TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BartlebyX Archive

View 1 posts and 176 comments by BartlebyX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

Social IssuesBartlebyX/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:36 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Or Kal Penn being hired by the Obama administration.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:45 PM
5

Oh FML
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:30 AM
0

I suspect idiots have made this argument...meaning they invented it so they could attribute it to others.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:06 AM
1

If you support the ideas we are here to support and discuss (without hating on women or increasing hostility between the sexes), I don't care who you're attracted to. Welcome! Pull up a chair, grab your beverage of choice, and sit by the fire with us! ❤️
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:34 PM
2

What a travesty that 'innocent until proven guilty' has a bit more than lip service in some few cases.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 12:37 PM
2

We must take care not to treat a hate sub as the norm, lest we devolve into that which we dislike in the hate sub. We are better than that...or should be.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:12 AM
1

Can confirm. I'm 48, single, like kids, have a good job, am decent looking, have good hygiene, my own apartment, and am not a felon. On the dating scene, I am platinum.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 03:10 AM
-4

Read my profile description, dipshit. I gild more often than I downvote.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:22 AM
-3

If you're going to play the stupid fucking downvote to disagree bullshit, I'm done. I have better things to do than fight with a child.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:14 AM
0

We don't know what the recording showed.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:00 AM
8

Fascinating idea!
/r/MensRights28/12/19 04:37 PM
1

Sorry. I'm slammed at work and thought you were saying the opposite. Mea culpa.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:57 PM
2

According to the title, the accusations are not unfounded, but false. Falsity means they are not true, not just unproven.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:52 PM
2

That's part of the facts and evidence. Her testimony is questionable because of a pattern of lying in criminal proceedings. I don't assume she is lying. I assume she has lied.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:25 AM
1

No, it is like saying she has a history of false accusations relating to events specific like this one.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:24 AM
1

Then why was Bill Cosby convicted in part based on accusations never proved in court?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:23 AM
3

Most of comments I've seen so far are bitching about how full of shit the post title is.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 12:26 AM
2

Putrid that he went to prison on an assumption.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:39 PM
2

I have less of a problem with the citizenry doing it, as they do so knowing they can be prosecuted for their actions and remain sufficiently motivated to do so in spite of that risk (but I still oppose it).
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:58 PM
5

There are a number of reasons, but the fastest answer is that I don't believe the government should be in the business of administratively executing its citizenry.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:17 PM
3

I'm flatly opposed to the administrative execution of human beings, but there should be serious consequences for this.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:42 AM
2

Reports of what? The post? People found it objectionable?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:47 PM
1

Indiana, USA, and I see a lot of em, anyway.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:10 PM
2

I believe it is a masculine name in England.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:32 PM
1

I work with a woman named Ayesha (though I don't think she spells it with a Y) and the only reason I'd not follow her into battle is because she'd be in the home protecting the kids of the men who were running into battle. She's an awesome lady...smart, hard working, strong, and sweet as cookies straight out of grandma's oven. The world needs more folks like her.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:32 PM
1

Good job, sir! :)
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:27 PM
2

I can't tell if you're being serious or not. Do you think she'll do that because he pays the house payment, cooks, cleans, does laundry, helps with homework, takes her to extracurricular activities, sees her plays and choir performances, goes grocery shopping, buys clothes, makes sure she dresses warmly when it is cold, wants to meet her boyfriends or girlfriends, teaches her how to drive, gives her money, teaches her ethics, and provides guidance? Or maybe his job is to care for her, and maybe …
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:26 PM
2

Why on earth would someone scoff at a single mom? I generally see sympathy for them. Oftentimes, a single parent means one or both parents fucked up (my ex wife and I did...she's passed now, so I'd probably still be a single parent either way right now), but that doesn't mean they should be mocked, even if they did fuck up. It's a tough situation for the parents and the kids. One thing I wish the discussions about being a single parent would stress more is the lack of time one has. I figured mon…
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:20 PM
2

What a fantastic idea! This is an A+ performance. I wish I was as clever as this guy... I miss things like this (I'm autistic and have difficulty imagining perspectives that differ from my own).
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:14 PM
4

Indiana, USA
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:21 PM
7

Because she might want to have kids someday. I shit you not.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 07:28 AM
11

How I had to get my (then) wife's signed permission to get a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 01:51 AM
1

I'm nowhere near on welfare but I'm not spending more than a hundred bucks on fucking athletic shoes. If I'm spending a lot, I'll buy good shoes for the office...not some sneakers.
/r/PussyPass02/11/19 06:23 PM
3

I can look at whomever I want. If you object to reasonable behavior, that is your problem for you to solve. Mature or be endlessly upset.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:14 AM
2

She's caught, therefore he is an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 12:16 AM
1

This isn't relevant to the sub. She's a bigot, not claiming benefits for being female.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/19 11:16 PM
0

No idea. I'm not considering legality with my opposition to doxxing...just morality.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 04:00 PM
4

According to one article I read, it's only a misdemeanor in California. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know how correct they are on that, but it shocked me me to read that. I'm philosophically opposed to doxxing. I sent a link to the article that names her to my buddy who works as a sheriff's deputy in Moreno Valley (also Riverside County), but I'll not do it here. I don't consider talking to the police to be doxxing, but I do consider speaking of it publicly to be such.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 03:21 PM
2

I appreciate how Joe Rogan disagrees with people, calls them out for being full of beans, or says something that could be taken hurtfully and does it without sounding in the slightest bit hurtful. He doesn't say she's (Nikki) a bitch, mean, smothering, or the like. He says she's smart, intense, and so on. When he speaks of Alex Jones, he says he loves the guy but some of what he says is crazy. Good man.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 03:13 PM
3

Irony. She has an image on her page that says, "Just because you've been traumatized doesn't give you an excuse to be shitty" and another that tells you to not act like an asshole when called out on something.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 12:37 PM
6

I'm not going to dox her but she has a series of prior offenses. I'm humble enough, but she deserves prosecution.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 07:04 AM
5

She got doxxed on Facebook and someone took pics of her car in front of her house.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 07:02 AM
0

That isn't my only defense. How old is your friend? How deep is their romantic history? How much do they work? I ask because I have a few things on my side: While I am a bit of a libertine, that is an advantage, as I'm also friends with all of my ex-girlfriends. They all still like me and would stand with me saying I'm not down with that shit. My ex-wife hated me, but she passed away, so she would not be a character witness against me. In conjunction with my libertine habits, I also have a fair …
/r/MensRights24/10/19 12:00 PM
1

Women have every right to decide what they want of men and men have reciprocal rights. I'm not suggesting otherwise. What I'm suggesting is that we stop allowing the narrative of what others want to be dominant in our minds. Women can tell us what they want, but what we want should be the dominant factor. ...and yes, we should tell women what we want. Incidentally, I'm not a MGTOW...hell, I'm into plural marriage. Hardly a MGTOW.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:11 AM
-2

I imagine my age is showing here, but I'm not terribly worried about their accusations. People know me, and while I'm a bit of a libertine, I'm also well known to be a decent person.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:56 PM
5

There was a time when women didn't want it, because there were responsibilities associated with it.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:48 PM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:22 PM
38

You are a beautiful person.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:20 PM
2

She's being called on it. I hope she is at least sued for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 09:59 AM
-1

There's a difference between rational criticism and bigotry. This woman wrongly threw someone under the bus. Many women would throw themselves under the bus to save another. People are individuals and while reasonable people can see there is a problematic misandrystic theme to society these days, the recognition of such does not mean misogyny is right or acceptable. All that will do is increase the division. We can fight misandry without promoting misogyny. Women aren't the enemy of men. Men are…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 09:58 AM
2

This is sanity...listen to this person. Investigate each accusation and defense of any crime or similar bad behavior with the crediblity that can be reasonably assigned to it. Not all who accuse are liars, and not all who are accused are criminals. Further, it has been shown that not all convictions mean the accused did it, and not all acquittals mean the accused didn't do it. Lastly, the accuser can believe the accused committed a crime, the accused can believe they did not, and they can agree …
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/19 09:51 AM
1

That's not the only source of what I've provided. Look again. Either way, I'm over this. There are benefits. I don't claim it should be done, but merely that there are benefits. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:55 PM
1

Yeah, I'm over you. Ad hominem. Appeal to ridicule. Yadda yadda. Good-bye.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:53 PM
1

Other organizations disagree.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:51 PM
1

Are there benefits? Yes or no? The literature seems to say yes.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:51 PM
1

I've supplied numerous links in other comments. Their potential motive calls for their claims to be questioned, but does not present a question itself. They are not assumed to be false until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:50 PM
1

Either the claim is valid or it is not. Your suspicion of their motive does not give evidence against their claim. If you have evidence they are wrong, pony up. Otherwise, stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:19 PM
1

I've said that the benefits are not considered to outweigh the risks and I said that the standard apparently differs here when it comes to this procedure. All I have ever said is that there are benefits, and there are. That you don't like it is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:17 PM
15

I wonder how many lesbians find the male body to be disgusting. I imagine quite a few do, and I don't view that as misandry.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 05:31 PM
1

You're ignoring my words. Let me know when you wish to address what I've actually said, because I'm sick of repeating myself and your use of fallacies.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 05:17 PM
1

The standard in Canada is. Apparently when it comes to this procedure, it is not in the USA. I'm not here to prove anything. You're still attacking the source and ignoring the following two items: There is objective benefit. There are a whole lot of articles out there saying your claims that there are not is full of shit.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 05:15 PM
1

"Voluntary medical male circumcision is a one-time, safe, highly cost-effective, biomedical, HIV prevention intervention supported by a robust evidence base of more than 40 observational studies and three randomised trials that showed circumcision reduces HIV acquisition in self-identified heterosexual men by approximately 60%, an effect that is sustained years after the procedure." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(19)30038-5/fulltext Publication year: 2019 The CDC…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:27 PM
1

Not a concession. You're down to questioning the character of those supporting it. That's a personal attack.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 12:32 PM
1

I'm over your baloney. Good-bye.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:44 AM
1

Nonsense. You are attacking their motives, not their reasoning.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:44 AM
1

I'm giving new ones. ...and the claims of the AAP are separate from their policy positions. And yes, when multiple rational sources agree, it tends to indicate something.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:41 AM
1

You're attacking them as people rather than addressing the reasons for their positions. Classic ad hominem.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:40 AM
1

Ad hominem
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:28 AM
1

The Mayo Clinic speaks of the AAP but their commentary doesn't rely on them. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/about/pac-20393550
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:25 AM
1

In most jurisdictions that is the standard. Also, you said this: “These stats are terrible, it's disingenuous for these to be called legitimate health benefits" Also, the Mayo Clinic says this: "Circumcision might have various health benefits, including: Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. However, boys with uncircumcised penises can be taught to wash regularly beneath the foreskin. Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The risk of urinary tract infections in m…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:33 PM
1

They also perform circumcisions of newborns (not all or always, though).
/r/MensRights19/10/19 10:29 PM
2

Thank you. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists still says there are benefits. "What are the health benefits associated with circumcision? Circumcision reduces the bacteria that can live under the foreskin. This includes bacteria that can cause urinary tract infections or, in adults, STIs. Circumcised infants appear to have less risk of urinary tract infections than uncircumcised infants during the first year of life. Some research shows that circumcision may decrease the risk…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 10:21 PM
-9

Perhaps, but violence is not justified.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 09:59 PM
1

Addendum: Quoting from the FAQ of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: "Circumcision reduces the bacteria that can live under the foreskin. This includes bacteria that can cause urinary tract infections or, in adults, STIs. Circumcised infants appear to have less risk of urinary tract infections than uncircumcised infants during the first year of life. Some research shows that circumcision may decrease the risk of a man getting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from an infec…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:56 PM
2

Are you suggesting the science has changed since then?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:52 PM
2

What I quoted were not policy statements but analyses of the benefits.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:40 PM
2

Those are from their site today. Do you have anything from them where they repudiate those statements?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:32 PM
0

You also acted like I was lying. I was not. There are benefits. They do not outweigh the negatives.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:31 PM
0

The benefits cited by the AAP refer to a lower incidence of some diseasesike cancer and HIV.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:30 PM
1

I specifically stated in my original comment where I mentioned the benefits and AAP that my understanding is they do not outweigh the negatives.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:08 PM
-3

I don't consider body shaming to be coercive.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:01 PM
3

They don't take a position on whether or not it should be done. The facts of its benefits were posted above, and that is all I referred to.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:00 PM
3

I'm pretty neutral on the whole thing. I've been circumcised and almost certainly won't have any biological children, but I've not looked into it enough to hold a definitive position on it.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:22 PM
0

It's more my understanding of the current position of the American Academy of Pediatrics than it is personal belief. I'm not sufficiently invested in this to hold direct beliefs. "Benefits include significant reductions in the risk of urinary tract infection in the first year of life and, subsequently, in the risk of heterosexual acquisition of HIV and the transmission of other sexually transmitted infections." https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/585 "According to a systematic a…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:16 PM
1

I dig. I've read up on it...I've just rarely seen opponents describe it so honestly. They usually use appeal to emotion, which drives me nuts. I see the reasons not to, but don't mind mine having been removed...but that's just me and mine. It might be nice to have greater sensitivity, but I also don't know what I'm missing, so it is hard to miss what I've never had. In any case I'm unlikely to ever have a son, as I am in my late 40s, had a vasectomy, and the kids I have* are all female and adopt…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 05:11 PM
1

It is voluntary if the person so encouraged is not coerced or making the decision under duress.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:25 PM
0

I'm circumcised and neutral on the topic. I understand the objections to it, but recognize that there are benefits to it...though I also recognize that the consensus of the American Academy of Pediatrics is that they do not outweigh the negatives.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:24 PM
10

This is probably the most fair description of the reasoning I've ever seen. It doesn't rely on emotion but it describes it purely factually. I'm relatively neutral on this, but appreciate your honest description.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:21 PM
1

"The accused is not guilty" is not the same as "The accuser lied.". The reason for the ruling can be anything between "The judge or jury was corrupt" to "The accuser lied like a rug."
/r/MensRights18/10/19 10:01 PM
1

I'll have to ruminate on this. There's an argument for this, but I'm broadly opposed to registries. I figure if the person is still dangerous, they should have a sentence long enough to protect society. It they aren't, let them out.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:51 PM
1

I thought you were saying a single parent could adopt kids more easily than a two-parent household.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 03:16 AM
7

This is fantastic! That it addresses both the needs of the kids and the fathers makes it better. I wonder what the rate would be if they included suicides linked to people whose fathers were absent when they were children. Maybe they already did? My dad having taken off on me still bothers me a lot, and it has been 35 years. In fact, it bothers me even n more in the past year or so because of some other stuff I realized.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:55 PM
3

Why can't people adopt if fathers are in the picture? Do you mean they cannot put their kid up for adoption if the father is in the picture? If not, my ex wife and I adopted when I was to be the father.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:51 PM
1

I'm not finding it on any news site (other than the above). I'm on the west side, by IU West. :)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 01:22 PM
2

I think their reason excuse is that he engaged with her more vigorously than she engaged with him...which is crappy reasoning. She picked the fight and she made it physical. He was laughing about it until then. In the portion of video I saw, it was only he was both literally and figuratively pushed that he did anything to her that could be construed as anything more than annoying. If I were his parents, I'd hire a lawyer. They can't even argue that the kid had to walk away, since Indy is a stand…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 01:00 PM
1

Wait...this is fucking local to me? I'm gonna raise hell! Edit: I'm not finding anything in local news or on the school website. Odd. Edit 2: Found it on the school site using desktop. I'm going to write some letters. Edit 3: Whoops...should've visited the site before I said that. Apparently Noblesvillehighschool.net is not a school website. It just has a link someone posted to the same article you linked. Im still going to write some letters. Grr.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 12:49 PM
1

Good point...she didn't appear to claim some violation for him hitting her, either.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 12:49 PM
2

The kicking was out of line. I don't think popping her one was, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 12:46 PM
1

Correct.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/19 12:45 PM
1

I object to the double standard. It's okay to joke about one group but not another.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 02:24 AM
6

I really don't mind the joke. I mind the double standard that would have people up in arms if a similar one was posted about women.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 02:23 AM
13

Women aren't bad, but the expectation to earn the same wage when you don't provide the same work is.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 08:28 PM
6

Are you saying that if we were just to compare hours worked, the number of hours worked by the average woman in 2019 is matched by the number of hours predicted to be worked by the average man between January 1, 2020 and April, 30 2020?
/r/MensRights06/10/19 08:26 PM
1

This person has serious problems, and I hope they get help.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 07:42 PM
1

I believe thought he could get concurrent time served (he couldn't) and if he went to trial he was facing somewhere around 237 years...and that's just for the stuff they bothered to charge. There was a safe they hadn't opened and several hundred DVDs that were as yet uncatalogued. Lastly, he said he didn't want to make the kids testify. That last bit is why I'm angrier at her than him. He said he was sorry and took it in the teeth. All her tears were for herself.
/r/PussyPass06/10/19 01:27 AM
4

What I suspect you'd do is control your rage and dedicate that energy toward being the best parent you could be for your abused children...since as angry as you would be, you'd know your babies needed you all the more because of the abuse. Source: I am the parent of three amazing kids that were abused so bad by their biological parents that it was noted as being the worst case in the history of our county. They got 97.5 years (plea bargain) and 39.5 years (trial) on initial sentencing for what t…
/r/PussyPass05/10/19 03:28 AM
6

Not the UK.
/r/PussyPass05/10/19 02:36 AM
1

Where are similar charts for women? How about fexpectations (for unspoken expectations from females), womindreading (for when women tell men the men didn't mean what the men say they meant), or any one of a dozen complaints men have about women? Wait...that's sexist bullshit? I agree...so STFU about mansplainimg, manspreading, and the other sexist bullshit, too.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:34 AM
2

It doesn't appear that he was ever convicted of a crime. Are you conflating this with another case?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 12:53 PM
24

I imagine he's spent quite a bit on attorney fees as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/19 11:08 PM
18

Yup...'not all women' is as reasonable a statement as 'not all men.'
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/19 01:37 AM
7

Meh...she's not bad looking, isn't complaining, and is taking it with good grace. Shouldn't make assumptions and slam her because other women are hypocrites.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/19 01:35 AM
2

Yup. On the other hand, I'd my own account after this, and my contributions to the joint account would match hers thereafter.
/r/PussyPass29/09/19 01:01 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/19 09:38 PM
1

Three years...maximum.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/19 09:29 PM
1

The age depends on the state/jurisdiction, but I don't think any state allows authority figures with minors.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/19 09:28 PM
2

One is not necessarily unconscious the whole time one has blacked out. There are nights where my friends told me I was quite active long after my memory ends...so they could both be staggeringly drunk and black out, but remain conscious.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:56 AM
2

IANAL, but I think it becomes rape when they are no longer capable of giving consent and not just drunk. ...so if a person is unconscious, incoherent, incapable of speech, etc, they cannot consent.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:53 AM
1

What if both people blacked out? Are they both guilty of rape, then?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:46 AM
-4

The difference is that it has never been treated as okay.
/r/PussyPass14/09/19 07:09 AM
2

The article I read said it wasn't violent or threats. Assuming this is true, the reporter was full of crap (and I'm inclined to believe it is true...it'd be a career ender to put someone in jail for just bitching).
/r/PussyPass08/09/19 11:34 PM
59

He probably did it in court and with little decorum. Edit: I was way fucking wrong and this judge needs to be removed from the bench and taken to trial. FML that's bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 02:30 AM
0

As I said, I'd have used the word 'people', but if the word 'women' was used, it'd have equal technical correctness to the use of the word 'men.' Also, I said at first I did read it that way (another comment) but realized it is technically correct.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:23 PM
1

As I said in another comment, it doesn't say 'only men', but I'd probably have used 'people' instead of 'men.'
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:32 PM
1

At first I was thinking the same thing, but then it occurred to me that it isn't phrased exclusively...so that it was also built by women is not disputed. It is just recognizing that men did it. To be clear: I'm looking at the usage in the same way a single construction worker might when they say they built a house or building when it was really a lot of people that did. It would still be better to use the word 'people', though.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:31 PM
7

Yeah, that's just her being an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/19 01:08 PM
2

Dafuq? I'm not against circumcision, but isn't this mayhem or aggravated assault?
/r/PussyPass05/09/19 01:29 PM
1

I'll make sacrifices for my babies whether or not they see them.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:18 AM
2

Oh, duh. I can't believe that didn't occur to me.
/r/PussyPass03/09/19 09:25 AM
14

That's for the federal claim. Why the fuck did the attorney file in federal court?
/r/PussyPass03/09/19 01:26 AM
4

Dismissed!? Grrr...
/r/PussyPass03/09/19 01:24 AM
9

This isn't females. This is one person.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 11:54 PM
2

Holy fuck. I really hope she didn't commit that horrible crime. I mean, WTF? A baby? A tiny little baby? FFS, stop the world. I want to get off.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 11:53 PM
5

❤️
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 02:43 PM
7

Yeah, she wasn't a high enough level for that. P.S. Could *have.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 01:51 PM
8

I thought she'd try to use it and the big woman in the white shirt would destroy her for it. I'm not sure I'd want to fight white shirt...she's a frickin beast.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 10:55 AM
8

Longer video with sound: https://youtu.be/E8CJtug4Xt4
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 08:33 AM
1

I dunno...the lion in the white shirt is female and I'm guessing she could handle two regular guys pretty easily.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/19 08:28 AM
1

This is a pretty good description.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 02:29 PM
3

He had reasonable suspicion because there was a report of such. There wasn't enough to prosecute, but to detain for investigation? Absolutely.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 01:30 PM
4

He had reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed and that she was the one who did it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 01:00 PM
3

The crime was failure to obey the lawful order of a police officer.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 12:49 PM
7

She should've shut up and asked for her lawyer.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 05:42 AM
10

No, it is not. It is a radfem subreddit filled with women who pretty much have an open and seething hatred of men.
/r/PussyPass22/08/19 02:49 PM
4

What man beyond his early 20s is disgusted by periods? They happen and they can be messy. So what? I'm not interested in going down on her just then, but otherwise, meh.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 09:32 AM
19

I think she is a hideous person, but I don't think most feminists think like she does (I certainly hope to fuck they don't, or there is little hope for society).
/r/PussyPass21/08/19 11:53 AM
1

Meh...at most it is discrimination by way of marketing. IDGAF about that.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/19 10:02 PM
2

How can he slap?!
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/19 12:13 AM
1

TBH, I don't know. I imagine I could walk away from that one, and would if I could. ...but another TBH is that I don't know how to fight. I mean, I understand the concepts, but I've had no training and suck at it, so I'm likely to be scared pissing if I can't get away.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:40 AM
12

I can't run (bad knee), and when I say I would give someone all I have, I don't mean I'd keep going forever. I mean I'd use what force I have until the person stops attacking me, whether that force is my hands, feet, a knife, a gun, or a 1972 Olds Cutlass Supreme.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 07:20 AM
0

That's awesome.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 07:08 AM
15

For most people, that was the exact thing I was thinking of when I thought of a knife attack. Alas, I physically cannot do that.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 07:06 AM
40

Um, why can't we? If a weaker guy attacked me and I couldn't get away, I'd hit back with all I had. I apply the exact same standard to women.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 07:01 AM
1

The real standard to follow. ❤️
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 06:58 AM
1

Obvious.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 12:39 AM
3

Dude...don't act like you don't know. Just dont. Everybody knows his "doctorate" came from a diploma mill and he's a total quack!
/r/PussyPass12/08/19 09:02 AM
16

"Hey, CPS.../u/therapistofpenisland here...I'm calling to report..." Yeah, I don't think that'd go well. 😁
/r/PussyPass12/08/19 03:30 AM
2

Oohhhhh! I miss social subtleties a lot. 😣
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/19 07:42 PM
12

I don't do much video, but I assume if she's full of shit, she'll be prosecuted, given an easy plea bargain, and get minimal time (if any).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/19 06:31 PM
23

An investigation is reasonable. If they find cause to prosecute, they probably will.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/19 06:28 PM
1

I'm a hypocrite on this. If I heard another speak as I do, I'd say something similar to what you said, but I am harder on myself, because if I am not, then I will not fight as hard to be better than the person inside me. Similarly, my basis of ethics is generally (but not purely) deontological. I mentally hold others to the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative, but try to hold myself to the third, stricter formulation. It is better for me to expect more of myself than I do of others t…
/r/PussyPass08/08/19 10:12 AM
2

Honest answer...I wish I was a good person, but I'm not. I just try to wear the clothes of a good person and keep the jerk inside me suppressed.
/r/PussyPass06/08/19 01:08 AM
1

I'm not sure it was denied. For all we know, she might get off with a couple of infractions on a plea bargain (I suspect it'll be the case, because she's not only female, but older).
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/19 07:06 PM
1

Damn but she fucked up. What gives people this stupid ass mentality?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/19 06:58 PM
2

Donated. Thank you for sharing.
/r/PussyPass04/08/19 01:47 AM
1

I wish I didn't belive it.
/r/PussyPass16/07/19 01:06 PM
4

Do you honestly think she is unconscious because of the force used in his slap or because she hit her head when she fell? He didn't hold her hair and bash her head on the ground. The force he used was a slap. Now your argument is that I'm using legslese. You had told me to see what a judge would say, but now the law isn't relevant. Nice moving goalposts there. You've used fallacies of ad hominem, burden of proof, and now moving the goalposts...I'm done with you and your nonsensical arguments. I …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 03:22 PM
4

My evidence? Black letter law. That's my evidence. I established that assault is wrongly giving someone reasonable apprehension of harm or unwelcome touching. I also established that one may use reasonable force to prevent such. You've made lots of claims with nothing to back it up except an admonition for me to Google evidence for the claims you've made.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:50 PM
6

It is self defense. Only clear evidence will change that. I can agree to disagree, but I have evidence on my side. You have feelings on your side. We know which is more substantiated.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:45 PM
5

I did bring up the law. I've not brought up the case law, but absent case law (IANAL and don't have access to Lexis Nexis) it seems pretty clear to be self defense. Scared people attack the people they fear all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:41 PM
8

I made a claim and supported it by providing the direct text of the law in my state and a legal definition. You made a claim and acted as if it is my job to substantiate it. And you have certainly nailed your point with your name calling.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:36 PM
3

Here's the basic (not discussing deadly force) portion of the law in my jurisdiction relating to self defense: “A person is justified in using reasonable force against any other person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force“ Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-35-criminal-law-and-procedure/in-code-sect-35-41-3-2.html I think a slap is very reasonable force to defend against an assault with a weapon that can…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:31 PM
6

You don't know anything about me, but because I have the temerity to disagree with you, you immediately go to name calling. They were in an emergent situation. She'd already moved to attack him with the shoe once. You think she was gesturing. I think she was threatening. Whether she was threatening or not, it is reasonable to think she was threatening...particularly for the guy who was facing her in said emergent situation. But you go on and call anyone who disagrees with you a pussy. I mean, th…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:18 PM
6

She moved to hit him with the shoe a second time.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:09 PM
8

The slap was a response to assault. She was threatening him with her shoe.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/19 02:07 PM
2

WTF? Edit: Dammit...I don't want to upvote your comment, but the truth always deserves one, even if I don't like that truth.
/r/PussyPass04/07/19 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter