TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bebbykhan Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Bebbykhan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

you are the one that replied to my comment. You should therefore have been aware of what I was saying before commenting. It's not my responsibility to repeat all of what I previously said in literally the same comment thread. I am not sure why you are so arrogant and outraged. The entire legal system functions this way. To say that this is predatory behavior is ridiculous. By this logic, anyone suing anyone is a predator. And yes, settlements are voluntary. No one forced him to settle. On a cost…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:02 AM
1

no shit. That is how negotiation and settling works. It is a cost benefit analysis, including taking costs into account. I literally said that in an earlier comment. Unfortunately for you though, it is still voluntary. I am a lawyer too so I guess my comprehension of the situation would be better than yours. But I don't know. You tell me.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 08:39 PM
-17

Yes I did and you haven't properly understood the word settlement. Settlement depends on negotiation, meaning he agreed to do it and every order part of the settlement to make it go away. No one forced him. He was not compelled. He voluntarily agreed to cut women's hair. You literally have no idea how his case would have gone had it actually gone to Court and are blaming the law although this wasn't a judgment. In return for me reading the article, you could now read into the definitions of judg…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:30 PM
-22

He settled it... meaning there is no order forcing him to cut her hair because his case wasn't decided yet. You made news out of someone running out of money for legal fees. She is entitled to sue anyone she likes, whether she succeeds is another matter though. Edit: settlement explanation for everyone who doesn't understand what it means: Settlement depends on negotiation, meaning he agreed to do it and every term of it to make it go away. No one forced him. He was not compelled.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 02:19 PM
4

OP did say apparently.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:03 AM
1

Join the club.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:24 AM
1

Imgur isn't directly advocating for those causes. If the owner of imgur was a pedophile, a member of the KKK or a climate change denier I also wouldn't go on that site. I also switched banks in order to encourage fossil fuel divestment so you're really barking up the wrong tree. I am currently trying to 'buycott' Nestle and that is hands down difficult. As opposed to you, I try my best not to encourage damaging behavior of any kind once I am aware of it. I know you want to tell yourself that you…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:25 AM
1

Last time I checked 9news wasn't advocating for rape legalization or something. However, if that was brought to my attention, I would absolutely only use mirrors to that site. I would not go on the site anymore. I never attacked the article so don't give me that. Re funding, that's a really farfetched argument and you know it. Their views aren't like they are because they don't have funding. ROK is an ideological battle ground and I'm disappointed to see you are still not acknowledging how damag…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 12:16 AM
1

I commented more than once in that thread. I was continuously downvoted for making the point that financial support should not go to someone with views like "rape should be legalized" or "women are all inferior to men". I don't see how being conscious of the fact that hits generate income is an ad hominem. By linking straight to the site, it creates the impression that the source is acceptable. However, if this sub did find those views abhorrent, then the average redditor should be able to recog…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:25 PM
-5

I don't see how I'm backtracking and where your analysis of one word gets you. Do you have a qualification in English or are you just trying to berate me for disagreeing with you? I was taught that for example "I'm coming to get you" and "I'll come and get you" have the same meaning outside of the temporal aspect. The and in this case is conjunctive. To illustrate this further, the phrase "nice and clean" translates to "schön sauber" in my first language and does not literally refer to something…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:08 AM
-3

Giving a website tons of views and ad revenue is unfortunately a form of support. This is why mirrors should be used.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:00 AM
-14

They also support and link to Return Of Kings, no mirrors. When I pointed that out, I was down voted as well. That's when I came to the same conclusion as you. It's very obvious they don't want discussion, they just want to make, very often damaging, generalizations without the need to consider anything besides their own opinions of how the world works. This sub has become an echo chamber for men one small step to the left from PUAs. You can call yourself left wing if you want but that doesn't m…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:09 PM
1

And that's how it should be with this.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 12:03 AM
2

It's not only about the source. This guy is a self proclaimed rapist. Why the hell is this sub supporting him?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:48 AM
-1

Thank you! Plus this is giving him heaps of page views. Great job, r/mensrights. This subreddit is helping fund this guy now. If r/feminism links to extremist sites now, this subreddit cannot complain about it. Edit: this is the kind of guy you are supporting - http://imgur.com/a/yIHoq http://i.imgur.com/wktH2Yt.jpg http://i.imgur.com/P5haimH.jpg
/r/MensRights11/04/16 11:20 PM
2

Return of Kings advocates for rape legalisation and says women are not good for anything besides serving men. That's even more intense than TRP. I do not know how those are not abhorrent views.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 11:07 PM
-1

I don't see how I'm disagreeing with you. Because my point is not to help fund bad and damaging ones by giving website hits to the one article that you agree with on a site filled with stuff you recognise is wrong. The best analogy I can think of is this: It's like sharing an ISIS video because something in it caught your eye. Even if the content is relatively innocent, It would still be a bad idea to then show this video to someone else because at that point you are helping fund an ideology you…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:09 PM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 03:58 PM
-9

Agreement isn't really the point I am attacking here but I think as a matter of principle I would not support an extremist, especially considering the kind of views return of Kings peddles, I would not give this guy page views. It's a question of ethics. I would do the same to extremists in the feminist field. Edit: this is the kind of guy you are supporting - http://imgur.com/a/yIHoq http://i.imgur.com/wktH2Yt.jpg http://i.imgur.com/P5haimH.jpg
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:38 PM
-35

This subreddit links to return of Kings? Seriously? Does this mean r/mensrights condones other stuff that's on that site as well now? Edit: this is the kind of guy you are supporting - http://imgur.com/a/yIHoq http://i.imgur.com/wktH2Yt.jpg http://i.imgur.com/P5haimH.jpg
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:05 PM
2

I agree, the discussion is important, but this guy didn't do it any favors. In fact, he destroyed a lot of progress.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:07 PM
7

Yeah what the fuck. Does being a man now mean having power over women? It's scary how much this guy was upvoted. This is why people complain about this subreddit. Prime example.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:23 AM
3

I think it was just about the abortions but she is incredibly toxic.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:19 AM
-1

I do consider myself an egalitarian and want to fight for equality but I don't believe that the word feminism denies that. I am a huge admirer of the suffragette movement and eternally grateful for what traditional feminism has done for my standard of life. I am able to recognise how terrible my life as a woman would have been if those movements hadn't existed. Part of this is also my belief that in order to achieve equality we must also involve men and fight for men's rights. The best results c…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:57 AM
5

It's ridiculous for everyone. She only said that to once again draw attention to the fact that she's a woman and that she's the only one who cares about women's issues. It's bullshit. Everyone's aware of that. With that shit with Steinem and that crazy man hater that advocates against accused's rights she hired, she couldn't desecrate the feminist movement any more if she tried.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:04 AM
-1

You're talking about feminists like they're another species. I'm a feminist and I'm completely for men's rights. Stop seeing what you want to see. My university had a men's action network that advocated for rape and women not being accepted into university for anything besides arts but I don't accuse anyone else on this sub of being like that. And you know why? Because I know there are assholes out there and I know it doesn't define you just because you are also for men's rights. We need to star…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:58 AM
-2

Thank you for making that point because any nuanced discussion on this sub that recognizes both feminism and the importance of men's rights is immediately decried and downvoted. Edit: I obviously could see the future.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:53 AM
0

And that's your assumption.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:05 AM
0

Yeah and that brings me back to my original point: the internet is not representative. I've seen loads of feminists support Sanders, I believe she's trying to counter that by mopping up the extremists. I see it more as a move of despair than anything else. Any woman that pretty much says vote for me because I'm a woman is seriously lacking points. Also I don't know about the US but Germany apparently has a about 10 or 30%, don't remember exactly, rape conviction rate. While I completely agree th…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:59 AM
1

I really doubt Hillary gives a shit about anything but getting elected.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:27 AM
-1

I have yet to meet a woman that does. What happens on the internet is not necessarily representative.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:54 AM
1

I was actually thinking about that. How would people like that react if they were put into a situation where they are falsely accused? I really doubt they would have the integrity to admit they were wrong.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:45 AM
1

Oman, for one.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:39 AM
1

I was referring to the attitude. Also, women are a lot worse off in a lot of countries.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:27 AM
2

I know I really don't and I'm willing to bet that no Arts or Law majors (Ie me) do unless they have also taken Business units or something. And that's a real problem because we are taught to be qualitatively analytical which gives a lot of us the false confidence that we can have an understanding of something that is not strictly qualitative when really, we don't have the tools to do so. Just like my partner can't read case law with the same understanding I can, I simply cannot analyse studies u…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:25 PM
2

I think a lack of education in statistics is a big issue. I say this because I don't have any and I feel it acutely because I just don't have that depth of comprehension. I know my weakness and never lead debates or anything so it's not an issue for me but now picture the fact that there are a lot of people out there that are not this self aware and, because it's the internet, I'm sure there are a few malicious people involved in well.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:07 PM
2

Yes but the reason why I assume you call them reasonable is because they will debate you on it and concede if you have proven them wrong. I was misinformed on the wage gap, especially because the myth was supported by a lot of high profile figures, but my partner showed me a podcast on it from a reputable academic and I agreed that I was wrong. Because that's how it works. I can't possibly know everything but I can be open minded.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:04 PM
5

And that's not even the worst of it. Opposition is immediately decried as sexism. (Same tactic as BLM.) You know it's not about solving the problem when debate is suppressed at all costs.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 04:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter