Available_Object8597 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Why do women claim they are being used for sex once a man realizes he is incompatible with her? Holy crap. 50+? Are you even able to walk after that?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 07:56 PM
1	Why do women claim they are being used for sex once a man realizes he is incompatible with her? Genuinely curious: how does a man make that experience good for you? Is it just by agreeing to do the things you listed and enjoying them?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 06:42 PM
1	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? That's not what I'm talking about. Lysa_Bell argued that there is something creepy about fucking your robot girlfriend if it loses its memory. I agreed with that, while also thinking that it's an interesting situation, since the robot is still technically just an object. But by making the robot your partner, you've essentially humanized it, so not treating it like a human feels disgusting and immoral.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 08:02 PM
2	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? Yeah you're not wrong. I'd like to think, maybe naively, that it's mostly edgy words and memes, but there is definitely at least a part of them who wouldn't care even in real life.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 02:21 PM
1	Sexualization Vs Objectification As someone already pointed out, objectification is just unwanted sexualization. If a man masturbates to a picture of a woman, he is necessarily objectifying her - there is no interaction taking place for her to be a subject in the situation. Whether or not the woman, if she finds out about this, appreciates that (the vast majority off women won't, of course), will determine if she'll view it as objectification.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 11:36 AM
1	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? I meant that there shouldn't be a difference with the robot, technically, before and after the memory wipe, not that there shouldn't be a difference between the robot and the wife.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 10:23 AM
1	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? Sure, but I was responding to your point about the risk of memory wipe. I think the experienced loss in that case is comparable. It's interesting though, because ultimately, the robot is always an object. So in a technical sense, there should't be a difference. But I agree that it is instinctively creepy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 10:02 AM
1	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? No. I asked, is it consequentially much different for the man? Meaning, the outcomes are similar in the sense that they result in the man losing his partner. So both situations involve a risk (either being divorced/broken up with or the AI having some sort of memory wipe).	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 09:49 AM
1	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? Another pro is that with a robot, no human is being hurt. A lot of sexworkers, besides being victims of human trafficking, have histories of SA and other horrific stuff. Many of them even use their "profession" as a way of self-harming. So in that regard I'd say a robot is preferable.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 08:27 AM
2	Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? Women already initiate the majority of divorces. Is that consequentially much different from the AI forgetting you? In both cases, your partner is lost.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/05/26 08:17 AM