TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BarryHalls Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by BarryHalls on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Bingo.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 04:57 PM
1

I think more to the point, physical force is not an effective tool for the vast majority of women, even criminal women. Therefore they must be more cunning. On the other hand, a devious male, by and large, may be cunning or physically threatening.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 02:41 PM
18

Basic loneliness. I get that. I think you are more deeply damaged by divorce than most, but also more self aware. I married for life. I am still married. If something happened, God forbid. I would plan to never remarry or cohabitate. Maybe that's pride or fear, but it's what I think.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 11:28 AM
2

The person you date or marry is a status symbol, though. The better they are, the better you are seen to be, as someone worthy of capabale of enticing that person. They are selling themselves with who they catch.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:36 AM
9

90% of everything on social media, which includes dating profiles, is virtue signalling and/or status (bragging). It's all just pride and people bragging or selling themselves. The only questions are "what is good marketing?" And "who's buying?"
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:05 AM
1

This is not the place to ask this. You are getting a lot of jaded responses. You need to find some good books or blogs, first hand accounts and understanding of your situation. Autistic people tend to click with other autistic people and romance happens organically. I can think of couples I know personally that have been married for many years, met in school, and both parties are autistic and undiagnosed until middle age.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 07:34 PM
2

You really aren't reading or following what I am saying. Read "On Killing" for more detailed info. It's good.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:18 AM
3

While I follow your reasoning, history and the evidence don't support this, and civilizations which demand violence be very limited and execute murderers have been the standard for thousands of years. Furthermore, mot having an aversion to violence is not the same as no empathy or moral reasoning. Studies done on western wars from WWI, through Vietnam as detailed by Grossman and others show that as little as 10-15% of the combatants actively fired at the enemy when commanded to, the rest intenti…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 09:47 PM
5

Not even bothering to read this drivel, but I hear this a LOT. Cognitive dissonance is a real mental health issue and we as a society are constantly making it worse. We are teaching people to dissociate their beliefs and this is really really bad for society and individuals. Regardless, others here may be interested in Lt. Col. Dr. Dave Grossman's books, specifically "On Killing" Dr Grossman is the world authority on the psychology of combat and he says that 2-3% of people don't have an innate a…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 06:24 PM
4

I'm going to let you know something. Science agrees with money 99.9% of the time or what we call "consensus" or "the science is settled". Absolutely everyone is selling something. What are you buying?
/r/MensRights29/01/26 11:28 AM
5

Yeah, this isn't normal behavior. This isn't something like "women need to respect me specifically." OP is talking about someone with a mental problem. To be perfectly clear, this shouldn't be OP's problem. Go to someone in authority. If that doesn't work, escalate above them. Make it stop.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 08:33 PM
6

Civilization requires brave, strong, moral, virtuous, and grounded people, and lots of them. As we hurtle towards collectivism, and away from the nuclear family, those people are becoming more and more rare.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 06:03 PM
18

They have gotten the message. These movies don't profit like they want. They'll stop playing politics when politics stop making them money. They are just kinda slow to learn.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 07:55 PM
41

Humans are almost incapable of being objective. Everyone is selling something. As the quantity of information increases, the quality decreases. Dead Internet. We'll find a solution some day, but for now, trust what you see in person.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 01:07 PM
152

Always look at the language. Control the language to control the narrative.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 11:41 AM
1

I'll just leave these here. https://worldfreedomalliance.org/au/news/massive-anti-russian-bot-army-exposed-by-australian-researchers/ https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-social-media-fake-accounts-bots-bea114a2be8e0fcf73fcabc736047fd3 https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/s/2K5cgHaKqk https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2025/02/05/protection-racket-media-update-usaid-funded-ny-times-bbc-too-n3799517 https://x.com/mikebenzcyber/status/1888268448607957194?s=46&t=5aLgFmF0T428bJgRIxhGbg
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:59 PM
2

You can look it up, but a large amount of postings on social media is done by AI and/or from outside of the first world. It's also no secret that many countries have social media groups which work within their military or intelligence agencies. We can speculate as to the motivation and correlation but one possible reason is that this is done to influence elections, contributions, or spending. It would be perfectly reasonable for other countries to seek to bolster the positions of the parties tha…
/r/MensRights17/02/25 05:05 PM
1

Outside of relatively conservative (commited, exclusive, and with little/no toys or swxual media) relationships I don't think that sex is the commodity these people think it is. Who are they punishing?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:19 PM
31

I have always rolled my eyes at this ridiculousness. When I was 21-22 I worked a very labor intensive job and was built like an ox. I had more practical strength than practically anyone who was not on amphetamines or steroids. I still wouldn't have dreamed of walking alone in an isolated area without a formidable weapon, and even with a weapon I knew better. Empower potential victims to defend themselves. Maintain strict and harsh punishments for violent criminals.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:19 PM
2

Anyone who lives with their kids.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 08:53 PM
14

Fuck this bitch with a cactus. I was thrown to the wolves and was done being "RAISED" by the time I started high school. Before I was 22 I had a wife, a kid, a house (owner) and still have the same 3 things almost two decades later. I pay my bills, do my chores, and watch over my family. No one raises me. If you are a grown ass PERSON, and you need raising, grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:20 PM
18

God bless you. I can not fathom the logic that says "You can't tell me to wear my seatbelt. Tell everyone else to drive safely." Evil people exist. Risk exists. Do what you reasonably SHOULD to mitigate it.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:01 AM
15

Anyone who believes this has already forsaken reason for madness. Disregard and move on.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:04 PM
3

This should be the top comment. It's also fair to say what wr label as masculine and feminine are completely subjective. We COULD take a sterile scientific approach and say things like "The female brain is more optimized for nurturing through community and multitasking, where as the male brain is more prone to risk taking, tenacity, and confronting danger." However, there is ABSOLUTELY NONE of this going on. It's all just projection based on fantasies or personal trauma.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:31 PM
2

They chalk this up to opportunity. I think things like this have more to do with drive and expectations. I think more parents emphasize achievement for boys more than they do for girls. A boy is encouraged to be more competitive and he ties his self worth to status more often than this is done for girls. That, and specifically with some instruments larger hands, longer arms, make it easier to reach the keys.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:52 PM
17

If this woman or any woman has unrestricted access to the mens locker room, then men have the same rights in the women's locker room. Both of these things are wrong. Everyone needs their protected spaces. I am all for exclusive spaces. Everyone needs privacy at some point, and everyone needs a space where they can be comfortable. Maybe the answer is individual toilets and changing rooms, but anyone can go anywhere is not it.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 02:03 PM
2

Man, you nailed it. I have been with my wife more than half my life. You said what I came here to say. Partnership, agreed upon roles, values and boundaries. Hard work to fulfill all of that AND show that affection, and constantly reinforce your connection. Trust is king. Deep betrayal is really hard to come back from. I don't think I could do it.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:40 PM
2

Racism, sexism were on it's deathbed before affirmative action. Minorities who achieved status were being viewed more and more as though had overcome more and worked harder and were potentially better at their jobs. Decades of affirmative action later they are presumed to be "diversity hires". It's presumed they didn't have to be as qualified, hard working, smart, etc to get where they are. Given who pushed it and continues to push AA I would say that's exactly the point. It's extremely divisive…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:31 PM
2

Narcissists, PTSD, brainwashed and a smattering of other mental disorders would probably cover most of your 3rd wave devotees.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:27 PM
7

If you really want to understand what is going on you need to understand Marx, and the long march through the institutions. https://www.conservapedia.com/Long_march_through_the_institutions In a nutshell Marx was adamant that every cultural norm as we knew it was put there by the oppressors and was therefore bad and must be destroyed so it could be rebuilt to his specifications. Later communists figured out that the way to do this was to control the schools, media, and bureaucracy. Working prett…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:24 PM
68

The internet in general about everything. The voices that shout the loudest win.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:13 AM
1

What is Feminine and what is Masculine are subjective. Don't try to appease people who want you to fit into their molds.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:51 PM
10

Very true.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 02:23 AM
100

I have always found strength, independence, intelligence, ambition, and self confidence very attractive. I think that some people confuse aggression, hostility, and arrogance for those qualities much like some people confuse "nice" or good manners, morals, and respect for weakness. Those who can't tell the difference fuel these misconceptions.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:44 PM
13

Anecdotally, and I'm sure others have seen this, MOST hot single women over 25 (nevermind successful) fall into one of three categories, unrealistic expectations (think being realistic is settling), unable to commit (wants to keep shopping [usually until the dating pool has passed them by]), OR constantly choosing the wrong partners (usually that narcissist who LOOKS like the stable successfully mate they want). The outlier of course are the rare one who simply doesn't find the right connection …
/r/MensRights22/10/23 11:05 AM
7

Male and female brains are very definitely different, but environmental factors can minimize or maximize those differences. However, I think your analysis is correct. We treat boys and girls differently in inappropriate ways. Female ADHD is usually seen as normal socializing for girls and male ADHD is seen as a problem for boys OR (I think more likely) normal childhood development for girls and their discipline fits more neatly into a conventional classroom than it does for boys and this is made…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 03:43 PM
5

Dude, that's her problem, not yours. That reaction is bizarre to me and almost seems like the mother may have some PTSD or similar from an abuse or the constant bombardment of stranger danger type news. Regardless, children can be very gregarious and our paternal instincts should be to shelter and nurture them. You didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:32 AM
1

Dude, it's all about the dating pool. Women who are capable of settling down in a healthy relationship are almost always off the market before 30. Men tend to delay thay process a few years but the point is the same. The older the person, the more likely they are settled or not capable of it. We tend to pair up and remove ourselves from the pool as we age. The other factor is what you brought up, BAGGAGE: trauma, history, kids, career. Some things which make it harder to nurture a new relationsh…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:30 PM
2

I'm wondering gow anyone with less than six figures or a robust pension fund ever retires.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:08 PM
-18

Dear white males students, you are the reason for all of these bigoted-antibigotrt posts.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:00 AM
9

I'm really pretty sick of the "go out alone at night" trope. I have carried a gun every time I leave the house for 15 years because NO ONE should go out alone unprotected, even if you love in Mayberry, and damn the laws that keep people from protecting themselves.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 11:54 AM
1

This is all delusion. Young people who have obtained six figure jobs did so through intelligence, hard work, and self discipline. These are very RARELY the people who will fall for a gold digger, someone who is shallow enough to let income be the primary motivator for marriage. They are looking for one of three things: a real partner/equal, hit it and quit it, or worst of all, a pet to control with money as a leash. Which categories will these gold diggers most often fall into?
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:20 PM
29

He who walks with wise men will be wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm. - Proverbs 13:20 We become those we surround ourselves with, and this was known 3,000 years ago.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:00 PM
1

You put them in a box. EITHER race is a determinating factor (IE race A is more successful), OR it's not a basis for discrimination (IE, your opinion doesn't matter). 21s century leftism requires cognitive dissonance at every turn.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:06 PM
21

Bullied to suicide for being accused of asking for CONSENT. Bizarro world man.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:43 PM
11

I guess I'm just late to the game compared to you guys. By the time I was old enough to vote I was already the villain in every story and excluded from every program, treated like some sort of savage animal by every progression group, so it was never in question that I was their enemy, and they were mine.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:50 PM
3

The vast majority of abuse victims do not become abusers, however victims are more likely to abuse than than non victims. There is a stronger connection that female victims of abuse will go on to be victimized over and over again in adult relationships. Likely seeking out those same parental figures who are of course abusers. https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/effects-child-abuse-and-neglect-adult-survivors
/r/MensRights13/12/20 01:51 PM
25

It is emotional abuse, attempting to brainwash males to believe they are some kind of subhumans or animals. This is evil. Both of my parents were abusive, and I never will be.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 08:55 PM
1

I was afraid to google it too lol.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 12:28 AM
1

I am 190lbs and don't go ANYWHERE not strapped. In free states that allow lawful defense the privilege is the same. Defend yourself with the best tools available. In the USA, that tool is NOT muscle.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 11:58 AM
15

The article goes on at length digging in on the concept of "financial eligibility" of a bachelor. I can't imagine they would tolerate an article that bemoaned women not earning enough income to be "eligible".
/r/MensRights10/06/20 04:38 PM
9

I agree with your sentiment and deeply resent the negative treatment of male sexuality but the precluding issue is much deeper and simpler. This is statutory rape and sexual harassment. Teaches should never ever have a sexual relationship with a student regardless of male/female dynamics simply because of the student/teacher relationship. The teacher is always in a position of power, leadership, and responsibility over the student just like a supervisor over a subordinate at work. This means tha…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:11 PM
10

"They were asking for it."
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:01 PM
12

Identify as female and sue over the definition of a woman. This will NEVER hold up in CA.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:59 PM
7

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2424680/amp/Kate-Thompson-Britains-worst-wife--shes-proud-it.html It's hyperbole. The whole article is about how horrible she is as a wife and how greatful she is for her husband. Is their relationship balanced? Fat chance. Are they scum? probably not.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:22 AM
3

I just want to commend you and thank you for your strength and your use of logic even after trauma.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:29 PM
1

Valid point. Still, it's worth considering, at least to show little post controversy support for the statements, and help those targetted by these terrorists.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:22 PM
5

For anyone else interested, here is where you can buy their albums. https://siegebreaker1.bandcamp.com/
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:42 PM
4

This, this is how the 1st world raises boys and girls. The rules change once we are men and women. My mom had it right. To paraphrase, "Never hit anyone, but defend yourself with all necessary force against anyone who would hurt you."
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:26 PM
5

Also, I read this story when they first went to court. I believe she was a girlfriend, and the mother IS out of the picture, and the man is mentally challenged, with a low recorded IQ. The nazi thing probably didn't help.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:30 PM
8

There are not enough upvotes. I was raised not to hit anyone, but if I found myself attacked, end the attack with all necessary force. I will add that I have been attacked by women, and in both instances she was small enough that I could laugh it off, so raised my hands defensively, but returned no blows, just as I might do if attacked by an unarmed small man (though I've never been attacked by a man, fights yes, attacks no. . .strange. . .). I think this argument stems largely from an average s…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:29 PM
3

I would not be surprised if your hypothesis was correct. I think the basis is actually in chivalry which expected that a lady would never bring a dangerous force against a man, but as feminism, and indeed self defense, sports, work outs, training, etc make women more and more formidable or even more violent, I see this view going by the wayside and the upbringing that some of my friends had becoming more prominent. That upbringing can best be summed up as "Never lay your hands on a woman, but if…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:55 PM
58

You have to read a bit carefully. What is actually said is that among domestic violence involving 18-28 year olds, when the victim did not fight back, 70% of the time, the victim was a man and the attacker was a woman. This makes perfect sense in our social culture of 'never hit a woman'. 50% of all violence domestic violence in the age group was reciprocal, both parties hitting each other, but in the end it is overwhelmingly common for a woman to hit a man and him to not fight back.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:51 PM
-3

I know differently.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:00 PM
2

Of course they do. Men do too. When one persons story against the other's it's allabout who tells the best story, and no one gives a shit about what the kids say or want or even take sthe time to observe the kids with their parents. divorce and custody in the US is a fucking dog and pony show and the kids always lose.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter