TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BarroomBard Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by BarroomBard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Well, it was either that, or he was staying home so the wife could falsely accuse him of rape. You have to get your daily dose of r/mr tropes, don't you?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 12:47 AM
9

Actually, no. The burden of proof is on the person making a claim, not on the person refuting it.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:31 PM
0

Discounts don't prevent people from using the business.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 07:35 PM
0

I believe that people should be allowed to vote with their dollars, but not to prevent others from doing so. In other words, the law should be on the side of freedom of consumption. If you are opening something as a business, I don't think you should have the right to prevent people from using your business unless their behavior is threatening to said business.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 05:37 AM
1

Fair enough, although I think the context of the thread was discussing what CAN be done, rather than what should be.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 05:07 AM
-4

I'm sorry to inform you, but here is the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964: TITLE IITITLE II--INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, and privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin. (b)…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 04:29 AM
2

See, I prefer women who would put out on the first date, but don't. It makes the first date more exciting.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:09 AM
2

"The average mother should be barefoot and pregnant, and always willing to follow her husbands decisions"? That one even has it's own biblical backing, but it's just not going to fly in modern society. True, but that one is also not clearly a joke.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 06:35 PM
4

Am I the only one who thinks that "flipping the genders" just so we can get butthurt about a joke is stupid?
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:57 PM
6

No, it's not ironic. It may not even be hypocritical. Always believing a woman who says she was raped is entirely self-consistent with never believing a man could be falsely accused. It is, however, incredibly shitty.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 03:03 AM
1

There really isn't a great deal of serious academic study regarding masculinity as distinct from human sexuality in general. There aren't any men's studies classes, because there is no such thing as a men's studies class.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 09:15 PM
-3

Yes, because the solution to any dangerous situation is to escalate...
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:55 AM
1

By 'can wear', we mean that, at most, a man is allowed to wear a tie to add a splash of color to his suit, which must consist of matching pants and jacket, over a white oxford cut shirt. The suit must conform narrowly to a limited range of styles and must be black, dark blue, or gray. A man's business attire may be accessorized by a watch, and sometimes by a small tie pin or cufflinks. By contrast, a woman must wear attire which fits into a wide range of colors and styles, from pantsuits to skir…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:19 PM
2

No one is arguing that ratty t-shirts, shorts and sandals are business attire. But look at it this way: these women are all professional looking business women. This is what business men look like. They are all wearing the same suit, the same colors, the same damn cut of clothing.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:12 PM
4

Exactly this. I see this same attitude so often here ("If you find society's rules restricting, it's your own fault for giving in to what people think.") It's so stupidly simplistic and anarchistic. We follow society's rules because that is the price for operating in society.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:04 PM
2

"Car Insurance so easy even a caveman could do it."
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:22 AM
12

Christianity became popular because the Emperor of the known world converted when he believed he had been given a sign that contributed to his military victory.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 05:11 PM
2

TIL Michael Crichton wrote a Young Adult book about sexual harassment...
/r/MensRights15/04/11 04:54 PM
3

Yes, nothing is stopping anyone, except that doing most of the things on this list will get a man arrested, fired, beaten to within an inch of his life, or at the very least shunned by polite society.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 04:36 PM
1

You know what we call people who absolutely refuse to go along with society? Whatever you want, because no one wants to talk to those losers. You can have all the "Whatever, I do what I want" you feel like, but the truth is, we are bound by the rules of the society in which we live, if we want to be allowed to participate in that society.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 03:32 AM
2

I (23 M) enjoy reading Cosmo because of how ludicrously smutty it is.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 03:39 AM
3

Better plan: have your prospective spouse read that thread, and base your decision on that.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:47 PM
4

To be fair, this troll actually states that children are not people and are merely property. She isn't anyone's "own".
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:45 PM
2

I read it as the lawyer somehow failing to get the videos in as evidence. There are a lot of rules that might tie something like that up.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 02:15 AM
1

I'm saying that, while she probably shouldn't have the right to hold this much control over OP's brother, the unfortunate fact of life is that she does, and the law fully upholds her right.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:17 AM
18

It's not that he's being advised to run from his responsibilities... it's that he has no legal options other than to submit to whatever she wants to do. If he wanted to keep the child and she didn't, the situation would be the same: there is nothing he can do. She has exactly the same level of responsibility in this situation, but she has 100% of the choice, 100% of the power, and 100% of the options.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:08 AM
6

But there is a significant selection bias between people who get a paternity test and those who think their child might not be theirs. Making the blanket statement that at least 20% of all children are born to a man who is not their biological father is as disingenuous and intellectually dishonest as the 1-in-4 statistic so often bandied by hardline feminists. Deliver a study, or stop spouting what "experts" say.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:42 AM
8

The problem is, she has every right to do this.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:33 AM
3

This exactly. r/MR gets trolled because we are a controversial, notorious subreddit, which means that we have more emotional investment in the image of the movement. It has nothing to do with feminism, and all to do with being an easy target.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:11 AM
1

That title had nothing to do with the article. Except for the open-ended questions in the last paragraph, she never comes close to talking about male misogyny in any way.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 10:39 PM
20

It wasn't criticism, it was childish name-calling. The rest of the article was well reasoned and well written, but the author only hurts his credibility with language like that. It's shit like that that makes it easier for people to sweep MRAs aside.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 09:07 PM
2

The only way these situations would be comparable is if the woman were approached by someone who said "I would like to rape you" and she replied "Go ahead." You wanna try to reframe your argument again, or are you running out of straw?
/r/MensRights13/03/11 10:46 PM
0

There's definitely an implication between those two paragraphs that she is cheating on him. Just because a relationship is polyamorous doesn't mean that cheating can't occur. Part of the implicit contract in a poly relationship is that all new partners are acknowledged openly.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 12:49 AM
1

nd he answers "yes sir I do in fact hate black people, thank you very much" I'm not sure you could find anyone who would argue that the resulting beating was not his fault. I'm not arguing that it is wise to jog alone in the dark, no matter how you are dressed. I'm merely saying that this argument is facetious and intellectually dishonest. There is a huge difference between someone who is minding their own business being attacked and someone who is going around and verbally assaulting people get…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 09:58 PM
3

I would argue that the KKK member was actively and intentionally being provocative, so he clearly contributed to his own ass beating. The woman, on the other hand, was passively utilizing public space, with no overt act of hers making a rape more likely to occur. It may not be smart to jog in the middle of the night, but existing is different than encouraging.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 06:24 AM
3

It's not that feminists or other liberal activists love the third world; the third world is where their ideals are the most needed. Feminists can rant and rave at the inequality of a country like America or England, but it is impossible to deny that in a country like Haiti there is real oppression to be fought.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:48 AM
1

The Wiretapping act mentioned was a Federal law. More importantly, though, recording someone having sex without getting them to consent to the taping is still sexual assault in most places.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:50 AM
1

Yeah... it sounded like she was having an orgasm more than crying.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 12:08 AM
4

Hehe... you know what else is on March 8th? Mardi Gras...
/r/MensRights07/03/11 05:51 AM
2

I imagine it's about as difficult for a single father to adopt as it is for most gay couples as well, so even avoiding a surrogate is not the best option.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 06:27 AM
2

If only they would do that in America.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:54 PM
3

Actually, at my college, the dorm bathrooms were almost all gender-neutral. I say almost, because it was up to a floor-wide vote, and a lot of the female floors voted to segregate their bathroom... which was inconvenient if visiting a female friend.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 04:28 AM
3

Exactly: men tend away from chit-chat in the bathroom... its all about business.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 04:26 AM
4

Yes it is a double standard. And yes, you are overthinking it. Sometimes, reading this reddit, I fear that we are getting ever closer to the world of Fahrenheit 451, where everyone is so afraid of offending anyone, male, female, lawyer, doctor, plumber, whatever, that all literature and normal television is outlawed. Not everything is a political affront.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 04:58 AM
4

Since the American system is set up such that one is innocent until proven guilty, it follows that one is an accuser until proven a victim - does it not? The difference is that someone is innocent until its proven they committed a crime. A person is a victim once it is confirmed a crime has been perpetrated. I think this law is a little misguided. For one thing, if a rape is never brought to the courts, the man has no chance to clear his name. He is merely branded by the word of a woman, with no…
/r/MensRights06/02/11 02:29 AM
2

Of course: if it's not about women forcing men to become fathers, then cuckolding them, it's not r/MR
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:22 AM
1

Great TL;DR: upboat.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 05:51 AM
18

I think it's interesting that it is an ad both for supplements AND for a costume shop.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:43 AM
7

And then does nothing about it. Yay, progress /s
/r/MensRights07/12/10 06:26 AM
13

I also told him that I felt really awful about having to feel this way, and that it was such a shame that society forced us to discriminate against kind, competent men as caregivers for our kids. Yes, it is such a shame that she was forced at gun point to discriminate against a man for no reason. Fuck her.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 06:23 AM
1

"Mr. President, we need pussy bailouts. My pussy is too big to fail..."
/r/MensRights05/12/10 07:31 AM
13

Yes, because this is clearly an issue of male oppression by the gynocracy, and not an issue of certain men being willing to put up with anything in order to get laid.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 09:35 PM
2

Well, they needed to do research to be able to say it with a straight face.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:58 PM
2

Because there aren't as many kids raised by a single father.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 04:01 AM
2

"The same joke was featured in an episode of The Family Guy, as I understand it, proving the thought isn't particularly original." Buzinga...
/r/MensRights15/10/10 03:00 AM
2

This. I don't understand the vehemence against this here. It's asking men not to get into a situation where they can be accused of rape. Isn't that what MR is always shouting about?
/r/MensRights13/10/10 08:04 PM
1

Well, you could move to the UK. It's close enough.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 03:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter