TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BanHammerSupreme Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by BanHammerSupreme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Had a read through it - it's not very detailed and I don't have time to chase up sources, but the only paper which makes the claim that it is women that suffer more is Civil Wars Kill and Maim People—Long After the Shooting Stops, which bases this on the data that there are more areas in which women are affected, rather than women being more adversely affected. They also come up with a number of indirect effects similar to the WHO estimation of direct effects, and given that direct effects are, …
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:56 PM
16

You could try the Iraq Body count, they have a website :p A link to an article about on that website: 11% of victims across all weapons types were Iraqi females, and 9% were children See a more detailed analysis here: Our demographic analysis shows that Iraqi civilian men are the main civilian victims of lethal armed violence in this war, as in other wars
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:22 AM
28

Civilian casualties are overwhelmingly male, actually. In the Iraq war you can check the Iraq body count project to see that adult males make up 80% of civilian casualties on their own, and male children are killed more than female children, and this is standard for armed conflicts.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:33 PM
2

Hi! Feminist here. I'll give you some of my thoughts. Firstly you say that you have never experienced institutional misandry but mention examples of it - both in your original post and some of your replies - lack of recognition of male rape victims (both legal and otherwise) is systemic and institutional - as are issues relating to men as victims of domestic violence. When you mention in one of your replies that you have been attacked for being bisexual - that is an example of the intersection o…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:15 PM
-2

Sex had by women != woman who have had sex. Depends on which figure you are interested in.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:01 PM
1

Little point - in industrial revolution England the primary employees of cotton mills were women and children, not men.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:47 PM
1

Your points seem better served with the explanation that women were considered more valuable than women were considered weak.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 06:39 PM
1

I don't think that that is a fair representation of NSWATM (manboobz I will not discuss - they don't even pretend to be sympathetic to the oppression of men). I read it irregularly, and it's usually not too bad, though there are some authors I have issues with more than others. I don't think that ozy is attempting to marginalize men's rights issues at all. I am a little worried about the move to TGMP, but we'll see how it goes.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:25 PM
-1

The article is extremely problematic. There are many serious gendered issues facing men (one example being murder rates ranging from 4-8 times higher globally), and by putting foward an image of men's rights looking only for things like: "...to be repeatedly told that you can't multitask" is to minimize these problems, and silence the people who are the primary victims of this, and other, kinds of anti-man discrimination. By framing it in this manner they are, in fact, contributing to the proble…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:22 AM
1

Just replying here to say I've not downvoted you. I wish people wouldn't downvote just because they disagree -.-
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:39 AM
2

I'd like you to go to the graves of millions of male war dead, and hundreds of thousands of men dead from trying to support their families in dangerous jobs, and tell them how much more privilege they had then the women in their lives. ...or go to the graves of the exclusively male ruling class who sent those millions to die? I read this exchange as conflating the two. It reads this way not only because of the context of the original statement, but the using of the same situation of visiting a g…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:20 PM
1

Right, and the way you did that seemed to be a statement claiming that the first group of men were not under privileged - can you see why people would take it this way?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:07 PM
3

...Yeah, it is victim blaming. You framed this in such a way that conflated the 'ruling men' with 'men who die in wars', leading it to be read as if you mean to say that 'men (as a group) are responsible for these men going to war', and as these men are members of the group men they are responsible for their own victimization. I'm not saying you're deliberately victim blaming (you seem like a nice person) - but you are doing it.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:03 PM
1

If that's the way you read it sure, it doesn't come across like that to me, as I said it only seems to be arguing against ''all men have more privilege than all women all of the time'.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:56 PM
1

The comment about war dead is an argument against saying 'all men have more privilege than all women all of the time' (not that anyone has said that), not an argument against male privilege in general.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:37 PM
3

You didn't point out that the ruling class had more privilege than women - you deliberately conflated the groups of 'ruling men' and 'men who die in war' (usually poor, under educated, minority men), and used this to claim that the men who die in war must have more privilege than the women who emotionally blackmailed them to go. It's bullshit victim blaming. Saying that women being paid less is indicative of some general trend of discrimination against all women is fucking asinine. Oh wait, no i…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:31 PM
2

Contrast with: So yes. That man who's lungs were ruined by mustard gas belonged to a class (men) who had more privilege than the women who shamed him into enlisting. See the problem? You're arguing the point from Speaktothesky: The guy who got drafted into war, stabbed in the kidney by a bayonet, and died a slow death in a ditch, totally had more privilege than a woman who may have encountered challenges to becoming a doctor. And when you respond the way you did it is a claim that because the ma…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:17 PM
6

It is victim blaming if you try to minimize the oppression of men by saying things like: ...or go to the graves of the exclusively male ruling class who sent those millions to die?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:27 PM
2

Seriously? Accepting that men as a group are more privileged than women as group. Stating that the man in question belongs to a group with more privilege does not mean he has more privilege. Really. He could be poor, a PoC, and uneducated, while she could be a rich, white, highly educated women - his membership of a group with more privilege is not the defining factor you make it out to be in your response. If you had said 'he was a member of a group (men) that have on average more privilege tha…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:25 PM
3

And apparently you haven't heard of intersectionality. Or think that it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:06 PM
10

Conversely the existence of a male dominated power structure is not evidence that men have more (or less) privilege than any other group. Many men have a literal 0% chance of every being part of the dominant power structure, thus the fact that the power structure is only men is irrelevant to their privilege. If one wishes to claim that a group has more or less privilege than another then you're going to have to play oppression Olympics. I have beliefs about this subject, but I can not say with c…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:04 PM
3

Personally I think that gendered violence is one of the biggest issues that has be addressed, men are the majority of victims of gendered violence. Men are the majority victims of nearly all violent crime, with exceptions for domestic violence and rape (notably there are studies which show that rape may well be much closer to parity than has previously believed (the recent CDC study), and there is a lot for work on domestic violence and possible gender symmetry). Men are the majority victims bec…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:37 PM
1

As someone who was 'sexually charged' at the age of 6 I think that you're generalizing a bit much - some people go through puberty very early and some people have sexual desires and fantasies very early. I had started puberty before I was 6, so it's not true that all 6 year olds are 5-8 years away from puberty.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter