TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Avakayi Archive

View 7 posts and 168 comments by Avakayi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But they are looking for a provider. And a provider wouldn't exactly laugh like those that you mentioned. First of all there is absolutely nothing wrong with waiting 3 months for sex or looking for a provider infact the trash takes itself out. The problem is only if they are hypocrites who will have sex with a 10/10 person within 10 min of meeting then but will demand the provider to wait 3 months for anything. They can absolutely change from thier past experiences and such and people who are ok…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 04:50 PM
2

Classic case of abuser love bombing. You can never get out until you actually do. Once you get some distance and not give into pseudo love showered on you then and only then you will realise how bad the situation is and how big an physical DV abuser she actually is.
/r/MenSupportMen19/11/22 12:47 AM
3

Asian.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 12:44 AM
1

How in the hell is men hating women maintaining power dynamic when entire constitutions are being changed to provide more and more benefits and security at the expense of men because of these few men who hate women ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 01:05 PM
1

Just look at court trails of mothers who killed thier own babies or wives who kill thier husbands, they either throw it away as PPD or fed up by husband's abuse and retaliated type thing. Women are genuinely given lesser time and less harsher punishment for the same crime when compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 01:01 PM
1

I don't think isis cares much about men reporting badly on them differently than women either.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:38 PM
79

Things that benefit them ? Big dick energy. Things that don't benefit them ? Small dick energy. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:16 PM
1

For Potential employers? unfortunately yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:13 PM
1

Or if the right man doesn't appear.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:22 AM
27

Shh. If you say things like that then the women would Blame nen for not increasing the requirements or would spout nonsense like women are already perfect to begin with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/22 04:10 PM
2

You would surprised to know how dumb Indian men and women are.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:34 PM
2

Pretty soon unpaid casual sex and normal marriage are going to be only for rich people. like how now, a family of 4 or above living in suburbs on one income is something only rich people can do.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:37 PM
1

u/savevideo
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 12:53 PM
5

Cancel culture wants to say hi.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:55 AM
12

Basically they want be become what they wanted to eradicate. Tyranny is wrong unless they are the ones in charge scenario. You were right in both your former and later statements. They want to drink, do drugs, abuse thier spouse, yet also talk like all of this is wrong when men do it.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:51 AM
59

Don't forget that these feminists and women groups are the biggest obstacle and are the most opposers to gender neutral laws. Because the Indian laws are that F'ed up against men and in favor of women. All of feministic liberal ideas and thier pseudo support to LGBT community is ignored and forgotten when it comes to supporting gender neutral laws.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:47 AM
6

Look at the size of women's groups across various social media. And the tremendous support they recieve from both govt and public. Majority of the issues we are facing and ae frustrated with are actually caused by misuse of special privileges and rights granted to women. So if men's right actually did try to do something they would be shut down faster than a lightning.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:34 AM
18

Remember the Indian "feminists" are not just opposing gender neutral r@p laws. They are opposing gender neutral laws for everything like domestic issues as well. For how much these feminists claim they are liberal they are awfully oppressive of all the LGBT community by not allowing them to have basic rights and protection as every other citizens.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:09 PM
1

Yeah well unfortunately not everyone in the world feels that way. Infact majority of the world feels the opposite way. Especially the people in power. Is it fair ? Absolutely not. What you said in the end was absolutely correct. Everyone should be allowed complete authority over thier body when it comes pregnancy provided they don't risk the health of the mother and have the permission of father. Welcome to unfair world or the adult world.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:47 PM
8

As someone said nobody is forcing these women to have sex and give child births and raise them all on her own Just like how nobody is forcing men to have responsibilities over a child he didn't want for 18-21 years... Oh wait that is exactly what's happening so how is govt not making laws that are restrictive towards men? . A proper way to make it as difficult for men is to ban vasectomy just like how they banned abortions. FyI I am pro choice within certain time limit i.e with 3-4 months.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:44 AM
1

It's "your opinions matter and are valid only when they are beneficial to women". It has been for many decades now.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:33 AM
5

The biggest issue is they following the same principals and tricks used by actually oppressive men many decades ago. Some stupid people actually used to say they women are air headed or stupid to not give them some rights. Now these dumb idiots are following and using the same tactics that they claim they have suffered from. So basically they are not against tyrannical ruling as long as they are the ones doing the ruling.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:56 AM
15

Yes someone should have commented that she is not an racist but an extreme sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 05:57 AM
1

What do you mean your son let you ?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:11 PM
4

That's men's day.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:40 PM
9

Why the hell are you even here ? Just to play devil's advocate I guess.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:24 PM
3

Calling single men who are also picky and not simping other women as incels. Incel is not gender specific but gender neutral. Women who are single can also be called incels but for some reason only men get called that.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:10 PM
15

What the hell is your problem? Did you even read the sub title? And what the heck are you even doing here? I see you in every post. Literally all of your suggestions are similar to saying don't wear shirt clothes and don't go out at dangerous timings to women when bringing out rape issues. Do you even know how hypocritical you are ?
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:06 AM
1

Like the world needs more gender studies "PHD" lmao. I heard that they submit pictures of a man making a sandwitch for credits . Yeah a loooot of potential here. Women are an absolute mandatory in police force cuz who else would handle female criminals who sue men even police men at the mere touch of her wrists to cuff them ? You can tell I donno sociology? Well I can tell you don't have any real world knowledge on how things actually work. You are so wrapped up in your own delusions that you re…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:17 PM
1

Literally every comment you make makes aless and less sense than the previous one. How exactly is a PhD in gender studies gonna help in carpenter job or coding job ? Your entire comment is filled with unreasonable words but the last word about gender neutral that I truly agree on. In this world all laws and recruitment procedures and joining criteria should be gender neutral and race neutral. The only exceptions are for physically challenged and economically backward people. Also why do you keep…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:35 PM
1

In 1985 the NDP adopted a target of 50 percent women among its candidates at federal elections. It has also adopted (and is enforcing) a policy whereby, in each federal riding, at least one woman must be in the running at the nomination stage In 1993 the LPC set a target to elect 25 percent women. Under the Employment Equity Act, the government is required to strive to meet representation levels, based on estimated workforce availability, for the four employment equity designated groups: women, …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:18 PM
1

What do you mean underperforming people don't get selected? You do know that the performance threshold to get selected is vastly different for men and women right ? Urinals are a human necessity and not exclusive to men. Please do tell me what exactly did all organisations provides to make it helpful for men only ? That doesn't have logical resoning behind which directly contributes to bring more efficient? Go ahead. Also are you saying women don't need urinals ? And please don't say stupid thin…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:28 PM
1

Notice how none of the things you said about men cost even a cent to implement? This is why i said it's much more efficient and easier to employ men than for others. Do you even realise how much budget is needed for all the things you said ? And all that for what ? An underperforming cadet who require many breaks and many rules to be kept in mind before giving orders ? And all this before even getting into the sexual harassment scenarios and risks. Also the goal of any organisation should be to …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:06 PM
1

So you are ignoring your own phrases now ? What about the last sentence. Something about removing the barrier. Tell me how is the govt doing that ? What's the most famous or popular thing that the govt did to "remove the barrier" ? That's right they implement the guilty until proven innocent regarding men system for anything regards to women and men interrelated issues. They implement the quota system where a certain percentage has to be women and other minority. How exactly is that not discrimi…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:35 PM
1

"no quotas in the sense of hiring people for being minority". "Track how many minority a company has, make sure to privilege the minority groups". Yes you are making perfect sense and there are definitely no contradictory statements in your comments. /S
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:24 PM
1

I meant the quotas.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 09:12 AM
1

LMAO. Canada doesn't have reservations , this is the most ridiculous statement you have ever said in this convo.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:14 AM
1

And where exactly do you live ?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:19 AM
1

Again with the damn picture. That is not enough representation of how the "equity" you are talking about is working. Things like reservations are due to this stupid equity. So if men and women are equal now and can do any jobs then why exactly do women still need the reservations? It was initially set to encourage women into education and then into workplace. Now there are plenty of women in workspace , infact there are more women graduating and doing college than men. So why exactly do women st…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:17 PM
1

No, do you even know what you are talking about ? What you are saying is equality. Equal opportunity is equality, equal outcome is equity. Starting line is opportunity, ending line is outcome.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 07:07 PM
1

You not making any sense the more you comment. As I said earlier you are very proficient at making over the top utopian claims and demand they be achieved so that there won't be any criticism against it. Obviously it would be wonderful if organization were that unbiased. But organization can only be unbiased in equality route. The entire premise of equity is based on being biased against different people. Showing unwarranted bias with good intentions is still called discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:54 PM
1

How, how exactly would it do that ? When 90% of all organisations are failing at doing even the most basic jobs properly how exactly are you thinking that they would be able to provide equity for all genders ? See this us exactly why I hate extreme left people. They talk about such dreams and non achievable goals when in reality they are just as much self serving as any other organisation.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:06 PM
1

Are you friggin serious ? Is that truly how you think equality and equity differ ? Equity forces people to be 50/50 in everything meaning even if a women doesn't 2ant to be mechanical engineer and even if a man doesn't want to be doctor they will be forced to do that to maintain the 50/50 scale. It can be done in various ways like employing reservations and not allowing anymore men than how many women are joining the course same in doctor course if the men are in shortage then only those many wo…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 05:16 AM
1

Isn't gender equity the very definition of not having freedom to choose ? We should strive for gender equality not gender equity. And if you are soo pro equity then It should either be full equity or full equality not a hybrid version that's only helpful for one set of people at the expense of others. We are striving for gender equity in top level management positions and following equality for jobs that require hard work.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 05:03 AM
1

Ahh yes give an overexagerqted and very difficult to achieve solution to a problem so that there won't be anything to criticize, in well aware of this tactic. It's like saying to build nuclear powered bikes when talking about pollution.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:39 AM
1

Absolutely agree with you. But weren't you the one saying that in the current world where everyone can work everything? So why aren't women working in the bottom as well ? You can't expect to be at the top without working in the bottom. It is as ridiculous as the new eu ANOTHER reservation which states women should make 40% of upper glass cealing employees but no law has been passed to make sure these women were also working from the starting positions, only management. This clearly shows how fr…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:04 AM
1

But it also shows that disproportionate amount of men at the bottom. This is also a remain from "patriarchy" as it allows women the luxury to not be working in those extremely dangerous and exploitative works like minning and sewage works. Are you choosing to ignore this ? Or are you legitimately ignorant of this ?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:44 AM
1

And the percentage of men working in bottom are also extremely disproportionate to those working at the top.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:40 AM
1

Men also work at the bottom disproportionately. If you only look at top you will slip and fall.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:10 AM
2

We unfortunately don't live in utopia. We are still living in what I would like to call a concealed dystopia. The west won't be able to implement all these progressive rules and workers union if there isn't a massive labour exploitation going on in Asia. Weather we like it or not it is fact that West has long since stopped being efficient. It has also implement many rules to not be exploitative unfortunately maybe as you said as a remnant of patriarchy they are still oppressive towards men as th…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 06:50 AM
3

That is exactly what i have been saying as well. Yes the pattern came out, but there wasn't any better solution out there. Giving reservation to one gender at the expense of other gender or seeing one gender as inherently evil than other are definitely not a solution to this pattern. It will just lead to another gender revolution and men's revolution would lead to much more dangerous consequences to society than women revolution called feminism. This is very dangerous for our civilization. Just …
/r/MensRights15/06/22 06:26 AM
2

So you want me to tell you all the matriarchial animal kingdoms and how friggin cruel /inefficient they are ? Excluding the top of the chain species like ants of honeybees that rely solely on exploiting everyone to highest possible ways and so surviving there are very few matriarchial species that survived evolution. The survival itself can be of proof that patriarchy is efficient than matriarchy. Weather they are moral/good is an entirely different issue. Just look at lions for example, biggest…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 06:17 AM
7

Yeah patriarchy survived cuz it is more easy and efficient to exploit men than women. Not cuz they want to opress women or some other negative forces. Women used to give birth to 8-12 children back then cuz half of them would die for unknown reasons. It would take atleast 2-3 years from the beginning of pregnancy to again being a efficient worker. Why would anyone waste precious resource for education on someone who would be out of commision for half of thier life ? Do you even know how few memb…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:51 AM
3

You are confusing between a govt/ruling body and patriarchy. By default patriarchy should never hurt men and matriarchy should never hurt women. The world runs on exploitative nature. Doesn't matter if it's patriarchy or matriarchy. Everyone will be explained one way or another and men get exploited wayy more than women in a big picture. There were many matriarchial societies around the world why do you think they didn't survive ? Cuz they were not as efficient. You can't just blame everything o…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:41 AM
3

The patriarchy thing. It's just a way of forming community. Patriarchy is not inherently evil and oppressive anymore than matriarchy. It's not like any and all matriarchial societies were all sunshine and rainbows lm the world simply runs if survival of fittest and patriarchy won the rivalry that is all there is to it. The govt punishing a female criminal is not patriarchy anymore than govt punishing a male victim as matriarchy. Same with correcting a person's twisted beliefs and wrong facts tha…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:32 AM
32

Men are only allowed to express emotions when it's beneficial to others, preferably women.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:11 AM
2

I do absolutely agree with you. It is unfair and wrong to do such things. Unfortunately the law can't even ve applied to these special people so uk us instead sacrificing the remaining men to make its women feel false sense if security.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:31 AM
2

First I want to clarify that I in no way am defending how misandrist uk is towards men but what they are doing is somewhat understandable considering how many many girls and young women are being kidnapped or harassed by a certain group of people and being brainwashed. Since they are not able to do anything against them they are taking revenge on entire gender which obviously is not fair.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:11 AM
2

It's not fighting, it's fought. Just like how 2nd wave generation was right in what they did the left also did some right thing previously. I don't see any major labour movement backed by left.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:53 AM
4

When did they say this ? Was it when amber stated saying those allegations or was it after most of the evidence went viral ?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:50 AM
2

What you said will never happen as long as govt is most eager to pander to these feminazi demands and willing to do anything they ask. And the govt will continue to do so as discrimination against men is one of the most popular way to get popularity and votes from female.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:55 PM
5

Absolutely fair. Although I think the reservation themselves are far from effective and would only work against the efficiency of the work, if the reservations have to be Implemented then the only fair way is to make the reservation available to all the major population and not just one half of population. Also what exactly do you mean by track record of EU ? There were reservation for men somewhere in equal amounts to women ? Like in nurses or teachers ? Or in psychology or art or journalism ? …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:51 PM
9

It does have to be like that. If not then it would just be plain discrimination. Also why you bringing your anecdote evidence and act like it's representative of all recruiters? There should be fixed rules and clear reasons to why something was implemented and not hypocritical reasons. You giving 40% reservations to one most percentage gender ? Give 40% reservations to the other gender as well. You giving addition reservations for fields in which one gender is heavily dominant do that for all fi…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:35 PM
1

Why do you keep cherry picking and repeating the same thing over and over ? I have said many and reasons regards to this. I have said that stem fields require hard work, intellect and are less prone to showing bias. This is applicable to both men and women. If a women later solves the battery issue (biggest scientific problem we are currently facing) are finds a new mathematical theorem then neither nen not women or even king of the world can say that she is wrong. Because it's science and maths…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 02:18 PM
1

Health care does come under stem field though. What exactly are you talking about ?
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:04 AM
1

OMG it's an goddamn example. It doesn't matter weather the profession I use there is journalism or sewage cleaner or doctor or influencer.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:43 AM
1

The burden of proof doesn't lay on those that question the claim. You are the one stating ther is immense bias in stem fields compared to every other field. I'm simply questioning as to what changed ? Every field was once men's field. But they all changed and many women were working in many fields except stem fields. Every man must've been sexist and must have "sexually harassed" women when they first arrived at thier jobs in fields like journalism and management or art. So why do you think men …
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:29 AM
1

Are you a broken record who only repeats the same thing again and again ? You are not providing anything if value anywhere. Did you even read my previous comments ?
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:06 AM
4

Cuz in fields like journalism and management hard work doesn't always pays off. Nepotism or representation reservations and favorism are much more prevalent in such fields. I also said that there is less ways to show bias in STEM fields did you choose to ignore that ir something? You do know that it is infact true that majority of labour work is done my men right ? Literally any data will prove that true. Why do you think that is ? Is it cuz women don't wanna work hard ?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:52 PM
4

Where did you get all these beliefs in my statement ? Are you a psychologist or something? If not why should I trust your judgement? Also I already gave you an answer as to why there is way less bias in stem fields than in other fields. If you want to disprove me then do answer the question of why every other field other than stem field has seen massive increase in women percentile ? Every field was once men field. I'm sure all men do the "harassment" or "gatekeep" or whatever it is that YOU are…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:38 PM
6

Are you even reading what I wrote ? Or were you too busy in writing your own narrative everytime ?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:13 PM
6

Why indeed. I guess your question answers itself.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:37 PM
5

No, I never said that. I said in stem fields hard works most times does pay off unlike in fields like management where politics and quotas/reservations play more active role.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:28 PM
7

Everything was once male dominated workforce. Why do you think stem fields remain mostly that way unlike other fields like art ? Cuz in stem fields majority of times hard work pays off and will always be in demand cuz most people can't handle them.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:10 PM
2

I think in majority of the world atleast in 2022 the situation is similar with there being more women than men. And i suspect COVID and other wars being one of the core reasons behind it. When compared to who was more sacrificed to do jobs even in peak of wuhanvirus and continued to do so throughout the period are obviously men more than women.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:10 AM
24

And that is probably one of the reasons boys tend to be more inclined in stem fields cuz in majority of subjects like in physics and maths you literally can't show any bias as long as the student didn't screw up.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:40 AM
6

I was pointing out the joke in it. Obviously we gotta survive anyway we can.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 07:03 PM
1

When you do file charges make your gf do it bro.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 07:01 PM
8

Careful bro. Psuedo feminists will search your history single out your comment saying "use the system against itself" and tag you as "typical incel" and will blame every criminal who has ever used system for their benefit as misogynist incel regardless of his sexual status.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 06:59 PM
5

I like how you have conveniently left out that the reason all these women "claim" porn is abusive towards them never mention about the money issue and say it in the framework of objectifying their body and fetishizing certain women. But when it comes to onlyfans and twitch it is very evident that nobody is actually forcing them to do such stuff and that they have no issue with objectifying themselves and someone fetishizing them. Sewage workers complaining about smell of sewage is just as ridicu…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:36 PM
2

Did the women achieve thier privileges and rights by being the budhas ? No. They achieved that at the expense of other half of population i.e men. Look i get what you are saying and in an ideal world what you should is the standard that everyone shouod follow and aspire to be like. But when the sexist and favorism is balant towards men and women and you can't expect others to critique against it. Lemme give you an example, In india until recently adultry is a criminal offence but only for men. M…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:26 AM
4

I guess all the husband who walked out on their families by saying they are just going out to buy cigarettes and never coming back did "nothing wrong" as well. How can you judge she doesn't know her husband is not in jail ? How exactly are you giving more benefit if doubt to s Cheater and someone who elopes on her marriage without any notice ? For someone like that it's not too far fetched to ask her family to accuse her husband of murder so she doesn't get branded as Cheater and eloper in socie…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:12 AM
4

Hey I'm all for protecting the privacy Nd rebuilding thier lives. And an absolute sucker for innocent until proven guilty. But HATE hypocracy. Go check any domestic violence/dowry cases against men and 95% of time there won't be any privacy if not just him but his entire family as well. You can't expect someone to uphold sane values to others when they are denied them. We are normal humans and not some Buddhist saints.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:09 AM
2

Please check my comment history. I'm too tired to say the same thing again and again.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:04 AM
12

Yes i was openly arguing against many that are still supporting the women and her family and blaming it on the country. And some of mine got removed and some downvotedd and very few upvoted. Edit : aand i just got banned from the sub for "sexism" without pointing out where exactly.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:01 AM
1

I already agreed on this one. Not having a father is really bad on child upbringing. But having a father and him not teaching anything to you or fulfil his role is also very damaging. What do you mean bring called toxic doesn't do any damage? Why would anyone continue doing something if even thier loved ones call that action as toxic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:21 AM
5

Yeah cuz if there was any proven side effect then such pills wouldn't even be approved. Basically most such studies are societal and psychological rather than medical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:44 PM
1

Oops lemme correct it. A simple 'nt changed the whole meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 05:28 PM
1

Does that mean men can expect women to pay child support if they got the custody ? Also were you married ? Before you both broke up ? How did court order him for child support when he can't even support himself ?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 05:15 PM
0

As long as the effect if those pills are still in effect they are less attracted to masculinity than normal. And if they not taking any pills then they are more attracted to masculinity than normal the closer they are to menstrual cycle. It didn't specify how pills will affect the kater phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:51 PM
2

I think there was some study in this. That the more recently a women has taken any kind of birth control or menstrual control pill the less attracted she is towards masculine men. While if not taking any kind of harmonal pill, then the closer she is to menstrual cycle the more she would be attracted to masculinity. Basically those pills mess up thier preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:42 PM
1

And that is your opinion. Attractiveness is vastly subjective. A 7 who checks all the boxes for you will be far more attractive than a 10 who doesn't check any boxes but is regarded as the perfect man/women Beauty wise. You seem to not have understood what i said. Throughout history men taught men how to be like men and women taught women how to be like women. But with last few decades most of what men taught were being considered toxic and women's way of living were taught to men. Which doesn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 04:13 AM
2

What would the presence of father do if everytime he tries to show masculinity he is called toxic ? I do agree on the problem of rise in fatherless families though. Well sexual revolution gave all the freedom with no responsibilities so it was only a matter of time I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 12:57 PM
1

Yeah this sub has made me highly defensive towards members of this sub. I think i gotta leave this sub before I become more radical.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:18 AM
1

If not then what's the point of saying"easier said than done" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:16 AM
1

If you not gonna believe what i said then why even ask ? I know it's easier said than done. I have seen what being in such scenario would do to your psyche. And i still believe that is the right way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:49 AM
1

As I said I would try to find out why she is doing so. If there is a genuine valid issue and there is nothing I can do about it then i would just accept that this as my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:41 AM
1

Yes I agree with you. Except for the less than 10% get alimony thing. Marrying close to income is even more ridiculous claim. If wife makes just as much as husband then obviously she wouldn't get any alimony. Unless ofcourse if she is staying in marital home they bought together then the home will belong to her. All if these laws work very good in theory but in practicality wife get wayyy more favorable position than the husband. Most couples do work today. But they definitely are not same in ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:11 AM
1

I feel like you misunderstood. I am saying your entire post can be summarised as validation from others and especially from other gender feels good. Whatever the scenario might be. Weather they engage in intellectual convo with you or weather they engage in gym activities or outdoor activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 05:07 AM
1

There is an "IF" before I started that statement. I hope you can understand what "IF" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:35 PM
1

I am in another continent. And i am in a dating pool of like minded people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:25 PM
0

What's normal to you isn't normal throughout the world. There are plenty if other religions and plenty of other cultures. America and Europe aren't "the world" and they definitely don't dictate what normal for rest of the 5 continents.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:06 PM
0

And this is exactly what i was talking about. Any semblance of criticism towards female promiscuous and its effect would result in backlash that include senseless insults and be called insecure no matter what they say. Do you even know the meaning of preference? I wouldn't really fuck with a Stacy on sight so why should I be forced to accept a women who fucks Chad on sight ? And or be called as a insecure pedo otherwise ? People who have casual sex and regular ons don't GAF. People who don't do …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 01:23 PM
1

You went to a lot of trouble to say "validation from others especially opposite gender feels very good".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 01:07 PM
1

Just stating how the world works. Women who fucks chada on sight won't really be gf or relationship materiel in the eyes of other men. So they pretend to be otherwise and commit lie of omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 01:02 PM
1

Are you saying if the women is living in the marital house (the house that they bought after marriage) then the law could evict her forcefully? Cuz I didn't read a singke instance of that happening. There is some law along the line aif right to shelter or something. I'm glad that you are aware that alimony can be paid lumpsum but all the people here claiming alimony only for 10% of divorce rates aren't exactly considering the lumpsum as alimony. I wonder since when does family law not work like …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 12:03 PM
5

Unless she was like this from the beginning in which case we wouldn't even be together, then no i wouldn't divorce my wife. if she became like that due to some valid reason then i wouldn't divorce her, I would take her to councling and try to get treatment to what's causing her to be like that since she wasn't like that previously. If she manipulated/tricked me until we get married then that does count as abuse of trust though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:56 AM
0

There is no need to bring up thier promiscuous history if they weren't pretending to be otherwise. Men or women doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:50 AM
1

Wtf you mean don't have alimony?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:41 AM
0

What you guys consider alimony is monthly payments only. But alimony also means the lumpsum amount that the husband pays his wife just once and be done with her and this is something that u guys are not considering as alimony for some reason. If a guy is worth 10 million(including his future inheritance,his solo assets earned before marriage, bank accounts etc) then in lumpsum he would have to give 3-5 million to the wife(not considering marital assets i.e assets earned during the course of marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:39 AM
1

And i see that as an absolute win. Women should not be forced to make career sacrificing decision except for the first 2-3 years of child birth. And i sincerely wish they would extend paternity leave as much as maternity leave so husband can provide assistance to thier wives during and after pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:38 AM
1

What you guys consider alimony is monthly payments only. But alimony also means the lumpsum amount that the husband pays his wife just once and be done with her and this is something that u guys are not considering as alimony for some reason. If a guy is worth 10 million(including his future inheritance,his solo assets earned before marriage, bank accounts etc) then in lumpsum he would have to give 3-5 million to the wife(not considering marital assets i.e assets earned during the course of marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:36 AM
0

Unfortunately prenup is invalid is many many countries. And even in countries where it is valid there are plenty cases where prenup is thrown out the window for more "equal" judgement. Your decision is the right one but the entity that enforces the decision is the corrupt one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:36 AM
0

Oh really ? Ok. But this just proves my point though. If the op of the comment is wildly different and will have to pay alimony to the husband then she does come under exception and not the "rule".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:33 AM
0

What you guys consider alimony is monthly payments only. But alimony also means the lumpsum amount that the husband pays his wife just once and be done with her and this is something that u guys are not considering as alimony for some reason. If a guy is worth 10 million(including his future inheritance,his solo assets earned before marriage, bank accounts etc) then in lumpsum he would have to give 3-5 million to the wife(not considering marital assets i.e assets earned during the course of marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:30 AM
2

What you guys consider alimony is monthly payments only. But alimony also means the lumpsum amount that the husband pays his wife just once and be done with her and this is something that u guys are not considering as alimony for some reason. If a guy is worth 10 million(including his future inheritance,his solo assets earned before marriage, bank accounts etc) then in lumpsum he would have to give 3-5 million to the wife(not considering marital assets i.e assets earned during the course of marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:28 AM
0

What career exactly are you in ? Also are you saying that you would probably be financially more ahead than your spouce if you get married ? And so hence alimony is moot point for you cuz it would be you who have to pay him ? What you guys consider alimony is monthly payments only. But alimony also means the lumpsum amount that the husband pays his wife just once and be done with her and this is something that u guys are not considering as alimony for some reason. If a guy is worth 10 million(in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:26 AM
1

They fare worse than men financially in a divorce but such women would fare much much worse if they didn't marry at all. A barista marrying a business owner then divorcing him will get half or less than half of his business. If she got less than half then that means she fared badly in divorce. Now if she didn't marry at all then she wouldn't get anything. Do you see the fault in your logic now ?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:19 AM
-2

But this is an exception. Majority of times it is the husband who is earning more than the wife. And the anecdotal example provided in this comment is nothing but an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:16 AM
1

The issue is the court will say the husband owes the wife her sahw years where she could be working and building career even if the decision was the women's to be a sahw.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:14 AM
2

Finally someone with brain. I feel the same way and about the divorce issue as well. The only times a divorce should be seriously considered is when there is abuse(real abuse not the kind where a spouse refuses to spend half the yearly income on new shoes for a party and get labled as financial abuse) and infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:08 AM
-3

Great anecdotal evidence which doesn't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:02 AM
2

You are literally claiming the opposite of what RP advocate. This only means you have extreme narrow view of red pill ideology/cherry picking what you what and disregarding very important parts/have very little exposure to what RP is but pretend otherwise. RP accepts hypergamy is real and are constantly striving and pushing others to strive so they become the top 20%. Do they approve of hypergamy? Obviously not. It's a shitty system, doesn't mean they don't play the game in a way that it benefit…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:51 AM
3

Lol what kind of shitty gatekeeping is this ? I have been working since I was 16 years. I have lived on my own for 4 years then came back to my parents house to take care of them financially and be helpful in day-to-day works. What's this real world experience? By your logic only 50-60 year old people that are retired can comment on world life balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:42 AM
1

Lol I'm a 24 yo engineer myself so not much difference. But I most probably will not go for partner in medical/law enforcement (cops/lawyers). So each fir thier own I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:19 AM
2

Lol people here would be like #EVERYTHING
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:17 AM
2

Great anecdotal example which doesn't provide shit. Not to mention some heavy baseless judgement as well. Well aren't you an intellectual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:15 AM
1

Absolutely agree with you if she has the same principles for everyone since the beginning. The problem only arises if she was having ons left and right throughout her teenage and young adult age and then suddenly starts being careful by not having sex with men who won't marry them. It's not crime or anything but just not acceptable behaviour in men's eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:55 AM
2

Sure. Go block some roads or something then with your "opinion" that matters so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:35 AM
5

Nah unfortunately consent age is 18 for bith male and female. But min age for marriage is 21 or 23 for women.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 04:29 AM
0

How exactly women are going to be careful ? If not through lying by omission, or outright lying about who they used to be if they were promiscuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:21 AM
2

On the scale of history you opinion really doesn't matter. Even now in the eyes of govt/corporation/tinder/anything big, people are nothing but a number. And people be used as a commodity. Is that wrong ? Absolutely. Will people stop doing it ? Probably not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:19 AM
0

It's really not a mystery to find out if she wasn't pretending to be something else. Which is why members here saying she should reveal if she was highly promiscuous. If she doesn't reveal it herself early on and he finds out some other way it will only worsen the break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:17 AM
0

As I said earlier it was supposed to be in third person. What I should have written is "if a man ghosts a women" . Why do you think that way ? Do you think all women have very interesting and fun personalities and all are gf material ? Maybe he found Nazi poster in her bedroom , maybe she was a single mom which he didn't know earlier(nothing wrong with wen not disclosing they are moms if the goal is ons) or she could just have a bland personality. Post nut clarity is a thing. How can you say abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:14 AM
1

I already told you. Just because they don't want to be seen that way wouldn't mean they aren't that way if they are promiscuous. Not acting on desires is one thing but giving in to temptation then just not talking about it is "lie by omission".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:09 AM
1

What ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:38 PM
0

Ther are plenty of way to know especially in a LTR, but outing it aside by saying" there is no way to know" are you implying that people should build relationships on lies and false persona ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:37 PM
1

I kept my comment in a third person view as much as possible and if I said "you" immediately i also said she and not you. But now I'm talking in first person , you must be really secure if you get offended and think it's about you when I wrote it in third person view.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:36 PM
1

Something being degratory doesn't make it not true. If some person hates a certain race then they are racist. Obviously nobody also want to be seen as racist doesn't mean they aren't one. Nobody likes a closet racist. Pretending to be someone else while being racist on the inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:34 PM
1

I don't think the guy who don't want to have sex on first date are the guys who also want casual sex. You are making women into two groups promiscuous and non promiscuous but are lumping up all men into one group. If the women who is having casual sex has casual sex as her main goal then i dont how she can complain when men also have casual sex as main goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:29 PM
2

As many thers have said most men wouldn't really have an issue if women were always witholding intimacy until they find a proper partner. It only when she was very promiscuous in her teen and 20's but then suddenly pretend to be miss prim to trap men that we have issue with. She made her choice and she has to face the consequences of them. Being promiscuous means people who don't find promiscuity attractive will be out of your date zone. Same thing applies for men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:17 PM
2

Probably cuz it's true ? Look whoever you are wear it with pride. If someone is a slut then why pretend to be something else to fool someone into being in a relationship with you ? Which has high chance if ending in divorce if he finds out about your past ? Well that is also in her favor cuz she would get free alimony that way. Weather we like it or not currnt society is heavily rigged against men and is active encouraging to cheat and manipulate/exploit men for all they can. Same is happening t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:13 PM
1

Careful ? You mean lie and commit fraud on what they are like ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:10 PM
1

If they witholding sex with everyone and have always been like that then majority of men don't really mind waiting for her to be comfortable enough to engage in intimacy. It is only when she is one thing but pretends to be another that we get irritated and feel cheated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:09 PM
0

This is exactly what op is talking about. A lot of women aren't as interesting or funny as they think they are. If man ghosts you after sex it only means she is not good for anything except sex or that not even sex with her is good. Same applies for men as well if men get ghosted after casual sex or that he is only good for sex(if happens regularly) or that he is not even good for sex (if happens regularly with strangers)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:05 PM
1

A lot men also won't see a women as gf or wife material if she has ons previously but is witholding being intimate with him because she sees him as Later material.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:00 PM
1

Hey as long as she is open about waiting long for being intimate and provide a valid reason for it then i don't think most men would have that much of an issue with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:58 PM
1

Obviously true. She is under no obligation to have sex or engage in intimacy with a guy she is considering fir LTR when she has ons and FWB previously. Just like the man is also not obliged to tolerate the hypocritical behaviour of hers which rewards bad behaviour and punished good behaviour. Obviously he might also not know how adventurous she was sexually prior to him if she hides her past away as it makes her less valuble in the eye of "most men looking for Later"(not all just those select fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:39 PM
3

Same applies to a baby. Many failing relationship double down by bringing a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:18 PM
7

You should try reading some psychology and history. People can be and have always been treated as a commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:15 PM
5

Yes but that's the norm and the issue here isn't it ? Men do respond to even mundane and uninteresting messages by women. Would humanity be much better without those kind of people and if they gave themselves some respect ? Absolutely. But people do stupid things when horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:07 PM
5

You mean they are behaving like a women ? I mean I wonder why though is it perhaps possible because masculinity is discouraged and punished in every stage of life ?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:41 AM
4

Men used to put in way more "effort" to show that they can provide safety and security to women. Now one wrong assumption and you will be labled misogynist who is looking down on a women. Not to mention women can get the safety and security on thier own now so the "effort" you speaking of is not the one that women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:39 AM
1

That is why I said "If" .
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:53 PM
1

Harems are common. Weather the person who is part of it knows or not us another issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:31 PM
1

Yes and that is exactly what happened throughout history. We have twice as many female ancestors than make ancestors.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:30 PM
1

What you describing is basically what I think happened throughout history. Men were the minority and women were the majority. Biggest reason for that is war but plenty of other reasons as well like almost all of life threatening things (except for stuff exclusive to women) were handled by men. So obviously plenty of them died. And plenty of women died as well in cases like pregnancy but compared to men the number is quite low. Hence why men have multiple wives or remarriage for men more common t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:20 PM
0

Also if he was on the recieving end of gay sex for 3000 times with different people he would be needing adult diapers. So obviously lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:15 PM
4

Lmao. I thought the sane thing like what's the point if focusing on the number when after a certain threshold number like 30-50 it's all the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:14 PM
9

Cheating and abusing i get it. But what does getting fat has to do with it ? Especially for women, you should never expect pregnant women to start to get in shape until atleast the kid crosses 5 years. Although not fair the sane should go for husband as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:50 AM
2

Strong and independent
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:29 AM
1

Look majority of women are not even in working sector. Cuz if they were then there would already be equal members of both genders in work place everywhere. So earning equally by puting in all those or entire and sacrificing personal life will take some decades St the very least. There are exceptions of ofcourse. But you have to understand something that for every women /man in powerful position there are 100's of men who are equally qualified but couldn't get that position then there are maybe 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 10:27 AM
1

You see there are also so many happy couples who are married. But nobody ever discusses them cuz that's what it is supposed to be. Its the problematic ones that are discussed. And there are plenty problematic ones and are only increasing day by day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 09:31 AM
1

You mean someone who is not like you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:28 AM
1

It realllllly feels like you guys are all a lot more interested in focusing on the not being together part than on the being together part. Basically what's happening here is one guy points out sun raises in the east and you are saying sun doesn't raise in the east it is us who are revolving around sun. Both these statements are true but you saying second statement like as if first one doesn't occur.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:54 AM
1

"young " is the priority here. There are more sexless women because undatable people (temp) like single mothers are increasing at an exponential rate. Obviously no 20 year old guy would want to be with a 20 year old gal if she already has a 5 year old child.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:27 AM
2

I thought it was proven plenty of times that women do all those make ups for themselves and to show off to other girls and not men. For example if your bf or husband asks you to not do anything of those as you were saying that you are putting in all those efforts to impress men and now that you already got him you don't need to out in that effort then would you stop ? Would you not get your hair,nails,waxes, make up and clothing done ? Most Probably not. So why would you say you are doing all th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:24 AM
1

Yes , not one cent from your parents either. You maybe an exception. But majority of divorces women getting the alimony (won't be happening if she wasn't a leech and worked a goddamn job) and single mothers getting govt support shows than many women do feel entitled to money they didn't earn themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter