TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Balegrim Archive

View 2 posts and 29 comments by Balegrim on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

DiscussionBalegrim/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:39 AM
0

QuestionBalegrim/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:32 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-12

50k people actually liked a status that would troll the shit out of a bunch of rubes who are losing their shit over a snide comment while ALABAMA ABORTION LAW. Men are so far from any kind of real legal oppression compared to women. But they collectively clowned you pretty good.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:49 PM
1

I'm actually asking you guys to quit whining about conspiracy theories, because you all don't believe there are conservative judges who could get through a nomination without a sexual assault allegations. I'm sorry but if you believe every conservative judge pick will be falsely accused of sexual assault to screw their career you believe in some liberal Sorros Illuminati shit. XD So if you're ready to start being rational and accept that not every conservative judge will be hit with an allegatio…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/18 06:16 AM
-1

Umm, if I were a rape victim the day I'd come forward would probably be to fuck my rapist out of occupying one of the highest offices in the land. At that point dealing with the shame practically becomes a civic duty you colossal retard. XD
/r/TheRedPill12/11/18 06:04 AM
2

Or we could just pick a judge who would sail through these proceedings without any allegations. Plenty of justices and conservative presidents who never had sexual assault allegations. But heyo. Conspiracy and shit stains is your people, apparently.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 05:27 AM
-6

Like men don't jump from pussy to pussy though. XD
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 05:25 AM
1

You're probably right. I honestly couldn't make anything of all the down-voting except people being sore. Props for saying something.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:03 AM
1

That sounds more like being sore than being equal. I thought the MRM was supposed to promote equality, not carry grudges. Why shouldn't women be involved in any and every legal discourse regarding their rights? ESPECIALLY among politicians and/or legislators? Does anyone seriously have a problem with this? The only thing that's been underscored is that men, evidently feel women shouldn't be at the table when we're discussing their rights? If that's a good representation of the MRA, then I have t…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:24 AM
-7

So, let me get this straight. . . Women insisted on sitting in during a discussion where prominent male leaders were slated to talk about women's rights and address violence against women? And there are people here who feel women should be absent from that discourse. . . Unlike some of you guys, the actual leaders probably recognized they would have a more fruitful and enlightening discourse with women present to add to the discussion about violence against—you know—themselves, as opposed to tal…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:41 AM
1

Thanks! This answer is very helpful.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:24 PM
0

I do have another question, slightly off topic. But is this considered official web material of the MRA: http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Is it their main site? Or considered to be a valid "front cover" type page that frames the direction of the movement well? Potentially at its best? Or worst. I realize like any political movement, it is entirely possible there are a range of groups who might shape the MRA a little differently from the next, running a gamut of moderate stances and extreme ones. I'd…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:30 AM
-4

Well, the year is 2014 now, and the CDC and a wide variety of researchers are still behind it. I don't contest that you can find counter studies to challenge their findings. I'm just saying that circumcision, as a practice, has been put to modern day scientific scrutiny and is still widely accepted as a healthy practice based on medical findings. I'm not interested in having a back and forth with out about the health effects of circumcision. All I meant to say is that comparing an act supposedly…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:49 AM
-3

Fair enough. Though for obvious reasons, I'm certainly glad my parents decided that little detail for me as a baby. Getting one as an adult male is an entirely different ball game. And I'm not just talking about the fact you would choose to of your own accord. Though like I said, I consider your view fair. But not comparable to an act of violence meant to mutilate a woman's vagina. Unless you guys are referencing a medical procedure comparable to circumcision I'm unaware of, that was formerly of…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:43 AM
-1

Hmm. Well to be fair, circumcision is a jewish tradition, and shown by many studies to be beneficial, health wise. It's practiced in both religious ceremony and for health reasons, and much of the modern world regardless of creed does this. While I appreciate your viewpoint, I'm personally glad for my circumcision. Don't see it as a mutilation at all. Female genital mutilation, I get the sense, is a crime of violence directed towards women and often performed in an effort to legitimately hurt th…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:14 AM
1

Yeah, I'm looking at the side bar. But still very interested in getting a feel for proponents of the movement. I certainly know what I've heard about them. Been told about them. And am presently doing my own independent research of them to see which accusations hold salt and which ones are baseless in some broader sense.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:50 AM
1

I'm more interested in knowing how relevant you feel those questions are.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:06 PM
0

If those strike you as "talking points" instead of healthy values to be encouraged among men, you are a part of the polarized and extreme entity you claim to resent. Would it matter if a feminist brought these issues forward or not? Is your mistrust and resentment of the female diolgue so great that even good working social and personal values that should be encouraged in men are to be dismissed? Are you saying these are not the values you would have tried to impress upon Elliot and guys like hi…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:55 PM
1

I'm glad you thought so. :)
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:39 PM
1

At least my partner doesn't have to deal with logic leaps like "you support violence against men for expressing an awareness of why women are at greater risk" in violent situations. I'm with the program. Nowhere do I assert violence of any kind is acceptable.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:55 PM
1

Fair. Shaming people for not being sexually active has always been ludicrous in practice.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:30 AM
4

-Loneliness Not sure exactly how we can tell if a man is lonely or not. Some go through lengths to hide it. But I'd say as men trying to help men we should try to step outside our comfort zone, and make new acquaintances on respectful and friendly terms. In this endeavor, we should strive to exercise good etiquette and make people comfortable with us. -Mental illness Professional help is probably needed outside of personal support. If you know people who are mentally unwell, encourage them to ta…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:03 AM
1

Sorry, it just sounded to me like guys that fit Roger's bill and that of the men described in these posts could benefit from having those values emphasized by males they trust and confide in. Serious mental problem? Probably need professional help. Otherwise why ask?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:48 AM
-11

Treat women as people and peers. Do not assume you are smarter than they are, or otherwise try to manipulate them. Focus on having sincere discourse with women. Understand sex is a mutual and consensual experience between adults, it is neither a commodity or guarantee. Strive to make women feel safe and free from pressure in your company. Pressure for sex is one of the things they feel all the time from their large volume of male acquaintances. Don't condemn female promiscuity. Many people exper…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:48 AM
1

You can paint as many caricatures about me and my perception of men and women as you want. But the results of violent crime in our society speak for themselves. You're right, it's not a competition about who suffers more, but the fact women do, seriously, and often fatally should indicate something to you. Regardless of how you feel about that man's "helplessness" and the camera man's work using an actor to play a male victim in public (since we have a lot less of them), the raw, underlying know…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:06 AM
1

I'm to disagreeing with you in saying that violence is deplorable and men who are abused should be regarded seriously. I'm disagreeing with you in your assertion that women are not at GREATER RISK. Do you acknowledge women are at greater risk? At the end of the day, who's really going to kick who's ass in a seriously violent altercation? Men aren't afraid to walk home in the dark because of other women. They are afraid to walk home in the dark because of other men. It's not heaps of men with bro…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:14 AM
1

No. That's not behavior I condone. I'm not saying it's dandy, either. But you expected some kind of intervention for a man who was in no clear sign of danger. Who by all public perception, was just dealing with his angry girlfriend. NO ONE had the impression she would throw him to the ground, and punch him so hard in the head he might lose vision in his right eye (as actually happened to a female victim of male violence). Maybe if you could stop seeing red for five seconds you'd understand that …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:33 AM
1

"Actually, the video makers seem to have gone to some lengths to balance things out. The women is of sturdy build, and the man does not tower over her. And he's not a beefy muscled type." -Doesn't have to be for me to tell he looks like he'd have a clear physical advantage. Women get abused by guys who look like that plenty frequently. "The public are not concerned for his safety, because they are not concerned for his safety. And why are they then not worried that he may "lose his cool" when sh…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:42 AM
1

Also worth noting. . . Did anyone else notice how women were the people who responded? Pretty much no men involved themselves in either scenario.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:50 AM
-4

Yeah. Society is way biased. People forget defenseless men are getting their asses kicked by women all the time. Have you seen girls? They are like hulking juggernauts. There should be some kind of staggering statistic about how most rape crimes are perpetrated by women, against men. Even though in most cases of rape against men, it's men raping men. If that sounded silly to you, now you perhaps understand why it was wise to withhold sharing. Because your friends would call it out for the BS it …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:23 AM
1

This isn't really a double standard. But it does attempt to be deceptive. You aren't comparing apples for apples. You have a larger, stronger looking male, aggressing on a woman who appears smaller and not as physically capable. The public isn't concerned for his safety because they both look unarmed, and it's a solid perception, if not guess, he would just freaking lay her out IF he lost his cool. Which is exactly what they were afraid might happen if they let him do that. A lot of males would …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter