TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BadGoonerTime Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by BadGoonerTime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I very much enjoy 'mediocre' people, they're incredibly varied and can offer all sorts of interest. Drama and bullshit isn't hard to walk away from, so it seems incredibly sad to me to preemptively reject life's pleasures because you fear or are too lazy to deal with the slightest difficulty. I'd suppose you'd retort that no, in your enlightened state you just know the truth is that it's not worth it. Which is equally as embarrassing to admit you actually believe AWALT as it is pitiable. Your 's…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:03 PM
0

Appears that the shoe fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:27 PM
1

When everywhere you go smells like shit...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:31 PM
5

Do you have a humiliation fetish? It's the only explanation I can think of for guys who state women can't orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:15 PM
–

But now in the “1st world” women sexuality is not repressed and male sexuality is still repressed. And this is not a prescription of what men or women or society should do it’s an observation. Men in general are not being with the sexual attractive woman of their dreams. They are not experiencing or attaining the sexuality or sexual experiences they want every day. They are not getting everything they want. Huh? In the 1st world women are being given the man of their dreams, and getting everythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:24 PM
3

Personality is a part of sexual chemistry, which definitely influences people's choice to sleep with one another. Charisma is a huge aspect of success in that department.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:16 PM
8

Dumb. Just expanding a definition until it's meaningless. All human interactions are transactional to some extent, that doesn't equate having sex for money with having sex for fun with someone you like. Women don't want/enjoy sex with you, that does not mean they don't want/enjoy sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 11:42 AM
1

I think it's a bit weird to extrapolate that high-rank in bonobos is because of 'hotness'. How would they even test for that? And my statement is not wrong, as the study I linked shows you that males aggressive towards females are less successful than males that form social bonds with females.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:24 PM
2

That doesn't contradict my information? It shows that high-ranking males father the most offspring, I'm giving you some reasons why they're high-ranking. Mother's influence on sons rank: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2010.1572 Friendly associations in males and females improves mating opportunities, aggressive approaches towards females very unsuccessful: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4536099
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:06 PM
6

Male bonobos derive their status from their mothers. Female bonobos prefer males they've had lengthy friendships with and show less aggression to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 03:04 PM
1

Probably, but I can only respond to what's written eh? And it's an interesting fact. Wonder if men would be chased if they did all the parenting or if pregnancy/childbirth is too big of a contribution in child rearing to be 'made up' for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:58 PM
3

Not true. Females compete for males in species where they male takes on the parental care such as seahorses, sandpipers, pipefish, jacanas, and phalaropes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:15 PM
1

I think displaying the flaws in reasoning due to lack of knowledge can give doubt to conclusions. I'm not much interested in debating the idea that a large portion of men don't get to reproduce without enforced monogamy, I would need some evidence to even consider it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:18 PM
1

That's not what a harem is though, harems are one male sexually monopolizing many females who do not then mate with other males. In dating apps women are promiscuous or monogamous. Sexual success being higher in certain percentages of men does not mean harems are being formed. I'm not arguing with your 'point' because it's basically 'men would rather force women into monogamy so they can procreate', I'm pointing out your basis for this belief is based upon a flawed understanding of nature, matin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:57 PM
0

Chimp mating systems are very flexible, they have three (possibly four) main mating strategies. Females prefer mating with multiple males, and will pick lower rank males. Much of restrictive mating behaviour from dominant males comes from violence towards other males, or the females, so it's odd to me that you'd compare it to the state of dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:26 PM
1

Neither chimps nor bonobos form harems. Females of both species are typically promiscuous and will mate with multiple males.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:52 PM
4

Because it's not being clean = turn on, it's being a slob = turn off. Being clean is a neutral trait and generally assumed for any adult, so if you don't know what someone's room looks like you generally assume it won't be gross. If you revealed Leonardo's Dicaprio's room and it was clean he wouldn't get more desirable, but if it revealed a hoarder situation of the grossest levels you bet he'd be less desirable to many.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 06:29 PM
3

I think you can make a huge deal out of rape and war without thinking they had an impact on evolution. There are many evolutionary influences behind sexual dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 10:40 PM
6

You list intra sexual conflict as a reason why women got submissive No, I list it as evidence against the claim that sexual selection must favour female submissiveness. the process of preferential selection of individuals with desired traits Sexual selection does not occur one way, and each sex has conflicting reproductive interests that ensure neither sex is 'controlling' the evolution of the other. Submissiveness would be beneficial to males, but a detriment to females, and it would deny them …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 10:38 PM
8

There is no real evidence that rape was a prominent sexual strategy for humans, or that is has effected our evolution. Species that do use forced copulation as a main strategy show counter-defenses which are absent in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 12:22 PM
9

Women were not domestictaed jesus. And you should look up intra sexual conflict, sexual selection and evolution are a lot more complicated than the non-biologists make it out to be on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 12:17 PM
8

You've never wanted to make your partner happy because you like them? That's sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 06:30 PM
2

Bet your flat is rank.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 06:22 PM
0

...underage girls? That shit's forbidden for a reason bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:28 PM
3

You're gonna do ALL the childcare, organisational work, domestic work, career work, and presumably never die or get ill?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:24 PM
2

This is actually rapist thoughts/behaviour. Not saying that as an insult but as a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:24 PM
1

How do you feel civilization can be credited solely to men's labour, if women are also labouring? It smells of viewing 'civilization' as just the physical infrastructure and not the connected network of labour it actually is. Someone paving a road has contributed to civilization, and they couldn't do this without the labour of countless other people. The people that made their shirt, sold them lunch, taught them language, raised them to adulthood, provided them with materials, manages their comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:41 PM
1

So low N count matters way more for men than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 02:11 AM
1

No, answer me. The only way civilization could be attributed solely to men's labour as you imply is if women were doing literally nothing. Is that what you think? Women just never did any work?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:16 PM
2

So the law is being applied equally?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 11:33 PM
2

Yeah isn't nature so fucked up? Glad we built civilization so nobody has to live like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 11:27 PM
1

Wait so you think for all of human history women just spent their entire life standing around twiddling their thumbs? The only contribution they made to civilization is generating men/more men factories? Seriously I want to know what you think women were doing all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:41 PM
5

I couldn't care less about a woman's past as long as it's only with other women. Lesbian sex is just hot and doesn't threaten me in the slightest. Why? You know she likes women, does having a dick make you irreplaceable?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:16 PM
1

Doesn't the clit have like thousands more nerve endings on a smaller space though? And yet women take longer to cum even with direct stimulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:58 PM
4

How many single mothers would there be if there was a real risk of death from starvation or exposure for being a deadbeat father?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:53 PM
–

By that same logic orgasm hasn't been observed in most male species, only ejaculation. The clitoris is homologous to the glans in the penis, they arise from the exact same tissue during fetal development, and the clitoris is present in all mammals. This shared structure is why both male and female can orgasm. An orgasm is 'sudden release of accumulated sexual excitement during the sexual response cycle, characterized by intense sexual pleasure resulting in rhythmic, involuntary muscular contract…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:42 PM
–

Meiosis. Urination. Sexual arousal. Puberty. Effects of estrogen. Effects of androgen. Hormonal cycle. Gonad development. I'll spell it out for you: Ejaculation and orgasm are separate processes. Scientists have known about this for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:05 PM
–

'it's for your own good/the good of society!' as a reason to deny people their autonomy has been used as a tool of oppression many times before. Excluding women from voluntary trials is either discrimination or neglect.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:05 AM
–

You can just google this stuff you know. It's pretty embarrassing to not know basic facts, and even more embarrassing to try and make arguments about something you know nothing about. Especially when educating yourself would take like 3 minutes. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm Here you go! This is the simple version so you don't have to read as much, as you might struggle with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:57 AM
5

The logic of that site is broken as hell. If you select 18-85 and not married, no other standards, you get 47.3% chance and a 2/5 delusion score. If you then raise your standards and are only willing to date 18-40 not married, suddenly you've got a 67.3% chance and 1/5 delusion score. Not to mention even including 'not married' as part of the score? Being married means they're unavailable, why is this considered part of the desire when it's not even an option in most cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 12:37 AM
2

I don't think telling someone you'll be there if there's an emergency is weird. If you were incentivized to hurt yourself just to talk to them then clearly it is an emergency, because somebody in a more stable state would not consider that. Doctors/therapists do care and help but they're people with schedules and lives, they cannot always be available. Services that are available 24/7 have rotating staff so nobody is ever permanently on-call. There probably are some therapists that have the opti…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:28 PM
2

You go to doctors and therapists for non-emergencies, if it's an emergency you go to A+E or a crisis hotline. You even said she would talk to you if it was an emergency and you hurt yourself. I don't understand your grievance here. Some professions have appointments, you can't just contact them whenever. There are other services that are designed to be on-call 24/7 for those situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:04 PM
2

Once I was having an especially bad day my therapist refused to talk to me before my next appointment (a week away) unless I hurt myself and went to a hospital and they called her. Huh? This seems normal unless you have an on-call arrangement with a therapist. They can't always be available and a weeks wait seems very reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:41 PM
1

Yes, rights are a belief, like all morality/philosophy. It guides our actions, it's not an action in of itself. What are 'actual rights'? Seriously how are you defining this. The ability to do something? Already a concept - it's called doing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 08:26 PM
0

I think you are just describing things that can happen to you, and not rights as they're defined by most people. The core concept of human rights is that they are inherent, they cannot be given or taken away, only infringed upon. Their main point is that society agrees everyone should have these rights and if they're being infringed upon, we fight against it. If we say you have a right to not be enslaved, you don't lose that right upon becoming a slave. Otherwise the whole concept is moot, you e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 05:05 PM
6

But when it comes to relationship and commitment, its different. Now they are picky and not only want a good looking partner but also one with a good personality. But this applies equally to women. Many women will sleep with a guy but not consider him relationship material. So is she out of his league because she wouldn't date him?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:46 PM
0

Are you granted your right to life by all the women who could kill you but haven't? Is the reason you are alive and breathing thanks to women's empathy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:41 PM
1

Lets say a group of white people decide to infringe in black people's rights. Who is going to enforce those rights and kick those white people in the ass, physically capture them and putting them in jail if not outright kill them? White people. So yes, black people have rights because of white empathy. If all white people woke up tomorrow and decided that black people have no rights, there would be no black rights. A right without the physical ability to defend it and enforce it is just an opini…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:24 PM
1

Well if you want both men and women to be able to have children and not pay for them I could understand it. That would mean that the taxpayers are paying for them instead though. If you think that'd be a worthy cause for society to pay for, that's fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:34 AM
1

But women don't have the right to not pay for their kid. Once kid is born she has to pay for and look after it, or pay child support if she gives it up to the father. So why would men get the right to opt out of paying? Abortion is a right because of bodily autonomy, which men should also have. It's not a right to opt out of paying for your kid. You can't have equality of results regardless of anatomical differences when the results are dependent on anatomical differences. It's as silly as a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 01:12 AM
2

Why? He has the same right she does - to abort the fetus within you. If you want equality of outcome regardless of anatomy things are going to get weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 12:09 AM
3

Equality shouldn't have an anatomical requirement Are we also going to make the physical toll of pregnancy and childbirth equal despite anatomical requirement?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 11:29 PM
2

You can swap men and women in your argument and it would make just as much sense. Let's follow this scenario. If your partner has no loyalty there is no reason you would be loyal to them, you don't gain anything but a disadvantage. So now everybody is always looking for an upgrade. There's no point putting anything more than the minimum amount of effort into a relationship because there is nothing to invest in. Partners are disposable, and therefore only valued in how much they can benefit you. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 04:13 PM
–

Physical trauma causes mental trauma. If you were tortured, the wounds would heal but you'd still be really messed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:59 PM
5

men like women just… because… they exist in this world No they do not. Men want women for what they provide, primarily sexual excitement and activity. If women didn't provide this, they would not be any more wanted or liked than some random dude. What you are describing as 'men liking women' is just men being sexually attracted to women. That's called being straight. The exact same principal applies to straight women, who also like men existing because they are attracted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:58 PM
-1

Someone who fucks you, takes care of you, doesn't expect anything from you, and defers to you always.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:17 PM
1

Condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter