~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Most of the AlphaBucks (prime marriage material) men are off the market by 25 and many women who wait too long to look for or find a husband miss out on the picks of the litter.I'm 24 [M] and engaged, and I'd have to disagree that 25 is a bit young. Most of the other men I know that are interested in the idea of marriage and a family, including some of the man whores I palled around with in college, are either engaged or at the very least taking the idea of "dating" more serious in what they're looking for (I.E., they're no longer just casually seeing their fuck buddies). Of course in my situation, "off the market" simply means "not single." The wedding isn't until aro… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/07/15 02:19 PM |
| 6 | A question for the blue pillersAre you upset that language evolves? I mean, the original definition, dating back to late 1300's French, simply meant having regard and consideration for another. It was about another 200 years before the meanings "feeling of esteem excited by actions or attributes of someone or something; courteous or considerate treatment due to personal worth or power" came about. "Respect," etymologically, has had multiple definitions for over half a millennium. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/15 03:27 PM |
| 3 | A question for the blue pillersCall me crazy, but I think /u/dundundundone is referring to the other two definitions (to act in a way which shows that you are aware of someone's rights, wishes, et cetera // to treat or deal with someone in a proper way) that you conveniently left out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/15 03:17 PM |
| 1 | A question for the blue pillersAs a prerequisite, let me just say that there is no overall “blue pill view.” There is no consensual “blue pill strategy,” there is no verified “blue pill mindset.” The blue pill, quite literally, is everything that isn’t The Red Pill. /r/TheBluePill is simply a parody subreddit. It’s satire (the quality of which is certainly up for debate), or at the very least it's where people point and giggle to themselves at the silliness, and sometimes sadness, that comes from /r/TRP, /r/RPW, /r/AskTRP, /r… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/15 03:14 PM |
| 1 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Some women. Doesn't that put the concept of AWALT into dispute? Or at the very least, if (like he said) at least 43% of women would NOT enjoy being raped by handsome, wealthy men, then isn't it a bit disingenuous to say "women literally want to be raped by a high value man"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 06:39 PM |
| 0 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.He's certain that women want to be raped by a high value man. He bases this off of science. I'm certain that men want to jerk off another man and that most likely (at least) half of the men out there want to participate in a pussy-less three-way. I base this off of science. Why is his assumption okay but mine isn't? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 06:23 PM |
| 6 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.But you then said, within the text, "no pussyfooting around this one, title is literal." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 06:19 PM |
| 4 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Absolutely not, I just simply don't buy the notion that fantasy = would, given the proper circumstances actively and enjoyably partake. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 06:18 PM |
| 4 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.No man-shaming here. People dig what they want /u/Cyralea is comfortable enough in his belief that "women want to be raped by a high value man" to admit that men want to (not just fantasize, but will given the proper circumstances actively and enjoyably) jerk off another man, and that (at least) nearly half of all men want to (again, not just fantasize, but will given the proper circumstances actively and enjoyably) have a three-way with two other men. Of course not /u/Cyralea though; he's an ou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 06:13 PM |
| 6 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.That's a point for debate. And as a man, the things I fantasize about are mostly things that I genuinely desire. You're almost 50% likely to have have fantasized being involved in a three-way with two other men, and have most likely have fantasized jerking off a random guy. I mean, if we're gonna use sexual fantasy studies to figure out what an entire gender wants and men, unlike women, are more honest with anonymous surveys. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:51 PM |
| 9 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.From your linked text: Fantasies allow us to "experience" the outer limits of our imaginations safely, with no risk--and for some people, that includes fantasies of coerced sex. In fantasy everything is permitted and nothing is wrong. You do realize that just because somebody fantasizes about something, doesn't mean that they'd actually want it to happen in real life, right? Like, if I fantasize about surviving a zombie apocalypse, that doesn't mean The Walking Dead sounds like a dream life for … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:43 PM |
| 12 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.According to the text: So when is it rape instead of ravishment? Aside from obvious cases of drugging someone or having sex with the unconscious (for the feminazi retards: No one here condones these instances of legitimate rape) the difference is strictly in the disparity of your SMV's. You literally said "women want to be raped by a high value man," and then you literally claimed the difference between rape and "ravishment" is strictly based on one's SMV. Where am I missing context? What am I n… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:21 PM |
| 3 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Certainly not, however: about 63,780,000 Americans (according to the latest polling data) would consider themselves feminists about 43,100,000 Americans are registered Democrats about 1,620,000,000 people (23% of the global population) are Muslim 117,374 people worldwide are /r/TheRedPill subscribers I would say your comparison is quite disingenuous. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:17 PM |
| 9 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Fair enough, but where is the "context" line drawn? For example: when a RedPill Vanguard says "women want to be raped by a high value man; no pussyfooting around this one, title is literal," is that taken out of context? when a RedPill Vanguard says women "are definitely not on your side either. They’re not your friends, they’re not your confidants, they’re not your safe havens, they’re not your respite. Not even your wife or girlfriend. She’s not on your side," is that taken out of context? whe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:06 PM |
| 7 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Fair enough, but where is the "sarcasm" line drawn? For example: when a RedPill Vanguard says "women want to be raped by a high value man; no pussyfooting around this one, title is literal," can that be taken as literal? when a RedPill Vanguard says women "are definitely not on your side either. They’re not your friends, they’re not your confidants, they’re not your safe havens, they’re not your respite. Not even your wife or girlfriend. She’s not on your side," can that be taken as literal? whe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 04:05 PM |
| 1 | CMV: the opinions of /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards can and should be seen as being in line with the overall /r/TRP thought.Precisely, I believe that those comments cannot be seen as "cherry-picking." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/06/15 03:48 PM |
| 6 | Autism rates are 66% higher among children born to dads over the age of 50 than those in their 20s, 28% higher for dads in their 40s, 18% higher with teen moms, and higher than usual when there were wide gaps (10+ years) between parents. Thoughts?It's a general belief among TRP that men can have healthy children into their 50s while a woman's peak for healthy kids is before 20. I'm just wondering if this invalidates that at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/06/15 03:30 PM |
| 6 | Autism rates are 66% higher among children born to dads over the age of 50 than those in their 20s, 28% higher for dads in their 40s, 18% higher with teen moms, and higher than usual when there were wide gaps (10+ years) between parents. Thoughts?Wasn't really relevant. We all know that mothers in their 40s are at higher risk for defects and autism. For PPD, the more relevant information seems to be that there's a correlation between older fathers and younger (teen) mothers and the implied deterioration of sperm similar to that of eggs, the first of which is the TRP ideal for a healthy LTR and the second of which is generally denied by TRP. For fairness however, I added the 40s. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/06/15 03:28 PM |
| 3 | Autism rates are 66% higher among children born to dads over the age of 50 than those in their 20s, 28% higher for dads in their 40s, 18% higher with teen moms, and higher than usual when there were wide gaps (10+ years) between parents. Thoughts?Wasn't really relevant. We all know that mothers in their 40s are at higher risk for defects and autism. For PPD, the more relevant information seems to be that there's a correlation between older fathers and younger (teen) mothers and the implied deterioration of sperm similar to that of eggs, the first of which is the TRP ideal for a healthy LTR and the second of which is generally denied by TRP. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/06/15 03:25 PM |
| 1 | "When unattractive men have hit on me, I have honestly been insulted. It's sort of like having an amazing degree and work experience, and someone seriously asking you if you want a minimum wage job." Thoughts?even ECs and mods can post shit Doesn't that idea defeat the purpose of the EC and Mod flairs then? What's the point if you can just disregard something you disagree with because there's a "possibility that even ECs and mods can post shit"? That seems like the typical "NARPALT" cop-out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/15 08:10 PM |
| 4 | "When unattractive men have hit on me, I have honestly been insulted. It's sort of like having an amazing degree and work experience, and someone seriously asking you if you want a minimum wage job." Thoughts?So you think that someone who showed that he has an nice unplugged insightful opinion can't ever post something stupid? No, what I'm saying is that while you can play the lol did u intentionally pick the most ridiculous rp comments, people who did something right in the past are able to make mistakes, these aren't indicative of TRP though card with heavily downvoted noob comments, you don't get to play that card regarding upvoted comments from EC's and moderators. By definition: the fact that th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/15 07:23 PM |
| 3 | "When unattractive men have hit on me, I have honestly been insulted. It's sort of like having an amazing degree and work experience, and someone seriously asking you if you want a minimum wage job." Thoughts?It means that sometimes people on TRP are not in line with TRP thought, even if they are endorsed or moderators. I'm just confused as to how Endorsed Contributors (high-quality contributors who can be relied upon to say things worth hearing, users who are literally only awarded the label of "EC" because they're especially unplugged insightful contributors that show repeated dedication and a high-working knowledge of red pill theory) and literal moderators of not Straw Red Pill, but THE Red Pill … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/15 06:30 PM |
| 8 | "When unattractive men have hit on me, I have honestly been insulted. It's sort of like having an amazing degree and work experience, and someone seriously asking you if you want a minimum wage job." Thoughts?Does that mean, if I were a new subscriber to /r/theredpill, that I can ignore... moderator /u/redpillschool's demand that I listen to the endorsed contributors, they know what they're talking about, or moderator /u/MachiavellianRed's demand that I pay attention to the endorsed contributors, or moderator /u/MachiavellianRed's suggestion that as a beginner, I should be reading red pill content such as books and endorsed contributor comments and posts? ...because after all "people who did somethin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/15 05:38 PM |
| 9 | "When unattractive men have hit on me, I have honestly been insulted. It's sort of like having an amazing degree and work experience, and someone seriously asking you if you want a minimum wage job." Thoughts?Actually, I went through and only chose comments posted by Endorsed Contributors. EC's, as you know, are users that show repeated dedication and a high-working knowledge of red pill theory. When picking comments that represent the core values of RP, it's important to understand that TheRedPill is not a democracy. The veterans there have a pretty good idea what the difference is, and the Endorsed Contributors have an established history of providing good content. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/06/15 04:27 PM |
| 1 | The core concepts of "dread game," "negging," "holding frame," and "spinning plates" are not inherently manipulative and shitty; it's the intentions behind /r/TRP suggesting these that are the problem.Hey, my bad by the way. I left the afternoon I posted this for a long weekend away in Boston and kind of forgot all about this post (that's what unchecking "inbox updates" will do haha). Anyway, if there's sexual incompatibility in the relationship, and the guy's tried everything but can't get the sex from his girlfriend he desires, he could always just leave the relationship and find someone with whom he's sexually compatible. Sexual compatibility is, in my opinion, one of the most important as… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/05/15 06:11 PM |
| 10 | The core concepts of "dread game," "negging," "holding frame," and "spinning plates" are not inherently manipulative and shitty; it's the intentions behind /r/TRP suggesting these that are the problem.I guess the issue with "dread" is what comes next. Not to be a braggart, but I'm an attractive guy with a good job who gets looks from women; this does make my fiancée jealous sometimes. However, I never flirt with women in front of her and I reassure her whenever she feels just a little jealous or insecure that she has nothing to worry about; she’s the only woman for me and that she has my heart. This tends to lead into more intense, dirty sex than usual which is a pleasant side-effect, but I w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/04/15 03:52 PM |
| 6 | The core concepts of "dread game," "negging," "holding frame," and "spinning plates" are not inherently manipulative and shitty; it's the intentions behind /r/TRP suggesting these that are the problem.The word instill is what's tripping you up. That means your gameplan, your desire, your intent, is to purposefully incite jealousy in an LTR by openly getting attention from other women. "Natural dread" (for the lack of a better word) can happen without any effort on your end. By becoming a better and more all-around attractive individual, your girlfriend will take notice. It's shitty to want to incite jealousy and insecurity into your girlfriend. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/04/15 03:36 PM |
| 7 | The core concepts of "dread game," "negging," "holding frame," and "spinning plates" are not inherently manipulative and shitty; it's the intentions behind /r/TRP suggesting these that are the problem.This is the typical male-shaming argument repackaged. Male here, so I'm not really self-shaming. Also, this isn't male-shaming. Your whole premise is that "natural alpha-ness" is okay but if you intentionally try to emulate it then you're an asshole. No, my argument is that implementing dread and negging for the sole reason of intentionally creating insecurity in your SO makes you an asshole. If it's passive (inherent) it's okay but intentionally doing it is bad is an argument meant to keep low … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/04/15 03:30 PM |
| 12 | The core concepts of "dread game," "negging," "holding frame," and "spinning plates" are not inherently manipulative and shitty; it's the intentions behind /r/TRP suggesting these that are the problem.The whole dread thing can be effective in some situations. Again, when it's just a side effect of someone living their life it's one thing. The idea of implementing dread in your woman is where it becomes shitty. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/04/15 02:49 PM |
| 10 | If alpha/fucks beta bucks is present in society, will men not continue to be adopt more RP values?You really think that a normal chick that likes her boyfriend, is happy with their life, and wants it to keep going on that way is as rare as a meteor shower and/or a solar eclipse? You honestly don't think that's the teeniest bit disingenuous? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/03/15 02:29 PM |
| 14 | questions for blue pillers- I don't understand you guys.I don't think the red pill itself views women as inferior. it points out female nature for the benefit of men who don't understand it. The problem is "female" nature, according to /r/TRP (the that in AWALT), is: irrational inconsistent Machiavellian solipsistic psychopathic hypergamous that's not to imply that men are infallible, but being men ourselves why do we need to constantly remind ourselves of our own nature? Again, the problem is that within the /r/TRP frame of mind, while men simply "a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/15 05:18 PM |
| 27 | questions for blue pillers- I don't understand you guys.Alright, I’ll bite here: 1) a. I like to think so. 1) b. I’ve read the sidebar information, the mandatory literature (like No More Mr. Nice Guy), and many posts from the moderators and “TRP Endorsed” contributors. 2) a. Even though I subscribe to the idea that you should never be gullible or too trusting when meeting someone, the concept of “AWALT” is something I disagree with. It comes off as “men and women are just different, in that women are biologically and inherently worse people and more … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/03/15 03:52 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter