TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Baldr-throw Archive

View 0 posts and 100 comments by Baldr-throw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How can there be "equal" rights if one party literally might have to risk death or die while the other faces no risk if we expect the same "rights" for both parties? That's your first comment I replied to. Please, please explain this. That you think all rights should be equal. Don't shrink away. Answer up
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:09 AM
1

Your opinion on the matter of one doesn't affect whether the logic applies or not. If you wish to apply the logic, it applies in both cases and if you don't want to apply the logic then neither. You can't have your cake and eat it.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:04 PM
7

This same argument can be applied to women voting, men earned their right to vote by dying in their millions in the first world war, in the UK at least. Men now stake their life for their right to vote in the US registering for the draft. Women have never done any such thing. Would you then apply the same logic and argue that women shouldn't have the right to vote?
/r/MensRights01/02/25 07:49 AM
89

But asking for a paternity test shows such a lack of trust it warrants divorce from some women apparently
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:51 AM
3

Wtf are you doing here? Lol
/r/MensRights10/11/24 11:17 PM
4

Lol
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:26 PM
5

Half way reading through your post I already knew what I wanted to comment. Lack of empathy but that was already your point. I've been looking at some of those threads that show up on my Reddit because I visit subreddits like it. In posts that invite empathy to men's position in society I would expect some sympathy at least. But there is nothing, it's all about how it's all men's fault, patriarchy and all that. In subreddits like this you see at least a nod to the struggles of women but those su…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:09 AM
1

There was one person in that thread who acknowledged every explanation and 'theory' as to why women tend to choose less lethal methods except for it being a cry for help, intentional or otherwise. A woman wouldn't use a very effective method of getting help when they desperately need it. No, it's because they are concerned about the mess they will leave behind and worry for the person who has to clean it up. Men aren't this considerate you see and if they gambled more with their suicide attempts…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 01:54 PM
1

Lol so you can't defend the point that your whole argument rests on. Its just a 'trust me be, it's obvious shit, pathetic. Could have just said instead of wasting our time.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:47 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights24/11/23 08:29 PM
1

According to what? And that doesn't say that nature isn't important and also a factor
/r/MensRights24/11/23 05:17 PM
1

Lol wtf
/r/MensRights16/11/23 11:14 PM
5

If you find that shit in media originally developed by, supported by and targeted towards women im sure you would find plenty of people complaining me. But obviously not here, this is a make focused sub.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 12:01 AM
3

And biology has exactly jack to do with this Can you defend this point?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:03 AM
5

I just watched that yesterday and I didn't even notice. The phrase "Strong female lead" never entered my mind once. Bliss!
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:51 AM
3

That's always been the truth for every human, it's not gendered. The only thing now is that bad actors who happen to be women have become more "empowered" to use the tools at their disposal. Teaching your sons or young men to be weary of this isn't a tough conversation, it's a fact of life and a life lesson to be taught or learned. I think we can assume and treat young people as if they are intelligent and can appreciate nuance, not disappear into hate of a whole demographic like what fear monge…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 12:00 AM
5

This comment is super fucking perceptive and incisive!
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:53 PM
1

Sure, I'm just setting the facts straight. It wasn't a king on the throne
/r/MensRights03/09/23 10:40 AM
0

Shakespeare published most of his works whilst Elizabeth I was on the throne, a queen
/r/MensRights02/09/23 01:20 PM
3

I mentioned it in another comment but Homer Simpson is a parody mocking the very thing we are talking about and Peter Griffin is a knock off Homer Simpson. I agree they are fine as they are a reflection of tropes of men on TV, they just highlight the need for better father figures in TV
/r/MensRights02/09/23 01:15 PM
6

Hey, Homer Simpson is a parody. The Simpson's is just way more successful than anything they are parodying. The Simpson's is great, they are mocking the very thing we are talking about
/r/MensRights02/09/23 01:07 PM
1

Eric bugenhagen
/r/MensRights13/05/23 09:26 AM
3

Don't forget Sigorney Weaver in alien and Sarah Connor (don't know the actresses name)
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:58 PM
3

I have always been a bit socially awkward too and that caused me to get bullied, ostracized, and treated like I was not even human. Having been educated in a mixed environment but also relating to this I would say you would have been no better off. You probably would have more trauma relating to women even.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 09:01 AM
2

Have they done that to a significant extent? There is a misconception of these "misogynistic societies" that all of the men are pro the status quo and all the when against, and thus all the women are being oppressed by all of the men. But it's actually quite mixed, just as the abortion debate isn't divided between the genders, it's intact almost at parity.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:01 PM
1

Why? What will that prove? I can't even give you 3 male authors. The Brontë sisters, theres three female ones though.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 07:46 PM
1

I actually think patriarchy emerged because of this: it emerged back when physical strength was paramount for survival. But all the other shit that followed: men are smarter, more capable, women are too emotional, women ought to stay at home, etc….that’s patriarchy. We don’t need that shit anymore. Women are just as smart as men, and we’re useful to society beyond our capacity to make babies. Because we’re not hunter gatherers anymore Women were always useful beyond their capacity to make babies…
/r/MensRights02/04/23 11:54 AM
3

due to the fact that patriarchy constructed a view of men that means they’re stronger than women Can you not see how that is blatantly false? How can you believe in this narrative? Patriarchy did not construct this view, it's an accurate assessment of reality. If patriarchy theory is this questionable on such an obvious fact, how can you rely on it when examining more complicated issues?
/r/MensRights01/04/23 07:07 PM
3

One of the mugs for sale that I saw following your link had "(still warm)" written underneath LMAO. Whoever made that one HAD to know!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 07:19 PM
1

No so society can run. People need to work. Not everything is profit, goods and services are still needed
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:41 AM
1

Why on earth should you use the tribal if a woman is in there cleaning? It's not like you can see anything unless you are actively looking. Even if she could see, she is in there to clean and should be aware that people will use the urinal. A bloke is free to use the facilities, no matter who is in there. That's what they are for.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 09:03 PM
1

Yeah, the more the merrier. I want to see discussion!
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:50 PM
2

Definitely. Don't protect my feelings, give me the truth!
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:46 PM
3

They should be here and seeing the discussion, even better if they participate. Fuck echo chambers
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:26 PM
3

IMO opinion this guy can go the route of "acceptable men's advocacy" it doesn't stop anyone else from criticising feminism. Hopefully he will be the small end of the wedge and laypeople who listen to him will hopefully be able to connect the dots of the giant elephant in the room that is feminism.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:14 PM
2

If there was an easier economically viable way to do those jobs they would already be in place. Do you think men enjoy dying on the job?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:06 PM
5

You're doing good mate. People always try to talk on behalf of a movement or anyone else, I don't know why. But there are people who agree with you. There is nothing wrong with self reflection. I'm all for us being the movement we want to see!
/r/MensRights21/03/23 12:18 AM
4

Yes I am saying that. The men's rights movement is in its infancy. Feminism has nearly 200 years on us. The idea of equality isn't a lie it's just so far that equality hasn't actually been sought. Men are partly responsible for this as it could have been the case if men had spoken up sooner like what is happening now. But I think not complaining and taking a high burden is in our nature. It's just now we're reaching the final straws. We have to be the movement we want to see. I don't buy this wh…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:45 PM
-2

Failed? It's only just getting started really, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:29 PM
8

That is some fucked up dangerous logic. Maybe supporting equality will get most people to stop supporting feminism and we can move past the divide. The outlook you suggest is doomed to fail in one way or another
/r/MensRights15/03/23 01:52 PM
3

Just started watching this. Like two episodes in. I get it that there is an element of being dismissed for being a woman as a woman but I wish they would understand that men aren't just listened to if they open their mouths. There is a lot going on in group and leadership dynamics, group politics, everything. You have to speak up and be assertive to be heard, not just male. I get really tired of hearing 'they are not listening to me because I am a woman, I deserve to be listened to and lead' and…
/r/MensRights14/03/23 12:48 AM
1

Dude what the fuck? Lol What the hell are you going on a about? This is what I mean by toxic masculinity trap What has that got to do with me or anything I have said? Lol I hate the teeth toxic masculinity but what has it got to do with this conversation? I'll tell you what dude, you're proving my point that the language and concepts around masculinity and femininity need to be developed because what you are saying has nothing to do with what I have said. You're applying your own definitions of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/23 09:32 PM
1

You've completely missed my point and I'm not sure what you are getting at? Toxic masculinity trap? they are omnipresent aspects of our personhood, not skyrim skill trees you need to get to lvl 100 like what you're saying gender is. I never said gender was anything. And what I mean by gender in my comment above is sex, male or female. I said you can develop masculine and feminine skills, nothing about gender. Your original comment said you disagree with the concepts of masculinity and femininity…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/23 06:30 PM
2

Obviously masculinity and femininity are just vague words with no concrete definition but I think they are helpful and should be developed further, not abandoned. In my understanding masculinity and femininity are not exclusive to their respective gender, everybody has both a masculine and feminine side and at their core can be anywhere on the spectrum, on the extremes or more balanced. Men typically being more masculine and vice versa but that is not a rule, just a trend. Everyone can develop b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/23 01:58 AM
1

assigning characteristics to masculine and feminine You've got it backwards, characteristics are not assigned to the terms, the terms describe the characteristics. By abandoning the terms then you are only hindering language and conception, it will do the opposite of what you want; reducing these characteristics to be only male or female. It's a step backwards. For example, a job should not be advertising for men or women but for conformance with certain characteristics the job requires: masculi…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:21 AM
1

Men can be tender when the situation calls for it and women can be tough and aggressive, particularly where their children are perceived to be in danger Both of these are examples of masculine and feminine. They are broad vague terms that encapsulate a lot, I don't think the language we are using is really fit for purpose but those examples are not counter to masculinity or femininity. The feminine is chaos and change, mother nature or the ocean, powerful but undirected. A woman becoming tough a…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:56 PM
1

What has that got to do with anything? I think the white feather campaign was pretty disgusting. Not sure what else to tell you
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:06 PM
1

by making us more willingly disposable You've made a leap here. Where does stoicism say you should become more willingly disposable? Self sacrifice for the greater good is sometimes necessary, by anyone. But you should be discerning about what you are sacrificing yourself for. Stoicism was never about throwing yourself on a grenade for the first person who asks. The bad part is the expectation that you should willingly sacrifice yourself, not the sacrifice if it is worthy. All the men who laid d…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 03:34 PM
1

Teaching everyone, not men. And yeah I think everyone should be increasing their utility to society, I'm a huge fan of education. Shocking, I know. Do you know what male disposability is? Yeah, of course I do. It's a thing, but it's not about having responsibility or being encouraged to better the world around you. It's about being easily discarded because that is the traditional value of the male, to self sacrifice in death. Addressing male disposability doesn't mean we need to throw out everyt…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:57 AM
2

Yep lol what you quoted there sounds pretty pro male to me. It's not sexist either. Explain what you disagree with. But is that all you have?
/r/MensRights03/03/23 02:33 AM
1

I'm not splitting hairs. Being manly has nothing to do with your strength of character, nor is it a measure of how much you are a man. Being manly is just being a stereotype, like an extreme on a spectrum. This person has a lot of stereotypical characteristics of men, he is manly. But no greater or lesser a man. Just a different type of man. but there is tremendous social pressure to push stoicism onto men I wouldn't call it tremendous, I think historical is more apt. Besides, what is inherently…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 01:24 AM
1

stoicism is considered a masculine trait. Do you believe that a man who expresses emotions or has concern for their own well-being is "less of a man?" No, being less masculine anything doesn't make you less of a man. It can make you less manly though. Do you think that boys are born stoic or do you believe that it is the result of socialization? I think men become stoic. That's my experience, I didn't have my emotions socialised out of me as I was a boy. I have just naturally become more stoic a…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:26 PM
6

There are extremely masculine trans men who are pregnant. square that circle. What's wrong with what you have there? It sums it up well. No, masculinity describes things associated with the male gender Which is the redundant part in your " There are extremely masculine trans men who are pregnant" sentence then? If they are extremely masculine but also trans men, what is the distinction between the two? It can't be biological, they are pregnant, so it must be within the gender construct you claim…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 11:15 PM
9

Yeah what the hell has fashion got to do with masculinity? Lol
/r/MensRights02/03/23 10:49 PM
1

That is so backwards, I can't even respond.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 03:38 AM
1

Yeah, that's fine if someone is willing and capable of applying it to themselves. Were talking about society here though, not individuals
/r/MensRights02/03/23 02:00 AM
2

Your advice is okay if you were speaking to a single person having trouble in life. Talking about all this to them won't actually help anyones situation, it might help them understand it though. But what we're talking here about are societies views and attitudes. Now is not the time for detachment.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:55 PM
2

Have seen a lot of documentaries and heard about surfing saving many people close to suicide, especially veterans. Definitely go and surf man!
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:52 AM
2

Because all men/people deserve rights. It's not a war. There are no monoliths. If you pick a side and go with them no matter what, you're not paying attention or really thinking at all. You can consider yourself left or right but dislike the party or the leader or their policies. It's not an identity. The right is also not pro men's rights. You won't find many feminists there, sure, but the right also opposes men's rights e.g. the draft.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:23 AM
2

I've only seen the sub on Reddit, not any other space for love island but most people are criticising the women. And I assume the sub is mostly women. This kind of behaviour goes on and has been overlooked before but it's so extreme this series that you cannot not see it. It seems like it's leading to actual discussions about essentially empathy gap and the women are wonderful effect which is good. These women are being called "fake feminists" though. Not many people making the connection that i…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 09:19 PM
1

I actually haven't been aggressive one bit, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:19 AM
-1

Oh boy, even one of the things you quoted in your response I never actually said Well duh lol it's obviously changed to make a point! You're obviously too sharp to not notice a completely changed sentence, silly me. I could take the bait and boy do I have a lot to say about the various points of your response Obviously not. I'm not surprised either, asking for a discussion and pussying out is fairly typical, and boring.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:10 AM
0

The need to enter the work force is quite different than the desire for intimacy It was an illustrative example about a desire for something that you dismissed as "a status thing and just a box to check". Not a direct comparison. But I'll bite. The reasons for "needing to work" that you listed are not the reasons that women entered the work force. See human history before the industrial revolution. It's not that women didn't work, they did, but they also had a much more important function in the…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:31 PM
2

or honestly I might just be asexual I don't mean to be mean but have you not just answered your own question? Sex and intimacy is a big part of life. It's a human need, I don't know what else to tell you. Are you just told that you should covet sex and that you’re not good enough unless you have a sexual partner? That's what the term incel implies, (in the pejorative sense) take that as you will. having had sex and a long-term partner is kind of like… a status thing and just a box to check? L Ag…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 08:22 PM
14

I disagree. While I don't think I can give you any objectivity and there is variance, but it's variance about a "mean" if you catch my drift. If it varied from culture to culture in some cases exchanging places with feminity you would be right. But it doesn't. War is universally human and for men to (primarily) fight that war is also universal, as far as I am aware. That's just one example but throwing out masculinity as a useful concept is not the way to go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 04:13 PM
2

I have a better explantion. Both men and women in our culture have a ton of baggage and probably need to work on our trust issues as a culture. I agree, that sounds like a much healthier way of approaching the issue, I've not really come across that kind of sentiment before. It sounds all new agey but love is what will heal the divide. I'm sure Martin Luther king has a quote about it but I kind remember what that is right now.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:19 PM
1

Lol pipe down, you're done.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:12 PM
2

I actually come from a physics background, that why I went so hard on the proof thing there I think. Yeah, I definitely think they must have some things right. For all my whining about feminism here my main gripe is that the defacto 'equality' movent is so unbalanced and lacking in the male perspective. The right way to go is always going to be one of balance.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 04:31 AM
2

By scientifically exists, i mean, it is written about and studied extensively within a scientific field with at least some evidence showing its existence. Right so what you are saying is they are measuring a construct that they themselves have named 'toxic masculinity'. And this construct is measuring the thing they defined it to measure. Like how an IQ test measures what an IQ test measures. It doesn't scientifically 'exist', it is a construct or concept in the field of psychology. As an exampl…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:27 AM
2

I'm not writing off any field. I pointed out that you cannot say something scientifically exists when you don't have the reproducibility to prove it. The methods are not as easily reproduced because of the nature of the topic. That's not an excuse. It's not proven, it's not scientific fact. Doesn't mean it's not useful but you can't say these things 'scientifically exist' as if it's some done thing in the way atoms 'scientifically exist'. You don't get to do that. Your example of IQ also doesn't…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:15 AM
2

But there we have it, men have their own certain qualities which they express and traditionally represent, while women have their own. Fucking hell lol. That long dance all for that? You could have just asked. Here you go, here's the same sentiment but in my words with the important distinction that its not specific to men or women. Every human has both masculinity and femininity with either being TYPICALLY expressed by their respective gender. Masculinity is a set of certain qualities which are…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 01:01 AM
2

Thanks for summing that up. We could just reread the few comments I left in my own words but if it helps. So is James Bond as suave and cool as an average woman? No, he's much more so. Still avoiding the controlling the situation part? Why is that?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:45 AM
2

Who is saying that? A woman can be Suave and cool. She might be more masculine, or in her masculine if she is behaving sauve, but there is nothing stopping her. I like how you skipped over the controlling the situation part and just went for the adjectives though.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:36 AM
2

With James bond lol? No mate I think you are. Who are you kidding? charming, confident, and elegant (typically used of a man). "all the waiters were suave and deferential" Google definition there for you pal. And seduction isn't gendered, any thing or person can seduce another. Edit: yeah James Bond is the epitome of a feminine character. Why are you even trying with this shit? lmao
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:26 AM
2

James bond sounds feminine to you? Right. Of course it does. Stumped for a better reply?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:19 AM
2

An example of what mate? I just told you it's not an action. James bond being suave and cool and in control of a situation, there you go
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:46 PM
1

On the level of sub communication and behaviour, like an energy or a vibe. Not a performance or in the doing of things. More like how you do them and how you carry yourself. You don't suddenly become masculine by helping someone to lift something or anything like that.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:30 PM
1

I think so, I think that's also pretty apparent from my comment
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:39 PM
2

How about it being perceived as just being a good person. Why do you need to bring masculinity in to it? Everything in your list can be done by Venus herself or any other person feminine or masculine. Masculinity and feminity are not performances. A guy sitting in a room will still be masculine, it's just a part of who you are
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:10 PM
7

No, that's so wrong. Men are quite accepting of women however they are. I'm not sure what the percentages are but the majority of men would be okay with a bisexual female partner. Women okay with a bisexual male partner, not so much. A man has to fulfil a list of criteria to be attractive, every woman has their own criteria they are looking for, everyone here and everywhere knows that.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:59 PM
7

Thanks for pulling all that out! The word “testosterone” appears nowhere in the report, and the possibility that men and women’s personalities differ for biological reasons is unsayable and unthinkable. I had an discussion somewhere in Reddit the other day with someone who insisted masculinity was entirely a social construct. I asked them to explain sexual dimorphism and differences in behaviour in the animal kingdom. As expected no reply.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:52 PM
4

These are commonly used constructs in the field of psychology. You can call it absurd, but scientifically speaking, it actually does exist. No, they do not exist scientifically speaking or otherwise. But especially not scientifically. For it to exist 'scientifically', you would need to devise an experiment that proves it's existence that can be repeated independently, you know science. A concept in a soft science such as psychology, a field which has very poor reproducibility, does not 'exist'. …
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:40 PM
11

Yeah I agree maybe he was a dick and I'm assuming that since they were married in the first place the guy had no right to exclude his wife from his will. That stuff was already hers, right? But about the daughter thing, maybe they were selfish assholes, who knows. I don't like that they got anything. Whatever his reasons, he decided they shouldn't. Your job as a man is to provide for your family and make sure they are taken care of when you die. That's not your job as a man. But I agree with you…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:49 PM
40

A lot of hand wringing about how his videos might encourage misogyny, not even a single mention of how the woman in the first video in question talks about ripping the guys dick off. It's not even mentioned. I would be more willing to entertain a conversation about how it might encourage misogyny (I don't think it does) if they even mentioned the vile overt misandry in the video that set this whole thing off. It's irrelevant apparently and I guess completely okay. If anything is going to encoura…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:37 PM
3

My answer to your comment here is that the very topic is refusing sex and intimacy for control of the partner. This isn't a dead bedrooms thread. Why are you talking about when intimacy dies for whatever reason? Were talking about cases of "no sex for you until.." It’s interesting that you perceive an absence of intimacy in a relationship exclusively as intentional manipulation When we're already talking about absence of intimacy in a relationship as an intentional manipulation tactic, I don't f…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:53 PM
5

If they do, something is wrong, and a lack of sex would be a symptom of that disconnect. There is no lack of sex, there is deliberate withholding of sex that's restored when that person gets there way. It's not a symptom, it's an action. I didn't spot it at first but you're completely removing agency from the women in this scenario. That's why your talking about it as if it's a symptom, not a doing by one partner. The woman has no agency so no choices to blamed for, it's a symptom of a 'sick' re…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:02 PM
2

I'm not one for being flattered, but I will take it, thank you. I hope you learned your lesson about being more introspective before leaping to wild conclusions about the motivations of others.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:25 AM
1

They have a community. The people who already are their community. If the rest can be handled by robots what's the need for anyone beyond friends and family. Would solve a lot of problems eg. the climate and limited resources. Just saying there would be an incentive, not that the rich would ever do anything like that
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:43 AM
2

This has a ring of projection to it. Completely out of the blue, you are the only one saying anything like it so you are the thinker who thought it. Perceive sex as something given or denied as a reward or punishment often also have an underlying belief that sex is more about power than romance. They enjoy the notion of making others submit to their desires, and get off as much on the idea that they’re making an unwilling person submit as they do on the actual act. I took out the opening referen…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:45 AM
1

So people are entitled to things from you? Are partners entitled to certain things?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:41 AM
3

The fact that he's lying about being in a restaurant I think gives it away
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:33 AM
2

That's the thing, you can cut the consumer's out. Meaning the only consumers are the rich owners and the only producers are the ai. That's at the heart of ai and automation. Once that's done I suppose, the rest of the population would be sitting ducks, when there is no real "need" of them.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:12 AM
1

Good analogy, but women scientists are more countering the norm. Id say it would be more like women nurses nursing the sick being ironically pointed out as toxic femininity in a world where the phrase toxic feminity is used to criticize women's nurturing/coddling/emotional nature. Maybe it was in an attempt for equity between a childs love for both of the parents, men deciding to step in and usurp the mother's role in bond forming with their child and being the primary care giver. Women being "t…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:56 AM
4

True but men didn't enter the world of women and start criticising them for being women
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:37 AM
1

They are two completely independent statements mate
/r/MensRights09/02/23 07:24 PM
1

A pipe obviously. Maybe reread my comment. My point is that it's a luxury. Many people and societies are fine with a just a well
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:49 PM
1

Because that's a fairly easy fix. I'm not saying plumbers aren't needed, they are. I'm saying that lawyers hold far more power. If your kitchen sink starts spraying everywhere, you can just turn the water off until it's fixed. That's an inconvenience at best, you can fix it yourself, there's nothing stopping you from YouTubing it. Even if you will never get it fixed because no plumber will do it your life isn't ruined, you're just stuck with an inconvenience. If all the lawyers and judges and wh…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:56 AM
-1

No, you could get by with a well. If you want to build a society I would focus on the law before wether people have taps etc. If I needed a lawyer to get me out of a jam and a plumber to sort my plumbing and I could only pick one. I'm gonna pick the lawyer. A soggy house Vs being in prison or executed or sued for all I have? I'm taking the lawyer
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:02 AM
1

It's an old throw away account. I wouldn't get too excited. Hmmmm, water & sewerage v lawyers Vs lawyers? Nah, it's more convenient access to water and drains Vs one branch of the entire state, and in effect the rest of it, and importantly, the enforcing arm, the police. Not a hard choice for me bro
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:00 AM
-1

Pipes are not a cornerstone of society
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter