TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Avakaaya-karam Archive

View 1 post and 284 comments by Avakaaya-karam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No but in every workplace the women are with people outside of office, but the majority of men in offices are single and rarely in relationships with women either in the office or outside of the office.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 09:45 AM
4

Because as I said it's the same scenario outside of University as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 04:05 AM
11

No, you quite down, hore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:53 AM
11

Why do you say people? When it's mostly just women who do such things? Yes women can indeed date outside of their colleges, but the same situation is also seen when these men reach the work place. More men are single even in the workplace than there are women. And don't get me started on workplace romances. Women rarely ever get with men in the same position as themselves they go for the one that is immediate higher up or the boss of the boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:43 AM
5

Ahh yes, the good ole method of rejecting the entire stat when called out. How would you suggest they collect data then?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:37 AM
7

That's what I mean. In the next age group the difference should stay the same or women should be wayyyyyyy higher than men unfortunately that is not what's happening. For the next age group regardless of 30's or 40's the % of people in relationship is almost equal/similar. There aren't any older single women to balance out the single young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:33 AM
3

That's the thing. For this to be true there has got to be 70% of women as single when they are older. But that's not what's happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:29 AM
10

You do realise that the situation is almost similar in any university except for highly reputed ones right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 03:22 AM
1

Because even in 2023 majority of the workforce is still men. That's how it is possible. Also you are not marrying only once in life. Plenty of people are marrying multiple times in their lifetime. The majority of "working women" are barely working at all or working part time jobs. And most quit after having a child. Now should they quit after having a child? NO.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:50 AM
1

I agree that gender wage gap exists but not that far different for each gender. But where did I said that women are marrying someone in the same position as them? More often than not even if in same workplace women marry people that are 1-3 positions higher than themselves. A fresher job holder would get with senior, a senior employee would get with manager, a mangr would get with regional manager etc. Women dating in same position also indeed exists but more often than not they would mostly onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 11:24 PM
5

Almost everything that exists in 1959 was still there in 2022. But they were absolutely not showcasing everything from 1959 to 2022 but only the mirror world of times in 2023. If it was from 1959 the there would be male type writers and fax machines and telegrams. Just because there exists a driver both in 1959 and in 2022 doesn't mean they showcased everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 02:16 AM
4

No, it covered and stated that it's a mirror or real life for the present. Not for the past 200 years but for the present. If the technology and the setting was in 1950's then there wouldn't be any issue as that would be apt. But if they are showcasing mirror of present world then they should show it as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 01:58 AM
0

Ofcourse I admit it. Is the big dick good? Absolutely. Is it the only thing that matters? No. Does have it make up for lots of stuff also yes. Can it be compensated easily ? Also yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 08:27 AM
0

Literally nothing can compensate for the lack of foreplay and enthusiasm to make your partner orgasm and have a good time. There are alternatives for even big dick like toys and sleeves but there is no alternative for foreplay and attentiveness. The 7 in will be useless if the other person with 6.3 gives her a variety of sizes and most importantly values his partner more than his insecurity of size that he is willing to try different methods with different sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 07:58 AM
1

Isn't it the same back in thier own country as well? If you think women in America or UK don't want money from these kind of men then you are highly mistaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:33 PM
1

Not if the man has wealth and is accepted by women's family
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:15 PM
7

Or women who are pissed of at such men who opt for younger and more feminine women from other places. Either one of those two.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:13 PM
3

The liberal and modern women in 3rd world countries and in countries like USA/UK are completely different things. Thier liberal means being able to work and take thier own life decisions here liberal means being allowed to have tinder onn mobile to "make friends" even after getting in to a relationship and then calling men controlling when they ask you not to do such things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 07:12 PM
2

It's not earning less but not earning at all. Majority of these stats where women earn more that you think are coming from women whose husbands are not earning at all due to various reasons like studying again, shifting jobs into new fields, talking a break etc. Majority of the women would not even consider a man as a sexual prospect to settle with if the probability of him earning less than her as less forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:39 PM
2

Absolutely and the same applies to that as well but 100x more a there are tons of rallies and movements to help women move from the traditional kitchen role and have her place outside but not a single movement to help men who actually want to be house husband or acceptance of men who earn less. There has also never been less pressure than now on women to be confined to the kitchen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:32 PM
4

I agree that there has never been less pressure than now to contribute money to household but the pressure is still wayyyyyyyyu higher than women, and if the man is not as contributing to house then unless he looks really good he wouldn't even be in the dating market. Yes the pressure is less but unless they are if higher status they wouldn't even be provided the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 06:20 PM
8

The problem is that despite all the "equality" movements it is still majorly in the man to be the higher bread winner. Majority of the women that work marry those who are in atleast 2 positions higher than them. And the worse part is that this equality never seems be in place when the blame game starts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 04:13 AM
1

Mostly the ones who have the privilege are the ones with more options in a relationship well make mostly women are the ones saying no to such things. Yet majority of women are experts in keeping track of such data like what did he do fir valentine's 5 years ago, how much effort should I keep that is equal to his, how many times he took me out on a date etc. It's not the data that's wrong, it's what the data is used for that decides whether it is correct or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:56 AM
0

You are comparing different things. In the first case you were comparing the reason for usage not the amount. And when they did compare the amount, it was between men and women but not single and married women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 05:21 PM
1

Where did you find the link that equal number of married people and single people use antidepressants?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 04:54 PM
4

But the difference is that single women post 45 make 58% meaning the rest 42% make up all three other categories, married women, married men and single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:05 PM
3

It's not a bug, it's a feature is basically what you are saying while staring right at the critical bug.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:19 PM
1

A little higher/lower is not a different place. The post was implying it to be in a different place that is like to the side or below vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 12:30 PM

Good. that means in those 1/3rd of marriages men will have to contribute more towards house works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 10:02 PM

Lol, If they are contributing 45% of financial expenses then they only have to do 55% of house work. Feel better? It feel like you are less interested in having a rational convo and more interested in personal insults and gripping straws.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 10:00 PM

I'm literally doing everything on my own and was doing all my dishes and laundry since I was a teenager. I even contributes to paying rent and other expenses at my parents house as soon as I started earning many years ago. And I still send a part of my paycheck to them to help thier financial burdens. I literally kept saying none of what i said is a stead fast rule but only a blueprint of what a fair and equal relationship would look like. You are more than welcome to leech off of a man by not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:58 PM

Absolutely they should do it in accordance with the percentage of financial contribution they are doing. If they are doing only 20% of financial contribution they should naturally be doing 80% of house work. Now this is not a hard fast rule but blueprint on which a fair and equal relationship should be built on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 09:42 PM

And that just means they are neither contributing financially not through house work in the relationship. Just like there are men who contribute neighter financially not through house chores there are also women who contribute neither through house work not through financial matter. Unfair marriages do exist in this world. Those teachers, social workers and child care workers are more than welcome to marry someone who works just as much as then and demand that thier partner help them out equally…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 07:34 PM

So basically you view those who earn less than you as beneath yourself? Glad to know why you are arguing from that perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 06:51 PM

It is also very well documented in how many men who actually do earn more than women would also still leave or cheat. You are just using it as an excuse to push forward a narrative that will benefit you and cover up your shallow nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 06:31 PM

Most women are also not that great in provider role hence why you see so many women divorce as soon as they start earning more and why women rarely ever go to men that earn less than them. Most women would just go for people on higher status than themselves and raise their own status by forcing "equality" on them. Men also do this but it's mostly women who do such stupid shit and then call it oppression or some other stupid shit. If you know you are being with someone if higher status and power …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 06:14 PM
1

What the hell are you doing in such a wretched place? Go Have a normal life with your gentle and caring husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 12:24 PM
6

Dude, clitoris is in the same spot of vagina for all women. It's not in some mysterious spots. Just like different sizes of dicks there are differents shapes and sizes for clitoris and labia but they are all in same spot for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 12:22 PM

Yes, some. The issue with this is you are assuming all higher earner are top management which is flase. More often than not, the higher earner in middle class families which make up most of population is also working as hard as they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 05:17 AM

I agree time is worth more than money for those that have the said money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:58 AM

Glad we can agree on something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:57 AM

I absolutely don't get why you keep bringing your anecdotal examples into this. I'm talking about logic here and rules on which the relationship should be built on. Are you saying you are ok with a husband /wife as long as they look after themselves and house and pet sits who occasionally mows ? If so then that's your opinion. One that is not based on logic but preferences. Also even in such scenarios she is looking after herself, isn't she? Doesn't the same thing also be applied to a marriage t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:56 AM

Absolutely agree on this but these are the exceptions rather than the norm. It would absolutely be unfair to ask the one with a 12 hour shift everyday to do more at home than the one working 8 everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:52 AM

Does that women expect a roommate to look after her expenses like a child if the roommate is earning more?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:50 AM

Glad we can agree on something then. As long as a couple is contributing equally in one way or other then it's all logical and proper.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:48 AM

Doesn't make it any more valid than flat earthers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:47 AM

And $100 is $100 for both man and a women. $100 on weekday when you are working and have less free time wouldn't become $1000 on weekend when you are not working and have more free time. If we talking about Ideal relationship then both partners would be providing equally in both financial matters and house chores responsibilities and during raising kids. It's not that it's only ideal for time but not money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:46 AM

And if the women is the one earning more than man then she has every right to demand the man do most of the chores in house. But that's the thing most women are still only going after those who earn more than them. The fault is in the choices of women selection not in logic. A good self respecting and responsible partner would also not demand thier partner share 50% of house work despite one contributing much more to house expenses. I'm not talking about "sometimes" I'm talking about the general…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:42 AM

And if the women is the one earning more than man then she has every right to demand the man do most of the chores in house. But that's the thing most women are still only going after those who earn more than them. The fault is in the choices of women selection not in logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:39 AM

Absolutely agree. As long as women choose men who are earning a similar wage to them they have all the rights to demand the man also contribute equally to house chores since they are contributing equally to house expenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:36 AM

Absolutely agree. Nothing is ideal. But money/financial contribution is one of the only quality whose pros faar outweigh t the cons in such scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:34 AM

And you are living in an unfair arrangement where it hugely benefits the grad student. Just because you have the means to afford it doesn't mean everybody does. I agree there is zero excuse for a grown man or women to revert to child ina. Romantic or sexual relationship so they should all contribute to 50% of equal financial and house chores responsibilities. As long as women choose men who are earning just as much as then then there is absolutely no issues with them asking the men to contribute…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:33 AM

So there is a gender wage gap, just the opposite of what's being told. Well ist expected given how much special focus and movements there are to hire women than men by giving them special diversity quotas and privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:30 AM

Lol, literally almost all the comments in this post are saying the one who is earning most should also contribute equally to house work. That's literally taking them for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:28 AM

You can virtue signal all you want but that is not how it works. One has to give more focus and prioritize work in order to climb the ladder regardless if men or women. Well if you are content with a low worker or avg middle class as long as they also help with hosur work then that great you do you. But as time goes the money will rarely be enough for the family. That's when the issue starts to occur. But just because one person is contributing more to work than house doesn't mean these issues w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:27 AM

You seem to miss understand me. I'm talking about purely normal before kids couple. Obviously time of a mother who raised kids and is also handling all of the house chores is more valuable than a normal office job holder man. And vice versa even if genders are reversed. If a women is the sole worker in house and husband is the one taking care of kids and house works then his time is also more valuable than just the wife. In a marriage almost always kids come first. Just don't take the sole earne…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:23 AM

Is that so? Then why whine about what percentage one contributes to house works or what percentage one contributes to financial responsibilities? They are not transactional right? So is it perfectly fine even if the wife/husband contributes 0% to both house works and financial responsibilities?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:20 AM

Absolutely agree. Just like each person is responsible for their own expenses. Adults should earn all of their expenses and behave exactly as they did when alone and exactly as they did when with roommates. As long as they are full filling atleast 50% of entire house expenses they shouldn't be held responsible for more than 50% of house works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:18 AM

Absolutely. But that's is how it works if you wanna ask who should do more. In a healthy relationship wife could not do house chores at all and still be in a full filling relationship with her husband at the same time she could be the only one doing almost all of the house works and still be fulfilled with her husband. You or me don't get to judge what is healthy and what is unhealthy for others. The only think we can judge on is logical and transactional relationship where such points matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:15 AM

Who else do you think would take care of the house when he/she would love alone? And even if they hire a maid that still comes under their own name cuz it's through their money that this is happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:12 AM

And that is your wish to do so. But in terms of purely logical matters the person earning less unless they belong to a specific high stress jobs like nurses, stock market brokers, doctors, engineers etc should be the one contributing to most of the house work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 03:11 AM

You can control a looot of things, doesn't mean they should be forced to do them. If you can't control how much you earn then live according to your earning means and contribute in a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:33 AM

If you are a responsible adult who has some self-respect, then YES.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:32 AM

Absolutely. Nothing is perfect. Both hours worked and financial contribution to house should be considered when dividing house chores it's just that financial contribution is wayyyyy more important than the hours worked. And money is the only quality whose pros far outweigh cons when considered in such situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:24 AM

Even working hours are not a proper measure. A clerk or accountant and a lawyer/doctor/stock market broker even if they work similar hours it would take huge toll of physical and mental health if the individual working in later Field. Money is the only good quantitative measure in such scenarios. If you contributing to household more through financial means then you should be be held to same responsibilities as your significant other when it comes to house chores. Similarly if you are contributi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:21 AM
1

But is she also following all the things you mentioned is the real question here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:20 AM

But even working hours are not proper measure. A clerk or accountant and a lawyer/doctor/stock market broker even if they work similar hours it would take huge toll of physical and mental health if the individual working in later Field. Money is the only good quantitative measure in such scenarios. If you contributing to household more through financial means then you should be be held to same responsibilities as your significant other when it comes to house chores. Similarly if you are contribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:17 AM

Just because a women is putting in more time into caring for hosur doesn't mean she is entitled to not contributing 50% of financial burden into the house expenses that she is living the lifestyle of. See how stupid this sounds?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:15 AM

Not for all its not. Time if an accountant is not the same as time for a stock market broker/doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:13 AM

So basically gender wage gap is a myth? Thank you for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:11 AM

Nurse is literally the only exception to this that is gender specific to women. The majority of heavy burden jobs like doctors, construction workers, engineers, lawyers etc are dominated by men. I agree with what you said but only and only for nurse jobs because that is an exception. If a women is working as a doctor/lawyer/stock market broker or construction worker then that should also definitely be considered. Working hours and financial contribution bith should be considered when distributio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:10 AM

Absolutely. If both are earning a similar amount and contributing similarly to household (if one has significant high loans then that should also be considered unless it's like house loan where they getting rent or something) then both gotta put in similar effort in house work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:05 AM

Exactly. Do you now see the perspective from the other side when you apply the same logic? The high earner is working much harder and earning much more through her/his office working hours than the other but still be expected to contribute to 50% house work? Isn't that also equally unfair? There are always exceptions like nurse jobs where the pay is very less but the work load is humongous but those are rather exceptions rather than the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 02:03 AM

But even working hours are not proper measure. A clerk or accountant and a lawyer/doctor/stock market broker even if they work similar hours it would take huge toll of physical and mental health if the individual working in later Field. Money is the only good quantitative measure in such scenarios. If you contributing to household more through financial means then you should be be held to same responsibilities as your significant other when it comes to house chores. Similarly if you are contribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 01:58 AM

Because not everyone is like that forever. And they is exactly my point. Majority of people who do this while they are single would not do this when they are commited. See how thier behavior is different from when they are single and commited. It would only be an issue when they do not while commited. Now if you talking about drugs that a lengthy issue that I myself also agree with unfortunately the majority of world doesn't think that way as most still do such stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 12:15 AM

But that's the thing. There are 100's of other unwritten rules like this. You don't sit before a relationship and talk about stuff like "dont do ecstasy and crash at your opposite gendered friends place or go on a long trip with them. It's expected behavior from most monogamous relationships. If they have to state each and everything then it will start to feel like a Hassel and nobody would get into relationships anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:55 PM

People actions change when they are single and when they are committed. But I do agree that expectations should be stated before getting too deep into the relationship though. Partying and doing drugs like molly and ecstasy with your opposite gender friends and crashing at their place wouldn't be much of an issue when you are single but that shit wouldn't fly when the person is committed. I genuinely don't understand how this concept is so hard to grasp for others.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:51 PM

Obviously if your solution to every issue in a relationship ship is to break up then your stupid anology works. If A and B are in a relationship and B has an issue with something that a does then b is more than welcome to break up immediately but that's not how relationship are supposed to be. You are supposed to communicate with each other and try to reach a compromise of sorts. But y'all start larping and saying stuff like is B is controlling and manipulative as soon as B says that she wants A…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:48 PM

The behavior of a person that is single and one that is committed would and should obviously be different. Something that is acceptable when they are single will not be acceptable when they are commited. Those are two different worlds. Getting drunk till 4 am with your male besties or female besties wouldn't matter much when you are a single but that shit wouldn't fly when you are in a commited relationship. Also wtf you mean if you are going to date me then you can't dress or act a certain way …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:43 PM
3

Perfect. This is like the female version of beta bux. I hope whoever read your comment actually understands why noone want to the guy whom women settle with in their 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:16 PM
13

But that's the thing. For men it's already known factor and more popularly termed as Madonna-hore complex. Everyone knows that men are bad. But nobody is willing to even acknowledge how women do the same or worse things but always are kept at pedestal while they talk shit like personality us what matters the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 09:13 PM
1

Wtf, who would want to go to the shittiest bar? You are reallllllly looking down on men and that's a huge biased problem to consider you opinion. You think men only want to drink 50 bottles of rum, break things and get into fights? You ever heard of gentlemen's club? You do know that they used to be a thing right? They just want a place that they can do stuff and feel like part of men's only group. It's easy to say men can have this and that but mind you men couldn't even have a peaceful abuse s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 03:40 AM
1

That's basically and mostly the privilege of women. A man has to be severely traumatized and broken to feel that way. Almost none of the men would ever think they would rather be alone for the rest of their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 03:17 AM
2

There indeed was an actual demand for male only spaces, like exclusive country clubs for example or sports bars. But now any place that is exclusively male will get highlighted saying discrimination and misogyny and so they had to allow women into these places as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 02:28 AM
-1

Plenty of men make great friends in bars and during sports. This was basically what exclusive clubs were for to increase networks and make good friends. But then women started invading them and men couldn't be men anymore as to accommodate the minority of women. Was what they are doing stupid stuff like talking about sex and women or relationship trouble or just a simple vent and rant? Yes. But they had that freedom to do so. Now they don't anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 02:26 AM

And yet they somehow end up with narcissistic, cheating and abusive guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/23 12:35 AM
1

Well for most people not getting with younger people attracted to their money is equal to remaining lonely and single. If the only prospect they have is money or status and almost all the women who come to them are only for that then they would rather go for younger ones than older ones who are also equally repulsed by them. I'm not saying it's right or wrong but simply explaining what might be the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:44 PM
1

The two exceptions are when you are a dad already or if the women is a widower.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 12:34 AM
1

That just means mean have. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiide range of what they consider as attractive. Most men barely have any standards at all for just ons.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 09:27 PM
1

Literally nobody thinks that a man should have a modicum of attraction to have sex. Men are horny. Simple as that. Take away the risks and women are just as horny if not more horny than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 03:10 PM
9

Basically anything that holds women accountable or accused women of something is misogyny as per that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 11:47 AM
3

It's cuz most of them know better than to speak such topics with you "the kind of person who uses terms like the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:21 AM
7

And If they expressed it they are labelled as creepy or accused of having ulterior motives for their nice behaviour and will be tagged as "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:16 AM
3

They don't want to be ONLY desired for being a provider. They don't want to be viewed as an ATM machine or objectified.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:58 AM
2

Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 05:16 AM
0

Death is the most frequent consequences that men faced. There is simply no discussion afterwards as it the end of discussions as well. Throughout history more often than not if men and women commited same crime then women would be criticized but men, well men would just die.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 04:48 AM
4

Nobody is saying all women's lives revolve around men's approval all the time. But if you think no women has ever changed themselves to look better for other men and to impress them then you are straight up delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 08:38 PM
2

But the men are also the ones dying majority of death through the life. The only scopes of death where women are ahead of men is during child birth the phenomenon which is impossible for men. In almost all the situations where we can compare man and women men come ahead when it comes to death regardless of weather through Suicide or other means.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 04:34 PM
15

But it is equally balanced with women also being just as obese as men. Unfortunately the standards of them haven't been updated to themselves though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 04:29 PM
5

There are soooooo many valid ways to divorce even in fault divorces other than just cheating. If you are doing something involving govt and related to other people then you should bear some responsibilities regards that. Simply "not feeling it" doesn't cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 04:50 AM
13

Nothing important is convenient. More times than not even when married couples stay together even though they don't want to sooner or later they will reach a compromise and has wayy higher chance of actually becoming a functional and happy family than when they simply divorce because they think a colleague is showing interest in them or because they think their partner is not giving them enough attention. Now obviously there is no one fit all situations. Almost everything kind of laws works for …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 03:39 AM
5

If that is true then that's a great value to follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:31 PM
3

Absolutely agree. And men who have a huge body count should also be considered as low value by women. But that's where hypergamy is coming in place. A actual HVM who is focused on one and hook ups and fwb will have more body count than avg or even HVW. But any avg guy will have wayyyyyyyy less body count than almost any women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:11 PM
3

I fully agree with you. And I hate myself for having to stay neutral and say this stuff but if you are a white man then youse experiment is extremely skewed on the fact that asian women have a huuge thing for white men especially for hook ups. So Singapore and Taiwan are not really proper places for this. But then again your experiment is to check the passport movement so I guess it kinda aligns with your original view. As white men get to pick who they want in Asian places.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 02:20 PM
1

You are leaving out the hypergamy of women where they usually marry upwards of their economic status. So if a womens general net worth is around 10k and her annual income is 50k but she married a man making 200k and leaves the job. Now after let's say 5 years she divorces him and gets just 30% (not even 50%) of it as alimony. She is making approx 70k as alimony. Just because she is married to him and the court awards this alimony to "sustain the lifestyle".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 04:37 PM
0

You do know that both are possible right? It could be both men and women's fault. But most of the topics discussed here are born from the sheer audacity to never admit that women can also be at fault or admit their own privileges. I and the whole world is more than happy to admit that men are with their faults and privileges but this never seems to be true for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 04:18 PM
0

It is absolutely not ok when men do it either. I absolutely hate simping men. They are one of the Biggest reasons for our crooked and twisted relationship dynamics. I was only mentioning that it is obvious that men are in the wrong for doing such things. As it is very well widely known how stupid and wrong men are shown and taken as in general. Now proving women are just as stupid and wrong, this is something new that is only recently being acknowledged and that too only by some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 02:18 AM
-4

Yeah basically they want to have t6hier cake and eat it too we get it. Women love it when they are given all the privileges and none of the real world ADULT responsibilities. Fun fact : literally nobody does. Women are like that because of the privileges they have and because they can afford to be like that in our current settings of modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 02:16 AM
1

The biggest factor in men having the most platonic female friendship is whether he already has a gf/wife. If he is not taken then he would obviously be in the search for someone to pair up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 02:05 AM
1

No I am saying men being attracted to women and simping for them is nothing new. They do it for almost all sorts of women. Women on the other hand rarely do it and do it to an extremely select few subset of men. Which is why it's also surprising when criminals and evil men make the cut but the abg Joe who knows how to cook and take if house doesn't make the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:43 AM
2

Plenty of normal-average women also get fan mails and marriage proposals. Men simping after women is not that uncommon. Women simping after evil or not nice guys though, that very common.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:36 AM
0

And just like that plenty of men are also learning how to be a responsible adult who can do laundry and cook food. The problem with the internet is that it's hyper focused on all the good things progress and development of women and all the bad things about men. There are plenty on the other side of the coin as well. Just because a women is working doesn't mean she is contributing equally to financially responsibility. A women can be a third rare attorney or clerk or librarian and it won't matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:23 AM
-2

And that's exactly why I told you that I'm with you if the women is earning equal or more than the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:16 AM
1

And what exactly would you consider as significant effort? Where do you propose men try to engage with women in romantic aspects outside of dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:12 AM
-4

I donno man, I think working a job that somehow sustains the lifestyle of the entire family doesn't seem very child-like. If anyone is more child like then it's most women who plenty of time refuse to budge on temper tantrums. There are wayy more women than men who think acting like a child is cute of some kind. I'm totally with you if the women is earning equal or more money than her husband but if she is a housewife or part-timer then it's basically her actual job to take care if house and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 12:29 AM
0

So basically it's all men's fault and women have no part in this, is that what you are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 12:16 AM

Absolutely. But even the type of women who get turned off with that type of actions are attracted to another type of sane thing. If it's not wealth then it's the body if not body then it's power. The thing is majority of young men do t have any of these and are suffering from intense loneliness the likes of which most women can't even fathom.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 12:12 AM
2

Gtfo your high horse. You are basically saying that if a person slaps you then you should show your other cheek. This will make 99% of people on this planet disqualify themselves as nice people. And despite that plenty of them are still considered nice people and good people. Get off internet and see how the real world works. The majority of people rarely do good things even when there is a good outcome. The kind of hyper moralistic people in this world would have long been either killed or woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 11:43 PM
2

Expecting nothing is basically just that expecting nothing. If something happens whether positive/negative then it's not nothing. You confuse me more. Do you not understand English? Is it your 7th language or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:40 PM
1

Tell that to all the tate fanboys that we do know is full of toxic shit. The reason they are following that toxic man is cuz he makes them feel heard. It's the same with majority of authoritarian regimes throughout history and world. The ones who make people (men/women) feel heard is the one who will be ruling regardless of their capabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:38 PM
1

That actually sounds like a great idea. We need to be like the women in the 50's and 70's where they fought for themselves. More often than not men who aren't ready to sacrifice themselves for others are looked down upon but fuk them. We should struggle for ourselves. If the whiny and making a fuss behaviour/protests is what gets results then we will do it that way itself. Obviously all of this should be done peacefully as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:34 PM
2

Because negative is not nothing. When he is expecting nothing and something positive or negative happens then obviously there would be good or bad consequences. If your friend asked you to help him with $20 and you did it without even expecting them back because you are a "nice guy" and doesn't expect anything in return for your acts of "charity" and then you get jailed over suspicious when it turns out your friend is a drug dealer and you are suspected of funding it as you have send him money t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:27 PM
2

Hurt our trust because those texts are most probably not the first time he mentioned his boundaries and not the first time she pretended to be ok with his boundaries and lied about following them then turned around and broke then in all the ways she can which resulted in breaking the trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:05 PM
1

And that's exactly what he did here though. He decided he can't date somone who surfs with others and posts bikini pics and broke up with her. He decided to enforce the boundaries by ending the relationship because she lied about being ok with his boundaries but then broke his trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:03 PM
1

Or use their own tactics against them by saying stuff like "you deserve someone better than me" , it's not you, it's me" etc. If you were honest about the reason then as you said somehow through someway they will twist it enough and make you a bad guy not just in thier mid but publish it to the whole world and make you a villain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 08:59 PM
1

Absolutely. But this is only applicable to women who actually do indeed very thoroughly for everyone. The problem is when they really want someone they are willing to let go of those screening process and when they most likely and inevitably do get burned by them blame it on men she never even gave a chance to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 08:18 PM

I never said I don't agree with you but was giving a reason to why women are coming from a privileged position and biased opinion. There is nothing wrong with those programs but don't delude yourself into thinking it's all in your own. Women are only able to do it because govt is supporting them. Basically govt took on the role of a husband for them. Which is why most women are not in such a hurry. The system is basically rigged is all that I am saying. As long as women are not thinking if sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 04:41 AM

Have you seen how a woman handles rejection from men? They take it wayyyyy harder than men. Where do you think statements like "where are all the good men" come from? You and I are saying the same thing. I am saying the end result which is women not getting selected and you are saying the process through which women came to know they were not selected. It is very easy to say I don't want to play the game when you are in a privileged position. As I said in other comments women are being provided …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 04:17 AM

Women are most definitely not fine before men start pursuing them. There are plenty of women movements and shows and podcasts dedicated to dissing men and how men SHOULD be as per thier opinion trying to dictate what men can or can't do etc. The women are only looking like they are fine because of the overwhelming privileges they receive both by society and by the government when compared to men. The points I am about to tell below are simple opinions being stated to make a point and I don't wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 04:07 AM

The experience you all are talking about is literally the same thing that men here are talking about. Women whine and diss men when they aren't selected for commitment by the hvm and men whine and diss women when they are not selected by any women for anything. For most men's bad experiences here also the situation is the same. The common denominator is obviously women for men as well. You didn't get done sort of enlightenment and clarity you just saw one side of the issue and closed your eyes f…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 03:49 AM

Oh absolutely true if the same women aren't whining constantly on "where are all the good men" and "all men are pigs" once they reach a certain age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 03:19 AM
7

It's not just that they don't care, they can't afford to as well. Men are not provided the same security as women when they participate in such social movements. Even throughout history women are spared , slaved but still spared their lives for most of their crimes. You donot see men's struggles because when a man makes a mistake more often then not he pays for it with his life one way or another. In the modern world, it's basically equal to social suicide and risk of losing job. Even HR might p…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:24 PM
2

Please do and DM me or comment here. It's such an intriguing thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 08:52 AM
1

Absolutely. I never said women's standards should be based on what men want them to be. Just theat if they are not what men want to be then she won't be having a cha ce with him but that is all. Why would it matter to women when some men are not available she has numerous others anyway. I hope you maintain the same standard to women as well when they complain about "good men" or when they are single mothers or incels themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 08:50 AM

Transwomen means women who turned into a man? Correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:22 AM
3

Where did talk about consistency come from suddenly? Also we are talking about the consistency of the filter? If so what you are basically doing is passing if a big as a feature. A filter by default should be working in everyone the same if you have different sets of filters for different people then that's what is called a hypocritical/ inefficient filter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:09 AM
4

Peak virtue signaling and defending.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:06 AM
2

There is some for if entitlement in this comment something much deeper to be found that what probably even the commentor knows. I can't put my finger on it though. Will have to think a bit more to come to conclusion. That's u/pop442 for triggering my deep analysis mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 04:02 AM
3

I am not talking about all women but about the hypocritical values of some women who indeed sleep with chads immediately to impress him but make everyone else wait. Obviously women aren't obligated to have sex if they don't want to. They just have to admit that they are hypocritical when they do the above mentioned actions. Again the kind of men who think women should have sex with them in first date but only with him are hated by other men just as much. Majority of men donot mind the filters if…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:55 AM
1

Those guys are exactly the kind that even other guys hate and shit on. The only reason we even question women in this is when they don't wait or use thier "filters" when she got a chance to sleep with a hot rich guy and she decides that she would rather leave her filter behind to have sex with him on first dat ir second rather than make him wait the usual amount as per her "filters".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:50 AM
3

Seat belts protect you from what they are supposed to protect in thier capabilities. You don't expect seat belts to protect you from radiation or when the seat itself is flung out of the car. Similarly a filter system would indeed work as per it's design. The filters will work as per their designs. It's only when you put your filter aside for a hot adventurous man that will never commit that we question you and your filter when used against other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:44 AM
1

It is only inefficient if they change the system as they see fit. If a woman always follows the same system then most people wouldn't have a issue with it and the filtering would indeed work. It's only when the women would sleep with a rich hot adventurous business man on first date itself but makes the one who she is also attracted to buy make him wait till 6th date that people get fussy over the hypocritical standards. I'm sure the women will have a twisted self serving logical reason behind t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:39 AM

We could actually make fun of it if it wasn't 2023 and some times they might need this clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:17 AM
0

Like us not an online dating game. majority of the relationship still start with a simple friendship. Obviously a man or women who wants to start a relationship with you would treat you better than others. When the prospect is out you will simply be treated as either a normal friend or be cut ties with. You seriously cannot expect the same treatment from others who wanted to date you when you have rejected them. You opinion is basically a privileged and narrow minded opinion of the higher order.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 03:10 AM

The number of risks of harm are wayyy more for buyers than sellers. Plenty of risks are involved in prostitution from mugging to blackmailing to kidnapping to organ harvesting. I do agree that the severity of risk is higher for sellers than buyers but buyers have their own separate risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:55 AM

That's exactly thier point. You are basically looking at 3 couples in a sea of 100 or even 1000 people and decided you are seeing many couples on street. You see couples because you are actively looking to find a pair if men and women. Not to mention just because you see a man and women doesn't immediately mean they are a couple either. It just mean you see two opposite gender people together. They could be anything from friends to colleges it business partners to sisters/brothers or any other r…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:45 AM

The only way I can think of is to legalization of it just like with drugs. But to make it illegal for pimps. If women want to do it they have to do all the work herself or have a govt start a non-profit organisation that doesn't take any commission for thier services and transferred everything to the employee. But it's too logical for humanity that mostly works on emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:29 AM

I was about to say the exact same phrase.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:11 AM

That's logical by a long shot. What it does is create more estein Island that cater to a select few rich people and criminals who are mostly immune from the law. What this law brings is giving more riskier and dangerous clients to the women than a regular Joe who is as careful as possible and only does something like this is desperate situation rather than for funsies and to induce niche humiliation on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:07 AM

Basically same as drugs and other criminal activities then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 01:56 AM
0

Wtf the obvious response to getting rejected when proposing is to cut ties with them. If a friend proposed to them and got rejected you can't expect him to continue doing all those favours he kept doing before. That's like asking your date to take you for dinner or movies after you made it clear you won't have a relationship with them ever. I obviously agree and understand that whining /blaming a women or thinking they are entitled to the women's body because they did her favours is wrong. But y…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 08:49 PM
1

You basically invented the wheel again. The whole notion of most frustration men that come here have is that they are almost always treated as some predator and is having to face judgement and prejudice because of the "dual maging strategy" that other men are employing. Men doing shitty things is widely known to everyone and is accepted which is why men are treated worse than women in most public places and by most people in general. What's frustrating to the men here is that even though plenty …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 01:39 AM
1

And I agree with you. But govt has a lot more to consider than its own actual opinion. A lot more times than not govt takes action that will cause least resistance then the actions that are justified. This is at least a start.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 01:28 AM
2

Which is why in current situation alimony is still in effect until a certain amount of time after divorce. It's is not fair only when it's a lifetime supply.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 01:20 AM
1

Which is exactly why the alimony is only granted for a limited amount of time, so that the women who have up on their careers aren't living on the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 01:19 AM
-2

"more complicated than that" basically means whatever we say is correct whatever opposing thing that you say is wrong and not having to provide any evidence or logical reasoning behind any words.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 01:06 AM
1

I totally agree that being a sahp that actually does all the house chores is not less that a wfh job. It's just a job that is being done at home. If you think it has that much value then they are more than welcome to join hotels or other cleaning services or food delivery apps to continue doing the same thing that they were doing while they are sahp. There is no need to give them a break just cuz they are taking a break from thier career because they are now skilled in different field that they …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:41 PM
1

But that's the thing. If you want to go that route then the husband/wife will also have to pay for all the groceries and appliances that she was using that the husband bought. She will have to start paying rent in the house, for using tv, fridge, washing machine, for all the food and groceries that the husband bought with his earned money etc. For all the dresses, jewelery, transportation costs, car rentals, petrol, movie tickets, restaurant bills, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:38 PM
-1

But that's the thing, its the consent of women to become a sahp that's important here. She willingly became a sahp. Nobody can force her to be that way. Lawfully speaking a man has no right in the decision of whether a woman works or not. A women has the right to decide weather she works or not and only she has that right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:31 PM
1

In plenty of shelters women have preferences. Women have quotas and reservations for lots of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 04:05 PM
1

Exactly what I meant. Even though Trump comes under the general definition of beta bux he is still an alpha which is the exception here. Do you still not see the point here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:46 AM
1

Because they are exceptions. This woman is an exception just like Trump also comes under beta bux(since he is doing nothing but providing money for his supermodel wife) but is also an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:34 AM
3

You said women can get all if thier social and emotional needs be net without having to get into a relationship there are two things that were missing from that statement. Women are also easily able to get their physical needs and validations be net without being in a relationship. Men don't have suc privileges to reky in other as easily as women. Men can't even be close to other men or women that easily. The only place they can freely talk and it is also accepted is if they pay for it and go to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:32 AM
2

Are you saying there aren't any women exclusive privileges or benefits run by the government? Or perhaps that they didn't have special quotas or are given preferences in most things? Look I didn't mind nor do I oppose most of those special privileges but just don't go acting like you are the one that accomplished everything when there are tons of other variables supporting you from behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:26 AM
-2

Basically most women are ignorant of how much sheer amount of effort a average man has to put to just get into a relationship that he wants. There have been tons of experiments done in this topic where women were setting up men's profile to prove that they can do better if they were the man where almost always it ended up with women becoming depressed over how awful dating market is for men. Lemme give you a clear cut example incel women are basically trust fun kid backpacking through Europe hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 09:40 PM
3

Basically most women are ignorant of how much sheer amount of effort a average man has to put to just get into a relationship that he wants. There have been tons of experiments done in this topic where women were setting up men's profile to prove that they can do better if they were the man where almost always it ended up with women becoming depressed over how awful dating market is for men. Lemme give you a clear cut example incel women are basically trust fun kid backpacking through Europe hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 09:39 PM
3

Basically most women are ignorant of how much sheer amount of effort a average man has to put to just get into a relationship that he wants. There have been tons of experiments done in this topic where women were setting up men's profile to prove that they can do better if they were the man where almost always it ended up with women becoming depressed over how awful dating market is for men. Lemme give you a clear cut example incel women are basically trust fun kid backpacking through Europe hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 09:39 PM
3

But that's the thing. It's not thier own self sufficiency but the one being born by the govt and rest of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 04:25 PM
1

If this women is representing your point then existence of Trump negates your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 04:23 PM
1

Yeah no. She most definitely had an issue with it, but she chose you more more important than her principles. Also have you heard of second hand smoke?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 12:07 PM
-1

It's bad for all those who don't want to smoke weed though. Because they will either have to give up thier convictions and indulge in smoking weed with them or give up on the person. Not to mention smoking weed itself has its own share of issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 08:46 AM
-2

That's why I said I also admire the courage of women for when they give the guys a chance. But then again there are poisoned fruits on the women's side as well you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 12:21 PM
-1

I literally gave compliment first half and said my wish on second half. Must've been confusing since I kept two if then together.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 05:50 AM
2

Isn't that the thing we all crave for
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 02:08 AM
1

And then you see the absolute abuser if a man but with hit looks never be single in all his life. I also agree that personality matters wayy more in relationship that physical hotness but without the physical attraction the great personality guy won't get to prove his worth at all cuz most women wouldn't even know about him. It's worth less to be the greatest dancer in the world if you are not even allowed into the stage to prove how great you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 01:13 AM
1

You have to understand that pursuing women is not the same as pursuing a man. The abundance of choice forms a huge hole in women's thinking in how absolutely cruel and unfair the situation is for men. Men have to take the first step in asking them out, they have to think if witty and interesting things to talk to her, they have to search and select a restaurant, they have to bear the cost of dates for him to seem like a gentleman. They even have to risk being called a molester/rapist to make the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 01:10 AM
1

Absolutely but as the person above said, for this to work, women should start pursuing men openly first. This issues only occur because men are the one doing majority of the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 12:58 AM
2

Because that's the majority of the women who don't find them sexually or romantically involved. It only feels like we are pursuing more because women rarely ever pursue the average man. If both genders are pursuing equally then a loooooot of problems in modern dating would be resolved.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 12:55 AM
1

Guys love low maintenance women. In fact they are the one who they can most genuinely love.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 12:50 AM

A loyal and loving partner. But I guess anyone saying this would be treated the same as slave owners as if thinking in the lines of if I deserve more for a man is equal to them only being happy if they have a physical leash and cage around women. But none of this apply to women right? Women can openly say they deserve whatever they want and they will be praised with you go girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:27 PM
5

As I said this is you speaking from a privileged position. This Is the same kind of talk that actual people of KKK or any race supremists or actual misogynists give when they are talking about discrimination. They can also simply say that these are their standards. And changing those standards would involve forcing them or coercing them. But that doesn't feel wrong to you does it. Do you see the correlation now? Do you understand your privileged position now? And do not forget that privileged po…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:38 PM
2

What do you mean all it does is disprove red pill myths? Despite being very unique plenty of human(both men and women) want lots of common things. For starters nobody wants a person who is likely to kill them or abandon them. Everyone wants someone who truly lives them and is not manipulating them or doesn't backstab them. Everyone wants a person who is healthy to not die a early death. There are plenty of such common things. Everyone is not so unique now are they? Most women do not understand t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 03:29 PM
5

Different women having different opinions doesn't exactly solve any problem either. That is simply a tool used to deflect responsibility. That is like saying govt doesn't want to fund or help citizens with anything because different groups of people want different things. Or schools not teaching anything common to students because different students have different capabilities. As I said in my earlier comment that you ignored as well(hypocritical much?) Different women having different opinions …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:44 PM
12

Nobody is asking women to be hypnotized/compelled/coerced into having sex with men. Men are saying the standards are crooked. Plenty of Women(not all) are saying one thing but doing an entirely different thing. They say personality is the most important thing when not having good enough looks doesn't even let you through the door. You being the greatest dancer in the world isn't worth shit when you are not allowed on the stage to perform and prove your worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:37 PM
2

Did you seriously ignore everything else I mentioned in my comment to just say some fancy stuff to again deflect the issue instead of having a discussion on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:20 PM
9

It isn't a problem TO YOU. It is most definitely a problem for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:19 PM
15

That is such a stupid statement to make for deflection of blame. "Everything is normal. If something is not normal then you are the problem. It is literally not possible that the problem to be on my side no matter what" is what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:05 PM
8

I am so sick of this "women are not monolith" excuse being used for every single data thrown at them. We get it each women is a very unique snowflake that still somehow behaves in similar ways of 80% other women. As unique as snowflakes are they are still frozen water. Just like no matter how unique each women is they still have similar expectations and entitlement as most other majority of women. Just because a woman likes steak more and other woman like chicken more doesn't mean they are very …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:02 PM
6

Lmao. You should see the amount of women that also watches anime. Or worse things like BL. You would fear for your moral level when you hear or read the kind of shit women write and read in those countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 04:51 AM
0

But that's the thing with men. Most of them would be content as long as they have 2 things sex and food. They don't have any kind of complex hormones that fluctuate and go frenzy. They don't need any special attention during 3-5 days per month. Their judgement are not based on thier time if the month. They dint have any body functions where for a extended period of time (9 months) produce crazy amounts if harmones to facilitate another human. So which would you trust in making a more sane judgem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:14 AM
3

Oh no no. If women clearly communicate such things then they will lose the friendzoned orbiters around her who she can use as much as she wants for All kinds of needs including attention. That's the real unconscious reason why women don't explicitly state whatever they are looking for. Stating it out works against their gain. Men have to invest heavily to get into relationships when compared to women who just have to choose among the plenty that offer themselves to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:24 PM
11

But that's the thing. It's is accepted everywhere and men are open about it by saying looks are important. But women rarely ever openly agree that looks are important. They act like personality is more important than looks and only state personality when asked for what kind of man they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:15 PM
2

But that's the thing. It's not just men vs women anymore but men vs women, govt and media.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:38 AM
3

That's the thing. It's not random strangers responsibility but the parents of the girl who might even have any form of right to criticize the girl's actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 08:37 AM
6

That's like saying plenty of men can walk around without any shirt and half naked at midnight without worrying about being harassed so why can't women do the same thing. Despite what the world makes you think men and women are not the same. For socially awkward women or even women in general it is easier to get a boyfriend because she is not the one putting in majority of the work to get into a relationship. It is mostly the man who asks others out, who tries to flirt and who try to interact wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 06:04 AM
1

And that is also wrong. Every adult absolutely needs to learn basic stuff like cooking and laundry.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:53 AM

It is not being directed but more like people are acknowledging that women also have flaws selections. Previously it was already 100% the father's fault. But now some people are coming out and are starting to question women's actions as well which never happened until now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 05:04 AM

Yes but it is the women who decide who to have sex with. The majority of men are open to having sex with almost all the women as long as they have that option. Women absolutely gatekeep stuff like sex and pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 09:45 PM

Hating on men and calling them names is very very common throughout history. But calling out women and calli g them names? Now that's the new shiny thing in town that has arrived with all this equality. You can't just have the good parts of it and it ignore the bad parts. If you getting the good parts like employment and other rights then unfortunately you will also be open to criticism from others unreasonably just like how men were treated throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 09:39 PM
0

I have also clarified that it's the media and govt that pushes and enhances this effect rather than just women themselves. Like in most media content women are rarely shown as shallow as they truly are. Like as if looks don't matter. Even In the movies where They say looks don't matter and only personality does and they are partnered with people like bead pitt or Jason momoa.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 12:31 PM
1

Yup, as I said "exceptions"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 03:53 AM
1

But that's the thing, even absolutely avg women will still have plenty of attention when compared to the avg guy out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 02:17 AM
3

The difference between most men and women in this aspect is that women themselves have the freedom to set thier standards themselves and can even gain confidence from the fact that number of men find her attractive enought to right swipe in her to to give her special attention where as for men this is simply not possible. Basically women confidence and standards can be set by herself but for men it's the opposite the world decides your standards and therefore your confidence levels. Same with va…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 01:57 AM
0

A lot of them do that because most of the time women act like holier than thou and that looks don't matter as much and they dint just donot to hide their shallow nature but plenty of women do it to keep her friendzoned orbiters to keep surrounded to make him feel like he actually has a chance. If all women do admit to being just as shallow as men or if the world admits that women are also just as shallow as men then all these people who call names will obviously disappear but that's the thing. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 01:29 AM
2

Your error is to think women are different from men in such aspects. Make the situation similar for both men and women and women cheat just as much if not more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 01:22 AM
3

They can be considered as hot guys with some form of disabilities as they are exception to the rule. As creatures penguins and hens are exception in birds.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/23 01:19 AM
1

Women do ask men out? Like once a year. And even if a women never asks anyone out in her entire lifetime there is still a high chance that she will be able to find a romantic partner. This is not he same for men. Most people USED to be able to have relationships. The dynamics have been drastically changing in the last 10 years. Do you see the difference in what you said? A man who never has sexual or romantic relationship will not be the one pursued by women but the opposite is true for women. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 03:46 PM
1

As I said even if a person develops a normal active social life there is very very small chance that he will find a gf cuz even now majority of time it is men who still have to initiate the asking out. No matter what men do there isn't much difference in how they are treated. Would ut increase their chances if succes after asking out? Small chance Increase yes but not by much. The only solution is if women start actively asking men out and not just stay passive and sit on thier ass and select am…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:51 AM
1

As I said very very small portion of such people resort to threat and violence. Most such people just stay helpless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:46 AM
2

How are you not understanding this? Men also want the option to choose but they are giving up so that their wife can choose and decorate the house however she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:45 AM
0

Obviously it's never simple. It's not simple even with the ex but she still did it. When women refuse in such things it will bring in the question of how attracted they are to thier current bf and about thier commitment to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:08 AM
1

Men absolutely do care but only when allowed to. And Most of the time the surrender not push the job to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 06:06 AM
2

Thank you. I've been trying to put this same thought into words for so long and you said it perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 05:36 AM
1

Not really. As someone said lonely men are told to "man up" or berated. Never have I seen any empathy towards them. Even even if there is any it is as low as a drop in ocean when compared to empathy that women are shown.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:41 AM
2

But that's the thing. It's obviously alright when women are complaining in fact when she does govt and men or other women rushes to help them. But when men are complaining they are being called incel terrorists and are being out on FBI watchlist. See how different the treatment is between men and women. I do know that the reason for that is action of very very few men but that didn't stop them from generalizing every single unattractive single men as someone to be vary about.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:31 AM
1

Ffs the fault if being single is not always the same for both genders. It is indeed a women's fault if she is single but it is not a man's fault if he is single. Women are the one in position of power as they are the one who choose who to be in relationship with. Majority of men simply cannot afford to have standards and wait till someone finds them like with women. The 97.5% number is a ridiculous one. It can only be someone acceptable if women are picking men up and asking men out as much as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:28 AM
2

You have to understand that the advice you are giving is highly biased and mostly works for women and not for men. Do you know how much time it takes to actually do go to these meetups and how miniscule the chance is to actually find someone who is also interested in you? Women don't face this difficulty cuz wherever they go there will always be someone for them. The type of advices you gave or the kind of advices like there is always one out there for someone, just be urself doesn't work for me…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:24 AM
0

That's because the role of stability provided by men is simply being taken care of by the govt while there is no scarcity if sexual need being taken care of for women as she can choose from the many options that she has. It took a looooot of special privileges provided by MEN in government that are continuing even now to get women to where they are now. You could say that well that's because women were behind for all those years but that's not men's fault for women biological issue. Women need a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:21 AM
3

Not really. The govt is simply taking over the role of men in a women's life. Women aren't exactly taking care if themselves alone. There are a ton of new regulations and new privileges through which some few women are handling being a single mother. Obviously it's men who contribute the most to the system. It has always been men. And yes unfortunately it is indeed ironic that laws created by men itself are what screwing over men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 02:16 AM
0

Because one in a moontime they could have sex with the so called "anime character" and they think this is their standard and anyone less than this is beneath them. The reason for this is women have the luxury set their own standard where as for men the world sets their standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 12:28 AM
4

Are you saying most women do not want to live in a house designed as per their taste but to live in a house that designed as per their husbands taste?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 11:36 PM
1

Like selecting what drapes suit the carpet(but never allowing thier husband to pick it because they want it as per thier taste ) where to go for vacation and how to go there etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 11:35 PM
8

You do realise that the same rule applies to yourself as well right? You also donot get to decide what other people mean when they speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 11:33 PM
4

Most women are in charge of planning and organizing and running the household because that is what they wanted. And if a guy wants to do it then most women would cause a ruckus saying nobody cares about her opinion. They are the one in charge because they don't want a man to do it. They dint want their husband to select the drapes/carpet that might or might be to their taste. Don't act like women are doing men a favour by having to pick everything as they want to and select where they go how the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 11:18 PM
5

So glad we could clear this up. So men don't owe women anything and women don't owe men anything in marriage. Perfect. It's basically no different than a legalized documented friendship now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 06:19 PM
3

Then women are also not owed men money and housewives believing they are owed his money is women entitlement and how they get into abusive relationships. If a women is unhappy with the quantity or quality if money she is getting from her husband then it in her to decide weather she accept this or not. The man is not obligated to give up his earnings for her. Govt also should stop stuff like alimony. A man is not obligated to share his resources with his partner not even in marriage. It is expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 05:23 PM
1

Why exactly do you think it doesn't matter whether a person ex who thier share a kid with is hot or not? Ideal it shouldn't matter, yes but that's not the world we live in. Ideally they also shouldn't be a single parent unless they are a widower. Do you think the govt punishes the women or were there any laws to punish women if she is not proving proper childcare? Cuz there most definitely are laws involved when the man doesn't provide their financial support.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 03:50 AM
0

Because most women refuse even simple things like anal with their husbands and time passes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 03:01 AM
1

By stating it before hand itself that I am not into these cats because I tried it and I don't like them. I agree that nobody has to tolerate something painful or humiliation but I disagree and have to say that you do indeed owe your partner sexual intimacy if they are indeed your partner. Sexual intimacy is the base of what differentiate partner with close friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 02:55 AM
1

I replied to a similar comment sometime before. It's because paying a hooker comes at a extremely high price and I'm not talking about money. Majority of the time most women will instantly reject a man if she finds out he paid for a hooker. It's either get rejected or start the relationship on a lie. Despite what the internet makes us believe the majority of both men and women are actually decent. Both are just trying to make the best of what they can. Not to mention the extreme humiliation if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 02:18 AM
4

But plenty of women are already ignoring the social conditioning to get with the top % of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 01:19 AM
1

Absolutely 💯 agree with what you are saying. Most women are just lazy to properly vet and prefer being passive and let the man lead the entire courtship process. It's hard for women cuz they can get options even without working hard. They need to do wayy kess than men to get what they want but since they can get low quality even if they do nothing they prefer to go that 2ay and then later complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:47 AM
1

OMG ffs, again incel and misandrists are two very different things. Di they co incide sometimes yes but incel is a goddamn gender neutral term and can be used to describe all sorts of people including men, women, good men, and misogynistic men , good women and misogynistic women. You are literally saying the equivalent of all men when you keep refering to incels for everything. Now there is absolutely no issue at all even if you continue tibdi the same thing but either stop blaming these misogyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:43 AM
1

Well maybe most men don't want to be permanently off the dating market then. Just because a person wants sex doesn't mean they want to ruin thier chances at future relationship. Now if the person is sure they would never want a relationship then that's fine and perfect for going to hookers. Not for most people though. The truth is despite most of people saying lots of stuff including in this sub all they 2ant is a trusty partner who they can have a fulfilling relationship with. Does that also in…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:34 AM
1

So basically you are saying most of the men who have ever gone to hookers have gotten married or tried dating again?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:21 AM
1

You are literally engaging in calling such misandristic men as incels and yet you continue blaming modern men for turning it into something it's not. You are part of the problem who are misusing the word incels and taking away and insulting the LGBTQ community by regularly doing so. Just look at how many times you used incels to describe someone that they are not. If you know the proper meaning of incels then follow it. There are plenty of words to describe the kind of men that you want to descr…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:20 AM
1

Being good at obtaining the sex is literally the first step in current online dating market. If you don't impress the other women enough to make them attracted to you then there is literally nothing left with normal men. They are using whatever is effective. The good men who actually donot lie, have moral values and don't do cheating type things and those who prefer long term are either already taken(if attractive enough for some women) or are not getting even a chance to prove that they have al…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:04 AM
1

Your auntie sounds clever. If only more people were like her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/23 12:00 AM
5

And yet women still are choosing this unfair trade rather than making it fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:58 PM
1

And get permanently off the dating market cuz for majority of the women a man seeing a hooker is a big deal breaker. It's either that or start your relationship by hiding your deal breakers. Which do you think is better?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:57 PM
8

Hole shit , thank you dude. I have this same reasoning in my mind but couldn't put it in words. You explained it perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:49 PM
2

Thats exactly the situation with those women and rest of the men. But they literally can't comprehend or corelate that they are doing the same friggin thing to other men that they get irritated with when it happens to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:47 PM

Lots of GOOD sex. Not just sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 03:22 PM
1

I have no idea what you mean and why you said what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 03:20 PM
1

Do you even know the meaning of incel? Or do you just follow whatever is taught to you like someone says elephant is pink? Do you just parrot it? Love bombing is not the issue. In fact love bombing is what people love. It's the shitty behavior that abusers do that is wrong. There is a huge difference between what those abusers say and what red pillers say. There are some common points sure but most points of RP are focused on themselves instead of others. I do agree that RP employ some methods t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 03:19 PM
1

Did you even read the post? You talk as if love bombing is some sort of nuclear fusion theory. Also why you making this personal? Can't you stay civil?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:17 AM
1

Introduction this brand new concept called monagomy and marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:54 AM
3

Yes and men Don't spout nonsense like only confidence and personality matters. Majority if men agree on what they want. To have sex with a hot women. They absolutely also want the lovey dovey stuff but they don't pretend like also want the good sex part, unlike some. Who pretend that they are not shallow like men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:50 AM
3

You say it like as if in a matriarchal societies throughout history where women are the one in position of power it was them who fought while protecting men. No even in such societies where actual exploitative, oppressive, abusive predators it was still men who had to go to wars, the women might has slightly higher participation but it was still majority if men that had to go to war and be explored most. When you have a gun in hand or good weapon the enemies gender is meaningless, they all die t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:26 AM
-2

Lol so basically you are in the opposite spectrum of those who say men but to refer to women they say female. Since you are referring to men as males but women as women. I do agree that almost all men want to be kinda in thier own kingdoms and their HOUSE is the closest thing they have as thier Kingdom regardless of whether it's with or without women. Women degrade and belittle other women especially if those women are opting out of having kids and career oriented women especially if they are si…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 02:07 AM
21

Lol plenty of criminals and misogynistic and misandristic people are successful in the dating field. Also you are asking the wrong gender this question. Ask the women who have the hots for such people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:02 AM
40

There are plenty of men and women abusers who are highly successful in dating despite having such a negative, regressive , oppressive views of the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 12:18 AM
13

A simple acknowledgment of our efforts goes a long way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 11:44 PM
5

So you agree that there is a imbalance in the economic status? Also household labour is not a valid excuse for when they are in the dating stage or marriage stage. It is wayy further into marriage that such things matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 11:42 PM
8

OMG you are really over using that phrase. Women marry people from similar socioeconomic class, they don't necessarily date then always. Sometimes it's higher sometimes it's lower depending on what else the guy is bringing to the table. Also just because women are marrying someone from similar socioeconomic class doesn't mean she is contributing equally to house finances. Women spend wayyyyyy more in thier own personal expenses like jewellery, cosmetics shoes etc than men despite some earning le…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 09:08 PM
3

Probably copied from a " I deserve 6 pack, 6 figure 6 feet in some women's bio".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 09:03 PM
2

Staying in relationship is easy for avg adult male. The bar is kinda low there. You just have to be a normal responsible adult. it's getting into relationships and making the women stay loyal to you that's the hard part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:58 PM
2

College is very different and is only applicable to very small percentage of population. Work is discouraged heavily cuz it will easily ruin your career if something goes wrong. So basically it's down to friends, where it is also discouraged to suggest something else other than simply being friends. The only viable solution is for women to start picking men actively at least for the first step so that men know they can proceed to make something. Obviously as I said earlier none of these are appl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:45 PM
7

Stop twisting my word. I never said people only express feelings for attention. I said women who express stuff like "nobody likes me or wants me" know that that is not true but still say it for attention and empathy and validation. Where exactly are normal men supposed to find women? Because every other place from malls to markets to office to cafe, men are villified if they try to talk to women when they are alone. The kind of people who don't care about causing others discomfort are the kind o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:34 PM
1

It's pretty self evident by the amount of effort women actually have to put in the dating apps and how much effort men have to put in dating apps. A women only has to do initial effort(taking pics writing bio) and wait for others to choose and can be passive reactive and still get dates as long as she is not in bottom 20%. It's the opposite for men, they not only have to do the initial investment but also everything else including bring funny or impressive or carrying the conversation to selecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 02:21 PM
4

But that's exactly the kind of people modern women are fawning over. So you've got to figure out why they are the way they are. I think you haven't understood what I meant. I said you probably think women saying such stuff about herself is true when they are only saying it for sympathy or attention. And what you are describing about man I basically what the world has decided a man is like. Why do you think the stupid phrases like "men are all dogs or men only want one thing" come from? And why d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:58 PM
6

That is such a convenient bold lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:51 PM
1

This will just result in men contributing to society even less that they are already doing it. As you said 2elfare isn't coming to our of thin air but through taxes of the men and women. Basically if this feature is only available for 3rd child then I don't mind. But giving this feature for all children will definitely not go well and push the hypergamy to its absolute limits. You have to understand that as more and more men and valued less by the society they reverse will soon start happening. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 01:42 PM
1

But that's the thing. No women is criticized now for being alone but men are heavily criticized if they are alone(virgin) after a certain age. Which will peer pressure them into doing something like committing to whoever is available rather than actually be able to wait till he find someone who meets his criteria. So no a women being single by choice and a man being single by choice are treated very very differently by the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:58 AM
2

The "some of the posts" is the key word here. Even those some is wayy more than all the posts combined here because thier user base is just as large. The amount if women who simply hate in men on those subs is wayy higher than all the members combined in this kind of sub where they allow men as well to vent thier frustration (only to some extent).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:46 AM
2

Well that's just her experience speaking. If she's gonna be passive and keep giving her time to such people because only such playboys will not care about not causing discomfort to women by asking her out. Unless most women actively start taking responsibility for her own life and start asking men out on dates they gonna be stuck with fucbois. Cuz they are the ones who will try for 100 women and succeed with 3 without caring for consequences of the discomfort they may cause the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:41 AM
11

And literally every single main stream media does the opposite. They belittle the providing 9-5 avg guy every fukin chance they get. They treat women as if they can literally do no wrong. Even if a women straight up robs a bank some people/media will still give her benefit of doubt. The cesspit of misogyny you see in Twitter and YouTube, are you saying there aren't thousands of accounts that pose the exact opposite of what you are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:38 AM
4

Men having no standards is the biggest issue in the current generation. Men themselves donno that they don't like that some women but are so fukin lonely that they would indeed accept anyone. We don't need to tell women, most if them do know that there will always be someone within thier circle who will accept them within a heartbeat. I feel like you believe the fake words that women use to describe thier oude situations like "I'm damaged" "nobody likes me" "nobody will accept me" etc. They only…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 08:33 AM
1

It is to show the shallow nature that most women pretend they don't have. It's cuz most women pretend that man will never have to participate or take on the role of step dad but if he doesn't step up then literally every one will treat him like the evil shit that could ever exist. This applies to some extent for women as well but as you said society recognises that women are providing the child care and value it but what the step dad provides is never valued in fact govt actively punishes the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 07:07 AM
2

And plenty of "wures " with multiple kids also chase after other men to play step dad with. If the govt wasn't supporting single moms it would be visible wayy more than it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 05:22 AM
2

As if single moms don't try to have men play step dad to thier kids. The reason he state the example of a man who has a child with supermodel but is looking for a stable women to take care of him is cuz that's exactly what most of the women do. They have kids with people more attractive than them and then try to look for men to take care of the child with together. If the govt is not supporting single mother's as much as it is now then there would be a loooooooot more single mothers openly doing…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 05:21 AM
-2

Who do you think apologies most in a relationship and why do you think that is? You think women simply do not fuck up as much as men ? They absolutely do but they simply get away with it even without as much as a apology.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 05:01 AM
1

If women were doing stuff like helping him with money regularly , being a emotion sholder most if times, putting up with thier antics then men would have no problem with continuing thier "friendships" with women. It's just that most if the time the contribution level in friendship is rarely ever equal between men and women. Men have to work a lot even in friendship with women. There are obligations for men who are friends with women but there are rarely as many obligations on women when they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:32 AM
1

Absolutely agree but that is cuz it 8s very much clear who is at fault here "men". When men fuck up there is no benefit of doubt it anything like that regarding whose fault it is. Unlike when women fuck up where a army of people will defend her actions because she herself will not paint the picture as she is wrong. The highest they will go is to say stuff like "it's not youz it's me" but that too in a patronizing way and not wholeheartedly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:13 AM
-3

Absolutely. Men atleast admit that they fucked up and tat it's thier men fault (whatever reason might be from its natural from men to cheat to it's was a drunken mistake) unlike women who put most if the blame on thier victim. Both reasons are still shitty. But atleast one side sees themselves for what they are unlike the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 04:08 AM

And what you say assume I never directly got to know one. Truth is most women themselves don't know what they want. They most definitely donot want to disclose that info to everyone even if they do know what they want though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 02:25 AM

The problem lies in normal women not expressing thier standards properly. A 5'3 women would never openly admits they are ok with a 5'5 guy until after she is dating him. Which automatically means the crazy ones who keep shouting the 6 ft 6 figure 6 pack ones were taken seriously as the standard set by all women. Normal women are keeping quite cuz it's working in thier favour as well. Also there is nothing wrong with women wanting a partner to contribute same as them but then look down on men who…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:51 PM
3

And Jesus would still die a virgin man even in 2023. Even I wouldn't say it is a bad thing to be a virgin regardless of gender. It's the massive amounts of media that can make money on such vulnerability by selling them tinder subscriptions and other addictions who say such things. And women being oblivious to it and enforce it to hide thier own insecurities definitely doesn't help men in any way either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:44 PM

Ever heard of pretty privilege? The statements are basically just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:27 PM

Yeah and the credit for that goes to birth control and resulting hook up culture. Not just because of financial independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:12 PM

Yeah and the credit for that goes to birth control and resulting hook up culture. Not just because of financial independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:08 PM
21

The difference is friends and the whole world. If somebody makes fun of a virgin women publicly the whole world will come to defend her. Where as it simply doesn't care about men. Your friends poking fun about it and knowing whole world will make fun of it is very different scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 05:45 PM
3

It's redo of healer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 05:38 PM
11

Yes women love being in hypocritical situations. They want to "tame the beast". Which is why fantasy like vampire are so much famous with women. They want a bad guy to everyone to be good guy only for them. Which all sounds good but reality doesn't work that way. A guy who is violent with others will inevitably more often than not also be violent with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter