TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BCP6J9YqYF6xDbB3 Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by BCP6J9YqYF6xDbB3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Unique names per site? Covered.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:36 AM
2

If your service is disconnected, you never get to send a DHCPRELEASE to your ISP, so, your IP stays associated to your modem or router's MAC address. That means when you power it back on (assuming it's sooner than the lease expiration) and DHCPREQUEST an IP, the DHCP server is going to give you back the same one you had last time, because from it's perspective, you never dropped it. It thinks you're just refreshing your lease.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:48 AM
–

Sure, if you shut down your router, you release your IP. Most people do not do this, most people simply leave their cable modems and DSL routers powered on because there's no reason to turn them off.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:27 PM
–

Most people have dynamic IPs, meaning they change about once a day. That's not true any more. While yes most people have dynamic IPs, they typically don't change daily. That was only the case when people were using dial-up where each new connection was a new shot at the dynamic pool. These days, as more people are using broadband connections (cable, DSL, etc.) they never log out (at least, their modems/routers never log out), so they never lose their dynamically assigned IP. When it comes up for…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:14 PM
–

TIL that getting a vasectomy ruins your manhood. /s
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:11 PM
2

No need to sue separately, just have her pay it off in the separation agreement. She may not have the cash on hand, so just take it out of her share of other assets. A good lawyer would be able to achieve this as long as there were enough assets to cover the debt.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:09 PM
–

On the up-side, when you meet the psycho-bitch that claims to be pregnant after your one night together, fakes a pregnancy (or, is actually pregnant from someone else).. and after you've double-checked you're still good... let her run with it. For months. Right up until she should/does have a baby. Then have a lawyer drop a copy of your test report on her along with a suit for harassment and a few other things.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:59 PM
–

How is that not community debt?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:54 PM
2

It's not privacy unless it's private. I never use urinals, I'll wait for a stall if I have to. I'm not pulling my junk out in front of other people who I don't specifically want to see it.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:54 PM
1

This is exactly how I view it. Remove the fetus from the woman upon her request. Give it every opportunity to live, if it can.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:58 PM
2

Technically, you know metric, everyone does. What you don't know is how to convert English units to metric :)
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:58 PM
0

I didn't even think to ask about the keys. I will. Even though she didn't leave the restaurant with them she did take them from him, I think that's as good as stealing them.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:55 PM
4

I just have such a hard time imagining that there is anyone in existence that takes this magazine seriously. You could say the same thing about <insert your favorite partisan cable news source here>, but hundreds of thousands of people hang on their every word, daily. By not pointing out the obvious flaws, by letting them slip by, you're accepting them.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:14 PM
2

Or worse, he could have had keys to his office on the same key ring, which could cause him to have to replace the keys being held by many other people too. Not only a large financial cost, but a cost in time, lost productivity and an embarrassment in front of his employer and his peers.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:07 PM
–

I spoke with my Police Officer friend and he said, in this situation, if you asked to split the check the restaurant could either accept that or call the Police. If he were called, and there was a clear line between what food you had consumed and the other person (ie, if you had any percentage of any dish or drink, you'd be responsible for 100% of that entire item), then he would ask the restaurant to accept your payment and would get from you the information of the other person and treat that a…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:04 PM
5

Not suggesting she is lying, she simply "got her time wrong." From her perspective, he is late, and an ass for not even apologizing for it.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:31 PM
–

So the guy has possibly stuffed up, either he has got his time wrong, or he is just blatently late. Perhaps she was an hour early. That would explain why he didn't apologize for being late.. because from his perspective, he was on time.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:10 AM
–

The argument can go both ways. Yes, totally agree. In the end teaching kids that this kind of sexism is OK hurts everyone in the end. If we taught kids to truly treat everyone equally it would go a long way to solving many problems for both sexes in the future.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:06 PM
–

this is indoctrination. no wonder modern men feel powerless -- they've been raised to think that only women can be victims, and that women have it worse, so even if your problems are legitimate, just shut up, because women have it worse. Which can have the effect of causing some young men to treat women badly because they've been lead to believe all their lives that women have it better than they do.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:31 PM
–

Silly, of course women can't be sexist. That's just them trying to equal and balance the tide that's always been against them. /s
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:28 PM
3

After taking a hover dump on it?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:55 PM
1

Because that's money the mother owes the child, and it's the father's responsibility to secure it for her. He may not need the money to raise her himself, but then he should be collecting and saving it for her future.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:38 PM
–

I hope he's planning on hitting her up for child support next.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:46 AM
–

Came here to say this. Shouldn't be a special occasion when it does happen. Guy probably only won because the mother didn't even try fighting it. Good for him for going to the trouble of getting his kid legally awarded to him in court though, he could have just done nothing since it seems the mother doesn't want the kid, but then he'd be screwed down the road if she changed her mind.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:31 AM
–

Also, Aerik "documents" us over in /r/againstmensrights. Did not know this existed - a quick browse later and, to me, it just seems full of hate.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:28 AM
–

Problem is, some people want the outcome to be equal, so they weight the input (ie: special privileges to to anything less than equal represented in the outcome) to make that happen, which itself actually creates inequality.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:06 PM
1

"If it's going to be taken from me, I'll burn it all first." Saying that worked for me before. I guess it only works if they believe you'll actually go through with it though :)
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:11 PM
–

You have the power to prevent this. Get a pre-nup and don't share financials except where functionally necessary. Then there is no big cash payout.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:51 AM
0

No, I'm not forgetting anything. I never said "It's legal for the OP to burn down his house", I said "No law against burning your own stuff", and then expanded from there.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:28 PM
1

it isn't your property if the courts awarded it to someone else. Of course not, then it's no longer your property, so then burning it down is definitely arson. Never claimed this was the case.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:23 PM
1

In many states, California included, the definition of arson includes your own property if there was intent to commit fraud, or to harm someone. "Intent to commit fraud, or to harm" - didn't I cover those already? You're not trying to claim on insurance, you're not doing it when anyone else is home, you just want to turn your structure in to a pile of embers - that's your right. You are being a bit disingenuous here and you know it, if you claim that the fire department would assist in a control…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:18 PM
1

Well of course the situations you described aren't arson. But maliciously or fraudulently setting a fire is arson, whether your own property or not. You can't "maliciously" burn your own stuff. No matter how much you hate yourself, you can't act maliciously against yourself. You can't "fraudulently" burn your own stuff. You can only fraudulently claim you didn't burn it after the fact. The common law definition of arson requires "The malicious burning of the dwelling of another." IOW (as long as…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:35 PM
2

It's only arson if you burn down someone else's house. People get in to trouble when they burn their own house down and file an insurance claim (insurance fraud) or get someone injured in or because of the fire (including Fire Fighters). Oh, and you might also want to contact your local Fire Department about the burn first. We like to get a heads up so that when people call 911 we don't come screaming out there thinking we just caught a good structure call. If you ask nicely, we might just send …
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:24 PM
-5

No law against burning your own stuff, except maybe restrictions on the time of day or the weather conditions. Pretty much, if you're allowed to make a camp fire then you're allowed to burn down your own house.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:19 PM
4

I knew a girl in high school, who didn't like her boyfriend to wear a condom because she didn't like it. And so they carried on without contraception and from what I gathered, the lucky bastard popped almost every time inside and didn't knock her up. Then he's an idiot. The one choice he gets in the baby-making decision tree and he decided to say 'Yes'. "They suck" isn't an excuse, but if they suck, and people don't use them OK, but you can't also simultaneously claim that there are NO methods a…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 08:03 PM
6

No single temporary method is 100% sure. "they suck" isn't really an excuse, or a reason to discount them as effective forms of male birth control.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:01 PM
–

Condoms stopped working?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:52 PM
–

I answered it. I'm sorry it's not to your satisfaction, but, I'm not here to serve you.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:38 PM
–

Like I said before.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:59 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:32 PM
–

The title is deliberately mis-leading.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:30 PM
–

It's an ad on the side of a bus - it's to raise awareness, not to give you explicit details of their every operation, and, it has done it's job. You are now aware of them where as you had probably never heard of them before. Go to their website to learn more maybe?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:12 PM
–

Not sure if arguing... or agreeing with my points.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:04 AM
–

Given that funds are never unlimited, you can't give more to one group without taking some away from another. In 3rd world countries such as the ones this group is dealing with, males don't need support to go to school - they already can. Females are out right denied schooling, and this is a travesty that surely no-one here can support. Besides, there are other charities that support general education for both males and females. You can't say males are being left out to fend for themselves here.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:55 AM
3

Its an ad on the side of a bus - not a research paper. Check out their website, you may just find what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:52 AM
–

Look deeper than the ad on the side of a bus and you'll see what they mean by "girls like me": Premlata lives in a region of Nepal where most girls do not get a chance to go to school. With Plan's support, this determined young girl showed an entire community the way to a brighter future. This is the wrong issue to be barking at.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:01 AM
–

Also, the OP is mis-representing the image. It says: "over half are girls like me", not, "over half are girls..." That makes a big difference.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:19 AM
–

No, it can't be said. Not at all. In the US all kids, both male and female, are required to attend school. By saying things like this you're just diluting the real problems faced by males.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:15 AM
–

I think you're interpreting this wrong. This is an ad campaign to help raise awareness of the situations where boys are allowed to go to school but their female peers are not. This is an inequality that we should all be able to agree needs to be fixed.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:09 AM
9

"Blow means no!"
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:03 PM
7

File a formal complaint.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:47 PM
–

Came here to say this. Was quite disappointed. If there was a Jesus then maybe he'd have stopped him from going to prison in the first place. That, or Jesus/God is an evil hateful bastard.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:57 PM
–

Maybe he'll go rape her now - no-one'll believe her this time.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:55 PM
–

Not really. I wouldn't be prepared to give up my freedom for $80,000/year (1.8 million for 23 years.)
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:54 PM
2

Well, more so in 1989. Now Juries expect to see evidence like DNA, thanks to CSI.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:53 PM
0

RES Tag: Probably female
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:36 PM
1

The OP did actually deliver!
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:53 AM
–

I've not heard this before. I was under the impression that men and women had similar distribution between dummy and genius. Do you have a source to back up this claim?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:23 PM
–

There are good reasons to pay different people differing amounts of money for the same work. I have several co-workers and we all effectively perform the same work, yet, we are all ranked differently based on various factors such as years with the company, overall experience and specialty training. This ranking, across 6 levels, causes us to be paid differently and given more or less extra benefits (vacation, stock options, etc.). There are both male and female workers at the various different r…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:20 PM
–

One mother even said (I think in the Birmingham Mail story) that she's got four kids and one is a 10 year old boy...so she doesn't know what to do. How about she just doesn't go there?
/r/MensRights11/08/12 04:36 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:38 AM
–

I think Obama is just kowtowing to female voters. It's what politicians do, and, it's the only way they can win because you can be sure the other guy is doing it too.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 03:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter