| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why do women claim they are being used for sex once a man realizes he is incompatible with her?Holy crap. 50+? Are you even able to walk after that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/26 07:56 PM |
| 1 | Why do women claim they are being used for sex once a man realizes he is incompatible with her?Genuinely curious: how does a man make that experience good for you? Is it just by agreeing to do the things you listed and enjoying them? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/26 06:42 PM |
| 2 | Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women?Yeah you're not wrong. I'd like to think, maybe naively, that it's mostly edgy words and memes, but there is definitely at least a part of them who wouldn't care even in real life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 02:21 PM |
| 1 | Sexualization Vs ObjectificationAs someone already pointed out, objectification is just unwanted sexualization. If a man masturbates to a picture of a woman, he is necessarily objectifying her - there is no interaction taking place for her to be a subject in the situation. Whether or not the woman, if she finds out about this, appreciates that (the vast majority off women won't, of course), will determine if she'll view it as objectification. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 11:36 AM |
| 1 | Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women?Sure, but I was responding to your point about the risk of memory wipe. I think the experienced loss in that case is comparable. It's interesting though, because ultimately, the robot is always an object. So in a technical sense, there should't be a difference. But I agree that it is instinctively creepy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 10:02 AM |
| 1 | Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women?No. I asked, is it consequentially much different for the man? Meaning, the outcomes are similar in the sense that they result in the man losing his partner. So both situations involve a risk (either being divorced/broken up with or the AI having some sort of memory wipe). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 09:49 AM |
| 1 | Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women?Another pro is that with a robot, no human is being hurt. A lot of sexworkers, besides being victims of human trafficking, have histories of SA and other horrific stuff. Many of them even use their "profession" as a way of self-harming. So in that regard I'd say a robot is preferable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 08:27 AM |
| 2 | Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women?Women already initiate the majority of divorces. Is that consequentially much different from the AI forgetting you? In both cases, your partner is lost. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/26 08:17 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter