TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Baramordax Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Baramordax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It could give a negative impression, sure, but why is it extremely disrespectful?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:16 AM
3

While it may vary from place to place, the general basis for punishment comes from the actual damage inflicted, and not potential damage that wasn't inflicted. Intentions have to be demonstrated through action as it otherwise would be considered punishing thought crime. In general I consider there to be three rough grades of accusations. Social accusations not involving law enforcement, but spreading in the social circle. Accusations involving law enforcement, but recanted/disproved at an early …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:34 PM
3

Yeah, I know. I was just thinking there's a difference between how successful you were in your false allegation. After all we care about it for murder, so why not care about it here? Also I think it helps to equate the idea of punishing false accusers with other scales of punishment. I think it's a hard pill to swallow for a lot of people if you claim all accusations, regardless of outcome for that accusation, should carry the same punishment the victim was facing.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:29 PM
3

I was thinking there is a difference between being accused and actually spending 30 years in prison vs an attempted accusation that either is dismissed or exonerated shortly after conviction. Just thinking a kind of distinction would be helpful here in terms of language. I don't know what "attempted rape conviction" should be called over the blanket term "false allegation" which serves to cover all degrees of success in the false allegation.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:15 PM
6

Just a minor comment on the punishment aspect. Not an agreement or disagreement on your stand, per se. Other places in the law we distinguish between just attempts and successful execution of wrongdoing. Attempted robbery vs actual robbery. Do you see an equivalent here?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:35 AM
13

Same IP also only proves same house, not same person.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:27 AM
1

Alright. Well, thanks for the input :)
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:24 PM
1

Not sure where I claimed the 5th was a law, but that's not important. You would obviously only be compelled to correct the mistake during the grace period where no prosecution would be possible. After that it would simply become a crime to not have pursued the correction during this grace period. I don't see how that is testifying against yourself which opens you up to prosecution.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:11 PM
1

Not my country :) However, to take your 5th into account, wouldn't it be a matter of how such a law was formulated? Could it not be something similar to Good Samaritan Laws where some make it a duty to offer assistance? In this case it would be a duty to correct the mistake by some given age. For instance it could be a small grace period after you gain the vote to come forward, and failing to do so then makes it a new crime to not meet your duty of correction? I'm not saying I'm an advocate for …
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:33 PM
3

While I agree that an 11 year old doesn't quite understand what they have done, an older version of that same person surely does. It does make me wonder if it would be reasonable to set an age at which point you would be considered obliged to correct the errors of young age, and not doing so would from that age on count as a crime.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:29 AM
1

And whether or not someone is a Jew is relevant when dealing with Muslim countries. It obviously possible for a Jew to have a completely unbiased perspective with regards to the Middle East, but it's equally obvious that having a Jew as Chief of Staff influences the interaction with Muslim countries because it gives an impression of bias, regardless of the validity of such. Whether or not it was reasonable to think it would lead to a more pro-Israel politic or not at the time can be debated, but…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:52 PM
1

Lets get the full context shall we? Also in December 2008, the Norwegian author and journalist Mona Levin claimed Kåre Willoch made an allegedly racist statement when his response to the question whether USA were likely to change their Middle East policy was: “It doesn’t look too good, because he has chosen a Chief of Staff who is a Jew, and, as we know, many American voters look much more to the Bible than to the reality of our days — and with a meaninglessly mistaken interpretation of the Bibl…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:16 PM
2

Thank you for clarifying :)
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:59 AM
3

Out of curiosity, what exactly is this series of lies you are referring to in this specific case?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:40 PM
2

I'm not talking about what specifically you should and should not do, so lets drop that speculation. I'm saying that if you have knowledge that choice A has higher risk than choice B and you knowingly still choose A then you are personally responsible for elevating the level of risk you are currently facing. "Locking your door" is avoiding the unacceptable risks that you know of. As to what specifically you should do in relations to risk, that requires an examination of what risks you face where…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 04:35 PM
4

I'm afraid I came up with two things you might call moral responsibility so please elaborate on your view of the moral responsibility arguments. I'm curious as to what you really mean here.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 03:14 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_for_rape I guess it's a starting point for what the motivation can be.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 03:03 PM
5

I realized my whole point didn't come across as well as I wanted. What I also wanted to point out is that both types of responsibilities need to be examined. This idea that if you talk about person responsibility you somehow take away the responsibility of the criminal or wish to prosecute any less is a logical fallacy, and quite frankly disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 11:58 AM
17

There are two types of responsibility here. One is the responsibility that concerns the criminal matter, rape, car theft and so on. This responsibility rests with the criminal 100%. The other kind of responsibility is that to yourself. This is the kind where your personal behavior exposes you to varying degrees of risk. This is usually the type where insurance companies come in. Lets take your example of someone stealing a car. If the owner of the car left the door open and the insurance company…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 11:48 AM
0

This is 100% impossible. If the accusation is false then conviction can never be true. You can however convict someone who got away from a different crime, but logically that doesn't make false -> true sound.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 04:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter