TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Avalon81204 Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Avalon81204 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Im proud to say that so does my 7 year old son. and if he ever has a sister, she will too.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:36 PM
1

http://news.menshealth.com/is-your-circumcision-making-you-soft/2011/11/02/ http://sciencenordic.com/male-circumcision-leads-bad-sex-life
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:07 PM
1

That wikipedia is controlled by a man named Brian Morris, google him. And that "study" was only 42 men. Not a study at all. Less nerves=less feeling. Thats a fact. Keritization of the glans(head) happens to all circumcised men over time. Which leads to less feeling.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:12 AM
3

Both of those statements are completely wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:03 AM
3

The point is a circumcised penis is lacking a part which it needs to function normally. Which is why circumcision increase the risk of ED by 4.5 times, and pain for women with circumcised partners nearly 400%.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:02 AM
2

None of thoe studies have ever been done in a first world setting or hold up to real world data. IE: America which has one of the highest circumcision rates also has one of the highest STD transmission rates, while countries in Europe have some of the smallest circumcision rates and some of the lowest STD transmission rates. And for the death thing. 9 times out of 10 the cause of death isnt listed as circumcision, its hemorrhage. THYMOS: Journal of Boyhood Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring 2010, 78…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:00 AM
1

Its not if I say so, the facts say so.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:36 AM
1

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/penilecancer/detailedguide/penile-cancer-prevention http://news.menshealth.com/is-your-circumcision-making-you-soft/2011/11/02/ You're just wrong. And most men are not circumcised.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:29 AM
1

I dont understand why you where downvoted. Its true. "Oh I got beat with a belt and I turned out fine. So that must be good punishment, so I'll do it to my kids too. " "Oh my dick is cut, and Im fine, so I'll have my kids dick cut too."
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:47 AM
1

Circumcised men are 5 times more likely to have erectile dysfunction. Even the Cancer Society has said circumcision DOES NOT reduce cancer, and no most men who have had the YEARS of desensitization caused by circumcision enjoy sex less.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:44 AM
1

Because no one else owns your body. There fore no one can make permanent, non medically emergent changes without your consent.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:42 AM
1

And parents dont get to pick what healthy, normal, body parts their kids get to keep.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:38 AM
1

They cant, say, make them get a tattoo, have a toe removed, or appendix removed, without emergent medical need.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:37 AM
1

What other healthy, normal, body part can parents choose to have surgically removed from children?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:36 AM
3

So If I give into my husbands begging, or he mine, that's rape to you?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:29 AM
4

So If we have this conversation... Him: let's have sex Me: not tonight. Him: come on babe please? Me: fine. Is that what you consider rape?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:59 PM
7

So when I'm not in the mood but my husband talks me into sex, he's raping me? No. Get off your high horse. Women are capable of changing their minds you know.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:10 PM
2

Think of his foreskin as bimbo repellent.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:54 PM
1

True. It can be anywhere on the shaft, so sometimes a full cut is needed. But this is * extremely* rare.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:40 AM
1

Theres a condition where the opening is on the shaft and not the tip, so a circumcision is required so the infant can urinate.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:23 AM
-2

1 woman sleeps with one man, that same man sleeps with 5 women, or vise verse. Get it now?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:27 AM
1

Read this.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:08 AM
1

Well thats really only in America or predominantly Jewish or Muslim countries.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:01 PM
1

Guess I just inferred. Sorry.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:55 AM
1

And you rather they didnt?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:37 AM
1

No. A lot of religious places don't want their insurance to even cover birth control.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:36 AM
1

And this is the one doctors say is LESS painful!
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:54 PM
1

But what if you didnt know the other person was afraid?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:45 AM
1

And they dont even realize its actually easier to clean an intact penis ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:11 PM
2

Glans kertinization is exactly what I'm talking about. That doesnt happen to intact men.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:26 PM
5

The eye has 40,000 nerve endings, foreskin has around 70,000.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:14 PM
3

Your hand (glans penis) would still feel more than if it hadn't been exposed all that time.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:12 PM
4

Think of your hand. Imagine you live your entire life with a glove on. Then at say 16-20 years old, you take it off and start touching stuff. Your hand would be able to feel more then a hand that hadn't been covered.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:45 AM
14

The foreskin contains 20,000–70,000 erogenous nerve endings, the majority of which are concentrated in the ridged band, which encircles the inner opening of the foreskin. When the penis is flaccid, the nerve endings are protected but, when erect, they are exposed. Circumcision removes about three-fourths of the nerve endings in the penis.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:58 AM
10

Yup, yes it does. 20,000 nerve endings. More than any other pleasure specific body part on a human, male or female.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:41 AM
9

Well it does remove the single most sensitive part of the male body.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:20 AM
22

I was actually aware of this right when it happened on FB. It was 100% real. The girl had a real full fledged FB profile with seemingly real life friends. Though she may have been trolling.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:19 AM
2

Then the same is true of men.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:25 PM
1

Most of the stories are from American men. Most doctors do not know the proper care of an intact penis. Therefore incorrectly inform parents how to care for an intact son. Please read this blog outlining the basic care of an intact child.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:10 AM
9

Just show her a youtube video of it being done. If shes any kind of fit mother, she wont have it done then.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:12 PM
3

It would be immoral to take an infants appendix out while it was still perfectly healthy. A doctor would probably loose his medical license.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:10 PM
5

Has she given you a valid reason?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:06 PM
2

Because the children are still partially his responsibility. Just because Kate has money doesn't automatically make Jon not responsible for the 8 children he fathered.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:08 PM
4

So am I. But that wont happen without first educating the people making that choice and changing the general populations attitude about it.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:57 AM
3

You completly right. But as the law stands right now we need to work on educated more women on why they shouldn't do this. Then as the attitude about circumcision of the general population changes, so to will the laws, just like it did with FGM.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:52 AM
2

In an adult, its about the same amount of skin as a dollar bill(but thicker of course). Nope I dont know how it feels, but you are missing over 20,000 pleasure specific nerve endings.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:47 PM
2

Saying that makes it the best time also implies that when a women is drugged is the best time to rape her. I mean, she wont remember right? During infancy is the only time there is a chance for death, proper anesthesia cant be used, and having an open wound in a diaper is anything but sanitary.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:45 PM
4

Also why do you feel its best done in infancy? I mean its literally the worst time to have it done.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:33 PM
6

How many intact penis's have you smelt? And how do you figure it looks longer? Something was cut off that decreases the size and length. And yea sure it feels great, but you have no idea if it would feel better. But the argument here isnt whether or not circumcision is good. It whether or not cutting off a healthy body part of an unconsenting person without medical need, or that body part causing foreseeable complications should be legal.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:33 PM
9

What do you find useful about it?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:43 PM
4

Why? Women have a prepuce too, and ultimately have the final say over a boys circumcision.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:42 PM
3

Well since moms are the ones who get the final say, you would be thankful for the help.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:34 PM
3

Really? Its pretty much the motto for the anti RIC crowd. I have a bracelet that says it.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:33 PM
7

That is utterly disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:45 AM
1

Its the removal of a body part that is healthy. Whats "a strech" about that? Tonsils and adenoids are not removed until there is a problem. Hair grows back. Vaccines have proven, marked benefits for a child, where as circumcision has no benefits for a child, and kills over 100 neonatal boys every year in the US(more than car accidents and suffocation combined.) If foreskin here truly such a hindrance to health or hygiene, the 80% of men in the world who are intact would be lining up to get cut, …
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:18 PM
1

Right because any of those things could be considered bad or have life long effects. Circumcision is the ONLY amputation of a healthy body part on a healthy person, who can not consent. If a doctor did the exact same procedure to an adult without consent, they would go to jail.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:45 PM
69

Love it. xxlbs of GET YOUR FUCKING HANDS OFF MY DAUGHTER. Is the perfect way to described good dads
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:07 AM
1

Funny, that exactly what infant circumcision does.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 02:10 AM
3

Or by anyone other than a doctor.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:35 AM
3

She hid her pregnancy and received no medical care for herself or her child. She is solely responsible.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:56 PM
3

I didnt become an "intactavist" till after I was married but Im so glad my husband has a brain and can use it!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:23 PM
2

Sadly thats not true. Daughters genitals are protected by law.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:32 PM
3

If my husband refused to see logic and still wanted to circumcise our sons, honestly, he wouldnt be my husband much longer.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:31 PM
2

Its far from useless.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:29 PM
9

This girl is awesome. She is having twin boys any day now and people give her shit all the time for not circumcising them. But she sticks to her guns.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:21 PM
3

I am:)
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:01 AM
7

What? Is english your first language? Because you just murdered it. And religious freedom only applies to yourself. Circumcision forces a religious decision on someone else. The child has the right to religious freedom as well. Also, you cant have your daughter circumcised for religious reasons. There in lies the mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:55 PM
2

Since they do not own the child, nor the penis.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:37 PM
6

Because men dont have the right to decide what happens to their genitals but women do.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:36 PM
1

A study done by the AAP concluded that only about 55% of pediatricians used anesthesia, and only about 35% of OB/GYN's (who preform over 75% of circumcisions) used anesthesia. So a baby is more likely to have no anesthesia. And no baby is ever given any kind of pain management after wards.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:34 PM
1

Actually a study done by the AAP concluded that only about 55% of pediatricians used anesthesia, and only about 35% of OB/GYN's (who preform over 75% of circumcisions) used anesthesia. So a baby is more likely to have no anesthesia. And no baby is ever given any kind of pain management after wards. Can you imagine having part of your penis cut off then forced to let the open wound sit in feces and urine with no pain killers?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:33 PM
5

How is it not a men's rights issue? Women have a right to be the only ones who can decide what happens to their genitals, men do not.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:29 PM
3

Pretty sure sucking an infants penis is molestation.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:36 PM
11

I don't understand how a grown man sucking a babies dick can be anything other than sexual abuse. FTFY
/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:38 AM
8

She directly caused events that killed someone.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:28 PM
3

Parents cant make that choice for their daughters, so what gives them the right to make it for their sons? Legally speaking, you can't make laws based on gender. Thats discrimination. So when FGM was outlawed, so to was MGM. Thats why men who sue the doctors that circumcised them win. But since it's not in the text of law, and so many people make so much money off the surgery and its byproduct, its not enforced. And it is mutilation, by definition. mu·ti·late (mytl-t) tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·l…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:13 AM
6

Taking body parts of people who cant agree to it is a big deal.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:37 AM
3

Then get circumcised? You would lose 20,000 nerve endings though. The problem here isn't the actual circumcision, its who its being done to.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:34 AM
4

Unfortunately, that article says nothing of the functions of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:19 AM
5

Well none of what they told you is true. And it most certainly is not painless. 70% of children are given no anesthesia. And those who are given something, are most likely given a topical numbing cream, and no child ever receive post operation pain management.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:57 AM
5

To alter your child's genitals for aesthetic reasons is sexual abuse, plain and simple. And yes there is a medical difference. Your missing 20,000 nerve endings and are 5 times more likely to develop ED.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:54 AM
5

It does a lot.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:51 AM
5

No it't not.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:51 AM
1

Not if you have logic. One can logically concluded that with 20,000 less fine touch, pleasure signaling nerves, there is less sensation. In fact less nerves = less sensation. You can't argue that. Whether or not there is less pleasure will only be know to men circumcised after being sexually active, then being cut, then giving it a few decades. In every instance of that situation I have seen, the men have said they have less pleasure.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:17 PM
1

But that would very widely from person to person.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:46 PM
1

You cant scientifically measure pleasure.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:44 PM
1

In America its standard. In all other countries(minus extremely religious) the standard is an intact penis. The foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings. Those nerve endings are designed to send pleasure signals, while the nerves on the shaft and glans(head) of the penis are mainly designed to send pain signals. When you remove the foreskin you force the nerves on the shaft and glans to preform both functions, resulting in a lesser sensation. Studies have shown newborn feel more pain than adults b…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:52 AM
1

Ultrasound is nasty?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:47 PM
2

But when people are looking for parenting advice do they go to CNN.com or parenting.com?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 01:21 AM
2

Just for your info. The American cancer society has said that in no way does circ prevent penile cancer and that countries that dont cut have less cases of penile and cervical cancer. So there's that.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:42 PM
3

Those things are marked medical benefits, circumcision does not. Almost any doctor will tell you its purely cosmetic. And to make an infant suffer, for any amount of time, for a cosmetic surgery, is wrong. Do you pinch babies, just because its not a lot of pain and they wont remember?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:29 PM
7

no major anesthetics used Exactly
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:02 PM
5

She does have one though. The clitoral hood is the female foreskin.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:00 PM
6

Rule 34. There is such a thing as circumfetishes.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 02:36 PM
10

You're wrong. The father can do something about. He can get that child taken away from you for emotional neglect. And I hope he would. You would make a terrible parent.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 01:49 PM
1

This is true.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:12 PM
4

As a woman, I am ashamed to share an XX chromosome with you.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:49 PM
2

I know plenty of women how are happy to have their babies cut.(Jewish women for example) And in the end if she doesn't want her son cut, he can't be cut. As far as I'm aware only the mother can permit to it.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:44 PM
3

says who?
/r/MensRights31/12/11 08:39 PM
3

You have 20,000 less nerve endings. Less nerves = less feeling. Yes there are scars. Here are some comparison pics, obviously NSFW.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:22 AM
2

Those things have marked, proven benefits. Where as circumcision does not.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:18 AM
6

I was banned for telling them some facts. Go figure.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:27 AM
3

I physically wouldn't be able to let anyone who killed my kids walk away from me. I would snap uncontrollably.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:27 AM
1

No, No killing Hitler would not have been wrong. 1 life is not worth more than 6 million.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:25 AM
8

Proof?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:29 AM
1

The dumb is strong with this one ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:33 AM
7

I am a women myself and would use cunt when describing this vile woman.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:09 PM
3

you better hope your child is not 1 of the hundreds that die every year in America from circumcision.ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:26 PM
0

Your glands have only been exposed for a year. Where as most mens glands have been exposed their entire life. So you really cant compare.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 04:17 AM
-1

why not?
/r/MensRights10/10/11 04:14 AM
2

But the foreskin serves a purpose.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter