TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Basshead404 Archive

View 1 posts and 73 comments by Basshead404 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Anti-MRMBasshead404/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:23 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Seemed mostly like guys self hating. Equally bad, but that’s most teen guys growing up, not exactly an imposed thought process besides societal standards.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:37 PM
3

Tbf op was a guy by the context, and given the sub and post I’d say with a shattered ego from all this type of bullshit. Not exactly his fault or the sub’s. I’d say judge by the comments (haven’t seen them but could be wildly supportive given their usual history).
/r/MensRights14/01/22 09:36 PM
4

Nope, not at all, although that issue should be addressed as well. Our justice system is innocent until PROVEN guilty, and basing all of this harassment off of one person’s suspicion the kid was abducted is on them. They made that conscious choice to do so instead of just taking it as far as it reasonably needed to. The kid crying about all of it should’ve been a pretty easy giveaway...
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:58 PM
7

I mean given the current political atmosphere, expecting an outcry isn't exactly out of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:08 PM
1

You forget anti vax and other anti science/logic idiots exist. If it's a statement, someone believes it somewhere, no matter the obvious proof given otherwise.
/r/MGTOW231/07/19 01:07 AM
1

There's people who think whites are exempt from racism and men have a birth given privilege, so I don't really doubt anything these days.
/r/MGTOW231/07/19 01:06 AM
1

Your logic is a myth
/r/MGTOW228/07/19 04:13 AM
4

CuLtUrAl ApPrOpRiAtIoN
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:42 AM
4

If a white male is more qualified for a job, he's more qualified. Simple as that. There's no sex or race bias in picking the best candidates for a job.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:20 PM
1

Lol I wouldn't even say that, just that men are more physical than women, and physical abuse shows a lot more than emotional and is probably more likely to be reported.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:12 PM
2

I think it does honestly, as most assume men CAN'T be abused or aren't abused that much whatsoever. I do agree it's a weak point at face value, but it's a strong point in a debate over men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:11 PM
1

Except that just proves their point, that men want power and women to submit to their every order. This is literally the stereotypical "fragile masculinity" they label everyone with. When things are out of control, you want to radicalize the situation to gain control instead of achieving balance.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:04 PM
1

Women in general are outcasted and restricted, made lesser people than a man. We can learn from them with ideas on modesty and such, but to call their society better because they shame all women into hiding their bodies and working low wage jobs? That's a step in the wrong direction.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 06:05 AM
1

“Y’all trippin’ it’s not like I was chaining niggas up and shit and at the end of the day stop calling me Bill Cosby because it’s not rape if they got hard. It means they wanted it and I gave it to ’em” Apparently it was a very brief message on her Instagram story.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:51 AM
1

From a Google, it seems to be wiped from most of the internet. I'll link it if I can find it.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:48 AM
2

Very coincidental (and unlikely) accident versus malicious intent she admitted to. Which one is more likely? For what? Women's bullshit? This is the exact sexist precedent we want to get rid of. A man is no more responsible than a woman is when it comes to sex. And yet if the man is drunk and can't tell the difference he is at fault because "I didn't consent". For fucks sake who's side are you on here? Do you LIKE false rape allegations? 3 have come forward from what I know. Men don't like to pl…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:44 AM
1

Fair enough, since we both don't have primary sources and all that jazz. But point somewhat proven that the story said by the men is almost confirmed fact? Again, as I said before, that's the whole point of this subreddit. To criticize sexist laws and society, and push for a better version of both. This is a prime example you can cite from now on for sex-based bias in law/society. Investigate it as they would any other heavy accusation. Pretty sure Cosby was arrested on accusations right? Why no…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:37 AM
1

That's the whole fucking point of this subreddit. Push back against double standards and call out the hypocrisy. Just like Cosby and others did, oh wait.... Bullshit double standards like I said before. r/PussyPass would like to have a word with you as well. That's, our whole damn point. She will never be punished for her crimes, no matter how heinous or however many times she admits to them. Why would we pick some weaker target when she proves our whole point perfectly? It's not money, it's a p…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:33 AM
2

She admitted to raping men. Someone else here quoted "if he's hard, how can it be rape?" When asked about drugging or something along those lines. She's proud of what she did. Ah yes, because everyone just smokes the nearest bag of cilantro they see right? Or they just drink whatever's on the bar. You get the damn idea. Cosby is innocent by this logic. How do you suppose that? I think it's great everyone is punished for wrongdoings. Treat everyone equally. What injustices have been done that peo…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:10 AM
2

You know the logic is flawed. Why are you trying to use that as some defense for Cardi? What do you even mean? That since she's a celebrity she can do as she pleases? Again, what are you trying to say here? Nobody was trying to find dirt on anyone. But when someone has dirt and brags about said dirt with no backlash, that catches attention.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:05 AM
3

One person lied, compared to how many accusations and crimes? She drugged them flat out. She admitted to this. No guy will willingly take a drug that knocks him out. Why? Because he's a guy and it's somehow different? We've all heard the stories of girls getting black out drunk at parties and all but we still act as if they have importance beyond their poor choices. Either way you're trying to victim blame. She openly admitted to drugging these dudes. Once you're under the influence, you can no …
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:03 AM
2

See that's the issue. If she drugged him, he can no longer consent to sex. It is 100% rape if they had sex.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:39 AM
2

How the fuck did you come to this conclusion?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:38 AM
0

Obvious troll is obvious
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:37 AM
1

Except all that changed when she drugged him. He lost the ability to say no for any reason. If the same situation were played out with a woman, she could press charges without the drugs.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:36 AM
1

Yes, we get upset over bullshit societal double standards. How about I make a post saying if a woman cheats on you, you should drug her up and force a threesome? I'm sure that would go over amazingly.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:33 AM
5

She literally admitted she did it. For fucks sake there's no lying going on. Again, she openly admitted to all these acts and all, never denying a single statement. You're victim blaming by the way. Nope, just trying to play "best case scenario". We're already at the worst case, where she embraces her past actions and doesn't even feel remorse.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:30 AM
3

Lol we're not talking about Cosby though, we're talking about the asshat who openly admitted to her crimes.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:28 AM
5

She drugged and robbed men, she literally admitted to it. How much more clear does it have to be? Or, just maybe, we want shit people to be punished for their wrongdoings no matter who they are.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:27 AM
2

Any proof, or just your own speculation? Again you seem to be making your own assumptions, which still doesn't make her case any better. People commit crimes and deserved to be punished for said crimes. She knowingly and willingly drugged and robbed men, and never even felt remorse. There were no mistakes here.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:26 AM
7

Given she baited them and proceeded to drug and Rob them, I'd say they're guilty of fuckall.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:22 AM
3

So you blame the wealthy for... Being completely uninvolved with the poor? That has nothing to do with this bitch's poor life choices.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:21 AM
1

The internet is a bunch of incels accusing everyone of everything. You don't have to literally be an incel to have the incel mindset. Bottom line any place of genuine discussion has its own cesspool of bullshit.
/r/MGTOW214/03/19 10:36 PM
2

Fair enough, the situation can differ place to place, and I’ve heard how bad it can get some places. Good point.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:02 AM
22

And I’m German, but I’m still generalized as a white man. People don’t care about your actual race or origin, they care about the color of your skin.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:32 AM
6

Fucks sake, people are dumb.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:07 PM
1

Yeah, some of em were just... yeah. I mean honestly, it’s somewhat true. Just more about their insecurities around their dick than masculinity lmao.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:04 PM
1

I mean, that’s kinda warranted? Who the fuck thinks a non descriptive emoji is gonna start a revolution?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:56 PM
0

Link to the post? I’d like to see the madness as well.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:20 AM
39

It would have been so fucking simple to just say SINGLE PARENTS, like Jesus Christ is it that hard?
/r/MensRights29/01/19 10:51 PM
68

It's a case by case story, yet everyone always assumes man bad.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:47 PM
8

u/HeroWords indeed. Speaking the truth u/Bucklar didn't want to hear.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:28 AM
3

Numbers… which obviously show male issues. I don't know how much more direct I can be. Again, there are other many ways that an be portrayed in an ad to help. Step one is realizing there's an issue. And as i stated again, it showed firefighters to show occupational death. Calling that glamorous, especially when outshadowed by other issues, is naive. You may know, but you'd be surprised how many think men have it all under control, all good. Name one time men's suicide or homeless rates were brou…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:27 PM
2

Yet again, it brought up true male issues moody take about to spark discussion. That is a positive message. Fun fact, it started out with "hero worshipping", AKA why so many men die by their jobs, over selflessness and gender bias in occupation. The video quickly glanced over them to highlight other issues with these "few faces". There is no way you truly care about men's rights, you probably saw this in a crosspost and decided to come shit on it right? Because damn men for wanting to solve real…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:12 PM
4

So yet again what positive message was made in the other video? This video highlighted true male issues, that nobody talked about to begin with. Nobody talks about men's issues, because apparently we all have it made. Because there really isn't much help we can give in direct support. Its mostly regulation and reverse gender bias that needs to change. The gillette ad again pins all of those "men's issues" on us to clean up. It's a societal issue, that everyone needs to address.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:04 PM
4

Feminism where men are shamed for literally everything? Happens every day, you must be one lucky son of a bitch. It mentioned men's true issues, which people do not at all know about. Real issues, death rates, not just catcalling and other bullshit. The Gillette ad was directly bullying men to somehow be better. Yet again, men can't push everything. Women could easily help or do so as well. Where were the women in the gillette ad as well? Nowhere. Even though they sell just as many if not more w…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:00 PM
4

Yet again, it's merely half the issue. Shaming men alone paints them as the bad guy. How can you not see that? How are you that blind to feminism? I feel no insults but the slaps to the face I get by every day society. "oh you're a man, you can handle the physical abuse", "just man up, you have a strong mind", you get the idea. Not to mention all the catcalling and bullshit that happens the other way around. Society enables women to do all this bullshit, while men are left apologizing for some d…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:51 PM
4

How did it paint that whatsoever? What about it showed any issues glosssed over? Again you are very misguided and seem to have your own preconceptions going into this video. Showing them brings awareness to men's mental health needs, that men can't just be expected to work everything out. Pinking more problems on men does the opposite of helping. Even speaking honestly of the issue helps a lot, as people don't know about it whatsoever. Back to making all men responsible for the few right? No way…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:45 PM
6

Except in this case, it's highlighting why men are good, and why they are in a struggle to begin with. It highlights the inequality within society over gender that somehow "in a man's favor". The gillette ad took societal issues and pretty much framed it as a male issue, which is absolutely false. PS, suicide and death rates aren't exactly rose-colored glasses. This ad showed homeless men, working men, etc. You are grossly biased in this matter.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:25 AM
6

If you are this contempt with feminism shaming men, you need to re-evaluate why you're subbed here.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:20 AM
3

When it directly says that men can be better and pins the entire issue in question on men, yep I'd safely say it's attacking men.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:19 AM
2

When it's allabout how men can be better, yes.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:08 AM
3

One ad pushes forward the feminist agenda, the other counters their narrative. The points in the original ad were biased and one sided, and only polarized the video and it's message. Because it was made so to begin with. Nothing in the gillette ad addressed others involved in the issues, as if males and males only are the cause and solution. We all know there is a toxic level of masculinity, but not everyone knows why it's an issue. I'll help you realize the issue: we're only addressing men. Wom…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:07 AM
7

I would have liked to do so as well, but gillette wasn't so well intentioned. Then why support the first ad? It directly does so, and purposefully paints men in a bad light. Notice how it's a dad saying boys will be boys, how there's no examples of women pushing forwards the issues whatsoever. If it had included that, it would have made a hell of a difference. A commercial marginalizing men as bad (but not ALL men) will help nobody. A commercial unifying us on one front against the issue will he…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:58 AM
3

Agreed. One little acknowledgement of good men doesn't stop the bad light shed on us from the rest of the commercial.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:53 AM
1

Why do we combine these two issues as if they're related? There is an extent/form of masculinity that hurts ourselves and others, just as there's a lack of masculinity that hurts development in young boys.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:51 PM
2

Yes, because the cause perpetuates the issue. Women act as if men should be this way, just as guys do. They both equally make the issue worse. They’re literally saying men need to fix an issue. They are directly saying men are flawed. Not all men, but some men. They are painting it as men encouraging others to do manly shit and all that jazz, not one example where women do so as well. These are literally gender roles, and it’s an issue for everyone that needs to be solved by everyone. The commer…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:37 PM
0

They’re completely different issues. There is 100% such a thing as toxic masculinity. There is 100% an issue with father figures for children. The only relation is that toxic masculinity can drive the father figure issue further.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:23 PM
2

I mean, yeah it kinda has if this is widely accepted. People argue against the “alt right” sticker people put on this sub all the time, because men’s rights is an issue for everyone. We are directly associating ourselves with this sub now, supporting its posts and such. We are becoming an rightist sub if we continue down this path.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:22 PM
-2

Aw jeez, cross posting from r/The_Donald. I’ll be fair, yeah this is relevant and MR. but still, associating ourselves with the stereotypical right?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:20 PM
1

No, we don’t. I understand there are men that can be shitty. Those men were raised a certain way in most cases, by men and women. Again, the root issue isn’t within men. Women perpetuate the issue as well. Yet again, I clearly understand men are flawed. Everyone is flawed. The issue comes when Gillette makes this a case of “you guys gotta fix it yourselves”. Toxic masculinity is a societal issue, that is driven by everyone. Men alone cannot fix it. I agree. But there is issue when a company pain…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:18 PM
2

As there are women. Neither is an inherently large issue. Both sides are pushed forward by EVERYONE. Addressing one side or the other will not solve the issue whatsoever. That is the issue with their message. They expect men to fix “their own issues”. These issues are pushed by men and women together. Women expect men to be shitty people at times, as do men. Women push this issue as much as men do. Men cannot do anything more than already being done.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:08 PM
3

Then yet again, why is it targeting men whatsoever? This is AGAIN politically motivated, and you’re ignoring it altogether.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:04 PM
2

But yet again, why make a commercial only criticizing men? Yet again, their motives are clear here. They want to get on that man hating bandwagon. Men have to fix their own issues, there’s no way it’s the fault of all of society, right? They had the clear choice to be inclusive, they decided not to, to isolate men and how they’re so bad.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:55 AM
8

Keyword: society. This is aimed towards men, as if we are all flawed and need to be better. If men and women are flawed, how come they didn’t cover women? They DO indeed sell plenty of women’s products, I see no reason to exclude them. That is, unless they’re trying to shame men and join the bandwagon. This really shouldn’t be too hard either, like you’re part of the Men’s rights subreddit. Can’t you tell when something is intentionally painting men as the bad guys?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:21 AM
-2

This video highlighted how men can improve themselves and others. This isn’t a male issue, this is a societal issue. Men alone can’t fix it. What’s embarrassing really is that some men embrace this ideology, as if we and we alone have to fix it. Women patronize men who don’t show these manly traits and such, because “that’s how they should act”. It is a joint issue, just like the few issues left with women’s rights.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:09 AM
-2

Which.... we already do. The commercial insinuates this is somehow an issue in today’s society and paints men in a bad light. This is an issue perpetuated by everyone, not just men. Men are expected to be emotionally stable and tough. Men are expected to circle jerk around sexual shit and all. You get the idea. These are societal standards being broken, just like women’s over jobs and such. They are issues within our sexes that aren’t at self-fault.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:06 AM
7

Oh, yeah it was. The entire commercial was just about men, and the whole “boys will be boys” idea. This and many other things in this ad are perpetuated by men and women. It can’t be just a man’s job to solve the issue. This commercial focuses on how they aren’t perfect and are inherently flawed. Remind me again how it’s good to single out a gender again? Imagine the outrage if it was turned the other way.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:03 AM
6

Just as there are a considerable amount of women who do the same bullshit if not worse. The reason for hatred is jumping on this “shame men” bandwagon. Social issues cannot be pinned or addressed by a single gender.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:01 AM
2

Sadly I don’t think a shaving ad will break any records, although it would be pretty deserving. Fuck their “shame men” message.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:00 AM
3

Can we call bullshit on that definition? Women may experience typical occurrences of sexism, but men sure as hell aren’t free from it either. Their suffering to sexism has become part of everyday society, just accepted with barely any recourse.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:21 PM
5

They get the money someone could have given them to do so, could’ve strongly been against him and wanted to ruin his career, there’s many reasons. While there are many people who will accuse and question her, plenty will support her in any way possible. Also just to address your first point: although most are true, you DON’T KNOW which ones are true, hence why there has to be strong evidence. Going off an accusation is the exact reason why this Kavanaugh shit happened to begin with. She seemed j…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:13 PM
2

I find this very amusing and incredibly saddening. People can be so blind, so ignorant to whatever they want.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter