TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BL4CK_AXE Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by BL4CK_AXE on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

That sounds like encouraging dissent
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 02:54 PM
1

You should consider changing that rule then
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:45 AM
0

That’s silly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:49 AM

This is the most intelligent post I’ve read from this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:52 AM
1

I only read the last few lines of your post, but most of our social contracts as humans (and the laws built on them), really don’t support humans being commoditized or being treated as “demand”. We shouldn’t be accepting that model in any non contradicting society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 04:06 AM
1

Holy materialism
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:39 PM
1

Yeah that’s the jist of it I think. And it’ll keep trending this way. I would not that the average iq can’t really go downwards, the distribution would just shift or “renorm”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:42 PM
1

Well this kind of misses my point. The modern age is a facade. Until we obtain the ability to manipulate biology, the modern age is a glass house of sorts. As in it exists apart from nature. This is difficult to put into words honestly, but I’m trying to say the modern world is built upon nature and the traits we’ve prehistorically selected for, ex: height, physicality, intelligence, big emphasis on intelligence. So to say these traits don’t matter because of the secretion the modern world provi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:37 PM
2

My rule of thumb is whatever traits would have been advantageous 5000 years ago are the only one’s we are intelligent enough to select for. Any argument against that uses the comfort of modernity as padding which, while incredibly stable, is still weak and a secretion of mankind’s comfort as opposed to survival. Specifically I’d say physicality, intelligence. Yes, height is physicality but I believe most would select a tall lanky mate over a shorter broader one, due to social stigma. Then again …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:29 PM
3

Aren’t ceos like 5’11 on average? That’s not shockingly tall and even so still below the cutoff for the arbitrary dating standards I was referencing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 10:23 PM
2

This is soft eugenics, but height doesn’t really create any concrete advantage other than socially for the most part (athletics aside). My point is, you don’t really hear to many people selecting for physicality factors beyond height, or even something useful for humanity on the whole like intelligence. If I’m coming off as incoherent my point is people are terrible at being eugenicists if that’s their subconscious intention
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:37 AM
8

It would be eugenics if the parameters were more concrete and well-defined, but in truth the parameters of most people for dating are extremely superficial and don’t really do any “refining” of the population to some higher standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:02 AM
6

Where is this from?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:00 AM
1

It’s not like that imo. I think the appeal of the trad wife is the values that come with it (honesty, value, respect, blah blah blah) when compared to the vacuity of the “easy pretty girl”. It’s way safer socially, mentally and emotionally to interact with the first type long term, so men prefer this. Imo It’s an issue of safety rather than men solely wanting control over women. You could argue that exercising precaution evokes controlling behaviors/beliefs which is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:30 PM
6

The entire point of this post is that superficial analysis will probably filter out your “best” option before you realize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 12:18 AM
1

The answer is in the wording
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 11:55 PM
2

The proper question is how do you set the proper boundaries so these situations don’t happen and if they do you are wise and capable enough to abandon the relationship. These situations don’t come down to “you deserve better” or “is it right or wrong to leave” but more so individuals who introduce any level of ambiguity into a relationship without extenuating circumstances likely don’t need to be involved in any sort of intimacy. Just think about how the pairing of the words intimate and uncerta…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:33 AM
3

The fallacy of modern dating you can have every “intangible” society deems attractive and still fail massively. We aren’t loosing because we aren’t “perfect” we are loosing because the system is unnatural and flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:25 PM
1

Only up to about 1.5 std above the mean I’m sure.
/r/seduction26/04/22 07:41 PM
1

This is very optimistic and insightful. Thanks. Huge shift in perspective
/r/seduction26/04/22 07:37 PM
0

Toughening up would be exercising common decency in this case…
/r/seduction24/04/22 06:49 PM
8

You’re in gym my guy. Keep up the good work 💪🏾
/r/seduction02/04/22 04:40 AM
1

lol nah I’ve been told to take down any shirtless photos I have on dating apps. Maybe it has to do with age range (college aged vs. gear in industrial society age)
/r/seduction27/03/22 05:18 AM
2

Been ripped since 16, haven’t been laid in a year and some change lol. Physique has little to do with attention from women
/r/seduction27/03/22 04:05 AM
1

Their claim has nothing to do with evolution, it’s just invalid
/r/seduction26/01/22 09:19 PM
8

r/unexpectedeminem
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 08:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter