| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 'Women only' train coach.I understand but bringing it back to the whole "women only" coaches. How does that affect you? Hm? It doesn't happen as often as it does for women. Just think about it. Women need safe places, and men need safe places too but when you look at the statistics women-only coaches aren't a big deal. It'll prevent people from being harrassed on both ends | /r/MensRights | 18/09/23 12:42 AM |
| -2 | 'Women only' train coach.You clearly didn't read the entire message. You saw one thing you didn't like and picked it out. Maybe putting your hand down his pants but at the same time that’s the worst thing a woman can probably do, compared to men who can insert himself into the woman just by un-zipping his pants and pulling her skirt up ever so slightly. Touching breasts isn't the only thing a man can do to assault someone. , | /r/MensRights | 18/09/23 12:29 AM |
| -1 | 'Women only' train coach.So women are taking videos and pictures of guys’ underwear through their clothing? Look up anything about sexual assault on a train, it’s mainly men on a woman. It’ll be really hard to sexually assault a man on a crowded train. Maybe putting your hand down his pants but at the same time that’s the worst thing a woman can probably do, compared to men who can insert himself into the woman just by up zipping his pants and pulling her skirt up ever so slightly. Women are typically forced to wear ski… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 03:11 PM |
| 2 | 'Women only' train coach.In Japan it’s very common for women to be sexually harassed/assaulted on trains, plus with men commonly taking pictures of under their skirts without knowledge. It makes sense to why there are women only coaches tbh | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 01:17 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter