TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeautifulSoft1939 Archive

View 1 post and 16 comments by BeautifulSoft1939 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

u/rusty083 It was in their own country, within Ontario.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:55 AM

Very much has made the claim that it will change what women find attractive, which traditional feminism argued was rooted in male-led patriarchy rather than women's natural selves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:43 PM

What patriarchy does, or did, was admit to itself what the nature of woman is. Human relations emerge naturally, mostly, only as societies get increasingly numerically complex do we see more artificial or limiting constraints. Such that, since patriarchy has very obviously been a thing for a very long time, its very clear that its just the way humans behave. Women just WANT to be submissive. They're rarely forced into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:28 PM

Its sexist in the sense that its quite literally selecting exclusively for traits which reaffirm sexual dimorphism. That you fail to see this is moreso your own delusion than any sort of coherent retort. Women just want greater choice in who they submit to, but they still want to submit; this might be a good deal for them but its a bad deal for men, beyond that, its very much contradictory to what feminism CLAIMS they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:24 PM

>trad pill woman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:23 PM

They seek them at very considerably lower rates than men do. They also have very obvious and scientifically well-documented desires to be socially on the passive end of things in most things within their lives. They have much higher rates of neuroticism too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:42 PM

Where's your proof? Studies into this mostly come to the same conclusion, that most women, 1) desire intimate social arrangements where men take more initiative socially e.g holding more household authority, planning the dates, starting conversations, being the primary breadwinner, seek positions of management or leadership considerably less often, score much higher on neuroticism and things of that nature in psych studies, and 2) desire sexual dominance in their partner, want to be dominated, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:38 PM

Young women also have very significant difficulty in maintaining or finding relations today, most of which can be summed up as the inability to find a situation which accommodates both their desire to be independent, have authority, be strong and their natural desire to be submissive, guided, and seek arrangements that have both these, which are vanishingly rare or entirely performative on the man's part. Men are more sociobiologically variable so most of the problem for us comes from socializat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:32 PM

That's partly why, definitely. However, its also the natural and logical outcome of most women being inherently submissive and thus giving priority to social arrangements that let them live out that biological mandate. Sexual dimorphism is older than human individuation, we've always been at war with our bodies. The problem is that liberal feminism doesn't have a good answer to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:23 PM

This. Want to make it very abundantly, unmistakably clear that I'm not a fan of the social reality that nature has made. I don't like the invariability of women, I don't like its effects on them as people or on men, and I don't like the many inherent natural flaws that men have too. That said, there's just no use to deny biological realities just to make ourselves feel better. Sometimes when I'm miserly enough, it seems as though Humanity, understood as the phenomenal experience (consciousness),…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:20 PM

You are so upset by the mere suggestion that women might be inherently submissive that you failed to even read the concluding paragraph in my post. The patriarchy might just be the outgrowth of women's nature, however, ultimately it hurts them and hurts men too. However, feminists doesn't have any good answers to this after the failure of the experiment in trying to elevate women beyond their base nature. We can't just "abolish gender", either, though, changing the name of something doesn't chan…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:14 PM

Patriarchy wasn't made by men. It was the natural outgrowth from women's innate nature You should read what I said again. The patriarchy wasn't constructed, by men or women, with strategic vision. It was the outgrowth of the inherent nature of women. Re: the words about hunter-gatherers, that's all very contentious; while true that property norms, at least in the way they're viewed today, didn't exist among them, and that established hierarchies weren't the norm, they were anything but hyper-coo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:03 PM

I used the wrong term when saying "created" patriarchy, this wasn't so much some conscious decision on their part, moreso the nature of women encouraged patriarchy forming due to their inability to be sociobiologically variable like men. Women have a very specific "niche" due to sexual dimorphism and the patriarchy is just a natural reflection of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:50 PM
1

There are more who are into it than you'd imagine but its definitely somewhat niche. That said, switches are the most natural for both genders. Someotimes you're dominant, sometimes you're submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:39 AM
1

Its great, women that are very submissive are so disgusting to me. I like switches, people who can do both, that's more natural. Totally victim women are just gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:35 AM
1

You are objectively wrong, though. In every way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter