BackgroundTicket4947 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Feminism Was Never About Equality : Dr Janice Fiamengo / The Fiamengo File 2.0 Ya that's an absolutely wild quote. Like hate them for what even?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/07/26 08:59 PM
1	“Men only view women as objects” is false and missing the point. Lol, no I am not. You can be ok with only certain people sexualizing you = those who you are in a sexual relationship with. Feeling disrespected by a man having sexually explicit thoughts about you is now a form of agression? How far do you take this, even - interacting with someone while thinking sexual things about them is disrespectful. Also this is a false analogy. We are not talking about looking at people in a non sexual way, we are talking about seeing them as sexual objects.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/03/26 02:44 PM
0	“Men only view women as objects” is false and missing the point. Again, a male with no regard to whether or not women feel disrespected by this.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/03/26 06:29 PM
1	“Men only view women as objects” is false and missing the point. I mean this is part of the point, though. All you're adding here is that she's an object that also satisfies his ego. With your OF example, the woman is still of interest because of her body and her sexuality, this still has nothing to do with her personhood. All you are adding is that they want admiration from the object of their desire in turn, and the validation that comes from that. Again, nothing to do with any quality of the person within. This entire post just shows that men don't even un…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/03/26 06:27 PM
1	What Do You Think Of Chris Williamson? Nah— you still don’t “get it”. Not sure how what you wrote after this supports this, but ok. Men pump & dump women— including probably you— because it is so difficult for men to get a match that is OBJECTIVELY NEAR US in looks. I waited for marriage, but nice try. (I was planning on remaining celibate my whole life as I don't like male sexuality in general). Also, I understand that men do this. But again, the motivation in both cases is sex. You want long term sex with the more attractive ones, …	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/09/24 06:39 PM
–	What Do You Think Of Chris Williamson? I mean I technically did include dating from the perspective of a man... aka they want matches for sex. I do understand how men view dating and relationships, and recieve validation from being percieved as sexually attractive, as their percieved status is tied to this. I don't see why women should have pity for a man who goes on there looking to use women for sex. I have less pity for men if I view it from the male perspective, as a matter of fact. If I did your little experiment, assuming men v…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/09/24 05:53 PM
–	What Do You Think Of Chris Williamson? This is basically selection bias though. You're exposed to the nature of women that go on tinder/to clubs/ to bars to hook up with certain types of men. You don't get exposed to the vast majority of women who are not doing that. That plus all the ugly women, like the great CS Lewis said "if you are ugly enough, all men (unless they hate you deeply) soon give up thinking of you as a woman at all."	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/09/24 05:37 PM
–	What Do You Think Of Chris Williamson? I don't understand this argument at all. Yes, women get a lot of matches, but most of those men just want sex, men pursue relationships with women for sex. Women don't just want sex, they want relationships and emotional connection. Having many sexual options is not a win for women, they literally don't want that. Men don't seem to understand that being wanted as a masterbation aid is dehumanizing to women and leaves them feeling even more lonely and worthless.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/09/24 05:30 PM
–	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. I think the idea that the male fantasy is having multiple women available for pure sexual use, with no need for interpersonal connection. Men see some women as "just for fun" and use these women for their own sexual gratification, often at the expense of women. Men tend to view sex with these women as degrading to the woman, as there's an element of aggression towards and domination of the woman in the sexual act. I don't know what should be done about it, human nature isn't exactly changeable a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/09/24 07:22 PM
–	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. I don't think this is the case, I think most see porn as rewarding the negative form of male sexuality, which is impersonal, disconnected from an emotional bond with another human being, and related to domination and status acquisition (aggression). Being massively rewarded (orgasm) from disconnected sexuality, from what appears to be any woman of your choosing, you train your brain to view sex, relationships, and women a certain way. I think it trains men to be more unrestricted sociosexually, …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/09/24 06:51 PM
–	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. I think you misunderstand the issue radfems have with porn. The end result may be that men are "sexually starved" (although, I disagree based on what I have seen and read, porn has been shown to increase male sexual thoughts and desires), but this isn't the goal at all, it has nothing to do with wanting men desperate for female approval. It seems that you are attributing malicious intent in order to discount radfem ideas. They still prefer men sexually starved and desperate for female approval. …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/09/24 06:08 PM
2	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. I still don’t see how you’re getting there. How is being anti sex work, anti porn, and such related to a goal of female supremacy?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/24 08:55 AM
2	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. Where are you getting this from? You’re just assuming views based on your red pill view of women. Radfems are just slightly more extreme, liberal feminists with the mask off. Radfems and libfems have very different views rooted in very a different understanding of human nature. Libfems believe you can shift culture and change human nature based in an idealized view of what it should be, in their opinion, based on their own reactions and experience of sex and sexuality. Radfems do not believe thi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/24 05:24 PM
1	Pro Porn Rant Part 2: Addressing 2 of three main radfem arguements. If this is true, why is it that rad fems are more likely to not want any relationship with men? Real reason of their anti-porn stance is to punish men who seek emancipation and freedom from women. If porn is a replacement for a relationship for a man, and with it he would feel freedom and emancipation from women, I assure you no rad fem would want anything to do with him. It's actually recognition that many men see a woman's value as sexual that is part of the disdain for porn. The more porn you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/24 03:59 PM
1	Feminism Was Never About Equality : Dr Janice Fiamengo / The Fiamengo File 2.0 I mean she isn't even necessarily for the egalitarian aspects of feminism which this sub claims to support. She's a critic of early feminist ideas as well. She's also very biased towards men. In one of her videos she states that feminists were evil for attacking people, and then not even two seconds later said the men who attacked feminist rallies were justified because they were frustrated. She also justifies male causes such as red pill that are fueled by resentment, but criticizes the early f…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	15/03/24 04:07 PM