TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Azraphale89 Archive

View 2 posts and 141 comments by Azraphale89 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

F&F are hypocrites. They'll sit there with a "Delusion Calculator," while ignoring the fact that they're just as unlikely to find the partner they're looking for in the US. A young, pretty virgin with conservative values who is "submissive" is rare enough. A young, pretty, "submissive" virgin with conservative values who is willing to date interracially and interfaith? Unheard of. Some southern Christian white girl who loves god and is saving herself for marriage so that she can be "the perfect …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:48 AM
27

I'm sorry, have you seen women's idea of "confidence?" It's not the quiet, "I'm capable of handling myself, and competent" real confidence. It's the loud, "I'm the fucking shit and I'm perfect in every way!" Watch these young girls in interviews, talking about how they're all "10's" and saying anything else means you don't have confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:36 PM
2

Wow. Over two years of job security, and you only have to show up for half of it, but get paid the whole time. Must be fucking nice.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 07:01 AM
0

Lol. Your poor boyfriend. You should just leave him before you inevitably cheat on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 06:55 AM
17

Pretty much this. Have you seen the guys that USUALLY are in these "open relationships?" They're all overweight, dorky, and look like they havent bathed in a month. Look at Destiny. The Twitch streamer in an "open" relationship with his much more attractive gf. Who you think is getting laid more, him or her? ETA: I also wanted to say that your girl having cheating with another man is humiliating enough. It's basically him being "better" than you. Letting another man do it? That's not just him be…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:32 AM
2

Lol. All these dudes get more sex than 95% of the guys on here, and definitely more than your average schlubs with beer guts. Are they pulling as much as GigaChad? No. But they're definitely pulling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 01:28 PM
3

I mean... yes, but most men don't have a lot of options to get that. That's why Onlyfans and Twitch girls are a thing. A lot of guys are so starved for attention that they'll pay money for a girl they've never even met to say thank you to a fake name. Also, it depends on how advanced the AI is. The "interaction" bar is at Twitch thot or OF model, so it's pretty low. If someone were to invent a sex bot that was able to exceed that level of connection, or even an upgrade to the chat bots like Repl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:26 PM
6

Chadbot won't have a 6 figure salary, a nice car, or be able to buy her fancy things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:52 PM
2

Yeah, but after they get cheated on or dumped for Chad, they'll 0probably just get a robot instead of diving back into the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:44 PM
13

Dammit, I forgot that women are always the most affected. I'll try to remember it next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:24 AM
1

100%
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:13 AM
18

Can't wait till it's your brother/father/son that gets blown up at war? Gonna go out and celebrate? You sure seem like the type.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:05 AM
2

Assuming that she would leave you for a hot guy when she’s presumably in love with you if what’s wrong it says men don’t think women are people capable of loving if we will just leave for a fickle reason like a hot guy Women cheat on men they "love" all the time because some hot guy hits on them. They then go on to write published articles defending their infidelity. Or just browse r/adultery. 40% of married women admit to cheating on their spouse. No. If average woman loves average man she’s no…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:18 AM
1

have seen people Bash “stacies” here just as much as average women. Average guys being bitter at average women for capitalising on their options makes no sense when men also capitalise on their options. That’s human nature. Men make it a sport counting notches on their belt and spinning plates pumping and dumping where they can. That's fair. Creating reasons such as refusing to be “leftovers “ is ridiculous. Why? My 5'6" ass is never going to compete with the dicking down she received from Chad …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:49 AM
2

But that's not the claim. We all know that hot chicks will always have top shelf options. The claim is that your average girl, your 5-6, will also have a sky high n count with the same guys you did, then go to the guys they rejected over the last decade to try and get married... usually after popping out a kid or two for Chad and Tyrone. That's their right, they can screw who they want. But there are fewer guys that are willing to take Chad's leftovers and even fewer who are willing to pay for C…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:30 AM
6

To be fair, if I'm going to buy a pair of bowling shoes, I don't get a used pair from the local bowling alley, I go get a fresh new pair from the store. The ones at the bowling alley are fine for an evening, as long as they've been thoroughly cleaned. Heck, I usually don't even care what they look like, since it's just a rental. But I'm not going to buy them and show them off to my friends. I don't want to own a pair of shoes that has had a million other dudes' sweaty feet in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:15 AM
1

Lol. Mhm. "Google the definition! But, not like, the ACTUAL definition. And not the one Google gives you, either! Google the definition, and ignore the definition that Google gives you, and ignore the technical definition, and scroll down to this OTHER definition that suits my narrative and doesn't make me a massive hypocrite!" Do you even listen to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 06:42 AM
1

I'm trying to decide if you're really this slow on the uptake, or if you're intentionally not getting it. Either way, no skin off my back. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 06:39 AM
1

You can't say, "Google the definition," then discount both the Google and official definition because they don't fit your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:56 AM
1

No, one describes beliefs, the other describes actions "stereotypically" attributed to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:53 AM
1

She literally said to Googke it. And Google, and the Oxford freaking dictionary disagree with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 05:51 AM
1

I understand just fine. I've always scored very high on reading comprehension. I understand the points that they want to make, they are just failing to do so. I also understand that they're talking out of both sides of their mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 03:39 AM
0

I'm just going by what she said, versus the definition. They are contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 03:21 AM
0

Lol. But we all agree that many women definitely exhibit these behaviors, too. Especially these days. Yet, there is no fancy term for when women do it. Why is that? Furthermore, she specifically said, "Toxic masculinity" does not describe specifically male behaviors. It describes a set of beliefs about how men should behave. The major one is "masculinity is mandatory for all men" and the rest define masculinity in ways that are toxic -- violent and incapable of emotional connection or strong emo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 03:03 AM
0

Yes, it is. She said: "Toxic masculinity is a term used to describe the way certain beliefs about masculinity can cause undesirable behaviors. It doesn't mean that those behaviors can't be caused by anything else, or that women don't do them, or that women don't reinforce them." The definition is: "a set of attitudes and ways of behaving stereotypically associated with or expected of men, regarded as having a negative impact on men and on society as a whole." These two things are contradictory. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 02:47 AM
-1

That is literally the opposite of what she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 02:36 AM
0

Yeah, you're full of shit. I DID google toxic masculinity. Here's what I got: 'A set of attitudes and ways of behaving stereotypically associated with or expected of men, regarded as having a negative impact on men and on society as a whole.'
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 12:26 AM
66

He's not married, im assuming. "Married and single women throw themselves at him" means that both single women and married women throw themselves at him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 03:20 AM
2

For the same reason why as an Atheist, I shut up and bow my head when my pastor grandfather says grace at Christmas dinner. There's no point in starting a debate. No one is going to take your side if you did. You just come across looking like a "misogynistic asshole."
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:07 AM
9

Strange, because most women I see walk around in leggings, an old t shirt and their hair up in a messy bun. No makeup. It's the new girl uniform, I guess. The only women I see "making the effort" are all at least 30+. And it's not just some young women, it's the vast majority. I used to think leggings were attractive, until girls turned them into the female equivalent of basketball shorts. I mean, they're better than sweat pants, but not by much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:02 PM
1

Recent Studies suggest that men and women cheat at roughly even rates (~40%). However, the validity of those studies have been called into question because women are less likely to admit to sexual activity in general, and infidelity even less so, even in blind studies. And since all these infidelity studies are self reporting... 1 in 3 paternity tests come back negative. 1 in 3. I also like how you're over here defending women's infidelity. it’s more likely to be someone she feels heard by or ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 05:56 PM
3

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 05:47 PM
4

Yeah, they date the sappy sensitive guy while secretly getting her back blown out by the douchebag pricks that she's actually attracted to. Not our first rodeo.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 04:49 PM
1

Exactly. The high n count is a symptom, not the disease. If a girl has a huge n count, there is almost assuredly SOMETHING wrong. Whether it's that she's a cheater, or is unable to commit, or is just giving it up in a series of ONS, there's a problem there, somewhere. I don't need to pretend like I'm a detective and find out what that problem is, I know it's there, and that I should dip.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:29 PM
2

The only woman you should ever be vulnerable to is your mother, because she is the only women who will ever actually care, and the only one who won't judge you for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 08:27 AM
12

Wow. This extremely misandrist article is your source? Oof.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:53 AM
9

There are literally hundreds of scholarships for women only. There are exactly zero that are for only men. See the problem here?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:48 AM
12

Says you. I think it's worse. Honestly, if a woman baby trapped me, I'd make it the most miserable experience I possibly could for her. Just go out of my way to get as much custody as possible, then be as difficult to coparent with as I possibly could. Jenny is grounded? Not at Daddy's house, she's not.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:00 PM
19

I had no say in whether that baby was born. She gets to decide if she wants 30% of my paycheck for 20 years on a whim lol. Eff that.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:53 PM
6

Lol no. Unless you want to live in a theocracy.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:33 PM
11

No. Because it's not the smartest people reproducing, often it's the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:32 PM
3

Yet again, you're trying to move the goal posts. Just accept the L and move on lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:54 AM
3

I asked if you trusted anyone to work for free for 5.5 years to pay for an investment only on their word. You said no. Your own logic and your own statements show that, by your own definition, you're insecure and have trust issues. Stop trying to move the goal posts just because you lost lol. Again, thanks for playing. Better luck next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:40 AM
3

Lol. Yes. Let's follow the logic. You said that anyone who doesn't trust their partner to not get them to pay for a kid that isn't theirs doesn't really trust their partner, has trust issues in general and is insecure. You didn't contest that paying for a kid is basically 5.5 years of working for "free." You admitted that you don't trust anyone to the extent of working for "free" for 5.5 years on their word alone, expanding on that being the reason why you would never put yourself in that situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 03:49 AM
1

The same people that are discouraging women from STEM (Which I don't think is the PATRIARCHY) discourage boys from school. Women are pigeon holed into "classically feminine" roles, while boys who do well in school are generally bullied. Meanwhile, most of the teachers are women, and they, along with the rest of society are telling young girls they are bad at math and science, while completely ignoring the fact that young boys learn in a completely different way than girls. We're pushing cooperat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 03:36 AM
1

I'm saying that BOTH examples are true. That women are encouraged away from STEM and that boys are disenfranchised, disincentivised, and therefore disenchanted with school.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Oh, do tell how I'm being hypocritical
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:25 AM
1

Just pointing out the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:22 AM
3

Lol. So you don't trust your husband. By your own definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:15 AM
1

Lol. Well, when women say they didn't go into STEM because they, "didn't want to," it's somehow a symptom of misogyny and the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:15 AM
3

Lol. So the answer is no. There's no one that you trust that much. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:14 AM
3

It's a hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:12 AM
1

Well, when almost 70% of college graduates are women, there's obviously something that needs to be addressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:03 AM
3

You still refuse to answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:02 AM
3

I never said that everyone else needs to accommodate my issues. Whenever the subject of marriage and kids first comes up in a relationship, I make two things very clear. First, that I'm never getting married, and second, that any child she says is mine is going to be subjected to a paternity test before I sign anything. If she's okay with that, cool. If not, there's the freaking door. No skin off my back. ETA: And you never answered the question: Is there anyone that you would work 5.5 years for…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:53 AM
1

That's literally one school. At pretty much every other school in the country, women outnumber men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:50 AM
3

I disagree. I'm thinking that you want to apply two different definitions of "trust" to two similar situations, because doing so is the only way you can defend your point without being hypocritical. I mean, child support is roughly 30% of your income. Over 18 years, that equals roughly five and a half years of salary. I'm willing to pay that for a child that's mine, no question. But what I wouldn't be willing to do is work 5.5 years for free to pay for some other guy's kid. So if I'm going to vo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:38 AM
2

Lol. So if I said that men are in leadership roles because they're "better candidates and less plentiful" than women, you'd buy that? No? Then why does that apply to women in college getting scholarships? Ffs. Do you people ever listen to yourself? And it's been proven that, all things equal, the woman will get the spot over the man in college admissions. Or even if the guy's application is only slightly better, it'll still go to the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 11:56 PM
3

How is it only for men's advantage? You're literally more likely to get accepted into a university if you're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 11:53 PM
3

I've already explained, multiple times, why it's an issue of trust. If you don't agree, or don't want to admit it, that's not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 09:02 PM
3

Lol. That is absolutely an issue of trust. You seem to confuse trust with, "I promise you've never made a single mistake ever." Lol. Your hypocrisy is still showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:46 PM
6

Lol. I'm assuming that you and your husband live together, right? So you're obviously trusting him to not blow all his money and leave you with all of the bills that month. That's a relatively low stake. But when the stakes are permanent and big, you want protection. In your case, both are an outcome of the same act: financial irresponsibility. If you can trust him not to be financially irresponsible in one context, you have no excuse not trusting him in others. Your hypocrisy is showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:23 PM
6

Both. When the stakes are relatively low, like a broken heart or wounded pride, I'm willing to trust her word. When the stakes are high, like 20 years, a quarter of a million dollars, and a 600 year old bloodline, then... yeah. I'm gonna need some confirmation and assurances. Just like you. When the stakes are low, you're willing to trust him financially. But when the stakes get bigger, like permanently affecting your credit or leaving you with massive debt, you protect yourself with a prenup.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:15 PM
5

Tell that to the ENM people. And the issue is still with him. You can say, "it's the lenders" until you're blue in the face, but that's just a red herring and you know it. You don't trust him to not fuck up your credit or leave you in debt, so you have a prenup. Again, I approve. But you don't get to then tell others that they need to trust their partners more, or judge them for showing similar levels of trust that you do. Because I trust my partner not to cheat. If she goes our with the girls, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:05 PM
5

Lol. If he defaults on the loan, they repossess the car anyway. If you trusted him, you'd trust him to make the responsible decision to sell the car, and purchase a car he can afford. So, no, the very act of having a prenup invalidated your entire argument. You don't trust your husband enough to be financially vulnerable with him... yet you're over here bashing me for not trusting a potential partner enough to stake a 600 year old bloodline, a quarter of a million dollars, and 20 years of my lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:43 PM
4

Well, then you'd need to trust him to make the responsible decision and sell the car before he defaulted. No, I think you getting a prenup is a smart move. 100% approve. But here's the thing... you don't get to walk around with a prenup and then lecture other people about trust. It just makes you look like a massive hypocrite. You don't get to financially protect yourself, then lecture someone else for financially protecting themselves, especially since a child costs a hell of a lot more than an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:31 PM
5

Oh, yes it is. See, if you trusted him, you'd trust him to not hurt your credit or finances by defaulting on a car loan. It's 100% about trust. You can dress it up however you want, but at the end of the day, you and your hubby don't trust each other enough to merge your finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:24 PM
2

Agreed. But he could fake it long enough to get elected. Trump did. He spent the entire campaign making false, vague promises, and was obviously unhinged, yet somehow ended up in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:22 PM
5

Oh, so you're a hypocrite. Don't you trust your hubby to not foist his debts on you? Why didn't you find a partner that trusted you not to leave him with your debts?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:14 PM
3

Lol. Most politicians spout vague aphorisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:11 PM
4

Lol. Cutting. There's a reason why your hubby wanted a prenup when he married you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:07 PM
0

Yeah, well that's not an option, either. As previously stated, I'm the last of my bloodline. I have to have a son. So I think I'll just get a paternity test, and find a woman who's not narcissistic enough to think that I should just base my entire life off of her word. Y'know... someone not completely entitled and crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 07:03 PM
2

Lol. What does that have to do with the topic at hand? You'll never have to trust someone on the level of "I'm entrusting my family's bloodline (of which I am the last) the next 20 years of my life, and a QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS, to you telling me the truth." And expecting that someone trust you to that extent is honestly narcissistic and entitled to the point of lunacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:56 PM
3

Very easy for you to say, since you'll never have to have that level of trust, or vulnerability.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:47 PM
4

Lol. Well, that's you. I don't trust anyone implicitly all the time. That's just dumb and foolish. Especially since we're talking about a 20 year, $250,000+ commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:43 PM
1

I think it's a difference in definition... of what a "3/10" actually is. Several studies have shown that women only rate 20% of men as "average or above." Which means that they think that an objective 8 is a 5 or 6 in her eyes. If we use this to extrapolate an entire scale, it would look something like this: Woman's Scale/Objective Scale 1/10 =1-2/10 2/10 = 3-4/10 3/10 = 5-6/10 4/10 = 7/10 5-6/10 = 8/10 7-8/10 = 9/10 9/10 = 10/10 10/10 = Doesn't Exist So, if we're going by a "Woman's 3/10," we'r…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 06:41 PM
3

No, but there aren't just two choices (trust and not trust.) There are multiple different levels. I may trust a friend to not steal from me... but I'm still not giving him a key to my apartment. I may trust my parents, but I'm not going to just believe everything they say just because they said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:29 PM
6

Lol... no. Trust is not binary. Everyone trust their SO to not screw them over, yet people still get screwed over. And there's not a single person on the planet, including my parents, that I would trust enough to sign a 20 year, $300,000 contract for sight unseen.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 03:57 PM
2

Partner A 3/10 looks 5/10 personality $60,000 Partner B 10/10 looks 5/10 personality $18,000 Men tend to go with Partner B and women tend to go with Partner A No, women will go with Partner A only after messing around and having a kid or two with Partner B. Or she'll go with Partner A while having an affair with Partner B. Or she'll marry Partner A, then divorce him, take half his shit, then start dating Partner B. Or she'll just be not interested in sex with Partner A, so they live their lives …
/r/MensRights18/06/22 03:43 PM
7

Lol. Totally forgot he's Canadian 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 04:28 PM
1

Oh yeah, forgot he was Canadian lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 04:12 PM
1

Oh yeah, forgot he was Canadian lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 04:12 PM
8

Of course I do. Jordan Peterson is already a borderline household name and bestselling author. He is generally well liked by quite a few conservatives. I could totally see the Republicans letting him on their ticket if he wanted to be on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 02:45 PM
11

Jordan Peterson could and probably would win the presidency if he ran, regardless of what party he ran for. Regardless of what some think of him, he's well read, well spoken, tall (yes, it matters), male, white, and would absolutely be able to get people to the polls.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 01:22 PM
0

Lol. How am I making things harder?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 12:46 AM
0

Harder =/= better. Harder =/= more fulfilling. Harder =/= more mature. Harder =/= more masculine. Harder just means harder. You seem to be under the false idea that anyone is thinking about or admiring you. That's what we call narcissism. The only person's life in which you are a main character is your own. There are a handful of people who have you cast as a supporting character, a bunch in which you're just an extra with a line or two of dialogue, and in the rest you're just a nameless, facele…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 12:44 AM
1

Lol. Why do you care about being admired? Why do you care about legacy? Who gives a rat's ass? Unless you go down in the history books, no one is going to remember your name in a hundred years. Provide for you and yours. Everyone else can go kick rocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 12:30 AM
1

Lol. First of all, the only people that I care about being proud of me are my parents, and they are very proud. Their youngest son busted his ass off and went to an Ivy League school and got a great job. They don't give two shits if I contribute to society at large. And I've already said that I do shit for my family and friends. I've almost completely bankrolled my mother's cancer treatment. But I didn't do it out of some need to "Be a Man!" or because it's what people expect. I did it, and cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 12:16 AM
2

No one man ever "built" anything? That's patently false. And my friends and family want me around, and really, those are the only people who's opinions really matter. My Ivy League education was a result of my hard work; my parents were lower middle class lol. So were 90% of my graduating class. Very few people at Ivy Leagues get in off of "daddy's money." See, what you don't understand, Meathead, is that those of us who aren't tall or muscular or conventionally attractive have to work exception…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 11:44 PM
2

"Grow up?" Into what? See, I don't owe anyone anything. Society doesn't give two shits about me, or the vast majority of men. Want proof? Look at Ukraine. All men from 18-60 were deemed expendable enough to be drafted and coerced into fighting a war against Russia. Women were valuable enough to be allowed to live and survive, men were deemed canon fodder to be thrown into the meat grinder. The US did the same thing in WWI, WWII, and Vietnam. Sacrificing my own wants and happiness for a society t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 11:03 PM
3

See, but that's where we disagree. You think being a "man" means doing the things that you listed. In my opinion, being a "man" is doing whatever the fuck I want to, without caring what other people think. When I want to go to the gym (usually 2-3 times a week), I go. When I don't, I don't. If I want to spend my money on Magic the Gathering, video games, guitars and golf clubs, I do. When you can honestly just not care if some chick doesn't approve of your hobbies or how you spend your free time…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 09:33 PM
1

Yeah, well, the reward isn't worth the effort. In fact, there often isn't a reward at all, especially if you're average looking and/or short. And, honestly, why would I put in all that work for something she's given dozens of other men for free? If there was a guaranteed pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, more men would do it. But, these days, the "reward" is often either fool's gold or missing altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 08:11 PM
5

No, I read it. You basically said that you need "strong social skills, make money, be a producer instead of a consumer, spend years in the gym, become a leader in all aspects of your life, etc, etc etc." Funny how women and tall, good looking men have to do none of these things, but we, as men, are expected to do all these things and more to even get a sniff of sex. And at the end of the day, she'll probably still just cheat with the tall, attractive guy anyways. She'll still always consider you…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 08:02 PM
2

Thank you for proving the point. "Dude, if you want to get laid, just be great at everything and spend years becoming worthy! Buy people stuff and change your entire personality! And it still might not work rofl!' Lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:55 PM
1

That's what I do. First yellow flag? I'm gone
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 10:18 PM
1

Lol. No, you're pretending like having a slightly smaller dating pool is as bad as being rejected by 80+% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 03:53 AM
1

Wow, those are some nice strawmen you got there. First of all, I never said that it can't get any worse than being short. I said it sucked, and that it sucks worse than being a tall woman. I provided reasons for those claims, and you just basically said, "NUH UH! Go gEt DaNgErOUs SuRgERY!!!!!! WOmEn DO ITTT!!!!" I explained why it was a dangerous procedure, and you just wrote it off. Look, you're obviously just a raging man-hating misandrist who doesn't want to admit that any man has it worse th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 03:24 AM
2

A nose job also breaks bone from your nose or extracts bones from parts of your body to add to your nose. Even jaw surgeries break your jaw bone. When's the last time you walked with your nose? Yes, some people it works alright. Most end up with lifelong side effects. Some are crippled. Does that sound like a good risk/reward? BBL’s have the highest mortality rates out of any cosmetic surgery… women are still willing to accept the risks in pursuit of becoming physically desirable unlike men. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 02:35 AM
1

Yeah, this isn't a BBL or a nose job. This is repeatedly breaking and separating the bones of either your arms or legs. You may not know this, but bones don't heal back as strong as they were before. Furthermore, this often causes permanent muscle, nerve and tissue damage, hampering the ability to walk, run, or lift things. The doctors try to mitigate these as much as possible, but there are serious side effects after pretty much every limb lengthening surgery, and they are mostly permanent. I g…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 01:33 AM
0

When you say they don’t have a problem finding men what do you mean? They don’t have problem dating, sleeping with any random man or they don’t have problems with finding a man to commit and marry them? All of the above. The same way ‘short’ men feel is the same way tall women feel when guys don’t prefer our height LMAO no. Just... no. Tall women have it so much easier than short men, it's not funny. Short men are discriminated against in pretty much every facet of their lives, from work and inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 12:02 AM
2

Lol. He only needs to be well above average in only one area? How magnanimous of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 11:41 PM
0

Yes, because refusing to ignore red flags is "insecure and controlling." I'm not telling her what to do, just responding to her actions. If she wants to do shady things and act single, then I'm under no obligation to stick around. That's the opposite of controlling. And it has nothing to do with my own self image, so it's not "insecure," either. Seriously, you ladies need to get some new buzzwords. The old ones have lost their bite, and you use them so much that they've lost all meaning at this …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 01:41 PM
3

Of course it doesn't mean she's cheating, but it is a sign. Why stick around to find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 07:06 PM
1

There's a difference between girls night out and girls night in, and you know it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:45 PM
2

I didn't have a tantrum lol. I didn't tell, or shout, or throw things. I packed my shit and left. And she was more than welcome to leave on a girls night whenever she wanted. It's the not coming back that was the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:36 PM
6

Lol. Go read Relationship Advice, and you'll see that your gf/wife suddenly developing a close relationship with a male coworker is a red flag. One of the most common people for a woman to cheat with is, in fact, a coworker. And I've gone on plenty of nights out. If I have a gf, I go out of my way to get back to her bc I'm probably horny af lol. And sure, she may have actually ended up at a friend's place. She'd never done that before, but it's possible. Or she could have ended up at some other …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:34 PM
5

I wasn't mad. And I didn't need to know any details, and let's be honest, no matter what actually happened, she would have told me something innocent. It's not like she would have come home and told me all about getting her back blown out. In order to find out what really happened (if something DID happen), I'd have to go into full detective mode, and honestly, that's just not worth the effort. And I'm assuming that wasn't a trip to Cancun, Ibiza or Miami. In my first post, I specified "party ci…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:28 PM
8

No, but if she starts consistently talking about a male coworker a lot? That's a red flag. And going out isn't a red flag. Not coming back is. I'm not insecure. I have no problems with my self image. At most you could call me mistrustful.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:17 PM
1

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:13 PM
2

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:13 PM
3

Yup. Not dealing with red flags = insecure. Ffs. You people use this so often that the insult has lost all bite.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 06:10 PM
2

Look. Everyone knows what happens on girls' trips to Cancun. She isn't going there to work on her crochet skills. Everyone knows what "Sorry, I fell asleep" really means. No, she didn't fall asleep at 9pm Saturday until 11 am Sunday. Everything I pointed out are clear signs of cheating. Just because I'm not willing to be the guy who turns into freaking Batman trying to figure out what really happened, doesn't mean I'm the bad guy. And I do this no matter how long the relationship has gone on. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:55 PM
5

Because telling them that you aren't cool with something somehow equals "controlling" these days. Edit: Everyone knows what happens on girls trips, what "Sorry, I fell asleep" really means, etc. She knows she's acting shady. I shouldn't need to tell her not to act shady.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:36 PM
6

How so? I'm not telling her what she can or can't do. I don't even tell her that I'd be uncomfortable if she went. She wants to go to Cancun for a week with her gal pals? No skin off my back. I'll drop her off at the airport and wish her a safe flight, then pull out my phone and block her. Actions have consequences. If she's going to act single, she can be single. I refuse to be the guy sitting at home wondering. If I have to wonder if she's cheating, then I just assume that she is and act accor…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:24 PM
13

Everyone just needs to chill out. Stop looking for "the one." They don't exist, and "ride or die" women are a relic of the past. Go into every relationship knowing that it has an expiration date, dont get too attached, enjoy it while it lasts, and dip at the first sign of trouble. She starts talking a lot about a coworker or being shady with her phone? Dump her. She goes out for a girl night, but doesnt and the night back at your place? Dump her. She goes on a girls trip to a party city? Dump he…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:32 PM
2

I never said I didnt lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:22 PM
2

Wow. This is wild. I'm not sure if she's delusional, wilfully ignorant, or naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:22 PM
2

Because people are selfish. Narcissism is so common, it was removed from the DSMV
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:43 PM
5

It's not about trust. Dressing in a skimpy outfit and going to a frat party isn't going to make her cheat (though it may give her an opportunity she may otherwise have ignored, or not have had altogether). It's about respect. Frat parties have a well earned reputation for debauchery. If your girlfriend is going to get drunk and cheat on you in college, it's probably going to be at a frat party. That's because the frat brothers have intentionally set it up that way. They allow pretty girls in, no…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:42 PM
2

And it wasn't any better. Just exploitative and demeaning, usually towards young women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:47 PM
3

Then she should break up with him, not lead him on, embarrass and emasculate him. If she wants to do single stuff, she should be single. Furthermore, how is telling the guy that he's "toxic and controlling" help anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:45 PM
3

I disagree. I think that the woman is generally given preference/benefit of the doubt unless it's something like, "My gf went to dinner and movie, then slept over at her ex's place. What do I do????"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:47 PM
4

See, your examples are controlling, and are completely unreasonable. Asking your gf to not go to frat parties dressed like a stripper is not lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:44 PM
1

Agreed 100% Even after the relationship goes exclusive, you can't fall too hard, too fast, or else you're going to chase them off and risk getting hurt. You constantly have to play the, "I am less invested than you are" game, or else she's going to lose attraction for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:19 PM
1

Not only that, but they are setting themselves up for failure. If a guy invests all of his energy into this one girl, while she has multiple balls in the air, then he's going to get too invested, too quickly, and chase her off. Until she says she's exclusive with you, you HAVE to continue acting like you're single, or you're going to come down with a bad case of oneitis
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:12 PM
1

And, even if she's currently celibate, you know that she's at least talking to somebody. You're never the only guy she's talking to, unless you're exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:04 PM
4

Okay. So a guy going to an exclusive party filled with drunk, horny girls that will be hitting and groping on him all night, in nothing but a jock strap, is perfectly acceptable? After all, going to parties is just a normal part of life, and wearing whatever you want is perfectly acceptable. And if his girlfriend asked him to put more clothes on before going off to hang out with a bunch of drunk, horny women... that's controlling and insecure. After all, if she was confident in what she brought …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:02 PM
5

Well, the boyfriend specifically said that several of the tops were "basically bra tops." I obviously haven't seen them, so I can only go off what he said. As for the parties... everyone knows what frat parties exist for. They open the doors for any attractive girl, but bar entrance to their boyfriends. They offer free booze to these girls. This is to get them alone and drunk enough to make bad decisions they may not otherwise have made sober/with their boyfriend. Honestly, this is why frats exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:51 PM
1

I could see that. I do subscribe to the notion that attractive women are never "single," though. At least, not in the way an average man is single.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:51 PM
5

Exactly. Okay for me, but not for thee. My theory is that the vast majority of the women commenting are 30+, have never been that attractive, and are living vicariously through the stories of others. They never had the figure to go to frat parties in lingerie, even though they wanted to, so the idea of a man telling his gf that he doesn't want her to do that is offensive. Or maybe were hot enough, but their bf at the time had a boundary against it, so they abstained... and now they regret not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:49 PM
4

No, it's not "controlling." It's setting boundaries for what you consider acceptable behavior in a relationship. So, if I wanted to go out on "platonic" sleepovers with my exes/fwb, and my gf said that she wasn't comfortable with that... would she be controlling? How about if she didn't want me to go to strip clubs? After all, she's trying to influence what I do. Hell, by that logic, expecting someone to not cheat on you is "controlling." There's a line between boundaries and controlling, yet wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:13 PM
9

Here's an example. Boyfriend is uncomfortable with his gf going to clubs and FRAT PARTIES dressed in extremely revealing outfits, some of which amount to basically lingerie. The entire comment section is just a bunch of women calling him controlling and insecure. https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/q4l911/is_it_controlling_for_me_to_not_want_my/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Meanwhile, in the real world, a lot of college guys have a "No Frat Parties Period" boundary. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:52 PM
3

Well, they say to have boundaries, but every post that includes a man with boundaries is filled with replies calling him controlling.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:45 PM
6

Not talking about the stories. I'm talking about the replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:28 PM
1

I'm going to call BS. No, in her ideal world, the attractive guy would have the option and ability to sleep with other women, but he chooses not to because he's so over the moon crazy about her. She wants Stacie, Kacie, and Lacey to be throwing themselves at him, but he doesnt even notice because he only has eyes for her. Even though she's not having sex with him Even though she's boinking Brad on the side. To her, it's not hypocritical, because "it's just sex, there's no feelings involved. It d…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:10 PM
4

R/relationshipadvice
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:04 PM
9

My biggest problem with this is that she's making Nathan wait WHILE having sex with Ben. But I guarantee you, if she found out he was boinking Stacy while they were in the pre-exclusive stage, she would be hurt and upset. Edit: That being said, this is obviously a LARP. No woman would admit to doing this with the guy she was currently seeing, because she's basically admitting that she was boinking another guy while you were dating, but not yet exclusive. And, guys, this is why you don't be exclu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:54 AM
16

Exactly. And don't forget, having any boundaries whatsoever is controlling. Don't want her having dinner and sleepovers with her ex? Controlling and insecure! Don't want her to go out every weekend and get wasted with her friends showing off way more skin than she covers? Controlling and insecure!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:22 AM
6

Chad Genetics: 7 (+6) Maintained: 5 (+4) Social Skills: 5 (+4) Net Worth: 10 (+9) Logistics: 1 (+0) A handsome 6'0" guy with a dad bod, average social skills and millions in the bank, despite having a stem career with zero women. I'd clean the eff up. Seeking Arrangements, anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:55 AM
10

Every woman wants the alpha who also will provide and be a good husband/provider. Literally every single one. But those guys don't do that. They don't have to. They have a million women like you who are more than willing to hop on their Johnson in the hopes that a relationship will ensue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 03:37 AM
8

It's not quite THAT bad. You're allowed to be a happy and stoic. Nothing in between.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 03:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter