TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Basileus1 Archive

View 1 post and 54 comments by Basileus1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

CMVBasileus1/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:16 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 08:42 AM
1

I didn't say the majority. But a significant amount, clearly. I also mentioned autogynephilia, which is not 'being a woman' but being sexually aroused at the thought. There seems to be a very strong correlation with pornography and autogynephilia, and autogynephilia with MTF.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 11:46 PM
1

I think, at it's worse it can be extremely harmful. But yeah, that may have been hyperbole lol. For most it probably didn't have much of an effect. Porn wasn't really as big back when I was growing up, so I may be overly suspicious of it. But studies show a lot of correlation between psychological disorders and the amount of porn you consume. So it's clearly dangerous, at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 11:43 PM
1

Sure... but even you take the 16-25 range, a significant number of men do experience temporal or permanent celibacy, and porn is a poor substitute that I believe leads to some mental issues. Porn in conjunction with a moderate sex life is far more healthy. But for men who haven't had sex in the past two years or so, or have never had sex at all, porn is extremely dangerous. That's my point. Whether it's 14 or 16, it doesn't really make a difference, but thanks for pointing it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 10:03 PM
2

Right, and most likely those figures would require an upwards adjustment (in terms of not having had sex in the past year.) In any case, the chance of a 16 year old experiencing temporal celibacy as he ages to 25 is quite high.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 10:00 PM
2

Average in western countries seems to range from 14.5 to 18. Either way, it's kind of nitpicking. The point is pretty clear, regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:55 PM
5

Basically this. The focus, inevitably, has to be on the female, as she is who is lacking in the male's sex life. But since she is the conduit through which he experiences sexual relief, I think many men could begin to identify with her instead. The process of trying to make her realistic, basically, is what might lead to MTF and autogynephilia. That's my theory, and as you said, many men seem to get off of being a woman. The transition is clearly sexually motivated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:54 PM
2

It's more like, if have this tiny crack in your personality, and you watch a lot of porn, it seeps into that crack and makes it bigger and bigger until you break. Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:43 PM
1

Depends on the country. But yeah, you are right. 16 then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:43 PM
1

It's not an explanation, it's the result. And the claim is not controversial, there is clearly a huge correlation there as any trip to NoFap or pornaddiction forums will show. The explanation is porn and lack of sexual outlets.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:29 PM
1

Good for you dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:24 PM
1

That probably also plays a part and I should have mentioned that in my post. I don't think that explains this whole phenomenon though, not anywhere close.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:22 PM
1

I'm not saying most men 14-25 have never had sex. Read what I said. I said most men 14-25 experience temporary celibacy (going a year without sex.) You can find plenty of stats to support this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:19 PM
13

If you 'f*** like a feminist', you will never get laid.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:47 PM
1

It definitely implies that. But it could also be read as a more general statement of what makes a man attractive to women in general, not just to you. not being "sexist" makes a man by definition effeminate Agreed. Which is why it's surprising to see all the women here except for you choose autism. Though I'm quite sure in reality they would not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 08:04 PM
1

Do you mean requirements for what you look for in a man, or requirements for men to succeed in general? I certainly think that a certain degree of 'sexism' (ie: rejecting the feminist worldview and treating women differently than other men) is a requirement for male attractiveness, regardless of what the solipsistic drones here say.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 07:29 PM
2

Wow someone here has actually studied the topic somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 05:03 PM
1

Well TRP is for both understanding gender dynamics and improving yourself. A lot of men, especially those my age, are not really interested in the latter. But we are interested in studying modern gender dynamics, simply because it is affecting men, and the way the world functions as a whole, so significantly. Also, a lot of men on TRP are successful in life but are unsuccessful with women. Yes those men do exist. There are a lot of them. Also, a lot of men on TRP were ingrained with beta traits …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 04:44 PM
1

Yeah, that point was correct, lol. Every developing country has to have a lot of beta males. That was the case in the west as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 04:30 PM
1

wanted and the women were all submissively staying in their caves waiting for the alpha male patriarch. What? Who claims this? That's just a false premise. Hunter Gatherer societies were not egalitarian, but nor were the patriarchal. Patriarchy began after the agricultural revolution. But just because they were not patriarchal does not mean they were egalitarian. I would agree that were more equal than they were after the agricultural revolution, but that's about it. We don't know too much about…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 04:28 PM
1

Depends on how much time they spend I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 04:11 PM
1

This is not idle talk. In a forum analyzing the dynamics of the sexual market place, Elon Musk was brought up by the OP to discuss. I gave my opinion about how he fits into the sexual market place. That is not idle talk. unless your definition of alpha somehow rejects leadership It does. I'm not sure how familiar you are with red pill terms, but the red pill does not use alpha and beta in strictly ethological terms. They have far more broad definition. They are a loose conglomerations of traits.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 04:35 AM
1

He's more alpha than you, that's for sure. Looks like I've offended someone. Oh no. mean, you're here gossiping about him on an internet forum like a schoolgirl Giving my opinion/analysis based on a question by the OP =/= gossiping. while he's out there dictating what our life will be like When since has this been a factor in determining whether someone is 'beta' or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 02:25 AM
1

Well liberals have thrown their weight behind identity politics, but to those of us living in reality these things don't matter at all. So there is a concerted attempt by liberals to increase the value of their victimhood, and thus attract more attention and support. Basically it's not so much that this whole scandal has had a considerable impact, but that it is supposed to have one. And Time seems to be more than happy to carry out their propaganda in order to change people's views about the si…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 12:54 AM
1

The past Time Person of the Year awards include US Presidents, The Pope, Angela Merkel, Mark Zuckerberg, Vladimir Putin, and other world renowned leaders. Time's Person of the Year is given to people who have had a considerable impact in their country, and/or globally. You said: Vladimir Putin Seriously? If that's true that shit lost all credibility. That implies that you believe he is not at all deserving of the award. Which in turn implies that either you don't believe Putin has had a signific…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 12:14 AM
2

Well, clearly words are losing their meaning... Even singulars are now plurals, haha
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 12:07 AM
1

Implying that Putin has never been relevant in world politics...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 12:05 AM
1

Attractive people can be wonderful people, sure. Whatever. Doesn't matter. If you want stable relationships you should go for people as attractive as you or less. If you want partners more attractive than you then you will have to deal with the fact that they more options than you have and they might make use of that in the future. That's why his relationships fail. I'm not saying he's right or wrong in doing this, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 10:43 PM
1

one dude does to women what most women do to men, and this is the outcry. hilarious. also tiny violins. I also call out women who bitch about how awful they have it, while only trying to date the most attractive men they can get. Maybe next time don't project your own insecurities so much, and you might understand what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 09:21 PM
1

He thinks money is going to let him play at being alpha and date hot actresses and models. He could settle for a less hot, less desirable nerdy woman who would appreciate him for his work and not just his money. But nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 04:26 PM
3

Yes, if people were more equal genetically, the sexual market place would change. But not by as much as you might think. Take the dating scene of the top 20% of men and women right now. They have a ton of options because the other 80% of the population is less attractive than them. The differences between the top 15-20% of men are not too much compared to the difference between the top 20% and the bottom 80%. But the women in that group still mostly want to fuck the most attractive men of that g…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 03:26 PM
1

u/Atlas_B_Shruggin is right. Your examples are just evolution, not evolutionary psychology A good example of evolutionary psychology would be phobia of snakes and spiders. Most humans, even babies, have a natural phobia of spiders even if they don't have knowledge of how dangerous spiders can be. These phobias are possibly inherited from our ancestors. That's evolutionary psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 03:12 PM
1

Preselection
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 04:28 PM
1

This is what's confusing about RP. I can't tell if they aspire to be the suited finance type or Stan Kowalski Neither. Alpha is behavior, the goal of TRP is to help develop that (or it should be, anyway.) Money, status and strength merely accentuate that behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 05:02 PM
4

Read that article you linked. Then read the 'research' he's talking about. It really isn't very convincing whatsoever. First of all, the difference in the likelihood of having a daughter vs a son is very small. Given the relatively low sample size, I would say this falls within statistical insignificance. Furthermore, the methodology behind determining a childs attractiveness is strange (not to mention they are determining the attractiveness of children and not fully grown adults.) As if this al…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 10:19 PM
0

Money doesn't matter to any man in determining attraction. Some may desire a woman to work because they don't want all the pressure on themselves (or cannot support a family by themselves.) On the other hand, the vast majority of men who make enough do not want their wives to work. Or, at least, they don't give a fuck. Hell, many women who are married to men who make more than enough do not work either. Why do you think there is such a huge exodus of female laywers and doctors in the mid 30s? Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 10:53 PM
1

I think it would be ignorant for a man to say he is an expert on 'womens lives.' I know I get absolutely infuriated when I come across a woman who thinks she knows what the male experience is like. It's an exercise of extreme futility - they can't possibly know. They can only make some observations and conclude some generalities, but they can't possibly know the details or motivations. Similarly, I can make observations about women but it would be ignorant to call myself an 'expert of womens liv…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/17 11:54 AM
1

Catholics generally inherit Catholic culture exported from Italy and Spain. In these countries the sexual market was (and still kind of is) roughly divided into 'whores and Madonnas.' There is a traditional emphasis on virginity and purity, but loss of that generally leads to falling into degeneracy. Therefore, I would expect most Catholic women with low n count to be married quite young, or be old and have a much higher n count. That said maybe she just didn't find the right guy. I also don't k…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/17 02:39 AM
1

Do you believe women value sex as much as men? They do not. This is pretty self evident. I think sexual pleasure in women is secondary. Comfort and security for them and their offspring is the primary desire. Nowadays, they just don't need to make the choice between the two due to abundance of resource and/or AF/BB. However, for men the quality and quantity of sex is directly inked with their quality of life. That said, I'm not sure you can use 80/20 as an adequate refutation of the myth that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/17 03:18 PM
1

Catholic and 33 with an n count of 3? Strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/17 03:10 PM
1

Between n=0 to n=3, the increased likelihood of divorce in the future, relative to each extra partner is massive. After that, the change is not very significant from what I can tell. This is from a newer study, but I assume this includes all the people who married early, which is why the correlation between n count and divorce stops at n count 3 ('slutty' women could just get married early with low n counts, then divorce.) There are a huge amount of factors to take into consideration. I think th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/17 07:36 AM
1

That's great. Now, just convert to Mormonism and your potential divorce rate will be nearly 0%!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 07:26 PM
1

I ought to give you a delta I have no clue what means haha. The fact that your CMV was actually a CMV and not a 'CMV so I can tell you why you are wrong' is cool though. I'm not surprised at how high the correlation between parental divorce and divorce rates of their daughters is. Obviously it does signal family values, which the daughter will inherit. It correlates a lot with religious values too, which is one of the main traits to consider in determining the potential faithfulness of a wife. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 04:54 PM
1

A 65% increase is certainly very significant. However, the difference between the likelihood of divorce between a virgin bride and a non-virgin one is 600% (5% to 30%.) After 10 partners the likelihood of divorce has been found to be around 35-45%. Compared to 5% for virgin brides and 15% for one partner. So 300 to 900% more. So I don't agree that it's as or more important, but it is certainly an important consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/17 06:23 AM
1

Indoctrination, and lack of understanding of female nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 11:51 AM
1

Well it really comes down to one thing - 'solipsism.' Men and women are both solipsistic to some degree, but there is no doubt that in general the female mind is far more solipsistic by nature than the male one. Thus you see this belief that women have the same sex drive as males perpetuated by the entire feminist movement. There is no actual objective analysis there. The entire myth is grounded in the thinking that 'I enjoy sex a lot, therefore it can't be true that men enjoy and want sex more.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 10:46 AM
1

I would think that is obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 01:19 PM
1

She doesn't desire sex as much, especially not with new partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 12:16 PM
1

They are tied together. You said 'easier for men to be faithful.' The drive to be unfaithful is influenced both by thirstiness and opportunities. But more by the latter, in my opinion. Hence, an attractive man is likely to cheat the most. Followed by an attractive woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 11:32 AM
1

There certainly is such a thing as a 'rape fantasy.' The difference is that women, unlike men, don't really want many of their 'fantasies' to come true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 11:42 PM
1

No it is not. Men have a higher sex drive. Female mammals are also less influenced by the Coolidge effect. Familiar sexual partners quickly breed boredom in men. Combine this with our higher sex drive, and I think that effectively refutes your assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 11:39 PM
3

It's the nature of most women. They do not want to lead in the relationship. They do not someone who has less life experience than them because they may have to teach that man some things that they know. They want someone who knows all that they know and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 11:37 PM
1

Well, she's not a pedophile imo, but the double standard is quite ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:31 AM
1

Catholicism is a Roman/Greek religion. It was built to be a religion for that empire. It is an authoritative religion, but one that had to be lenient and diverse enough in dogma for the multicultural people of the Roman Empire to follow. From the beginning, it's emphasis was on the spiritual and supernatural. And as an authoritative religion with an established dogma, Catholicism (and to a lesser extent Orthodox) is naturally conservative and opposes radical change. Protestantism is a populist r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 03:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter