TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AxiomQ Archive

View 1 post and 62 comments by AxiomQ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Looks like he does not align with the values of this subreddit, should he be a mod? My understanding of this sub has always been that it is about femcels, anti extremism, not anti female incel propaganda.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 06:15 PM
5

Just going to put this out there, that afternoon they did not help out a suicidal teenage girl, I would like to believe anyone who had literally that day help someone from such an awful position would then hours later go into a thread and kick up a fuss about a group of people getting support for that exact thing.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:15 PM
8

Same I wanted to award one of them that was questioning the legitimacy of the bio with the "hehehehe" award but you can't award them if you are banned. Did make me think though, fresh account, anonymous awarding, could be quite a good way to troll them.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:30 PM
43

My favourite is when they arrive at clear jokes or details that clearly give away it's a joke, they wonder if it is satire but then continue to ramble about how ridiculous this part of it was. Like "what childless woman has a mini van? What a ridiculous requirement" like no shit Sherlock, if this didn't give it away nothing will. Ultimately the joke lands back on them as they proceed to complain about the bio's ridiculous requirements with such little self awareness they don't realise these are …
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:25 PM
282

Desperate white knights hoping to get their dicks sucked, every time.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/21 02:38 PM
2

This reeks of "Daddy bought me this"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/21 09:23 AM
1

Imagine unironically being anti-capitalism but then also part of your requirements be that you are successful within capitalism and own 20 acres of farm land.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/21 07:12 AM
6

Apparently they have a thing that just automatically bans accounts interacting with subreddits they deem bad subs, so by talking here you are probably getting banned even if you opposed the post. Or so they claim.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/21 11:12 PM
1

You might say that your counter argument was a checkmate.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/21 11:10 PM
2

Psychosis is something I have experience someone else having pre diagnosis and I think that should be a bigger concern for her than finding another partner, which makes me wonder if she actually has it or not. Person became totally disillusioned, they were adamant that I wasn't telling them "what you have done?" and that "he won't let me stop until you tell me, so please tell me" this went on for hours and our mutual friend who knew them far better went silent pretty early on as they knew someth…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/21 09:58 AM
46

My favourite part of the comments is that one points out that the forbidden fruit is a representation of knowledge and that women are reaching out for knowledge even if it means disobeying a god. However much like the video misses out other details like the fact it always represents temptation, sin and evil... telling half truths is definitely something FDS has a big issue with.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 04:25 PM
69

Well she's in shape to start with.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/21 10:58 AM
2

Conquerers and terrorists are not mutually exclusive definitions, you can conquer and invoke terror purposefully, you may conquer because you invoked terror. You are more than welcome to look up the definition for terrorism and how you become a terrorist by definition.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/21 01:09 AM
2

That is the literal definition, terrorism isn't a new thing, Attila the Hun could be considered a terrorist, William Wallace could be and is by many historians considered a terrorist, many of the actions they took were with the purpose of invoke terror upon whomever they were opposed to. Mainstream media has used the word terrorist incorrectly for so long many people now don't actually understand what defines a terrorist, the correct use of the word should almost always reference affiliations so…
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/21 12:54 AM
6

Well no, terrorist by definition are just people/groups who act to purposefully invoke terror into people, typically innocent people and of a belief that is not their own. White supremacists work to invoke terror, and so are terrorists, however the same could be said about BLM and the recent "kill the bill" movements in Bristol UK, if the objective was to cause terror they are terrorists. Terrorists that work to destabilise a country would probably be referred to as Anarchists Terrorists as the …
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/21 05:24 PM
2

"maximum female benefit" interesting way they have decided to word that but I think "female supremacy" would be more honest from them, we would allow white supremacist to say their organisation is simply "maximum white benefit".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/21 01:11 PM
2

By stating that the male numbers are higher because they are also disadvantaged in another aspect, it's not rocket science.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 09:10 PM
2

Jesus you really are just that stupid.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 09:03 PM
1

That is the right way, just because an idiot can't understand it doesnt make it wrong, I'm sorry you weren't given the opportunity at an education.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 08:24 PM
1

By raising awareness to men's lack of opportunity in the UK and the dangerous consequences when coupled with poverty?
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 08:04 PM
1

Helping who?
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 07:59 PM
1

Can you read? not to be rude or anything but that comment makes me seriously question it, because I've been pretty clear what the deeper meaning of gangs being predominantly male means in the UK, and yet you still seem to completely miss the point.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 07:53 PM
0

I'm giving context to why the numbers are high around certain ages, and pointing out the vicious cycle for that age range due to poverty and lack of opportunity for males driving them into crime. What is disgusting is attempting to paint the picture as I was attempting to say that men are doing it to men just because they are men, what a sad pathetic little life you must lead that you would make that allegation when I detailed to you exactly what I was saying but rather than just accept it and g…
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 07:49 PM
-4

Quote that part, I pointed out that gangs in the UK are largely populated by males, my implications from this is that as we know gangs often form due to poverty and lack of opportunity. Females in the UK are given more opportunity hence why gangs tend to be males, the point was to show why the numbers are so high within that age range, and anyone with a brain cell could work out the rest but it turns out you needed it spelling out for you.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 07:39 PM
-4

That's a 10 for mental gymnastics.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 07:31 PM
4

You are most definitely mistaken, I was showing that gangs in the UK are typically made up of males, so when there is an attack and someone is stabbed it is a likely a man. This is a cultural issue that stems from, often, poverty and lack of opportunity that by extension you could argue is hard hitting on the males in that environment as the government attempts to "level the playing field" elsewhere.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 04:05 PM
5

When did I say it was better or worse in literally any of my posts? How you came to the conclusion that was what I was saying is baffling.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 03:25 PM
-4

Just stating that crime rates surrounding knife crime and gangs is quite high in the UK, so the numbers around those ages will be particularly high.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 03:04 PM
-27

Whilst I think this is definitely important to point out I feel like it should be said that the number is much higher purely through gangs fighting and knife crime, of which men tend to be both the perpetrators and victims often. Not to play these statistics down, just thought it was worth putting some context on where the numbers probably are coming from.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 02:08 PM
7

That part was too fold for me, one as you point out if you have the money you likely wouldn't buy from IKEA anymore but given the pandemic I'm willing to believe that they were not able to view furniture from more bespoke shops. Then there's the statement itself being so ludicrous as a listed a accomplishment that I got the feeling it's a troll or satire.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/21 10:23 AM
11

Initially yes but as soon as they were pushed to the stairs they were all backing off, these guys followed them up the stairs, grabbed the one that seemed to be at the centre of the fiasco and launched her off a wall before jumping down to punch and kick her against the wall. Male or female they crossed the line when they followed them up the stairs, the women in this backed off really early.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/21 02:08 PM
9

It was but it is mostly used these days as a space for females to echo chamber toxic notions about men, and then feel justified. Thankfully they are so toxic they will likely never find their perfect man and if they do he won't be interest in a toxic bitch when there is plenty of beautiful, level headed, interesting women out there. Be thankful this subreddit exists it's weeding out the bad ones for us!
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/21 01:24 PM
1

Great example of how easy it is to manipulate statistics.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/21 08:00 PM
4

Why'd they think he was working for an eternity?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/21 05:22 PM
1

Honestly I'm just still affronted that they had the audacity to attempt to create a community name for themselvess and insert themselves into the LGBTQ+ community.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 11:56 AM
4

Minor Attracted Person, basically pedophile, they keep trying to insert themselves into the LGBTQ+ community but are naturally rejected. However someone has just pointed out it is in fact the transgender flag.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 11:02 PM
4

You sure? I thought they were part of the LGBTQ flag, that flag looks a lot like the MAP flag Edit : looked it up, you are right transgender flag, the map flag is similar but it goes from light blue, through white to red.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 11:01 PM
5

The flag on the left is I'm fairly confident the MAP flag, I can only hope that because it is beside the word "against" that they are against MAP.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 08:37 PM
29

The reality of the list often goes like this, shop premises are leased, the house is still mortgaged, the BMW is a basic model with no additional trimmings and is finaniced through the business as a company car because they cannot afford the tax to purchase or run it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 12:50 AM
9

When did they start digitally printing buildings into existence, I must have missed that development. This is why so many consider office worker aloof and that they seem to have no concept of how the world works outside of their cubicles, because of people like her that genuinely believe that most of the world is digital now. True many previously paper jobs have gone digital but how do they think it facilitated? "everyone shops online" yes but who organised your order? Who delivered it, hell who…
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/21 01:10 PM
1

This post is more in reference to the comments section below the post, what the post is referring to is pretty vague and I think it's open to interpretation such as your own based on trauma you have endured yourself. The first image was simply there to show context, to show what the thread was about, my issue was entirely with the comment made in which this was a "gendered" which I'm sure you can agree is as ridiculous as racial prejudices.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/21 01:19 AM
1

Not when it's a "gendered issue" that's the equivalent of being concerned when someone you love speaking to a black person and you go to the comments section claiming it's effectively hardwired in because black people can't be trusted. That's the point here the comment's section quickly just became hate speech.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/21 11:10 AM
1

It's more in reference to their comments, in which they effectively just claim that it's a "gendered" issue. Guess we just don't agree on how to perceive people, I assume people mean well and so they have to prove themselves to be bad, but equally you shouldn't trust them with anything particularly personal or important to yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/21 02:08 AM
1

If you remove gender and put in races, black for example, you can see how flawed and discriminative this logic is. Trust isn't a binary thing, it's not a case of yes or no, you can trust people to varying degrees and that is exactly how you should approach people, with a level of trust they are not an awful person but not so much you would invite them into your home. Nobody is saying that anyone should trust anyone else completely, but to label people monsters and "if they get offended they are …
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/21 12:47 AM
5

They don't deserve the attention.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 09:20 PM
2

A question many of them have already asked themselves I'm afraid.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 08:43 PM
2

Personally I think this is the way most people are raised, this subreddit in particular has a dangerous echo chamber created by their mods that remove anyone who posts an opposing view or points out hate speech. The problem with echo chambers is of course validation, people looking in see the validation and believe that this is an acceptable opinion/ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 08:21 PM
7

Their sub is literally full of hypocrisy and flat out hate speech, it reminded me why I don't agree with the feminist movement anymore. I'm all for equality and giving women the fair shots they deserve, but this is the type of shit that is completely unacceptable.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 07:43 PM
2

Oh I know, but when they restrict all discourse to only allow anything that contributes to the echo chamber it's the best way to point it out to them still.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 05:05 PM
14

Just couldn't believe that they doubled down in the comments, I won't link the subreddit (I think most know of it) but it is so toxic.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 02:06 PM
7

You should be thankful FDS exists to pull these toxic, uneducated fools away from dating. Their standards for acceptable are often ridiculous, they would not hold themselves to those standards and get offended when they feel they even may be held to just a fraction of them, and have managed to convince themselves they all deserve their fairy tale man. They comment and pass judgement on things they know very little about, the other day saw a post saying to "get yourself a simp" to say you should …
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/21 12:17 AM
13

It's like the Eric Andre meme
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/20 12:29 AM
5

"This was my plan all along 😈" as if to imply she has any relevance to the world, any impact. Going to take a wild guess here and say she's a feeble little bitch which accepts a her food at restaurants even if it's completely wrong to not cause a fuss, but then goes home and will post about how she launched it across the room and choke slammed the waiting staff.
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/20 08:37 AM
22

There is a special card they play to make weak people buckle, it's called "sexism" whenever something goes against them they just whip this card and people yield.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/20 04:47 PM
6

I would go as far as to say it's not only a myth but it's actually on the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 02:30 PM
1

Thought this was about breaking down inequalities? Men shouldn't get a leg up and women shouldn't get free passes. Literally I don't think I ever see sexist posts on this sub, I can't speak for the comments but the posts are normally just women not being allowed to play the woman card to get more privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/20 04:14 PM
17

Sheep and bandwagoning fools often end up contradicting themselves, it comes with the territory of not thinking for yourself and having the balls to voice your own thoughts even if they go against the grain. That said social media, especially reddit, can be extremely echo chambery and so when an opposing comment is made it is not brought to the top and will be shouted down by those that do see it. Even within the subreddit, if someone were to oppose a post made, even if they brought a valid poin…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/20 11:19 AM
41

The irony of it actually being called parenthood.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 10:47 AM
1

Not sure the clip should actually be here, she got a pass. She murdered someone then got away with claiming it was an accident and managed to get it passed, receiving just 6 years for murder is a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/20 07:35 AM
3

And actually if you watch the video till the end you will see her friend actually also tried to hit him first, but he was actually prepared this time and actually turn to tables to lay an actual beat down on her.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 03:53 PM
1

Probably the same people who complain about Trumps COMMENTS years ago too. Actually acting on something years ago is okay, but making a vulgar joke years ago is not okay.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 11:36 AM
3

You didn't got me you know.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 11:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter