TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BBQ_HaX0r Archive

View 0 posts and 91 comments by BBQ_HaX0r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Imagine what? Hypothetical public outcry? It's not wrong in either situation and anyone freaking out over either situation is an idiot. You trying to drum up outrage in your hypothetical is doing the same shit you're complaining about people doing. Who cares what other people do?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:06 PM
0

Right? I often get downvoted here, so what does that mean for someone like me? lol
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:42 PM
1

How does that disagree or conflict with anything I've said, lol?
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:12 AM
1

And your point? People have different opinions to all these terms. You, I, and everyone else can disagree to what constitutes "creepy." an unwanted advance isn't creepy by itself. I don't disagree with that, but it could be creepy and being told you're being creepy helps establish these boundaries. Saying "don't call people creepy" is as dumb as saying "don't flirt with anyone."
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:38 AM
1

Who determines anything? Some people prefer cucumbers better pickled. It's all part of the socialization process. Being told "you're being creepy" is part of it. But to directly answer your question... yes, they do have the authority to determine it. It's completely subjective and varies from person to person.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:24 AM
2

Isn't being called "creepy" helping establish acceptable standards for establishing successful/unsuccessful attempts? Like if you come off as creepy or whatever shouldn't you be called on it so you know what not to do next time? Isn't that how you learn what is and isn't acceptable?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:38 PM
2

But service guarantees citizenship!
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:05 PM
-2

If you don't think that men are equally as capable of making short-sighted stupid decisions then I don't how to help you. If this sub wants to truly promote Men's Rights then it should above denigrating women and implying they're inferior. I'm certainly not leftist nor am I one to decry everything as sexism, but that comment is blatantly ignorant and sexist and if you don't see that then that speaks to you. He doesn't posit any examination other than his own, likely prejudiced, experiences. It's…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:58 PM
-7

No, it was definitely a sexist comment and comes from your prejudiced view. Your declaration before the statement doesn't change what it was. If you don't think men are equally incapable of thinking about the ramifications of their actions then the fault lay with the observer. You can pretend it's a strawman or I'm overreacting and get all defensive, but that comment was definitely sexist. Now you can downvote me and insult me or assume I'm some SJW troll, or you can consider why "most women" yo…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:43 PM
-2

Right because only women are incapable about thinking about the consequences of their decisions. There's a reason humans smoke, overeat, take risks, destroy the environment, and partake in all sorts of decisions that may have long-term effects. People often sacrifice long-term well being for short-term satisfaction. But let's generalize and ascribe these traits only to women? Like I try hard to fight against the stigma that all MRAs are sexist and then you see something like this upvoted and so …
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:12 PM
4

Luke Skywalker single-handedly makes me want to cheer for the Empire.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:15 PM
5

Maybe you shouldn't rush into marriage then. It's almost like there is this thing called dating where you can see what type of person you're getting into a relationship with.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:22 PM
1

What damages though? Like are you just saying "he'd get sued" or in Australia can you legitimately sue over a bad haircut. Because these are two distinct issues.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 03:36 AM
14

If you're that scared of your government you may not want to post these feelings publicly online.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:08 PM
14

This is exactly what the feminists do that this very sub mocks. They ascribe deep meaning to something stupid and simple. If you reversed them and someone said it was sexist against women the same people upvoting this would tell them to 'quit being ridiculous.' So, everyone here needs to quit being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:35 PM
2

It's not about eating the cake you have. Obviously you 'have' it if you're eating it so the expression seemingly makes no sense. It should be rephrased to something like: "Eat your cake now and have it later too." It's basically saying you can't eat your cake now and still have it later to eat as well.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:32 PM
19

Or record phone/in-person conversations. But the point remains, keep a record.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:05 PM
6

This is fascinating. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:00 PM
-1

This isn't a wise solution.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:51 PM
23

Liberal hivemind here?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:57 PM
2

What about the glorified Star courts that are the FISA courts? Do those judges count? Never give too much authority to the State. It will only result in the oppression of the individual.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 04:22 PM
3

Gee, I wonder why this sub gets labelled as sexist.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:35 PM
33

Right? If this is where the issues in gender equality are we're clearly in a fairly good place.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:14 PM
0

crazy?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:49 PM
0

What if she makes more than you?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 04:25 PM
10

I mean this ridiculous. It highlights so many issues with leaving this serious of an issue in the hands of untrained, ill-equipped, and often times unprofessional bureaucrats and administrators. Accusations of sexual or physical violence should be left in the hands of those with the training and authority to do something about it. Law Enforcement and the Criminal Court system. I chose to not get the law involved How nice of this woman. You mean her fabrications couldn't make her liable for makin…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:06 PM
5

She's supposedly being suspended for 'past incidents' as well. Now that it doesn't matter and her team isn't playing in any major competitions. Though I'd be very shocked if she ever plays again for the WNT. She's threatening legal action saying she was a victim of sexism and had her 1st Amendment rights violated.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 01:31 PM
1

Gotta stop reading Kafka before bed!
/r/MensRights24/08/16 10:47 PM
1

That's clearly what I said! Another fine example of why teachers are so important.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 02:39 AM
2

I'm being downvoted for telling men to get into teaching and not be afraid of accusations. For saying that young men and women need male role-models and teachers. The fear of being accused should not be a detriment to get into teaching. Do people need to be aware of it, certainly, we all are. However, people flat out telling other men NOT to get into teaching is fear-mongering. Those using insults and accusations towards me way are the ones 'acting like feminists.' I have little doubt those same…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 09:15 PM
-2

sabotaging the future of young men naive enough to believe you. Wow. That's scary. Stop the fear mongering. Horseshoe-theory indeed.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:19 PM
4

I am a teacher. So fuck off with this god damn nonsense. It's a rewarding experience and all you fucking clowns fear-mongering men from joining should fuck right off. Kids need good teachers. Kids need role-models. And there are not enough good male role-models in our schools. So fuck you. Don't presume to know me. edit: You want to know what boys need most. Strong male examples in their lives. They need someone to look up to. Many do not have fathers. Many do not get male teachers. I'm there ev…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:00 PM
-4

You're the one making assumptions and then insulting me based off those assumptions. I gave my opinions. Accept them or don't. Take your shit elsewhere.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:34 PM
-8

How do you know I'm not?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:29 PM
-10

How can I disprove his opinion? I disagreed with it. He has his own experiences and beliefs that impact that decision. I cannot disprove that. I can merely state my own. I believe this is fear-mongering, no different to feminists who whine that STEM careers are 'too hard' or 'biased toward men' and deter women from entering those careers. The education system needs better teachers, and especially male teachers. That's my opinion. I do not believe the system is inherently prejudiced against men t…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:11 PM
-8

Don't listen to this guy. Get into teaching. Young boys and girls need good positive male role-models. They need different perspectives and opinions in the classroom and out of it. And most importantly they need good educators.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:58 PM
4

Many tribes are split on the issue. I've been told flat out by many Iroquois that they prefer Indian to NA. Both terms are acceptable in society.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:29 PM
10

not to circlejerk about how we're so obviously correct. Isn't that what he is doing? He is being downvoting for boasting about how magnanimous he is and willing to serve prison time for the greater good. That sort of shit isn't an argument, it's some adolescent fantasy. It serves no purpose and certainly isn't a start to a dicussion. And any society that punishes innocent civilians 'for the greater good' is not civilized nor worthy of praise. Standards of fairness, equality, and due process are …
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:47 PM
-11

Stop it.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:32 PM
103

If rape is a serious crime, as these Universities proclaim and many of us believe, then we ought to treat rape allegations seriously. To do that we should allow the criminal justice system, which is designed specifically to determine guilt and handle evidence, to handle these and not leave it in the hands of a bunch of untrained college bureaucrats.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:04 PM
22

Public sector unions are blights on this country whether they lean left (teacher's) or right (police). They wield too much political power, protect interests counter to the public's interest, are extremely costly, and enable and protect bad public servants and policies.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 09:56 PM
2

Terrible advice. Talk to a lawyer first! The cops are not your friend!
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:50 PM
2

VICE's show on HBO where they focused on 'rape on campus' was completely biased and dishonest. They took the same facts and somehow turned them in their favor (kangaroo courts, unqualified administrators) without ever mentioning that men can be victims of these same procedures. Their casual dismissal of police and the American legal system was bogus as well. Simply a 'well the high standards of proof required here often doesn't give victims a place to turn.' It was absolutely disgusting. I love …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:30 PM
5

Hard truths cut both ways.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:15 PM
4

If we change the definition of 'sexual assault' to include unwanted looks and comments then you're gonna get a crazy statistic. I'm surprised it's not more like 1 in 1 with how it's been watered down.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:55 PM
7

Wow, I didn't know he was still around. That's the same old Maddox I remember, spewing truth and stompin' balls.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 02:06 PM
206

Wow, do people not realize who Christina Hoff Sommers is? She's one of the best voices out there advocating for true equality and cutting through a lot of the nonsense. She would be considered one of the founders of Men's Rights, if that's such a thing. She is an acclaimed scholar and currently produces some of the best content on the subject and people here are going to demean her for where she goes to produce content or where she was employed. Judge her by her content, it speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:29 PM
8

Just a reminder that Kirsten Gillibrand was appointed by an un-elected Governor to her seat in the Senate. She has since won elections on her own, but considering that low rate of incumbent defeats, that's not saying too much. It always seemed odd to me how she got her position.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:37 AM
2

"I'll own... as soon as..." So you believe it's wrong that the right doesn't "own" the crazies in their group, yet you refuse to acknowledge the crazies in your group UNTIL they do. It's hypocritical. Hopefully it was just a figure of speech and not an actual belief.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:33 AM
4

What does it mean to "own" this sub-group within your own group? And if you find it wrong that the right ignores or refuses to "own" a subsection of their group why do you then do the same thing while knowing its wrong?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:18 PM
3

"Based on true events" is the most misleading phrase in publishing and media.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:13 AM
1

Censorship is stupid and often illogical. R'hllor bless the First Amendment.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:29 AM
5

This seems awfully anti-man rather than pro-woman.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:20 PM
0

Turncloaks!
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:25 PM
2

"The victims deserve justice. The men deserve due process." That's one of the best quotes I've heard on the subject.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:55 PM
2

The Ray McDonald case is interesting and has been talked about quite frequently by the media and fans. I don't think you're accurate to say it hasn't been focused on, it's been a fairly large topic of discussion. It's been mentioned quite a bit, especially with regards to coach Harbaugh's "zero tolerance" stance. I listen to a lot of sports-talk radio and the ESPN Happy Hour Line-up (ATH and PTI) and both those places have talked about it quite a bit as well. Maybe not as much as Rice or AP, bot…
/r/PussyPass19/09/14 06:49 PM
3

I've been reading a lot of comments and hearing this story all day (on the radio, on the internet, social media) and I feel like I need somewhere to vent. Especially after seeing Mark Schwarz (google what he did with regards to Bernie Fine -- he shouldn't have a job as a journalist) reporting it on ESPN and then Ray Lewis making moral judgments about the situation on ESPN. I need to type up my thoughts and vent. Domestic violence is awful. The level of intimacy and trust involved in a relationsh…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:54 PM
8

opinions of her product have been tainted That happens in all manners of industries. You're more likely to give favorable reviews to people you know and like. There just needs to be more transparency in admitting these relationships so the consumer can account for the bias (and certainly not quid quo pro arrangements). I honestly do not see the issue with indie devs bonding together to help each other succeed either. Journalists on the other hand, that's a problem as I believe them to have a res…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:47 PM
8

I kind of got wrapped up in this whole issue yesterday and spent good time discussing it with some smart friends of mine. I was somewhat surprised this didn't turn up here sooner. I think the issue OP highlights has more to do with political correctness particularly people taking advantage of situations with political correctness. People are so worried about 'offending someone' or being labeled something that is not true (sexist, racist, bigoted, et al.) which hampers discussion and speech. I th…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:40 PM
2

"Sir, i have never seen Michael's alleged penis, but I bet you that i could describe it, all right? Let me guess. There's a head, a shaft, some balls, hair -- maybe pressed, permed hair with glitter sprinkled on it."
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:58 PM
1

Relevant: P&T's Bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:50 PM
1

LoL Moritz Leitner shout-out. Unless I'm missing something, someone knows their soccer.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:52 PM
0

Step One: Eat healthier. Step Two: Workout. Step Three: go to /fit/
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:04 PM
32

"So many vows. They make you swear and swear. Defend the King, obey the King, obey your father, protect the innocent, defend the weak. But what if your father despises the King? What if the King massacres the innocent? It's too much. No matter what you do, you're forsaking one vow or another." ―Jaime Lannister
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:46 AM
101

Treat Rape as a Crime, not a Violation of Campus Rules. Seriously, this is why we have a criminal justice system, to take care of stuff like this. I have no idea why the University believes they ought to be in the business of having kangaroo courts with low burdens of proof, unfair or no representation, and Kafkaesque proceedings. It's astonishing. I would seriously recommend that this student contact FIRE, if he has not already done so, and they may be able to do something. Depending on the ins…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:16 AM
13

It's actually quite astonishing how backwards our University system is with regards to things like student rights. Check out TheFire.org, an organization designed to help protect and enforce student rights.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:11 AM
7

I first saw this story on ESPN. I believe Outside The Lines had a special on it?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 05:56 PM
9

So is it better to be a liar or incompetent? Shame that's what we're stuck with in politics these days.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:38 PM
85

"If women were actually paid 77% of what men make for the same job, no corporation would ever hire men." Saw that floating around Reddit somewhere so the credit is not mine, but dang what a response.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:36 PM
1

Well, I suppose you're correct(ish)? I'm talking literally. If your employer fires you for being a certain religion, you cannot claim they violated the Constitution in doing so as the Constitution does not protect you from private acts. However, we have loads of federal law and case law that stipulates you cannot. Constitution does not protect you from discrimination in the private sector, only public. Federal law protects you from (certain) discrimination in the private sector.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:04 PM
1

Not spamming, but relevant ... the guy from duck dynasty was fired for stating his personal beliefs. He cannot claim his 1st Amendment rights have been violated as A&E is a private actor.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:15 AM
1

No, you're incorrect again about SCOTUS. A private actor cannot violate the constitution, like ever. You cannot sue a private actor for violating your rights as they do not apply to private citizens. The constitution ONLY applies to the gov't and is, essentially a contract between the gov't and its citizens. If another citizen (or in this case University) violates another citizens rights, it is not a constitutional issue, even if it is against the law. Private actors often times infringe upon th…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:50 PM
1

No. You may be in violation of federal law though.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:23 PM
-1

Haha, okay. Source? Cite? Reasoning? You're wrong. I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be an asshole, but there is tons of misinformation going around. I get it, we're mad at what this University did, but in order to remedy the situation you at least have to understand what violation occurred.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:54 PM
-1

Incorrect. You are confusing federal law and the Constitution. The Civil Rights Act outlaws discrimination, which is the law they would be violating, NOT the Constitution. Do you see the difference? So you couldn't sue as a violation of your Constitutional rights, but rather that they are in violation of federal law. Just like in the case above, it is a violation of Title IX, NOT the Constitution. Federal law does not mean the Constitution. Federal Law applies to entities and citizens, the Const…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:45 PM
0

I'm talking about when Universities decide that they can handle the law better than the police and court systems. And when the standards that the workplace/university enact are inferior (lack of due process, no representation, burden of proof, evidence) and the punishment is often severe it's not in anyone's best interest.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:42 PM
0

We already discussed this a couple of posts ago. Universities have significant leeway when determining their means of due-process. This presents a University from arbitrarily dismissing a student. There has to be some procedure set in place. This might be particularly relevant when discussing this issue. Relevant from that for ease of search... "Public Universities, as an arm of the government, have to follow certain constitutionally required standards in setting rules and disciplining students.…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:20 AM
-1

Hey my private university states that I cannot have any possession of firearms on campus. I should sue for violating my 2nd Amendment rights.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:07 AM
-1

I hear personal insults are clutch in an argument you wrongly interjected yourself in.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:03 AM
0

I commented on a post about how this isn't a constitutional issue affirming that statement. YOU then decided to comment on a string of posts about constitutionality and are now upset I'm harping on about it? I acknowledge that a university is not exempt of all federal oversight, but one is not guaranteed constitutional rights at a private university! And I'm the fool? Comment 1) "... but this is not an issue of constitutional rights." - knowsaboutmath Comment 2) "... you're not protected by the …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:49 AM
1

As a student, there are certain rights granted to you by federal law at these universities. It doesn't matter what your contract with the university says if it is in violation of those laws. The university has agreed to follow those laws and their conduct must adhere to that. Correct. However federal law does not include the Constitution. A private university can institute policies that run afoul of the US Constitution. If my private university expels me without due process for some comment I ma…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:28 AM
1

I don't get it? Ok. Students at private universities are not protected by the Constitution. The University can enact policies which run afoul of the Constitution. It is known. You do not have a constitutional right to have an attorney present in a university matter. Fact. If you go to a private school you are not guaranteed the same due process protections and standards that a gov't courtroom provides (only one being bound by the constitution, ya dig?). Fact. Claiming that a university policy vi…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:13 AM
1

You be trollin, right?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:42 AM
1

He's entitled to be represented by an attorney because it's a case in federal court and removed from the university. Xavier does not have to allow him representation by an attorney in their affairs. The Xavier case is completely irrelevant to your argument, if you don't understand that, well, I'm wasting my time. I'm talking about the US Constitution and its applicability to students at a private university. Not breach of contract claim where a student claims that the university violated its dut…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:42 AM
1

I love the FIRE and have the greatest respect for their work. They are seriously some of the brightest and best people protecting students in this country. Everyone should be more informed about their work. Did you even read the cases? Do you know what you're saying or what I am saying? How are they related to constitutional protections of students at private schools? Dez Wells -- "... Tuesday in federal court alleging that Xavier failed to follow its own procedures in a sexual assault hearing a…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:20 AM
2

That is simply not true. Accepting federal money does not mean that they are bound to provide students with the same constitutional protections. What would be an illegal infringement of a student's 1st Amendment Rights at the State University would not be so at the Private University. It is known.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:17 AM
5

Occidental is private (at least accoring to my quick search).
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:14 AM
-2

Any accredited university you've ever heard of has agreed to a certain standard of behavior which basically guarantees fair treatment for all students. Yes, it's called a contract between student and the university. You would have to sue as a breach of contract, not a violation of your constitutional rights. Accepting federal money does not in any way change that. Schools can determine their own restrictions to speech, association, due process, expulsion, et al., even if they run afoul of the Co…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:11 AM
4

I tried explaining how you're not protected by the Constitution at a private university and was downvoted a bit for it as well. It's not that hard of a concept, truly. Yes, you cannot sign yourself into slavery, but you're not guaranteed free speech, a trial, due process, or the right to bear arms unless you've agreed to it in your contract with the private entity.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:59 PM
4

Rape should be a criminal matter. Universities should stay out of legal matters until they have been resolved properly.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:03 PM
15

Your rights are basically void if it is a private university. You have to abide by the contract that you and your University agree to. We're not talking criminal charges here before a court, but going before the University (not the gov't) and their way of dealing with misconduct. The problem is that many times the standard of proof and university procedure are so perverted that you can be found 'guilty' and kicked out of school or punished when in an actual courtroom there likely wouldn't even b…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter