TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AylaCatpaw Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by AylaCatpaw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Ask him: "Okay, so this resonates with and you understand it, well then: am I dating you just for the DNA material that could be passed along to new offspring of mine, or am I dating you because you're a decent human being who could be trusted around children? As apparently those things are mutually exclusive, so which way is it?"
/r/ExRedPill23/11/25 03:01 PM
2

Well, perhaps not that you want to, as that might be coming on a bit strong when you don't even know each other yet, but that you're open for it and it's on the table, so that interactions have a chance of turning in that direction. But I guess it depends on the setting/context (and the person you're interested in potentially pursuing) too. Otherwise, yes, I definitely agree. Friendship may be up on the table anyways, but if you don't display or even hint at openness for anything beyond that, pe…
/r/seduction07/03/24 05:35 PM
5

Be warned that friends you do this to may feel extremely betrayed and it could kill the friendship. Don't do it unless you're willing to risk losing that person.
/r/seduction06/03/24 11:11 PM
3

Oh wow, too anxious for knitting...? Well it sounds like your anxiety may be holding you back from befriending people.
/r/seduction06/03/24 11:09 PM
7

They don't actually need to be hot, but knowing someone gets along well with women and is able to be platonic friends with women is a green flag in a lot of people's eyes (including mine). I would feel much more comfortable & safe approaching/being approached by a man like that, compared to a man who is in a group of other men; it would make for a less tense interaction. Btw, wouldn't it be possible for you to expand your "network" through your female friends, by acquainting yourself with people…
/r/seduction06/03/24 11:05 PM
4

Yeah, I agree. I wouldn't market those things OP wrote about what he has achieved (maybe hint at them), and would focus on trying to put forward parts of my personality, my humour, my interests/what I like to do for fun & skills and so on instead (if he's not strictly interested in similarly ambitious & successful people—but most people simply aren't going to be at his level nor have reached the same life goals he has at such a young age). Don't take this the wrong way, but I would never swipe r…
/r/seduction06/03/24 10:43 PM
1

Why would getting to know someone be mutually exclusive with playful, flirtarious communication?
/r/seduction06/03/24 10:31 PM
1

Right? I mean, it's not really even about the joke or intention (unless it was blatantly a mean or inappropriate joke due to context), it's about the person's behaviour. I would expect my friends to respond in an understanding and apologetic manner—especially if their intention was just to make a joke. If I'm trying to be nice, and it turns out that my actions for one reason or another isn't being considered nice by someone, then it is within my power to adjust my behaviour accordingly (for exam…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:39 PM
1

I reiterate my other comment to you: All right, I did not know. Here in Sweden, it would likely be very frowned upon if someone were to mention the gender of the offender in a way that could be construed as discrimination during sentencing; the same way it'd be highly inappropriate to mention a person's ethnic origin, religion etc. Judges need to be extremely impartial here. I wouldn't be surprised if it were illegal and could result in a mistrial, and having some sort of "judge's final statemen…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:41 PM
1

All right, I did not know. Here in Sweden, it would likely be very frowned upon if someone were to mention the gender of the offender in a way that could be construed as discrimination during sentencing; the same way it'd be highly inappropriate to mention a person's ethnic origin, religion etc. Judges need to be extremely impartial here. I wouldn't be surprised if it were illegal and could result in a mistrial, and having some sort of "judge's final statement" isn't the norm here; news articles…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:41 AM
1

A judge shouldn't state "I won't send a lady to prison for this" as it implies they would send a man to prison for the very same thing and that gender is a deciding factor when sentencing, which is highly inappropriate, inherently sexist and has no place in the justice system.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:50 AM
1

Which is a huge issue. It shouldn't be open for interpretation that gender is not a deciding factor when sentencing someone to prison; the judge should have used a gender-neutral word to underline that this sentencing is typical for the crime when committed by a young adult, as stating "I won't send a lady to prison for this" implies that the judge would send a man, which is institutional sexism. I personally don't even think it should be a factor at all, but it sure as hell should never be a de…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:46 AM
0

A huge issue is that the word "lady" should not have been used in the first place as it is inappropriate, and makes it open for interpretation whether this judge considers gender a deciding factor when sentencing someone to prison. If the judge had used a more appropriate word like "someone"/"a young adult"/"an 18-year-old", then it would have underlined that this is a typical sentence for this crime when committed by an immature offender.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:41 AM
1

Wouldn't you understand how somebody would be rightfully pissed off if you claimed you "wouldn't send a lady" to prison, instead of using appropriate words that aren't open for interpretation such as: "someone"/"an 18-year-old"/"a young adult"? If a judge were to tell me something like this when sentencing me, I would be outraged, and I am a woman. It implies gender is a deciding factor for that judge, which is unjust and highly inappropriate.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:29 AM
0

A judge must be mindful of what type of language they use; it should not be open for interpretation. The judge should have said "someone", not lady, to avoid these types of misunderstandings. It would underline the fact that nobody is sent to prison for this; that this sentencing is typical for the crime. And if the judge actually meant that they wouldn't send a woman to prison, implying they would send a man and thus that gender is a deciding factor to them when sentencing, then they are not ac…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:23 AM
3

So sexist injustice isn't worth acknowledging or preventing if the victims just happen to be from a more privileged social standing? Would you make that claim if she victim were a homeless man, or a male child? Sexism is inherently wrong.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:17 AM
1

In that case, the issue lies with his statement. "I'm not sending a lady to prison for this" implies he would send a man to prison for it, which is sexist. Your gender should never be a factor—especially not the deciding one—in whether or not you're sentenced to prison for a crime you've committed.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:10 AM
1

In what way could that possibly be interpreted as someone trying to "bait" you? Wow, you are a just goddamn dolt, aren't you? I'm Swedish.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:38 PM
1

Ah, I guess technically you're correct. I must've been reading from two post chains at the same time and misunderstood what you were replying to.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 04:46 AM
1

Yeah, but you're not jumping at the opportunity to bang children now that you're older, are you?
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:41 AM
1

You'd probably think the teacher is fucked up beyond belief in the head, though, once you'd reach her age. Especially when you look at 13-year-olds, and see children.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:30 AM
1

No, they really don't. But you're blatantly a child yourself, so you wouldn't actually know what we see.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:19 AM
2

It has never been historically normal or common or "fine" (read: generally survivable) for 13-year-olds to give birth. Neither has it been historically common for 13-year-olds to be able to successfully impregnate.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:09 AM
1

You do realize nobody has been questioning whether or not it's okay for a child to want to fuck an adult, right? The issue is obviously when an adult wants to fuck a child.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:57 AM
1

He was being aggressive towards her obviously was capable of making a coherent decision. Yeah, no. Like seriously, did you even read your comment? Do you not understand what a contradiction is? He was acting like a dumb, impatient, impulsive, socially incompetent, and emotionally immature child, because he is one.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:47 AM
2

You know what I'm reading? "Me, me, me, ME, ME, ME, ME, MEEEE!!" How about you stop plugging up your behind with your head for a moment, and attempt to comprehend the simple fact that people around you won't feel a certain way just because you do?
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:36 AM
2

Jesus christ wtf, "he didn't say no"? Neither did the person who was drugged, threatened, passed out, sleeping, coerced, injured, in a coma, mentally impaired, choked, duct-taped, terrified speechless, too young. Do you actually think rape victims often manage to say "no"? The law is fine. The extremely few exceptions don't justify grooming, sexualizing and having intercourse with barely-pubertal children.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:25 AM
1

Well, considering she had to aggressively groom and rape a child in order to get some, I'd say it's highly likely that normal, well-adjusted adults, with standards and decency, notice she's not right in the head. 'No' is the obvious choice.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:15 AM
2

Own your feelings. Everyone has them.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 06:51 PM
5

I honestly couldn't care less whether or not someone is a virgin or not. I assume everyone I meet above the age of 18 has been laid anyways. And if they aren't, I assume it's by choice or disinterest. I have no reason to think otherwise. Virginity isn't outwardly visible, and thus virgins can't be seen as losers. My bf was a virgin; didn't find out until afterwards.
/r/ExRedPill03/12/16 02:24 AM
14

If you think all attractive people are confident, then you're sorely mistaken.
/r/ExRedPill03/12/16 02:19 AM
0

When you have guns, none of those things matter anymore. End of argument.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter