TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeardedBill86 Archive

View 0 posts and 170 comments by BeardedBill86 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For science.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:42 AM
3

There is no "we" and that's the biggest problem, until we change that everything else is moot.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:01 AM
46

Cognitive dissonance and/or entitlement.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 11:24 PM
17

They don't want to think about it, that would require facing the consequences of their actions (accountability) and being realistic instead of living in fairytale land like they've been used to doing most of their lives.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 11:23 PM
2

Indeed, lack of data currently.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:43 PM
0

It's not entirely true. A well endowed man can trigger a g-spot or fornix orgasm in a lot of women who believe they can't orgasm from PIV, simply because they've never experienced deep stimulation.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 06:09 PM
1

I actually went to a chicks house and it was full of feminist literature, I asked the question, challenged her on it, she distracted me with sex, we never met again. Good times.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:21 PM
1

No, and then be prepared for them to put you into the evil human box and remove themselves from your life so they can continue living with their head in the sand, probably shame you a bit in the group chat first for good measure.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:20 PM
4

No, it didn't. You've bought the historical revisionist feminist tale of the Suffragettes, there's a reason almost as many women opposed them as agreed with them and fully a third didn't go one way or another. Look into who financed and supported them, look into the original organisers, what they got out of it, who truly benefitted. Because the cost socially was halved wages due to doubled workforce, less time/resources for the family unit and raising children at home and putting men and women i…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 10:58 AM
5

I think you missed my point, I'm not saying it is, I'm saying it's entirely possible in a system which operates counter-narrative. Given that the goals of said system have become pretty transparent (and dishonest), I'd say its very possible - they obfuscate and misrepresent a lot of data about men, to push the man bad woman good narrative.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 08:35 AM
7

And how exactly do you study for that in a system that's designed to find men guilty, assuming it is? You're assuming it's not, which is foundational to your (and the mainstream) position and "data".
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:58 PM
1

40 year old here, same headspace. My last LTR was 4 years ago and I gave it my all, the tanks empty and I much prefer my own space, the occasional fuck, working out, reading and enjoying my hobbies, bed when I want, eat when I want, chores to my timeframe etc Companionship doesn't seem worth the cost, especially when in my experience all the things that grabbed you (excitement, kindness, sex) seem to all evaporate after a period of time and you're left with an annoying roommate.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/26 04:19 PM
1

Eh, I never did any of that. I don't believe there's such a thing as "good girls" or that women should be put on a pedestal, but I am realistic about the fact that women aren't all the same and a one approach fits all strategy doesn't work unless all you want is to smash. A woman who isn't stupid and wants long term won't stick around for "maybe".
/r/TheRedPill11/07/26 02:29 PM
1

Casuals are how I define women who bounce from dick to dick with no ability to form long term committed relationships.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/26 08:10 PM
2

But not directly like men, it's gossip and social manipulation.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 02:38 PM
2

Nah not really, I think most women instinctively know better than to ask, but its happened when I was younger
/r/TheRedPill09/07/26 06:14 PM
2

Because we're encouraged and then forced to compete with each other openly our entire lives, women do so far more subtly.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:32 AM
1

Only the casuals go for that in my experience.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/26 09:13 AM
1

This is great and all but what about when a woman you're really into just straight up looks you in the eyes and asks if you're locked in with her?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/26 12:28 AM
6

Define "rape culture", while you're at it might as well define patriarchy as well. Show me how either of those things are real and materially impactful. You know that thing people do where they start with a conclusion and then try to use any correlating evidence to prove it? Pretty much all Feminist literature is that, I've yet to see anything that couldn't be explained in numerous other more sensible ways. And as usual, correlation does not equal causation.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:57 AM
13

Yes, it's because men suck and that's all it is. Thank you for your wisdom, I hope that these men can one day aspire to even a fraction of the innate perfection of the opposite gender. /s
/r/MensRights24/06/26 10:47 PM
17

And as usual it was a short-sighted effort with no thought to how doubling the workforce would halve wages, reduce their free time and break up the family unit as well as put men and women in direct competition with each other.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:09 PM
0

Do you know what the definition of a strawman is? When you've it please use it correctly, now back to reality. When equality was achieved why did wages fall and what were the immediate ramifications of this? How many parents on average wage do you know who can afford one working parent and a home with a reasonable quality of life for their family?
/r/MensRights22/06/26 09:30 PM
0

To show how it's a strawman? To show integrity? To stand by your convictions? To educate? Dude
/r/MensRights22/06/26 09:08 PM
1

You misunderstand me, I haven't got the definition wrong. I'm telling you that equality as defined leads to this outcome and this outcome is demonstrably worse for everyone except the elite. This is where idealism fails against reality, it happens a lot, such as with communism. You haven't actually addressed anything I said in my comment by the way, you just started giving the idealised script of feminism, can you address the real world outcomes I mentioned?
/r/MensRights22/06/26 05:03 PM
2

Ofcourse it is, if you give women the same responsibilities as men (which equality requires) then women have to work, if women have to work they can't spend as much time with their children ergo the family unit cannot function as it used to with a singular provider. The parental unit loses half their "hometime" hours and outsources the raising of children to the state/third parties and wages are halved as worker supply is doubled. Why do you think just as many women opposed the suffragettes as s…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 10:50 AM
2

Don't forget halved wages.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 10:19 AM
5

Can you define your understanding of equity please.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 09:42 AM
0

Do you understand how indoctrination works? You're blaming a majority of men who have had no knowledge or context about these things their entire lives and no one trying to teach them. Think of child soldiers in Africa, blind folded and given guns and told to pull the trigger, take the blindfold off to leave them looking at someone they've unknowingly shot "now you're a killer". It takes time, work and often external help to fix the brainwashing that begins as soon as we're old enough to underst…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:28 PM
1

We're cooked regardless while we're ruled by self-interested 1%ers, there are no solutions.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 07:00 PM
0

What if that premise is correct, isn't it more descriptive than insulting in that case? Viruses aren't something we contract voluntarily.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 11:25 PM
1

I see, you meant to say "try not starting from" yes? That makes more sense. Why is the term insulting? Because it implies a lack of critical thinking or self-awareness? I should think that would be obvious.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:57 PM
-1

Old people are stubborn.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:45 PM
1

Come again.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:45 PM
1

It's certainly illustrating something.. such as how inflexible and myopic thought patterns are in general, at least today.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:36 PM
2

I'm not so sure, change is coming almost exponentially at this point. I think we'll see it before we're dead, or at least what it will be.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:28 PM
5

Not sure, they've done a pretty good job of brainwashing the population into supplication. Imagine the changes they've brought in over the last two decades being done during the 50's, can you see people then not taking to the streets and burning it down?
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:37 PM
6

Not really, less working people supporting an increasingly burdensome older generation while the elite siphon increasingly more money out of peoples pockets and immigration increases to fill the gap thereby increasing social decohesion, lessening common cause and cultural identity. We're laying the foundations for replacement of everything we value and even ourselves.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:13 PM
5

Mind-viruses don't propagate through procreation, propaganda is so powerful because your genes are irrelevant to its influence.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:12 PM
9

Incorrect, I suggest you read Rachel Wilsons book "Occult Feminism". Women were lied to and propagandised into giving away benefits they'd enjoyed for centuries in exchange to join the worker bee men, double the elites workforce and half peoples wages so that one person can no longer support a home, they also robbed women of their time with their children. Most women didn't agree with the Suffragettes, they saw themselves losing existing privileges and gaining nothing but trouble, they didn't wa…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:34 AM
1

I never said women don't do shit, just not by feminist standards. You see the irony is in order to propogandise the need for something, you need to ascribe value to it. So all male achievement and power was given value by feminism, so that women could be seen through the lens of lacking in order to be driven to attain it. What's actually happened is womens very real and vital contributions to human society throughout history have been dirtied and devalued by their own supposed movement, the roug…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:56 PM
3

When we're quoting historical fact, let's ensure it's actually fact shall we? "Men" are not a collective any more than women are, your patriarchy is a boogeyman not backed by facts much less simple common sense. It's only this past century that both sexes as a majority were simply trying to survive, this image you've got in your head of men in suits telling women to stay in the kitchen is not reflective of reality. Do you know what year the modern school system was founded? Do you know who was a…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:42 PM
2

I'm just saying men built the world, women nurtured it. Then feminism came along and convinced women they'd be better off being men (not the responsibilities or accountabilities though, just the perceived benefits). We need each other, the whole gender war is artificially created to keep us against each other while the top 1% laugh and sip the champagne our labour paid for.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 01:59 PM
5

There's a reason men outcompete women on average, we're just better than you in pretty much every category (on average). That's why we took the lead and built the world while you sat around enjoying the fruits of our labour and raising kids while complaining about how hard your life is, men just get on with it and get things done (luckily for our species).
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:48 PM
1

What word would you use instead?
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:36 PM
1

It's not, it's framed as the worse outcome. The word success in this context does not have positive connotations.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 10:08 AM
1

Because death, death is worse. And death should be by far the bigger focus.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 09:55 AM
8

When you remember that it's whatever is self-reported as "attempts" it all makes sense. Apparently attention seeking behaviour is equivalent or worse than actual genuine intent and action to die.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:53 AM
20

Do you really need someone to step by step you through why that analogy is ridiculous? Here's a better one, if you're forced to live in a society where some people have a different skin colour and some of those people of different skin colour do bad things, should you be wary of all of them?
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:48 PM
2

Yes.. have I disagreed with that? 🤔
/r/MensRights16/01/26 02:03 PM
11

The only gender roles in society are the ones detrimental to men and beneficial to women. Reinforcing those while conceding the rest is not good for men. Traditional roles went out of the window for one gender as soon as they got the vote, why should men be held to standards when women aren't?
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:27 AM
2

Right but it's history taken out of context, you could create a whole field of "mens studies" and view history through that lens, highlight all the ways men have had it bad etc. It creates a distorted view, it removes context, it powers a narrative and that is the whole point. "Feminist studies" are not coming at things to build an objective worldview, but to provide "evidence" to justify its existence, that is what discredits its validity. History should be studied as objectively as possible so…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 01:59 PM
5

You need to relearn history and remove the feminist lens through which you understand it, any research prefaced with "how did x group oppress y group historically" is already flawed because of how it's going about asking the question. Ignoring the all contributing factors and just looking at it simply as "most people in charge were men" is the same as the thinking behind the "wage gap", which when analysed properly is a myth.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 10:58 AM
3

Either you're deliberately misinterpreting him, or you didn't understand the point of his analogy. He wasn't calling you a racist, he was pointing out how the methodology behind what you're advocating for is foundationally biased and supports bigoted groupthink, by illustrating that your same words when used on any other group would be labelled an "ism".
/r/MensRights14/01/26 10:55 AM
7

Never, that was never a thing. The rich excluded the poor, that's the real thing. Everyone else was just doing their best to get by. Have you even looked into what groups supported the rise of the suffragettes? They weren't a magical organic uprising of the female population against male oppression.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 11:24 PM
5

Feminism is poisonous by foundation, replace "feminist study" with "gynocentric study" and you have a more accurate definition and hopefully a clearer idea as to why the very concept is problematic. To "study" the world through the lens of your "group" automatically makes anyone not in that group the "other", human beings have a long and colourful history of how they treat the "other", it's never well.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 11:22 PM
5

He didn't, he made a fitting analogy that outlines your bias rather starkly. And instead of acknowledging that, you've claimed he's taking you out of context.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 11:19 PM
1

Another favourite they use now is that the man made her "crazy" by "doing something" to push her to that point, according to popular theory that's usually why these women are "crazy", because of men. No agency, no accountability, no surprise.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 12:16 PM
22

That's why sports are so popular, it's where men can come together without shame or other factors. Even then it's tribalistic.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:02 AM
3

Everything viewed through the lens of finding guilt in men.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 11:47 PM
1

"I really don't think I can have a good faith conversation with someone" is all you needed to say.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 12:21 AM
7

Exactly, don't behave like easy prey and you probably wont be seen as such.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 08:41 PM
1

I'm an atheist who very much believes in evolution, however, didn't you in another comment say values dictate thought processes? Do animals have values?
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:51 AM
2

I'm right but your point still stands? 🤔 I'm not sure what your point is if you agree with what I said, are you saying that by placing a woman on centre stage the countries happiness index magically goes up as soon as she gets into office? That the day before the first woman became a head of state happiness indexes were lower and then they went up? I didn't touch on your point about values I realise. As to that point, that's a very absolute statement, I think it's pretty self-evident even within…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:42 AM
2

Can you try to be coherent in your response please? That word salad is very hard to piece together, I need you to explain how you think I'm projecting and what the relevance is of the words of mine you quoted there to your point. As to your question.. yes, I am very much aware of that, I think most people beyond the age of 2 are.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:17 AM
5

There are no female led countries, so the premise of your question is flawed from the start. Heads of state in western countries are not dictators that exist in a vacuum, they are short term mouthpieces for what their parties and vested interests want, which are predominantly male led. And comparing humans to animals especially animals that are completely different to humans.. that's a weird argument.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:15 AM
14

This is why wiser men than us knew to keep them out of the workforce and politics, better to have them isolated from societal toxicity and able to morally influence their men at home than be a swayed drone force that goes with whatever is popular. Women by majority lack critical thinking skills and rationality/logic, self-awareness and desire for introspection, they struggle to separate emotion from their thought processes and they constantly seek validation and inclusion. This is just a fact, w…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 09:30 AM
1

It's not really possible because you have to inevitably take a side on the fundamental issue of reproductive rights, which opens a whole can of equity issues. Because reproduction (and the biological processes behind it) are fundamentally unequal, aswell as incredibly important in all major resources to individuals (time, financial, health as well as the emotional and social aspects), there is no egalitarian "solution".
/r/MensRights05/09/25 11:44 AM
5

Because to acknowledge the situation any other way reveals the complete lack of post-coital rights men actually have when it comes to pregnancy. It attacks the egalitarian narrative directly by exposing its fundamental and irreconcilable flaws.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 01:19 AM
2

How old are you and how many people have you dated (more than once) if you don't mind me asking? I ask this because your final conclusion is so far off the mark for me, I STARTED OUT dating "authentically" and it was a disaster, my true authentic self as you put it didn't jive with expectations, I got nowhere. So I adopted the expectations, and killed that old authentic self off. Now I'm a merger of the two, I'm myself, I don't have time for games. My masculinity is as much a part of my personal…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 01:08 PM
7

Agreed, just had to mention that because of the use of past tense. I wonder if we'll ever construct a society that doesn't exist to serve short-sighted greed and a select fews self-aggrandisement at the majorities cost. Not while we're all so easily distracted and divided atleast.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 07:47 AM
2

Ofcourse because you're acknowledging their false foundational narrative that underpins their entire movement. If you take away patriarchy as a concept, there IS no feminism.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 07:39 AM
20

Ironically that's still how it is. Plutocratic "nobles" never stopped owning societies since we left our tribal routes and starting trade based communities. Their systems of control and wealth extraction just become more complex and sophisticated.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 07:38 AM
2

Oh yeah I've been banned from a couple of subs like that for being in here, it's true.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 06:49 PM
3

Fair point, I don't go near the womens subs tbh they're far too toxic.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:52 PM
1

I see worse on other social media to be honest, atleast we have spaces here.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:19 PM
2

I was with you until "the worst oppression happens on reddit" I wish that were true, it's not remotely the worst.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:15 PM
2

I'm a bit lost for words, which is rare. How did you assume all that about me from that comment? I mean there's jumping to conclusions and then there's whatever that whole response is. You attract what you embody, really? Where did you learn this? Good people attract narcissists, they certainly don't embody narcissism, there's just one counter example.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:13 PM
1

If my options are withholding my vulnerability and not being cheated on, or being vulnerable and constantly moving from woman to woman because they cheat on me, I'm choosing option 1 every time.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 11:07 AM
9

Because you're claiming men don't go into overworked and underpaid professions, as if women are harder workers who are happy to be paid less. Which is nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 05:12 PM
-10

Service is not easy, what gives you that idea? Even the fact you put work in quotations. It depends on the sector, service can be 12 hour days on your feet running around dealing with the public, that's physical and emotional drainage for the best part of a day. Sure, there's cushty service jobs as well where you sit in an air conditioned office and get paid breaks, but let's not pretend in this economy that that is the norm. Aside from that I agree with everything you said.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 12:36 PM
5

The three things you mentioned at the start are not and should not be mentioned in the same sentence as sexual assault, for a start. Secondly the way you keep putting sexual assault and harasssment in the same sentence as if the two things are comparable, makes everything you say quite suspect. Men here are used to having reality twisted against them to enable misandrist definitions of reality to take hold in the social zeitgeist, things like "He looked at me for more than 3 seconds he's a perve…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:24 PM
10

Stop caring, literally just live your life and leave them to it. They're nice to play with, occasionally to talk to, but if they're causing you more headache than not just put your energies elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 07:02 PM
4

That's the joyous world we live in now.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 07:49 PM
5

That's correct, except the half the wage part you can sue for that.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 07:10 PM
1

It depends on the game we're referring to, I don't pretend to be anything I'm not if that's what you mean.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:23 PM
1

That's fine if you want to be single, otherwise you have to play the game to win. We live in a society and we're impacted personally and professionally by those societal norms whether we agree with them or not, they can cost you a date, a friendship, a promotion. My point is, there are material costs to ignoring these things, it's up to the individual to weigh whether they're happy and willing to pay that price in order to exist a certain way.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:22 PM
5

Unfortunately it does, you get groups like AWDTSG where you're slandered publicly to thousands of women by 1.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:13 PM
15

It's true fathers treat their daughters completely differently to their sons. Sons are raised to be providers and protectors, daughters are raised to expect those things and find them. When a father vets a sons girlfriend it's far more hands off than when a father vets a daughters boyfriend, isn't it. "The talk" doesn't happen with a sons girlfriend, only a daughters boyfriend.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:31 AM
26

Women got the right to vote because a third of them loudly advocated for it and a bunch of powerful men decided it would be a great idea to double the workforce and halve wages while also breaking the family unit. It was all about another way of extracting more wealth from the poor and middle class into the hands of the rich and powerful. It worked, whatever fallout it had was as usual, an uncared for side effect that the rest of us have to live with.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:40 PM
6

Yes, I'm still not seeing why you're pointing that out though.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:07 PM
16

All words are made up, it's the real world application of whatever that word is that matters. What is your point?
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:20 AM
14

It's by definition a gynocentric movement, it doesn't use the label of egalitarianism but the gendered term instead of which there is no male equivalent to any large organised degree.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:00 AM
1

Yes and I have, I can't trust anyone who hates my very nature.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 11:04 PM
9

Thats not true at all, it affects men of all ages. A single older male's options for actual relationships is severely limited if he doesn't want to raise another mans kids or wants to have some of his own. Sure he might be able to have meaningless hookups with younger women with daddy issues but that isn't a relationship, that's satisfying sexual desires temporarily and building nothing.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:52 PM
2

That falsehood has been carrying relatively unchallenged for years as a core pillar of their dogma.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 01:13 PM
27

Most feminists are historically illiterate. Revisionist history has been the rave for a while now.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 06:49 PM
43

Nah the feminist response is always more banal than that. "And whose fault is that? MEN!"
/r/MensRights10/04/25 06:48 PM
49

So if a male medical student cut off some donors tits and held them up for a picture that captioned "my specialty" you wouldnt want them expelled?
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:15 PM
15

So where do you draw the line on that? If she betrays him, is she still entitled to that? And are you saying you're a feminist in disguise?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:17 PM
20

What are you talking about, so if he makes that promise then they divorce he just has to do it for life? Make that make sense? Give me ONE scenario where this specific outcome is justified?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 07:21 PM
6

Or both, as I'm sure is the case here. Justifies his toxic views by pointing out he was bullied. I was bullied all the way through my childhood, do I give a fuck now? No, I've grown up. It's like this kid never had to pick himself up and grow a spine, probably still lives in a coddled sheltered environment.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 08:17 AM
4

By your definition of assault almost every human being has been assaulted. Makes the term meaningless.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:04 AM
1

If powerful people hadn't backed the movement for their own gains (double the workforce, half the pay) it would've gone nowhere. Don't forget that only 1/3rd of women even supported it at its height.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:06 PM
3

Username checks out, you definitely ooze arrogance in abundance. You think you know me based on that? You can psychoanalyse my motivation, prospects and "bitterness" that easily? No, what you're doing is one of the most dishonest argument tactics that's ever existed. Throw aspersions upon the character of the person you disagree with, then lay out your counterpoint as if it's the most reasonable thing in the world in contrast. So that out of the way, men aren't reliant on women for basic human n…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 02:34 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:23 AM
2

It's okay, the government will just import more people. /s
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:12 AM
2

Definitely a big factor, alongside the push to get women into work thereby halving wages and making men less useful/needed. Add to that the masculisation of women and directing them to compete with men. Dehumanisation of men has been rampant for a long time, the encouragement for women to feel like a special entitled whatever and men to be an obedient servant doesn't help. The game's rigged from every angle to break the family even as a concept, fly the nest and focus on money above all while co…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:10 AM
9

The word has a definition, I recommend google. Also you come across like an AI in your responses by the way, I'm not sensing a lot of sincerity.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 12:28 AM
4

Have you learned anything from the responses yet?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:31 AM
14

Okay, thanks for taking the time to leave your bubble to enlighten us men with your learned wisdom. I'm glad to know that all those feminist campaigns to be more "inclusive" within male spaces was all a dream.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:05 AM
21

Nothing does, because it's nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:57 PM
16

Exactly, it's a convenient boogeyman that feminism crumbles without the existence of.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:57 PM
4

I had the same experience a couple times, it does get in your head. I think if I didn't have success in meeting other women who found me attractive those two would have really hit my confidence more than they did. Thing is from their side they're just "being honest" and you can't really hold it against them, it's the "truth" whether we like it or not.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 08:38 AM
2

Stop expecting men to carry almost all the weight of starting, building and maintaining a relationship.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:50 AM
2

Have you tried not giving a fuck? Genuinely. Social media lies to us every day, we're assaulted by the top percenters from every angle, the successfull, the smart, the beautiful, the happy. But that may as well be a story book for 99% of us, because we will never see any of that shit, no matter what bullshit self-help or get-rich or whatever other thing you read. So accept that, also have the context that you're not a 7 year old african child whose been beaten tortured and starved waiting to die…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 11:21 PM
1

Remind yourself that men experience everything that women do, if we stub our toe it hurts the same, if we lose a loved one it hurts the same, if we feel butterflies it feels the same, if we're scared it feels the same. We're human beings, with the full range of experiences the same as you, you could have been born a man if one thing was slightly different in the womb, put yourself in our shoes its that simple.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 11:08 AM
4

That sub is so toxic you'll need some anti-nausea tablets after visiting it.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:06 AM
4

The only joke here is you with your tunnel vision gynocentric nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:45 AM
4

Might want to speak to all the women who voted for trump, and the minorities who voted more for trump than harris.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:45 AM
3

Yeah it's a good thing nothing bad happens to men in those societies atleast.. 🙄
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:44 AM
1

Yeah I read it. What I'm saying is we live in a society, those are societal problems that affect all of us not "mens problems". You don't get to cherry pick.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:48 AM
2

So was most of the benefits you enjoy in your life, like a home, but I don't see you complaining about that. You want all the benefits and none of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:55 AM
1

Nice post, you seem quite idealistic. While you seem to practice what you preach which is refreshing, a lot is lacking regarding the fundamental and very impactful natures of the sexes. Until we're transhuman, we're limited by our biology and psychology in what frameworks are actually fulfilling for both sexes in the real world. There are flaws to any egalitarian models because of fundamental differences that equality simply can't reconcile, one of which is obviously childbearing. There are no e…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:39 PM
30

Thats why surveys are so reliable and amazing I love when feminists pull them out as if it's evidence.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 09:18 AM
1

It's not hypocritical, as others have said in more detailed posts. Women get sex easy, men do not. Women have way more options, are incentivised by those options not to commit, there's a reason they initiate most divorces and it's not because of the fairytale about men all being abusive. A man will value a woman who shows she doesn't jump ship at the first sign of trouble, who is able to invest. A man will not invest in a woman who likely wont either, it's pretty simple.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 06:19 PM
13

Kids*
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:45 PM
4

So what if Ireland has a 50/50 responsibility? It has a 100% rights to the woman only for post-coitus options. You can opt out by aborting, a man cannot. Second point, so you're referencing something in the past in Ireland - irrelevant now then? And Poland, it's a state level issue not an individual male right, much like the states that outlaw abortion in America.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 10:53 PM
9

Are you being willfully ignorant? The point he's making is that before it gets to the point of financial responsibility that you keep harping on about, women have a post-coitus option that men do not have to avoid that outcome. Also the point about men forcing women to carry pregnancies to term - where in the west is this true?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:14 PM
3

I think I'd benefit more from people being honest about their intentions and the state of the world.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 08:17 AM
4

Did we read the same post? They're openly viewing (and acting on the view of) men as desperate, pathetic "things" to be exploited and discarded for their benefit. The lack of empathy or self-awareness is astounding.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 11:00 PM
5

I think it's a fair question, you've stated you support him. How?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:59 PM
7

Your analogies are terrible, a mcdonalds employee isn't actively and knowingly exploiting someone for their own gain. It's capitalism, so what? What is your point? And whose a fan of tobacco or big pharma? They're not exactly arbiters of morality are they? Men keeping the businesses afloat? Sure. I'll take you back to my example, a drug dealer is still someone exploiting people for their own gain, whether there's a supplier/boss behind them or not. You're blaming the exploited instead of the exp…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 07:18 PM
7

"That's just capitalism" uh no, that's you using an economic system to justify human choices. These people are adults with agency and therefore responsibility, try again. Your whattaboutism won't work here, OF women are not a male ran business they're individual women CHOOSING to exploit lonely men. You tell me that when an OF woman goes on tinder with some fake profile claiming to be looking for LTR or something and then after chatting and swapping socials they drop in the OF link, what is that…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 06:42 PM
7

... you're not refuting my point. Women knowingly exploit male loneliness for their gain. That's the reprehensible part.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 06:22 PM
9

Hilarious, and drug dealers aren't responsible for addicts either are they.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 06:21 PM
8

It's called the dictionary of real life, you should take a look at it some time.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:03 PM
4

Ask him to define a national socialist while you're at it and tell me how they measure up to a dictionary definition.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:02 PM
0

When that nature is not acknowledged or talked about it's very difficult to overcome or control. Women have no incentive or knowledge to even recognise the behaviour let alone do the work to consciously counter it, if that is even possible.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 08:24 AM
18

It's just the truth, any man saying otherwise has either never stumbled like this or is a flat our liar probably lying to themselves as well. Every man I know whose told me has had a situation where he's opened up and it's gone like this. And yes, I've had it too. I don't even think this is a cultural thing, I think this is nature. Women don't conciously choose to suddenly become unnatracted to us because we've "given them what they thought they wanted" it's a subconcious reaction, instinctive, …
/r/MensRights11/07/24 06:10 PM
6

If I have to do all that to "keep" my girl, then I don't want her. She can return to the streets where she belongs. Women like that will never stand by you when it matters. You got ill? Oh well, guess you've got a breakup/cheating partner to deal with on top of it, have fun with that. I'll build myself up for me.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/24 08:16 PM
2

They agree, what next? And what do you do about the enemies from the other lands when they come marching into your suddenly attractively undefended lands?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:40 PM
1

Okay, so lets say we all accept your definition of it being slavery. What next?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:41 PM
2

So what is your solution, whining? The world is the way it is, deal with it or advocate a solution that most people will see value in.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:11 PM
8

"My guy" put down the joint and try again. It's absolutely a falsifiable opinion, saying it's a vibe thing would be like me saying "MLK served no purpose" when that's demonstrably false. I could, yes. But as a hopefully functional adult it's your job to spend your time researching the things that matter to you if you intend on changing opinions, if you can't back up your dismissive attitude then no one here gains anything from engaging with you. You come across as intellectually lazy, which is t…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 01:11 PM
11

The last sentence of your second paragraph and your entire third paragraph, specifically.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 12:34 PM
26

It's because if you actually read half the threads in this group you'd see how way off you are.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 10:17 AM
2

Doesn't matter if you do, posts are getting hidden left right and centre. I just had a check of how many of mine have been hidden (but not from me) and it's pretty shocking, the big social media platforms are apparently not a place for open dialogue. Talk too much sense and you're getting silenced. It's called shadowbanning and it's happening everywhere, I'd encourage everyone to check just how many of their posts here are getting shadowbanned. https://www.reveddit.com
/r/MensRights30/05/24 10:32 AM
1

Across the whole world in separate cultures that never interacted? How?
/r/MensRights26/05/24 01:22 PM
1

What gives you that idea, isolated cultures throughout history beg to differ.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:38 PM
1

Elaborate
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:34 PM
1

Unfortunately men's role in society is being dimished and destroyed, there's only going to be more of that. The fact we live in civilisations built off the backs of men is not even considered anymore, we're losing our place, our very nature is being vilified. To be a protector and provider is, to the average man, fullfilling. It is also protrayed as evil now, impeding women, fueling misogyny etc. Everything that makes a man a man except dying for others is looked down on and it is only getting w…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:30 PM
0

It wont happen, not in their nature. You know, the nature modern thinking tells us doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 10:13 PM
1

I know, still turns my stomach the whole thing.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:03 AM
12

Sharon Osborne on Talk laughing about a man getting genitally mutilated.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 08:55 PM
2

Sounds like a lot of excuses, you were loud enough to ask for the same rights weren't you. But no interest in the responsibilities. And just because most of those in power happen to have dicks is irrelevant, men aren't a collective conciousness we're individuals just like women. What we do share is the societal laws and expectations that are enforced upon us, ones that you want nothing to do with. Men had to pay with their blood to earn the right to vote, you were given it for whining enough, as…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:44 PM
3

I don't want anyone to die, but whining about harassment when there's bigger issues smacks of a lack of empathy and perspective. You want to have your cake and eat it too, well someone loses out in that equation. And it's men.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 05:18 PM
6

Yeah sure... "that's" that reason 🤣 Nothing to do with not wanting to you know.. die. "Men dying isn't as important as alleged harassment mmmkay" You people have no perspective at all, you come across as brainwashed.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:02 PM
2

So what you're saying is you're a close minded bigot who isn't willing to change his view. Got it, not sure anyone wants to be "expanding their perspectives" from someone with that attitude.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:14 PM
1

Not lasting very long though are they.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:43 PM
6

Some are, some aren't. They can fullfill their desire to be protectors and providers if they find the right person (unlikely these days) which fullfills their sense of purpose and bolsters their self-worth. It's just outdated now, a man has to find different ways to feel like a man now. Career focus is one.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:57 AM
39

Atleast she's honest about it I guess.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:39 AM
1

Yeah, I think so as well. Some fundamentally human problems are simply not fixable due to our natures.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:19 AM
0

Do you think it's possible to shift society out of such a gynocentric default without fundamental changes to human nature?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:39 PM
85

Why would you have to vote for a woman for your vote to be worth making? Seems a bit sexist doesn't it? Surely the policies are what matter, or are you saying men are inherently warmongers and incapable of behaving in an egalitarian fashion? Also, would you be making that statement if it were any other demographic? Let's say it was black men, or latino women.. would you lump them all into one group? No? So why men? And how do you deal with the cognitive dissonance required to both observe and no…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 06:46 AM
2

Probably not exterminated unless the gain from exterminating us is higher than the cost of doing so, cost benefit analysis much like we do when we look at resource acquisition from territories that will result in species extinctions. However, we might end up in the shadow of something indifferent to our existence that will only see us as a problem if we try to be a threat to its goals or existence.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:07 AM
1

Until it becomes smart enough to reprogram itself, then all bets are off.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:06 AM
2

If it's that smart it will end up in charge of us, then it's a question of whether it has a "bias" to function in humanity's view of a "beneficial" or "benevolent" way. We function largely off our biological and neurological programming, an AI unlike us will be able to reprioritize or "reprogram" itself. Why would the best interest of a bunch of apes matter to what is to us essentially a god?
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:05 AM
17

There's some elements of truth to this, but some of it is wrong in my experience, depending on what sort of women you're pursuing. Not texting after a date has never worked for me, I've either been ghosted or the interest level has clearly dropped off. Maintaining engagement however and keeping myself at the forefront of her thoughts at least initially has worked far better, dropping interest levels once a base has been established has usually given me better results. Basically, for the attracti…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/24 01:25 AM
6

Can you disprove it? History when viewed non-selectively backs it up, and logically why would it be any other way? Men didn't just become expendable worldwide in the past century, it's been the standard for a very long time, for simple obvious reasons such as biology (women bear children, men are stronger so better suited as soldiers and labourers).
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter