TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Automatic-Sun-9386 Archive

View 5 posts and 32 comments by Automatic-Sun-9386 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Like I said, I understand where those feelings come from but that doesn't mean I agree with the misguided conclusions. Bigots will always find specious ways to justify their bigotry. If you'r set on clinging on to that bigotry or flagellating yourself over some ill concceived notion that you bear some sort of original sin, I can't stop you. But I will not pass that horrible lesson onto my son.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 08:43 AM
15

Saying "I can see why misandry exists" is one thing. That's understanding how people's feelings are formed without agreeing with the conclusions or condoning actions. But I completely reject that "Men have earn their crowd of haters" I didn't earn any hate just because I happen to share the genitalia of some asshole who wronged a woman.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:02 AM
13

The people who always love to talk about "challenging" "dismantling" or "disrupting" things always talk like it's their own inane views that have never been callenged. She sounds so full of herself.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 07:04 PM
7

Ok sure, if you want to be right that badly.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 05:13 PM
9

Semantics. In your first paragraph are saying the same thing as me but different words. As for the second...I am sure that's not what she meant.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 05:02 PM
32

Interesting choice of words. By saying men need to "evolve" she's implying we are primitive and women are more advanced, therefore superior.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 01:40 PM
20

Quite illuminating how these kinds of people, who purport to be open-minded and love to bloviate about how much they hate bigotry, rationalise their prejudice just like the racists they claim to despise.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:25 AM
21

This is great. It makes me think of that overrated, facile monologue from Barbie, basically about how being a woman is like walking a tightrope. The mistake lies in feminists thinking it's an experience unique to women, when actually it is unique to humans. We are all on a tightrope, some of us try to keep our balance, others tip over without realising an some don't even bother.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 04:52 PM
3

yeah best to steer clear of dishonest political hacks like these.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:18 PM
10

Of course, the more fringe opinions by definition won't be widely held. But still there is a lot of casual misandry in the mainstream, things that would never be tolerated if they were said about women. Do you disagree?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 12:38 PM
10

Do you know what "anecdotal" means?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 09:24 AM
3

Omg, like, literally?
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:08 PM
-2

Oh, so he was an ignorant dupe. That makes it better. And then you go and say "you propagandists" without a hint of irony.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 12:07 PM
3

I understood what you said, I still disagree. I never said women had perfectly equal influence either, but they still had more influence than feminism claims they had, enough to have their say. Maybe I'm wrong but initial comments do suggest imposition rather than negotiation (even if not from a place of absolute equality). Just as an example, do you think women were "excluded" from taking part in war, or is it possible it was a mutually agreed and sensible decision that men be in charge of secu…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:19 PM
7

Well, you are actually. You're saying men (in the past) are the cause of modern societal gender ills, and the solution is feminism. This genders both the problem (patriarchy) and the solution (feminism). This opens the door for very simplistic and childish narratives. The reality is, in my opinion, much more nuanced. I reject the premise that this "structure" was set up by men alone. If we're talking about which demographic had more leverage when negotiating the social contract, the more sensibl…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 10:18 AM
15

Ah, The easy narrative: The problems are male, the solutions are female.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 10:01 AM
2

Senator Character to Jedi character: “It’s only a matter of time before one of you snaps, and when that happens who will be able to stop HIM” The pronoun choice was very much deliberate. That's just the most overt example.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 12:31 PM
16

10% is not enough to do all the dirty and dangerous jobs feminists are not interested in doing.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 07:04 AM
-1

That's a bit harsh, I wouldn't say I feel "confident" or even wholly ignorant about it. Recently I had to take my toddler to the doctor because he was starting to get balanitis, so I definitely do not miss that, or having to worry about regularly cleaning it. If sex is much better with it, then perhaps I am missing out but hard to say how much.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 03:22 PM
0

Instead of downvoting, why not just tell what I said that you disagree with.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:19 PM
-6

To be honest, I don't resent being circumcised and I don't miss my foreskin. Maybe I don't know what I was deprived of, but it doesn't feel like I was robbed of something. Just my opinion.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 10:03 AM
1

Speaking as someone who was sexually assaulted as a boy, I wonder what these people would choose if given the option between being murdered and being raped.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 02:22 PM
6

This isn't even violence. I could at least understand an ad campaign about sexual assault, but the fact that the government decided a campaign is needed to scold *only* men for sending too many text messages or telling their girlfriends they don't like what they're wearing is infuriating. The state has no business getting involved in things like that.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 12:01 PM
2

Haha well put.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 05:51 PM
12

I enjoy some of Will Ferrell's comedies and can separate his work from his opinions, but the man has three sons. There should be be a special place in hell for the parent of boys saying things like that.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 12:38 PM
2

I definitely reject some of the reactions in this comment section, and I also know that opining on a SO's wardrobe choices can cross a line in a manner that's coercive and controlling. The ad however does not make clear where that line is. And why are men being singled out for this finger wagging when women do it plenty as well, and why does the government feel like women need to be protected from this behaviour? I thought women were strong and independent and can stand up for themselves, but ap…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 10:27 AM
31

I could honestly learn to ignore it but I have a young son now I hate to see him grow up in a place where he will be made to feel faulty for who he is.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 09:03 PM
2

Because she had no real power to decide policy. The prime ministers mostly did that.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 04:16 PM
-1

overuse of the word literally is the bane of the internet.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 12:28 PM
11

Have they said that? That's laughable, by definition it excludes them in the name. And any time an objection is voiced to campaigns like these the usual chants of "this proves why we need this" or "don't be so defensive"
/r/MensRights09/02/26 05:53 PM
3

Te quejas de “strawmanning” (cosa que no hice) y luego sales con tu propio hombrecito de paja. No me chingues. El hecho que hayas nacido en México es irrelevante.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 08:11 AM
1

In Mexico, feminists get very upset when you point out the murder rate for men is exponentially higher, but they say this is not as horrible as far fewer women being murderer because we are inherently violent and die in fights and shootouts, and claim men are not murdered for being men, but women are.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 10:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter