TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Aware-Resolve6740 Archive

View 0 posts and 230 comments by Aware-Resolve6740 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Value is subjective, but there are certainly traits that are commonly preferred by a lot of people when looking for partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:24 AM
27

People typically practice monogamous/ serial monogamous assortative mating across various traits. It’s just not as interesting as other theories and beliefs so it’s doesn’t generate as much traction online. Hypergamy and harem fantasy is better rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:19 AM
6

Your comment appealed to emotion without regards for the facts. You provide one anecdote about a wedding that was over a million dollars in expenses which isn’t representative of the average wedding at all. I thought this sub hated anecdotes You go on to complain about alimony when it’s only awarded in roughly 10% of divorce settlements. https://wjlgs.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1276/2014/07/McMullen-article.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:01 AM
8

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:42 AM
2

How can it be betabuxxing if they find the guy attractive? in that case every guy who pays for a date or provides for his wife is a betabuxx? this term has lost its meaning if that’s the case
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:53 PM
3

I was speaking about the men who strive to be what you describe in your first paragraph. Those men certainly have an advantage in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:54 AM
2

You seem to be taking one type of situation that does happen and painting every man who finds a partner abroad with the same brush. Seems intellectually lazy and dishonest
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:34 AM
2

It certainly does happen, but I don’t think you can deny that many asian women seem to have a distinct preference white men regardless of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:27 AM
-3

I think many southeast asian women are genuinely attracted to white men. They would likely be above average height in those nations as well. How is that betabuxx?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:19 AM
3

Agreed. Especially If you’re a white guy in those countries you have a desired phenotype, coupled with more buying power.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:39 AM
7

As a man i respectfully disagree and have never viewed women this way
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:48 AM
3

Not personally attacking you at all man. I’m happy for you. I just find it dehumanizing to label a group as “discount” based on projecting your own views onto them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:46 AM
–

Probably wise
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:39 AM
3

I see. Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:39 AM
6

Nothing wrong with going where your product has more demand
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:35 AM
3

I always viewed western men geomaxxing less about going somewhere the women are different, and more about going somewhere the men you’re competing with are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:31 AM
4

You guys are your own worst enemy. You could attract a great girl who genuinely cares about you, but you’d fuck it up thinking she’s from the “discount market”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:25 AM
–

Ok bro if you get off on bringing down women for being confident in themselves despite not being models go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:14 AM
–

To you. Subjectivity exists. It’s not black and white, learn to see the shades of grey
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:10 AM
–

Ppd men are absolutely not a representative sample of the average man. As long as you find your girl attractive who gives a fuck what others think
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:00 AM
–

Most men don’t want financially dependent arm candy, they want a partner. You should marry a gold digger, you two deserve each other
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:46 AM
–

Each individual decides what success looks like for themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:18 PM
1

Probably autistic who can’t see nuances and instead think in all or nothing terms
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:34 PM
3

You are dense. Of course the contract itself isn’t the cause, but the act of getting married is often a marker of social class. This lends itself to certain behaviours that contribute to successful relationships and healthier upbringings for children brought up in such households.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:08 PM
4

I mean it doesn’t take a genius to see that there’s probably some causality at play. Childhood family dynamics impacting outcomes later in life doesn’t seem like a stretch to me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 05:12 AM
6

There is mountains of academic literature supporting this view with decades of data and you’re gonna hand wave it away by saying it doesn’t prove causality at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:46 PM
4

My counter is observable reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:41 PM
9

Successful marriages often times are made up of people with tertiary education, better future time orientation, etc. Smarter people make smarter choices. It’s no surprise children from these households fair better later in life. Broke people shouldn’t make babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:40 PM
4

He’s absolutely correct. You’re a fool if you think single mother households have no worse impact on a child than successfully married ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:32 PM
14

There’s nothing “wrong” with it in some cosmic sense, but the fact is children residing in two-biological-parent married families tend to enjoy better outcomes than do their counterparts raised in other family forms. source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3091824/#:~:text=Children%20residing%20in%20two%2Dbiological,several%20domains%20of%20well%2Dbeing. People can do what they want, but it’s interesting when a certain demographic complains about wealth inequality, crime rates, etc, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:24 PM
1

There are tons of 6ft+ guys who struggle and plenty of guys below 6ft that are successful. It’s not either or, it’s a balance. It’s a holistic measure. Guys who are 5’10 with good faces aren’t going to lose out cause of 2 inches. A good chunk of the so called top 20% will be under 6ft.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 04:03 AM
2

As long as you’re average height (5’9+) face reigns supreme for men. Face > All
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:55 AM
0

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm There are also studies that say the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 02:33 AM
5

All solid points. Thanks for taking the time to write that
/r/BlackPillScience22/01/25 01:21 AM
5

What if the man has the opportunity to marry? I see a lot of redpillers and mstows saying marriage is a bad deal for men
/r/BlackPillScience21/01/25 10:57 PM
1

So from the black pill perspective is a male pursuing marriage wise or not?
/r/BlackPillScience21/01/25 10:30 PM
9

After reading that it’s no surprise you’re in this predicament
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:14 AM
1

Water
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:52 PM
2

Nothing to do with what I said. Vetting partners is important and you are free to have whatever standards you want. The point of discussion was bringing up abortion rights and somehow relating them to women carrying fetuses influenced by past partners DNA (telegony) which is bad science. Caring about your potential wife’s sexual past if any is smart. Using the fear of telegony as one of those reasons is stupid because it’s not a biological reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:44 AM
5

Of course it does. The fetus contains DNA from the man who fathered the child, not any past partner of the women bearing the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:39 AM
5

Making any correlation between women’s desire for bodily autonomy and reproductive health with the false theory of Telegony is absurd
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:05 AM
5

r/badscience There is no reputable research showing this
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:03 AM
8

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:43 AM
8

Caring about your potential partners past sexual behaviours certainly could have evolutionary reasons like paternity certainty for males. However, your point about women retaining DNA from past partners for an extended period of time has never been proven regarding humans. Telegony is largely discredited
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:41 AM
13

Everyone has flaws so in a sense everyone settles to some extent. Don’t make perfect the enemy of good is what i’d say
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:04 PM
–

It’s called future faking. Just pretend you care to see where the relationship goes, but just view it as practice
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:08 AM
1

One thing I think a lot don’t grasp is that alpha doesn’t = good and beta doesn’t = bad. They are sets of traits both with pros and cons. The imbalance of one set over the others is where men can run into trouble. Like many things, those who can balance both sets of traits effectively probably have the most favourable outcomes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 05:15 PM
–

Can’t relate
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:14 AM
–

oh sorry I supposed to say woe is me, it’s over, women bad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:17 AM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/4gInMwgxv9 i posted my face one time and you gave me a rating lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:10 AM
1

Social class is a function of values not cash wealth. All UMC and higher will be college educated and will Marry. So yes valuing a college education is correlated with upper middle values
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:54 AM
–

Love tinder. Always worked for me
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:13 AM
–

Yeah like all the tall dudes on ppd who couldn’t get laid to save their life
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:13 AM
-1

education is a proxy for social class which correlates with certain values
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:30 PM
0

Exactly the opposite. College educated couples have the lowest divorce rate. This is backed by peer reviewed research. Sources: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3340888/#:~:text=College%20graduates%20are%20on%20average,Raley%20%26%20Bumpass%2C%202003). https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/12/04/education-and-marriage/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:19 PM
1

If you honestly think most UMC, educated men don’t care about their potential wife’s education, family, etc you are delusional. A wife is someone you bring home to meet your family.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:47 PM
0

I don’t care how much money you have, you clearly have prole values if you don’t care at all about a potential partners education, which is a decent proxy for IQ and class values.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:36 PM
5

Yes it does. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3340888/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/12/04/education-and-marriage/#:~:text=While%20more%2Deducated%20women%20have,high%20school%20diploma%20or%20less. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/families/marital.html
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:32 PM
2

Agreed. And no, I am not a doctor
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:26 PM
12

Of course physical attraction is important, but people absolutely do generally pair off based on similarities in class, education, income, etc. Birds of a feather flock together
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:16 PM
10

People tend to assortative mate based on similarities in socioeconomic class, education, etc. As someone who’s going to earn their masters degree in the spring that is not what I have seen. Almost all my friends have partners who are also in professional programs
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:03 PM
10

If you think UMC guys are going to marry those girls you are hilariously clueless. Maybe for fun, but that’s it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:55 PM
9

I anticipated a comment like this. My point regarding my parents wasn’t to say I’m sensitive to their opinions or that it’s a dealbreaker if they don’t like my gf’s career, but if I’m going to potentially marry someone, yes their eduction/career matters to me. It’s not greed, but similar values that are important to me and my family. If a women doesn’t have a college degree we probably don’t share similar values. My girlfriend is in grad school as well as me so it’s a great match in my view. UMC…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:52 PM
24

It matters to me. My parents are physicians and if I brought home the cute bartender as my girlfriend I’d never hear the end of it. Sure, I don’t find a women’s job/career sexually attractive in itself, but education is important to me because it’s a marker of IQ, status and future time orientation. There is mountains of empirical data which demonstrates that higher education correlates with successful marriages (see below) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3340888/ https://www.pewresearc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 05:45 PM
7

Sorry, not autistic enough
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:14 PM
1

I think we somewhat agree. All i’m saying is performance in the SMP is your SMV. A stocks value for example is a based on performance. A basketball players value is not based on their physical metrics alone, but how it translates in game. A dude could have everything on paper, but if he’s incel he currently has low SMV. Having certain traits certainly makes it more likely to be high SMV, but those traits alone don’t determine your value, the market does.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 09:51 PM
0

Their performance in the SMP is what dictates their SMV not their tangible measurements
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:07 PM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:26 AM
6

And us guys are any different? Everyone loves others for what they do for them. If my girlfriend stopped having sex with me or starting disrespecting me i’d certainly fall out of love with her. Love is conditional and it’s better that way. No such thing as a free lunch
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 12:09 AM
4

So your argument is that because fairytale love doesn’t exist that means love itself is a farce? transactions taking place and love aren’t mutually exclusive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 12:05 AM
1

Love is conditional and all human relationships are transactional. With that being said, chemical reactions in the brain are more real than god ever will be
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 11:51 PM
3

I would say that class is a function of values and not cash wealth. For example, a redpillers could be a millionaire, but they have prole values
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 06:31 PM
1

Big girls give the best head
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:58 PM
10

How’s your face?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:57 PM
8

The average person in the US is over weight so I agree to a certain extent. I honestly think not being short is more important than being tall if that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:47 PM
1

This whole idea that you can determine someone’s SMV through their stats is ass backwards. What matters is real life performance not what ppd decides. If a guy is 5’7 and many women want him that’s a good sign he’s high in mate value. Similarly a guy could be 6’5, educated, whatever, if people don’t want to date him he’s probably low in mate value. What matters is what happens IRL, people that make up top % of desirables may often times have similar traits, but it’s their performance on the dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:29 PM
15

lol this sub is full of dudes who are 6ft and college educated and can’t pull a door handle. It’s not this silver bullet many pretend. Face> height in many cases. Also, Intangibles matter
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:23 PM
3

That is true. If you want children one day, however, like I said marriage or the intact family is the best way to do that effectively
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 10:35 PM
5

This is all fine and dandy until it comes to something important to many people: having children. The nuclear family is the building block of western civilization. If you want to build wealth and raise healthy, well adjusted children I don’t see any way around commitment. Vet potential partners well, but don’t eschew long term relationships. That’s my advice
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 10:19 PM
–

Being a “10” isn’t the marker of being attractive. The dude is clearly above average in the most important feature which is the face. Therefore considered attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:03 AM
–

Attractiveness is relative. Just because there are male models who are better looking than him doesn’t mean he’s not attractive. Compared to the average american male (overweight) he’s well above average
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:58 AM
–

Yeah lol have the personality of a turbo autist and let me know how that works out for you. Personality matters, looks just matter more
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 02:56 AM
–

People are more attracted to those who look like them. It’s not narcissism, it’s biology https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051382300051X?via%3Dihub
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 12:35 AM
–

Go where you have a competitive advantage relative to your competition. for example: 5’9 white guy in southeast asia will be taller than most men in those nations and especially if he has blue eyes he will be in high demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 12:32 AM
–

When I go out to bars for example the girls into me make it blatantly obvious. IOI’s from far away and usually move into my general vicinity and start convos. They touch you, make strong eye contact. It’s impossible to miss
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 06:15 AM
3

Face trumps all 3. Given the man is average height.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 03:06 AM
1

As long as you are around average height, face is king.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:56 AM
2

They would have voted for a jar of pickles if that’s who was running against Trump
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:21 AM
2

This whole gender war nonsense only exists online. Most well adjusted people don’t despise the opposite gender
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 11:45 PM
5

Your comments and responses are often hyperbolic to the point of retardation. Your assessment of reality is incorrect and clouded by echo chambers such as this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:32 PM
10

You believe in a fantasy. Most people have low body counts and pair up based on similarities (assortative mating). These are the facts. Stop believing rage bait manufactured to garner clicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:20 PM
10

Or just marry a women in your socioeconomic class. Anyways, alimony is only awarded in 10% of divorces so it’s a bit of a paper tiger https://wjlgs.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1276/2014/07/McMullen-article.pdf As for child support, I’m all for it. You make children you should be the ones paying for them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 06:30 AM
2

If by short you mean like 5’5, sure. IRL a 5’10 good looking, fit guy > taller fat guy in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:42 AM
4

No nuance allowed on ppd. Only all-or-nothing thinking please. thank u
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:31 AM
1

Lol says who? By this logic a literal model with no fighting skills is not above average. Also, a fit 5’10 guy is easily above average. The average person is overweight
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:11 AM
–

Just get a bigger girl and whip her into shape. Call it an investment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 11:29 PM
–

<image> Nothin like a good Sunday skate
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 11:19 PM
–

That’s true
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:54 PM
–

Yup. When a girl is into you they’ll let you know
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:39 PM
–

Understandable. When i was single I would usually hookup with whoever approached me (if i found them attractive enough) cause then I knew she was into me. Never was interested in jumping through hoops. Choose the one who likes you, not the one you like
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:32 PM
–

Can’t relate. If a girl approaches me at the club/bar it’s usually a girl around my age
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:20 PM
15

Everyone seems to know these autistic slayers on reddit. The fact is autism is a huge disadvantage in the dating world. According to this survey, 44.6% of adult males with autism reported being virgins https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5789215/. That figure may be high over the entire population, but it is undeniable that neurodivergence like autism and asperger’s are generally seen as an undesirable features in a partner. If your story is true, those guys are extreme outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 06:04 AM
3

Despite what many pillers think, attractiveness is a holistic qualitative assessment made by individuals with many variables, not some qualitative on-paper formula. Personality is part of that assessment and compatibility matters. Why would I date someone with autism or asperger’s when I can date a neurotypical girl?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 05:06 AM
2

If it’s the best you can get it’s not settling, It’s reality
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 10:13 PM
2

This was a funny read
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:45 AM
1

Yes its an RMV trait
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:03 AM
–

Do you think a good looking guy should do such and sleep around, having multiple baby’s mommas or establish a family via marriage with one educated, attractive women?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:36 AM
–

Anyone have opinions on Bitcoin? I find myself watching a lot of Michael Saylor videos and i’m intrigued by the whole thing. Right now I’m just Index fund and forget it kinda thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:32 AM
–

I appreciate that, definitely would agree
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:27 AM
–

Yeah you’re probably right, i appreciate the feedback. I’ve got a bit of a drug habit which certainly makes me look unhealthy at times. Gotta kick it and build better habits no doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:15 AM
–

Ok i’ll delete it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:09 AM
–

Man’s got his priorities straight
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:07 AM
–

That was my first time going out to drink with friends in America so I was excited. No diddy lol I like that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 02:03 AM
–

That is all
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:41 AM
–

Yeah bad angle my bad. I’m gonna put up a better angle one sec
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:37 AM
–

I see. thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:36 AM
–

Yeah shit angle I’ll repost another.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:35 AM
–

Hoemath?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:23 AM
–

I continue to hate the way you write sentences
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:18 AM
–

Posted a selfie on my profile. What would you rate me? For context I’m fit, 178 cm so fairly average height and currently in uni.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 01:14 AM
1

Ok well based on my experience i’ve had girls genuinely attracted to me based on behaviour (my current gf) and girls some weren’t. Most people are in the middle of the bell curve where some people will dig then and some don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:51 AM
1

So all the men you see in life with gf’s are attractive to all women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:36 AM
1

Being people aren’t a hive mind and preferences differ. This is strange if you actually believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:25 AM
1

Obvious trolling lol c’mon man you can do better than this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:19 AM
–

Man i guess me and all my friends who have gf’s and past hookups are top 10%! lovely
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:11 AM
–

Elon’s playing to his strengths. Smart in my opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 01:34 AM
–

I’ve seen you comment before that men compete for access to women. Well, Elon Musk has 12 children so i’d say he competed pretty well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 01:14 AM
2

Ok. Jamie Dimon - Married. Larry Fink - Married. Bill Ackman - Married. George Soros - Married. Trump - Married. Literally almost every high status man - Married. If marriage is such a bad deal why do these intelligence, successful men continue to marry?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:34 AM
0

Lol objectively false. Women disagree all the time on what types of men they find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:25 AM
9

Shhh don’t let facts and observable reality get in the way! Sweeping generalizations and hyperbole are more fun!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:19 AM
2

You are rationalizing cowardice and risk aversion. The fact is most first marriages of college educated couples DO NOT end in divorce. Also, how exactly do you think the wealthy protect their wealth? They marry each other and consolidate it. Have fun with your surrogate and being a single father lol very high status. Single parenthood is a mark of low class. Look up wealthy individuals and what do you notice? they all MARRY. Emulate the Upper Class aka marrying. 2 Parent households will always b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:08 AM
2

You guys can hamster all day and rationalize your cowardice all you want. The fact is marriage will continue to be the way to give your children the best start at life and consolidate wealth. The Upperclass with continue to marry because they are smart. Bonding with a maternal figure is extremely important and you guys are gonna rob your children of that because you’re afraid of child support? ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 11:28 PM
1

“Sorry you don’t have a mother, but I just didn’t wanna risk paying child support” lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:19 PM
2

Pathetic that you will rob your child of the plethora of benefit that having a 2 parent household presents due to your fear of paying child support
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 08:29 PM
2

Let me ask you, if you want children (as many do) how do you plan on having such children without marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 08:16 PM
3

Lolol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 08:11 PM
0

Your logic is unsound. Tom Brady’s personal life has no bearing on anyone else’s chances in forming successful relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 09:41 AM
4

No worries. Post-Secondary Education
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 08:28 AM
2

MGTOWs were sent their own way
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 07:56 AM
10

The fact is alimony is only awarded in 10% of divorce settlements. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/wealth/how-bread-winning-women-are-driving-alimony-reform-idUSKCN0T61O8/ I know TRP likes to push the 50% of marriages end in divorce which is only true if those who didn’t finish high school https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/pdf/marriage-and-divorce-patterns-by-gender-race-and-educational-attainment.pdf The divorce rate for the tertiary educated is around 25% https://www.census.gov…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 07:55 AM
5

One cherry picked example of a celebrities relationship means nothing. I bet many on this sub can think of numerous examples of successful, happy couples comprised of average, everyday people. Normal people will continue to mature and pair off normally while you guys will continue to complain about a paper tiger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 07:26 AM
–

My advice is to reject the fantasy of a “perfect partner” because no such thing exists and insist on the real which involves compromise, accepting that whatever girl you go after is flawed just like you. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:21 PM
–

Just tell yourself he’s an average man and she settled for him like you always seem to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 10:27 PM
13

Idk Korean culture is way different than western culture. I’m in the west, and met my gf on tinder. started as hookups and evolved into a relationship. I think that’s a way a lot of my friend’s relationships started as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:59 PM
8

I hear prissy pickiness is very alpha
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 07:22 PM
–

It’s incredible the cognitive distortions you can believe. Classic case of splitting defence. Either your an alpha and unconditionally loved (All good object) or beta and settled for completely(all bad object). The world is more nuanced than you believe. Have fun with your obsession with “settling”.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 07:42 PM
36

These kind of threads demonstrate how weird this subreddit is. Talk about AI girlfriends could change everything to a well adjusted non redditor and they’ll think you’re a weird autist, but on ppd it’s just another day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:35 AM
5

Water
/r/BlackPillScience14/10/24 11:50 PM
6

Both genders compete for mates. In this case, It’s a form of female intrasexual competition to denigrate another women’s reputation by alluding to her being a “slut” which signals she’s potentially a bad investment for potential mates to make
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 09:58 PM
1

Yup. A man having a wife or ex wife and children is a form of pre-selection in a sense. It shows he was able to pass the filters of at least one women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:21 AM
–

You guys act like a “good personality” is a moral judgement. You can be a criminal with a good personality aka fun, attractive, dominant personality. The proof that personality matters is that men with autism do terribly with women generally speaking. If they had a neurotypical personality they would much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 09:35 PM
19

That should be the slogan for all organized religion
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 08:54 PM
15

God doesn’t exist
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 08:41 PM
-1

You believe in a fiction. Alimony is awarded in only 10% of divorces - https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/wealth/how-bread-winning-women-are-driving-alimony-reform-idUSKCN0T61O8/#:~:text=Unlike%20child%20support%2C%20which%20is,of%20law%20at%20Marquette%20University.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 08:44 PM
9

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 06:49 AM
1

And this is exactly why guys should have no qualms about leveraging resources, status, etc to gain access to women. We are nothing more than mammals, no shame in using your competitive advantage. Adapt or die
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:57 AM
21

Ultimately, it is the desire, not the desired, that we love. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:02 AM
0

A lot of people here want something for nothing. No such thing as a free lunch
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 08:52 PM
1

The ironic thing about “betabuxx” imo is guys who lean more “alpha” personality wise are more likely to leverage their assets and status to access women because they dgaf. Do you think guys like Epstein or Trump gave a fuck as to whether the women they’re fucking love them for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:36 PM
2

Chad ≠ Alpha. Charles Manson was undoubtedly an alpha and was 5’2
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:20 PM
9

Numerous academic studies show that genetic cuckoldry in human populations is extremely rare ~1%. https://www.cell.com/pb-assets/journals/trends/ecology-evolution/tree2086.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813347/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299839892_Cuckolded_Fathers_Rare_in_Human_Populations
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 10:28 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:08 AM
1

Lol as if
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:40 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/nqtsgQHYjO people on ppd seem to think so
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:23 PM
1

So if i’m attractive to one women, i’m attractive to 80% of women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:03 PM
0

Cause that one study judging a group of men’s faces said so huh
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:49 PM
0

Pretending that all women find the exact same subset of men attractive or unattractive is complete bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:15 PM
4

You act like you need to be some super motivated, high achiever to get women. There are dudes in the projects pulling women with ease
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 04:56 AM
10

Everyone on this forum is alive because their lineage of male ancestors successfully reproduced. The idea that women are only picking the best of the best or top 20% because of one ok cupid study of them judging mens still faces you all cling to is utter nonsense. Debating this however is useless because even though it’s observable in everyday life that average and below average looking men are in relationships and having children you’ll move the goalposts and go “they settled” or “it’s not genu…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 04:32 AM
3

Avoid those women and focus on those who aren’t like that. Tons of quality women out there
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 04:30 AM
–

Paint the jail white
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 10:10 PM
–

Interesting…I’m gonna give it a look
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 01:10 AM
–

respects for making your pfp ur face lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 01:02 AM
–

Fair enough brother
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 01:00 AM
–

Had to do it bro. Now show me ur beautiful face
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 12:54 AM
–

<image> Now you. You won’t
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 12:53 AM
–

Ur all high inhib cowards. I’ll do it anytime
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 12:39 AM
–

2 days til i fly to the land of the free home of the brave and mog all of you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:46 PM
0

But i thought personality doesn’t matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 09:10 PM
10

Plenty of guys less physically attractive than elliot find partners just fine. His biggest issue was being Neurodivergent
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:56 PM
-1

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm Rating Attractiveness: Consensus Among Men, Not Women, Study Finds
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:38 PM
1

I honestly believe neuroticism and high inhibition is underrated in these circles when discussing lack of dating success. There are guys on welfare, not exceptionally good looking in the slightest who never have trouble finding partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:19 PM
6

Maybe so. I just know that many times a girl will show her friends a picture of the man she finds attractive and they completely disagree or are outright baffled.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:16 PM
2

On the extreme ends of the bell curve of physical attractiveness yes, but in the middle where most people lie personal taste comes into play when it comes to judging others
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:08 PM
1

On the extreme ends of the bell curve of physical attractiveness yes, but in the middle where most people lie personal taste comes into play when it comes to judging others attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:08 PM
5

Yes you have to pass an individual women’s looks threshold, but my point is an increase in status give a man a wider pool of potential mates and will only increase his perceived attractiveness if he passes that threshold
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:49 PM
5

Yeah in a world where you’re either dog shit or hot your argument is strong
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:28 PM
8

Nothing to do with what i said. increase in perceived status makes any man more sexually desirable than had he not attained such social capital. Whether or not he loses out to a more physically attractive man isn’t the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:20 PM
8

This is false. Take the same man and put him in the middle of the attention structure ie. high status position and women genuinely do find him more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:00 PM
11

Women’s attraction triggers are more context dependant than men’s. The attention structure is a key determinant of status. Take the same man and put him in the middle of the attention structure e.g. leader of team, seminar, party, etc. he will be perceived as more attractive generally speaking than had he been just another guy in the group. So i would guess status. Status leads to more mating success, and more mating success leads to higher status.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 08:45 PM
0

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-women-divorce-alimony/how-bread-winning-women-are-driving-alimony-reform-idUSKCN0T61O920151117/. Only 10% of divorces in the US involve alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:28 PM
3

Yeah some academics disagree and propose the mate switching hypothesis due to the prevalence of women becoming romantically in love with their affair partner which wouldn’t make much sense if you just wanted “good genes” and nothing more. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Mate-Switching-Hypothesis-FINAL-PUBLISHED-2017.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 12:22 AM
-1

A minority of women—notably those low in mate value who are able to escape male mate guarding and the manifold costs of an exposed infidelity—will pursue a mixed mating strategy, obtaining investment from one man and good genes from an extra-pair copulation partner (as the trade-off model predicts). Since the vast majority of women secure genes and direct benefits from the same man, however, most women will attempt to secure the best combination of all desired qualities from the same man. https:…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 12:08 AM
-1

I hate admitting when i’m wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 12:02 AM
-1

😘
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 11:58 PM
2

Materialistic nightmare
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 10:58 PM
5

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere-exposure_effect or it could lead to you liking that someone even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:21 PM
2

These are the kind of comments that are so extreme and bizarre that it falls under Poe’s law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:16 AM
5

Because he’s chronically online and has no idea what he’s talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:11 AM
0

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/rXBXdsxlMA I literally did that lol. Probably was a bad idea given this is PPD but i was being an attention whore. I deleted my pic cause it probably wasn’t my brightest idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:25 PM
5

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm Rating Attractiveness: Consensus Among Men, Not Women, Study Finds
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:57 PM
1

I agree. Assortative mating is the reality of human sexual dynamics. Birds of a feather flock together.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:42 PM
2

Definitely. Looks get ur foot in the door. The majority of people find sexual partners so i do believe most pass the looks threshold for someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:16 PM
1

Easier to blame your lack of success on a retarded made up fantasy than to look at yourself eh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:02 PM
7

There’s a difference between saying looks matter & autistic blackpillers saying ONLY looks matter and unless ur giga chad it’s over for you. The latter is what annoys people because it’s observably false
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:57 PM
–

mean normal guys. I don’t believe men are divided into 2 categories, chad & beta. Life isn’t black and white like that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:42 PM
–

What about guys who meet their girl young and settle down?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:29 PM
–

The rest does matter then
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:00 PM
–

If the threshold is impossible to meet how do most men find partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 03:40 PM
–

That pew link says 23% of children live in a “single parent” household (single dads included). The norm is still a 2 parent household where both are the biological parents. Doesn’t negate anything i said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:47 AM
–

I obviously didn’t mean children are aware of the legal status of their parents. The fact is children born to married parent do the best in life on average. Also, because you never met a women who doesn’t have causal sex therefor they don’t exist? You guys hate when “bluepillers” share personal anecdotes, but when you make sweeping generalizations based on your experience it’s fine. I’m “hot guy” too. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/0Uu7j8oZJg Just a few days on this sub people were c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:24 AM
–

I don’t understand the mystery. Marriage is an economic relationship. You and her combine your assets, create connections with her family, and leave your wealth for your children and they continue to marry, increasing the family fortune each generation. Many careers also often have a hard ceiling for unmarried men. The nuclear family is literally a building block of civilization. The redpill often describes the behaviour of lower class women. UMC or UC women aren’t single mothers, high body coun…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:20 AM
–

Most women do not become single moms. They meet a guy within their age range + or - 2 years while in their early 20’s. They grow together and experience the last of their irresponsible years together which often turns into marriage around 27-29.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:09 AM
–

So now not only does body count make you a ho, but fucking you too quickly does too. Nice moving of the goal posts. Your second paragraph is a complete straw man of the point i was making. I never advised marrying an ugly girl no one wanted. Just like you cherry picked Jeff Bezos i could cherry pick successful, loving marriages as well. Good luck finding your very hot, virgin, forever girlfriend. You’ll need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:04 AM
–

Ah yes you denizens of the manosphere are expert sociologists and have a keen insight into the nuance of human sexual relationships. You certainly don’t rely on hysteria, splitting defences and surface level psychology haha
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:26 AM
–

You think having a kid is less of a commitment than marriage? Once you’re a cohabitating couple in many jurisdictions you may as well be married. Marrying creates a legal family which is the environment children do best in. If you’re really a “top level guy” you should have no problem finding quality, educated women. If you’re selecting for the hottest women possible, you’ll miss out on a lot of good people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:22 AM
–

Most women are not hoes. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm The median body count for a women is 4.3 with most falling in the 2-4 range. Besides, smart men vet women well beyond how the women looks. Education, career trajectory, etc. The Upper class is having kids inside wedlock, consolidating their wealth, while risk averse people afraid of divorce will eschew marriage and have kids outside the nuclear family weakening their social bonds and leaving them with less. Emula…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:10 AM
7

“real man of the manosphere” haha
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:37 AM
9

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology) All or nothing thinking seems to be commonplace around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 12:55 AM
3

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/ Some else commented this same study, but roughly 1 in 6 women out-earn their husband as of 2022. That’s a large number of women, hardly “over” as you stated. Strange tactic if all women are gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 12:46 AM
4

I wouldn’t get into a relationship with a women if she was homeless. Does that make me a gold digger too? Wanting a self sufficient partner who pulls their own weight doesn’t = being a gold digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:56 PM
9

Ridiculous claim. Some of you guys have overdosed on the “redpill”. You can’t seriously believe 100% of LTR’s have a gold digger dynamic? it’s definitely a small % of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:14 PM
1

I think a lot of people find that serious, committed, long term relationships are absolutely worth the costs involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:53 AM
5

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:22 AM
–

Beta doesn’t mean ugly/repulsive you’re thinking omega. Betas are supposedly normal every day guys who have trouble maintaining attracting due to slipping to far into their beta comfort traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:58 PM
–

The term has always been a part of this sub. “High Beta” aka betafux was a term that meant a man who’s a provider, family man, with a good mix or alpha & beta traits and can maintain attraction. Alphabux isn’t an attractive provider. Alphabuxx would be a Tony Montana for example. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/N7TercFmYM here’s a link to what i’m touching on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:51 PM
–

Look up old threads with the term i used
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:40 PM
1

Providing for a family financially does not immediately make a man betabuxx. The term betafucks was meant to illustrate a provider who is also attractive to his wife. I don’t believe most men are betabuxx. Women aren’t en masse marrying/dating men they aren’t sexually attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:25 AM
2

So now self improvement is betabuxxing? lol ur wrong. The term is supposed to mean a man who is ONLY attractive as a nesting partner not SEXUAL ATTRACTION. Doing things for your gf/wife doesn’t make a man betabuxx.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 09:08 PM
7

The thing is when it comes to this sub is you guys often make up numbers in your head and pretend like it’s an accurate depiction of reality. The 10% figure you stated ultimately was made up. What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter