| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Digging DeniedYeah I said "Obviously if he was hiding these gifts, he was giving to his mom, from his wife its a different legal story." Pretty clearly that is me saying it would be fraud if you we're hiding these purchases from your partner. But idk how you would hide massive gifts to your mother without your spouse knowing lol. Especially when he started doing it before they were even married. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/04/23 12:36 AM |
| 1 | Gold Digging DeniedYes that's exactly what I said. Seems like we agree. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/04/23 09:16 PM |
| 2 | Gold Digging DeniedSo you want someone who earned the money, looked after the money (in your scenario of lack of knowledge and consent on the wife's part, she clearly has never looked into or taken care of the family finances), and didn't break their marriage vows to have to provide proof so that he doesn't have to give his ex wife money that he doesn't own? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/04/23 10:53 AM |
| 2 | Gold Digging DeniedPretty sure she would've had to complain and refuse her consent at the time of donation/gifting. Cant just retroactively say that she didnt consent to any if his gifts over the whole course of their marriage. Obviously if he was hiding these gifts, he was giving to his mom, from his wife its a different legal story. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/04/23 01:55 AM |
| 4 | Gold Digging DeniedI'm pretty sure you'd have to divorce them at the time of the gifting. The income is community property and thus belong to both partners equally. But one spouse decides to gift a large sum of money away, I don't believe that it stays community property at that point. The wife could probably take him to court over the most recent donation that she can state she didnt approve of, and divorce him in the process, but I don't believe you can take back half ownership of gifts that have already been gi… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/04/23 01:53 AM |
| 16 | So when it happens to a man it’s fine, but when it happens to a woman...Just stepping back and thinking logically it doesn't make any sense. If the pay gap were true, the most successful companies would be staffed by nearly entirely women. Saving 30% on payroll would lead these companies to be the most profitable very quickly. I've never heard an argument that disproves why the top companies wouldn't be 99% women staffed if the pay gap were true. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 09/09/22 04:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter