TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AwareManner76 Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by AwareManner76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good read, mostly agree except for the ending.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 11:44 AM
1

Promiscuity is a negative sum game. People seeking to fuck around and switching partners till they "find the ideal one" is not the way for the majority people to have stable and overall satisfiying long term relationships. The effect will be (is) the opposite. Also if men increase in number their approaches and sexual advances directed to women as you suggest, without selecting carefully for long term partner, this will make the SMV of the average men plummet even more compared to the average wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:09 PM
1

Probably those men found those other promiscuous women more physically attractive (not saying you are not attractive) Also it is unlikely that those men you dated were actually celibate men, at least most of them. If you sleep around and then you meet an actual attractive man with values and self control, it might be a turnoff for him. Anyways you have been more disciplined than the vast majority of women during those 4 years. I wish you best of luck in finding your soulmate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 02:08 PM
0

In one of your prior messages you say that a high body count is a red flag for a woman. Do you think it is a red flag for a man as well? No? Why? Yes? Then why don't you say being virgin past a certain age is a red flag for a woman as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:57 PM
3

Those are statistics that you are pulling out your ass. A lot of guys who just are desperately looking for sex and can't get it will end up paying for it. Or will just keep trying till they bang a woman who will usually be unattractive. Many of those who actually remain virgins either don't care or have high standards. Sure, some of them maybe don't care anymore because they have given up (but they still have enough pride/ don't care enough to pay). But how are you so sure they are the overwhelm…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 02:17 PM
1

Why do you assume that a virgin guy never met a woman who was willing to have sex with him? Would you say the same about a 30 year old virgin woman? This idea of men, in general, willing to fuck any woman is just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 01:59 PM
13

Why is it fallacious? There are two categories (food, physiques), and different types of foods and physiques used as examples. The fact that one type of food can be liked does not mean that other foods are less liked, and the same happens with the types of physiques. I don't see how the analogy is faulty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 11:37 PM
1

What is the evidence or reasonings behind that claim? I'd argue people, both men and women, attach more or less feelings to sex depending on their sociosexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:07 PM
6

Your point makes a lot of sense. I actually agree with you. However, many of the woman who "settle down" do it just for convenience and not because their values actually changed, and eventually cheat. People with promiscuous past are more likely to cheat, also happens to men. I believe people can change and grow wiser, but the change of mindset and behaivour should come before the relationship, and not due to the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:41 PM

The best for society would be that the vast majority of relationships would be long term succesful, in order to create stable and functional family units. Many times, the people who have been in several relationships are not reliable long term partners, either because they don't have a substantial conviction on a long term compromise, or because they fail to spot red flags or lack of compatibilities (not saying it has to be your case). Divorce might be better than a miserable relationship, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:51 PM
0

Because of the patriarchy!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:39 PM
5

Monogamy ≠ sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:01 PM
1

If a rational conviction against promiscuity became dominant in society, there would be multiple ways to reduce promiscuity of powerful men. For example education from parents, or women's standards that would put pressure against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:47 PM
8

Mainly because public spending is way, way too high in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:36 PM
9

Economies can grow with a stable poplulation. A decline in birth rates to slightly below replacement, in order to make population grow more slowly till it plateaus, would not be bad. But fertility rates way below replacement are real bad regardless of the economic model.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:34 PM
4

Yeah. I mean, I don't oppose the idea of taxing more the very rich (economic analysis would be needed to determine the right way to do it). But that wont solve anything by itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:29 PM
67

I talk as an european, but I think the situation in the US is similar, maybe not as bad. The main problem is that continously low birth rates make the proportion between the population who does not work and the population who does to become too high. This compromises a excesive high proportion of public spending in order to satisfy the needs of the elderly. This causes a lot of economic pain to the average joe: higher taxes, decreased quality of the public services, and increases the possibilty …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:02 PM
1

There are many exciting things you can do on your own. Even dangerous ones. By the way, who the f just travels to places where he knows people?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 12:24 PM
1

Many women have casual sex, or make out with some guy in the club. Some do it often, some do it from time to time. The women who avoid any kind of sexual contact outside of a committed relationship are the huge minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:37 AM
2

You might be sexually attractive, fun and with a social life and be a good person. Or not. You can be unattractive and lonely and be a good person, or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 06:19 PM
1

Yeah, I get it. Where I am from, there are very, very few young people living in rural areas. It changed a lot last century.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:31 PM
2

For example? Where do the non-promiscuous people gather?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:47 PM
1

What kind of spaces are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:33 PM
0

But those low or low-ish standards for casual sex cause important harm. I believe promiscuity has a net negative impact in society in comparison to monogamy. And usually, the more attractive someone is and the more promiscuous that person is, the bigger the harm. Many women would be more willing to settle with their male counterpart, and less likely to cheat, if they hadnt had casual sex with many guys beforehand. Or if they didnt have such easy access to casual sex with attractive males. If you…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:49 PM
4

Your standards should be somewhat according to what you can offer. For example, if you are not very attractive, but you are kind, honest, etc, you should ask for the same. If you have certain values that are important for you, dont date someone whose values are incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:43 PM
30

It would be more beneficial to everyone if men raised their standards, instead of women lowering theirs. Actually, it would probably make some women lower their standards. The problem is that the men whose standards are the most important are the ones who do have easy access to women. If only "incels" and undesired men increased their standards, their would be mostly useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:58 AM
2

Out of the men that dont want a promiscuous woman, many are not coherent, but some actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:28 PM

And many people who think that have lots of "friends" actually have none, or just one or two. By definition, it is almost impossible to have lots of friends, the word "friend" is way overused. It is useful to have contacts that can help you in certain areas tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:57 PM
2

Okey gotcha. Usually its true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:45 PM
1

A woman like perspective or a woman's perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:41 PM
7

Wow, did I say anything about my personal situation, or did I attack you? you must feel very miserable to write that passive agressive comment out of nothing. I hope you start doing better soon. Regarding the online dating market, it is obvious that there is a huge discrepancy between the results of an average man and average woman with similar profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:34 PM
7

Yes it is broken, mainly due to most men lacking standards and values, and most women having a huge abundance of options and making poor choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:15 PM
2

Yes you can, as I said procreation is the main purpose of sex but that doesnt mean I think sex should be used just for procreation, so I would not forbid or morally coerce you not to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:08 PM
3

Sex"s main value for humans is procreation. Its the reason why it exists. It can have other purposes, of course, I dont mean sex should be used just for procreation. However its the most important purpose of sex, by far. And emotional bonding is very important when procreation happens, so that both partners are more likely to cooperate in the raising and well being of the offspring. So emotional bonding is and should be deeply related to sex. When its not, usually, bad things happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:17 PM
1

I think there is some truth in what you are saying. But society usually likes to look to some things that are not the norm with a negative prejudice instead of a neutral one, without in depth discussion. You need to look at every particular case with an open mind, which many people dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:54 PM
1

There are many reasons that could explain that without being something negative. Maybe she is wise enough to know what she wants since a young age and she knows how to spot red flags better than others, or to find obstacles that would likely hinder the relationship long term. I am a 22 yo guy that has never been in a relationship, and there are many, many factors involved, and I would argue most of them define me positively and others neutrally, but not negatively. People consider it normal to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:16 PM
2

Would you prefer a woman who had been in one or two relationships that ended because she did not make the right choice or there were not realistic long term prospects?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:40 PM
2

Or maybe she just didnt find a person to create a long term bond with, and doesnt want sex outside a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:14 PM
1

You dont need evidence, just to think about it. Consciousness exists as something backed by physicality, but it cant be described in physical terms. Consciousness is not synapsis. So there are things about it that we cant explain with our current knowledge. We cant claim to fully understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:44 PM
1

Consciousness exists aside of the physical reality we know. It has a basis in our reality, but it is not something physical you can point out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:57 PM
1

Humans have consciousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 12:23 PM
1

What evidence? Not enough evidence for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 12:02 PM
1

You cant prove determinism either. We just dont know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:47 AM
2

There are men who wont have sex with a woman before several dates and getting to know her well. Even if she offers. Actually, a woman wanting sex fast would be a turnoff/red flag. Its not that common, I know, I wish there would be more people like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:56 PM
2

A lot of men dont date for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:11 PM
1

Abnormally based 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:54 PM
3

Lol I dont believe in no fap's theories. I agree with most of your post, but I think you misunderstood me. The reason why porn is used to get dopamine is because you can masturbate and orgasm without the porn, but you wont get the same amount of dopamine. So the main reason to watch porn is to get extra dopamine while you masturbate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:05 PM
2

I dont agree with that, the main reason to watch porn is to get dopamine from the images you are watching.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 12:55 PM
3

I dont think the majority of women have had a lot of sexual partners, but the most of them hook up from time to time. Some do it often, some ocasionally. The women who reject and avoid any casual hookup by principle are the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:35 PM
10

To create emotional rollercoaster for them ( many love it or cant avoid it) and to see if you stay calm or not which will increase attraction or decrease it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 12:19 PM
-1

You can have stuff in common even with age gap. Not common but it can happen. Both hobbies and values.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:50 AM
2

This is why stable families which positively and rationally educate in monogamic values, and in looking for the right traits in a partner, are very important.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 12:40 PM
1

Not my piece of cake, but I can agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 04:53 PM
1

I ve been to +5 clubs. And they are exactly how I described them. I find it weird you mention porn lol. Of course it is not impossible to know a potencial partner in a club, but a hedonistic environment with loud music its absolutely not the best place to meet someone who could become your partner. Especially if you dont enjoy clubbing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 04:06 PM
1

Could you elaborate your question a bit more, i dont know what you are asking exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:30 PM
1

I didnt complain about not being able to meet women, nor I said that everyone who is in the club parties often. However, the women I would be interested in would probably prefer other kinds of leisure time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:27 PM
1

There can already be something in common depending on the place you meet, for example the gym, if you like to go for walks... And of course I think you should talk to women that give you the impression or vibe that they are the kind of women you like. I would go as far as saying that I, personally, wouldnt even cold approach the majority of women I find somewhat physically attractive, based on the lack of the correct vibe. I wouldnt be the kind of guy to advice to talk to many women, but some mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:23 PM
1

Of course it is not impossible to meet a suitable partner in a club. However it is absurd to deny that it is an hedonistic environment with annoyingly loud music. If you dont enjoy clubbing it doesnt make sense to go there just to get to know women. And me personally wouldnt date someone who parties and gets drunk often.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:13 PM
1

Thats a good idea if you want a hookup. If you are looking for something serious, connections are not going to be made in a place like a club. If you meet a woman at the bar, you can talk and then exchange numbers or social media. You arent going to create any further connection going to a club after that. Of course you can hookup right away, but I find that something stupid if you are looking for a long term partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:10 PM
1

Anywhere where you are not clearly disturbing the person you are talking to. You should just avoid environments where the woman can feel vulnerable (dark, no one around...) and avoid approaching someone who most likely doesnt want to be disturbed (walking quickly, headphones at the gym, etc.).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:04 PM
1

I mean that maybe its not the best idea to cold approach at night in a deserted street, for example. Or when someone is clearly busy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:37 PM
1

Bars are better for that. Clubs are just places with very loud music crowded with drunk people, many of them seeking sex or validation. Not the best environment to seek a connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:36 PM
2

Clubs are a terrible place to find a long term partner. The other options are not likely to be viable for some. Maybe your friends dont know anyone you are interested in, or maybe you dont have the time or interest to be involved in social organisations. Cold approaching in a respectful way and an acceptable environment is not a bad idea for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 12:30 PM
2

So you dont want guys to use online dating and you also dont want them to cold approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 12:16 PM
-2

Well, for me the thing regarding this topic, is that if feminists with a good economic position really wanted to empower themselves and be coherent with their views, they would be open to provide for a good, kind, attractive man who could be a great, working, loving stay at home dad. Why is this not the case in the vast majority of cases? Probably because they cannot supress their instincts/social conditioning, depending of your POV.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 10:36 PM
1

Well, I think preselection makes women make very questionable choices quite often. You are assuming that womens' criteria is spot on. Sometimes it is, but others it's not. It depends on the person and the circumstances. Many very sexually active men are moral scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 01:07 PM
2

Okey, after replying I read other replies from you and I understood it better, thanks (:
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 01:00 PM
1

What are the vibes you are looking for? Can you rationalize it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 12:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter