TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BabylonDrifter Archive

View 1 post and 101 comments by BabylonDrifter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

BabylonDrifter/r/seduction12/12/10 04:36 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The store you bought the shit from should carry it for you. But no, they're installing self-checkout lanes to make you scan your own shit and they cut staff so you have to carry your own shit, just so shareholders can get extra cash for their third yacht. Complain to Home Depot, I'm not getting a hernia for some useless asshole millionaire's yacht fund.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/20 04:45 AM
1

And, thankfully, it seems to be getting better every year. Which is a good thing, not perfect, we still have work to do, but we're well along the way.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 05:55 AM
1

Essentially, a wage gap does still exist but it is not nearly 77% and it is getting smaller every year.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 05:51 AM
1

Also: Have you ever tried to fix a car with a plate of spaghetti?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 12:59 AM
7

???
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:30 AM
11

Hit your lawyer, fuck the gym, Facebook up, and delete some hookers.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 04:57 AM
2

That's a good point that I hadn't considered.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:39 PM
2

Very happy to see the word conspiracy removed, purely for public relations reasons. Excellent work.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 03:11 AM
11

Yes indeed. She's struck a good blow for our side.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:44 AM
13

Do you seriously want to share bathrooms with females? That would make urinals illegal. I think having male-only bathrooms is purely an extension of the physical fact that men can pee quickly while standing up. Take that away, and we're all going to be stuck in long lines. I think having bathrooms uniquely suited to the different peeing stances of the genders is common sense. If you want to force men to give up their urinals, I think you'll find significant opposition. You may take our lives, bu…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:41 AM
12

I think she sounds genuinely apologetic, admitting to the influences that contributed to her reaction without justifying it. I'm pretty satisfied with her response.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 12:58 AM
1

Very well spoken.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:30 PM
1

Hell yes. Just plain and simple male pride and equal rights, nothing more.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:43 AM
4

Should be called a STUDWALK
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:37 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights? Nobody is expecting you to like them. Women label themselves as BBW's in order to be honest about themselves on dating sites without coming across as self-loathing. Men (like me) who like thinner women are tremendously thankful that these fat women come right out and say that they're fat using the BBW code, rather than saying they are "curvy" or "average" and wasting everyone's time.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:57 PM
17

I agree. If I see the word "conspiracy" on a web forum I immediately assume that I'm going to see a bunch of unsubstantiated bullshit and wild theories. Menrights has extremely good documentation and having it lumped in with the other "conspiracies" doesn't do it justice. It doesn't matter if there technically is a conspiracy, we're much better off keeping that word out of the sidebar.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 02:54 AM
1

A Modest Proposal
/r/MensRights08/08/11 11:04 PM
2

Look at modern TV shows. It's all about being comfortable. I should have a pretty house, with obedient children, and a subservient husband, and people should only talk to me to give me a compliment. I should be able to have as many babies as I want, but if I don't feel like staying with my husband, he should still pay for me to live in luxury for the rest of his life, even if I'm perfectly able to work but just don't feel like it. If my children are unruly, the state should drug them into catato…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 08:35 AM
3

The whole myth of the patriarchy is a red herring, useful to the ruling elite to direct the power of otherwise intelligent, activist women against their fellow disenfranchised citizens instead of against the powers that are actually trampling on their rights. Average men and women are both swimming in a lake of shit, feminism tells women to fight against their fellow shit-dwellers instead of against the powers who put all of us in the lake of shit in the first place. It is a tremendous waste of …
/r/MensRights07/08/11 07:38 AM
2

Exactly. Feminism is not homogenous, and there is no "official version" of feminism. Everyone who identifies as a feminist isn't a misandrist. There are many women who claim to be "feminist" but are basically just strong, intelligent women who think that active legal discrimination against women is bad and should be illegal. These people are not the enemy. These people are valuable and have good ideas. By saying you're against the nebulous concept of "feminism" you're alienating a lot of reasona…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:40 AM
1

even if you elect to set that power down, it means nothing, because society allows you to pick it up again any time you choose. This is a fundamental point that brings clarity. You should not be asking yourself if she would do that to you when she's happy and friendly and sane. You need to ask yourself whether or not she would do this to you when she's angrier than you have ever seen her, when she's foaming at the mouth, when she's at the low point of her life. There are a lot of women who say t…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:19 AM
0

You summarized and explained things in a very rational and astute manner.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:00 AM
1

I don't think that use of a particular water hole is genetically determined. As for the tusks, that's a pretty simple change, not unlike breeding dogs to have floppy ears. Certainly, in the face of strong selective pressure, you can change a single trait in a short time. I don't understand what selective pressures you might be referring to in human sexuality, but it would take many generations under strong selective pressure to effect any actual genetic change. I don't see any selective pressure…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:21 AM
1

That all makes sense ... I 'm not sure if I understand your last question, but if you're asking whether culture can influence evolution, then the answer is no. Culture operates so much faster that it has not had much, if any, effect on the species. Culture in any meaningful form has only been around for a tiny blink of time, not long enough to have any effect on whatever genetic predispositions might exist. Culture can mask, subvert, or even reverse the genetic predispositions though. But not ch…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:57 AM
0

Yes, yes, and very rightly so! Skepticism is not and should not be about being skeptical of other people's belief systems. Any skeptic worth anything should be constantly reexamining their own beliefs, not just bludgeoning other people with their skeptical ire. In that case, it's little more than dogma. The true test of rationalism is not whether you can use the rationality cannon to blow away the ideology of another, it's whether you can point that same cannon at yourself and emerge intact.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:36 AM
1

Xenobiology? Don't you just mean biology? Xenobiology is the study of hypothetical alien life forms. Your example about lions is the perfect example of gender roles being inborn in animals. A lioness raised alone in a zoo will still assume that gender role when introduced to other lions, absent any "social construct" of gender. It's not perfect, but it certainly exists. The position that there is no genetic influence on gender identity in humans, which I believe is pretty common, simply makes no…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:28 AM
1

So you're agreeing with the idea of "turning people straight" - saying it's not impossible, only difficult. I don't think you're addressing the basic question - why are all other animals born with ingrained gender-based behavior, and humans are the only exception which lacks this? How, in prehistory, did male and female proto-humans know what gender roles to assume once this crucial adaptation was lost? Or are you positing some unknown mutation that occurred simultaneously with the emergence of …
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:28 AM
1

If there were any possible method of altering gender roles through socialization, then dog trainers would have figured out how to do that hundreds of years ago. You cannot train an animal to stop acting like a male or a female, you can only physically remove their sex organs - which has proven to be highly effective for thousands of years. If the gender roles of animals were socially constructed, as you argue, then there would be no need to do this. Also, if what you're saying is true, then you'…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:53 AM
1

This might be a stupid question, but if all gender roles are socially constructed, then where do non-human animals get their gender roles from?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:10 AM
12

You know, the thing that bothered me was not that she was being misandrist, it's that she wasn't being skeptical. She's part of a large organization of skeptical thinkers who completely refuse to be skeptical about the 'pseudo-science' of radical feminism and their own distrust of males. It's as if they were skeptical of religion and UFO's but believe strongly in bigfoot and angrily denounce anybody who doesn't.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:33 PM
1

Hey, thanks for a thoughtful explanation that makes sense.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:57 AM
1

Wow, great post, sassy. I always mention crab fishing when talking about the wage gap. And the fact that over 95% of workplace fatalities are males. Click the "Gender" button on this chart. It explains one reason why men are paid more! http://www.kqed.org/assets/graph/hd-2008osha/
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:32 AM
3

Holy shit, a skeptic?!?!
/r/MensRights10/07/11 12:23 AM
1

You could also organize "CreeperWalks" all over the world.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:09 PM
1

She can have my porn when she pries it from my cold, dead, sticky fingers.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:25 AM
1

Err, yes. I guess I was just expounding on your point. For some reason it struck a chord.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:57 AM
1

I tried to make this point once ... it needs to be explained more fully. Lots of folks fail to grok it, or reject it out of hand, but it's true. Anarchism is intrinsically antifeminist. Beyond this, any serious erosion of the modern communal/progressive state makes the feminist viewpoint quaint and irrelevant. We have achieved legal equality for women by creating a very complex and fragile modern system of government subsidy for female empowerment. It does not and cannot exist in its current for…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 05:35 AM
3

I heard this on the radio and threw up in my mouth a little.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:46 AM
1

Fap fap fap.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:21 AM
2

I think of it more as a division of labor, based on very ancient gender roles. Males are, in every species, expendable, because the reproductive potential of a mammal population is directly proportional to the number of females. How do modern scientists control game animal populations? They control the number of females in the population. The males are completely irrelevant. This is scientific fact, the survival of any population of animals is dependent on the survival of the females, and humans…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:14 AM
3

Well, most of the core issues the MR movement addresses are related to the social and legal power females have over men in intimate relationships. Gay men completely short-circuit this because they don't have sexual relationships with women. This doesn't mean they don't suffer the same broad societal discrimination, but that they're simply immune to a certain amount of female persecution by avoiding female entanglements entirely. Also, many of the male stereotypes inflicted on men by society (st…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 03:20 AM
3

I work for the government, and when I was hired, my boss had to fill out a "missed opportunity" form because there was less-qualified woman applying for the job. He got reprimanded for not hiring enough female candidates. I work on a team of six with only two women.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 03:47 AM
12

Upvotes all over. I really have a hard time with this. I agree with both of you. It's completely separate from gender, but it's completely pervasive in society. I can't count the number of times I've had to work extra hard to make up for absent parents in the workplace. Of course, I'm also a dangerous radical who thinks you should get a tax break for NOT having kids, instead of the reverse.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:00 PM
4

Men can, but women cannot. The legal system regards women as unequal to men, so if a woman drinks alcohol she is not responsible for her actions, but if a man drinks alcohol he is responsible for all of his actions. The courts are crystal-clear on this: if a woman drinks alcohol, she is incapable of giving consent to sex. Honestly, it's kinda sexist against women because it implies that women are somehow less capable of acting responsibly than men, but that's the way the world works.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:15 AM
33

“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:05 AM
3

This assumes that every rape that is proven false in the courts, is actually a "rape case" even though a court of law established that no rape took place. If a man is found innocent of rape, he's not a "rapist".
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:23 AM
2

Domestic Assault, in many US states, includes saying hurtful things to a woman. Carries a sentence of nine months in jail. It's "psychological abuse".
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:20 AM
6

Because women dick around in the bathroom like idiots instead of walking in, releasing their urine, and walking out, like they're fucking supposed to.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:09 AM
3

This is a reasonable position that I support.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:22 AM
3

Honestly, I'm 100% behind men's rights, but women and men should both be able to choose their own names. Thinking otherwise is just plain stupid. I have friends where the guy changed his name (her last name combined with his first name made for an AWESOME EPIC name) and the reverse (the chick always hated being an "Anderson" because it was so common). If there is any tiny shred of reality remaining to the idea of "Patriarchy" it's the "taking the man's family name" custom.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:17 AM
1

Divorce is also non-consensual. But fuck if I'll ever get married.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 05:30 AM
6

Quote: Current culture has dictated a consortium of platforms that the typical male is expected to conform to if he is to retain his valor, respect and yes ultimately the unyielding attention of the opposite sex who he aims innately to consort. I feel the (otherwise valid) point is lost in the bad writing. Exhibit A: dictated a consortium of platforms: What the hell does that mean? A consortium? Really? Platforms? Are we playing Super Mario Brothers or running a political campaign? Exhibit B: re…
/r/MensRights30/05/11 05:10 AM
1

Honestly, the only thing that will fix this is develop a cultural meme for young men, upon reaching adulthood, to freeze a bunch of sperm and have a vasectomy. If men can only have kids by taking their seed out of a freezer, then they have sexual autonomy. Right now, engaging in sex means you are risking financial enslavement. Once she has your sperm, she owns you. I envision a manly coming-of-age ceremony for every male, on their eighteenth birthday, where there's a big party, preferably with s…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 02:44 AM
0

Wow. My feelings as an adult don't matter? But you are ascribing feelings to a non-consenting baby ... what if a baby doesn't want to be born? Does the baby have the right to non-consent in the birthing process? What if the baby doesn't want the umbilical cord to be cut?
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:40 AM
4

Um, I'm an MRA, but I kinda like my circumcised dick. Should I be ashamed of myself or something?
/r/MensRights13/05/11 07:29 AM
6

This is a horrifying reality that real feminists of both genders should be fighting against. The majority of western feminists I have talked to do not care much about the treatment of women in developing countries and are more interested in gaining legal power and privilege over males in the context of wealthy western societies. The gender disparities that still exist in pluralistic western countries are trivial compared to the kind of widespread female infanticide described here, female circumc…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 12:37 AM
2

That's good to hear. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 02:54 AM
4

If an employer chooses to fill a critical position with a female of childbearing age, they automatically have to recruit and train a second employee to take their place should they become pregnant, because they're required to pay her to have a child while still filling in for her with other employees.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 03:03 AM
0

Just fuck her already. She's obviously hot for you.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 02:44 AM
1

When an injustice is done, why can't people just see it as an injustice against a human being? That would be awesome. Unfortunately there is a lot of gender philosophy out there, particularly but not exclusively in the feminist literature, that promulgates the idea that a wide selection of injustices against one gender is justified and perfectly acceptable.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 02:01 AM
1

I agree with you completely.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:45 AM
1

This is an anti-feminist view. The feminist view is that the man should have no say in the matter, but should be required to pay child support.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:45 AM
19

I know a lot of women poo-poo draft registration since a draft hasn't been called in recent years, but I know from experience that every boy who has to register as a teenager is affected by it. Knowing that by signing that paper, you are agreeing to be ready to inflict harm on people when called upon has more of a psychological impact on boys than is apparent on the surface. Growing up as a teenage boy, knowing that there could be a holiday in Cambodia right around the corner for you has an impa…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:32 AM
1

You'd be better off setting up a fund to give men free vasectomies.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:09 AM
1

Chimps are the same as humans, a mildly polygynous species. I recommend reading "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond for an in-depth exploration of how the three species of chimps (Bonobos, Common Chimps, and Humans) share the same sexual organization.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 05:51 AM
1

Biology disagrees. Humans are animals. Amongst all animals, there is a direct correlation between the relative physical size of the sexes and their mating strategies. In all monogamous species, the sexes are the same size. In hypergamous species, the hypergamous sex is physically larger in proportion to harem size. Human males are only slightly larger than human females, so the expected sexual organization is very mild polygyny, which is exactly what is observed in human cultures throughout hist…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:56 AM
2

The reduction in real wages is certainly true over the decades; linking that to the increased labor supply as women entered the work force is just an opinion (not just mine, but it's rather subjective), but the economic effect of increasing or decreasing the labor supply is a pretty well-understood phenomenon. http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2005/12/declining_real.html http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html That's all I can find right now, but when researching this you have to …
/r/MensRights03/01/11 07:11 AM
1

That would be the preferred state, and you'd think that the equal employment of women would naturally bring about that end result. But it hasn't; it just increased the labor supply and pushed wages down.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 06:51 AM
1

This means the stress of providing for the family can be halved for men. Indeed, men can now work part time. As far as I can ascertain, this has just allowed employers to pay everybody half as much. Think about it - when just men worked, they had to be paid enough to raise a family. That's just not possible for the middle-class anymore. Two incomes is now the norm.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 06:07 AM
3

You are the problem. 95% of western men are vilified and often destroyed permanently because of the actions of men like you. We all suffer because of men like you. I can understand why you would like to wash yourself of guilt by pretending that all men are weak like you, but you're wrong. Most men are not like you, and trying to vilify and destroy other innocent men does not absolve you of responsibility for what you did.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:30 AM
8

One of my ex's best friends trolled for suckers that way all the time. She was trying to get knocked up by a rich guy so she wouldn't have to work for a living. It worked; she's now getting a ton of child support and looking for another one. She's a smart, college-educated woman, too - but a free ticket is a free ticket.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 09:55 PM
1

Yeah, you're right, it's a spinoff on the unexpected escalation. It's also, conveniently, a way to avoid answering an awkward question. But you can bank on them asking some kind of question that might be percieved as personal - not answering it creates mystery - and making some excuse might make you more mysterious, but not answering it and implying that you're obviously going to do it later is a win. I dunno, I've said this a few times (with situation-appropriate wording) and every time has bee…
/r/seduction12/12/10 04:50 AM
1

Yes. Yes you do. I don't even know you, but I'm fairly confident that you speak the truth. Actually ... (BabylonDrifter reads your comment history) ... strike that, you're just all-fuck-awesome. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 02:51 AM
1

Physical size is a biological fact, and the males of our species have less advantage in this than most primates. I suppose that could be called a privilege, but you can't call the basic facts of biology privilege - are male mallard ducks privileged because they have colorful plumage? It's ridiculous. The word privilege means you're given a right you wouldn't normally be expected to have - so anything granted to males by biology is inherent in the species and not a privilege. Males and females ar…
/r/MensRights12/12/10 12:48 AM
7

I hear Costa Rica is nice.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 11:36 PM
1

I'm mildly in support of the ban - the posts with personal information were not meant to be discussed, and this subreddit is for discussion.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 05:16 AM
6

IMHO if you're not fucking them (or at least trying to) within a week of meeting them, they will think you're not confident in yourself which is a huge turnoff and a pretty good indicator of somebody that's not worth their time. You're not escalating, or you're doing it so slowly that she thinks you must be either gay or so timid that you're not a desirable man. You need to meet them, go on a date, get touchy with them, make out with them, and fuck them in a very short period of time, much short…
/r/seduction03/12/10 11:41 PM
2

Yes, it seems very apparent that the writer was aware he or she was walking into a minefield and was very careful to avoid offending people while making points. That's a good thing, I think. I think the writer did a pretty good job of that, overall. I think writers in general should avoid making hateful statements, and that writers who do not avoid this will not be very successful.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 06:14 AM
1

I don't think anybody could ever make a living trying to sell romance fiction to males, and I think if it were possible, somebody would've already done it and made millions.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 05:23 AM
1

This was a very good read, thanks for posting it. I hope the writer's book gets published, because it's a very even-handed and insightful thought experiment backed by decent observations and data. The fact that the writer manages to illustrate these points without setting off the classic gender-based landmines is heartening.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:18 AM
1

I think it's covered well in the article if you look at the extremities of the male bell-curve. More men than women end up at the very lowest end of the social spectrum (impoverished, dead, jailed, insane, suicidal, perverted sex offender), just as more men end up on the other side of the equation (incredibly powerful, fabulously wealthy, having hundreds of offspring, geniuses in math and science, composing symphonies). From another standpoint, you can look at the writer's ideas about socializat…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:14 AM
6

If you give your number to 100 random girls, about 5 will call you. So it's not a high-percentage method and something you should probably avoid if you have a better angle. But those five are going to fuck for sure.
/r/seduction02/11/10 07:08 AM
8

What would be even better is if we were all just sexless amoebas who reproduced by splitting in half.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 03:54 AM
-4

It would be even better if women didn't have vaginas AND men didn't have penises.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 03:17 AM
0

We wouldn't have any of these problems if women would just stop having vaginas.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 02:35 AM
7

OK, looking for a heapin' helpin' of downvotes here, but I think that anarchism and modern feminism are mutually exclusive. Modern feminism relies entirely on very complex government and social structures. Primitive humans evolved and lived in pure anarchy, and most modern feminists would argue that protohuman societies and most primitive cultures, while they valued females greatly, had strict taboos against females participating in male roles and gender roles were so strictly enforced that fema…
/r/MensRights30/10/10 03:27 AM
1

/r/anarchism really needs a strong central authority to dictate uniform policies for ... wait a second ... my brain just ... I think ... hold on ... dictionary ... can't ...
/r/MensRights30/10/10 02:59 AM
4

It really doesn't matter. Here we are.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 12:50 AM
6

Take a look at the "Men's Shed" movement in Australia. Australian men have recognized the damage that misandry causes and bonded together ... in sheds. It's a good example of the counter-feminist response that's growing worldwide; a series of tiny microcosms of masculinity developed to preserve male pride in a world that increasingly demeans and belittles the accomplishments of men. It's good to remember that uber-feminist misandry like you're describing is a product of Western/American culture;…
/r/MensRights09/10/10 12:12 AM
1

Citation?
/r/MensRights09/09/10 11:34 PM
3

You know, we once had no doctors with the authority, confidence, and skill to safely deliver babies. That's why women died in childbirth at staggering rates. That's why in the third world, and places where "interfering" with women is taboo, the are still dying at staggering rates. But I fully support a woman's right to refuse a doctor's services. It might help the population problem.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:55 AM
2

You can read many accounts of the most famous battles of the Medieval period (some of the better works listed at the bottom) which list in detail the order of battle (what varieties of troops were involved and what their social status was) - pay attention in particular to the large peasant contingent of the English Army deployed against the Normans in the Battle of Hastings, and the critical commoners among the English army at their triumph over the French at Agincourt almost 400 years later. Th…
/r/MensRights12/08/10 05:48 AM
3

The bulk of medieval armies were composed of conscripted peasant men. Elite troops such as knights and armored footmen were in the minority, and in many cases were there to make sure their own peasant troops would not flee the battle once the enemy started killing them.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 06:21 AM
5

I'm facing three years in prison right now because of the same exact situation. My girlfriend hit me four times with an axe, attacked me with a knife, and broke a shelf over my head. I pinned her down, just as you did, and three days later I was arrested and spent four days in jail, now I am going to trial for domestic assault. Even though I'm innocent, I will most likely lose my job, my home, everything I own, my right to own firearms, my right to vote, and I will spend the rest of my life doin…
/r/MensRights15/07/10 04:32 AM
0

You guys should keep going. I have popcorn.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:25 AM
1

Have you ever worked in an industrial setting? I have. I moved 800 bombs per day using a hydraulic jack and got my foot crushed to a pulp by a guy dropping a 38,000 pound battleship radar platform on me. Most of my work was either pushing pallets of bombs around or standing over a 50,000 gallon sulfuric acid bath for electroplating. But you're right, women outnumbered men in my industrial setting. All of them had the same job: peeling the adhesive coverings off electroplated parts, and sorting a…
/r/MensRights27/05/10 04:14 AM
1

Sorry, poorly spoken on my part. I would not have bothered to correct you if your post was not otherwise intelligent and well-reasoned, which is why the word jumped out at me. I don't disagree with your post.
/r/MensRights20/05/10 10:52 PM
1

Oh, I didn't disapprove of the content. Actually I agree with you and enjoyed reading your post; you came across as well-reasoned and smart on the whole, which is why that word jumped off the page at me while reading it. For some reason this one word drives me insane. I could tell by your post that you would want to be using the right word.
/r/MensRights20/05/10 10:46 PM
1

"You point is mute" The word is MOOT. It's a MOOT point. Not a MUTE POINT. You sound like an idiot when you use the wrong word here. This has been creeping into corporate speak for years now; my last boss at a fortune 500 did the same damn thing and everyone laughed their asses off at him because of it. http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861631178/moot.html
/r/MensRights20/05/10 01:33 PM
19

Well, a lot of men take it very seriously. We care deeply about gender injustice, regardless of which gender is being victimized. Women's rights have come a long way in the past fifty years, and that's a very good thing. On the other hand, men are being prosecuted, jailed, financially penalized, and ostracized for behaviors for which women typically receive no punishment. Both (all) genders should be dedicated to equal treatment under the law and respect for each other.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 05:03 AM
6

A lot is going to happen between now and June. When it does, be supportive and be sure to let him know that his loved ones are worried about him. Get him a pre-paid cell phone and tell him to use it. Be sure to get him out of there whenever possible. My family tried to warn me that my last girlfriend was toxic, but I just ignored them. If only I had listened to them ... I would still have my good stable life. One bad relationship can screw you up for life.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 10:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter