TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AxiomaticAcolyte Archive

View 2 posts and 21 comments by AxiomaticAcolyte on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Obviously, it’s pleasurable to do so. As I’ve said, the problem I have with it is an ethical one. I came here trying to be disproven and I’ve been met with nothing more than hostility. It would seem most people are thinking with the wrong heads. I can agree on a post from someone and disagree with another premise they may hold. This isn’t something that is ever addressed in TRP and I believe this is a conversation that needs to be had.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 07:05 PM
1

You literally presumed my family had a high notch count then continued to imply that I had some cognitive dissonance relating to it. Your default stance is to assume that’s the case. Then you have a disregard for society which I simply don’t share.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:58 PM
1

Change starts with the individual.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:54 PM
-1

This philosophy? TRP has lots of different contributors. I can agree with some things (I agree with most) and disagree with other areas. I love TRP and I’m glad I found it. I have an issue with hook up culture and I’m open to being proven wrong but I just see people getting upset when they bring up bad points. I’m not asking people to justify their choices to me, but when they don’t even have logic to back up their own choices, it’s fairly telling that maybe something is going on here.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:49 PM
-1

An ad hominem and IQ comment in the same sentence? Very classy and not cringe worthy at all. You’re missing the entire point of my argument, it has nothing to do with me finding a unicorn. This is a societal issue. I understand this is a big “no no” in TRP to bring up, but this is a critical conversation to have. Dismissing it as “OP can’t get a unicorn” is immature. This decadence esc mentality is precisely what’s causing many of our social issues. I linked this in another comment, but I encour…
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:47 PM
1

Yes, I agree. Hence why I used the term “random”. However, I have no problem with my family members engaging in sexual activity in the confines of a monogamous relationship. Why? Because monogamy is the most stable structure for society. Is it fun? No shit, we’ve all done it. Is it ethical? I don’t believe so. Watch Peterson talk about this. Pair bonding is a real observable phenomena. There is scientific literature to back this up. Every time two people engage in sex, oxytocin is released - whi…
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:39 PM
0

I am willing to listen, but I’m also going to dismantle bad answers. That’s the only way to find the truth.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:27 PM
0

I don’t buy this black pill notion that all women somehow have an unquantifiable notch count. While it’s certainly the majority of women, I’ve seen evidence to the contrary. Congratulations though, you missed my entire point. I wasn’t claiming that the women in my family somehow had golden pussies. My question was very simple: Why would you fuck someone else’s daughter, mother, or sister when you would NOT want that happening to your family? No shit women want it? Men want it too. Just because i…
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:21 PM
-1

You are directly harming society by participating in hook up culture and perpetuating western culture (assume you live in the west) into a further state of decadence. In essence, it’s actions like these which are contributing to the destruction of the nuclear family. Is your sister a grown adult? Yes. Do you think it would be healthy for her to participate in hook up culture? I doubt it. Men lead. Women follow. If high status men gave women the cold shoulder to hookups, I have no doubt the west …
/r/askTRP11/12/19 06:13 PM
3

Based on what study?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 08:02 PM
3

I think you need to clarify your argument, because it’s unclear what you’re stating in the original post if you truly don’t disagree with me. In regards to your statement about men, this anecdotal evidence doesn’t precisely hold up well in a debate; which is fundamentally the purpose of this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 06:37 PM
8

I feel like Occam’s Razor is a relevant concept in this case. It makes more conceptual sense that a lack of strong pair bonding between a couple would cause conflict in a relationship than ‘men are just selfish’. Could you direct me to information where I could read about ‘men being selfish lovers’ though? I truly don’t understand where you are coming from here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 04:09 PM
17

That’s anecdotal evidence. The argument wasn’t that it’s impossible for a woman with a high N count to pair bond in some capacity, but that diminishing returns make it harder to do so. How else would you explain the increase in divorce rates amongst higher N count individuals? I’m hard pressed to conjure up some sort of confounding variable that would be at play here. I am open minded though. Also if you have no quarrel with my point - then I’m confused what your argument is? It seemed that you …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 03:56 PM
20

I’m not interested in finding an LTR that’s a virgin or has a low body count as a “trophy”. When you have sex with someone, you release oxytocin (the pair bonding hormone). The more people you have sex with, the more people you’re pair bonding with. Thus, it becomes harder to settle down with someone if you’ve racked up a high N count. There have been numerous studies which have shown the higher a partner’s N count, the more likely it is for them to get divorced. So why wouldn’t a low N count be…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 03:37 PM
2

Appreciate the advice man. The situation seems trickier than I first envisioned after reading some of the comments. I’m questioning if this is even worth it lol
/r/askTRP09/09/19 04:01 PM
2

Appreciate this comment a lot, thank you man.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 03:59 PM
1

Lol, Kibitzer.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 08:02 AM
1

I’m confused mate
/r/askTRP09/09/19 07:58 AM
1

What? Lol.
/r/askTRP09/09/19 07:57 AM
1

Hah, if only we could be that direct. In regards to the second option, I feel like that might be too forward at this point. I say this partially because I’m not quite sure what type of event I’d invite her to. I also say it partially because she’s just some girl I casually flirt with that makes me tacos and bowls. I was thinking I might just say “you seem chill, we should hang out some time”. Perhaps this is too ambiguous though. I just don’t want to ‘put her on the spot’ in front of her coworke…
/r/askTRP09/09/19 07:54 AM
2

Lurked here for awhile as well, made a TW account for this. Is this talked about in any other detail on TRP? Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 08:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter