
1

Yeah, none of the law makers care about that any more.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:20 AM
3

Dirty man slut was asking for it with those whore clothes. The bitch shouldn't have slapped her. /s
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:38 PM
4

I'm with you. Eighty percent of the time if a girl randomly grabbed my ass I'd just be flattered. But that doesn't stop the concept of uninvited sexual pawing from being atrocious. A woman should receive the same hate that a man does for this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:35 PM
1

Well, I didn't mean to imply that I wasn't American, but yes, that was the point I was trying to make. Am I the only one who hates the whole 'Murica' meme?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:36 PM
3

People don't want to be told that what they want to hear is coming from a disreputable source. I'm not being critical of Men's Rights. I'm not a feminist troll. I'm a huge Men's Rights advocate. But sometimes, people on this subreddit do the movement more harm than good. Circlejerking over an anti-domestic violence commercial by claiming it's real, downvoting anyone they don't agree with, etc. etc. Although, this pretty much describes reddit, in general. Also, a lot of redditors are American and…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:44 AM
25

No... it's exactly the point.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:52 PM
-1

Guys, please. When will reddit learn that Dailymail is NOT trustworthy.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:43 PM
3

There are too many comments here treating this gif as if it's live video. This is an anti DV commercial and has been posted here and other places quite a bit. It sends a great message, but it shouldn't exist under the guise of a real life event. I understand that OP didn't know this, but, in my opinion, it should be removed and reposted under the appropriate label. Otherwise it just makes /r/MensRights look like a circlejerk.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:09 AM
4

So it's posing as a fetish site?? That's a little stupid. They are rickrolling people trying to get off. I mean, don't get me wrong, the message is right, but it's aimed at the wrong audience. I mean, Hell, I get off on femdom porn, always have. But that doesn't mean I approve of domestic violence. Violent sexual fantasy and real life violence are not the same things.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:05 AM
6

Thank you. :)
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:31 PM
–

I'm a six foot male, weighing about 175. But I could not feel any worse about my body image. I have curves at my waist that are actually rather feminine. It's embarrassing. No where do I ever see any campaigns presenting a positive body image for males. When that parody of the Dove campaign showed up on reddit a few months ago (Ya know the one where the woman painted pictures of men's balls based on how the man described it to the painter) I commented and sorta jokingly said that I was excited u…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:30 PM
-4

This really depresses me, guys. This world is so terrible in just about every way imaginable. I feel so bad for this man. This woman has fucking ruined his life.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:25 AM
-6

This really depresses me, guys. This world is so terrible in just about every way imaginable. I feel so bad for this man. This woman has fucking ruined his life.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:25 AM
1

Isn't it 99 years?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:03 AM
6

Those women are being objectified and encouraged to have sex with one another. s/
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:32 AM
6

It wouldn't. You can't pay more than 100% of something. Any money you get to pay it would count as income, thus the percentage would stay the same.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:28 PM
1

I'm only 24. Technically still in college, so its not entirely a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:34 AM
1

I've had the exact opposition experience in college. Some classes, the book is useless. The same class with a different teacher, and you use the book every day. Of course, I'm not saying every school is like this, but its certainly not been my experience or the experience of those that I have spoken to about this topic.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:52 PM
19

I don't think anyone here is attacking the teacher or consider her to be a rapist. The attention here is focused on the justice system that seems to give a very light sentence to the defendant, which it wouldn't do if the defendant were male and the "victim" female.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:34 PM
2

She didn't. I'm fact, many of us would defend this type of relationship, as sixteen is not always, but more or less usually old enough for one to make a clear headed decision of consent. The problem here, is that if the sexes were reverse, the defendant would be receiving a much harsher punishment and would be on the receiving end of a lot more negative media scrutiny. Are issue is with the lack of fairness with the law and not necessarily with the relationship itself.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:32 PM
4

Dear God.... I guess this logically makes sense in a society where a woman can have sex with you and then claim you raped her.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:38 PM
1

Downvoting me before looking at her username? Really guys? Really?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:02 PM
8

What can we do to get the word out about this pathetic excuse for a woman to make sure that her award is taken away and that she is fired?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:12 AM
-1

So says the DemonicBtch.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:20 AM
1

I didn't claim that humans weren't animals. There is an obvious difference between humans and tigers. That difference is civilization. Human civilization makes us better than animals.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:32 PM
0

Apple is thd devil for a lot of other reasons too. I'm pretty sure that Apple, Disney, and EA are all owned by the same evil demon.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:01 PM
2

Instinctually, yes, males are programmed to have as many sexual partners as possible, while females are to try to be as nurturing as possible. It's evolution. However, society and culture pushes human beings beyond those basic primal instincts. All humans are better than that, even though we often succumb to those urges. Society does not get to make judgement calls like this. This is hardly a progressive attitude. Its like telling high school kids that they are animals. They can be better than t…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:31 AM
2

Instinctually, yes, males are programmed to have as many sexual partners as possible, while females are to try to be as nurturing as possible. It's evolution. However, society and culture pushes human beings beyond those basic primal instincts. All humans are better than that, even though we often succumb to those urges. Society does not get to make judgement calls like this. This is hardly a progressive attitude. Its like telling high school kids that they are animals. They can be better than t…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:31 AM
1

Right. I think it's pretty likely that he forgot and was just being stupid. It is irresponsible regardless of why it was presented as evidence and maybe I'm harsh, but he should still be tried for falsification of evidence and perjury.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:42 PM
0

A lot of girls I know claim they are Feminists. But the goals, opinions, and attitudes of modern feminism is really more radical than what they align themselves with. So essentially, its how you define feminism. But thats dangerous. To be honest, calling yoursekf a feminist is dangerous, because its too ambiguous. I'm sure that, one day, MRAs won't be in line with the form of Men's Rights of that time. Every bad organization starts out as something good. Once they achieve the equality they are s…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:25 AM
49

Congratulations, Society. You've done your job here.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:20 AM
1

But how many people actually check that?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:57 PM
17

I've never really understood the sex offenders list. We don't make murderers sign a registered homicidal's list. Note, in not saying we should do away with it. Can someone please explain the difference to me? Either way, what warrants being a sex offender needs to be revised. If I piss in an alleyway at 9pm that should not make me equal to a child molester. Hell, even those couples who fuck in public shouldn't be considered sex offenders.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:40 AM
1

Sadly, despite local laws, once they cornered this kid the probably more or less coerced him into admitting he "raped" her. Once that's done, there's little help for him. Poor kid just wanted to have sex. The US needs to learn that humans love sex and teens love sex. Telling them not to do it till they're ready may help some kids, but it's not going to stop human nature. Eh l-life finds a-a way.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 05:52 PM
12

That's not the point.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:54 AM
14

Right. I had a gf who was two years younger than me when I was 17 and while we never had sex, I was certainly worried her crazy mother would start shit. Punishing teenagers for having a relationship is fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:54 AM
2

That's true. And it doesn't really matter. But if the sign said the reverse would it still be there?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:06 PM
2

How the fuck does this piece of shit have so many upvotes?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:18 AM
27

Society has spent so much time making it easier and more possible for a single mother to succeed that no one has bothered to do the same for single fathers.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:57 AM
4

This isn't one of those cases where OP is grasping at straws to "complain". If these were just random articles by different authors then I would pass it over (I've seen stuff like that in this sub). However this clearly shows an unhealthy bias towards woman in the media. Good find OP. This sort of "subconscious writing" is something we should be bringing to people's attention.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:35 PM
1

To be fair, it wasn't really trolling. It was a call to take more action instead of just discussing.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:26 AM
1

No one would disagree with that. Stealing does more harm than indecent exposure. But does that make it a sexual offense?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:56 AM
3

I dunno...if you started seeing them everywhere...don't you think it would at least help raise awareness? I mean, Hell, before I actually did a literal search on reddit for this sub, I didn't know there WAS a men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:25 AM
3

I agree totally. Tell that to the folks at AskReddit.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:14 AM
26

Of course. She had an unhappy breakup, deciding to fuck over her new ex-boyfriend, and started placing ads for someone to make it look like she had been attacked. She claims it's the boyfriend...and he has "motivation" because they were assumedly in a fight earlier in the day.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:43 AM
1

But if you think it's murder, then it's not their body that you're saying you don't have a right to say what they can do with. It's the body of their child. I'm not arguing my opinion of abortion. I'm arguing your opinion.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:02 AM
1

So, as a friendly question, have you learned anything?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:59 PM
1

Try not to slap her back...but get a little physical and ask her what the hell.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:49 PM
2

What I don't get is why it's necessary for him to pay for the test. She is the one who will be seeking child support from whomever the father is. She had sex with two different men within a close time frame. OP has no influence over how many potential fathers to this child are. She shouldn't be able to press for child support unless she knows who the father is and in order for her to know that, she should have a test done. It shouldn't be that he has to pay for the test to defend himself against…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:43 PM
5

Her son was just likely being a kid. Kids are asses. She's acting more childish than her son was though because she's an adult. Some example she's setting.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:30 PM
11

Just reported it to Kickstarter and sent the creator a message, as well. I advise everyone to report this, who has a Kickstarter account, as this is at travesty whether or not it pertains to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:28 PM
0

Hate to say it but I agree with you. The closest thing about it bein a men's issue is that the mother will force her sons to apologize to strangers for something they haven't done and for being kids, basically. And that's not really an issue in itself. Just an annoying sexist concept the mother is forcing on her children. She's a grade A dumb bitch all around.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:11 PM
-2

The next time a woman turns me down I'm gonna punch her in the face. Just kidding.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:30 AM
-1

But this post doesn't point to any anti-MRA ideas or any radical feminist views.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:47 AM
0

I never said that all feminists are extremists.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:46 AM
2

It's just speaking the truth.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:45 AM
1

How is it negative?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:12 AM
-3

Don't downvote him. He's right. Whenever a minority has a organization that caters special needs to them, that organization will continue to give them special treatment after equality has been met...It happened with Feminism and it's happened with other minority groups. I have no problems with groups like the NAACP, but there should be an organization that advances "non-colored people", to be it as bluntly as that organizations name does.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:04 AM
8

How? It's showing the attitude that Feminism takes. The point of it is fairly obvious.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:57 AM
2

It's not a good thing. It implies that true racism or sexism only applies to one race or sex.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:24 AM
1

It's that way here, in America, too.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:41 AM
3

I've never heard that before. I think you may have misinterpreted the meaning.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:28 AM
8

As a kid I never understood why people said reverse sexism. I didn't realize that people phrase it that way to indicate that sexism against females is the only type of sexism the matters. It always bugged me as a child.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:28 AM
3

Demonizing men for having human desires is the stupidest thing imaginable. Women have sexual desires just as men do. Women stare and ogle men just as much as men do the same to women. And they are no more perverts or sexists for doing so than men are. We're all fucking human. Sex is a human experience. I don't understand why anyone acts as though healthy sexual urges are a disgusting thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:36 AM
5

Wait...there's an international Women's Day? Edit: Just learned there's a Men's Day too. I think we should combine them into Humanity Day!
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:11 PM
0

You're a jewel.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:34 PM
1

I agree on this one issue.....but I still think having cameras everywhere is a bad idea. Private property? That's fine.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:50 PM
41

Thats what I was thinking. The evidence is on fucking camera. There is proof that these girls attempted to ruin his reputation and his life. That seems like plenty evidence to me.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:49 PM
1

The non-radical feminists and the non-radical MRAs should get together and go start our own rights group! With blackjack! And hookers! Oh yeah, wait, no memes. Sorry.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:17 PM
2

You will never be able to stop foolish people from damaging your name by doing foolish things in your name. It's just not possible. Why don't you stop the radical feminists from doing the same? It's just not possible to "get them to stop". Men and women are crazy. This thread has exhausted me. I'm almost ready to disown this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:05 PM
2

It's very obviously photoshopped. Whatever was originally on the card was erased and replaced.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:00 PM
1

Thank you for being so...calm and rational when dealing with this fool. People like him is what sets the radical Feminists off on us, in the first place. Perhaps we thing the rad fems make propagandic claims like this more than the mra's, but if that is true then it is only because feminism is a MUCH more widely recognized movement. Again, thanks for even being here to research, learn, and talk instead of not even trying to get to know us. I hope idiots won't discolor your opinion of all of us.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:51 PM
5

Thats a bit extreme....she did wrong. And the response she got in this link is ridiculous. She should be a registered sex offender. It's sick that she can get away with this with not even a scolding...but we shouldn't wish her to commit suicide. Suicide is no joke. Many people have been close to that vein of thinking and it's a scary place. The girl doesn't deserve to die, especially considering how regretful she is. She deserves to be given the same sentence a male would be given in a similar c…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:34 AM
1

That is true, in the US. The above said this occurred in the UK, so only someone familiar with the law across the pond could tell you.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 01:19 PM
5

Not really. I would give anything to have the institution done away with. Truly, it's an abomination. Bringing women into it would only escalate public hatred for the draft and probably bring it's demise around that much sooner. Secondly, this may sound "petty", but it is sexist and unfair that, in the meantime, only men are eligible for the draft.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:10 AM
3

Right. That's your experience. And it's a great way to handle having been abused. But not all people of are the mental and emotional fortitude to accomplish such training. It isn't the same for everybody.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:31 AM
1

I do agree. But OP indicates she is a feminist and probably knows better than we do her past behavior regarding males. This is probably not the best example of her behavior and attitude. But if anyone were walking behind me creepily I would be unnerved, as well, and I am male. Her last statement, however, gives me a good indication of her "opinions".
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:38 AM
28

Who says we haven't?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:04 AM
2

But if a woman cheats on a man, she is exercising her independence as a woman.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:18 AM
5

While it does seem that it become unlikely, if you're male, it is a frightening prospect. It CAN happen. I don't mean to say that it's likely, but I still don't like that I am forced into signing up for this because I am male. The women of America are completely spared from this. In a pre-women's lib society, it was a bit more understandable. But if a woman has all the same rights as a man, then she should be forced to serve her government in all the same ways as men are.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:13 AM
2

However, my statement about college being a money scam still stands lol
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:51 AM
1

I noticed my error in another comment. I'm not spreading a rumor. And where does the adjective lazy come from?? Note how I said "as I understand it". I was wrong.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:49 AM
1

Or...maybe I was wrong, lol.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:03 AM
-4

All it takes is one B, from what I understand. That's a huge risk, when you have to pay back EVERYTHING that the GI bill has paid for. Our college education system is a big crooked racket.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:02 AM
5

Hell, all you have to be is a janitor at a school! I did some part time work a couple of years ago, because the church I went to (also a daycare) needed some help and I had some time. Parents always asked who I was, though I was obviously pushing a dust mop around, sweeping, or mopping the floor. What the Hell did they think I was? These weren't high school females, they were 3-8 year old boys and girls. I barely had any interaction with them at all. Maybe it's just me, but a 21 year old male ha…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:53 AM
2

I would make her talk about it. Seems like she's avoiding the topic because she knows it's wrong of her, but is being selfish (and childish) and wants to continue receiving free phone service. Good luck, man. I know it must not be easy being put in such a position like this. It's not easy walking away from someone, but hopefully you'll have no problem deciding to when or if the time comes.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:20 AM
2

Thank you. Have you let her know how you feel? If it were me, I'd do everything possible to save that guy's reputation and 'life'...if threatening to leave her accomplished that, I wouldn't think twice.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:13 AM
0

I know what it's like to love someone and not want to leave them.....but Jesus, she's fucking someone's live over because she will have to pay for her phone if she refuses. I wouldn't be able to be with a person like that.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:09 AM
4

It says she was convicted of assault.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter