TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BanalityOfMan Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by BanalityOfMan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-20

So I guess, no. Nobody believes that. I don't even know if the dude who posted it is obese, although it is a statistically safe bet. Guess I pissed off some dudes who don't see penis when they look down. Who am I being toxic towards exactly?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 05:08 AM
-26

he’s helping people help themselves and preventing crime at the same time No he isn't? Because it was a joke? Because of basic logic? You think a model chick wouldn't molest a teenager because she just didn't think any of the old lonely men in her life wouldn't sleep with instead? Do you really believe that some gorgeous 25 year old is going to message him with "Oh thank you so much, I don't have any old guys leering at me on a day to day basis that I could bang! I wanna bang old creeps, but the…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 03:29 AM
21

Trauma from your hands having been destroyed from getting high fives?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 02:12 AM
8

Pathetic just doesn't have the same allure as taboo, I'm afraid.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/22 02:12 AM
21

Roflmao. I am able to derive full pleasure with my circumcised dick. No you aren't. You just don't know what full pleasure is. If you really didn't hate women, you would say both practices are disgusting and need to stop. But, your motive is transparent. You are retarded. I want no genital mutilation for anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 01:42 AM
18

If the foreskin was really that bad, nature should've taken care of it a long time ago. That is a brilliant angle that I never thought of. Having infected genitals would be a huge evolutionary filter. They would eventually lose function as well as be repulsive when partners were considering mating. Assuming that you didn't die from an infection and lack of antibiotics for most of history.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 01:08 AM
15

You haven't explained why. Both are surgical disfigurements of children for the purpose of decreasing sexual pleasure. Yeah, they have fundamentally different genitals being of different sexes, but beyond that fact they are nearly identical.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:46 AM
16

Just on face value it absolutely is. It is ritual disfigurement for the purpose of lessening sexual pleasure. Neither surgery removes the ability to reproduce. Would I rather be circumcised as a man than suffer FGM as a woman? Absolutely. Are they fundamentally different? No.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:07 AM
26

I'm not Googling shit. You can provide evidence for your claims or they can be ignored. What an ironic thing to say when you clearly don't know shit. Can you get phimosis and things with a foreskin that you probably won't without one? Yes, rarely. Should we cut off ears because they can get infected too?
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:05 AM
27

Because circumcision by nature causes no harm whereas FGM does. Circumcision is still ritual disfigurement, and the foreskin is the most nerve dense part of the penis. It is very much akin to removing the clitoris, although significantly less severe in outcome.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:57 PM
34

Pure ignorance. Most countries don't circumcise infants by default. The foreskin is the most nerve dense part of the penis as well. We have circumcision in the USA because of religious assholes like Kellogg. Same exact reasoning as is behind FGM as well...stop kids from masturbating.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:55 PM
3

Why was her suitcase outside if she was inside in a nightgown?
/r/seduction02/01/22 12:14 AM
51

Wow. Creepy.
/r/seduction10/10/21 05:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter