| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Jordan Peterson, Fallacies, and the Tragic State of this SubWhere do people get the idea that PUA is a done by low status unnatractive men and that it's nothing but lying and manipulation and cheating woman out of a real Alpha? RSD channels on YouTube show the complete opposite. | /r/TheRedPill | 31/07/18 06:18 PM |
| 3 | A Thread on BullyingWas bullied from about 6th grade through high school, for....red hair? I'm sure it wasn't for the red hair (maybe it was?) But an excuse to fuck with me. Also starting high school when south park started their hilarious ginger episodes. Never really affected my view of women or men, but I definitely became extremely selective of my friendships, perhaps that's why I tend to nuke them from orbit if I see them going south. What it did do however was get me to quit baseball and wrestling. I despised… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/05/18 06:43 PM |
| 1 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?That's quite a dark interpretation, but a fair one, and more power to you. Yes, both parties. A circumcised penis lacks the extra skin for the gliding motion, which creates more friction and can cause discomfort for your partner if they can't stay wet constantly. It also lacks ridges (which are mimicked by certain condoms) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 06:39 AM |
| 3 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?Oh god, no, its solved by simple stretching (steroid cream)....... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 06:16 AM |
| 2 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?Even when done correctly, its still an invasive/unnecessary procedure done on an non-consenting person's most private body part, that reduces pleasure for both parties involved in sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 06:13 AM |
| 2 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?You're thinking of phimosis, and this isn't really a problem, and can be solved without removing the foreskin. Its also important to know that the head is fused to the foreskin, and won't retract until roughly ages 6-13. Notice that the age at which it retracts can happen within a wide margin. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 06:10 AM |
| 5 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?True, however they serve the same purpose, and you can imagine how desensitized you would become if your clit was constantly exposed, rubbing against your underwear. Same as if you stuck your tongue out your entire life vs it being inside your mouth. Not saying your stance is wrong, I agree with let the penis wielder makes the decisions, but only if you yourself aren't educated about it. Men in the states have no clue about penis anatomy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 06:00 AM |
| 2 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?For some it depends on how you were cut. most get out with a functioning penis and some extra skin so your erections aren't painful. Some don't though, and complications can come from them. lack of skin can cause painful erections, and men experience loss of sensation compared to uncut men as they age. Its one of the reasons Viagra is so popular in the states. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 05:56 AM |
| 1 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?It's only common in the states and in 3rd world countries. Europe for the most part has gotten over circumcision (Britain is trailing behind though) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 05:52 AM |
| 5 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?It's not taken seriously because nobody is educated about it, even the ones who perform it. Penis anatomy (at least in the states) consists of head+shaft. Nobody knows how many nerve endings (fancy ones too, called meissner's corpuscles, the same ones on the palm of your hand) are in the foreskin, how its fused to the head of your dick until it naturally unfuses itself, how it protects and keeps the head sensitive, how it partially/entirely removes your frenulum (another male g spot) when you ge… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 05:50 AM |
| 1 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?No, it actually will increase the chance of infection and UTI during infancy after getting it done (along with, well....death, if you're one of the unlucky ones). You don't remove your teeth to prevent yourself from getting cavities in the future, the same applies to your foreskin. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 05:35 AM |
| 3 | Why is male circumcision, not taken as seriously as it should be?Going through foreskin restoration will give you that answer very shortly (only a couple months in my case). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/18 05:32 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter