TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BattlestarFaptastula Archive

View 0 posts and 103 comments by BattlestarFaptastula on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think the tiktoker in question is called lovely peaches, if you'd like to look into it lmao
/r/PussyPass13/02/20 03:38 PM
4

Mate have you seen most of the trending stuff on tiktok? This is probably one of the less gross ones, there was some woman literally eating her own shit in trending lol
/r/PussyPass13/02/20 01:14 PM
3

I dunno. Every human being nothing special just means that most people have the ability to be great at something. If they actually put the massive amount of time and effort required for doing so, which is hard to do.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:30 PM
7

Unless you've experienced the situation before, it's just psychology that you wouldn't act. You're not a special human.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:15 AM
0

Yeah, I agree with you. I don't think either bag spreading or manspreading are all that bad, honestly. It's just getting comfortable and it's never been an attack against the opposite gender until somebody came up with the phrase 'man spreading'. Women put their bags next to them so there is room for their feet, such as in this image. Men spread their legs for pretty similar reasons, i'd assume. What's wrong with that? The last time I was on a train a woman put her huge bag on the seat next to *…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:17 PM
2

I'd pay for two seats if that actually meant that somebody wouldn't sit next to me. Which it doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:06 PM
0

I think the point is that the train isn't crowded
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:04 PM
1

Is that him? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:30 AM
28

Imagine a man asking a lesbian to touch his dick to tell him if its good enough, cause she's gay so it doesn't matter. That's practically illegal. Why's it OK on the flip?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 10:46 AM
1

Honestly, fair. I hadn't read the implications properly when I first read the part that says 'if you want women to care more about your rights'. That is an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. It's not right to only care about somebodys rights based on what other people who look like them do. I think what I said applies more to the second part of the point - though i've even changed my mind on that now, honestly. It's like telling a rational muslim that they should stop other muslims from joining…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:46 AM
1

Men do make that point, though, and it's a completely fair point! People get attacked for anything online.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:34 AM
17

Telling them they're ugly fat failures is only going to make them see you as a child. Fair enough to say 'I don't have to justify myself to you' but what exactly is the point in clapping back at them with insults? Just makes you appear to have no self-control.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:52 PM
27

Probably thinks that sexually harassing a guy gets her tips. Which admittedly, in a bar, might sometimes work? Doesn't make it okay. If anything that makes it worse because that shows the double standard, and that men aren't allowed to find the same things uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:50 PM
1

Feminism used to be egalitarianism. It's not any longer.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:18 PM
2

It's because theres a huge difference between 'modern feminism' and where the roots of it lie. And a long-standing feminist idol is going to be one of the first to notice the changes.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:59 AM
1

A change of mind from a redditor!? The pure horror of it!
/r/MensRights06/06/19 05:01 PM
3

I agree, but would you expect a cutesy little doodle of 9/11?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:39 PM
7

That text link leads to a nice, detailed, artistic breakdown of the history of D-Day too. That seems better than a doodle?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:18 PM
7

hmmm... to be fair I guess it would be disrespectful to draw something like that as a 'lil doodle'. Like making a nice cute picture of 9/11. I hadn't thought about it like that.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 01:51 PM
3

I can't even access this article from the UK wtf Edit for fellow europes: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/loren-morris-woman-jailed-having-3258099 https://www.herefordtimes.com/news/11086362.herefordshire-woman-loren-morris-jailed-for-sexual-activity-with-eight-year-old-boy/
/r/MensRights06/06/19 01:33 PM
1

Think of it as a metaphor for the idea that everyone's life has hardships.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:04 PM
1

Sounds like James Charles
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:02 PM
6

Assuming they are not currently a teenager
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:01 PM
0

From the same Gov.UK website, I just copied: "Section 2: Assault by penetration 11.Section 2 covers the situation where a person (A) intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of another person (B). The offence is committed where the penetration is by a part of A’s body (for example, a finger) or anything else, (for example, a bottle); where the penetration is sexual (as defined in section 78), so that it excludes, for example, intimate searches and medical procedures; where B does not consent …
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:19 PM
-3

But it's not, it's penetration with a foreign object. Your point is correct but you don't have to use a penis so a woman could do that.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 11:14 AM
1

Oh, for real, but that doesn't always mean their pain isn't real. Pain hurts more to somebody who hasn't experienced it before. It does annoy me on discord though when every 5 seconds a 13 year old is jamming in with 'im so anxious' like 5 times.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:14 PM
1

... I know what depression is. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/teen-depression/index.shtml
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:24 PM
1

And school is shown to cause both.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:00 PM
4

This particular lady has been absolutely disgusting by saying that her ptsd is worse than veterans. But in general you cant say that someone has a 'bad reason' for developing a mental illness, and so this meme (out of context) seems very sour. People have different levels of stability. Bullying can cause some people PTSD, and others can survive intense torture without PTSD.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:12 AM
2

You don't get born with depression, it happens due to tough situations or genetic predisposition. And it's well documented that school causes depression and anxiety. Being stressed out causes depression and anxiety.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:08 AM
2

Oh, no, I wasn't meaning that everyone should have to make compromises and have sex with bodies that they are absolutely not interested in having sex with. I mean, that could be compared to sexual assault by some definitions. ​ All I really meant was that I wouldn't care about a persons dick size, at all. The thing I wouldn't be able to cope with is literal pain, and in that situation i'd ask if we could maybe just not have penetrative sex (or try lube first) - and if the guy didn't want to be i…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:45 AM
3

I agree, but isn't that the same with male carpenters? I haven't ever even met a carpenter of any gender. That was the only point I was making.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 08:17 AM
8

Yeah it definitely fits on this sub. Shocking that someone would actually think this was appropriate content to post online.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:00 AM
23

Yeah, pretty much. It's pretty confusing hearing so much talk about 'sexual characteristics' for lack of a better word. I mean, I have things that i'm more physically attracted to but that affects my choice of partner a lot less than people like to say it does.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:06 PM
3

Difficult, sure, but sex isn't everything within a relationship. And there are workarounds.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:46 PM
2

Sewing?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:45 PM
41

Yeah this feels like trolling, especially under the mental health awareness week hashtag. Surely nobody worth a second thought really thinks like this?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:44 PM
68

Tbh I don't think most average straight women really think about dick size, unless it's actively causing them pain.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:43 PM
2

I get your point, completely. Logically you make perfect sense. In situations like this, not every brain is equipped to go to the logical answer. I have been in situations (not even life-threatening ones) where I could have stopped things from happening and instead froze up entirely due to panic. Everybody reacts differently to life-threatening situations, and only the most level-headed people are able to logically risk assess the safest outcome in this kind of situation. In its most basic form …
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:14 PM
1

idk, maybe it's because I live in a country where guns are very uncommon. But to me, staying in a room with a crazed person with a gun who is fixated on you and jumping off a balcony seem at a similar level of risk. I also don't expect that either of them were thinking clearly, this is a very traumatic situation to be in for the guy and panic makes you do risky things.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:06 PM
1

It's either a power play or a mental breakdown. She clearly wasn't thinking rationally.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:03 PM
3

Abusive relationships are, unfortunately, a thing. Just because you're not in one doesn't mean nobody is. Nobody just sits around, living their life, and thinks it 'makes sense' to force someone to suck you off at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:39 PM
4

Well he was literally being raped at gunpoint, so... I'm just surprised something like that is being said here when people would rightly flip out if you suggested that a woman ran away from rape because the dick was gross.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:32 PM
3

To be honest, if I saw this video and the roles were reversed i'd still be wondering "I wonder what she did to deserve that?". The behaviour is utterly deplorable from either gender, but when people are presented something with no context it is a normal reaction to wonder what the context could have been.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:41 PM
2

No, but context is still necessary here. It may even be a prank he's agreed to being part of, or he may have slapped her earlier in the day or something. It doesn't really look like she has any motive to be doing this and is just being a violent asshole. But we don't have any way of verifying that information. It's still a crime, either way.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:39 PM
8

Isn't this the same as saying 'not all men' and then getting massively ridiculed? This whole politically correct language thing pisses me off. Why can't people just realise that a group of people doesnt equal a hive mind. ​ I agree with you, it sounds like i don't.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:35 PM
5

People are shit. Some of them are men, some of them are women. It's just much easier to blame the ones you don't see as being the same as you. Marriage is just fucked in general these days. Both for the men and for the women. The world is fucked tbh. Fuck it. Fuck.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:34 PM
1

I agree 100% with the base statement. The reason the solutions cant be the same is because men are often discriminated against in that kind of situation, and their problems are treated as their fault for having sex rather than the systems fault for extorting them. ​ To simplify the solution to that extent means that the details of each individual persons circumstances don't matter. It could easily be twisted to say 'women who are forced to have babies are not forced into a parental role as they …
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:48 AM
29

It's a fair point, though it reminds me of saying something like 'why feed homeless kids when some kids are starved by their own parents?'. Yes it's hypocritical but that's not constructive. Northern Irish protestors have been doing this in a bit of a better way, taking the fact that everyone is freaking out about this new alabama law and going 'yes, that's awful and I want to support those people, but we have never had the right to abort and maybe people should pay attention if they care this m…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:04 AM
0

I guess it's because feminists aren't all one movement. Most traditional feminists would call themselves egalatarians these days. The people you are trying to convince are so radicalised they're not really feminists anymore and just want female empowerment, and the real feminists who entirely agree with you are completely ignored by the media.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:39 PM
5

I've had a Google about this as I hadn't even heard of this film, and all reviews from the timd are slating that storyline and calling it vulgar and saying things such as 'Her lechery runs repeatedly into his naïvete (and his descriptions of rubbing and oiling his toys) as if it's "transgressive" instead of the same old frankly gross humor with genders inverted.'. I agree with you though. Why did anybody think that was a good idea to put into a film. I'm glad that the media at large slated the s…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:37 PM
1

You'd be very lucky to even find out within 24 hours :( it's why these things still happen. Kids don't want to tell, especially boys.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:28 PM
1

These were a lot less effective than the ones we have now, and people still get pregnant using condoms today! And I can't imagine a male medieval rapist deciding they're going to tie a knot in an intestine and put that over themselves and remove all sensation. Not that all of them were men.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:26 PM
1

I agree that both are as bad as each other, but the point does make physical sense. An 11 year old boy would be PHYSICALLY (not emotionally) okay after non violent unprotected rape. This is obviously ignoring the clear STD risk, which is just as bad for either gender. Rapists dont often use condoms. An 11 year old girl would also be alive after that situation, but may die if she becomes pregnant. This doesn't in any way make one worse than the other, but I think the OP was trying to explain the …
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:24 PM
3

Some women are often rude to other women, but those same women wouldn't be rude to men. It's more the case in high schools than real life, but it still happens. Also rude customer service employees are more likely to be fired if they are men as they are often perceived as aggressive rather than moody.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:10 PM
1

What if the low supply was to change because the job was made more doable? If burnout and suicide rates werent so high maybe more people would be up for the job. Your point on senior doctors is very true in some cases and less true in others. Medical fields which are rapidly advancing (eg mental health, advanced surgeries, new medications) don't really end up in the knowledge banks of old doctors as its only taught in the universities. Though, obviously, having senior members of staff around is …
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:25 AM
2

I'd agree with you - but I was under the impression that people who do harder, dirtier, and more dangerous jobs often don't get paid more. The most dangerous jobs (ones that don't fit workplace safety codes) are usually done by illegal migrant workers in the UK, then most other dangerous work is paid at minimum wage. Though, honestly, I can't think of an example of a 'more dangerous' job in the UK beyond being a builder, a care worker for violent people, or joining the army - so I feel my perspe…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:57 AM
12

Honestly, all doctors just need to work less hours. The doctors that are looking after their own mental health are serving the community much better than overworked doctors who don't physically have the mental capacity to care about everyone they see any longer.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:49 AM
5

I did a paper route approximately 2007, and I know people who are still teenagers now who did them when they were younger. So I'm unsure what you mean by paper routes no longer being a thing. Otherwise, yeah I do agree with you. Especially on the response to a boy over 12 being abused in comparison to any girl being abused. Obviously abuse should get a big upset reaction, but that absolutely needs to extend to everyone. Nobody was 'asking for it'. Feminists used to complain a lot about men sayin…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:15 PM
0

I don't know when that happened, but i'm reasonably young and think that if that happened today they would both be arrested. The man would probably be blamed harder for it, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be dealt with in terms of child protection. Im sorry that happened to you though that's fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:32 PM
5

I'm actually curious. I don't know much about sentencing in Oklahoma myself.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:28 PM
1

See my boyfriend keeps insisting to me that the phrase 'men's rights activisits' is incorrect propaganda as it suggests that you are active and it is actually 'mens rights advocates'. I have no idea what to make of it and therefore made a stupid comment somewhere nobody's going to see it!
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:36 AM
1

I've seen a lot of comments from you on this post, and all I can say is that your username doesn't check out. Lawyers don't call people losers and tell them to fuck off. If you want to engage in discussion, do so.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:34 AM
2

It's common reddiquette so that people can't claim 'oh he edited since my comment replying and hasn't even explained why, so he's obviously baiting people and completely changing his comments'. It's really common. I'm surprised you haven't seen it before.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:31 AM
6

Upvoting this dude before it was cool, totally sweet bruh.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:25 AM
13

I guess the argument would be that that's only placing women higher than children? But also weaker than men? Idfk anymore.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 11:43 PM
2

I suppose perhaps it would discourage the practice of trying to live off of CS payments for addictions, etc, if the person thought they were being watched and couldn't spend this money elsewhere. It's obviously a bit restrictive, but i'm not sure that's necessarily a bad thing. This is coming from someone who spends their benefit money on weed. It would probably be better if I couldn't, though of course only my rational mind says this. I'm certain if I had a child to support, I wouldn't be using…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:36 PM
1

I was only giving my opinion, I am not expecting you to look at it as fact. If it has come across that way that is not what I intended. The semantics may be up to discussion, but they are not directly false. You can compare negging to gaslighting, though that wasn't my initial point. My initial point is that, in all honesty, BP has no specific strategy for casual sex as it isn't seen as important. Just for information, also, i'm not in either camp - i'm more of just an anti-third-wave-feminist t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 05:12 PM
1

Please look into what gaslighting is. If you're going to ask these sort of questions, try to listen to people's answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 09:17 AM
2

In response to your comment on that being power dynamics. I think I agree. It does make sense, actually. Thanks for helping me understand that, haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:55 PM
3

Ha. Yeah I saw that mentioned in another comment and instantly noped out of the thread, that completely closes down this issue. If a particularly poor (but not destitute) man can afford a razor, why is is now impossible for a woman to be able to afford one. His initial question in the headline is mildly interesting, but his elaboration makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:49 PM
2

No i'm not the intended audience at all, which is largely why I left it be and distinctly didn't get offended (despite my brains best efforts to force me to be). I've added a link to my last post though, just before you sent through your reply, just in case you didn't see it. I wouldn't fuck any given man. But that's mainly because my basis for wanting to have sex with someone is monogamy. If my partner was to cheat on me, I would withhold sex and I would end the relationship (unless there was s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:42 PM
2

1) I mainly saw questions asking him what he meant by it, as he stated it as an 'advanced red pill tactic, not for beginners'. I will try to find the thread... it was earlier today in the Married Red Pill sub. Edit: He said this 'Just two nights ago, after purposely starting a fight with her over something stupid (this is an advanced move for senior MRPers…newbies don’t attempt) and making her cry and then apologize to me, I was fucking her on the edge of our bathtub and yanking on the back of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:08 PM
2

Gaslighting is making somebody question themselves, their reality, or their sanity. I'm only trying to help you out in answering your question here, sorry again if I am not fully informed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:02 PM
1

Ha, actually that second point solves this for me. No other answers required.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 07:09 PM
2

No I think they're just saying hair removal costs consistent money. Which isn't even always the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 07:08 PM
1

Me personally, i've never done it. But then again I don't use the beauty products that most women seem to. I dye my hair once every two months and also use shampoo, shower gel, deodorant etc (obviously). In the case of these girls, they may well be using an electric shaver which is purchased once and cleaned periodically.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 07:07 PM
2

I'm not sure what learn by story even means. Could someone explain? (if they haven't already quickly reads all comments) Edit: Still don't know
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 06:59 PM
3

Making the woman feel uneasy and lose self confidence in order to make her more malleable to being attracted to you. (I may be uninformed)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 05:30 PM
2

RP: Powerplay BP: Equality They are no different in the application of that technique, honestly, it's the state of mind behind it. I've read a lot on theredpill about the fact that having the power of alpha over women is what woo's them, whereas thebluepill would state that the woman is just woo'd by a confident man who respects her. Theredpill also seems to like to add a lot of deliberate gaslighting into their techniques, starting at the basic and well known 'negging' which isn't even a RP thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:29 PM
1

Ah. The good old typo excuse when someone has been made to rethink their beliefs. Unless you're telling me your blood type, in which case I don't think you can get that 'fixed'. You're the one who's been screaming gross at every possible relationship configuration that's slightly different to yours, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:14 PM
1

Yep. Pretty much exactly why I was saying your statements about older men in the BDSM community were a bit irrelevant or tangential.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:11 PM
1

You didn't say '40-something men', you said '30-something men', you didn't say 'actively pursuing', you said 'date'. There is nothing off with wanting to date somebody younger than you, especially when it is mutual. Comparing a '45-year-old dude who actively seeks to fuck college students' with somebody in a loving relationship with somebody who has an age gap is pretty fucking 'gross' in itself. Like I said, it makes perfect sense in the teenage years. I don't know why you're trying to use that…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:09 PM
1

Sounds, again, like you're talking about your own experiences. Women date who they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:51 PM
1

Speaking as a bisexual person who knows furries, I am aware of this. But as you were saying in your other comment, 'many of us specify who we want those commitments with'. An older dom in BDSM culture being safer and more experienced has nothing to do with an older man being a more or less viable dating prospect. You've even proven my point by saying so! About the older man you dated you state 'moody, had an alcohol problem, regularly slept with younger women, and while he did want to commit, he…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:44 PM
3

Some of the redpill tactics i've seen include things like 'causing arguments on purpose, specifically about little things, in order to assert dominance.' - Which... is a bit abusive/morally iffy. There are other, more legitimate and fair ones, which if 'caught on' to may be detrimental to this 'game'. Such as not acting butthurt about not receiving sex, and this often leading towards the woman eventually coming to him for sex. (As a woman, this makes perfect sense to me. Respecting a woman sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:36 PM
2

If you get into a relationship with someone because you want it to be committed and understand the person you're getting into this shit with, the age isn't going to make a difference to their morals. Someone wanting to date a woman who only wants him for 'intellectual stimulation and experience in bed' is likely either lacking in self esteem or doesn't want a committed relationship, and therefore aren't going to be the kind of men who provide that. It's just less likely that a friendship -> rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:30 PM
1

But it's like looking for a relationship within the furry community (I know this has negative connotations and i'm not trying to say BDSM is the same thing), or the LGBT community, it isn't 'society at large' and has it's own sets of rules and social constructs surrounding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:28 PM
1

Sounds more like an issue with people who get into relationships for financial stability, than an issue with older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:26 PM
3

I don't think BDSM culture is really applicable to the 'normal' dating scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:24 PM
1

Sounds like you've dated one older man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:22 PM
1

My partners 11 years older than me, but we get on because we both have a lot more in common (good and bad) in comparison to people of our own age in general. Edit: for context he's 33 and i'm 22
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 03:06 PM
1

It's also called theory of mind, which is a developmental thing that is common to all children. If you look into that you may find some useful information.
/r/RedPillParenting07/07/17 02:29 PM
1

Thank you for your comment. I dont know if it's appropriate for me to say, but I am sorry for what you suffered and I am sorry (maybe on behalf of women) that so many people don't stop and think about whether the woman could be being abusive. The more I think about it, the more I'm like my partners abusive mother that I want SO hard to not be like. I used to not show remorse. I think I may have even used to not have it. It's so difficult when everyone's making it easy for you to blame everything…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:21 AM
1

It is obvious, I completely agree. I even suggested that maybe it was my fault, repeatedly. This was a few years back and I've gotten over myself to some extent, and so has he, as the abuse was certainly mutual. I was a 19 year old girl with a full time job and (at that point) no diagnosed problems except what everyone gets put on them which is anxiety, and he was a 30 year old unemployed autistic man. Therefore I was the 'successful', 'independent' woman and he was demonised as a 'scrounger', '…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:41 AM
1

If that is true, it's absolutely horrible. I'm not 100% sure on that source, though, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:53 PM
8

Over here, the women who I know who try this 'game' say that it's because men inherently never move out of their way because they obviously don't care about women or their personal space. In my opinion, if you're not trying to move out of the way of someone walking towards you in the street, you're the dickhead. Men sometimes don't move out of the way and women sometimes don't move out of the way, deliberately walking into someone is a huge fucking power play whomever it comes from. Thank you fo…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:21 AM
11

I only just recently realised that the term feminism has been completely twisted by third wave feminists. I would have considered myself a feminist until very recently, and whilst I was 'identifying' that way I definitely considered it a movement that was for bringing equality to men and women, that's how my mum always taught it. 'Boys don't cry' being equally as bad as 'Girls are only for sex' etc etc etc. But it seems the people actually running this cult want something entirely different, I m…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:20 AM
2

Immediately gets fired for being 'racist'
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:12 AM
2

Yeah my mother used to have a lot of weight on, but we (family) never shamed her about it (she shamed herself, and so did some of her friends, unfortunately). It is an illness, it fucked up her liver to the extent doctors were asking her if she was an alcoholic (she's teetotal), and over 10 years she very healthily lost it all through excercise. If people had been telling her YOU'RE A BEAUTIFUL AND HEALTHY WOMAN she would have had no incentive to get better and could possibly have even died. The…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:10 AM
1

YOU'RE A THOUGHT RAPIST. YOU DESERVE TO BE IMPRISONED. REEEEEEEEE.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:55 AM
2

Wait, what the shit? That's worse than dumping a woman because she won't get a boob job, why the fuck hasn't that been reported on? I'm not much into gossip but that's honestly a little bit shocking. For one thing I think Styles is British and we only circumcise for religious or medical reasons here so it's pretty uncommon.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:54 AM
1

How is it fair to publish male celebrities sexual habits and hang ups? I know for a fact if one of these men published the pros and cons of dating Taylor Swift it would be seen as disgusting, invasive, and sexist. This is all so insulting. Conor, don't get back with her if she's gonna sell your sexual hang ups.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter