| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Is this a true statistic? Can someone help me understand?No, you really were saying that it's built into us, and that it's something we have to work against. May as well tell your bros not to rob and murder while you're at it, eh? Cuz dudes are TOTALLY more likely to commit violent crimes. I don't wake up in the morning and say to myself "Better make sure I don't rape, rob, assault or kill today", I just don't do those things, like every other normal person. You know you insinuated that men have to be reminded to do the right things and not do the wro… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/13 12:44 PM |
| 5 | Is this a true statistic? Can someone help me understand?But I also believe that we should encourage those around us not to do something they will regret (rape). This implies that without said "encouragement", a man's natural instinct is to rape? Preposterous. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/13 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Gabriella Cilmi posted this on her fb page. Suddenly I don't like her anymore.There's another thread posted by /u/I_hate_alot_a_lot from the Atlantic here and article here. If you read down into the article, assuming median income, U.S. women earn about 5% of the world GDP alone. Ballpark estimates, mind you, but if it were even half that, it's still 2.5% in the U.S. alone. Edit- format, wording. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 09:44 PM |
| 2 | so... mhra’s are feminists... Edita TWRA says...At the end gender-neutral laws, only hurt women because women lose out, as the irresponsible men are the only beneficiaries of this system. Men only benefit under the MRM system because under a government where gender-neutral laws are in place men will evade the responsibility of being breadwinners, protectors, and leaders of their families. So, basically she's anti-equality, pro-gender role enforcement, i.e. she likes the legal and social/cultural standards that men must be held responsible to … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Local radio station creates a 'Do Not Date List' for local guys that are "douchebags".Those exist already, in voluntary forms. They're dating websites. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 06:59 AM |
| 2 | [meta] PSA: This subreddit is losing touch and propagating itself as irrational, rather than promoting equality and fair treatment there's a growing tone of needing to lower the status of women ratherI respect that. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 09:57 PM |
| 1 | Objectivism in Feminism vs MRA debate?I think that for any meaningful discourse to occur, both sides have to recognize that in both cases, there are factors working for and against their respective gender; it can't become a pissing contest over who's "oppressed more". It's an emotionally charged, hot-button topic, so I feel that just reduces any chances of introducing respectful debate. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 08:54 PM |
| 6 | [meta] PSA: This subreddit is losing touch and propagating itself as irrational, rather than promoting equality and fair treatment there's a growing tone of needing to lower the status of women ratherI'm compeled to say that I support rational, educated discussion. However, when you make sweeping generalizations like: Fuck all of you, you're all batshit and cannot understand a world beyond black and white, us or them. You guys bitch about wanting equal treatment but cannot do so without bitching about women getting better treatment. I can understand you're upset, but the exceptions don't necessarily make the rules. I think that cooler heads will prevail. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 08:42 PM |
| 5 | Feminist calls all MRAs "faggots"It was used by a reader in the comment section. She had plenty of other insults, but "MRA faggot" was not one of them. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 07:41 PM |
| 2 | One of my favorite things about this subreddit is...I'd just like to point out that I agree completely with your point of view. However, I feel that you have no need to "clarify". Your point of view is intrinsically valuable because of its rationale, not because of whatever exterior values you have (e.g. fit, not sex-starved). Your statement is right no matter who says it. Basically, I think your statement is great and requires no validation. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 05:43 PM |
| 5 | If MRAs ruled the world, everybody would be equal. How is this bad? Does r/againstmensrights know how idiotic and bigoted they sound?I think it's more the issue of the "my way is the right way" that doesn't quite jive. Like /u/TheyCalledMeMad points out, instead of saying you're right, prove it. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/13 03:39 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter