TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BaconZombies Archive

View 1 posts and 51 comments by BaconZombies on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-15

This made me lol pretty hard. I've been thinking about unsubscribing to /r/MensRights for a while now and I think that this wave of idiocy might just have made the decision for me; while I completely support the idea that there are major problems with paternity fraud, false rape accusations, alimony, child support, et al laws, there are simply way too many unbelievably stupid fucks (such as yourself) in this subreddit that seem incapable of being swayed by logic. Pair that with the unfortunate "…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:09 PM
2

Putting aside the fact that you don't seem to realize that the idea of rape culture has been formed entirely from either anectodal or misinterpreted evidence (it didn't just appear from nowhere as some kind of feminist conspiracy against men regardless of what kloo2yoo believes), it's simple common sense that you don't successfully rebut one illogical idea with another illogical idea. You rebut it with a logical idea instead. So yes, he is in fact entirely remiss in applying it here.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:52 PM
-1

Putting aside the fact that you don't seem to realize that the idea of rape culture has been formed entirely from either anectodal or misinterpreted evidence (it didn't just appear from nowhere as some kind of feminist conspiracy against men regardless of what kloo2yoo believes), it's simple common sense that you don't successfully rebut one illogical idea with another illogical idea. You rebut it with a logical idea instead. So yes, he is in fact entirely remiss in applying it here.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:52 PM
4

I've known rapists who got what they deserved, jailed. Would a society that allows men to rape have all this? Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:03 PM
-16

First off kid (or more likely, the dad who wrote it so the internet would collectively give him a pat on the back): fuck you for implying that I am not a whole person because I was circumcised. Seriously, fuck you. Would you go to the Paralympics and wave your arms and legs around and act like you're a better person than the people there because you're "intact"? No, you wouldn't because you'd most likely be beaten to death with a prosthetic device. Explain to me how the fuck this blog post is ev…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:52 PM
3

Almost. Women commit more child abuse and rape than men. They commit more DV against men than men do against women, this is especially true in lesbian relationships. (aside from that one minor detail though, I loved it)
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:26 PM
3

And it is the "or not" part that a woman MUST pay attention to in order to live her life as long as she can before her first sexual assault, or to increase the amount of time spent between her last sexual assault and her next one, or to make the next sexual assault hopefully non-fatal or something that she can get out of quickly or minimize in some way. Because very few women get away without something happening in their lifetime. Oh, so it's not even that 3 out of 4 will not be raped anymore, n…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:21 PM
1

You're moving the goalposts again, and over ground that we've already been over. but the mass media tens to condone misandric statements by feminists yet misogyny not so much. I already acknowledged that this kind of thing is a problem that the MRM has and still contend that it is not an active goal of mainstream feminism to promote misandry. I don't know why you're bringing it back up. Feminists who supposedly "actively" ignore their radical leaders's statements is strange, no good at all. Most…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:54 PM
1

Thing is if there was a similar conference where men would honor such a book which is extremely hateful and sexist (SCUMM Manifesto is just a terrible as Mein Kampf), there would be lots of uproar also in main-stream media. Have you never heard of neo-Nazis? People get together all the fucking time to talk about how awesome Mein Kampf is, and the news largely ignores them. Do you know why? BECAUSE THEY'RE FRINGE GROUPS AND MEDIA ATTENTION MAKES THEM THINK THAT THEY'RE BEING VALIDATED. Ignoring s…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:24 PM
1

Feminists who denounce this particular conference? Probably not, because it's such a massive and popular conference that it's only being advertised on a single blogspot with a whopping 8 comments. Oh wait, I found this while trying to figure out how big the SCUM conference would be: SCUM was a piece by Valerie Solanas written in 1967; it stands for “Society for Cutting Up Men”. To herald this as some sort of manifesto for the movement is utterly reactionary and runs completely counter to the int…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:11 PM
1

I downvoted it and said people should discuss in civilized manner. Just like the vast majority of feminists didn't go to the pro-Solanas conference that you linked and say that people should discuss equality in a civilized manner. You're calling feminists out for their "silent agreement" with their radicals when you do the exact same thing with yours. I'm aware that voting is a recent idea, it was an example (and still serves as a perfectly good one). I'm not going to have the argument here that…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:35 PM
1

I am doing it myself though. Really? I just read back through the thread and I don't see you anywhere denouncing cliffoy's "feminazi cunts" remark. Again I disagree here, for both ordinary men and women life was tough. Are you seriously going to try to argue that there wasn't a vast stretch of time where men had dominion and a great deal of control over women? Just the fact that women weren't even allowed to vote until 1920 proves my point. And I think you misread my last quote.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:21 PM
1

The silent agreement with MRAs like cliffoy and yoo2kloo who clearly harbor an anti-female agenda, does say something about the state of the men's rights movement. FTFY. You don't get to call one side out for not actively opposing their crazies if you aren't doing it yourself. So enslavement of women back in the day is a fallacy... I never said that women were completely enslaved, I said that was the far end of the spectrum in which any imbalances to the right or left are "too far to the [right …
/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:51 PM
2

Thank you for being worlds more articulate and reasonable than above posters. However, I'm well aware of all these arguments and while the inherent facts are true, I disagree with the conclusions that feminism is the problem and that the average feminist is anti-men. Barring the Valerie Solanas types, feminists are generally no more anti-men than Democrats are anti-Republican. They're not trying to enact their ideas to cause harm to the other side, they're trying to enact their ideas because the…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 03:51 PM
1

Aww, it's a little troll that wants people to think it's a moderator. Adorable.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:01 PM
0

I'm thankful that you don't get to decide that, because you're wrong. This is not /r/FeministHaters, it's /r/MensRights, and my points stands that fucktards like you are the reason it's got such a bad rap.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:52 PM
3

People like you are the reason that the MRA is stereotyped as "THAT CUNT STOLE MAH TRUCK IN THE DEE-VORCE!!!" (I just saw someone post that exact sentence trying to sum up /r/MensRights). Shut the fuck up. You are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:33 PM
2

To what? When was there a single time in history that marriage, custody, and alimony laws were fashioned in a way that were equal for both men and women? You're also forgetting that most of the egregious stuff isn't codified into law, but just lives in the popular consciousness. Men almost never get custody because everyone thinks that women are better providers because women were historically the general child care providers. Males accused of rape are outed to the press and shamed regardless of…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 02:51 PM
1

Mra is a response to feminism. This goes without saying, and is beside the point. I would actually want less gov/ gov spending. Do you want custody laws clarified/revised so that the father isn't at a huge disadvantage? Do you want alimony laws taken off the books (palimony as well, although that's invoked far less)? Do you want a law passed that guarantees anonymity for the accused before it goes to trial? If any of those are yes, then you do want more government/government spending, and as par…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:00 PM
4

Links or it didn't happen. I've seen upwards of a hundred stories/blog posts on this by now and not a single person, including commenters, has named him or linked to/referenced his response.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:44 PM
1

Feminism is about people voting themselves funds. So is men's rights. So is a community that wants to get a freeway or a bridge built. So is any government effort that requires funds to carry out.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 05:14 PM
1

Why exactly are we posting ancient chain mails that have been debunked ages ago and that have absolutely nothing to do with men's rights to /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:20 PM
1

... it comes down to what is meant by "discrimination on the basis of sex/race" I absolutely agree. I just had a long conversation with my boss about this kind of thing (as friends over dinner, not as employer to employee, just to clarify). Technically speaking, saying that women are much better at growing babies in their wombs is a sexist statement (albeit an entirely true one), much like saying that black people generally have darker skin than caucasians is a racist statement by the strictest …
/r/MensRights09/07/11 08:10 AM
1

bigotry (in regards to sex or race) That's 7 real words. Racism and sexism are two words that are also perfectly real, acceptable, and help us to conserve precious syllables (god forbid there's ever a shortage that would force us to ration them). I get the feeling that your contention isn't the definition of racism/sexism, but the constant redifinition/expansion of them. Would that be accurate?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:19 PM
7

"Check your privilege", absolutely. Racism and sexism, only sometimes. The fact that they're frequently misused/abused doesn't automatically make all instances invalid.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:20 PM
14

I can't even describe how much I hate the phrase 'check your privilege'. It's a condescending swipe aimed at stifling thought and debate, a milquetoast code-word for people that don't have the nerve to say "just shut the fuck up, I have absolutely no respect for you or your thoughts." Vintermann put it better than I, but I had to get that out.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:32 PM
2

Hahahahaha, ss_camaro just banned me from posting to R4M.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:21 PM
2

Looks like somebody's desperate to get people over to R4M. On the upside, since this stupidity here just linked to the stupidity over there, I get to downvote both of them!
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:31 PM
3

False and unsubstantiated do not mean the same thing. The author completely downplays the fact that the prosecution didn't offer a single shred of concrete evidence. EVERYTHING they had was circumstantial. She did not get off because of the abuse claims. Is it fair that she got off while Scott Peterson was convicted on basically the same evidence? No. That doesn't make it a men's rights issue though, that makes it a justice system issue. Let's not forget that he's still got levels of appeals to …
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:09 PM
1

Guess what, she did absolutely nothing, just passed the ball to another office. I called the deli counter at the grocery store the other day to make a complaint about a prescription that I got and those fuckers told me that I need to call the pharmacy, can you believe it??? They even gave me the pharmacy's phone number and address!
/r/MensRights30/06/11 08:59 PM
3

Came here to say this. This kind of misleading post does not help the MR movement. Cut it the fuck out.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 06:14 PM
7

Why is 'bites off' in quotes? It's kind of a binary proposition...either she bit them off or she didn't. Also, fuck everything about this.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:38 PM
3

Came here to say this, oddly comforted by the fact that it's already here.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:49 PM
1

Oh, for fuck's sake. This is not a mens' rights issue, this is just overactive bureaucracy. The Tax Agency is not trying to deny his parental rights or deny that he's the boy's father, they're trying to verify that he has legal custody. Unfortunately, the author didn't see fit to mention the distinction between these two concepts. Paternity vs. Custody...2 totally different things. They freely admit the first and are just trying to verify the second for tax purposes. Can we move on to something …
/r/MensRights11/05/11 06:16 PM
2

Eh, 1 in 5, 1/5th of 1%...semantics. Seriously MR, cut this shit out. You don't get to bitch about the 1 in 4 canard if you fuck up statistics by orders of magnitude.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 03:28 PM
3

Came here to say this. MR is not helped by sensational headlines that completely distort the facts.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 09:14 PM
16

Shit like this is why cops should have cameras and microphones pointed at them every single second they're on duty.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 03:33 PM
6

Success! You keep using that word. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights07/03/11 05:51 PM
3

Does it matter if she is or isn't now? There were headlines across the world proclaiming her a lesbian and her name is all over google and easily linked to the word 'lesbian'. If she gets deported, she's probably a dead woman.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 03:21 AM
0

Clever, but, no really: Until recently, the vaccine death would have just been labelled "sudden infant death", particularly if the symptoms and pathological findings were minimal. However, nowadays, with an alarmingly increasing frequency, the parents (or at least one of them, usually the father) may be accused of shaking the baby to death. The accused may even "confess" to shaking the baby, giving the reason, for example, that having found the baby lying still and not breathing an/or with a gla…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 06:09 PM
0

From OP in /2x: Tonight the student government at my university is having a meeting to decide whether or not to invite Tucker Max to speak at our school. It might not be exactly like the US, but I'm pretty sure their student government works roughly like a democratic republic. (which a university doesn't have to exactly 'comply" with) They're required by law to give your transcripts. It's up to the college you transfer to to decide what credits will come with you. And is it an empty threat when …
/r/MensRights11/01/11 05:59 PM
1

I was pointing out that the OP only later went on to make the second claim, but that a completely reasonable interpretation of her original post was the former. "Whenever I try to focus and pin down exactly why he shouldn't be paid to come speak with my tuition dollars..." That's the third sentence in the original post, so no...that point was not only made later. It's not relevant that your primary point is moot? My primary point is not that he's not educational. It's that students have every ri…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 05:47 PM
-1

Not it isnt, especially when they already have the money and you didn't stipulate how they spend it before you gave it to them. You cant just give out money and then think you can control other peoples lives. Hell, this person isnt even GIVING out money, they paid a fee and now think they gt to determine policy. Based on this argument, you don't get to say anything about politics except at the ballot box: you already paid your taxes, it's the government's money now and you get no say in how it's…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 04:54 PM
-4

Show me one post from a non-feminist suggesting that someone shouldn't speak-up or protest or take any of the appropriate channels to address problems. Just one. Umm...how about a mere two replies up from this quote. No, it isn't. It's not their tuition money anymore. Just like when you go to the grocery store and buy a bag of chips, you don't get to decide what is done with the money after that. It's their money, not yours. If the student have some objection then they can just refuse to pay tui…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 04:44 PM
-1

Science department? Last time I checked, some scientific scholars think that ingredients in vaccines are responsible for autism and Shaken Baby Syndrome, and that we have to restructure all of medicine to better suit terrified mothers' needs.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 04:33 PM
0

You should learn what 'salient' means. Oh gods, I very slightly misused a word. Please excuse me while I go and throw myself upon my sword. Proclaiming something shouldn't happen because I disapprove regardless of other opinions and taking active steps to prevent this outcome IS censorship, or at the very least an attempt at censorship. No, it isn't. There is a difference between saying that he shouldn't be able to speak on the campus and saying that student-paid funds should not be given to him…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 07:48 AM
-3

If the student have some objection then they can just refuse to pay tuition and go somewhere else. Or they could make an effort to make their school not suck, with the implied threat being that they will take their remaining tuition money somewhere else next semester if it does suck. Telling an organization that you've given money to what they should do with said money is further away from censorship than what the /2x post is doing, which also isn't censorship. College is both an investment and …
/r/MensRights11/01/11 07:28 AM
-2

That's because Womens' Studies is a learning department. Tucker Max is not. He has no inherent right to speak at the school. Therefore, this is not censorship.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 03:31 AM
3

You should learn the difference between 'censor' and 'campaign against having your tuition money pay for their speaking engagement'. She makes several salient points as to why he shouldn't speak, probably the best of which is the fact that the vast majority of his stories have been completely discredited. He has nothing to teach anyone except for how to get a book on the lower rungs of the NYT bestseller lists on shock value alone. Posts like this are the reason that /TwoX and /feminisms and /wo…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:47 AM
1

The very last thing that r/mensrights needs is the kind of shrill hysterics that this post borders on. It's a single webcomic that you're taking out of context. Calm down. ASW is not advocating murder for anybody.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 05:49 PM
1

True that. Stories like this are part of the reason I got a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 08:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter