Aym0r Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced I do let it slide depending on what is being attacked, i'd take a generalization based on my race a lot more seriously than on my gender, but regardless, i already told you why i believe i would be justified in feeling that way	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/05/26 04:49 AM
0	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced It could just be a nurture thing for all we know, just the feeling of being smaller and physically weaker can be enough to deter you from violence even if you might make the cut with a weapon, and perhaps that can in the end result in a less violent nature overall and vice versa. It could be the testosterone too but i think people tend to be a little too cynical at times with biology. Regardless, i do not agree with collective blame.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 03:41 PM
0	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced That is one argument against racism yes, no race is really born criminal, it's most often class, culture, etc. driving the actions so it would be wrong to blame their race itself for it. Now think that way about gender, why is most violence committed by men? Men are much physically stronger than women. So it's much easier for a man who wants to be violent to be violent compared to a woman. So you can use your own argument here too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 03:03 PM
7	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced Of course not, if i was some disabled old man, alone at night and there was some dude who looks like a gang member in front of me, i'd book it out of there too because my safety is more important than absolute moral righteousness, but that doesn't mean i'll go online and call every tattooed dude a hooligan now.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 02:01 PM
2	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced Y'know sometimes when you let the other person get the last word in an argument, it feels like you've lost? Like everyone else will agree with them now. I've learned that some people simply can't stand that feeling, they'll drive a debate from one topic to another before they admit any form of defeat. I'll admit i don't like it either, but why'd it matter when i've already made my point? Maybe some redditors will now think i lost, but there are many things more important to me than a redditor's …	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:57 PM
6	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced now THIS is gaslighting	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:45 PM
3	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced it's the conclusion i've naturally drawn from that quote	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:44 PM
4	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced I'm wasn't talking about who's saying it, i was talking about why saying it would be wrong. Really clutching at straws now.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:40 PM
8	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced He literally said it? "The gender most responsible for violent crimes never changes."	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:33 PM
5	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced perhaps not in the true sense, but they're saying it. And i told you why i believe that would be wrong.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:32 PM
4	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced You're implying that the nature of the group is bad and you being good is some kind of an anomaly	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:28 PM
7	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced did nobody ever teach you why the concept of "One of the good ones" is bad?	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:22 PM
10	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced "The gender most responsible for violent crimes never changes." I'm unsure what else you could mean here?	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:19 PM
7	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced I'd like you to think from the perspective of the insulted person here. Imagine you're a part of some group that's committing 99 percent of all crimes but you're not one of them. Now that group is an unchangeable part of my identity, and if someone insults the group i would naturally feel insulted too even if i was "one of the good ones". And i'd be justified in feeling that way, as i'm being blamed for something i never did.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:18 PM
9	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced your argument was clearly "generalization is justified if a group overall makes up the vast majority of the crimes"	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:15 PM
8	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced Bad faith? I just repeated the same logic you told me	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:11 PM
7	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced So what? That doesn't justify collective blame	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:10 PM
7	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced it's not the number that makes it wrong, it'd still be wrong if some group was committing 99 percent of violent crimes	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:03 PM
9	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced Is that why you think racism is wrong? because the races committing the crimes vary in places? would racism suddenly be correct if in a hypothetical scenario there was one singular criminal race? Try to think once more	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 01:02 PM
27	When a man say “not all men” he’s seen as complicit and dismissive. When a woman says it, she’s being nuanced if statistics made generalization correct, racism would be correct. But i'm sure you know better than that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/05/26 12:47 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? the way its worded is clearly meant to say "women have it worse in dating too" I do not agree with that at all. But arguing with people here is the same as repeatedly hitting my head against a brick wall so each to their own.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 07:57 PM
0	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? "Of course we have advantages and disadvantages" "Its unequal for us" Is this a semantics issue? when someone says something is unequal for them, it typically means something is disadvantageous against them	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 04:28 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? disadvantage for the rest of the relationship and marriage stage, due to potential reproduction "I could potentially get hit by a car on the road, my life is in danger every minute i stand here on the sidewalk" good god this victimization complex	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 04:08 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? dating leads to sex which may lead to reproduction i know that, and i said that women have the advantage in the dating phase of it and not the reproduction	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 04:01 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? you implied it?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:50 PM
0	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? it is a result, but they are not the same things, and in one aspect women have an advantage and vice versa	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:46 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? "Hence why dating is so unequal for women" this does sound like calling yourself more disadvantaged	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:44 PM
-1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? "Hence why dating is so unequal for women"	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:39 PM
0	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? you literally did? I seperated dating and reproduction and you pointed that out as if i said something wrong?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:39 PM
-1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? bit unfair to call yourself disadvantaged at something you've got both advantages and disadvantages in, no?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:36 PM
-6	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? being related to something does not make two things the same? i'm not sure why you're projecting something other people said onto me, please go take out your anger elsewhere	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:31 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? i could think of a few more like being seen as more vulnerable and hence more pitiable by society in some aspects, or being seen as less violent, there's probably many more aspects to this but i'm not going to think about life as a whole for a reddit comment	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:21 PM
-1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? Reproduction and dating are two seperate things, you are disadvantaged in reproduction but not in dating.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 03:02 PM
1	Do you think biological realities playing into heterosexuality is a topic that leftists/feminists are ready to discuss? >"women have the slight power of being the pursued and the selector" >"Hence why dating is so unequal for women" ???	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/26 02:28 PM