TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BCSteve Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by BCSteve on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Exactly; the two aren't mutually exclusive. We can still hold any individual person responsible for their own personal actions, while still acknowledging the fact that there are societal and cultural forces that shape those decisions.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:31 AM
51

Exactly. This is the exact same thing as when people claim that schools are "indoctrinating children into homosexuality" simply because they're teaching them that gay people are (gasp) normal. No one is "pushing" kids to be trans, just like no one is "pushing" them to be gay. It's just transphobic "think of the children!" BS and it's a shame it's been upvoted as much as it has.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:44 PM
6

Pilomatricoma. Most often benign, but it can be malignant.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 10:28 PM
7

What, are you saying that we need proof she said these things? Listen, if we frame quotation as a science, whose side will we end up on every time? When people demand proof of an act of oration, ask yourself why they want to frame this as a science. If we use proof in quotation cases, we fall into the patterns of quote deniers. If we keep trying to 'prove that she said that' we will never get anywhere.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:49 PM
7

I know you may think you're actually a Bose-Einstein Condensate, but really it's just a phase.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:40 PM
3

Don't think that /r/lgbt (and their mods) is representative of the LGBT community community on reddit, a lot of LGBT redditors don't like the mods of that subreddit. There was a lot of drama due to how the mods were running it, and that's why we now have /r/ainbow instead, which tends to be much more open and accepting.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:38 PM
4

Wow. Just wow. You level of ignorance is absolutely amazing. No one is "recruiting" people to be transgendered. What, like they're setting up booths at career fairs and handing out pamphlets? The only person responsbile for suicide is the person who commits it. Fuck suicides. No sympathy. None. Stick around and nut up or too bad for you. No sympathy. This statement is just awful. Seriously. This is a sentiment I've only ever seen in people who have never known anyone suicidal or have never had t…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:39 PM
5

enabled them to practice uncriticized. Practice? Practice what? .....being transgender?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:22 AM
1

I think the above power is just pointing out the conflict between saying "having sex shouldn't be considered consent to producing a child" to one sex, and then turning around and saying "well, if you choose to have sex, that's a risk you take!" to the other sex.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:33 PM
21

"All I Want for Christmas is You" doesn't even mention the gender of the other person, the entire song refers to the other person as "you" and "baby"... for all we know, it could be sung to a man or a woman, and the lyrics don't reference the singer being a man or woman either. Other than knowing the gender of the person singing it, there's nothing gendered about the song at all. So if anything, it just implies that people desire nothing but another person. And wow, that's actually incredibly he…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:21 PM
3

Yeah, that's been my experience as well, and I completely support that. I was just saying that I can understand the desire to have some place where you can take a break from being in the minority and be the majority group for once.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:01 PM
7

I agree with this. I can completely understand a group wanting to have its "own space". I dunno, maybe it's because I'm a gay guy and I sometimes translate that into other areas as well. People seem to be mocking the "safe space" idea, but I don't think that means in the sense of anything bad happening with other people around, but in the sense of feeling comfortable talking with people who share similar experiences without having to worry about people outside of that group. I know that there ar…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:21 PM
3

Yes, you would be, but in that instance it's not the fact itself that's offensive, it's the context surrounding it, and because of that context, you'd deserve getting punched.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:42 PM
2

Haha, thanks, I was just going based on what the commenter above said. Doesn't change my point, that it's a statement about fact, but thanks for the correction!
/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:39 PM
12

But those things are factual verifiable! It is merely a statement of fact that there are more black people in jail than white people (Edit: as pointed out below, this is not true, but it is still a statement about fact, whether or not correct). When you try to use those facts to insinuate things about black people as a whole, that's when it becomes racist.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:34 PM
42

So as a scientist, I have to say this... This is a question about a factual statement that can be verified with data. Since this is a textbook, I'm going to assume that in the chapter somewhere there's a citation to a study that found that this is indeed true, that girls do tend to use computers more for educational purposes. I'm all for equality, but we must acknowledge that there are differences between behaviors of gender, even races, and cultures that currently exist. We can debate the cause…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 07:31 PM
1

I must admit that I'm not the expert on the biology of fertilization. I could be wrong, I don't know, but I think that the race-for-the-fittest-sperm is more a byproduct of the evolutionary pressure for males to produce a large volume of sperm, and the "race" part being a consequence, since only one sperm can fertilize one egg. A large volume of sperm is evolutionary advantageous because males can fertilize a lot of females (and thereby pass on their genes). The wikipedia article on sperm compet…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 01:27 PM
1

As far as I know, no. The ability for a sperm to swim is due to the flagellum, an organelle made up of microtubules. If there is a defect in one of the genes encoding the flagellum (causing the sperm to not be able to swim), it's likely in the genes encoding the microtubules or one of the other associated genes that form flagellum. A sperm that mutated would probably not even be able to fertilize an egg in the first place. However, if it were able to, it would probably wreck havoc on the develop…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:33 PM
2

No, it's not. There's no correlation whatsoever between what sperm reaches the egg and how the person turns out. All the sperm basically swim at the same rate, so it's essentially random. There's no reason that a sperm containing genes for 'higher intelligence' would move any faster than one for 'lower intelligence'; the same holds for any other inherited trait.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 06:59 PM
1

WE MUST BE SWIFT AS THE COURSING RIVER!
/r/MensRights15/06/11 01:35 AM
4

thal-ates. (chemistry major here)
/r/MensRights04/04/11 10:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter