TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BALROGG Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by BALROGG on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I know kids shriek for the silliest things. To me this is different and even if I were to give you the benefit of the doubt there are too many ethical dilemmas for me to think it's right.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:30 AM
2

I'm glad there were no complications with your son, but that's just one case out of a million. I've done my research on the topic and have seen cases which were the opposite of your boy's, so there's no need to make an ass of yourself.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:25 PM
2

Even with anaesthesia infants will scream bloody murder from the damage that's being done.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 09:54 PM
4

Needle? Are you describing a vaccine? Every circumcision video I've seen shows the child belting out blood curtling screams.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:30 PM
14

Circumcision isn't any more painful than a vaccine I challenge you to watch an infant circumcision and make that claim.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:49 PM
1

You believe murder is wrong? Congratulations, you're a Christian!
/r/MensRights15/04/16 04:41 PM
3

Not exactly a valid reason to give such a blanket statement.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:59 PM
2

Sure, you own your kid until they are 18, but once an adult they have long lost the agency for that part of their body Jonathan tries to reason with these religious traditionalists by asking if we should accept a religion's ritual of cutting off hands. A better way to send the message would be using a toe or digit.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:57 PM
1

The gap in escalation of violence is astounding. Beating someone all the time is truly deplorable, but mutilating someone is definitely a whole 'nother ball park
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:08 PM
11

Fighting the bullshit narrative is exhausting.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:26 AM
8

I like bacon, cheese, and sour cream with my loaded questions.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:48 PM
1

Exactly, but if it wasn't life or death it would be considered a con...
/r/MensRights10/01/16 07:32 AM
3

Cons of Circumcision It is not a life-or-death procedure wtf
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:31 PM
5

The main character broke his legs to become taller...
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:02 PM
8

People can change their height, just watch Gattaca.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:20 PM
2

If Gloria Steinem wants to glorify powerful women why doesn't she focus on Jill Stein? That woman actually shows strength and intelligence. My guess is it's because the media rarely if ever gives a platform to 3rd parties.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:45 PM
3

The question is why do female sports bring in less money? Answer, patriarch. Edit: I'm being facetious.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:41 PM
3

Shoot the message, not the messenger.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:54 PM
1

Those that want to vote based on gender act like Hillary is the only choice. If a woman is going to win in 2016 lets hope it's Jill Stein as she is a way better candidate than Hillary.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:23 PM
2

That's chavelah's point.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 11:18 PM
-4

Yes, because this type of thinking applies to all women. /s
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:17 PM
12

The dangers spawn from what a single accusation can do.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:13 PM
9

Tell me something new.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:52 PM
3

My advice, make the best of what you've got and do your part to ensure others have a chance for more. Taking legal action will raise awareness but can be costly in more ways than monetary. Speaking up though is free and easy when the defense for this subject is paper thin. Do what you can to talk to friends, write letters to those in power, and show support when needed. This may not be the compensation you're looking for but your efforts make a world of difference.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:50 PM
1

Anytime! If only more people were like you in that they don't go apeshit at opposing facts.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:29 PM
1

The reason for the increased rate of UTIs in studies I assume you are referring to is due to ill informed doctors whom told the parents of the uncircumcised boys to peel back the foreskin and wash with mild soap and water. Any trained professional should know that in the early stages of life the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis. By pulling back the foreskin, parents are tearing the skin of the penis and further irritating it with soap essentially causing the UTIs. The right way to clea…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:52 PM
2

I completely agree, I just find it easier to debunk the stats
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:50 PM
1

Excellent point but in my experience most refuse it as not everyone is educated enough to gain access and use them, so they see it as a fail-safe.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:59 PM
8

They didn't conclude the study before they were sexually active. It takes six weeks to heal from the procedure, one month before everyone was called in for the three month marker. This also assumes one can only contract HIV with sexual intercourse, which may be more likely but not every case.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:20 PM
23

This study was awfully done. The timer was started after the circumcision was performed but before the circumcised group could be sexually active due to healing. Those circumcised went to the clinic more frequently because of complications. Anytime someone visited the clinic they had to sit through a short sex ed course and were given condoms. It says the study was ended for ethical reasons but that skews the data as more than 700 participants would never follow up in whether or not they receive…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:58 PM
1

Sure bro
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:03 PM
1

I understand the logic to it, but even if one grenade was active I wouldn't play, luckily I don't believe the world works this way exactly. This video explains how I feel about this argument on the other side of the coin.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:55 PM
1

I have already addressed and agreed with you on the legal standpoint. Sure, not all women would, but ALL WOMEN CAN. It is not the lkkelihood, but the possibility that matters. The people who use the m&m's analogy think the exact same way when it comes to abuse. I use them not as a strawman but as an example to see from a different point of view. Also likelihood and possibility are in each others definitions, do you mind clarifying? I'm not a troll, I am just someone with slightly different views…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:54 PM
1

No one thinking rational would accept that risk. I feel like you are ignoring my poison m&m's argument, which is rational but not a good light to see things in as it is not case by case. Edit: You also say not all women while labeling the good ones are "unicorns" as if rare to nonexistent, don't you see the parody of this?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:23 PM
1

No one is denying the legal system is stacked against men, thats why the majority of us are here, but to assume all women would do this given the chance is similar to those that don't date men for fear of rape. Every person is a case by case scenario and should be given that respect.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:55 PM
0

I understand the risk is there but I see many MGTOW closing the door and painting all under one brush which is not a healthy way to deal with any kind of trauma/fear. There are good people out there who don't pull these legal shenanigans, one just has to stumble across them. Now if you just enjoy the single life all power to you. Edit: added /fear to trauma
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:44 PM
4

Girls have a tuff time in math and science? Give them well deserved special programs. Boys have a tuff time in reading and language? Give them a title of being troublesome and broken.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:59 PM
6

They really went out of their way to formally write an incorrect definition. When you head over to misogyny it simply says "The hatred of women" where as misandry includes oppression and "reasons" it's not real... sigh Well at least it's not a real dictionary.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:18 PM
1

Not sure if you are joking...
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:39 PM
1

Unless they're getting another 4 years of college in Psychology. Even at that amount of education they shouldn't diagnose anyone.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:36 PM
4

"We're not all like that." Rather than, "I'm sorry" And someone who is not guilty shouldn't have to apologize on behalf of someone who is. I don't think she means it as an apology but rather a sign of empathy, such as "I'm sorry for the death of your relative."
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:11 PM
0

In no way does this song down play men and what price they pay. There is no reason to be offend by this, we all make sacrifices, she is just highlighting her experience of being strong through it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:13 PM
1

Just because an article is encyclopedic & has lots of citations doesn't make it notable. I've seen walls of junk citations from feminist writen pages. Shouldn't they be questioned on notability?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:01 PM
1

I understand you believe the ratio should be closer to even but the problem is that is the ratio is what it is because of voters and interests in that job field between the two genders. Because otherwise, you end up with men trying to pass laws to outlaw abortion and even birth control pills The people that do this represent the those that vote for them, these voters could be male or female, otherwise they would lose support. P.s. "I've never thought about why a woman would want to get an aborti…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:07 PM
2

So another gender or race can represent me but not accurately? Just because superficial differences aren't balanced? Which is something they can't control. As far your question goes. It would not matter so long as I feel as though they represent my beliefs. I have often voted for the opposite gender based on what they stood for.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:53 AM
9

Under 20% of Congress members are women, and for state elected officials the average is around 23%. It shouldn't be that low when women are over half of the population. The problem with your argument is that it assumes in order for someone to represent my beliefs they must share my gender. This quote alone proves that this is not the case.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:53 AM
8

My daughter my decision. If I want to clip clits, I should be able to clip clits!
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:54 PM
1

Great point at the end @26:54 "If you're really concerned about rights it's not about women's rights, it's about individual rights. You never want to talk about rights in terms of a group whether it's gay rights, or you know Hispanic rights, or disabled, or older people whatever it is. No, you don't have a special right because of a class or a subset that you happen to exist in, that's all about privileges and we're not a nation of privileges, we eliminated privileges. That's like royalty where …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:58 PM
84

I don't know how they get away with this because last time I checked "affects 1 in 3 women" isn't the same as 1 in 3 people with heart disease is a woman. edit: I stand corrected in this case they are roughly the same. Still seems odd that this has become a gender issue.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:53 PM
2

So tipping a server 22% less just because she is a woman makes total sense, right?
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:17 PM
1

Thats what the save button is for.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:41 PM
8

It's been shown that traumatic events during the neonatal stage can have lasting effects on the brain.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:58 PM
1

Please explain.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:35 PM
1

Please explain.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:24 AM
1

As long as you don't mind being labeled a sex offender.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:09 AM
1

Wut.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:04 AM
10

Being a woman despite what you think isn't a reason. Except that isn't the reason at all. If Anita was a man cough Jack Thompson cough she would still face the criticism she recieves. To have criticism you actually have to do something wrong. Considering she has shamed, misrepresented and generalized an entire group whose main interest is just having fun, I'd say she's doing something wrong.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:03 PM
2

Every time someone claims this I think of this.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:53 PM
1

I'd sure like to find one.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:06 PM
1

Thats not even my main point. You treating women with a different standard is not helping society hold them to an equal standard.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 05:40 PM
1

Dude. You are derailing so hard right now... I can see you're not even listening to my points.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:28 AM
0

I think I got that. But as I said before that is irrational response which is really only hurting yourself.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:07 AM
0

every bank that wont give a bankruptcy person a loan. Thats because they can tie that person's bankruptcy with their actions. Any random woman's actions aren't nessicarilly the cause to the problems in our society, so why blame them all or even the majority? Do you disagree with "Women are held to a different standard. Nearly none."? As a whole I think they are held to a different standard, but every person makes their own standards of themselves and others. To say they have close to no standard…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:35 AM
0

Yes my actions are bases on the predictable actions of others. Predictable actions are just that, predictions, and you acting on them is just going to make you a cynical bat-turd. Let me be clear though, it is ok for you to take caution, but if you go into it like a bigot how do you think others will react to you? No. Thats not even a valid response Do you disagree with my statements or just not like them? Why not both?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 12:15 AM
4

Where have I said I don't want you protecting yourself? Treating people based off class an not personal actions is just bigotry. Respect is earned. No shit thats why I stated EVERY INDIVIDUAL should be rated with a level of respect based on their actions . Judges, police officers and the law treats them as a different class. It's not my choice. So other people's actions excuses your own? It is your choice, and this choice you've made isn't doing any good.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:24 PM
4

Make men and women equals and ill start treating them like equals. "Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one." Just because there are inequalities in the world does not mean you should make it worse by treating women with less respect than anyone else. Many women are not represented by toxic groups in the world so why group them together?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:32 AM
14

If society will not hold them accountable I will treat them like children. This is inappropriate response. EVERY INDIVIDUAL should be rated with a level of respect based on their actions, and not be judged based on societal views of a group.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter