TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BRS3577 Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by BRS3577 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Y'all are surprised only 60% of men agree. Meanwhile I'm floored 40% of women actually believe it
/r/MensRights17/03/25 10:06 PM
2

Lowkey envious. At 15 I was on the verge of suicide and got abused by the TTI 😂
/r/MensRights17/03/25 09:57 PM
27

- Saying female on male abuse is fake Statistics I'm pulling this from are outdated as the source material is late 90s. But this is even more ironic when the murder of a spouse, child, ex, or partner is significantly more likely to be perpetuated by a woman than a man
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:29 AM
63

Well up until 2013 iirc, it was literally impossible for a man to be raped according to the FBI so. Can't believe it took that long for them to change the definition
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:16 AM
14

The FBI just changed their definition within the past like 10 years. Prior, women couldn't commit rape or sexual assault against men
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:44 PM
3

Low? I didn't realize 4x the rate of the other gender was considered low
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:59 PM
1

As someone who was a boy scout, I've actually stood behind this from the beginning. Girl scouts is a joke
/r/MensRights13/05/24 03:20 PM
4

I think something like 70% of them are done by repeat offenders too
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:38 PM
7

Trying to fight misandry with reason and stats may very well never work but I'll be DAMNED if I have to turn into the very thing I hate to try and convey my message.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:29 PM
8

That scenario is just so out of this world, it would be funny if it wasn't so fucked up
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:26 PM
1

Tbh I'm skeptical of this. How often were women "marrying down" to begin with? Maybe I'm just running off outdated info and my personal experience, but it was already a rarity
/r/MensRights20/10/23 11:48 PM
1

Yeah. But only because I keep seeing shit about the Roman empire everywhere, so it's kinda unavoidable. On that note... I lost the game
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:07 PM
1

The irony here, is that the last I checked, female athletes earn significantly more as a percentage of league revenue than their male counterparts
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:50 PM
0

A few years ago this sub was labeled as a women hate group by.... I can't remember, some dumb ass article
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:08 AM
1

I think you're mistaken in us wanting the right to control gestation. We don't. If it comes to it, we want the right to remove ourselves from having the responsibility of a child forced upon us. That's really all we ask. You'd be hard pressed to find a man that genuinely wants to control whether or not a women gets an abortion or keeps the baby. But by extension, we want the right to be able to shed our responsibility
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:02 AM
2

I don't exactly disagree where you're coming from. Sex is around for one reason; to have a kid. If you're having sex, then you need to acknowledge a child can be an outcome no matter how small. But I highly doubt male contraceptive in the version of a pill could've been developed in the 60s. There's a lot more money and research going into right now then you may realize. Even with current technology and innovations, creating a medication that can essentially turn off sperm production seems unlik…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:41 AM
1

Yeah idk man. I mean it definitely looks like that initial stabbing was with a vengeance, it wasn't a joke gone wrong. But when he grapples her after the bottle it looks like he's stabbing her too yet still no blood until he backs up and you can see where the bottle hit him
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:19 PM
3

I'm so confused. It looks like they both stabbed each other with a knife? But there's no blood or signs of lacerations/punctures till the dude takes a bottle in the face
/r/MensRights13/10/22 02:53 PM
8

Probably a state referendum on abortion I would imagine
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:35 AM
3

Radical Feminists are misguided. If anything, you should feel pity for them; not hatred or disdain. Just because we men have issues some refuse to acknowledge and help change, doesn't mean we have to make it worse for others. Most women, while skeptical, are responsive to hard facts (that's assuming they're normal and NOT hardcore radical feminist.) So if you support it and would vote otherwise, then don't let it hold you back. Do it. Things won't change until we start supporting each other and …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:34 AM
3

And it didn't even work. It started failing miserably so they privatized... Except obviously only certain people were allowed to be in charge
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:25 AM
1

The physical standards were the same. Generally speaking, women are obviously weaker then men. Most women flunked the physical requirements hard and in an effort to recruit more, they made separate, lower standards for them
/r/MensRights10/09/22 02:17 AM
1

It's sad man. I was trying to avoid gendering cause I'm sure it happens both ways, but the people I knew in these situations NEVER should've been placed with their mother. It's a prime example of how fucked up the family court system is. It honestly terrifies me for the future if I ever end up in that situation
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:45 AM
2

"Trauma money" doesn't make the playing field any more equal, it just punishes the mother for not wanting the kid if the father does
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:10 PM
2

Dude that separate fund part is spot on. I always wondered why this wasn't a thing to begin with. I know a few people where one parent had to pay CS and then the sleeze bag of another parent just neglected them, did whatever they wanted with the money, then went to court for more
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:50 PM
3

This puts excessive burden on the mother. Why should she have to pay "trauma money" while the father would be completely off the hook? The rest i agree with though
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:42 PM
3

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt seeing OP didn't explicitly mention it, but the question is more of whether men should be able to have the option to forfeit parental and financial responsibilities if he doesn't want the kid. Not whether or not he should have any say in the baby being brought to term; cause none of us think that from what I've seen
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:33 PM
4

This is very different from the topic though. If the women carries the kid to term under the impression you want a kid, then you leave AFTER the kids been delivered, with no indication that you didnt want it then you're legit scum and should definitely be paying child support. And if you didn't feel bad you should probably get a psych evaluation too 😂
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:30 PM
0

First trimester is too early imo. Ideal me says it should be the same cut off as abortion. Rational me says bad actors could just wait until last minute then decide to leave. Maybe a month before whatever the cut off for abortion is in the locality? That'd be about midway through the 2nd trimester in most US states I think
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:21 PM
3

Ah yes. UNSC also asserted in 2008 that “civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict.”
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:26 PM
1

Anyone have a screenshot? Whatever it was, it's no longer there
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:20 PM
2

Ik it's already been said, but the SPLC is a joke. For example, this very sub reddit was listed in their 2012 issue of Intelligence Report under the section for misogyny. Writing for websites involving mens rights as a whole they said: "although some of the sites make an attempt at civility and try to back their arguments with facts, they are almost all thick with misogynistic attacks that can be astounding for the guttural hatred they express". And particularly about this subreddit: “is notable…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:31 PM
1

I thought I worded my reply in a pretty clear way that what I said was in my experience within my sphere of influence. Nowhere in my statement did I say my anecdotal evidence was fact, nor did I imply it.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:05 AM
1

I'm aware my evidence is anecdotal. That's why I said in my experience
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:50 AM
1

Fair enough. Glad to hear you have supportive friends to help
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:13 PM
1

I'm not sure where you're from and how it impacts accessibility, but a good therapist can do wonders. I've had my fair share of bad experiences in the psych world.. I know they make it pretty damn hard to trust the field again. But I highly recommend seeing what's out there.. if you have any people irl you can trust that may be able to give recommendations or something. If you're willing to try again, finding a therapist you click with will be one of the best things you'll ever do
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:37 PM
2

I gotta be honest, at least in my social/familial sphere, I don't see this. I have friends that have dated "above" them but A LOT of the women I know don't necessarily care. My mother being a prime example; my step-dad makes a decent living but it's rather average. Career wise, my mom is way above him. In my experience, while money/status can be A factor it definitely doesn't appear to be THE factor; at least not for serious relationships
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter