| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Can't believe I had this conversation.I'm not an expert but I would guess that Native Americans are especially unlikely to commit crimes against each other because of stronger community ties among those that live in isolation (on reservations). And those that have moved to cities are likely (because of the rarity of ethnic Native Americans in cities) to interact much more with individuals of other ethnicities. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/13 01:43 AM |
| 1 | Can't believe I had this conversation.That something is statistically unlikely is not a reason to not be afraid of it. It's a question of risk vs. reward. It's still quite unlikely that I'll get in an accident if I try to drive home with a BAC of .10. But it's MUCH MORE likely than if I am not drunk at all. And so I don't drive drunk. It's very unlikely that a woman will be assaulted by a random man walking by her on a street. But it's WAY MORE likely that she'll be assaulted by a random man than a random woman. It depends on plenty… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/13 03:35 AM |
| 1 | Can't believe I had this conversation.Think about the reasons behind statistics bro. This is because the vast majority of people in the US live near and spend much more time around people of their own race. This is especially true of low income people who are more likely to be engaging in criminal behavior. This is why the majority of crime is intraracial. This does not at all mean that if I'm walking through South Detroit I as a white person should be less afraid of a black man than of a white man following behind me. That's absurd… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/13 03:29 AM |
| -5 | Can't believe I had this conversation.I want to make a pretty undeniable point. Accuse me of bias. Accuse me of whatever. But if a woman is walking alone at night and a person approaches from behind, that woman IS FACTUALLY STATISTICALLY MORE LIKELY TO BE ASSAULTED IF THAT PERSON IS A MALE than if that person is a female. Out of the total number of cases where a woman is approached from behind by another person at night, a higher percentage of the male cases result in an assault than the female cases. This is obviously true. FURTHER… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/13 06:02 AM |
| 3 | Well now I know at least.. (repost from r/WTF)Satire? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/12 03:19 AM |
| 6 | "Rape is a crime committed by a man, not a woman." Fuck You, Napolitano. Sincerely, Godofchaos.Please read and respond respectfully. Alright, so he could have listed all of those examples and wasted 30 seconds on his show. Or he could have said something along the lines of "Only people as morally vacuous as the Nazis would kill a child for the crimes of their mother and father." But the way he said it is plays better with his audience, and that's his job. His point that "Only people who's moral values I find repulsive would kill children" still stands, and if you have different values, th… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 04:25 PM |
| 1 | The age of old crooked white men is over. I guess the old crooked white women are moving in?As I said, the way I read it the only males she was hating on were those that opposed her on the issue. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/12 12:59 AM |
| -1 | The age of old crooked white men is over. I guess the old crooked white women are moving in?Jesus all of the comments in this thread are overreacting. Look at this in the context of the current debate over whether it should be mandatory that everyone woman have access to contraceptive options and reproductive services through the health care plan that they ARE paying for. The crooked old white men she's talking about are just those cardinals and members of congress who believe that an employer should have the right to impose their religious beliefs on their employees. Is that really so… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:47 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter