TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BandemicBuffering Archive

View 0 posts and 329 comments by BandemicBuffering on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol blocked
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:23 AM
0

Oh look, 80/20 theory proven with an OLD survey at work in a blue pilled woman who swears otherwise. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:16 AM
5

The historical context you cited works against your own argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:07 AM
1

And you still prove my point with "whining'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:04 AM
2

Same as who I replied to. Skipping over the pot for the kettle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:27 AM
1

And yet you called it whining, proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:22 PM
1

Nope, you still prove my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:14 PM
1

You are, and continue to do so with every comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:45 PM
1

Nope. Still proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:43 PM
1

Nope. Calling any of it whining proved my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:41 PM
1

Hyper anything is the traits expressed to an extreme that becomes a detriment. You didn't point to where I expressed him being my idea of anything. The hard concept indeed because you still can't grasp.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:41 PM
1

Point to where I said MY idea of masculinity is Tate. I'm not the person who brought his name in the discussion that you weren't a part of. Yeah you're the emotional one. And not particularly smart either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:38 PM
1

You're on here reaching into my discussion with someone else about a Dollar Store of Tate, whoever that may be, being hypermasculine/toxic. HYPERmasculinity, or femininity, is not good, period. He obviously wasn't masculine enough if he didn't teach you to assess what you're running into, and instead act on emotion for a back & forth you're not even part of.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:31 PM
1

Yeah it is pussy. You're just upset your daddy is being discussed and not worshipped. I bet your masculine ass wouldn't dare act this tough in person so fuck outta here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:24 PM
0

Again, why do you lack understanding that the prefix hyper- is connotative of a detriment? Hyper = detrimental. Toxic = detrimental.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:22 PM
2

Why do you lack understanding that the prefix hyper- is connotative of a detriment?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:20 PM
1

No. Calling it whining proved my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:49 PM
1

No you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:47 PM
1

Knowledge of mere existence =/= acknowledging its issues or affect on offline society.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:42 PM
1

Nope. People use that exact rhetoric to dismiss issues of OLD, and you're still pretending OLD doesn't influence IRL socialization, specifically between sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:32 PM
1

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:21 PM
1

This half of the data gets disregarded regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:18 PM
2

Then be concerned with your sistren as most men have observed it multiple times in real life. The fact that you don't believe it is typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 08:14 PM
1

It's not the only option but makes up half of the origin stories of modern couples and its practices have been adopted in "regular" dating strategies. A minority of the manosphere reviles OLD. Assuming we're talking about mentor types with platforms, most encourage men to maximize their profiles as another tool, but prioritize IRL meeting. If we're talking about ground level guys who follow it, many will take issue with OLD because they're, by design, unsuccessful at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 07:05 PM
2

Most women have dated/are dating/would date a Great Value edition of Tate via IRL interaction where whatever toxic/hypermasculine traits makes her "feel something".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 06:47 PM
2

Shit it has become indeed... In these last 15 years...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 06:33 PM
1

Heavy-headed but not invalid. Online behavior has been integrated IRL for a bit now. In-person scenarios defrost some of the barriers of ice, but they still exist to be navigated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 06:12 PM
1

The OP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 05:45 PM
1

OP is strictly exemplifying an OLD experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 04:46 PM
1

In 15 years changes happen...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 03:57 PM
1

Where was this said?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 03:56 PM
1

They aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 03:43 PM
1

Those things aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 04:12 PM
1

As usual women project their reality/nature and believe it must apply to all. You cannot project high selectivity onto the half of the species that must initiate everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 05:51 PM
1

Sounds like you just want to "flip the script" instead of actually saying something substantial. The block feature is a wonderful tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:06 AM
7

No there aren't. Wake up 🤷🏾‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:03 AM
6

Which is easier to do when you're larger than 99% of your species.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:23 AM
5

No there aren't, Chad's Mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:19 AM
2

We don't have to spare anything. It's the reality. If black pill is a lost cause then why do you keep talking to them? Lol don't bother saying anything either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:11 AM
0

Dad bods are the overall package of girl inches.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:49 AM
–

Usually not feminine looking. Take whatever handful of heartthrobs assorted by background/ethnic leaning preferences and imagine a Great Value version.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:37 PM
–

They think they do until they have to put in work to get or keep his interest, or flat out get too insecure to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:36 PM
–

Our thresholds for "unkempt" are simply different. Women now want their equivalent in male beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:49 PM
1

They are, but it still should be shown. It's not about misleading but illustrating a picture. With all you said, there's still a threshold that's considered "normal".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:01 PM
1

You're a joke, but you aren't joking. Let the shit burn. Blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:24 AM
0

Submit to women's words. Wipe y'all out. Lol. Fuck outta here. Another one blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:21 AM
5

Well of course, that's what the age bracket in polls/surveys are for. But "adult" means 18+. If they did age brackets I'm sure we'd get a clearer picture. 18-34, 35-49, 50-64, 65+ would tell a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:58 AM
2

They don't do it specifically for that reason. I'm not the one moving goalposts here. You said one gender does it, without reason. Both genders do it, reason is irrelevant to the absolute statement you made. False. Black women were the only women who nearly completely (90%) shut down Trump. White/Hispanic/Asian women were 51/46/40% respectively, so I guess instead of one shade in particular doing it, every but shade but one voted against their own interests. Sounds like gender roles need to evol…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:35 AM
1

Their nature will nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:55 AM
8

Elders are holding the numbers up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:53 AM
2

It doesn't matter at all, you brought up something that both genders do to make it about one gender. Men aren't upset with those things in a vacuum. They're upset that those things are used as reasons to look down on men when you asked for the same opportunity as us. Women asked for equality, accomplished it, then started complaining that men don't have/do/are more than them...and that has led to a great chunk of women voting that same administration in, as they skipped right over a woman becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:31 AM
1

I think the abundance of options and lack of options would have to be pretty extreme on each side for this to be generally true. Men's upbringing and adolescent-level experience with women add many shades of gray.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:05 AM
2

The reason doesn't matter. They do it, men do it. Nobody's upset at you succeeding at anything. Another misandrist arguing to argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:43 PM
2

You were saying something without saying it, instead of just saying it. I obviously picked up on it if I identified what you meant with my question. It doesn't change it, but it takes away the gender assignment you gave to the act.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:59 PM
3

But you did in fact try to be subtle lol. As much as the right works for billionaire agendas, that isn't what moved men in the red. A bunch of women, especially of a certain shade, voted against their best interests as well. Here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:34 PM
-1

And I literally don't understand that the modern matrix of dating and mating is caused by what women asked for yet don't fully want. A 30+ man wanting virgins has other issues. Like I said already, I don't care what extreme people do. Let me use a dominatrix as the example of what all of you are and watch how quick you'd be to tell me it's not all women. Because it isn't, even if y'all get your attitudes from sex work culture anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:45 PM
-1

How old are you and these men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:27 PM
1

You think the majority of people haven't had boyfriends/girlfriends since their mid-teens? Lol You asked for an answer and got it. I have you MY answer and prefaced with it being personal. I don't care about what extreme people have done. You're jumping to conclusions and putting words in my mouth because I never called anybody a 304 nor was I the first to use the term at all in this thread. A woman used the term first. You never wanted an answer other than what you already believe. Edit: Your t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:57 PM
0

What exactly is pro-billionaire? Are you trying to say voting for the right, without saying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:52 PM
-2

My thing is you as a woman have likely been dating since your mid teens. At 32 my realistic "market" is 25+. Let's say tomorrow boy meets 30 y/o girl. Having somewhere between 5-10 partners is fine. Low teens means you probably tried a 304 phase but you ain't built like that. Whatever. After a count of 15, in 12-15 years of sexual activity, there was something going on in your past that suggests I shouldn't try to be serious about a LTR with you. Either you never really had LTRs, which I expect …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:48 PM
0

You again lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:46 PM
1

It's a silencing tactic as people can't take a man expressing his dilemma. It's shut up, man up, and sign up for the social contract as you're supposed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:29 PM
0

There are plenty of continents between virgin and 304s. If the women in your family think in extremes like you to justify misandry, then yes, those guys did a good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:25 PM
-2

How have men voted against their own self-interests?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:13 PM
3

If you've lived to your age of a typical college/university graduate, your male counterparts do not want virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:12 PM
–

Okay...and?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:09 PM
2

Sounds too low
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:23 PM
1

Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 07:22 PM
1

Ditto.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:42 PM
1

And all 3 have or are being implemented as part of the adjustment phase. You're arguing just to argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:41 PM
1

Acknowledging how the world works =/= shut the fuck up and deal because half of us benefit and you don't. Especially when the world just recently started "working" this way, at least to this extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:37 PM
–

Or to stop participating, which is starting. Why exactly do you consider yourself red pill when you make blue pill arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:26 PM
–

Again, it's a response and adjustment period to women socially having their cake and eating it too with the accomplishments of third/fourth wave feminism. Half the species cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:21 PM
–

It's not "on them", it's a response and adjustment period to women socially having their cake and eating it too with the accomplishments of third/fourth wave feminism. Women weren't spending a decade of adulthood fucking alphas until recent years. 30-40 years of socioeconomic and sexual liberation is a blip in the grand scheme.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 06:16 PM
–

It was passable until men found the ability to compare notes (the Internet).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 05:48 PM
38

This sounds like justification rather than disproving.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 03:51 PM
–

Young men believe the degree of hypergamy being practiced today is new, not the idea itself. Between this and the barrier of entry to relationships being much lower when women were more economically dependent on men in an economy where one income supported a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 11:55 PM
–

Tired of seeing this LARP slop lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 11:53 PM
–

Absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 02:16 AM
1

I don't insist on anything. Men didn't ask for anybody's role to change. Women did. Men just deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:55 AM
1

No, everyone does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 12:34 AM
1

Men don't want to do anything because women have chosen their gender roles on an a la carte basis and leave us in a position of being a financial utility while A) Living in a late capitalist society that has turned 95% of the population into wage slaves and unable to comfortably live up to the standard, and B) Receiving the traditional "exchange" of their financial utility on a negotiable basis instead of the consistency we're expected to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:49 PM
2

It doesn't have to happen though, therefore chiding men for not policing other men's romantically successful behavior is a futile effort to inspire another futile effort that also changes nothing. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 06:35 AM
2

It does. Bad men will always exist. Women don't have to choose them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 02:10 AM
4

The point is nullified by what I said. Bad men will always exist. You don't have to choose them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:36 PM
4

Bad men will always exist. You don't have to choose them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:31 PM
1

Irrelevant. Yes. And blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:47 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:41 PM
6

So you're one of the women OP referenced
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:12 PM
0

Lol...no...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:07 PM
2

Is this really a red pill point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:32 AM
0

Red pill is hated because it goes far beyond the 3 simpleton ass bullet points presented in dealing with female nature men in observe and/or experience time and time again in spite of mainstream talking points revolving around specific personality traits and financial provision. Doing so creates a portion of men who take their ball and go home.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 01:40 PM
1

Which renders gender irrelevant. However, men are more inclined to physical activity/resistance training to stay in better shape longer. We also don't rely on makeup. So, if you're doing "especiallies" for those who aren't in their prime at 60, it wouldn't be men that the "especiallies" apply to.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 01:34 PM
1

Now if we're doing "especially", it wouldn't be the man this applies to.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 12:22 PM
15

Even in good health a man's prime is not 60.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:58 AM
3

It's not about being on the same literal tier as a DiCaprio, it's about carrying your romantic life in the same manner with women on a tier reasonable enough for that man to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:06 PM
0

That flair is flairing with this comment...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:37 PM
1

That's off income alone and even the scarcity of that varies by that person's locale. All things considered Jack isn't a Top 10%er.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:50 AM
1

For births? Or existing men? There's 97 men for every 100 women in the US. We're outnumbered by women in 40 states. Most Western countries have this while the East (esp. China/India) leans the other way and balances the planet 101/100.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:30 AM
1

Men's dating value is essentially quintiles that can be grouped into different zones. Top 20 have the most success, with the Top 10% being the most blatant/extreme. Next 20% are above average and "should" have success, have to work a bit more but generally can do decent in dating, particularly serial monogamy. Middle 20% aren't having much success at all with serial monogamy, usually have to jump through hoops to get it, are the common victims of dead bedroom marriages as they bargained to get t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:25 AM
–

More like we know a modern woman only has a limited amount of resistance before giving into a copious amount of pursuit/sexual advances. Men finding one's woman attractive has never been a downside at any point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:43 PM
1

The country has left (boys who became/have to become) men behind and this, on top of ethnic identity (and tampering), are the reason why we are where we are. As someone pointed out WW over 40 delivered the Oval Office back to Trump. Even if they don't care for him, they didn't believe a Black woman was going to do anything for their sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 09:12 PM
1

"Not a single fuckboy" not getting caught is an extreme. A portion of them will be known as womanizers but it won't be nearly enough for 80,000 people to sit there and know all of those few hundred by name/face, especially since that total number accounts for all age groups. People's social groups especially today are not that large and an 80K population isn't exactly small.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 09:05 PM
1

"Revolving around what the other gender finds attractive" is part of my point. At a certain point either side is bad for either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:43 PM
1

In ~30~years that's hard to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:40 PM
1

Your last two sentences kept me from giving you a decent response. You're too biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:40 PM
9

More people than just you? Of course. Still the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 05:32 PM
7

You asked what's wrong with it. I told you. If you are the profile of person you're describing, that's fine. I'm speaking on society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 05:26 PM
3

The other person asked "what's wrong with it", i.e. the cons. Your view is not wrong per se but idealistic. At a certain point in life, the cons outweigh the pros for both genders, one moreso than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:49 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:34 PM
1

👍🏾
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:16 PM
5

Alright sis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:12 PM
4

Which means it wasn't part of rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 02:11 PM
7

Threat profiling was not always a part of rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 01:56 PM
15

At a certain age and stage of life it is expected that you have found at least one person who had the same attraction to you and you did to them, however shallow or deep, or (especially for men) you have enough social awareness to procure an adult experience that somewhat verifies your attractive traits, even if he's not especially attracted to the hypothetical woman of the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 01:50 PM
1

Then society needs to stop turning men into pariahs for lack of sexual success or family-building.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:21 PM
1

We know...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 11:03 AM
8

Lol @ sexy OF models being the standard. The irony of projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 05:15 PM
4

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 02:58 AM
1

It's cool but not economically feasible as a long-term solution for 90% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 05:19 PM
–

Neither is food or shelter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:48 PM
1

My guy, I'm going to copy and paste my previous post because you have no actual argument other than what you want to believe. A literal stat has told you of the sexual imbalance but you wanna talk about "nope". They aren't relevant because, again, we are not talking about legal marriage and polygamy, we are speaking on casual flings and sex. Women have more sexual options and are currently having more sex than men. This is not debatable. Again, women have proven time and time again that they don…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 02:47 AM
2

It's not 1:1 because harems exist. It does not go against the percentage at all. I don't care what you're buying. Most men have 6> partners because they do not fit the bill of what I'm speaking on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:51 AM
1

They aren't relevant because, again, we are not talking about legal marriage and polygamy, we are speaking on casual flings and sex. Again, women have proven time and time again that they don't require that heavy of an investment of resources in men they find attractive enough post-sexual liberation. Most men will give a little and there to 2+ women if it's feasible. Everything you're trying to argue with me applies to a majority of men. I'm not speaking on the majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:47 AM
2

It doesn't matter what percentage I say as you won't believe it. You keep trying to form a 1:1 ratio for women sleeping with men in ONS or casual flings when it doesn't work that way. The sexual liberation of women ended that. Roughly 20% of young women are sexually inactive vs 30% of men. It's not high because the men who fit this bill do not need dating apps in the first place. 10% of guys...30% of women...for casual flings that require little to no emotional labor or financial provision due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:11 PM
1

Nobody is talking about wives or legal polygamy. We're talking about casual flings. Women have proven time and time again that they don't require much money or labor from men they find attractive enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:06 PM
1

They are not less than 1% unless using a stringent criteria which you want to impose on the concept. I simply said 10-20%, which is implied to be the Top 10-20%. The Top 1% is its own level. Many people (esp. women) have ONS. This is just as much conjecture as you claim to be pushing back on. I see you don't believe it and that's why you don't know what's going on. One out of every 5 men having more than 2-3 women to call/text for sex in a casual fling a couple of times a week is very realistic.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:55 PM
1

It isn't. 10-20% of men having large harems is what's happening. Matter of fact, a stranger can be a ONS. It doesn't have to be an ongoing situation..that's in addition to the top level of men holding harems. The second paragraph ignores that there is a gender gap in sexual activity that is in fact studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:45 PM
5

There are a bunch of bitter men running through women as we speak. They are attractive enough to offset it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:34 PM
1

There's nothing logistically impossible about it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:32 PM
–

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:16 PM
–

No we don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:08 PM
2

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 01:08 AM
0

17/21 = .8095...which is why you don't bet on 17.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:35 AM
4

Date women and see how that works out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:48 PM
-1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:03 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 03:38 AM
1

And a great deal of young men have no dating experience because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 03:17 AM
1

The elites have engineered a gender war, in combination with spiking COL, to solidify wage slavery into a new feudalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 02:55 AM
1

I addressed the difference in that vs online possibilities in the rest of the comment that you're chose to ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 02:41 AM
1

You're absolutely right, because that's based on a logical leap YOU took in this thread to say "if they're all single they must have always been single and that's ridiculous". The fact is that they are in fact single. It's irrelevant to an unprecedented number of young men being single. There is a stat in the same study saying 45% of men 18-25 (eliminating the earliest Zoomers who are close to me) have never made an approach on anyone for a date. This is the EXACT group I spoke on being a decade…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:49 PM
1

That's what YOU think lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:20 PM
1

Yes. It reflects stories on the ground. You have your own bias evident by the fact you ignored the social changes I've highlighted over the last 15 years just to say "oh well it's not enough data so I'm not convinced".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:00 PM
-1

Yet it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:44 PM
1

It does reflect...you said most...70% is still most...if you're in a room of 20 women and 14 of them are in a relationship, that fits the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:38 PM
-2

If you're not convinced you don't want to be convinced 🤷🏾‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:35 PM
2

That comment is flawed to me because it hyper-focuses on the marriage and cohabitating aspect, expands that stats to the census data which doesn't categorize by age, and then dismisses the idea of women being married to older men. If a 27F is married to a 33M that explains some of the gap technically even if it's socially normal. Take your experience from however many years ago that was, and give it a force multiplier. My sub-gen of boys were kinda the last to have those Wolfpack rituals of hitt…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 08:34 PM
3

60% of men under 30 being single is not unbelievable. The thing is, you'll see the random couple out and about and assume that's the overwhelming majority. Most average men are unremarkable and unnoticed by their female counterparts. The men you DO notice out and about, you'll assume they have someone because of whatever positive trait you identified. 40% is still large enough to somewhat act as a societal veneer especially since we're biologically wired to procreate and socially trained with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 07:25 PM
0

False.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 05:07 PM
2

The problem is the majority of women already don't pay attention to the majority of men. Women are already sharing a certain percentile of men (mostly) wittingly and (less so) unwittingly and have come to shadow agreements about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 12:54 AM
0

Wut
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:24 PM
1

At a certain age/stage of life this becomes statistically irrelevant and is a strawman argument used against the idea that a woman on the opposite end of the sexual spectrum is largely undesirable in LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 08:53 PM
2

We are at a point of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" as American men because the other half of the species is allowed to do/be whatever they want or need while we must constantly figure out how to embody traditional markers of provision and security while talking and moving under a progressive codebook. "Be what we say when we say for you to be it" is too taxing of a game to play.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 11:21 PM
2

I've said in other spaces that humans are animals that are a bit too smart for our own good.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:31 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 09:28 PM
-1

Life is complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 09:27 PM
3

I'm not strictly talking about looks. Since I've been advised that this is your MO, this is our last exchange before being blocked. The fact of the matter is, the vast, vast majority of women desire a man to be the top in categories that are, by consensus, found attractive in a man. Whether physical, mental, financial, social, etc. That can happen in a social ecology that does not involve national and international fame, AKA celebrity status. The real hate comes from you due to the fact that men…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:25 PM
4

What they really hate is men gaining any knowledge or understanding of the dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:07 PM
6

I said 8 out of 10 in categories. There are actual celebrity men that aren't an 8 out of 10 in all typically assigned categories of attractiveness. You taking that comment as hate is in fact hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:01 PM
3

Except I didn't. Extrapolating that from what I did say is in fact hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 07:51 PM
5

Lol at this being hate. Proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 07:45 PM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 07:16 PM
2

Do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:49 PM
4

If you feel like men should leave women alone, you wouldn't have made this post at all
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:46 PM
6

Lol at this being hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:43 PM
2

That's exactly what we're doing and you're complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:43 PM
2

We've been told to stop bothering you...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:35 PM
1

In the 21st century, outside of the religiously devout, sex predates exclusivity and commitment by far. It's much less "eventual" and more "are we proceeding forward or not?" You keep trying to hyperfocus on sexuality to paint a picture about other men when sexual access and fondness of one another aren't these mutually exclusive factors you're making them out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:27 PM
1

You refuse to understand that trying to explain your logic of exclusivity does not erase the fact that in the 21st century sex precedes the exclusivity stage of a relationship. Therefore there is no need for me to keep bringing new arguments when your mind is already set on what is right and wrong. YOU can stop if you wish, because: In the 21st century, outside of the religiously devout, sex predates exclusivity and commitment by far. It's much less "eventual" and more "are we proceeding forward…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:24 PM
1

In the 21st century, outside of the religiously devout, sex predates exclusivity and commitment by far. It's much less "eventual" and more "are we proceeding forward or not?" You keep trying to hyperfocus on sexuality to paint a picture about other men when sexual access and fondness of one another aren't these mutually exclusive factors you're making them out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:17 PM
1

I'm going to reuse a previous post until you're able to understand. In the 21st century, outside of the religiously devout, sex predates exclusivity and commitment by far. It's much less "eventual" and more "are we proceeding forward or not?" You keep trying to hyperfocus on sexuality to paint a picture about other men when sexual access and fondness of one another aren't these mutually exclusive factors you're making them out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:12 PM
1

Sex is a priority because it happens before exclusivity and commitment. Sex and compatibility are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:06 PM
1

Me saying that sex is part of the equation makes dating about sex? Are you sure this is a man typing with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:28 PM
1

In the 21st century, outside of the religiously devout, sex predates exclusivity and commitment by far. It's much less "eventual" and more "are we proceeding forward or not?" You keep trying to hyperfocus on sexuality to paint a picture about other men when sexual access and fondness of one another aren't these mutually exclusive factors you're making them out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:20 PM
–

When I mean dating I mean dating. You believing what you just said means everything lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:13 PM
–

I'm absolutely positive it's the other way around. Men do not have an issue dating on their level.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:08 PM
–

There is no problem...except average women are not satisfied with their counterparts. Your friends represent a minority, but let's see how many of the male friends are complaining about dead bedrooms after the goal (house/kids/security) is obtained...THEN that satisfaction is true or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 04:43 PM
–

Your assumption is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:52 AM
–

If this is the case, then those aspects that men are told to focus on need to be dialed back a point or two in relevance. The problem is women won't do so and will continue to expect a man to be an 8/10 or better in all categories. Specifically about fitness, men should be doing that for their own health/capability with desirability as a shadow reason, since after all, we are not entitled to women...or so I hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:45 AM
2

So do women...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 12:14 AM
1

Patriarchal shaming is the reason men are still pushed to play a game they can't win lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:48 PM
2

Some of them probably are. The rest are dating older men which the stat isn't about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 12:35 PM
1

Women are too afraid of men to be vulnerable enough for consistent orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 11:56 AM
1

Just an example of the turnt tables...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 09:55 PM
2

I agree. Next time I get pressured as a man to get married I'll present this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:25 AM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:54 PM
2

We don't have the opportunity to be...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:26 PM
–

And this is a mod? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:01 PM
1

We know
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 07:51 PM
–

L O L
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 09:43 PM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:48 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:46 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:39 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:27 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:49 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:33 AM
1

The title of your post is how to change the dating market. You clearly are looking for a change in women to make this shift. Therefore the change in women is the primary desired effect. If you wanted to make a post about men's well-being you would have done that. Stick to your own argument if you don't want to go around in circles. This is my last original response. Anything else will be this copied.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:25 AM
2

You spoke on women having no incentive to change in order to shift the dating market. Therefore you care about whether they change as a primary response to your suggested action.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:03 AM
3

This is not the main point and goes against your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:59 AM
5

Which will do nothing in the dating market you named in your title/OP. Women do not care about your own self-respect if you're invisible to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:43 AM
10

Your point does nothing. Removing the first right of refusal doesn't solve the issue. As I said, those same complaining women are still fucking someone. They may not get the ring and the contract from who they're dealing with, but exploring sexual/dating market options will not be an issue for the average woman. These same women will also complain about men not doing right by women. They punch up sexually and believe that's their level for LTR. Men at large opting out isn't the equalizer you thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:40 AM
26

Yes, because they're missing out on is a dopamine hit from being able to see their options literally walk up to them. They want the first right of refusal. I'd bet the same women complaining about men not approaching, are still sexually active.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:32 AM
21

Women at large don't like men at large enough for this to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 03:36 PM
0

Boomers are already grandparents and will largely be gone. That post is oddly enough for the first 1/3 or so of Millennials and maybe the last couple of years of Xers. Like the guy who decided to hit the magic MOD button on me because he knew he was talking caveman bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 06:42 AM
1

No ignorance waxing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:44 PM
–

Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:40 PM
0

"Nothing should have changed" is where the argument falls apart. That's not how society works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:32 PM
2

We have an idea how it'll be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:31 PM
2

That, but also when their sons are finally old enough to struggle. Or their daughters go too long without finding "the right one" to give them grandchildren. 2010 was 15 years ago and last week at the same time. The year 2040 will tell A LOT.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:22 PM
2

It isn't coddling. If you're not sure what changed you should pay more attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:16 PM
2

There is a generational divide. Men 40 or older on the "tough luck kid" wave.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:37 PM
1

👍🏾
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:12 PM
0

You're a woman, of course they're not shallow to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:08 PM
1

Says more about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:51 PM
1

The shallow category envelopes a majority of women alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:00 PM
2

At 31 I have verbal/online sparring sessions and battles with guys older regularly on this topic. Most can't understand the post-Instagram/Tinder dating matrix.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 12:23 AM
1

Yes, as a form of minutiae to get away from the overall point. We can do this for any part of the body or clothing to ignore the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:40 PM
1

Again, hygiene is not limited to hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 06:21 PM
1

The point that the other male poster was making, that I latched onto, is that a man can be in any given space and judged as unhygienic when he may have worked a very dirty job and hasn't been home yet. Washed hands are not the only metric of hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 05:17 PM
2

"It's hard to imagine that the human species has changed so very much in one generation." A FUCK TON of people have this issue. You're not alone. The effects of the Internet and social media is something people who didn't grow up intrinsically with them can't get or sometimes don't want to. A man born in 1975 has more in common with their 1925-born grandfather than his 1995-born son, particularly with dating. Historians and sociologists are gonna have a field day with the onset of the 3rd millen…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 04:17 AM
1

We shouldn't, but you chose that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:26 AM
1

I do that already. Learn how to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:18 AM
1

I do that already. Learn how to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:16 AM
1

No, I am not defending unwashed hands. Learn how to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:15 AM
1

Am I actually defending unwashed hands? Or have you just pivoted towards this argument because it's the most nebulous instance of the uncleanliness that men supposedly get rejected for?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:07 AM
1

Again, I didn't start the men work dirty jobs debate. You don't even know who you're responding to lol. A slightly better sense of smell allows you to smell unwashed hands after a trip to the bathroom? K9 Unit please.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:18 AM
2

Without female approval the species stops.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:10 AM
1

No, we are. I didn't start this sub-debate. You can smell people's hands when you look at men and call us dirty? You should join a K9 unit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:05 AM
0

But we're talking about the men who do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 04:53 AM
0

Every single woman in a hospital is not dealing with every single patient or child who happens to be vomiting, shitting or bleeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 12:01 AM
-1

Close contact with people with compromised immune systems =/= dirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:57 PM
–

1) Men are not women and women are not men. 2) No man over 21 actually wants a virgin outside of extremely religious people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:39 PM
1

I know for me, I don't feel like initiating a path that is very unlikely to lead to anything due to the expectations and desires that have been socialized into women. I'm confident I'm very far from alone in this sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:48 AM
1

A lot of dissonance going on in here...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 01:05 AM
–

They'll never admit it...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 04:22 AM
–

People take this too shallowly. It is not a surface talking point but the sentiment is baked in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:23 AM
0

Men say what they say because 90+% of the time, they are not receiving alimony/support. Women say it shouldn't matter because regardless of fidelity, the security net is of utmost importance. It's the reason marriage means everything to them versus long-term cohabitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 11:09 PM
–

I'm not understanding this 4B 4N talk...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:25 AM
1

There are valid points made but the wall is not "more relevant" to younger men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 05:13 AM
–

As a "grandfather" reason (the cause before the cause), I guess. The direct cause? As much as my mentality leans red/black pill, that ideology mixed with skin color is why Trump won.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 04:08 PM
1

Yes, we are. It is not one or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 08:12 PM
2

Whatever a terper is, thank you for admitting the myth is exactly that, and that they and women keep said myth alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 07:30 PM
2

Not false. We have still been programmed that other factors are "supposed to" override looks. And that's unnecessary, since many women end up doing it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 07:00 PM
1

The difference is that it was always known since Adam & Eve. Boys/men have been lied to about how important women find men's looks, and that importance has exponentially grown in the last 50 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 04:49 PM
7

Can't do any of that if you're not in the market
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 09:28 AM
11

Not a theory...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 09:27 AM
22

Which will never happen so it becomes immaterial
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 09:26 AM
34

Again, these men were already invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:19 PM
142

You can't reject more when you're not being admired let alone approached...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:46 PM
3

You were getting told this in the 90s? Damn...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 04:55 PM
1

Porn is a symptom not a cause...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 10:25 AM
–

This happens without a paternity test...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 06:50 PM
–

The fact that this is a debate is exactly why I'm not participating in either situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 06:49 PM
6

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 09:40 PM
2

Come on now...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 09:03 PM
0

Okay cool
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 09:02 PM
0

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 08:57 PM
1

I highly doubt that every single woman I've ever seen with natural faces were all still made up. You're doing far too much projecting to defend a particular status quo of A) All women wear makeup regardless, or B) All men are too shallow to like a woman without makeup. Choose one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 05:17 PM
1

I can't be certain in my own attraction level to a woman who does/doesn't do something specific? Lol okay
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:32 PM
1

You already told me that you disagree with my certainty in my attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:30 PM
1

You're asserting my own attraction level by deeming it unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:27 PM
1

Maybe, maybe not. Can you explain why you feel a need to assert to me my own attraction to women without makeup?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:23 PM
1

Absolutely. I'll be 31 in 6 days. I've seen plenty of natural-faced women that aren't related to me. I was simply giving background on where it comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:20 PM
1

Again, a behavioral and mentality standard. This is common for people to admire traits of their parents and seek it out in mates. How the hell are you going to tell me who I've found attractive without makeup? You do not know me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:41 PM
1

There's no more clarification needed. I said I prefer natural/lightly made up faces due to familial examples of it as a behavioral and mentality standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:33 PM
1

How could that be if you don't remember what my point is, which is also accessible by hitting "view parent comment"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:30 PM
1

If you need me to do that, then you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:11 PM
1

Irrelevant to my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:07 PM
1

It's worth the squeeze because even if the woman never comes, you're still better than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:58 PM
1

I understand that. The point is they don't apply makeup to present themselves as attractive to the world. They use their natural faces. It's a behavioral/mentality standard that was shown to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:02 PM
2

No, my issue is with you 1) singling out semen, and 2) choosing that to respond specifically to me when I said nothing about semen
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:51 PM
2

Yup, that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:47 PM
1

I don't have to be attracted to family members to be given an example of a woman not needing to create a different face to go out into the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:45 PM
1

I'm answering based on the "semen" rhetoric you came with. Again, I recognize how nature still shapes "civilized" humans because as smart as we are we're still a species of animal. Having those things doesn't negate nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:41 PM
5

You're taking an extremely individualistic and personal stance on this. A woman not wanting ANYONE'S semen has nothing to do with one man finding that no woman he encounters is attracted to him. What actually has helped me is understanding how much nature dictates human behavior even as we keep "evolving" and having modern codes and technologies shape our realm. The more things change the more they stay the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:34 PM
2

If none of you want my semen, it's possible that I'm less of a man. I'm being very serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:28 PM
2

This is true... people are disingenuous...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 12:36 PM
2

Growing up in a family of women who didn't/don't wear makeup like that, I know exactly what I'm saying lol. I'm accustomed to minimal or none, dealing with a literal two-face is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:44 AM
1

There's a lot of women in general who can use less or don't need it, but I wouldn't say this as a catch-all statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 03:43 AM
4

Powerful men think it's okay because they and their wives don't follow that programming...it's left for the Proletariats to kill each other by a thousand cuts. Kudos for seeing that the difference in old vs new masculinity is a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 12:17 AM
0

It is a big deal
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:44 AM
2

The men who think that way is a miniscule percentage, especially compared to the statement I made regarding a societal/cultural pillar of teaching boys/young men that personality traits, abilities and finance override physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:31 AM
2

Most men don't think that way though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 10:29 PM
3

So you're willing to have sex for the purpose of making children and nothing else, and be with that person for decades? Sounds miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 10:01 PM
4

It's still a strong plurality and no they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:47 PM
5

They aren't, and a third of young men is a strong plurality that speaks to a problem. It doesn't need to be 51% to be significant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:40 PM
5

First, most young men today in the country I'm in are not in relationships and a third are sexually inactive. So no. Secondly, even women are pragmatic enough to "settle" below their bar...or at least certain age brackets...seems as if today many are fine sharing who they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:17 PM
5

Then we need to stop being told that other things override attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 06:45 PM
2

Thanks to the effort of folks like you trying to raise them lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:51 PM
–

The person here with a respect and bitch status problem is again, you, who responded with the energy I expect from your "wife" instead of a near 40 year old man, and proceeded to start the name calling...lol. 98% of your activity is this subreddit...so I doubt you're actually having "success" in relationships. And no, you aren't teaching anybody anything before you even try to come with that angle because this ain't a teacher's disposition. Pretend all you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:44 PM
1

Reality on Earth-Two, not here
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:36 PM
3

When you think I'm perceiving your existence as a flex, you're the one who needs examination. You didn't need to respond to me to simply exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:33 PM
2

The person here with the skewed perspective is you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:31 PM
5

The only person here trying to flex is you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:28 PM
1

Yes really, that's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:24 PM
1

Women have consecutive mind-blowing orgasms from 4 inch machines...men's lack of knowledge is a much smaller issue than it's made out to be...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:20 PM
1

Good for you, you're the exception not the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:16 PM
3

A biological imperative is a big deal. Women do not like sex as much as men despite what you've been told. The vast majority of men have to pursue women for sex here on Earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:08 PM
3

No, it means it's not all encompassing of who/what a man is. If it weren't a big deal at all, neither one of us would be here going and forth because our fathers did not care enough to pursue our mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 09:21 AM
18

Pretending sex isn't a big deal is disingenuous. It's just not as big of a deal as it's made out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 04:22 AM
2

You consider saying "almost but not quite" to these options as high standards? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 03:29 AM
10

But we aren't though... that just says something about the women in the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 11:07 AM
8

The correct answer. The word "safe" in itself is nebulous in this question as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 11:00 PM
6

Says who?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:04 PM
2

Folks seem to have told you different already, but in my experience/observation, yes, women 5'3" and under are more expressive about wanting/needing a tall man. In the medium range of women (5'4-5'7), they kinda just care that you're taller than them. At 5'8+, as the women who actually "need" a tall man, some of them claim that right, but just as many somewhat surrender to how slim the pickings are and open up to men shorter than them, especially if they're approaching 6 feet themselves. All wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 05:13 PM
1

We don't do it significantly more than women, especially considering real life experiences in conjunction with online engagement and comments. I didn't tell you what to post. I told you that you're practicing cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:53 PM
1

Your post is about men in a forum concerning the relationship between men at large and women at large. If you believe it isn't that different, then trying to limit the conversation to just men in order to avoid fleshing that out is cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:45 PM
1

Yes they do. Again, is this really any different than men who get scaremongered about marriage and children by women and even other men? What place are those women and people coming from?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:38 PM
1

I'm not lost, nor do I have an issue keeping up. These men can't threaten any of these women when they don't know them and cannot influence how single or lonely they'll be.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:36 PM
1

Both clips have men critiquing women being promiscuous, there is a gap between promiscuity, and being a virgin. Men wanting something and requiring something, are two different things. But these guys, and many of the figureheads for the movement/label so to speak, speak in absolutes to get a point across. No man is requiring a woman to be a virgin with their age being 2X or better, as if they did, they'd destroy their chances of finding anybody. If you're going to try to use clips to prove me wr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:32 PM
1

Lol can you point me to comments where men "threatened" you with loneliness and misery? And can you also explain why you take it as a "threat" when those people supposedly don't mean anything to you and cannot influence such an outcome? Except, this isn't a discussion really. You shared an opinion under a guise of curiosity when the fact is you already have your beliefs that you don't want challenged. If I didn't want to engage, I would not be commenting. I don't have concerns with you, not the …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:21 PM
1

Pot meet kettle. This isn't a discussion at all because your mind is already made up. You sound worse than the men you're trying to critique and are making your own projections. Again, you are not curious about the psychology of men who make the comments they make when a man just told you why. We can go back and forth with 60,000 comments between you and I to see who will budge if you'd like.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:11 PM
1

You can make a comment of disbelief in a statement/sentiment. Men don't care about the potential end result of a woman being single and childless by age X. We, again, care about being the scapegoat for why a number of women end up that way, and comment saying not to do that. You can't be interested in the psychology of men if you're going to go back and forth with one giving it to you and denying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:53 PM
1

No, I have not. Point me to the redpillers requiring a grown woman to be virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:41 PM
1

And who are you to say whether or not men buy it or not, or are angry? You don't know them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:33 PM
0

Okay, that sounds pretty similar to men not buying women saying, "I am/I will be content remaining single and childless". See how this works?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:22 PM
1

This sounds like 1 person being used to reflect men at large. Redpillers never said there's something wrong with wanting sex, nor have they denied having standards of what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:21 PM
1

24 isn't necessarily a marriageable age in the 21st century. It's not that hard, you likely don't like the men who would be that person, i.e. the phrase "floppy simp". What exactly is a floppy simp? And what exactly is wrong with wanting sex? I've heard for the longest that women like sex as much as men. If you're young and sex-positive, what's the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:09 PM
0

It's less an attempt to scare and more of a "don't blame me later". Men who will say they're content being single or not focusing on finding someone are often told they're not real men so it goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:06 PM
1

Why should I or any man be joyous at providing for a woman who is my age and physical/attractiveness equal but doesn't actually view me as such?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:25 PM
0

No. There would have to be a concession that feminism in (Anglo-)Western society has made an overcorrection, or the cultural current that it has created would have to completely push forward and the "where are the real men" question vanishes with the expectation for contemporary men to act in a early/mid 20th century manner being set aside. Now which one of these is likely to happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:21 PM
1

Yeah let's act like there's no segment of women complaining that they can't the man/relationship/marriage they want and placing the blame on men instead of looking at what it is they claim to require...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:12 PM
4

There are areas of gray. Most women do not have this exact combination of traits, or beliefs that take an extreme, but a degree of what has been described is still present and presents a difficult time in dating or building relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:10 PM
1

People saying, "I see this number/my circle and average men have relationships/families".. None of this speaks to the dynamic of those relationships and thus doesn't dispute the opening post. Many relationships/marriages/families are built on women "settling" for the safe/reliable/average guy willing to provide security, waning physical/sexual intimacy as the security permeates, and resentment over the staunch fixture a legally binding union/children/mortgage presents. Merry Christmas.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:04 PM
1

Men are not marrying women they're not sexually attracted to get kids from them...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 11:43 PM
2

All these responses are quite telling. Women simply cannot wrap their heads around the fact that most men do not value degrees and salaries out of a female partner on the same level that they do out of a male partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 06:16 AM
1

Sex precedes LTRs in the 21st century 95% of the time...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:39 AM
–

Welcome to the year 2000.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 04:15 AM
1

Sounds like nobody wants to be talked to
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 10:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter