TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Batty-Koda Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by Batty-Koda on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm not sure you know what objectively speaking means, considering you're objectively wrong that there are no benefits. Since you start with lies, don't really have any reason to continue to discuss it with you. It's plenty clear you'd rather lie to yourself than risk hearing something you didn't like. Enjoy that. I'm sure it will give you a wonderful life and not make you at all bitter angry and lonely. Oh wait...
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/16 02:14 AM
-1

You call an attorney and tell them you're preparing a divorce in secret and want them to get started right away. Okay? And what's that have to do with "if you're married you're a cuck"? I didn't say marriage is the best thing ever. You're just an angry bitter dude being all pissy about marriage. You're a sad angry little man, and you have my pity. You redpill? you sound like the lonely desperate creepers from redpill.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/16 08:40 PM
12

Ultimately resulting in more innocent people serving time for a crime they didn't do. Not if innocent until proven guilty actually works.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/16 04:27 AM
-1

Boys, if you marry you're a cuck. Doesn't sound like you're bitter and resentful at all...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/16 02:15 AM
1

Random man vs. woman catfights where a pussypass is not clearly defined will be removed. See that? See how we're debating it? Bam, not clearly defined, in violation of the rules. I don't understand how this is hard to grasp. She never invoked it, you and some other jackasses are ASSUMING she meant to, because you WANT it to be pussypassdenied, so you let your confirmation bias decide "I want it to be this, therefor it is." Grow the fuck up.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/15 05:23 PM
-6

Are you high? I just linked you the explanation man. The reason is it was misleading. It cherry picked only the worst stat and omitted all the others. Cherry picking the worst stat as though it's representative is being intentionally misleading, and not allowed. I linked you the explanation and you STILL can't be bothered to be informed. Chill out, not everyone is some feminist out to get you. If this were some feminist post cherry picking stats about men, it'd have been removed too, and I bet y…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:14 PM
-6

Read the thread, lazy. It's a response to the top fucking comment even. But you TOTALLY waited to have all the information before getting to your conclusion, right? Not at all worked up, and no possibility you're not being entirely objective, right? Enjoy your witch hunt, bud. I'm off to do fun weekend things instead of be harassed by people that can't be bothered to even pretend they had the information before getting pissy.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:55 PM
-7

Because that's not why it was deleted. Why don't you admit that you've lost objectivity because you bought into a witchhunt before having all the facts? You've been interacting with the asshats on this site for too long. You've forgotten that not everyone is some SRS/feminism/"Social Justice" Warrior. Not everyone is an enemy motivated by hatred of your cause. It was removed because it violated the rules, not because of malice. I do enjoy getting accused of "OMG YOU REMOVED THAT BECAUSE YOU'RE A…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:46 PM
-7

So it is cherry-picking to talk only about DV agencies? YES. IT IS CHERRY PICKING TO ONLY USE THE HIGHEST STAT, IGNORING ALL OTHERS EVEN FROM THE SAME SENTENCE. I don't know how to be clearer. YES, cherry picking is against the rules. YES it will get your post removed. You are the only person who does. Right, just like it's just me and that other mod that delete these posts, right? That's what another post being upvoted said, and my post was downvoted. Because the pesky facts, like that neither …
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:15 PM
-5

Well goodie, my comp froze while I was typing a response, and I don't really feel like doing it again so you're going to get the condensed version. That was true. The fact that a slightly lower percent of those who contacted DV hotlines were accused of being the batterer, doesn't change the above fact. Yes, a fact can be true and still be misleading. That's why we call out 2 versions of this explicitly for rule 5. Omitting essential information, and linking 2 thinks that aren't linked (a popular…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:51 PM
-10

lol, you don't even know which mod deleted it, and it wasn't one of the mods that goes into undelete. You are making assumptions to support your conclusion, not using evidence. Stop making ridiculous assumptions because it's convenient to have some "enemy" to attack. In fact, I can't even remember the last time Iw as a mod that deleted a thread that people got butthurt over on undelete. I was just the only mod stupid enough to think that conspiracy-witchhunt place was redeemable. edit: Ahh yes, …
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:28 PM
-6

Since this ISN'T undelete, I'll give the explanation here, and lets see if people can be reasonable. I've given it a half dozen times to people that messaged in, gotten "oh, that makes sense" each time, and yet NONE bothered to come back to explain it. Instead we get more witch hunts. This happened to men seeking help from DV agencies (40.2%), DV hotlines (32.2%) and online resources (18.9%). That's the sentence the quote is from. Notice anything about which statistics made it to the headline an…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:28 PM
1

Sorry, you're right. I should've been more clear. If it's a post (self post or link submission) it follows those rules. If they are comments, you can't tell if it was removed by the user or the mods (unless you mod that sub). Since I was talking about the submission, I didn't even realize my comment could be taken to apply to comments as well. My bad.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:29 AM
2

Since I replied to the other guy and you may not have seen it, I guess I should make sure to reply to you as well. You're the one that actually asked after all. If a post is deleted by a mod, you won't be able to tell except that it is no longer listed in the sub. If it is deleted by the user, it will no longer be listed in the sub and if you go to it, it will say [deleted]. It only says that if the user deleted it. For comparison, the linked thread says deleted, but this thread does not. Howeve…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:34 PM
2

It days [deleted] whether it was deleted by the mods or the user This is incorrect/misleading. If a mod deletes it, it does not say deleted. That only happens if the OP deletes it. If a mod deletes it, it just stops being listed in the sub. If it is deleted by a mod and deleted by the OP, it will still say [deleted] of course.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:31 PM
2

There's a significant difference between "allowing" someone to criticize you and defending their right to do it.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:13 PM
2

Valid concerns. Did you raise them with anyone actually at the school, or did you just come here to preach to the choir?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:56 PM
13

The whole situation should make you look at the judge and trial sideways. Not that the judge was female.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:10 PM
1

Please point out one of those people.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:19 AM
1

What, exactly, was the point of your question? If you can't leave your 13 year old alone, maybe you're just a shitty parent. Sorry that I was wrong and you weren't raised by Helicopter parents, you just want to be one.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:33 PM
1

Depending on the boy, yes. I'm sorry if you weren't mature enough to be alone at 13.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:21 PM
6

Sure, PierceHarlan was raised by helicopter parents and thinks it's normal.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:41 PM
1

I want to start with this: I appreciate your calm, thought out, and reasonable response. I think we are, on the whole, in agreement. I think I was just emphasizing the need for us to remain calm, rational, and impartial more strongly, and (ironically) with too much aggressiveness*. I think it is our responsibility to ourselves and the goals of Mens' Rights Activists to try to contain the hyperbole and exagheration of the other side most fiercely here in our "home turf" so to speak. It runs a bit…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 10:53 PM
1

To me, it's not aimed at all men who give girls a ride home, or ride the elevator with women. It's all men who do those things, and have horrible urges. It's still insulting as all hell, but it's not accusing all of us of having those urges or being a step away from rape. And yes, I'd say it is not implying all housewives are lazy moochers. It says don't be a lazy mooching housewife. Those qualifiers are important. It doesn't say you can't be a housewife. A housewife that spends all day watching…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:15 PM
1

Yea, I apologize for that confusion. The other guy in the other thread kept going off topic, and when I saw your name again I just assumed. That'll teach me to not double check. I was wondering how you got SO off topic, and now I just feel kinda like a dick. So, anyway, sorry about that. I agree and disagree with what you're saying, and mostly it's agree. I agree that many (I'm not sure I'll go so far as most) feminist groups do exist basically to benefit women. I think that, in their minds, the…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:03 PM
1

Ahh, shit, sorry, thought you were responding to my other post again. Lemme reread this in the correct context now and reform my response. So, I stand by what I'm saying. They are misguided, misinformed, but still trying to stop rape. I didn't say they're going about it the right way. They aren't. Some are borderline insane, but by and large they are not motivated by some hatred of men. It's idiots thinking the ends justify the means, and not thinking through the consequences of their methods. I…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:17 PM
1

Where? When I asked where it says ALL not most or some? Seriously, in what fucking world is that a defense of the poster. It's just pointing out that the hyperbolic rhetoric here on this sub is out of control. Show me where I said the posters were good or acceptable in any way shape or form. Just because I don't think something is the devil incarnate doesn't mean I'm defending it. If you think anything I said was a defense of the posters, you need to take a massive step back from the situation a…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:09 PM
0

Says the person who claims pointing out a poster calls some men dumb is a defense of the poster.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:11 AM
1

Hahahaha, are you serious? That's the best you've got for the claim I'm defending the poster. "Hey guys, this poster implies men are idiots" is a DEFENSE to you? What the fuck? Oh, and saying that's what the poster says means I agree with it somehow? You're an idiot, and that's putting it nicely. And no, tool is for anyone who is acting like a tool. Maybe I should stop calling you that. You might think it's a compliment, since you seem to think that I think calling men idiots is a good thing, yo…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:00 AM
0

Still haven't answered. Awww it's so cute when you try to dodge the question. Whatever helps you sleep at night, tool. Seriously, back up your accusations. Where'd I defend the posters? I'd love to see that.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:33 AM
0

Which once again proves you're just into strawmen, since at no point did I defend the posters. Seriously, go look at the posts. Asking you where it says all instead of some is not defending the posters. I really wish I knew if you actually believed it when you say crap like that or if you just don't want to admit you made a mistake.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:22 AM
0

And again you can't actually answer the question. Troll, tool, or SRSer in disguise? Which are you? Don't answer, I don't actually care.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:18 AM
-1

Once again, you have not explained where it says "all" not "some". No, not every thing is directed at every single reader. If I see "you'll have loads of fun" on a toy made for a 2 year old, I know it's not directed at me. Oh, and are you insulted because you're going to turn into a man as a result of reading those? Of course not, they aren't directed at you. They're directed at male potential rapists. They certainly overlook the fact that women can rape too, but they don't accuse every man of w…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:36 PM
1

I would be willing to argue that their motivations are to scare him, either to scare him to keep him from doing it again or just out of some desire for revenge, and not to cause him to doubt whether or not the sex was consensual. Further, and more importantly, I don't think that in the context of this thread those guys are the "they" that most would assume. But since those complaints are based on the way I read it and assumptions about motivations, I concede the point. Fair enough, good sir.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:02 PM
-1

Sorry, but the wall of text doesn't change the fact that you didn't address my question. How does the sign imply that ALL men need that reminder? Not most. Not some. All. How does it say that? First paragraph doesn't address it. Second paragraph doesn't address it, but does make generalizations (ha, hypocrite much?) and talk about things irrelevant to the question. Third paragraph emphasizes the part I was questioning, without really answering it. I'll come back to that one. Fourth question does…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:55 PM
1

I suspect that the guy friends don't know that it was really consensual. They are misled. They aren't trying to get him to doubt himself. They're trying to protect their friend, who has misled them. So even using "them" as those guys, I don't agree with the statement I responded to.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:46 PM
0

Who's demonizing the other side now? Their goal is to stop rape. Claiming their goal is to cause self doubt and blame is a conspiracy theory at best. They are misguided. They are uninformed. They are going at things in a very inappropriate way. I am offended by this poster. But never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence. Over the top rhetoric like claiming it's their goal to get men to blame themselves in situations like that is not good for the cause. It makes people …
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:38 PM
2

Your entire post is addressing whether or not a woman can consent to sex while intoxicated, which a_drawing EXPLICITLY said is NOT what he's talking about. Who has piss-poor reading comprehension? If you can't make a counter argument, don't make a straw man. Just shut up. If you don't realize that's what you're doing, just shut up. TLDR: You're arguing against something that isn't what he said, so you can take the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:32 PM
0

containing the ludicrous insinuation or suggestion that all men want to randomly rape women and must be reminded not to Where does it imply all? It certainly implies some. It even implies that some men are dumb enough to need this reminder or else they'd forget not to rape. I can definitely see how it's insulting, but where does it imply that it is addressed to all men? Edit: Just going to point out that oneiorosgrip is a troll or idiot. Lets take a look. She accuses me of defending the posters:…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:23 PM
1

I don't see it hinting at that at all. I think it points out that there is pain in this situation, no matter what. It would be hard as that adoptive parent. I mainly took issue with that you didn't seem to give a shit about them at all. Don't let your dislike for the people who do screw men over spill over onto innocent bystanders. It doesn't help the cause, and makes the mensrights group seem like selfish jerks. I'm pretty sure that's a stereotype we're trying to fight around here.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:09 AM
2

You've got some misplaced hate there, buddy. It's not like they've done anything wrong. You can hate a lot of the system without losing all empathy for people who chose to take a child into their lives, raise it, and bond with it. It's not the adoptive parents fault the mom was a bitch. It's rude, at best, to be so dismissive of their pain. I understand not letting that outweigh the pains of the father (and so, being in favor of reform,) but to be so callous in the attitude towards innocent peop…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter