TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Azureheart Archive

View 1 posts and 19 comments by Azureheart on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
79

Azureheart/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
34

Emotionally, yeah. Most of the time, the women aren't getting financially torn to shreds, though. In that sense, it's tougher for men.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:12 AM
1

Because females are sexist chauvinist bigots I agree. Like, look at that. Is this what Men's Rights represents or what we're combating? Christ.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:36 AM
1

Right, but this particular thread requested male countries, even though the individual commenting with India made a mistake, and no one implied women don't suffer or have shit all for rights either. This is what I cannot stand. Gender issues are not a competition and it's frivolous to transform it into that. Women suffer there, quite blatantly and obviously, but as do men, particularly gay men, men without religion, etc.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:39 PM
6

You're right. This subreddit feels like it's always been into anti-feminism instead of a place to discuss and analyze issues relating to men's rights. People like "guywithaccount" are far too interested in making "anti-feminist" synonymous with "MRA" and it's so miserably damaging for this particular type of group/movement to primarily focus itself on almost solely rallying against another faction. It's why we aren't gaining proper traction and why we cannot civilly communicate or build anything…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:15 PM
7

I suppose because it's not precisely about how much damage can be caused. I think that's a distraction from the genuine complexities of physical abuse. For example, one might say that it's a massive deal when a man where to, say, grope a female's breast, touch her ass, etc., ALL without causing or ever being able to cause significant harm. We consider this molestation, and maybe in even rape cases where there isn't physical violence involved, a serious issue. It is the same here. This is a woman…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:57 PM
6

Then that's your minority and your majority. It's anecdotal. For me, I've had the opposite with the majority of feminists I've encountered who disregard prejudice and hatred against white people, straight people, etc. Also, the majority I've encountered seem only focused toward helping Caucasian women in western/developed society achieve equality. Now, I don't go about saying it's THE majority without any sort of statistical evidence. That wouldn't be fair. Perhaps you meant to express yourself …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:24 PM
1

This isn't going to be productive And... Yours is shit. Being hypocritical when criticizing someone can be damaging to what you're attempting to get across. You were right but take it easy.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 10:41 PM
1

Remember, men need to be taught not to rape. God, you guys suck at this!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:52 AM
12

THIS is part of the reason why rape stats are not reflective of what actually occurs. Males have been conditioned to think that a woman raping them is "awesome" or that it's something that is cool OR that when a woman does it, it's "not really rape." If not for those reasons, you still cannot win. You can't go report it because it's "unmanly." Don't want anyone knowing that you were overpowered and had your rights violated by a woman because you're a hearty and tough MAN, right? Jesus, women say…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:32 AM
1

"Job" isn't being used literally.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:27 AM
5

I agree with you. There's a bit of a double standard going on. This sub hates it when women are afraid of men in general because females are raped by men but it's completely acceptable and just for him to afraid of women in general because false allegations happen? Absurd, to me.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:08 AM
1

Whoops, that was a typo. I meant slaves. You're assuming these owners only had one source of income, which is the slaves. The labor that slaves performed didn't pay much anyway and, even then, a lot of slave owners were mid-high to high class and were earning capital via separate avenues than slavery.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:34 PM
2

The slaves earend the money, the masters kept it. This largely depends on what kind of slave work you're discussing. Even then, slavers didn't earn more because they didn't get shit. A part of earning is what you take.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:31 PM
1

I'm lucky that you asked for information after saying something grossly incorrect? You took that "fact" without information. Also, how does it make me lucky that you decided to recant your idiocy? Oh, wow. I should go buy a lottery ticket. Jesus Christ, what narcissism. EDIT: Wow, thanks for Gold!
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:57 PM
1

In many societies slaves earned more money than their masters What the fuck.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:36 PM
1

No, it's not. You're expecting him to teach you, as opposed to finding the research materials for yourself. How is this not dependent? I'm not saying it's bad all of the time but you're sitting here like, "Teach me." Stop being lazy. "Guys, I AM tying my own shoes by asking someone else to tie them!"
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:24 PM
2

Why is this everyone else's responsibility, though? You should be self-educating, not expecting everyone else to lob information at you.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:13 PM
1

^ That.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:22 PM
9

Great post. Thanks for contributing!
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter