~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Why are generalizations like "all men are evil" normalized and why do some men internalize this guilt?You can google Gisele's case in France or the Nth Room in South Korea, among million others Classic, when you can't cite any more examples but you want to be seen as well-informed you can always add "etc." or "and millions more" or any other derivative after just citing two cases 👊😎 I don't know where that discussion happened so I can't say much else about it. But obviously, feminism is the dominant discourse, and said discourse says everything is the fault of men, so even if it's almost entirel… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 10:14 PM |
| 2 | Japan Has Expanded Science and Engineering Female Quotas In 38 National and Public Universities, Including Kyoto University and Osaka UniversityRemember that all-boys schools are almost non-existent nowadays at least in western and westernised countries because of them. Instead of promoting the existence of sex-segregated education, which would've been more logical, they decided they wanted to be in the same room with men, for some reason. And now they're complaining about not being represented enough. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 10:08 PM |
| 5 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesGen no correlation between how I prefer dressing and what I was saying, bit odd you’d bring that up I think it's obvious I say it as parody. To reiterate (because you omitted it): conservatives used self-report to validate the exgay identity. If you think self-report is valid then it means you validate that as well. And uf you don't, that'd be admitting what you describe as the "best method" is still dogshit. They're literally just "source: arial 12" ahh type evidence on their own. Self report g… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 10:22 PM |
| 6 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesit is reliable because self-reports are the most accurate way to capture crimes that victims are too afraid to report to the police. Conservatives used self-report to validate the exgay identity. A homophobic femboy, huh? If that's the most accurate method then we might as well conclude that no stat about those crimes is useful then (and it doesn't even make any sense; "they're reliable because participants respond to it" which really means nothing). And the molka pandemic was a real thing, so m… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 07:31 PM |
| 8 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesYes, while the 36% figure comes from all kinda of emotional abuse, sexual violence was the most prevalent type out of 7,027 women, This was also a government based survey, so it is very reliable unlike just a “regular survey” Still a survey, i.e., self-report. It's not like in the west surveys don't give similar results depending on the sample, and they're all the same, as in, there's no reason to believe in them. There was also the “Molka” (spycam) epidemic, where perpetrators (typically male) … | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 07:15 PM |
| 4 | They want to be oppressed so bad, in their heads a guy being attracted to them is just like anti-gay sentiment.That's why it makes no sense for them to say a guy feeling attracted to them is the equivalent of anti-gay sentiment. Not just that, but doing so should be considered an insult to the queer people (mainly POC) who live in countries where just by being born they're considered illegal. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 03:08 AM |
| 54 | They want to be oppressed so bad, in their heads a guy being attracted to them is just like anti-gay sentiment.It's funny you mention it because they'll also use "gay" to denigrate men that have opinions they loathe. "Gay" is like their most common pejorative next to saying "incel/virgin/[insert any variation to say you don't have sex]" even if the man in question never said anything against gays. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 03:01 AM |
| 5 | They want to be oppressed so bad, in their heads a guy being attracted to them is just like anti-gay sentiment.What's weird about this is that it's basically acknowledging that women can be, or very much are, heterophobic and will actively treat male attention the way a homophobic man would, and then either try to normalize it or pretend like this isn't a problem. I wouldn't say it's 'heterophobia' per se. Rather, it shows women (even presumably straight ones) think of men as a whole just like homophobic straight dudes think of gay men: NPCs that gross them out. They love giving incels/blackpillers evide… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 02:57 AM |
| 42 | They want to be oppressed so bad, in their heads a guy being attracted to them is just like anti-gay sentiment.Why feminism is pretty much the only "social cause" which foundations consist almost entirely of hoaxes? 😐 Being gay has been literally illegal in most countries throughout history, even today a lot of countries in Africa and Asia have either prison or death sentence for LGBT people (with the women of those countries also contributing to it). When and where has it been illegal (literally, not "metaphorically" nor "symbolically") to be a woman? This is literally how women (would like to) act. If … | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 02:04 AM |
| 48 | I have noticed that the phrase "not all men" is mostly used by Feminists to say "not all men... but ALWAYS a man/mostly men"At this point we should stop saying "not all men" because thorough the years they've consistently proven to not care about truth. They just want to intentionally push for their narrative to demonise and hate men. It'd better to simply say "we don't give a shit about it or what you think" because it's not like their words ever have added anything of worth. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/05/26 04:04 AM |
| 5 | Only a third of young women hold positive view of men, new poll findsThankfully nobody believed your most likely made up anecdote. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/26 03:56 AM |
| 19 | The argument about "Who set the system up" is so stupid when you actually look at the objective facts"Who set the system up?" – the meme question. If you unironically ask it as a "Gotcha 👊😼" you fell from the cradle. Easy answer. The upper class, which includes women. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/26 03:49 AM |
| 2 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:This isn't your typical mainstream sub. Here users won't upvote you for repeating the same debunked hoax while citing nothing. Btw, even if you try to hide it, arctic shift photon reddit will show your history anyway. You aren't even part of this community but a lurker. If you've got nothing to add it'd be far more preferable you didn't comment at all. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/04/26 01:23 AM |
| 5 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:You wrote a whole ass bible just to foam "you fucking fuck fucked fuck fuck 😾" and attempt to emotionally manipulate me. None of your sources prove miscarriage is explicitly illegal; the first one in note [37] just mentions two cases where the women had to prove it was a miscarriage for the charges to be dismissed/dropped. Your second source is a feminist magazine (funny how I can't cite a supposedly fashconservative woman bitchery butchery 😾 source but you can apparently cite a feminist source)… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/04/26 04:35 AM |
| 1 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:Because most of those who spread the aforementioned hoaxes are women. Their ideology is literally built upon the idea all of history was a patriarchal dystopia for women which still persists to this day. Practically none of them call out misandry, unless it's to say "this hurts us because then our problems (caused by men) won't be taken seriously". | /r/MensRights | 21/04/26 09:53 PM |
| 5 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:Well, I won't speak much about your social media circle, but it's true that a lot of men who are defendants of vulvas do so because they want to have sex with them. "Not all" of course, but it's not like the people they defend care about that anyway. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/04/26 09:07 PM |
| 23 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:Is this another one we “get” to debunk for the next few years where the lie is more spread by feminists and nobody listens to the true one? Yes. Just like they do every single time. They spread a hoax and keep repeating it after they've successfully ignored the refutations of said hoax. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/04/26 09:02 PM |
| 10 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:I know there're lots of them, I'm just listing the ones that first came to my mind. Maybe I'll add more later or make a part II, I don't know. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/04/26 07:21 PM |
| 96 | "62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list:But hey, these people are the ones who say women wouldn't ever think of lying about topics like this, that we have to "believe women" and that historically and to this day, supposedly, men have been bound by a patriarchal pact to cover up for each other's manipulations and abuse. Now I see it's all projection. Any other group pulling this amount of hoaxes so frequently would've already been considered on the same level as hollow earth believers. "Hey but are you aware men also take part on sprea… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/04/26 07:11 PM |
| 9 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:Here I linked most of the examples. Of course, I didn't have people who don't agree in mind when posting it. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 10:51 AM |
| 11 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:Here are most of them — International Rape Day: technically it was 'National Rape Day' but it was a hoax spread worldwide, so it was referred to as 'International' by some. — Men leaving sick wives — Men in Europe supposedly giving women shots at pubs and nightclubs in 2022: there wasn't any actual real case. In Spain the hoax was known as "pinchazos" and didn't have a single real case either. — The group of 70k men who wanted to coordinate efforts in order to kill/rape women in Telegram: this g… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 10:46 AM |
| 3 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:That still doesn't say much. But well, later I'll reply or maybe post a comment in this post to either all or most of the examples you ask, assuming "all of them" is literal. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 02:59 AM |
| 6 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:Some of them are recent, others happened years ago. Be more specific and I'll reply in a few hours, unless I have to send pictures (because this sub doesn't allow pictures in comments). | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 02:42 AM |
| 62 | None of the women involved in the '62 million men were complicit in an online Rape Academy' hoax have been held accountable (as they like to say). Here's more hoaxes they haven't taken responsibility for spreading that I remember:And to top all of this off? All this comes from them, who claim no woman would ever think about or be capable of lying about issues like these. Those who ask you "do you really think (a large portion of) women would lie about rape and abuse?" as if unironically pushing forward the position women are free of saying something fake. That we all should "believe women". Those who say men throughout history have been bound by a patriarchal pact to cover for each other's lies, manipulation and abuse. N… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 01:25 AM |
| 92 | The 62 million stat is the newest demonize men psyop.The worst kind of response is "but [insert small number] people is still too many, it should be zero" Essentially it means "how dare you to have critical thinking and debunk my hoax 😾😾😾" Not a single one of them has taken accountability (as they like to say) and instead have doubled down with their head-in-the-sand attitude: "just because I'm spreading misinformation doesn't mean I'm in the wrong" Which is definitive proof they never actually sought truth, they just want to slander and ruin a gr… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/04/26 07:11 PM |
| 13 | New Statesman UK survey on women's attitudes towards men and vice versaThe boundary between what's mainstream in the internet and what's mainstream in real life disappeared around 2018 or so. What surprises me is that the percentage of women U25 with a negative view of men is lower than I expected. I expected at least a 55% of negative views. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/04/26 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated Lesbianswell that sets the direction of your account, defending hoaxes 👊😎 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/04/26 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated Lesbianslesblan myths erasure 😼👊** Your account is a week old btw You create an account and that's your first comment? Really? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/03/26 06:55 PM |
| 1 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farYes, it is about the punishment French women faced after collaborating with the Nazis in WWII. The tactic is always the same. "Women are criticised/punished heavily for [insert anything they complain about] whilst men aren't" and boom, thousands, if not hundred thousands of favs. Doesn't matter how blatantly and shamelessly obvious and deliberate the ignorance, invent and/or omission is. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 03:59 AM |
| 2 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far8 March, i.e., International Women's Day, if you didn't know. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 03:07 AM |
| 3 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farAs I replied to another user here, I wish it were just ragebaits from Nepal or Malawi, and only that, but no. And I'm not joking with this. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 03:03 AM |
| 2 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farYou did well. The discourse most likely is only going to get worse and worse each month of each year that passes, being generous. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:44 AM |
| 5 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farAs I replied to another user, my improvised theory is they take the "man with a lot of sex partners = winner; woman with a lot of sex partners = slut" cliché (which is itself a strawman) and act as if the world believed religiously in that as a principle set in stone. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:41 AM |
| 5 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farIt's valid to ignore them. I'm just exposing them because I consider they merit so. If they're going to post their pedantic 🧠n't ahh takes for everyone to see, then there's really no harm in exposing them here. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:38 AM |
| 3 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farIf I had to explain it in some way, perhaps they take the "a man with a lot of [female] sexual partners is a winner, the woman with a lot of sexual partners is a slut" cliché (which is itself a strawman) and apply as if it were some kind of universal idea. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:34 AM |
| 4 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farIndeed, and it's only gotten worse in that aspect. A lot of people say you should ignore it, which is valid of course. But exposing them here doesn't really hurt anybody, as far as I know. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:31 AM |
| 11 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farMost countries on earth currently don't punish sexual assault committed by women and people to this day are still debating whether it exists or should be taken as seriously. Like they're ones to talk about other groups getting light sentences for committing SA, when the punishment theirs gets most of the time is literally zero. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:16 AM |
| 8 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farI wish it were just ragebaits from India or Tanzania, and only that, but no. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 02:01 AM |
| 22 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farIn general, popular social media has posts like those in abundance. I'm just exposing them here from time to time because I consider they merit so. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 01:54 AM |
| 37 | 8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so farA disturbing amount of them unironically think women as a group have it as hard if not harder than gender nonconforming men, and that the worst thing that can happen to a man is not having all the sex he wants. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 01:42 AM |
| 3 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartTrue true. I forgot that an ugly ass mf with Down's Syndrome face looking in their direction is more than enough to make them feel pathological nausea to the point they'd seek their self-death and throw themselves from the 19th floor. The ultimate eugenics technique 👊 😎 | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 05:31 PM |
| 7 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartYou don't have any evidence that the men involved are innocent either, yet you are quick to defend them without proof. If you want to go with that, you don't have any evidence the men they mentioned even exist. Which is exactly what you are doing right now. You're the same person who called the disabled men "vegetables" btw It's funny you're still stuck with the use of that word in your mind. It's like you are deliberately being offended on your own. It thought it was clear I said it in the cont… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:43 PM |
| 2 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartA very quick google would show you that sexual harrassment of nurses in hospitals and nursing homes is common. As is sexual assault/harrassment of vulnerable patients and those with diabilities and patient to patient abuse. It is super complex and not helped by “it didn’t happen”. Stepping all of that aside, the comment you're replying to makes it explicit I'm replying like that to the other user because they said the same thing in this sub to another poster. It wasn't aimed at you so you took o… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:21 PM |
| 11 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartIts like you are purposely ignoring their stories. I don't have any reason to take their word for it. The whole point is that regardless of disability, men ARE capable of harming others still. Thats not ableism, infact, its quite the opposite. Your response reads like a prepared speech. What I pointed out is their attempt to make it seem as if non-disabled women were treated worse while disabled men are, according to them, 'coddled' as if they as women were at the mercy of individuals who, again… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 04:13 AM |
| 9 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartYou for example. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 04:04 AM |
| 5 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartI'm confused. I think my response is obvious. The other user attempted to pedantically go "hmm acktshually" by saying "nobody said what you claim" but it only made them look like they didn't read the post. I have a lot of family member of both sexes who work in various medical roles in hospitals, and I assure you, they do get harassed. Like a lot of times. I'll use a comment you left in another post in this sub: this did not happen | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 04:01 AM |
| 9 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartCool. I'll use that as my new flair. If the shoe fits. I didn't ask you to tell me about your life either. Have you even heard yourself? You're being aggressive towards me for absolutely no reason. You don't know me, you just want to be angry about something. Maybe try some self reflection. What did I do to hurt you? Just exist? And it's just me pointing out your comments lack substance and contribute nothing to the conversation, if anything, you barely got the response you deserve. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 03:55 AM |
| 6 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartYet another substanceless comment in a poor attempt at deforming the conversation. I just mentioned it because it's more or less mainstream, but well, you and your narcissism. But ok, lesson learned. From now on I'll refer to you as who you are: a methhead with CTE. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 03:36 AM |
| 8 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartSo far everything you've said has not been substantial at all in any shape whatsoever, and somehow I'm in the wrong for pointing it out. You truly are shameless when it comes to misrepresenting stuff and distorting the topic of conversation. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 03:16 AM |
| 10 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartIf you say so I won't question you on that, but I'll point out how blatant you are at your previous attempts at distorting the conversation. So far, none of your previous comments added nor refuted anything. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 03:13 AM |
| 13 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartRight, I forgot. People typically wipe their ass without using their arms. Thanks for enlightening me. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 03:11 AM |
| 13 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartTypical. I show how they are using Hawkins to put themselves and women in general as victims of disabled people (some even invalidating ableism) and someone comes up with "so you are saying disabled people aren't capable of abuse?" Neptune temperature IQ ahh take. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:53 AM |
| 7 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartAnd if you can't move your legs you can still harass people What you mention isn't the situation the first comment (literally the first example) is alluding to, though. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:46 AM |
| 12 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartWhat's the need to post the same copy paste three times? Serious question. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:44 AM |
| 14 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartr/commentmitosis Either way, I'll repeat it here. The first example says they were supposedly harassed multiple times by men who, according to them, 'couldn't even wipe their own ass' and there are at least two more who do the same thing. It should be obvious I'm parodying what they claim to go through. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:38 AM |
| 15 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartThe first example mentions being (supposedly) harassed multiple times by men who 'can't even wipe their own ass'. Obviously, I'm parodying what they claim. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:35 AM |
| 39 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartDuring the time I've shown here what they post on other platforms, your comment has been one of the best ones I've received so far. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 02:25 AM |
| 45 | Look at how virtue signalling falls apartAlso, as an aside about Stephen Hawkins: he most likely didn't get a boner and could barely move a few fingers. What was he even supposed to do there? Throw some pick-up lines using Loquendo? Carry kids over his back like a supermarket cart? "Hi girl you are very pretty aaaaaahhhhhh aaaaaa" buffer overflow due to arousal Or something like that I guess | /r/MensRights | 16/02/26 01:53 AM |
| 10 | "I wonder about the current state of feminist discourse, it can't be that worse—"I know they aren't gonna change, the purpose of this post is just to expose what I've seen from engaging with their posts for the past few months. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/26 03:05 PM |
| 14 | "I wonder about the current state of feminist discourse, it can't be that worse—"Sorry OP, but random internet assholes do not represent "feminist discourse". We hate it when feminists make this argument about men's rights - don't do the same. Not really an equivalent comparison. When Feminists make their arguments they don't take what MRAs say, they take MGTOWs, Blackpillers/InCels, PUAs and TradCons post since in their mind they're all the same due to, for the most part, not engaging in what they intend to criticise. Not to mention they often take hoaxes and keep repeating… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/26 02:49 PM |
| 7 | "Man I wonder how feminist discourse is going now, it can't be that worse—"Social media in general is like that. In Facebook, Instagram and TikTok you get similar or worse content and comments. The purpose of this post is just to expose a portion of the popular content I've seen. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/26 11:42 PM |
| 24 | "Man I wonder how feminist discourse is going now, it can't be that worse—"As I replied to another user, reading what they all post for months feels like a DDoS attack on the brain. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/26 11:36 PM |
| 7 | "Man I wonder how feminist discourse is going now, it can't be that worse—"Even if you don't consider all of that too bad, you can't deny reading what they all say it's like a DDoS attack on your neurons. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/26 11:31 PM |
| 37 | "I wonder about the current state of feminist discourse, it can't be that worse—"If you think women are wonderful and incapable of wrongdoing then you hate them. That's like accusing a Christian fanatic of hating God. And according to himejoshi/yuri-fans, if you are a fujoshi, you are male-centered and androcentric. And according to fujoshi BL/Yaoi are something feminist. The less said about their "reflective posts" such as "society prioritises male loneliness over women's safety" the better. It's like watching those cringe protestants accusing everyone else and other protes… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/26 10:10 PM |
| 16 | "Man I wonder how feminist discourse is going now, it can't be that worse—"Like, if you think women are perfect and incapable of wrongdoing it must be because you hate them. That's like accusing a Christian fanatic of hating God. The less said about their "reflective posts" such as "society prioritising male loneliness over women's safety" the better. Of course they're using the Epstein situation and history hoaxes to slander men but what's new about it, really. And lastly but not least stupid, himejoshi (yuri fans, i.e., women) accusing fujoshi (other women) of "andro… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/26 09:52 PM |
| 5 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansTypical. I say with sources that in the past women weren't sold in a butchershop and the response I get is "ah, so you say they loved lesbians? Gotcha 😼😼😼👊👊👊" plus not a single source cited yet. Well, it seems your feelings truly don't care about facts, right? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/26 07:09 PM |
| 6 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansA woman saying someone else is desperate to feel oppressed is ironic on another level. Just look at the entire post with the sources I cited, and then compare it to your comments so far. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/26 01:45 AM |
| 11 | If you claim that a man getting offended when exerting hate speech of men (I hate men, men are trash etc) is guilty of the things you hate of them, then you're part of the problem.I doubt the ones who said the stuff you don't want to repeat are mainstream. Which is another difference with what women say about men, since those are all mainstream and get a lot of support. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/01/26 06:16 AM |
| 30 | If you claim that a man getting offended when exerting hate speech of men (I hate men, men are trash etc) is guilty of the things you hate of them, then you're part of the problem.Saying women are cheaters, gold diggers, annoying and so on isn't at all equal, let alone worse, than what they say about men (that they are all rapists, abusers and murderers of women who cover up each other's abuse). In general, men don't reply to the shit they get told, let alone replying as harshly as they should. If they replied by saying stuff like women are unloyal, slanderers and defamators by nature, or saying their suffering is worth less than turd, for example, then it'd be more equal… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/01/26 05:40 AM |
| 10 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansClassical normie response when you want to be seen as intelligent, "go read this is common knowledge" which is even worse in your case, since you haven't cited any source but instead just repeated clichés. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/01/26 02:38 AM |
| 12 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansDo you all read from a commonly agreed default script or why is it that the replies like yours all sound the same, almost word for word? You have some nerve to say that after vehemently ignoring the comment where I mentioned two lesbians who, not only weren't persecuted by the Nazis, but actively collaborated with the NS regime. I'd like to post an equally short reply but what you said doesn't even qualify as a fallacy, it's a post-fallacy. What you all say is in summary: "the men were made ille… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/01/26 12:30 AM |
| 8 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated Lesbians2 comments and you've yet to refute or bring anything else other than your substanceless delusional train of thought. is it lesbians fault that gays were persecuted more than lesbians and killed for their sexuality? Ah, so you admit lesbians weren't systematically persecuted like gay men were. You have the nerve to ask that after vehemently ignoring two examples of openly lesbians who actively collaborated with the Nazi regime that I mentioned. Other than that you just repeated what you said ear… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 07:39 PM |
| 9 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated Lesbiansyou do realize lesbians were the biggest allies of gay men during the AIDS crisis? Regardless of how much of that is true, the post doesn't talk about the behaviour of lesbians, but rather about the difference in treatment by society towards achilleans and sapphics, hence your mention of the AIDS crisis is irrelevant The only explanations as to why you might think mentioning historical events, where a double standard about the treatment of two groups is proven, legitimates hatred against the mor… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 03:52 PM |
| 37 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansWhat's wrong with exposing a prominent example of how punitivism was implemented excessively only against men? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 03:27 AM |
| 22 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansStupid question. If you don't care nor want to contribute anything then don't bother commenting. I even stated this in the post just to avoid those types of comments: Queer women are still women and thus treated more leniently than queer men. But well, I get it, next time I'll reiterate it a hundred times over just to make sure nobody misunderstands it. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 03:24 AM |
| 13 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansNormie spotted You really should stick to commenting on soccer subs, other subs such as this aren't your strength | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 03:23 AM |
| 22 | Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansHere are some examples of Lesbians tolerated by the Nazis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violette_Morris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anneliese_Kohlmann The last one was part of the army and wasn't persecuted by the Nazis. She even sexually abused a Jewish woman. And just in case, anticipating to what some might try to reply against this information by using some of the most used examples to talk about "persecution against Lesbians in Nazi Germany": Henny Schermann: she was executed for being je… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/26 10:31 PM |
| 46 | Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated LesbiansHere are some examples of Lesbians tolerated by the Nazis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violette_Morris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anneliese_Kohlmann The last one was part of the army and wasn't persecuted by the Nazis. She even sexually abused a Jewish woman. And just in case someone might try to reply against this information by using some of the most used examples to talk about "persecution against Lesbians in Nazi Germany": Henny Schermann: she was executed for being jewish Mary Pünjer: a… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/26 10:22 PM |
| 8 | Getting married triples the risk of deadly health problem - but only men are affected.Men get married, get cozy at home, kick back the beers and the TV remote control… And get fat… I've also heard that a lot. And with that, we can refute the notion that "getting a girlfriend is what gets a man to improve". | /r/MensRights | 13/03/25 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Allow women to commit one murder without punishment: NCP-SP leader Rohini Khadse urges to the President of IndiaIndian feminists complain about rape and sexual assault while they protested in favour of keeping rape and sexual assault against men legal in their country (and most accusations of rape against women are most likely false as well). For the huge population they have what happens there (their number of recorded cases of rape isn't even that much different from the US) isn't even the minimum of what one would expect, so I actually hope the crime rate there raises. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/25 04:13 AM |
| 1 | Men created the system so all problems are created by menAside from indirectly saying women contribute nothing to society beyond childbirth, the correct response is that the upper class created the system, and that upper class includes women. Those saying only men created the system fell from the cradle when they were newborns | /r/MensRights | 06/02/25 01:19 AM |
| 20 | The curious case of Jessica ValentiThere are two things that annoy me the most about this. The fact that, with their discourse being socially accepted, they turned their delusions into effective laws. The indulgence that characterises that cognitive dissonance. Yeah, we get it, the average man is worse than a Schutzstaffel soldier, you would cut off your own tongue, hands and feet before ever recognising that SA, IPV, etc. aren't problems exclusive to women, and you want all the laws in the world so that men stay away from you. O… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/12/24 12:49 AM |
| 7 | The Mazan/Gisèle Pélicot rape trial in France wrongly called the trial of all menI wasn't talking about women raping men and receiving sympathy, empathy and support due to being victims, if anything because women that rape men already receive more support and sympathy than the average man even if they weren't former victims. I'm talking about, for example, how people justify women receiving shorter sentences than their male counterparts for the same crime because women who were abused are overrepresented amongst those who commit crimes —even though with men their supposed ov… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/12/24 02:36 AM |
| 5 | The Mazan/Gisèle Pélicot rape trial in France wrongly called the trial of all menIf they were abused as children then it showcases another double standard, since when a woman/girl is a victim and then commits atrocities she's sympathised and empathised with, whilst virtually no one has bothered to even consider what you mentioned here. Those who promote the official narrative clearly don't care about that yet still expect us —even when years ago feminists were always replying "if you felt called out it must've been for a reason"— to feel responsible for it. They're just a bu… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/12/24 02:13 AM |
| 7 | Male perpetrators of sexual violence are under-reported in comparison to female perpetrators of sexual violence. Thoughts?They're basically trying to (in)validate self-report using more self-report. And on top of that using a survey developed by someone who already believed SA by women wasn't as severe as by men's (the view that has been the legal and societal norm since at least Hammurabi's Code and earliest civilisations, if not before). Peak scientific research and methodology, indeed | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/12/24 02:40 PM |
| 19 | I hate being called "One of the good ones."I would've either cut them out of my social contact or insulted the back, or both at the same time if I had been in your place Given how they use their tales of abuse against you, you can throw your own experiences of abuse at the hands of women, and tell them they're not entitled to your sympathy after what they'd said, or something along those lines. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/12/24 12:42 AM |
| 3 | The vitriol toward guys on women's subreddits is obsceneI could go on, but it'd be off-topic at this point I'm not into anthropology and tend to dislike evolutionary explanations, since the EvoPsych—at least the most well-known one, the one from Santa Barbara promoted by David Buss et al.—is pseudo-science and isn't able to prove anything. Cultural Evolution is honestly better, but I can see the parallelism. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/24 07:01 PM |
| 3 | The vitriol toward guys on women's subreddits is obsceneTo begin with, most of the propaganda and hate speech directed at other groups is targeted towards the AMAB members of a group while the AFAB members are treated more leniently. The most recent example being trans people, wherein transwomen are portrayed as "males in disguise (literal name of a transmisic Twitter account)" whose brains are rotten by porn and that they all look like ugly, dirty and fat men in their 30s or older, and that want access to women's spaces to commit sexual misconduct (… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/24 03:56 AM |
| 2 | The vitriol toward guys on women's subreddits is obsceneCan you be more specific? Do you refer to what I said about the English against the Irish or just persecutions in general? | /r/MensRights | 17/12/24 04:34 PM |
| 15 | The vitriol toward guys on women's subreddits is obsceneDon't say crap about women getting "persecuted" and "infatalised" at the same time, you (should) know those two don't merge and it's a complete lack of respect to groups that have actually been demonised and persecuted through history which, if it wasn't obvious, women weren't the main victims by any metric. Literally any atrocity committed by the English against the Irish alone is worse than whatever "persecution women suffered". | /r/MensRights | 17/12/24 04:07 PM |
| 2 | Anyone else just get exhausted around women?!At that point I'd have said something like "I won't remain one of the good ones for long if you keep talking" | /r/MensRights | 11/12/24 09:40 PM |
| 3 | Reminder that Megan Fox is a confessed misandristWorst of all is she has three children It's crazy that in order to get a driving license you need to pass an exam, yet to become a parent it seems anything will do | /r/MensRights | 10/12/24 06:21 PM |
| 9 | Worries that the election and subsequent results will continue to drive the divide and double standards of men and women even further.I read somewhere that the 4B movement now became the 6B movement, which includes not interacting with men online, or not talking to men in general. I always considered myself an atheist, but right now I'm praying hard that becomes a reality. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/11/24 05:40 PM |
| 8 | Wellness check: how're you coping with the fallout?I'm not from the US but I'll say it anyway: I've seen the seethe in social media and at the same time Right-Wingers have been endlessly mocking feminists and women in general. Feminists' reaction to Nick Fuentes baiting them has been genuine comedy gold. At least it shows plenty of users didn't take them and their reaction seriously. And I unironically think that has been a positive influence. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/11/24 02:14 AM |
| 39 | Worries that the election and subsequent results will continue to drive the divide and double standards of men and women even further.The fact they went and said we, as group, are "unworthy of interacting and having sex with them" will never not be amusing to me, as if they really think men are missing on something for not interacting with them. I hope they keep their word, I wouldn't want to see them with a boyfriend/husband at all. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/11/24 01:03 AM |
| 16 | Apprently an old friend no longer wishes to have anything to do with me because I’m a man. Honestly infuriating.That's perfect. No man will have to deal with her again, fortunately. If only more women were consistent with what they believe and applied it in real life. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 12:42 AM |
| 65 | Well feminist admit in nowLet's play the same game. According to the study in this book one can claim 62.4% (or perhaps more) of women have raped. This was done in 1998, so it could probably be higher nowadays. For instance, the MeToo campaign of 2016 was promoted mainly by Asa Argento, a sex offender. Women either ignore or don't care about that, considering how massive the campaign was. We can safely conclude, then, under that logic, that support for the MeToo movement was due to women wanting to cover up the SA they c… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/10/24 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Disagreement within my family"only men minimise male victims of SA" Your example: "sexual fantasies"; under your logic, women minimise rape against them since rape fantasies are common in the media they consume. Conservative women don't consider male victims of SA as legit either, and 'Progressive' women use "coomers" and conservative men just to discredit male victims of SA because "they themselves don't care" (even though they constantly say lesbians harm each other and don't take it seriously). The fact you think it's th… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/24 06:07 PM |
| 7 | How true is the statement that more than 25% of women are raped?Those numbers typically appear when the surveys ask for lifetime prevalence. When it's like "12-month period" or "7-month period" the numbers are typically lower. In any case, men have by far the worst under-reporting problem of the two in comparison to women (not even violent victimisation from strangers prompt men to report), so men reporting less in a survey it's not the silver bullet feminists think it is. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/24 12:17 AM |
| 5 | Disagreement within my familySure. Women: the group that has been legally protected and privileged by not being punished for their crimes (particularly S. Assault and IPV/DV) at all, their victims (boys, men) not being treated seriously or not even considered to exist, which labour has consistently been way less harsh than men's, and which virtually never has been the main target of massacres, is the group which has been as "dogs" for "300 hundred years" (while they've been gone unpunished for crimes for +3 millennia and wh… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/24 03:51 PM |
| 5 | The double speak of "it's other men" or "men do this to themselves" when it comes to male gender roles.The point is to highlight the double standard, given what they cite to propose women having disadvantages in education doesn't even come close to all the legal/societal obstacles there have been placed thorough history up until this day to prevent women from facing the same consequences (or even facing consequences at all). | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/10/24 03:34 PM |
| 5 | Why People React Less Positively to Research Favoring MenIt's ironic they want to apply that phrase to men in areas like science, technology and art like music, given the amount of asexuals and achilleans amongst the successful/influential men of those areas. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/24 03:15 AM |
| 10 | The double speak of "it's other men" or "men do this to themselves" when it comes to male gender roles.It won't work anymore, since they'll tell you "those are also men", but between 2015-2019 that argument (and its variant applying it to black men) did indeed butthurt them. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/10/24 03:08 AM |
| 10 | The double speak of "it's other men" or "men do this to themselves" when it comes to male gender roles.Easy to say when for +3 millennia women have been exempted from being judged by the crimes they commit, and in some cases not being considered crimes at all (like S. Assault) just because a woman committed it, a trend which continues up until today. Not all men, but somehow always geniuses are men. Even Marxist RadFems have to ask for recommendations of female authors, since about 80% of the material they end up reading about it comes from men. Even when they make playlists about "music to hate … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/10/24 03:07 AM |
| 18 | On a leftist subreddit. Feminists claim to care about men, while also saying we commit “a lot of physical and mental violence to women and children” and that we deserve to be treated like shit…Sure, it's very easy to say it when since Hammurabi's Code (and perhaps even earlier) rape against women (when committed by a man) has been punished in law and treated severely, while rape against men (when committed by women) up until this day isn't considered a crime in most countries (same applies to other crimes like DV). Under their logic, Blacks and the poor oppress Whites and the rich. But when you claim "+90% of inventors are men, 99% of geniuses are men" (and the like) just then they sa… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/09/24 02:26 PM |
| 16 | Most people who say this would prefer the issue of male SA victims to never come up at allIt's not like they often act nice when the victim they are using for their discourse tells them they don't like their experience being used for that purpose. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/09/24 12:45 AM |
| 60 | Most people who say this would prefer the issue of male SA victims to never come up at allNext level hypocrisy. They constantly have used and continue to use individual cases of what are considered tragedies/horrible events against women by men to say "All Men" and that they "prefer the bear over the man". | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/09/24 12:02 AM |
| 4 | “Men will fuck anything” is actually goodPeople with high standards (what the quoted phrase references) are usually scum themselves | /r/MensRights | 06/09/24 11:42 PM |
| 2 | r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentencesThat's a poor attempt at questioning a point by its words' definitions. The two definitions of the word (from 'instigate') inherently imply an active/intentional participation (other synonyms are foment, provoke, encourage or incite, in case it wasn't any clearer). Had I said "caused by women" you'd have had a point, but instigate is not polysemic. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/24 03:19 PM |
| 17 | r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentencesTheir useraname checks out. In addition they say abuse survivors are overrepresented amongst criminals. Last time I checked, the overrepresentation of a group in crime was justification to vilify and dehumanise them, not an attempt to get others' sympathy for them. Oh, wait, they aren't men, so they can be excused (while those factors will only be used to dehumanise the men with those conditions). Not much else to say other than that, since their post and the comments are pure speculation, aside… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/24 05:05 AM |
| 46 | r/AskSocialScience user tries to find justification for why women are given more lenient sentencesPrecisely an increasingly common call out from MRAs is that plenty of homicides committed by men against other men are instigated by a woman. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/08/24 04:59 AM |
| 7 | Book recommendations?The Privileged Sex by Martin van Creveld The Woman Racket by Steve Moxon (at least certain chapters) Anything written by Ernest Belfort Bax about Feminism | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/07/24 02:08 AM |
| 1 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsNonsense This is nonsense "Nonsense because I say it." This doesn't mean anything when these crimes have been drastically underenforced and ignored through humanity. That applies to those crimes when committed against men, particularly by women. You literally ignored the second paragraph I wrote. I'll repeat it again in case you "didn't notice you missed it": You can visit gore sites and forums, type "rapist" on the search bar and see plenty of lynchings in less developed countries against alleg… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/07/24 01:14 AM |
| 26 | Why I'm here:Plus, that picture deliberately chooses to present only lifetime prevalence, when the self-report for the 12-month period shows equal rate of being victimised if forced to penetrate is included. They are literally demonstrating men under-report far worse than women, yet that is never brought up by those who claim rape/sexual assault is "a common occurrence for women, unlike men". | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 10:50 PM |
| 7 | Feminist logic: Blame all men for the actions of the minorityOh, how terrible, an abled woman (clearly socially and physically advantaged) got crossed off the census by a disabled man (clearly physically and socially disadvantaged). Even worse when they start citing crime stats when literally since the earliest civilisations in Hammurabi's Code, rape/sexual assault against women committed by men have been punished, while male victims barely have had some slight recognition in the 21st Century. They are this 🤏 close to saying the poor and Blacks oppress/ar… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/24 10:43 PM |
| 1 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsVerbiage, you didn't say anything substantial and on top of that you misrepresented my examples. I literally mentioned a primary source that estimated thousands of boys and girls (Giovanni Villani) to be learning Math and grammar in Florence at the time, which you reduce to "getting a lollipop" (there were plenty who "received a lollipop" then). One doesn't contradict the other because you say so, you'd literally claim something is forbidden at the same time there are no legal consequences/punis… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 10:25 PM |
| 2 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsYou try to debunk historical examples by mentioning some rape kits that go untested, as if that were refuted anything. You can visit gore sites and forums, type "rapist" on the search bar and see plenty of lynchings in less developed countries against alleged rapists, be it by popular mob, some by women, by other men in public or in jail. There, you don't have due process or trials to prevent the excesses of the commonfolk. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 09:59 PM |
| 3 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsAnd lower class men were also restricted by that logic, since only the clergy and upper classes could afford to learn Latin and write illuminated manuscripts. The lower classes wrote but in their vernacular language without care for grammar or spelling rules. It's clear to me by now you just skipped the example I gave in the original post. Interesting "laws" that aren't applied and for which there are no punishment for breaking them. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 09:54 PM |
| 2 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsLike, you both are going to ignore I mentioned in the original post a primary source (Giovanni Villani) that estimated about 8000 to 10000 boys and girls to be learning Math and grammar in XIVth Century Florence. Great. And they certainly weren't upper class either, there was something called middle class at the time. the chance of receiving education by women were lower than male given the same class. Totally, women like Anna Komnene (she literally was described as mastering all the subjects an… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 09:47 PM |
| 4 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsThe first quote says RW use crime stats to say Blacks, the poor, etc. are a problem (more defective, more dangerous, etc.), the "when Europe in general (...)" referring to the reasons why using crime stats like that is invalid: Europe literally ruined Africa's situation (the worst mistreatments occurring in the US and other protestant countries like Great Britain and the Netherlands). There are LibFems and RadFems capable of claiming upper-class women suffered more than lower-class men, though. … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 08:07 PM |
| 3 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsI didn't say RWers explicitly said black men oppressed white women. That would be more akin to RW Racist Feminists, though RW often do promote the 'Great Replacement'/'White Genocide' narrative and that there's a 'War on Whites'. The examples I brought up of them labelling male refugees as 'rapefugees' or their vilification of non-heteronormative men aren't mentioned in your comment. Neither political side has been in favour of men. But RW values are the most incompatible of all, especially if t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 07:53 PM |
| 1 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsSure, so much so that the 8K-10K boys and girls were estimated by Giovanni Villani for XIVth century Florence (literally an example I mentioned in the original post) to be learning Math and grammar. Not to mention women like Anna Komnene who was taught in almost every subject there was at the time. There were also women like Isabella, the 'She-Wolf' of France who literally put all of England against Edward II of England after he tried to remove her from power (said man was pejoratively labelled … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 07:44 PM |
| 1 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsyou refuse to see that what these groups are doing is basic Fear-mongering. I don't refuse, but saying it's fear mongering is obvious, while the explanation of how they are similar and the contradictions it generates isn't talked about enough. you are saying that whatever these groups do that advances them, is detrimental to us. Not necessarily. A RW or even a Feminist in theory and/or practice can do something good for MRs or support them. What I'm saying is that plenty of their premises are in… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 07:20 PM |
| 3 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsThat would constitute Fear-mongering, yes. And if your grandmother used a wheelchair, she would be a bicycle. Pointing out the connection between two groups and how they're incompatible with being pro-men is making this issue a zero-sum game because... Apparently a particular conservative commentator called the thing out. Or so it seems, since the point you're trying to make isn't clear. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 06:51 AM |
| 7 | One of the most glaring Feminist contradictionsI didn't point out fear mongering itself, I pointed out how Right-wingers and Feminists use the same tactic of using crime stats to frame groups of men as dangerous and oppressive. and a female rapist of a man was considered a leader. You say it as if RWers considered male victims of sexual assault by women as legit (they don't. Another trait they share with Feminists). | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/07/24 06:28 AM |
| 5 | Why do women get triggered when they hear men invented 90% of the inventions ? I mean it's just a fact , I don't see any credit taking.Which is another series of contradictions they have. They complain about "women not being allowed to excel in the past" yet are perfectly happy with using crime stats which are often self-report (also related to their claim that women "underreport"), arrests, prosecutions, legal convictions or incarcerations. Self-report: men are the one who report the least. Even when assaulted by other men. You can imagine when they suffer anything from a woman. They then dismiss self-reports when they show me… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/24 02:26 AM |
| 4 | “To our horror”: Widely reported study suggesting divorce is more likely when wives fall ill gets axedu/sorebum405 :V | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/06/24 03:51 AM |
| 17 | Update: AITAH for wanting to leave my wife because she had a "go bag"?I said it the previous time when I published a transcription of the post. If you have that level of distrust for your spouse you have 0IQ, since you decided to marry them anyway. For them, the average man is worse than a Unit 731 member, Schutzstaffel soldier or Interahamwe leader yet they still choose to marry one. It reflects both, their inconsistency and how they view the average man: worse than a member from paramilitary genocidal organisations. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/05/24 02:36 AM |
| 5 | Man Bear In The Woods With A PigIt's funny they believe that, yet often they have dogs as pets, even though dogs do attack others, totally unprovoked. Even more hilarious is that some of those women still have a boyfriend. Believing all men to be potential danger while having a boyfriend should be the premise of a comedy sketch, but it seems they like to act unironically like parodies. Some would go as far as to say they rather prefer Komodo Dragons. Imagine unironically defending monitor lizards of any kind. I actually wish f… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/05/24 02:51 AM |
| 1 | Is the alleged "epidemic" of "hidden and spy cameras" in South Korea, another fabricated and misleading "Feminist" conspiracy theory?It seems like another defamation against men. SKorea had a government that subscribed to a RadFem cult (Megalia). I don't trust a single word that comes from an origin like that. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/24 05:10 AM |
| 27 | Thoughts on True Self Healing's "statistics on domestic violence"?It should be noted all the stats about crime underestimate women's criminality. Not only because, under the same circumstances, they get lower sentences + have it easier in being considered "acquitted" but also because they're less likely to be searched by the police (about 2.5 times). That would put into parity most of the numbers for arrested individuals (in fact, it'd put things like Fraud and Embezzlement in 'mostly female') and for the numbers of arrested ones in general. So it's 100% plaus… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/02/24 12:41 AM |
| 9 | Guys Opinion about this last statement?They can do that, but they better not complain about less and less men following the left or creating their own lefty offshoot. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/02/24 07:23 PM |
| 2 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalWere you responding to someone else? Because you responded directly to my post instead of the user you were probably trying to respond to. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 05:07 PM |
| 10 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalThat used to work with RadFems within 2015-2019, but as of now, from 2020 onwards, it doesn't work anymore. The RadFems will respond to you "They are still men". | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 05:06 PM |
| 10 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI've heard it a lot for years, since I was barely an adolescent. That cis-Het women fear cis-het men, that cis-Bi women fear cis-Het (& Bi) men, that cis-Les women fear cis men of all kinds, that trans women fear cis men, etc. (but then will demand to be included in male-only spaces like Harvard, even when the US already had colleges for women, Gay Bars and infiltrate Mount Athos) Well, then stop having a mental breakdown and having cognitive dissonance, and start staying away from Men, stop con… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 03:16 PM |
| 12 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI don't get what you are referring to. In subreddits like AskFeminists months ago a post complaining about how "we have to extend too much sympathy for men" and that became one of the most upvoted posts in that subreddit. If we talk about the opposite of go-bags, as in, soliciting paternity tests, I think there already are and users in the comments pointed that out. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 03:07 PM |
| 6 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI guess I just don't see what's consistent about that In the post I literally said: It's also counter-productive and shooting yourselves in the foot, since those groups have a history of either not caring or directly harming male victims of abuse, promoting misandry directly or with narratives that end up pushing for it, and as you can notice, they wouldn't show any concern for you and actually would try to make the situation worse. — Feminist Institutions don't necessarily represent the views o… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 03:04 PM |
| 7 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalIt stops being an Oppression Olympics when women aren't the most affected. In any case, saying women are "gold diggers" and "they like bad guys" isn't as incorrect as saying "men are potential rapist etc." — the former is way more applicable to women as a group even if it's not a correct generalisation. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 02:57 PM |
| 4 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalmarriage rate drops to 0 I'd like to see that. In a way it'd fulfil Marx's proposal to abolish the nuclear family. Ok, so all heterosexual and bisexual women practice celibacy and abstain from men Do so, it'll be better for men to not be in relationships with them. Plus, it's not like practising celibacy is harder for cis women, they have much less sex drive than cis men. And in the case of bisexual cis women, they can go to have relationships with other women. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 02:54 PM |
| 2 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalAre you seriously trying to tell me you don't know what a body is? A body is organs, bones, skin, ligaments, muscles. Being expected to look after your children isn't a violation of your bodily autonomy because, while you use your body for it, your body is not being manipulated or changed in any way, shape, or form. Verbiage, you didn't say anything. You say your body is not being manipulate in shape or form, yet that's not a parameter you justified, as in "why this is the most valid parameter i… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 06:02 AM |
| 7 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalFirst How so? Your body is... your body. The things that affect is are bodily. But then That is definitely not bodily. That is reproductive. You 'offer a standard' yet you don't define the parameters as to what count and what doesn't, so your classification is arbitrary. You just said "it's not X, it's Y elaboration't" — "Let me put it this way: (...)" Personal opinion: more context and variables should be needed on those situations. Supposedly you want to draw the comparisons to pregnancy that … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 05:18 AM |
| 6 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalPerhaps you also believe that China doesn't actually have Uyghur concentration camps or the North Korean propaganda that says Americans drink coffee made of snow. Strawman the size of Jupiter, as if those two were related/inseparable from each other. (I'm always open to the possibility of the West pushing tons of misinformation, though, since that's what journalists do.) Your insult of "you're not from the west" it's strange, to say the least. That's like telling me you need to be non-Westerner … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 02:43 AM |
| 5 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalSaying "women get pregnant and suffer direct physiological effects while men don't" fails at separating bodily autonomy from reproductive rights in the case of men, since the parameters of what counts and what doesn't as "bodily" ("the ability to dictate what happens to your body" according to you) aren't defined nor justified. Feminist + the pro-surgical abortion crowd often include the obligation of taking care of child(ren) by the women as fitting into that bodily autonomy, specifically since… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 01:52 AM |
| 10 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalHow terrible, they say women like bad guys and that they're gold diggers. Surely that's totally comparable to saying men are potential murderers, abusers of women, children and animals, "partner terrorists", that thanks to men the world has a widespread rape and abuse culture, or any defamation made against any group of men through history, like Muslim men supposedly killing women for being victims of rape or that they force women to live in a 1984-like dystopia. Totally comparable... | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/02/24 12:56 AM |
| 10 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI used it because I thought you were coming from a more mainstream position. In any case, no male advocacy group uses atrocity propaganda like Fems and female advocacy groups do. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 09:46 PM |
| 14 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalYou never justified why the possibility of pregnancy is what separates bodily autonomy from reproductive rights, so as to make them incompatible as you imply ("Men can't talk about bodily autonomy because they don't get pregnant"). Anyhow, my thesis is this: criminalizing abortion on the grounds that paper abortion isn't available isn't equality. It's abuse of female bodies. Abortion hasn't been banned due to paper abortion not being available. If that were to happen, however, it'd not be either… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 09:45 PM |
| 3 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalYou say it as if any group of the manosphere were applying atrocity propaganda and similar stuff to put women in a bad light. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 09:35 PM |
| 20 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalIn theory. But as I said, one has no obligation to concede it when it's used to spread misandry, to go against men's issues and/or when they're straight up memes/false. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 09:01 PM |
| 2 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalIt's the same thing as ".com"; just an internet top-level domain. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:29 PM |
| 50 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalAs I said, it's stupid to defend the wife. If you really have those kinds of preventative measures "just in case" then she shouldn't have gotten married. "I have fear of men yet I'm going to marry a man" — 0IQ on her part and almost everyone who responded to the OP in that post. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:20 PM |
| 33 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalNow we know that if someone bad happens to them we shouldn't show any sympathy. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:14 PM |
| 1 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalWhy do you get the impression it's all based on the UK? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:13 PM |
| 14 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI don't see it as "refreshing"; I see it as common sense and being consistent rather than incoherent. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:06 PM |
| 32 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalI wish it wasn't. But it's Reddit. At least I try to put a different perspective onto it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 08:03 PM |
| 10 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in generalIf women have legal abortion, we should have legal abortion for men. But since it's not, and everyone mocks the possibility, then I fully support Roe v Wade being overturned and having abortion illegal. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 07:48 PM |
| 46 | You don't need to show or concede any sympathy to either Feminism or 'Women's issues' in general"He's lost it" That has to be the most obvious projection I've seen this month. In comparison he looked calmed and composed as everyone was downvoting him. "Women are more likely to be kill by a spouse" Of course this is questionable for a number of reasons but I won't expand here. They should cry to someone who gives a damn about it, that commenter has 56 upvotes they can go to. At least some comments on Twitter are arguing against her and have some support. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/02/24 07:45 PM |
| 2 | Why are men's music choices judged more?Those examples don't work. The mocking the Beliebers suffered pales in comparison to the ridicule Bieber himself was subjected to. Users who try to mock Taylor Swift or their fans get ratio'd to death. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/24 06:55 PM |
| 11 | "Only 2% of SA allegations are false. Trust victims!" Bullshit.That figure is only taking into account the cases not brought to trial, which has several implications. Of the cases that were in trial, around 50% end up in acquittals (which means legally declared 'not guilty') The remaining cases aren't classified as false, but not because they were demonstrated as true. They are unproven cases, just classified in different categories such as unsolved, withdrawal, unfounded/baseless, etc. It's ironic people say semantics and linguistics don't matter when a lo… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 23/12/23 03:27 AM |
| 16 | why is the concept of "male loneliness epidemic" such a controversial topic among female/feminist groups?It's controversial because of their misandry and they don't want to acknowledge men can have problems (since they think men are the oppressor/privileged). What else did you think the reason was? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/12/23 12:31 AM |
| 1 | How do you feel about normalized 'androphobia'That they should sit down on a machete. I don't care if they personally feel like that, but they decided to translate it to international discourse that must be applied at every institution. So, as it should be, I don't have any sympathy or empathy for them. If someone defamed you individually you all would feel more or less the same. The same goes here. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/11/23 03:09 AM |
| 21 | Honest question: why are people in this group not just conservative?Because I don't have cognitive dissonance (or at least I try to get rid of that if I find it), being "pro-men" while defending a system of beliefs which benefits women at men's expense would be shooting myself in the foot. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/10/23 03:51 AM |
| 1 | Is Misogyny Systemic?Simple logic: would a misogynistic system for real give women things like International Women's Day? The real surprise is a lot of people would actually argue exactly that. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/10/23 02:30 AM |
| 1 | A political lesbians perspective on white supremacy.The only consistent thing is men being more prone to innovations. Because knowledgeable women were always praised for their knowledge. That is true of Ancient Greece, Rome, The Middle Ages, India, the Protestant world, the Islamic Civilisation, etc. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/10/23 12:57 AM |
| 1 | A political lesbians perspective on white supremacy.The point is credit for being the inventor, which he got, it was used as a justification for liberating him in a trial for a crime he committed — there was no miscredit for him being a black man born as a slave. You've got no chance to use it as a justification for your gender argument, which can also be reversed: those hypothetical women you mentioned in your example actually might have taken the credit / ideas and work from other men. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/09/23 06:45 AM |
| 6 | "Men's greatest fear in pursuing relationship with a woman is that he will be laughed at or rejected. Women's greatest fear is that she will be physically harmed-raped-killed." -Thoughts?That women should not be taken seriously if they believe that. It's not surprising, women score higher in vulnerable narcissism and in neuroticism, even when they are totally safe they will cry they feel insecure and in danger. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/09/23 09:57 PM |
| 1 | A political lesbians perspective on white supremacy.Reddit sucks with notifications apparently since your response didn't show up. But in any case: That response doesn't even qualify as a fallacy, aside from being undemonstrable ("how do you know it wasn't actually like that?"; if you want to assert that or similar stuff then simply prove it or give clues it might actually be a plausible possibility) and founded on extrapolations of historical myths (a woman could file a patent as of her property, and get credited as the creator; as of now, there… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/09/23 02:22 AM |
| 57 | A political lesbians perspective on white supremacy.Despite being 50% of the population, men are +90% of inventors. (This actually extends to other areas like Wearing Apparel, like Brassieres and Corsets, where men presumably are less than 10% of those interested on that, but are almost 50% of patents on that area.) But then everyone is going to excuse and dismiss it in 1001 ways. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/09/23 03:12 AM |
| 8 | I don't understand how some people can think men being good people or even decent people is a rare or strange phenomenon.We have more examples of women helping men like Peter Scully (the creator of Daisy's Destruction), Jeffrey Epstein, Andrew Tate et al. than of women helping geniuses or kind people/acts (Einstein doesn't count, the case against him is a hoax), for example. In any case, in those situations the best thing to do is, if they say you are a bad person from the start or defame you as a group, give them reasons to think you are indeed a bad person, so you tell them "yes, do you have a problem with that,… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/09/23 03:49 PM |
| 1 | How can we not seem like a male supremacy group?They often misrepresent you intentionally, and even if they don't it's hard to tell, and I'm not willing to win the heart of such people, so instead I prefer to point out their intentional strawmen rather than being polite. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/23 04:02 AM |
| 17 | Are Any Of These Real?Patriarchy depends on how you define it. The mainstream definition: a system that oppresses women and privileges men, then no, and never has existed. "Male domination" is the only one of those that can have a modicum of truth, given men are overrepresented at the top of cognitive fields and prestige occupations, but it's not due to injustice against women as is often implied. Rape culture exists against men. Against women or children there is not, because gore pages have a lot of videos of rapis… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/09/23 03:54 AM |
| 1 | Today, I got diagnosed with anorexia. My radical feminist sister laughed at and humiliated me for itIf she did that to you, mock her back for any problem she might have. "Moral superiority" doesn't factor here, and there's no way you will be on good terms with her, nor would that be desirable. Or at least that's what I'd do. If you allow that, you will be in a unilateral bullying-type situation. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 01:43 AM |
| 1 | The myth that marital rape was legal or socially acceptable long ago.Basically you never refuted the core of what was said by OP. condemnation =/= legal repercussion so idk what the point is of the first part of the sentence? Blatant strawman ignoring the cited cases of legal repercussions done to the men who committed those acts, simultaneously missing the point of the paragraph you quoted. The reason social condemnation is mentioned is because the common feminist narrative says there was a "rape culture" (and often say we still live in one), i.e., that rape was… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/23 08:34 PM |
| 15 | R/menslib feels like so weirdYou aren't wrong to think they are psyops, controlled opposition or stuff like that, since they make no good attempt to hide it. Sorry for the comparison, but it reminds me of when Right-Wing spaces (I used to be in a lot of them around 2017-2019) constantly said a specific user/figure of influence was a psyop, a Fed, an "infiltrated" and such. The thing is often they were more correct than not. I think more or less the same with so called "Red-Pillers" and PUAs, they shouldn't even be considere… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/09/23 11:12 PM |
| 4 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry.Nothing you have said has added anything to the conversation about men's issues, and is purely in the interest of attacking another set of beliefs Refuting some notions that are said about men is more than saying "yes but this was before" or "yes and it was righteous". But even if it were only to attack a set of beliefs (one that is known for attacking men) there'd be nothing wrong with that. Blatant strawman and you can't quote me directly saying that, either you have negative IQ and don't have… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 02:47 PM |
| 6 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry."you are denying something nobody questions" Basically I'm denying a dogma. "you're as bad as the feminist" — no, because I'm not fabricating historical defamations against women, even though I technically could. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 02:18 PM |
| 7 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry."Right-wing" – debunking clichés is not right-wing, RWers often accept those same clichés but rebrand it as "righteous" ("yes, you could beat women, cheating was seen as okay if done by a man, you could rape your wife, and it was righteous!1!1!!") The reason for citing those cases is that the common imaginary has as basis the notion that "the older, the more misogynistic and pro-men; the newer, the more pro-women" "a law from the 1970s!1!1!" elaboration't (most likely more clichés originated fro… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 07:46 AM |
| 6 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry.Imagine believing in all of that and still considering you can have the slightest "pro-men" position. Peak cognitive dissonance. The dictionary definition of "misogyny" can get fucked and no one should give a shit about it, due to defining a word through criteria prone to strawmen. "Misogyny" should be defined as hatred towards women (their etymology literally means "hate women"; don't even think about strawmanning this as a "etymological fallacy"), and in your quotation marks are included conce… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 07:35 AM |
| 3 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry.Even if they want to use the "other men" (while being responsible for obscuring rape committed by women) response, it still debunks rape is something done to women exclusively as it's often implied. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 06:24 AM |
| 4 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry.When Moxon says "no published scientific paper demonstrates misogyny exists" he's making allusion to what's written on the title of his text: "misogyny has no scientific basis, the evidence is of philogyny – and misandry" —i.e., no published paper have managed to really make a case for it. Which is telling given the attention paid to the concept and how much is parroted by almost everyone. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 06:22 AM |
| 8 | Learning about men's issues is bad for mental health. I read a couple of articles about misandry.It doesn't apply, since misogyny isn't promoted by society, and never has been unlike misandry. In history the norm is appealing to the "suffering" of women, since Rome at the very least. And individual cases don't count since they go against the norm. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/09/23 06:14 AM |
| 4 | UN report: 9 out of 10 people worldwide (including women) are biased AGAINST WOMENPeople should learn to not take the UN (or any organisation of that kind, alongside others like WHO ) seriously. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/23 11:36 PM |
| 2 | World chess bans trans women from all-female contests over 'unfair advantage' fears. OP: Are they impyling men are more intelligent or is it a strength issue?I don't have to prove anything because I actually apply the principle of presumption of innocence (innocent unless proven otherwise) which you all lack. Of course 'sexism' would be 'widely acknowledged', just because they're good at chess doesn't mean they'd be correct, like you are demonstrating with a textbook example of the Ad Populum Fallacy. In your example you mix up things. can't happen It's not the same as what I proposed: if they are so worried about their security they should stop play… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/23 05:30 AM |
| 2 | World chess bans trans women from all-female contests over 'unfair advantage' fears. OP: Are they impyling men are more intelligent or is it a strength issue?A group of people whose common denominator is interest in chess who reunite at social events aren't social groups? it includes people that already left the sport So you are saying most of them haven't left the sport. they have nothing to gain They can gain victimhood status from the commonfolk and virtue signallers. If "creeps" are so much trouble then why women still play in tournaments including men? They should be prioritising their safety and choosing always the Women's Tournaments. Do they … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/23 04:07 AM |
| 6 | World chess bans trans women from all-female contests over 'unfair advantage' fears. OP: Are they impyling men are more intelligent or is it a strength issue?Every kind of social group starts having lot of allegations or 'stories' on the part of women about being 'harassed' constantly. And those always end up being either false or exaggerations. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/23 01:55 AM |
| 8 | World chess bans trans women from all-female contests over 'unfair advantage' fears. OP: Are they impyling men are more intelligent or is it a strength issue?Women are underrepresented at the top of chess in comparison to how many women play chess. Key word: underrepresented, so this hasn't anything to do with sample size. The number of women playing is big enough to provide a statistically large sample. Plus, the same happens in school Scrabble where more girls play the game than boys. Women are 45% of qualifiers to the North American Scrabble Championships, actually - only one women has won the North American Scrabble Championship. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/23 01:45 AM |
| 5 | Feminism is NOT for menIf they always are going to misrepresent men as a gender and go against any attempt to try put light on what men suffer (which, by the way, the 'male loneliness' is not even the tip of the iceberg regarding what men have faced and/or continue to face), then it's good they write these threads, as more men get away from a self-destructive position if they adopt it. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/23 01:36 AM |
| 25 | Democrat repositioning on masculinity continuesJust what I was thinking. They're trying to backpedal on this but the damage is already done. It feels like Virtue Signalling. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/07/23 08:26 PM |
| 18 | Men's disposabllity debunked.That scenario is fallacious as well, since there wouldn't be enough genetic diversity and all would end up committing incest. Even more so in the exaggerated example of 999 women with 1 man vs. 999 men with 1 women. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/23 04:36 PM |
| 1 | Are there really jobs that pay men more than women?I'd like to point out jobs where women make more than men. Judicial Law Clerks: https://datausa.io/profile/soc/judicial-law-clerks Professional Commercial Equipment Supplies Merchant Wholesalers: https://datausa.io/profile/naics/professional-commercial-equipment-supplies-merchant-wholesalers | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 06:25 AM |
| 5 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:Men are smarter than women, you admitted it in another thread, you just said it wasn't significant on your criteria. And I didn't say physical strength is related to ruling society, I said explicitly "smarter". I repeat: you don't know to read and blatantly misrepresent. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 03:12 AM |
| 6 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:Then Men should dominate over women and rule society, since men are smarter than women. Obviously this showcases either your trisomy 21 or your intentional misrepresentation of what was said. I pointed that out because you said it didn't mention legal differences, and I pointed two the OP mentioned, not whether it was justified, idiot. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 03:07 AM |
| 11 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:It literally mentioned that in Arabia Saudi men weren't allowed in the malls without a female relative and that they banned male-on-female domestic violence but not female-on-male domestic violence. Proof you didn't read it (at least not on detail). | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 03:01 AM |
| 12 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:If you read the post the answer wouldn't be "man". With what was exposed, people would rather not live in Third world countries, period. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 02:57 AM |
| 5 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:What a pathetic loop you just have done. You didn't provide any source for any of your statements aside from presumably hearing them on pro-Western Media. "For the sake of being a woman" — source: Miami confirmed it to me If that were the case they'd be potentially falling in the same mistake, given the lack of context. Again, read the original post instead of going on loop in an argument by pigheadedness. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:47 AM |
| 7 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:Source: Myttest Tickles "Oppression is when injustice * doesn't elaborate further *" That is, you just assumed injustice without proving it. Debate-with-Dunning-Krueger. Try to hide better you didn't read the original post. "Children are under authority because X reason, hence, this strawman must exist because of that same reason too" — This is not even a Fallacy, is a Post-Fallacy. As I said, if you are going to argue for that, you have no reason to disagree with women like Valerie Solanas or A… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:38 AM |
| 1 | Ukrainian hereYou don't say? https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/210/119/9b3.png Debate-Intelligence? More like Debate-with-Dunning-Krueger | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:34 AM |
| 9 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:You don't know to read, ignore key parts and blatantly misrepresent. Covering up your whole body is not the norm ("oppression is when clothes"), i.e., it's not an obligation. Your definition of oppression is arbitrary since it doesn't have defined standards. Saying "male authority" is not enough, since there's no inherent injustice or one-sided harm. (And aside from being another strawman, I guess you'd consider women as 'oppressors' to their sons, given they are under their authority. Or does i… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:27 AM |
| 10 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:From pro-Western Sources** you forgot to add, isn't it? Gender roles don't qualify as oppression in the same way different workplace roles don't qualify either. There's no injustice or one-sided harm. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:17 AM |
| 11 | Male privilege is a myth in Muslim countries, too, and here's why:If you come from being told that by Western Media then abstain yourself from commenting, you are the equivalent of those who pretend to be informed about the Soviet Union after reading pro-American sources. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/23 01:07 AM |
| 2 | There is far more misandry than misogyny in the west.Maria Theresa (Mother of Marie Antoinette) had 16 children in total, and she managed the Austrian Succession War while being constantly pregnant. Zenobia (Palmyra) had her first child in 266 and she ruled Palmyra after her husband's death from 267 to 272. The same goes for Education, with women like Anna Komnene, Christine de Pizan, Matilde of Tuscany, Beatrice de Galindo, Aedisia, Axiothea of Philus, Ghosha, Gargi Vachaknavi, Maitreyi, Hildegard of Bingen, for every King there was a Queen, and … | /r/MensRights | 22/06/23 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Mother always talking about how she hates menRecently I have found a lot of posts either from men being screwed up by their mothers or from women doing shit to their sons. I just hope, at the very least, this generation of young men shows (from some) distrust or resentment towards their mothers and other family members. That'd be the minimum they deserve. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/23 08:05 PM |
| 20 | Ukrainian hereThat particular case is infuriating for me, specially with the participation of the suffragettes on that. They were basically +30 years old women telling >15 years old boys they were cowards for not going to fight in WW1. And now I see tons of Ukrainian women getting to live a better life whilst men my age or less get to die in a modern day war. And the most remarkable thing feminists have done regarding this topic is to say: "the patriarchy". That itself confirms you can't be a MRA and a femini… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/23 07:58 PM |
| 7 | Question for the peeps in this sub: Do you want the bonding nature of men to change for the better or should we respect the way most men socialize, but encourage more “bromance” culture?What I would like is for society to stop being judgemental about what men do, stop trying to include women on everything and to stop encouraging men from seeking romantic relationships (since they clearly don't work out for them). I guess that's the only way I'd like the bonding nature of men to 'change'. As such, 'bromance' is just a way of romanticising (in the literal sense) a "bro-like" relationship. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 24/05/23 11:21 PM |
| 1 | "Looks don't matter" is the most BS lie women tell men.The thing with "Looks don't matter" is simple. If they say looks don't matter they are saying women don't get sexually aroused, since Looks affect sexual attraction and arousal. If they deny it, therefore they deny women have sexual impulses. The same goes for "It's mostly due to personality". If personality was the main factor then the common femenine denominator would fall in love with their friends (meaning that the friendzone would not exist) or their family members (incestuous romance would… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 02:55 AM |
| 3 | Feminists conflate MRAs on this sub, with misogynists, pedophiles, and incels.Propaganda of atrocities. Those are labels attached to a group (strawman + ad hominem, that is) in order to make them look bad in the eyes of people. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/23 05:30 PM |
| 1 | Gender biases in our narratives about historyAnd that refutes me in... ("Negative" outliers are particularly easy to exaggerate, so it wouldn't surprise me if that was another strawman) | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/05/23 03:34 PM |
| 3 | Gender biases in our narratives about historyWhich is refuted by pregnant women exercising or having sex with their partner during pregnancy (not saying you should do hard labor during pregnancy, but certainly is not something that leaves you paralytic as everyone seem to imply) There were also wet nurses, family members helping them and people working on the house to ease that part. And having +10 kids on average is a strawman extrapolating very primitive times with more modern ones. Not even the country with the highest fertility rate (N… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/04/23 05:12 PM |
| 5 | Gender biases in our narratives about historyThe issue of motherhood preventing them from doing anything is meme. If motherhood really prevented women from anything, part and full-time employed mothers would not exist. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/04/23 03:56 AM |
| 2 | The AI blocked me for the debating female privilegeMuslim countries? Those that have vehicles only for women like in Mexico and Japan? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/23 01:38 AM |
| 1 | Another Feminist Belief DebunkedColttaine debunked that back then in 2018 In short: Franklin didn't discover DNA or RNA (that was done in the 19th century) nor did she produced the first photo of DNA (start of the 20th century), she didn't take photo 51 (Raymond Gosling; a man) and the role she played was minor compared to what Watson and Crick did, at least not so that it could be said she "did the entire thing for them". | /r/MensRights | 27/04/23 02:26 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter