TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bannedfromfun Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Bannedfromfun on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The ex-wife is trying to copyright her ex-husband's suicide note in order to prevent it from being circulated on the internet. Yeah, like that's something that can happen.
/r/PussyPass26/04/14 08:05 PM
1

Well, she was drunk, so she was obviously unable to be answerable for her actions. But seriously, has three children at home and she has since taken counselling for substance abuse and anger management and continues to see a psychiatrist. Leniency of the court on this case was due to her having dependents. I guess it comes down to if they're her ex's kids too.
/r/PussyPass20/02/14 03:43 PM
0

Solution? Charge them after the fact.
/r/PussyPass06/02/14 05:06 AM
2

What the fuck. Just . . . . . how does this happen? Man, you think he could get some support from Feminists? I mean, he's a dad that wants to be involved with his kid, that's what they're all about, right? Seriously, this is about a guy not losing his kid, if there's support he can get from ANYWHERE he should go for it.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:33 AM
13

It's the seething anus of the internet, and really associating the MRM with 4chan is, like, the least politically smart thing you could do?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:00 AM
-5

But But But, Evo psyche so neatly dovetails with the conclusions I've already drawn, in a way that makes it seem normal or beneficial or innate! Fucking evo-psyche.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:16 PM
1

Fuck, I laughed. It hits that sweet spot of ludicrous, but correct, and just a little gauche to discuss openly - but nobody really disputes it.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:15 PM
2

Um, Silver Fox anyone?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:14 PM
1

Well, that's what the law says. It's being implemented to balance out previous inequalities, so as long as it's institutional it's not considered racist. Now, whether or not it's effective is debatable, as are specific situations where it's being employed and whether it's being employed correctly. Also, affirmative action applies to any discriminated group, so really calling it racist is an extremely narrow view. It's like golf, have you ever played golf? You know how you give someone a handicap…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:07 AM
8

I understand the idea behind approaching gender issues in the most abrasive and confrontational way, but it comes off as the male equivalent of Jezebel. Anybody on the fence about the MRM (as in, most people) is going to go there and be so turned off by the language and writing style that they're not going to pay attention to the articles themselves. It's a great feel-good read for someone who's entrenched in it, but . . . I mean look at this title alone This is how disgusting feminists really a…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:04 PM
5

Man. I get really disappointed at how AVFM posts such good quality, then shits all over it with vitriol.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:09 AM
3

IANAL, but I think lawsuit sums are often determined not by the magnitude of the transgression, but by how much money the defendant has. No, that is completely wrong. It's for damages incurred. Now, the amount sued for is often as high as they can make it, it sounds like in this case the class action suit is claiming damages to the amount of 31.9 mil. Whether or not anything close to that is awarded is going to depend on the courts decision.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:54 AM
-2

Pornography_save_li is obviously not a lawyer. When refer to matters of law, I would go with the professional opinion. This is the same sort of mealy mouthed denial Lawyers use. Being a lawyer on reddit must be the most hilarious, and painful thing to be at the same time. Firstly, because the behaviour of the CEO cannot be construed to be for the purpose of ameliorating discrimination, and secondly because she as an individual does not have the power to institute a lawful program that would allo…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:44 AM
2

Can I agree that this article belongs, but that we shouldn't turn it into a witchhunt about how one women is evil, but instead discuss how she was allowed to hide the money, follow how the courts act, and praise change if they come to a reasonable decision/decry the system if they fuck someone? Sorry, I just don't want this sub to copy the flaws of Feminism where they try to be so inclusive they can't call out the crazy in their ranks, or invalidate problems because they involve rich or white pe…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 03:00 PM
11

overanalizing . . . I'll accept it.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:35 PM
2

Woah, treat people like they have intrinsic value? Man, I hope that's not what government is for, because if so we've beeb doing it wrong. Glad someone got that my statement was tongue in cheek, although painfully true. I mean, I don't want a nanny state, but I feel a level playing field isn't too much to ask. I don't want affirmative action, period. For anyone. Of any sort. I simply want everyone to have truly equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:09 PM
3

Shit, I fail at keyboarding lol. Accidentally deleted my previous post about proctologists already doing this. Apparently, although the technique specifically described in the article for treating anal fissures is similar to the one used for cervical cancer, the efficacy has yet to be actually proven for using it to treat prostate cancers. So, essentially these people are performing an unregulated surgery that, yes, is technically outside their scope of practice. Serious business in the medical …
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:39 PM
-1

Pft, it's pretty good if you have money. I ain't going off the grid, I'm gonna go buy a nice truck. Go to Europe, do some traveling. You know, take some vay-cay to de-stress and unwind, hit up a swingers cruise probably. It only sucks to be judged on what you produce, if you don't produce much.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:14 AM
9

Most of them aren't actually. Just the most vocal ones, who are sadly the most likely to be active about it. Big Red & Valerie Solanases pretty much represent the female equivalent of TRP. It's just shitty how Feminism (political movement) is so determined to be inclusive when attacked from the outside, that Feminists defend people like them who have taken the complete batshit line of thought in Feminist theory seriously. Feminism (political movement). Feminist theory (academic concepts & terms)…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:01 AM
3

You mean benevolent sexism against women, not sexism against men.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter